1087:. Then I found the Arbitration committee, and read through most of the archives. For context, the current ongoing case was JYTDOG2, and I started reading UA 6 months before that. Then I (eventually) created an account, and realizing I didn't know a lot about wikitext or citations, I put my name on the mentor list, and made a few edits (they were not good edits). Then the Rexx case showed up, and I thought I should make a statement. After I got blocked, I quickly appealed. I got a quick question about editing wikipedia before, witch I interpreted as "before you made a statement at Arbcom, had you made any edits to wikipedia?" As I had a whole 8ish edits, I (very stupidly) said yes. You can see the rest on wiki, other than the emails to Worm that Turned. In those emails, he suggested I work on another project for at least 6 months, and avoid dispute resolution as long as I can if/when I get unblocked. I continued to read cases, and look through archives, rfas, and FRAM. Thats when I realized who I had been dealing with, and realized how bad my situation was. So I kept reading, saw the whole JSS/Bleeblebrox mess play out, Estorix, Hog Farm's RFA, The Lordes saga (you can't make this stuff up), and even more recently the tropical cyclones and Mazjac. I want to reiterate,
1094:
license reviewers (NPP for images). So I applied, the first time, I failed due to concerns of hat collecting. A few months later, I passed, but it was close, as someone brought up my EN-wiki block, and it caused a lot of drama that eventually caused an admin to warn people about bringing en-wiki drama to commons, and would eventually close as successful with a reminder to leave en-wiki drama at En-wiki. I really appreciated the intervention and support. But it made me realize this would continue to haunt me until I cleared it up. By this point someone had dragged me to AN about it in march, but the issue was resolved after we realized something had been mistranslated.
597:
with the project is immediately a sock. I wouldn't be surprised if, as a hypothetical, the editor finds an arbitration case being discussed in a venue they run across, and decide to take a look at the current cases. They find the page, see that statements are allowed to be made, and then decide to chime in. The only suspicious edit I can see, is their first edit to make a section on Worm That Turned's talk page. This isn't to say that there's no possibility of sockpuppetry, it simply would seem to me that everyone is a bit too fast to call sock based on account age alone. So I ask, with the full assumption that the block was made in good faith, and per
35:
812:
1333:
933:
318:
262:
502:
sockpuppet. You said you've edited before...would you be willing to share the name of your previous account(s)? If you are not willing to do so publicly (such as if this is a new account for privacy reasons), I think it would be reasonable for you to email the
Arbitration Committee with the name(s) and they can confirm publicly that you've disclosed them.
1014:
project for at least 6 months before requesting unblocks. I wound up waiting 2 years before starting to edit on commons, and have become a patroller, helping to fight vandalism. Looking back on this incident, I was really stupid, and applaud everyone involved for staying civil and answering my questions.
