User talk:Anwar saadat/Archive 2

563:

a skill that he was simply born with, but one which was developed by his intelligence and an infinite capacity for taking pains. If there is a secret, it is that Tendulkar has the keenest of cricket minds. At times in a Test series he looks mortal. But he learns every lesson, picks up every cue, dominates the opposing attack sooner or later, and nearly always makes a hundred. His bravery was proved after he was hit on the head on his Test debut in Pakistan, when he was only 16; and his commitment to the Indian cause has never been in doubt. If captaincy - or rather the off-field management of men less skilled than himself - was beyond him at his first attempt, his reading of the game, and his manifold varieties of bowling, have shown the same acute intelligence. His cricket has been played in the right way too, always attacking, and because he knew that was the right way rather than because he was a child of the one-day age, as he himself modestly said. The awe of opponents was as great as that of crowds. But the finest compliment must be that bookmakers would not fix the odds - or a game - until Tendulkar was out. Surpassed Sunil Gavaskar, his guru, as the leading century-maker in Test cricket with his 35th three-figure score in November 2005.

1276:

office grosses for various movies, that would be fine. We could argue about the reliability of the figures, but at least there would be something there, measurable, discussable. But just saying that Ajith is a superstar and everyone knows what that means, so go away -- that doesn't work for an article meant to be read by millions of people who have never watched an Ajith movie, or who don't know anything about Kollywood, but who might just become fans if the article catches their eye ... and their one-minute attention span. "Super-star" is unverifiable; a box-office gross isn't. I think that we can say "popular" or "well-known" without asking for figures -- those are fairly bland claims. But we just aren't using superstar in the Indian cinema articles. Even for Shah Rukh or Aamir. It's just too subjective.

619:, it is POV. The words used in the article are purely in trade context. For instance, if a film's ROI is 150%, it is called a hit, if ROI is 300%, it is called a blockbuster. KK was a low-budget film whose ROI was over 1,000%, that's why it's called a mega-blockbuster. There is nothing POV about this. Its common knowledge as a matter of fact. Behindwoods.com is a well established magazine that regularly publishes ranks every season based on data collected from South India Film Chamber. 1607:, the one that I had created. I hadn't known that there was a scandal of the layout of the filmography. And by the way, I did not appreciate what you had done to all my images, they were copyrighted perfectly and they were removed by yourself without a discussion with me. Please, let me off - I'm solely trying to concentrate on the factors of tamil movies - creating half a dozen already - in order to retain 80: 388:

considered to be the next box office hero after Rajni (if you require link like sify i can get you that). I'm not saying Ajith is below Vijay, but i mean to say Vijay is also another major Hero of Tamil film industry and when you work on Kollywood section, you must try to improve celebrity like him also.

2030:அன்வர், நீங்கள் இங்கு புதிதாகப் பங்களிக்கத் துவங்கியுள்ளீர்கள். பெரிய மற்றும் சிக்கலான மாற்றங்களைத் தயவு செய்து பொறுமையாக பேச்சுப் பக்கங்களில் விவாதித்தபின் செய்யவும். மற்ற பயனர்களிடம் கடுமையாக நடந்து கொள்ளுதல் இங்கு ஏற்கப்படுவதில்லை. இது ஒரு விவாத மேடை இல்லை, கலைக்களஞ்சியம் என்பதை நினைவில் கொள்ளவும். 1228:

Oh okay, I would be careful about using the maps from the TN government site. Images and content from any Indian government site is copyrighted unlike American and British government websites. Please check with the TN website administrator to ensure that use in Knowledge (XXG) is permissible. Thanks!

873:

that highly liberal usage of terms like "super-star", "mega-blockbuster" are POV terms which are not rock-soldily defined or quantifiable, and when we remove with a detailed sentence long edit summary, you revert with the spurious edit summary of "revert vandalism" or "cleaning up". Trolling does not

562:

When he became the first batsman to score 50 hundreds in international cricket, Sachin Tendulkar established himself as the greatest of all Indian cricketers. Recognised by Sir Donald Bradman as his modern incarnation, Tendulkar has a skill - a genius - which only a handful have possessed. It was not

50:

Who decides if those images are illegal or not? Are you all going to investigate if the studios paid taxes as well? ROTFL! Kollywood is not recognised as an industry yet by the TN government. Those producers don't even issue vouchers for their production expenses! So industrial copyright policies are

477:

Well, KKKK is a unique story about sisters. It released almost simultaneously with another Ajith film Unnai Kodu Ennai Tharuven. Plus, Ajith's role was kinda walk-in walk-out lasting 50 minutes even though he had two duets. When it released, the media called it as guest role. But anyway, as you guys

418:

I too would like to improve Vijay's article splitting his career decadewise. But there is insufficient data about him. But I will try to gather more info and update soon. Its a myth that Vijay has given more hits than Ajith or anyone else. LOL Otherwise, he should be called King of Opening! I am not

1875:

Not all of his images appear to be tagged incorrectly, but some of them definatly are. I've warned him about it, but you probably know more about the images than I would, so the best thing to be done is if you could carefully go through them, correcting the tags where applicable, and adding the 'no

1688:

upon reverting Nobleeagle and Dwaipayanc respectively were inappropriate, as in the first case, it is a POV dispute, not a denigratory/nonsense edit, and in the second, you removed a reference to a statistical study which you did not agree with. Please revert and discuss, rather than to label edits

1662:

Personally I think that using the words "failed state" about any country is unacceptable and especially from an organisation that seeks to "explain how the world works". However, the accusations have been made, reported and rejected. The fact that it got a response from the Pakistani government was

1279:

