User talk:Aussieflagfan

420:

Queen and Country. As you probably know the bible commands believers to watch out for signs of the end of days. So the flag society might be doing all that Christian outreach stuff simply due to all the evangelicals in their ranks. And don't forget. The Australian flag is replete with Christian symbolism to begin with. I must admit I like following their Facebook page. It's all very interesting, thought provoking stuff. That's probably why they get all that publicity. Have a good look at all those well funded, space age patriotic organisations in America. There's nothing like that over here in Australia. What exactly did you expect? Some of those ANFA branches are said to be quite active and get a good roll up at meetings. But actually some of them are run out of the secretaries private home and struggle to get a quorum at their AGM too. They don't even have a branch in SA and they never have. I see there even in the blue ribband ANFA NSW branch their current president is doubling up as the secretary. The flag society looks to be doing as well or even a bit better than some branches of the parent organisation.

1351:

treasure. The federal government looks set to adopt their idea for a US-style flag pledge in schools. And here you are still debating whether they even exist? The thing is that guy they have as their spokesperson has earned a following. And having seen everything the Australian Flag Society has ever had to offer let me tell you why. It's because he's got well above average ability as a vexillologist. Good eye for quality and detail. I'm just trying to write up a bit of factual history here about something I happen to know a great deal about. The first 22 years of the tradition of Australian National Flag Day has already been. The first 17 years of the tradition of the parliament house centenary flag - that's already been and not without being noticed. So I'm just trying to bring wikipedia up to date. Get with it man. If you haven't personally sighted any of these sources why are you even here?

1161:

it that those other flag organisations have got that can possibly compete with the parliament house centenary flag? So if the newsdesk has several Flag Day media releases the flag society ends up winning out every time you see. They've got a virtual monopoly on Flag Day publicity and good luck to them. As you can see from the assorted news links ANFA QLD apparently even borrowed it from the flag society for a couple of years. According to the flag society facebook page other community groups in Queensland have also requested it. It appears to have a life all of it's own now. This is what I'm saying. The tradition of the parliament house centenary flag is going to go on and on. If now is not the time for a dedicated article on the subject it's only going to be some other day.

3028:

because I have bought some books that are on the way having seen ample opportunities to bring some of Knowledge's history and theology related articles up to date that overall percentage should increase. I'm even looking at going to some expense of my own to acquire some artwork for the Flags of the Australian Defence Force page that Knowledge can have the rights to. So granted it's taken a while to master some of these codes and inline citations and so forth. But on balance you'd really have to say having me here is keeping Knowledge where it belongs if it wants to have the confidence of the general public. And that's right on the cutting edge.

1801:

work Flag and Nation published a lithograph by an unknown artist that shows something completely different to the commissioned portrait. Since then there's been a few other new evidences to enter the loop too. And yet a lot of the community are hearing all about this from me first over ten years after the scholarly consensus that the Australian flags were all red ensigns started to change as it has become clear there were both red and blue ensigns there that day. Now I understand it might come as an initial shock to the system for some but gee wizz we all had to get with it one day.

1636:

why there can't be at least some of them in the article proper? As you can see by the number of citations this subject has been of intense interest historically and right up to the present day. It's going to be one of the central attractive points of the whole Flag of Australia article. As a matter of fact as an expert on this subject I'd have to say that it's amazing it's taken until 2018 for Knowledge to give it the full treatment it deserves. I see there that nobody has yet complained about the images I uploaded to "The Australian red ensign at war" section of the

2878:

think I will ask for a third opinion about whether the COI tag on my own page needs to remain. Even if I hadn't cashed in my FSA membership I say I've got special expertise as opposed to being close to the subject. The FIAV have a yahoo mailing list and I've even seen blokes in there talking about the need to spruce up some of these flag related articles on wikipedia. And some of them have been or are members of organisations like the FSA. I know for a fact that members of the UK Flag Institute knocked up the article on

2504:

in the way of military vexillology to maintain my interest supporting the organisation. So they have no published sources from their journal that I could possibly use to edit these articles in any event which would be the only issue. Wouldn't you have to demonstrate some sort of actual bias on my part first? Some of these contributions I have made to the articles I have edited wouldn't be very helpful to either side of these Australian flag contentions. But those are the facts.

2433:

add to the body of knowledge there. Becoming a Wikipedian looks like a more attractive option when it comes to that. It's all about promoting new Australian flags with them which I'm not that fussed about. I have thought to myself over the years it does seem like an awful lot of money to stay subscribed when you can go to the state library and read their journal there for free. I'm not the only FSA member who feels this way.