1134:
You have an open unblock request. You don't need to ping individual admins. I guess if you're curious why it's taking so long, it's because you seem to be someone's undisclosed alternate account and to have a morbid fascination with
English Knowledge (XXG)'s drama, yet you've apparently contributed
652:
Thank you for the quick response, and my apologies for questioning it. It actually took me a while to figure out which case references they were referring to, before it very suddenly dawned on me. This now leads me to the same camp as you and
GeneralNotability, wondering which account they previously
501:
So here's the thing. You created a
Knowledge (XXG) account, went straight for an arb's talk page, and have displayed a good deal of knowledge of the behind-the-scenes parts of Knowledge (XXG), so much so that it's pretty obvious you're not new here. Usually, that combination of factors means troll or
1414:
The membership in the reviewer group is intentionally not time-limited. You are not required to review pages, especially as you hadn't asked for the permission, and you are not required to do so before any deadline. Take your time. I just know how difficult it could have been for you to request this
1013:
I Have contributed over 100,000 edits to wikimedia commons, and would like to have the block removed. I think the block has served its purpose, and is only making more difficult for me to help fight vandalism from commons that spills onto en-wiki. When I was blocked, WTT recomended I work on another
596:
I've been watching this whole situation play out. For anything it's worth, I don't entirely see any obvious indicators here. Sure, they seem to have an advanced knowledge of the behind-the-scenes. But that doesn't mean that every single person who reads up on the policies and familiarizes themselves
1193:'s primary (or only) activity is to perform maintenance work, with a credible-enough story provided for the history behind this. While a focus on maintenance can quickly become disruptive due to a lack of contribution experience (again, zero images on Commons), it's not evidence of sockpuppetry. If
1093:
In
January, I logged into commons for the first time. I used what I learned from en-wiki to be a good contributor. I patrolled new pages, helped at DR, and helped a massive font categorization project. As I got more experience in fighting vandalism and copyright, I found myself needing the tools of
723:
I understand why our community members are concerned. You've acted in a manner that implies you have a lot of knowledge of
Knowledge (XXG) behind the scenes - knowledge that generally comes from years of experience. I've looked at your edits and I have to agree, I would assume you've previously had
691:
As you have said, I have read large amounts of arb com cases. Why do you think I want attention? And to give you the reason I made that first edit was to ask about adoption (ask him if you want to) and not seem like an idiot by talking about it on his talk page. And I’m just saying it can’t hurt to
727:
Can you please explain, on wiki (or to me by email if the reasons are private) - how you have so much knowledge of the inner workings of wikipedia, including history of individuals. I don't accept "I have read many Arbcom cases" without further explanation - why exactly? There's far more salacious
625:
This is a helpful new contributor who has taken the time to read through ArbCom cases including over 5 year old ones, familiarized themselves with functionary usergroups (CU, OS), all in absolute silence, before becoming active in a suddenly awakened interest to participate in highly controversial
774:
Hi, thanks for your email, but I prefer to communicate on-wiki when possible. I'm not really the best person to ask about proving whether or not you have any alternate accounts, as I don't get involved in that area. I declined your unblock request because you appeared to assert that you did have
1392:
Thank you for the user right, I'm planning on taking a few days to read up on en-wiki CV policies and tools, and patrolling here when I can. I understand your concerns about my lack of uploads on commons, and will probably take a while to feel comfortable making reports to anything other than
700:
I gave my consent (as if it matters anymore) and I regularly check the arb com cases list and that’s how I found it and thought it would be a good idea to add my 2 cents to that case. One last thing, can you give me one single piece of concrete evidence that I am not telling the truth?
201:
edit that got you blocked, not Serial Number's. As for getting you unblocked, an uninvolved admin is going to evaluate your request for unblock. See the category at the bottom of the page. Quite a few admins follow the category, so I hope one will get around to you soon.
1169:. Of the remaining contributions, 606 are from semi-automated file (speedy) deletion nominations, 570 are from mass actions such as text replacements and deletion nominations using VisualFileChange, and 174 are from category changes made using HotCat.
1135:
constructively to another project. So passing admins probably don't know to do. I suspect what will eventually happen is that you'll get unblocked when someone takes a leap of faith on you. I guess we can try to speed up the process a bit.
559:
I will if all other options fail out myself to arb com. I will willingly do a sockpuppet investigation or have a checkuser look at my IP logins. Will any of those options work to your satisfaction and/or be available in this case?
537:
Um I meant I edited before on this account and before I ever made this account I read the policy pages and a large amount of arb com cases (including both the lightbreather case and brownhairedgirl.) I can see your points though.
1083:". After numerous visits, I got curious and clicked the link. From there I looked around using the handy navigation templates at the bottom of the page, in addition to inline links. from UAA, I went to the admin page, then to
1211:
Thanks for the quick response, As I'm interested in CV work, CV academy seems like a good place to start, but I have a hunch that I'll get rejected on edit count basis dispite my work on commons. Any tips or recommendations?