There are many other problems with your versions of the Ajith and Vijay articles. There are lots of personal judgements; there is lots of hyperbole. That's not OK. We have to write the article so that someone who absolutely HATES Ajith would read it and say, "Well, it's accurate enough." Please try

373:

I hope you appreciate that I added Jana as the biggest flop for Ajith but Madhu wants to paint a rosy picture for Vijay and blank links saying Aadhi is his biggets flop. He is quoting Sun TV's circus ranking as a proof! If you have link from sify saying the film is a flop, please add it. Vijay gave

1526:

I removed the salary altogether. The template shows the title as annual salary. If you have that, you can add that, but please provide a reference. 'Thala' could be used with many heroes. I removed it to keep the article neutral. I left the 'Ultimate star' since he is known by that name. Hope that

1418:

Excuse me--I beg to differ that someone stating their grievances in an ArbCom constitutes harassment. In fact, I would say your subtle threats to a newbie are against etiquette. Instead, you should provide Mr. saadat with links in Wiki that could help him out in learning the ropes. Anwar saadat

591:

are most definitely POV, despite being written by the world's most respected, non-tabloid cricket magazine, and have been removed from the Knowledge (XXG) article in the past. It has to be molded into encyclopedic language, not suggestive opinions. As for the link, you have to explain that it is a

387:

I never mentioned Vijay's never gave flops. I accept and know very well of his flops. I don't know about the King of opening, but i do have some idea on film business. Vijay has given more hits consistently than Ajith and no one can deny that. He might not have acted in more good movies, but he is

1402:

Anwar, please stop your accusations. Zora has neither been vandalizing, nor revert-warring, nor making changes without discussion. If you disagree with her edits, discuss it civilly. Your actions yesterday on the Arbcom case were already borderline harassment, now please take it easy and be fair.

443:

I have been informed by several others about the Ajith article you and som other user were the ones to blame. Stop reverting cos it will eventually break the 3 revert rule. I understand Ajith being a guest in Rajavin Parvailey but how is he a guest in Kandukondain Kandukondain. Its like saying

367:

Arun, I am not anti-Vijay. I didn' say anything about Vijay's early films bcoz I didn't have the data. But Aathi is a wash-out and I have given the sify link. So I can't change that. But I have removed the prefix "flop" from Naalaya Theerpu. As regards, Ajith's "so-called flops", I have access to

353:

As you edit more on Ajith, When it comes to Ajith's flop film it is a musical hit and never mention the film flopped badly. But in the case of Vijay, the film is a flop and big slump in his career, why this partiality? If you edit in a such a way for Vijay, do the same with Ajith describe all his

1850:

Please don't think we're naïve enough not to understand what you've just written. We are a close knit community and we achieve our goals through collaborative efforts. Please try and understand how we work. If you plan to be an administrator you would have to start being civil and respect fellow

1275:

Anwar, you say that it's OK to use words like "super-star" and "mega-hit" because those have accepted meanings in Kollywood fandom. If they have any real meaning (other than "I like this actor" and "I liked this movie") then it must have to do with box office grosses. If you were to give the box

1204:

Hi Anwar...I've created taluk level maps for about 80% of all districts in Karnataka (along the lines of the Bagalkot district map). I'm in the process of revitalizing content on Karnataka districts and will no doubt get to all districts eventually. At the end of this process, I hope to have all

511:

KK is infact a mega-blockbuster as it crossed 200 days. These are trade verdicts in Kollywood, not just superlatives. You can verify this with tamilcinema.com database. It is not POV certainly. Similarly, a super star is any actor whose film business is atleast Rs100 million. There are only six

1823:

Hi! I've noticed that you have been getting into conflicts with many established editors here. Please be civil, avoid name calling and cite sources. Knowledge (XXG) is a collaborative effort and we need to work as a team and sort our differences out on the Talk pages. Please note that repeated

467:

Even i don't agree Ajith did guest role in KKKK, there were only two lead male characters. which was played by Mammooty and Ajith, Abbas played a negative role. Also half of movie revolves around him and Tabu, so Ajith must get the credit as lead hero for KKKK. please watch the movie again and

2044:

Beautiful. அண்ணா, நான் விவாதத்துக்கு எப்பொழுதுமே தயார். எனக்கும் கொஞ்சம் நாகரிகம் தெரியும். ஆனால் இங்கு சிலர் விவாதமே புரியாமல் (அல்லது விவாதிக்க தெரியாமல்) கடுமையாக அஜீத் கட்டுரையை கத்தரிக்கிறார்கள், விமர்சிக்கிறார்கள். இவர்களுக்கு தமிழும் தெரியாது தலயும் தெரியாது. பிறகு ஏன் சம்பந்தமில்லாத

147:. You should be able to pick up the style of arrangement by looking at how I have done it. This has got rid of all the white space, except where you have included odd sized userboxes, or userboxes that have been deleted. To see other ways to arrange your userboxes, see the section of 1641:

which includes a link directly to the index plus a BBC article from the following day which shows the Pakistani government reaction. If an edit of this nature is made by another editor, please discuss the matter first on the talkpage and defintely avoid edit wars.