196: 3364: 3209: 3134: 3061: 2011:

made some changes I can't see what anyone could complain about now. You'd really have to say that on balance I've been good and brought it right up to date in several respects. Maybe there could still be a few more images here and there to improve the visitor experience. I'm just trying to think about it from the perspective of someone who is completely uninitiated in relation to the subject.

358:

Australian Flag Society. So that lot are not hiding their views on this subject anymore. The way things are looking now you and we all might have to confront the fact these might be the biblical end times. And if they are. This is the sort of thing you can get away with when you are on the edge of eternity mate. According to ANFA NSW they are still a secular organisation:

3294: 1979: 1893: 488: 248: 25:. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of 1435:. Get out and about in Knowledge and see how it actually works. Look at and maybe edit some other articles. Perhaps the place(s) you live, businesses, national parks, history, music, dogs, cats, wars.... Look at the editing histories and the Talk pages of those other articles. Read some more policies. Spread your wings. It will make you a better editor. 99: 1385:" ever happening where I am in Victoria. I certainly don't want it. The world does not need compulsory patriotism. What you also just wrote about the spokesperson sounds more interesting to me. These multifarious, faceless societies mean little. Name the people and what they are doing. Including the fights. That's the real story. 1027:

the Flag of Australia article. But I'm happy to propose a dedicated article on the subject again another day. Somehow I don't think we've heard the last of the flag society or their parliament house centenary flag. Let's just see where it's all at in five years time. You can't be more agreeable than that.

3027:

I could also point out that the absolute number of edits I have made might only reflect what a laborious undertaking it happened to be. By my reckoning the percentage of non flag related articles to which I have contributed over the number of flag related articles would be at or near 50 per cent. And

2780:

When it comes down to it though what's the dividing line between being close to a subject and being an expert on it? As I say there's tags on some Knowledge articles saying they need attention from an expert on the subject. Maybe we need to ask a foreigner editor with nothing whatsoever at stake here

2282:

I remember being asked about if I was involved with the other Flag Society. I only thought to mention it just now because of all these questions you get asked when you want to start a new article. Now speaking of that this article which I think would be a good idea on "Flags of the Australian Defence

2248:

I thought I should declare that I am a member of the FIAV affiliated Flag Society of Australia. Since it is an organisation dedicated to the study of vexillology in an entirely academic sort of way and not a political lobby group and I haven't used any of their sources I didn't see it being an issue.

2010:

I'm sorry if I gave that impression. There's now the realisation on my part that I should probably make these proposals for change on the talk pages in the first instance. But I've still heard a lot of complaints about that Flag of Australia page over the years. And having taken all that onboard and

1089:

As I have mentioned elsewhere, regional newspapers in particular get a lot of their content from press releases thrust at them by those seeking publicity. (I have done it myself - on completely different, non-encyclopaedic matters.) That's where I suspect the word "iconic" in their article came from.

1026:

so it was a direct quote. That newspaper article is what actually prompted my interest in doing something for wikipedia about it. What if the plan is to continue the tour around Australia? It might end up being the best known Australian flag in history. So it was already past time it was mentioned on

3335:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can

2877:

In addition I have made edits to articles in relation to matters of history and theology. The only strong opinion I have is that wikipedia should come up to date and not reflect a scholarly consensus that in relation to at least one of these Australian flag contentions was at least ten years dead. I

1934:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

1699:

I've been made well aware about the rules in relation to single use accounts. I think one thing worth considering here is that there's only so many hours in the day and only so many of them that I can devote to being a wikipedian. And I estimate that I've been good enough to devote about 72 hours of

1453:

As soon as I spruce up some of these vexillology related articles it is entirely possible I was going to. But this isn't really encouraging me though. If you get around some moderator in a third opinion they start accusing you of having a conflict of interest seems to me the way wikipedia works. Due

1350:

I'd agree with that statement. However Dr Elizabeth Kwan even mentioned the Australian Flag Society in her 2005 Flag and Nation - the seminal work on the Australian flag - in a section entitled "Flag organisations in Australia". They've only turned the parliament house centenary flag into a national

894:

You'll have to cite some examples from wikipedia where I ever attempted to do this. I've spend a lot of time finding verifiable references. I've tried to be encyclopedic and NPOV. And I'm not worried about wikipedia giving the flag society or their parliament house centenary flag a free kick. Things

682:

Well my challenge to you is to nominate what information it is that I have shared that couldn't have been gathered simply from following their facebook page alone which as I say is quite active by the standards of Australian loyalist organisations and their offshoots. There's not a week that goes by

419:

Maybe the way the 'Australian National Flag Association' works is a bit complicated. Now I've seen folks ask the flag society on facebook why they do their world war 3 watch and maintain their Australian Christian Broadcasting Facebook page. And they just tell you it's got everything to do with God,

2588:

along the same lines. So there you could have such images and there would not necessarily be the same undue weight concerns. Until someone raises a more substantial objection to me being a wikipedian I say that I be allowed to continue my work. I estimate that I have given fully 72 hours of my time

2527:

itself. So whilst I had an arguable case I was happy to let that one edit be reverted. I submit that I was just the man wikipedia was looking for to bring the Flag of Australia up to date. Previously it didn't even mention the Australian moon flag. You surely can't be serious about wanting it to go

2503:

I would want to dispute that. For not only have my contributions been encyclopedic and extremely well referenced. After drwaing your asttention to this matter I have this day decided to email the FSA resigning my membership. And the reason for that is simply because they have done virtually nothing

2132:

when there are disputes. When an edit is reverted in good faith, it's not appropriate to restore disputed content to the article as you have done a few times now. Instead the disputed edits are discussed on the article's talk page and while this is happening, the article, or section of the article,

1827:

I've even seen that lithograph I mention posted on facebook and folks reacting with anger saying it has to be altered or a pure fraud. Just has to be. And yet any time they like these suspicious minds can make an appointment to view it where it is held at the Mitchell Library in Sydney and has been

1635:

I think you'll find that I have been making contributions to non flag related articles. In relation to the "Australian flag at war" section. Whilst a lot of these images are contained in the assorted links for anyone who may wish to branch off and do some more in depth research. Is there any reason

1160:

If the issue is notability then let's face it. If you type the headline "Iconic flag to tour Warwick" into google you'll see that story was only syndicated all over the countryside. Of course the newspapers and TV stations are going to bite on their Flag Day media releases. For this reason. What is

581:

It might appear that way but I'd like to know what the conflict of interest is supposed to be. I've only been trying to give wikipedia the benefit of what I know about flags. I've been researching the Australian Flag Society and their parliament house centenary flag simply because I find them to be

2432:

Well the financial year has only just ended hasn't it? So my membership had lapsed and was up for renewal at the time. But I'd happily cash it in at this point if required because as a military vexillologist I'm a little bit disappointed with the FSA. They've done precisely nothing to preserve and

2168:

I understand and have now referred it to the dispute resolution noticeboard. I see there are two images in the debate section which itself has its own page. And the Australian flag at war is one of the most argued about sub contentions within that debate which was even front page news in Australia

2992:

talk page the other party has so far failed to act on the outcome. So who has shown respect for Knowledge and its orderly processes there and who hasn't? I realise that some of these edits I have made involve matters where the scholarly consensus has been overturned in the last decade. But please

2551:

The high use of military images, is a clear demonstration that the edits you are making are for the purpose of pushing an external agenda in relation to Flag debate. I have just asked you to do this, additionally others have asked you to edit in other areas, your language is very clearly with the

1800:

what you have is a whole heap of people out there with only a shallow, partisan interest in the subject who don't really know what they are talking about. Take the sub contention about what colour the Australian flags were at the opening of old parliament house. Elizabeth Kwan in her 2006 seminal

1795:

Well now I have taken to starting up threads on the talk pages and trying to engage folks entirely constructively. Maybe I was a bit snide once or twice. But the problem is that some of these sources I'm bringing to the attention of the community are a bit shocking and jarring at first until the

357:

I'm not defending the byzantine workings of the Australian National Flag Association to you. They appear to be five different ships sailing in five separate directions. However the about tab on the Australian Christian Broadcasting facebook page even tells the whole thing is an initiative of the

2854:

you need to expand into areas where you dont hold such strong opinions, learn how to write in an objective neutral way about subjects. As for COI tags, yes there too many already normally people who persist get shown the door because we dont have the time to keep up with the issues they cause.