217:
would check user checking my logs for any links to accounts suffice to you as evidence that this a users primary account or would a sockpuppet investigation be the better idea? ps: do you know why they removed my statement?
632:
1185:
and could have been one of the few types of edit wars I might have performed in
Alachuckthebuck's situation as well. On the English Knowledge (XXG), an edit filter would have prevented the uploader's inappropriate
728:
areas to investigate, even on
Knowledge (XXG). The vast majority of Arbcom cases are dull, due to the diversity. Different people find different ones interesting, depending on where their area of interest lies.
626:
areas behind the scenes. They will, if unblocked, suddenly make helpful contributions to the encyclopedia, because their interest in stirring up attention behind the scenes has suddenly gone away with the block.
789:
21:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC) Thank you for reading it, and I apologize for confusing you about that, it's very frustrating to not be able to edit and do the fun stuff so I have to the not-fun stuff first sadly.
724:
an account. Given that you have edited "project pages", and appear to have significant knowledge of
Knowledge (XXG), it appears that you are breaching our policy on "illegitimate uses of alternate accounts".
1233:
can be a good way to find things you might not yet be aware of and could easily look up without a trainer. If something does remain confusing, please let me know on my talk page and I'll happily explain.
1437:
Hi, please don't tag brand-new articles for speedy deletion. Give editors at least an hour to keep working, since the reason for deletion may no longer hold up by the time they're done working on it. --
911:
Thank you. Ps: sorry about this whole mess but I want to improve
Knowledge (XXG) and definitely made some mistakes but I stand by what I said aside from my first response witch was a mistake on my part
1347:" userright to your account. It doesn't do much; its main purpose is to allow you to declare something as "not vandalism" (as you can already revert vandalism without this privilege). Please read
1354:
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
653:
contributed on. In my case, simply out of pure curiosity to see what kind of...I suppose the only word would likely be unsavory, contributions they made before this account.
631:
A commonly applied principle when dealing with such accounts is "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck", as cited at
1267:
Welcome back to the English Knowledge (XXG). I'm sorry for making the path here a tough rocky road. Despite the initial trouble, I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
1197:'s contributions are disruptive, that can be dealt with, of course, but then please explicitly because of actual disruptive behavior, not because of my 2021 suspicion.
622:
are the culmination of a trolling attempt by someone who is not here to build an encyclopedia, and whose previous attempts to gain attention were not successful enough;
1157:
170,843 of these 173,748 contributions are from the Cat-a-lot tool for performing mass actions on categories, such as moving hundreds of single-letter SVG files from
575:
ArbCom does not deal with these regular blocks. Checkuser is not done on self-request. I simply don't believe you and would be surprised if anyone else does.
968:
449:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
358:
486:
Yes I have (UPDATE: this was a mistake that I tried to fix but got reverted, so trying to clear it up, and that is not true, I misunderstood the question).
1283:
1351:
for details about this process, and ask (instead of taking action) if anything is unclear. Focus on clear cases, stay away where you're unsure.
1369:
1363:
434:
286:
963:
353:
1067:
I have not had any accounts other than this account, and I never edited as an IP. The way I found Knowledge (XXG)'s underbelly was due to
871:: bc36274c4d830bf79d6cfd50f2bc62aa8dc6f29399bec86a7f3c01f4ee7fec42687846cf4613bfb06312bc0b5bf7c76eac8b0e11911ff4c8bb815f261f136378 is a
787:
422:
1084:
1158:
233:
I don't think a CU would be relevant, no. Or that you could get a CU to look at it. For the removal, see the edit summary by
1052:
Well, can you clear up whether you've had previous accounts? New users don't usually wander into the areas where you did.
1343:, due to your experience with reviewing files and Commons, and with Knowledge (XXG)'s internal processes, I've added the "
982:
372:
1076:
51:
331:
275:
270:
1182:
867:
580:
507:
84:
940:
325:
1148:
1057:
737:
330:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1178:
1174:
844:
You have been whaled for: Getting your self banned for making a statement to arbcom great job Chuck, great job.