1637:

I realise that Holy Ganga's addition of the BBC article was a controversial move considering there are differing opinions on the validity of the index. However, it is important to include this kind of information but with the modifications I made originally -:

1339:

By the way, that isn't actually my version, it's Blnguyen's. Which you reverted, then he reverted, then your reverted, then I reverted, then you reverted, then I reverted, then Zora began working on. This revert war's getting ridiculous, could you please see

1071:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 676:

and removed on "!". It made a few judgements, but did not use "mega", "super" repeatedly, and it did not make wild claims of massive popularity which segues into cult-like adulation which is obvious even to a person who has only seen one of his films -

2199:

are matters of fact and tantamounts to common sense of an industry watcher. If you go through history of that article, you can see what/how vandalism was fought and removed by myself. One of her backbenchers even had the nerve to remove the nickname

1146:}}. See the formatting of the other references. Also, the article is written in summary style to give a larger picture. So, some of the additions that you have made will be better suited in sub-articles. I hope, you are fine with this. Thanks, -- 1123:

I got rid of your sd tag for this one because "questionable notability" is not reason for being speedily deleted, please review wikipedia guidelines. I added a stub, wikify, cleanup, and references tag to the article--let's expand, not delete.

2230:

This does happen in a multicultural setting. Don't worry. Such issues can be resolved. Let me come back on this tomorrow after noon. Stay calm and away from contentious articles for a couple of days, you can always go back in history. As for

797:

is given. Links to tamilcinema.com db are given already in the article. Most of the Tamil sites use framesets. That's why direct links are not possible. If you have a issue with a line or paragraph, don't blank out the whole section. See

1652:

The FS Index is neither transparent nor generally accepted benchmark by other countries of Europe. Its conclusions are bizarre. For instance, it ranks China at No.57 and India at No.93! Does that mean China is a failed state? LOL

300:

link to an article on another language/project, you would start with a colon. However, for interlanguage links there is special code in place, which places an "in other languages" box on the left-hand side, if you make the links

1802:

knows no bounds of language, so please ensure that you adhere to this policy. Also, the use of such excalmative terms or notations such as "mega-star" "!" and "mega-hit," are not considered encyclopedic but are rather viewed as

2261:

concern) are barred from bulldozing blindly their POVs in this article. Then we can move the controversial lines and sections to the talk page and debate gradually until consensus is reached and synchronised with Tamil wiki.

801:. Look at the year 1995 and 1996 and check for yourself that Aasai ran for 210 days and Kadhal Kottai 230 days. Btw, please go through the discussion history before asking repetitive questions that I have answered elsewhere. 521:

Unfortunately, my computer doesn't read the Tamil script, and I can't read Tamil anyway, but a verdict given by an analyst is not necessarily encyclopedic, as they are usually written with a flourishing style - even though

1324:. Look at the year 1995 and 1996 and check for yourself that Aasai ran for 210 days and Kadhal Kottai 230 days. No, I am not going away. Noble Eagle's version is the last unanimously accepted version of this article. 423:

poster celebrations in the past two years or about the multiple lawsuits dfaced by his films since Pudhiya Geedhai. However, Aadhi's red card matter is undeniable now. He has no films in hand effectively now!

491:

Hello Anwar. Could you please refrain from adding the words "mega-star" and "mega-blockbuster" and "sky-high" instead of high to the Ajith article, because I think that it is POV to use such extreme terms of

368:

trade registers that say Nesam and Red celebrated 100th day in southern districts. Raja was dubbed into Telugu. I don't know where you get the idea that Vijay films never flop while Ajith films never win!

137:

Your userpage is neat. Can you help me remove the white spaces from my userpage. My userboxes are not aligned and I have absolutely no clue as to what to do about them. Anwar saadat 23:33, 15 April 2006

1478:

You don't know what you're talking about. Cool down, and get acquainted with how things work here. You've no chance taking this to arbcom at this stage, you'll just be laughed at. Friendly advice.

1918: 1142:

are good and I would like to involve more with the related sub-articles. But there are a few things, I would like to add. Please cite sources, especially for statistics and format it using {{

1745:

You know people can get blocked in a couple of hours for being as tiring as you are Anwar. I will revert POV and bias, it's up to you whether you'll take the time to put it back on the page.

2243:

and then give this as a matter of fact. By the way, Zora is not a bad editor, it could be a serious misunderstanding. Everybody commits mistakes. We'll deal with such issues gradually. --

1437:

out whole lines, paragraphs, sections and even supporting links (which are several weeks of hardwork of several contributors) without even a pretense of a discussion. She had the nerve to

397:

The reason why i contacted you was for (1) Flop film Nalaya Theerpu (2) Aadhi's red card issue with sify link. Which looked like you are dumping him rather improving his article. Anyway, "

62:

Yes, but wikipedia posts are licensed by the GFDL, and thus may cause a copyright violation if the country is a Berne convention signatory and the copyright holder asserts his copyright.

2174:. Then she proceeds to insert and delete lines conforming to her POV severely damaging the integtrity of the article. Looking at her log, I realised most of her contributions were mere 1552:. Read the source links provided already before asking for references. Thala refers to Ajith only. Only a Vijay fan will not acknowledge this matter of fact. Hardly affects neutrality. 1663:

the main reason I felt it would be better to keep it. It is better to have the issue addressed by us as editors than to remove it and let someone else come along to re-insert it.

2170:

The problem began with the repeat offender Zora (who has admitted zero knowledge of Kollywood mechanics) who blanked whole paragraphs, sections, supporting links in the guise of

2178:. I tried to reason with her. But she didn't bother to read through the links, which were proofs of the assertions in the article. So I reverted her changes. Then she went on a 1433:

Please save your arguments for arbitration, which is definitely coming in a matter of days against Zora once again unless she changes her attitude. Incase you are unaware, she

350:'s article, really i was disappointed. You might not be a great fan of him, but why do you add those debut with a "Flop film", Aathi's red card issue describing very harshly. 941:. By the way, just so you know that the prospect of you reporting Zora as a vandal is laughable. She is by far the largest contributor to articles related to Indian cinema. 92: 2195:

IPRS licensed websites. She has already been cautioned earlier in Aucaman case not to engage in revert warring. But the message is not getting across. What she calls as

897:

Noble Eagle's version is the last unanimously accepted version of this article. Go through history before presuming and reverting. I am not going to repeat myself. See

1075:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 374:

half-a-dozen utter flops before Thirumalai. But I didn't post that article. So please don't blame me as partial. All know Ajith (not Vijay) is the King of Opening.