2696:

I've actually seen flag related articles before with a tag saying they need attention "from an expert on the subject". And what sort of people would wikipedia be soliciting help from there? The procedure that should be followed when someone declares they are or have been involved in the sort of

334:

You may know what the connection is between Australian Christian Broadcasting and the ANFA ACT/Australian Flag Society branch, but most of the world doesn't. Want to put it in the article? And if the other branches disagree about that divinity thing, surely that should be in the article. Do you

2744:

You are talking to yourself. This page is for conversation, not dissertation. Again, you really need to get away from this topic and see how Talk pages are used elsewhere on Knowledge. Your contributions here are achieving nothing. And as for the COI, the offence is editing when you have an

1297:

There's no conflict of interest. There's not one thing I have contributed to wikipedia that's not already out there. Please advise where can I lodge a complaint about this. You're the person who hasn't acted on the outcome of the third opinion regarding the Australian Flag Society article.

2359:

There's two flag societies in Australia. The one I am with is the Flag Society of Australia and is affiliated with the FIAV. They're all about the study of flags in a pure sense and have no Knowledge article that I know of. The other one is the Australian Flag Society. They've delved into

3146:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3073:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1565:

has suggested on the article's talk page that you pause in your attention to Australian flag related articles, and look at the rest of Knowledge, to see what is normal and acceptable. Knowledge is an encyclopaedia, not a flag fansite and your contributions to the article, and

1420:. You're arguing with experienced editors who have seen this potential SPA/COI stuff many times before and they're trying to steer you away from potential issues should they be proven right. I hope this helps. Spread your wings, Knowledge is a big place. It often helps. -- 315:

The source was the Australian Christian Broadcasting facebook page. So isn't that an initiative of the ANFA ACT/Australian Flag Society branch? I've seen the other branches proudly make the claim they are secular with no paid staff on their membership forms.

909:

I really can't be bothered trawling through all your work at this stage, but one example I do recall was describing a flag as "iconic". That's marketing slang. It's not non-neutral. Now, don't tell us that's what the source said. It may have, but we don't.

2249:

I haven't had any correspondence with them for a long time and as their journal is available at all the state libraries I will gladly resign my membership if that's what is necessary in order that I may keep contributing to flag related articles Knowledge.

2488:

Given your declaration, and nature of the flag dispute externally to Knowledge it is clear that you should no longer edit any articles or content related to the Australian flag. Also all edits you have previous made to the topic should now be reverted.

2083:

As easy as wikipedia makes it for folks to get involved reading umpteen magazine articles over the years that say something different to what's in the article doesn't mean they cut them out and kept them to use them as citations though. Luckily I have.

2657:

carried a tag saying someone close to the subject had been a major contributor then I can tell you that would be an enormous number of tags. As long as you use independent sources what's the issue? They're just the people Knowledge is looking for.

1828:

for a long time before what colour the flags it depicts actually were in real life became an issue. This is what we who would like to see wikipedia remain on the cutting edge are up against. But I know we should all just stay calm and be civil.

222:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1730:

You really don't get it, do you? The idea of looking and working on other articles is so that you become a better editor BEFORE you do all your work on Australian flag articles. There is no rush to tackle that particular set of articles.

1458:

article that doesn't even mention the centenary year celebrations. How about that? Some of you folks don't seem to have wikipedia's best interests at heart to me. If you haven't sighted any of these sources then why are you even here?

2114:

I think it would be good for you to act in good faith and stop editing the article and restore it to the version before you made the complaint. At the moment it appears as if you have acted to stifle others so you can get your way.

67:, which would lead to a binding resolution, but that's considered a fairly high-level form of dispute resolution. I would generally recommend other options, but if the other editor won't engage than your hands may be tied. Cheers. 469: 219: 2552:

intent to promote. Again given you have acknowledged a very clear bias/coi I recommend that you refrain from editing content about the Australian flag and related subjects, should you see something that needs fixing please use

2522:

If the only bias related issue to date is that I once described the Australian National Flag Association as a loyal society then that's not much. Because I was just going off the definition provided by the wikipedia article on

1858:

Precisely. It appears to me that you are arguing with someone, but it's not clear who, and it isn't anyone here, nor is it clear what you are fighting over. Just work on creating excellent encyclopaedic content. Have a read of

704:

I'm just very well informed about the subject of Australian flags. In fact I'm just the sort of person wikipedia is looking for. Some of these vexillology related articles are now hum dingers compared to the state I found them

1231:

Again, you seem more excited about competition between flag supporters than anything else. Maybe you need to write an article on that. Have you noticed how little interest you are getting from other Knowledge editors?

226:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1777:

tags when they might appear on your page.. A good gauge of your experience here would be to consider something other than flags, and get a hang of what happens outside the zone of comfort and flags... enjoy.