63:
1305:
1089:
I did not edit any Wikimedia page other than my EN-Wiki talk page from the time of my block until January 2024
517:
619:
1170:
1097:
Sorry for the wall of text, I hope this clears everything up. I'm happy to answer any additional questions.
576:
503:
240:. There, now I've pinged Beeblebrox for you. He's a CU, he can tell you about your logs etc. if he likes.
598:
194:
1144:
1117:
1053:
750:
729:
1293:
280:
1143:
what do you think? Do the edits on Commons convince you this isn't an undisclosed alternate account?
414:
Below this, you immediately declare you have edited before. Please appeal from your original account.
1458:
1443:
1402:
1340:
1217:
1194:
1190:
1121:
1103:
1071:, and his channel HAI (half as interesting). The older videos started with directions to navigate to
1015:
946:
913:
882:
845:
791:
785:
756:
702:
561:
539:
487:
476:
456:
420:
336:
219:
179:
165:
131:
117:
775:
multiple accounts. I have to endorse WTT's views above, that the administrative side of things is
1420:
1382:
1318:
1289:
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
1239:
1202:
1162:
1041:
901:
673:
640:
525:
520:, I'd refuse any non-public disclosure in this case. It's either proper disclosure or the block.
306:
245:
207:
154:
107:
69:
829:
755:
I have sent you an email with the whole picture. Please let me know any questions you may have.
1166:
1274:
875:
178:
And um can you have someone oversight the edit thank asked for my block and get me unblocked?
633:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Administrators_instructions#Non-CheckUser_cases
443:
292:
65:
34:
1394:
1348:
1080:
281:
Undisclosed alternative accounts are not to be used in discussions internal to the project.
1439:
780:
472:
415:
234:
1072:
17:
811:
655:
612:
603:
601:, what evidence remains of sockpuppetry that is sufficient enough to warrant a block?
1416:
1378:
1314:
1235:
1198:
1138:
1037:
897:
695:
669:
649:
636:
591:
554:
521:
302:
241:
203:
150:
145:
No. I don't have access to your IP. It was the nature of your edits, most especially
103:
835:
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something
1332:
67:
1465:
1447:
1424:
1409:
1386:
1322:
1243:
1224:
1206:
1152:
1129:
1111:
1061:
1045:
1023:
921:
904:
890:
853:
799:
764:
743:
710:
677:
659:
644:
607:
584:
569:
547:
529:
511:
495:
480:
464:
424:
310:
248:
227:
210:
187:
173:
157:
139:
125:
110:
102:
Hi, Alachuckthebuck. Whose sock are you, please? Is your main account blocked?
279:
from editing for editing project space without disclosing your main account.
1179:
restoring inapplicable speedy deletion tags against the uploader of the file
1068:
261:
1231:
the list of questions usually asked in counter-vandalism academy trainings
285:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
1370:
Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit
1189:
I'll unblock primarily because the existence of this request shows that
289:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
872:
720:
Since he's been emailing me, I replied the following to Alachuckthebuck
149:. PS, you have to spell the username right if you want a ping to work.
1415:
rather simple and un-dangerous userright after a years-long block.
1301:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
692:
check as checkuser is mainly used in sockpuppet investigations.
1079:). On the top of that page is a note: "Not to be confused with
668:
correct, and I'm always disappointed when the principle fails.
1270:
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
896:
I've added it to the page where it usually goes, at the top.
518:
Knowledge (XXG):Clean_start#Contentious and scrutinized topics
70:
28:
1161:
to one of its subcategories, or replacing all occurrences of
1331:
931:
316:
260:
1229:
Thanks for the appeal. I share your concern, but I think
431:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
130:
This is my main. What makes you think I’m a sock? My ip?
451:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1230:
996:
992:
986:
977:
973:
959:
955:
951:
859:
can someone do me a solid and add this to my user page?
386:
382:
376:
367:
363:
349:
345:
341:
238:
146:
881:
please let me know if that isn't allowed. thank you.
939:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
324:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1173:are from file uploads... on Commons. There's a
78:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
863:put the code in the userbox on the right.
403:I am not a sock, this is my main account.
1364:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing pending changes
615:, there are two possible scenarios here:
164:Forgot the stinking capital letters lol.
88:when more than 8 sections are present.
1159:commons:Category:IBM Plex Sans Hebrew
7:
1181:, which, uh, is excused at least by
1177:for edit warring which consisted of
1036:Welcome back, see below for details
779:. The fun stuff is writing content.
664:No worries – assuming good faith is
878:to this user's real-life identity.
618:The case references at the end of
25:
82:may be automatically archived by
1077:Knowledge (XXG):Unusual Articles
810:
33:
1284:contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
1466:18:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1448:17:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1425:00:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1410:23:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1387:22:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1323:22:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1244:00:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1225:23:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1207:22:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1153:02:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1130:00:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1046:22:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
1286:page covers the same topics.
1112:02:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
1062:01:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
922:16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
905:09:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
891:00:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
854:01:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
765:03:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
744:10:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
711:23:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
678:22:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
660:22:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
645:21:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
608:21:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
585:19:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
570:17:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
548:20:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
530:19:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
512:17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
496:16:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
481:10:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
465:01:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
425:14:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
311:00:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
249:22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
228:16:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
211:16:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
188:16:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
174:16:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
158:12:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
140:01:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
126:01:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
111:23:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
1366:, the guideline on reviewing
1307:Volunteer at the Task Center
1024:19:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
943:, who accepted the request.
328:, who declined the request.
1482:
1183:the response to the block
800:21:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
435:guide to appealing blocks
287:guide to appealing blocks
18:User talk:AlaChuckthebuck
1372:, when to accept an edit
1345:pending changes reviewer
1295:Get help at the Teahouse
1276:Learn more about editing
1125:
1107:
1019:
917:
886:
849:
795:
770:Response from Ritchie333
760:
706:
565:
543:
491:
471:Have you edited before?
460:
223:
183:
169:
135:
121:
1175:relatively recent block
1163:commons:Category:Sheeps
620:Special:Diff/1007961231
1336:
1167:commons:Category:Sheep
936:
321:
265:
85:Lowercase sigmabot III
1335:
1085:WP:User access levels
983:change block settings
935:
373:change block settings
320:
297:Your reason here ~~~~
264:
1453:Thanks for the tip!
1282:Alternatively, the
1264:Hi Alachuckthebuck,
830:squished by a whale!
197:"..? No. And it was
98:Whose sock are you?
1337:
1171:Zero contributions
937:
868:Committed identity
322:
266:
840:
716:Response from WTT
504:GeneralNotability
92:
91:
57:
56:
16:(Redirected from
1473:
1456:
1400:
1346:
1313:Happy editing!