401:". You decorated Ajith's article very well and i appriciate you for that, i would be happy to see you do the same with Vijay's article. Keep up your good work -- 1375:

Hey Anwar, you can't vote on that Arbcom page. That's only for the decisions of the arbitrators. Better revert yourself before those guys get angry at you. :-)

1317:

is given. Links to tamilcinema.com db are given already in the article. Most of the Tamil sites use framesets. That's why direct links are not possible. What

2155:

article on Ajith. I'm sure all the Indian users are well-meaning and would gladly assist you as they've helped bringing Tamil language, Tamil people, and

38:

Always make sure that the content you upload, primarily those from movie related sites are distributable under the documents quoted by you, anyway thanks

190:, Prin has said that he doesn't mind if the external links are incorporated into the template he insists on using. I would suggest the following format: 1007:

They weren't vandalism, so it doesn't help your case. You should be grateful no-one has decided to block you rather than accuse everyone of vandalism.

357:

We must be neutral when we present an article at wikipedia. I wish and request you to improve Vijay's article as Ajith's. Keep doing your good work. --

2140: 1876:

licence' tag only where it's not what it's tagged as (and there's no obvious tag to replace it with). If he continues reverting you, let me know. --

1296:

since 1967 were erstwhile stars of Kollywood. The nexus between Tamil Nadu State politics and Kollywood is unusually strong and clearly visible in

1169:, the inote template is used on the left hand side. In this case, add the URL to references & insert {{inote|pagetitle|1}} besides the text. -- 1597:

I am not a sockpuppet and wish not to be one. Please refer back to the Ajith article, I did not revert back to the old format - that was done by

270:, changing the links from the usual interlanguage links (which usually appear in the lefthand side, below the toolbox) to a list of normal links. 1292:

Bollywood stars are not as influential as that of Kollywood. That's why they haven't developed a culture of superstardom. All chief ministers of

820:.Hey;you had said that fans know thw box-office results better than tabloid.But I think the hero knows it much better than "fans" themselves.See; 1238:

No these images are available freely in public domain as they were created by GISNIC... similar to the images created by NASA. So no worries.

1098: 1709:

Please stop reverting my edits just to satisfy your POV. Those anon edits were very anti-Hindutva and got rid of known facts. So please read

2058:

In Malayalam, 'vivadham' means controversy. So 'naan eppozhuthume vivadhathukku thayar' will have a very different interpretation there :-)

126: 2031: 2000: 1700: 1989:

Hello. The rule states that you can have three reverts. Deepujoseph has had three and then stopped, so he has no grounds to be banned.

51:

not applicable here. Plus, all these images are made available for non-commercial use only as a ready-reference for fans and critics.

1297: 1258: 274:

probably explains it better, but the correct way to make links to the same article in another language is ], not ]. Happy editing!

144: 1087: 119: 231: 83: 271: 2116: 824:

himself has proclaimed Nesam;ullasam and other 1997 releases of his as flops.Atleast now;please let me correct the excesses in

287:

No, the correct way to make a cross-server link is to start with a colon. Go to both versions and try which method is working.

1895:

I'm assuming this is referring to Prin. If so, he did the same with his probable sock account, which is now blocked indef. --

1824:

trolling might get you blocked in the near future. Looking forward to some amicable settlements of disputes by you. Regards,

2148: 454:

Stop writing crap here. We know you are Prin's another alias. Watch KKKK again to know why Ajith did guest appearance in it

2182:

invoking support from other non-Tamil friends and well-wishers who began collectively pushing... and bulldozing their POVs.

1851:

editors. This is your last warning, the next time if we get complaints about you we'll have no hesitating in blocking you.

247:

I have absolutely no problem if Prin includes all the collected info within his template. But he expects others to do it.

1082: 734:

I think you are a little too liberal in your use of the word superstar, it appears 3 or 4 times in that article as well.

114: 1908:

but it is still under investigation. He uses these puppets to upload images violating copyrights and poll bogus votes.

1321:

have you seen in those articles? If you have a issue with a line or paragraph, don't blank out the whole section. See

236: 226: 1469:

from air. From her log, it appears she has not contributed anything to Wiki other than revert others' contributions.

2132: 2124: 1919:

WP:ANI#Naan_Kadavul_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs_.E2.80.A2_page_moves_.E2.80.A2_block_user_.E2.80.A2_block_log.29

702:

What the...! Are you kidding? The whole section on Punch Dialogues is outrageous and almost reaching idolatry.

1945:

LMAO! The autoblock got him (which means he has the same IP), and he's still saying it's another person. --

172: 152: 2017: 837: 419:

dumping Vijay. Infact, I didn't even write about his continuous flops before Thirumalai or about the fake

309: 278: 221: 17: 1404: 148: 2112: 1996: 1696: 881: 852: 777: 718: 688: 599: 499: 2120: 1799: 1479: 1408: 1376: 663:. That's closer to reality in Kollywood where stardom has deeper roots into the socio-political arena. 1971: 1423:

to have your questions answered--and of course, always stay civil when dealing with others. Good luck

2063: 1756: 1724: 1504: 1355: 1018: 952: 745: 645: 68: 41: 1162: 1143: 1068: 1990: 1690: 1611:' plea of 200 movies. And by the way, please contribute to the movies as well. Happy editing :) 875: 874:

apply either. We have been giving serious comments and questions, not joke comments to stir you up.