1310:
1308:
1298:
1296:
1279:
1277:
1215:
1145:NinjaRobotPirate
1142:
1118:NinjaRobotPirate
1054:NinjaRobotPirate
1002:
1000:
989:
971:
969:deleted contribs
934:
834:
824:
814:
754:
751:Worm That Turned
699:
658:
606:
595:
558:
448:
442:
392:
390:
379:
361:
359:deleted contribs
319:
300:
116:I am not a sock
87:
71:
48:
47:
37:
29:
21:
1481:
1480:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1454:
1435:
1398:
1344:
1341:Alachuckthebuck
1330:
1306:
1304:
1294:
1292:
1275:
1273:
1262:
1213:
1195:Alachuckthebuck
1191:Alachuckthebuck
1136:
1122:Alachuckthebuck
1116:Courtesy ping @
1104:Alachuckthebuck
1050:
1049:
1027:
1016:Alachuckthebuck
990:
980:
966:
949:
947:Alachuckthebuck
932:
929:
927:Unblock request
914:Alachuckthebuck
883:Alachuckthebuck
879:
861:
846:Alachuckthebuck
842:
818:
807:
792:Alachuckthebuck
772:
757:Alachuckthebuck
748:
718:
703:Alachuckthebuck
693:
654:
602:
589:
562:Alachuckthebuck
552:
540:Alachuckthebuck
488:Alachuckthebuck
457:Alachuckthebuck
454:
446:
440:
439:, then use the
428:
405:
380:
370:
356:
339:
337:Alachuckthebuck
332:blocking policy
317:
314:
313:
290:
283:
258:
220:Alachuckthebuck
180:Alachuckthebuck
166:Alachuckthebuck
132:Alachuckthebuck
118:Alachuckthebuck
100:
83:
72:
66:
42:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1479:
1477:
1469:
1468:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1367:
1329:
1326:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1187:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1075:the long way (
1034:
1011:
1007:Request reason
1004:
930:
928:
925:
909:
908:
865:
860:
857:
833:
817:
808:
806:
805:Self wikiwhale
803:
771:
768:
717:
714:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
667:
629:
628:
627:
623:
535:
534:
533:
532:
484:
483:
429:
412:
408:Decline reason
401:
397:Request reason
394:
315:
284:
268:You have been
267:
259:
257:
254:
253:
252:
215:
214:
162:
161:
99:
96:
94:
90:
89:
77:
74:
73:
68:
64:
62:
59:
58:
55:
54:
44:
43:
38:
32:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1478:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1432:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1396:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:Best regards,
1371:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1342:
1334:
1327:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1309:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1280:
1278:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1260:Welcome back!
1259:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1140:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1100:All the Best,
1099:
1096:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1033:
1031:
1030:Accept reason
1026:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1010:
1008:
1003:
998:
994:
988:
984:
979:
975:
970:
965:
961:
960:global blocks
957:
956:active blocks
953:
948:
944:
942:
941:administrator
926:
924:
923:
919:
915:
906:
903:
899:
895:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
877:
874:
870:
869:
864:
858:
856:
855:
851:
847:
841:
838:
832:
831:
825:
823:
822:
815:
813:
804:
802:
801:
797:
793:
788:
786:
784:
783:
778:
769:
767:
766:
762:
758:
752:
746:
745:
741:
740:
735:
734:
733:
725:
721:
715:
713:
712:
708:
704:
697:
679:
675:
671:
665:
663:
662:
661:
657:
651:
648:
647:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
624:
621:
617:
616:
614:
611:
610:
609:
605:
600:
593:
588:
587:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
556:
550:
549:
545:
541:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
462:
458:
453:
452:
445:
438:
436:
427:
426:
423:
421:
419:
418:
411:
409:
404:
400:
398:
393:
388:
384:
378:
374:
369:
365:
360:
355:
351:
350:global blocks
347:
346:active blocks
343:
338:
333:
329:
327:
326:administrator
312:
308:
304:
298:
294:
288:
282:
278:
277:
273:
272:
263:
256:February 2021
255:
250:
247:
243:
239:
236:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
212:
209:
205:
200:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
176:
175:
171:
167:
159:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
128:
127:
123:
119:
114:
112:
109:
105:
97:
95:
86:
81:
76:
75:
61:
60:
53:
50:
49:
46:
45:
41:
36:
31:
30:
27:
19:
1463:
1459:
1455:All the Best
1436:
1407:
1403:
1399:All the Best
1375:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1338:
1312:
1303:
1300:
1291:
1288:
1281:
1272:
1269:
1266:
1263:
1222:
1218:
1214:All the Best
1088:
1051:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1012:
1006:
1005:
978:creation log
945:
938:
910:
880:
866:
862:
843:
836:
828:You've been
827:
826:
820:
819:
816:
809:
781:
776:
773:
747:
738:
731:
730:
726:
722:
719:
690:
599:WP:ADMINACCT
551:
536:
485:
455:
450:
432:
430:
416:
413:
407:
406:
402:
396:
395:
368:creation log
335:
323:
296:
276:indefinitely
274:
269:
216:
198:
177:
163:
129:
115:
101:
93:
79:
39:
26:
1433:CSD tagging
1440:asilvering
1417:~ ToBeFree
1379:~ ToBeFree
1315:~ ToBeFree
1236:~ ToBeFree
1199:~ ToBeFree
1038:~ ToBeFree
974:filter log
876:commitment
782:Ritchie333
670:~ ToBeFree
637:~ ToBeFree
577:~ ToBeFree
522:~ ToBeFree
473:PhilKnight
417:Ritchie333
364:filter log
303:~ ToBeFree
235:Beeblebrox
1358:See also:
1328:+reviewer
1186:removals.