846: 771: 712: 682: 593: 493: 870: 361: 1780: 1300:. You can't find such a phenomenon elsewhere in India. So stop using Bollywood analogies anymore. 865:

Nobleeagle, another cleanup-person David Crawshaw, myself, Pa7 and Zora and I have all agreed on

866: 479: 187: 23: 770:

Please quote its official box office takings/rankings and let the reader decide for themselves.

478:

feel strongly about this, I am changing it to lead role in the article here. Btw, guess who is

444:

Madhavan, Siddharth were guests in Ayutha Ezhuthu. Please use ur common sense! Dissapointingly

2263: 2214: 2046: 2014: 1957: 1937: 1909: 1887: 1857: 1842: 1830: 1737: 1654: 1621: 1608: 1598: 1590: 1571: 1553: 1535: 1470: 1388: 1325: 1239: 1220: 1190: 1109: 1053: 987: 802: 762: 703: 664: 620: 513: 483: 469: 455: 425: 402: 375: 358: 318: 306: 288: 275: 248: 161: 52: 2191:

She tried to remove the links to songs even after being explained that they were pointing to

2103:

Anwar, I can understand the feelings of a fan. I've undergone the same feeling while editing

1710: 1465:

of these actors or the Kollywood industry in general. Still she pulls selective POV and NPOV

1341: 220:

Don't you think the user(s) on the other side of the conlict would accept this compromise? --

1664: 1643: 1139: 531: 2010: 1778:

The information is not from the back of the user's head, it is from the very source cited:

1072: 207: 2059: 1747: 1715: 1495: 1346: 1257:

If you have any concerns with the behaviour of user Zora, you should go to an ArbCom case

1175: 1152: 1125: 1009: 943: 736: 636: 445: 63: 885: 856: 781: 722: 692: 603: 503: 2266: 2247: 2217: 2163: 2088: 2067: 2049: 2038: 2019: 2003: 1960: 1949: 1940: 1925: 1912: 1899: 1890: 1880: 1862: 1845: 1835: 1813: 1788: 1763: 1740: 1731: 1703: 1667: 1657: 1646: 1624: 1615: 1578: 1556: 1542: 1511: 1484: 1473: 1427: 1413: 1391: 1381: 1362: 1328: 1284: 1265: 1242: 1233: 1223: 1209: 1193: 1179: 1156: 1128: 1112: 1102: 1056: 1046: 1025: 990: 959: 888: 859: 840: 805: 784: 765: 752: 725: 706: 695: 667: 652: 623: 606: 516: 506: 486: 472: 458: 448: 428: 405: 378: 321: 312: 291: 281: 251: 241: 175: 164: 155: 99: 55: 44: 2104: 1877: 1805: 1689:

you disagree with as vandalism. This applies to your comments to Zora and Ganeshk also.

1094: 631: 526:

is regarded as a "cricket encyclopedia", cutting and pasting profiles from its website

1446: 347: 332: 592:

magazine opinion - unless I am mistaken it is not the ranking of an official system?

2108: 1946: 1922: 1896: 1852: 1825: 1564: 1528: 2123:. This is not to say that we put wrong things, but that those do not go well with 1322: 1219:

those taluk maps! I found the taluk maps for TN districts in the government site.

817: 799: 2257:. I am willing to consider toning down the article if non-Tamil editors (without 2244: 2160: 2144: 2085: 2035: 1905: 1612: 1450: 1230: 1206: 673: 660: 634:, it's a collection of facts without POV. That's what we should be aiming for. 1293: 1171: 1148: 1043: 267: 259: 79: 1280:

to look at it from that vantage point, and write for the hater, not the fan.

845:(To Anwar saadat) This is a joke. It's not vandalism. It's a content dispute. 2236: 1810: 1785: 1603: 1424: 1281: 1262: 317:

Oops, sorry! My bad. Will restor cross-server links in other articles too.

832:;I feel fancruft in his article might only give a wrong public opinion of 1685: 1681: 1631: 711:

It is a list of quotes with which he is associated. How is this idolatry?

1563:

Just FYI, Making minor edits to improve the article is not reverting. -

354:

flop films and the continuosly flops he gave. Be neutral on dumping ...

2240: 2156: 1420: 1489:

I don't think the message is received. The fact that you have given a

171:

No worries. It looks like you have got the hang of the table already.

2081: 523: 1205:

districts looking in much the same way as Bagalkot does now. Thanks

2136: 1442: 935: 833: 829: 825: 821: 678: 343: 1871:

Multiple copyright violations and blanking notices from talk page

342:

I always liked your work and the stubborn attitude you showed on

938: 87: 1078:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

110:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2213:

We know what we are doing. But we don't have time to babysit.

399:

I wish and request you to improve Vijay's article as Ajith's

2080:

I think you understand that he's used it in the sense of a

2009:

Apart from that, reverting vandalism does not figure under

1165:}}, since it will be consistent with the whole article. In 2034:ஒருமுறை படிக்கவும். ஏதேனும் உதவி தேவையெனில் கேளுங்கள். -- 1309:

In Kollywood, actual box office collections are not given

527: 143:

I've arranged your userboxes with the same table I use on

1933: 1639: 1166: 983: 979: 975: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 898: 1461:. What is absolutely outrageous is she admits she has 1042:

The check has been done, and the sockpuppets blocked.

1904:

Wow! I just saw that talk page. He has one more sock

1441:

blocking me citing 3RR when I reverted her trolls in

1620:You are being investigated for using sock puppets. 1161:Hi, can you please format your references using {{ 1261:; the committee will hear your voice. Thank you 789:In Kollywood, actual box office collections are 530:would certainly result in POV such as this from 1841:Matter ennanu theriyama pesa koodadhu. Vartta. 1405:Knowledge (XXG):Vandalism#What vandalism is not 1097:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 1601:, if you correctly see I had linked the film, 8: 1063:Image copyright problem with Image:Deena.JPG 160:Wow! You are the best, mate! Thanks a ton!! 125:For assistance on the image use policy, see 2141:Knowledge (XXG):What is a featured article? 1680:Anwar, I believe that your edit summary to 1676:Edit summary -wrt nobleeagle and dwaipayanc 1315:x number of days run in y number of screens 795:x number of days run in y number of screens 1344:and allow the article to conform with it. 1189:links work. That's why I didn't use them. 1493:to respected editor Ganeshk proves that. 1108:Its orphaned. SO feel free to remove it. 1099:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 346:'s article. But when I saw your edits on 195: 127:Knowledge (XXG):Image legality questions 2149:Knowledge (XXG):Featured articles#Media 757:And what exactly is wrong in calling 7: 1088:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 974:I reverted the vandalisms by Zora - 617:Ajith is the only superstar in India 120:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags 1585:Sorry, I think you must be mistaken 272:Knowledge (XXG):Interlanguage links 2235:, we can properly state that many 2176:reversion of others' contributions 2151:, and then start to write a great 1185:Hi, I really don't understand how 266:I noticed you made a reversion on 31: 1083:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 115:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy 78: 24:User talk:Anwar Saadat/Archive 2 2159:to featured article status. -- 2143:, have a look at articles like 2111:. But, once we understand what 1736:Stop reverting to fascist POV. 1093:This is an automated notice by 828:'s article.Being an admirer of 151:entitled "Grouping userboxes". 2045:விஷயங்களில் தலையிடுகிறார்கள். 1886:OK I will give it a go again. 1: 2180:character assassination spree 836:and his really sincere fans! 1387:What the! Oh, oops... okay! 986:. Does that mean anything? 914:you have violated 3RR with 182:Re:How long should we wait? 2285: 2239:actors are called by such 2204:bcoz he thought it is POV! 2139:, I'd request you to read 1129:04:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC) 1113:13:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 1103:11:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 1057:13:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 1047:05:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC) 487:13:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 473:06:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 459:01:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 449:17:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 429:13:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 406:06:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 379:13:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 362:05:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 322:12:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 313:19:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC) 292:19:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC) 282:18:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC) 252:21:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 242:21:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC) 176:02:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC) 165:10:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 156:08:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC) 100:03:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 1794:RE: eenga konjam moodalam 1253:Your notes to admin Jayjg 512:superstars in Kollywood. 149:Knowledge (XXG):Userboxes 56:17:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 45:14:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 2267:13:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2248:12:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2218:12:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2197:fancruft and hagiography 2164:12:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2089:12:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2068:12:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2050:12:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2039:08:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2020:08:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 2004:00:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1961:16:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1950:16:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1941:16:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1926:16:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1913:16:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1900:16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1800:Knowledge (XXG):Civility 1764:07:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1548:The salary is qualified 793:given. Instead, data of 1891:16:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1881:15:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1863:16:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1846:13:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1836:12:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1814:08:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1789:07:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1774:RE: Economy of Pakistan 1741:14:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1732:08:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1704:03:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1668:23:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1658:22:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1647:22:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1625:18:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1616:16:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 