1069:Sam Denby
993:checkuser
952:block log
656:EggRoll97
613:EggRoll97
604:EggRoll97
433:read the
383:checkuser
342:block log
195:Oversight
52:Archive 1
1139:ToBeFree
964:contribs
898:Bishonen
696:ToBeFree
666:normally
650:ToBeFree
592:ToBeFree
555:ToBeFree
354:contribs
295:|reason=
242:Bishonen
204:Bishonen
151:Bishonen
147:this one
104:Bishonen
40:Archives
987:unblock
873:SHA-256
444:unblock
377:unblock
293:unblock
271:blocked
1349:WP:RPC
1339:Hello
1081:wp:uaa
839:silly.
837:really
821:Smash!
80:5 days
1460:Chuck
1404:Chuck
1219:Chuck
1073:wp:ua
437:first
1444:talk
1421:talk
1383:talk
1319:talk
1240:talk
1203:talk
1149:talk
1126:talk
1108:talk
1058:talk
1042:talk
1020:talk
918:talk
902:tålk
887:talk
850:talk
796:talk
777:dull
761:talk
739:talk
732:Worm
707:talk
674:talk
641:talk
581:talk
566:talk
544:talk
526:talk
516:Per
508:talk
492:talk
477:talk
461:talk
307:talk
246:tålk
224:talk
208:tålk
199:your
184:talk
170:talk
155:tålk
136:talk
122:talk
108:tålk
1457:--
1401:--
1395:UAA
1216:--
1165:by
997:log
387:log
334:).
301:.
1446:)
1423:)
1397:.
1385:)
1321:)
1242:)
1205:)
1151:)
1128:)
1120:.
1110:)
1060:)
1044:)
1032::
1022:)
1009::
991:•
985:•
981:•
976:•
972:•
967:•
962:•
958:•
954:•
920:)
900:|
889:)
852:)
798:)
763:)
742:)
709:)
676:)
643:)
635:.
583:)
568:)
546:)
528:)
510:)
494:)
479:)
467:}
463:)
447:}}
441:{{
410::
399::
381:•
375:•
371:•
366:•
362:•
357:•
352:•
348:•
344:•
309:)
299:}}
291:{{
244:|
237::
226:)
206:|
186:)
172:)
153:|
138:)
124:)
113:.
106:|
1442:(
1419:(
1381:(
1317:(
1238:(
1201:(
1147:(
1141::
1137:@
1124:(
1106:(
1056:(
1040:(
1018:(
1001:)
999:)
995:(
950:(
916:(
907:.
885:(
848:(
794:(
759:(
753::
749:@
736:(
705:(
698::
694:@
672:(
639:(
594::
590:@
579:(
564:(
557::
553:@
542:(
524:(
506:(
490:(
475:(
459:(
391:)
389:)
385:(
340:(
305:(
251:.
222:(
213:.
193:"
182:(
168:(
160:.
134:(
120:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