1579:15:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1557:00:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1543:00:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1512:07:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1485:18:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1474:17:54, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1428:19:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1414:17:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1392:16:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1382:16:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1363:07:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1329:03:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1285:03:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1266:23:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1243:00:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1234:00:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1224:13:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1210:13:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1194:00:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1180:00:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 1157:01:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC) 1026:00:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 991:09:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 960:07:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 889:02:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 860:02:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 841:14:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 806:03:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 785:02:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 766:02:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 753:02:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 726:03:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 707:02:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 696:02:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 668:02:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 653:02:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 624:02:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 607:01:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 534:'s cricinfo.com profile 528:http://aus.cricinfo.com 517:01:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 507:01:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 331: 2117:Knowledge (XXG) is not 1457:crystal clear case of 1138:Hi, Your edits to the 18:User talk:Anwar saadat 2135:. If you're a fan of 2125:an encyclopedic style 1067:Thanks for uploading 468:consider my point. -- 258:Interlanguage links ( 2127:. Also, these facts 2032:அடிப்படைக் கொள்கைகளை 761:a mega blockbuster? 1319:personal judgements 1119:Fahd Islamic School 869:and on the talk of 296:Yes, if you want a 198: 197:Acting filmography 2119:, we'd avoid some 2113:Knowledge (XXG) is 1781:CIA World Factbook 1609:User: M.arunprasad 1599:User: Naan Kadavul 1591:User: Anwar saadat 1167:this edit of yours 196: 173:Blarneytherinosaur 153:Blarneytherinosaur 145:my userbox subpage 1483: 1419:please go to the 1412: 1380: 1271:Accepted meanings 1178: 1155: 818:ajith's interview 218: 217: 97: 90: 85: 22:(Redirected from 2276: 2147:and others from 1997:Have your say!!! 1993: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1972:User:Deepujoseph 1860: 1855: 1833: 1828: 1761: 1760: 1753: 1750: 1729: 1728: 1721: 1718: 1697:Have your say!!! 1693: 1577: 1574: 1567: 1541: 1538: 1531: 1509: 1508: 1501: 1498: 1482: 1411: 1379: 1360: 1359: 1352: 1349: 1170: 1147: 1140:Economy of India 1023: 1022: 1015: 1012: 957: 956: 949: 946: 882:Have your say!!! 878: 853:Have your say!!! 849: 778:Have your say!!! 774: 750: 749: 742: 739: 719:Have your say!!! 715: 689:Have your say!!! 685: 650: 649: 642: 639: 600:Have your say!!! 596: 532:Sachin Tendulkar 500:Have your say!!! 496: 239: 234: 229: 224: 199: 93: 88: 84: 82: 76: 75: 72: 66: 27: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2028: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1977: 1976: 1873: 1858: 1853: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1796: 1776: 1758: 1757: 1751: 1748: 1726: 1725: 1719: 1716: 1691: 1678: 1635: 1587: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1524: 1506: 1505: 1499: 1496: 1407:, for a start. 1400: 1373: 1357: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1273: 1255: 1202: 1136: 1121: 1069:Image:Deena.JPG 1065: 1040: 1020: 1019: 1013: 1010: 954: 953: 947: 944: 876: 847: 772: 747: 746: 740: 737: 713: 683: 647: 646: 640: 637: 594: 494: 492:aggrandizement. 441: 337: 264: 237: 232: 227: 222: 188:Ajith talk page 184: 134: 108: 106:Image copyright 96: 73: 70: 69: 64: 42:Tux the penguin 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2282: 2280: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2193:copyright-free 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2105:Tamil language 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2053: 2052: 2027: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1975: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1932:Benzee too is 1930: 1929: 1928: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1820: 1817: 1806:hagiographical 1795: 1792: 1775: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1634: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1618: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1560: 1559: 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1491:second warning 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1372: 1371:Arbcom "votes" 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1272: 1269: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1135: 1132: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1052:Thanks a ton! 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 903: 902: 901: 900: 892: 891: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 700: 699: 698: 657: 656: 655: 632:Shah Rukh Khan 628: 627: 626: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 462: 461: 440: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 411: 410: 409: 408: 392: 391: 390: 389: 382: 381: 370: 369: 336: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 263: 256: 255: 254: 216: 215: 213: 193: 183: 180: 179: 178: 169: 168: 167: 133: 130: 123: 122: 117: 107: 104: 103: 102: 94: 59: 58: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2281: 2268: 2265: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2219: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2203: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2090: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2025: 2021: 2018: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1982: 1973: 1970: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1879: 1870: 1864: 1861: 1856: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1829: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1801: 1793: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1773: 1765: 1762: 1755: 1754: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1723: 1722: 1712: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1687: 1683: 1675: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1645: 1640: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1619: 1617: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1592: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1568: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1539: 1532: 1527:clarifies. - 1521: 1513: 1510: 1503: 1502: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1467:misjudgements 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1370: 1364: 1361: 1354: 1353: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1277: 1270: 1268: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1252: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1215:You mean you 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1118: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1073:copyright tag 1070: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1037: 1027: 1024: 1017: 1016: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 992: 989: 985: 984:3rd Vandalism 981: 980:2nd Vandalism 977: 976:1st Vandalism 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 961: 958: 951: 950: 940: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 899: 896: 895: 894: 893: 890: 887: 883: 879: 872: 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 858: 854: 850: 843: 842: 839: 838:S.GaneshKumar 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 807: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 783: 779: 775: 769: 768: 767: 764: 760: 759:Kadhal Kottai 756: 755: 754: 751: 744: 743: 733: 727: 724: 720: 716: 710: 709: 708: 705: 701: 697: 694: 690: 686: 680: 675: 671: 670: 669: 666: 662: 658: 654: 651: 644: 643: 633: 629: 625: 622: 618: 614: 608: 605: 601: 597: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 564: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 533: 529: 525: 520: 519: 518: 515: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 490: 489: 488: 485: 481: 476: 475: 474: 471: 466: 465: 464: 463: 460: 457: 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 438: 430: 427: 422: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 407: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 377: 372: 371: 366: 365: 364: 363: 360: 355: 351: 349: 348:Vijay (actor) 345: 340: 334: 333:Vijay (actor) 323: 320: 316: 315: 314: 311: 308: 304: 299: 295: 294: 293: 290: 286: 285: 284: 283: 280: 277: 273: 269: 261: 257: 253: 250: 246: 245: 244: 243: 240: 235: 230: 225: 214: 212: 210: 209: 201: 200: 194: 191: 189: 181: 177: 174: 170: 166: 163: 159: 158: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 139: 131: 129: 128: 121: 118: 116: 113: 112: 111: 105: 101: 98: 91: 86: 81: 77: 67: 61: 60: 57: 54: 49: 48: 47: 46: 43: 39: 33: 25: 19: 2264:Anwar saadat 2258: 2254: 2232: 2215:Anwar saadat 2201: 2196: 2192: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2153:encyclopedic 2152: 2128: 2109:Tamil people 2047:Anwar saadat 2029: 2015:thunderboltz 1988: 1958:Anwar saadat 1938:Anwar saadat 1910:Anwar saadat 1888:Anwar saadat 1874: 1843:Anwar saadat 1822: 1804: 1797: 1779: 1777: 1746: 1738:Anwar saadat 1714: 1679: 1655:Anwar saadat 1636: 1622:Anwar saadat 1602: 1588: 1554:Anwar saadat 1549: 1525: 1494: 1490: 1471:Anwar saadat 1466: 1463:no knowledge 1462: 1458: 1454: 1438: 1434: 1417: 1401: 1389:Anwar saadat 1374: 1345: 1326:Anwar saadat 1318: 1314: 1310: 1278: 1274: 1256: 1240:Anwar saadat 1221:Anwar saadat 1216: 1203: 1191:Anwar saadat 1186: 1160: 1137: 1122: 1110:Anwar saadat 1092: 1077: 1066: 1054:Anwar saadat 1041: 1038:RFCU on Prin 1008: 988:Anwar saadat 942: 911: 844: 816: 803:Anwar saadat 794: 790: 763:Anwar saadat 758: 735: 704:Anwar saadat 665:Anwar saadat 635: 621:Anwar saadat 616: 561: 514:Anwar saadat 484:Anwar saadat 470:M.arunprasad 456:Anwar saadat 442: 426:Anwar saadat 420: 403:M.arunprasad 398: 376:Anwar saadat 359:M.arunprasad 356: 352: 341: 338: 319:Anwar saadat 302: 297: 289:Anwar saadat 265: 249:Anwar saadat 219: 205: 203: 192: 185: 162:Anwar saadat 136: 135: 132:Userbox help 124: 109: 53:Anwar saadat 40: 37: 2259:prima facie 2145:Henry Fonda 1917:Please see 1906:User:Benzee 1665:Green Giant 1644:Green Giant 1451:Rajinikanth 1313:. Instead, 674:Rajinikanth 661:Rajinikanth 335:'s Article 305:the colon. 204:Prema Lekha 2255:Compromise 2133:verifiable 2026:Suggestion 1798:Hi again. 1294:Tamil Nadu 1126:Stanley011 932:5th Revert 928:4th Revert 924:3rd Revert 920:2nd Revert 916:1st Revert 867:Talk:Ajith 446:R.Madhavan 339:Hi Anwar, 268:Tamil Nadu 260:Tamil Nadu 2237:Kollywood 2115:and what 2084:. :-) -- 2001:review me 1978:3RR": --> 1878:InShaneee 1701:review me 1604:Attagasam 1459:vandalism 1421:Help desk 1298:elections 1200:Karnataka 1095:OrphanBot 886:review me 871:WP:INCINE 857:review me 782:review me 723:review me 693:review me 615:If I say 604:review me 504:review me 421:200th day 206:(Telugu) 34:Make sure 2241:epithets 2121:fancruft 1992:ßlηguγΣη 1854:=Nichalp 1827:=Nichalp 1819:Civility 1692:ßlηguγΣη 1686:Pakistan 1682:Hindutva 1632:Pakistan 1550:per film 1439:threaten 877:ßlηguγΣη 848:ßlηguγΣη 773:ßlηguγΣη 714:ßlηguγΣη 684:ßlηguγΣη 595:ßlηguγΣη 495:ßlηguγΣη 223:Tantalum 2172:cleanup 2157:Chennai 1956:ROTFL! 1947:Rory096 1934:blocked 1923:Rory096 1897:Rory096 1859:«Talk»= 1832:«Talk»= 1711:WP:NPOV 1566:Ganeshk 1530:Ganeshk 1453:. That 1435:blanked 1342:WP:NPOV 1217:created 672:I read 303:without 238:lluride 186:On the 2245:Sundar 2161:Sundar 2086:Sundar 2082:debate 2060:Tintin 2036:Sundar 2011:WP:3RR 1759:(Talk) 1727:(Talk) 1613:Benzee 1589:Hello 1507:(Talk) 1358:(Talk) 1231:AreJay 1207:AreJay 1044:Jayjg 1021:(Talk) 955:(Talk) 748:(Talk) 648:(Talk) 524:Wisden 482:! LOL 310:(talk) 307:Rasmus 298:normal 279:(talk) 276:Rasmus 211:(1996) 74:Jester 2233:thala 2202:Thala 2137:Ajith 1974:] 3RR 1936:now. 1752:eagle 1749:Noble 1720:eagle 1717:Noble 1522:Ajith 1500:eagle 1497:Noble 1480:Lukas 1447:Vijay 1443:Ajith 1409:Lukas 1403:Read 1377:Lukas 1351:eagle 1348:Noble 1187:inote 1172:Pamri 1163:inote 1149:Pamri 1144:inote 1014:eagle 1011:Noble 948:eagle 945:Noble 936:May 4 912:think 834:Ajith 830:Ajith 826:Ajith 822:Ajith 791:never 741:eagle 738:Noble 679:Asoka 659:Read 641:eagle 638:Noble 630:Read 480:Jathu 439:Ajith 344:Ajith 208:songs 138:(UTC) 95:Fire! 16:< 2129:must 2107:and 2064:talk 2013:. - 1980:edit 1921:. -- 1811:El_C 1809:. 1786:El_C 1684:and 1573:talk 1537:talk 1449:and 1425:Zmmz 1398:Zora 1311:ever 1282:Zora 1263:Zmmz 1259:here 1176:Talk 1153:Talk 939:2006 930:and 71:SWAT 2131:be 1638:--> 1134:EoI 934:on 89:Aim 2066:) 1999:- 1995:| 1784:. 1713:. 1699:- 1695:| 1593:, 1455:is 1445:, 1174:• 1151:• 1101:. 982:, 978:, 926:, 922:, 918:, 910:I 884:- 880:| 855:- 851:| 780:- 776:| 721:- 717:| 691:- 687:| 681:. 602:- 598:| 502:- 498:| 2062:( 1984:] 1576:) 1570:( 1540:) 1534:( 262:) 233:e 228:T 202:' 65:⇒ 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.