62:

I understand your frustration, but 3O won't be able to help you if there isn't a thorough discussion at the Talk page. If all else fails in terms of getting other editors to engage, you may wish to consider an

3407: 3252: 3174: 3101: 1605:

You really need to start discussing your edits before you make them. Several people have edited the article today and comments about your edits have generally been negaitive. Please familiarise yourself with

388:

I'm not asking anyone to defend anything. I want an encyclopaedia that explains things clearly. Right now, I'm very confused. And I cannot see how the flag and end times have anything to do with one another.

759:

I'm not so sure about that. I'm concerned the "fan" part of your username too often overrides the knowledge part. Our goal is objectivity, not hype about how great the flag is and how we should all love it.

2861:... experienced editors often scrutinize the editing activities of new editors and single-purpose accounts to determine whether they are here to build an encyclopedia (perhaps needing help and advice)...' 1700:

my time to wikipedia so far. I think I've got a lot to offer in relation to many history related articles in particular and I hope to keep editing an increasingly wider range of articles as time goes by.

2900:

Please point us at those non-flag related edits. A few days ago I found three, on two articles, out of nearly 450 total edits you had made to Knowledge. Your user name and behaviour really do indicate a

2360:

vexillological research too but are unaffiliated with the FIAV and it seems to me are mainly a bunch of Christian fundamentalists on about God, Queen and Country and really just waiting for the rapture.

1757:

I am very sorry to disappoint you, but by the various editors coming to this talk page, I think that you show little sign of actually understanding what it is to be a member of the community -and what

2928:

and there will be a lot more non flag related edits forthcoming I promise you. I'm really enjoying being a wikipedian now. Of course I've taken this advice onboard. Actually I see that the tag on the

3391:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3236:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3158:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3085:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 472:

and the above discussion, as well as earlier edits, I think that it's very clear that you have a conflict of interest with the Australian Flag Society. As such, you need to follow the below rules.

1990:, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the 1673:." Hardly. I see three non-flag related edits, on two articles, out of 443 edits in total, in your entire edit history. No, you really need to get out more. See the big wide "Knowledge" world. 120: 840:

No. That's not your only goal. It's clear that your goals also include convincing others that a national love of the flag is important. And it's that obvious perspective of yours that

3377: 3222: 2654: 2831:

This is not the place to debate policy. Have you notice that several people have suggested that you pause on Aussie flag articles, and get out and see the rest of Knowledge? Do it!

2141:

to make appropriate edits or to exclude the edits. For now you should be continuing to discuss the issue on the article's talk page but please, leave the article itself alone. --

1796:

realisation finally sets in that they are all 100% verifiable. The problem with Australian vexillology and Australian military vexillology in particular is that because of the

2905:. This, combined with a refusal to accept advice from more experienced editors, and an arrogance that you are on the right track, are unlikely to lead to a great future here. 2745:

undisclosed conflict of interest. How you edited is irrelevant. It's like driving when drunk. How you drive is irrelevant. Being drunk is the problem. 23:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

1022:

I would argue that in Australian terms it is iconic. And like it or not the last time it was displayed on Flag Day the headline actually was "Iconic flag to tour Warwick"

492: 1511:

Well I'm sorry. But I'm only here to help. Some of these articles I'm looking at really do need to be shown some love by folks who know about that sort of things though.

1416:

your argument in any way, and perhaps to cool off from potential conflict, maybe try editing a different category of articles before somebody dare accuse you of being a

116: 570:

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see

1579: 2619:

I was actually going to go to some expense of my own to arrange some high quality artwork of all the rank flags and so forth and give the copyright to wikipedia.

2169:

back when Paul Keating and Alexander Downer were there. So I would have thought some imagery there would not be out of the question. How many and what of though?

2215:

You've certainly referred it to DRN but there are errors in your referral and you haven't followed the instructions there. One in bold is immediately obvious. --

1561:, articles are not supposed to be image farms. Multiple examples of how the flag has been flown at different events do not provide any encyclopaedic content. 1578:

should have given you some idea of what we expect from, and what does and doesn't make a good article. Please also note that this issue has been raised at

1575: 203: 187: 105: 90: 2580:

What agenda would that be? You're allowed to have a legitimate interest in military vexillology in a pure sense. I see there that there is an article on

1765:

might indicate... your understanding of wikipedia, and your responses to the various editors who come here show you should take very careful reading of

1094:" has no place in Knowledge. It seems you are particularly excited about this flag. That's fine, but you must not let it influence your editing here. 208: 582:

one of the more interesting developments on the Australian vexillological scene in the last two decades. And I'm going to go on researching them too.

2111: 2924:

I've been made well aware of rules about single use accounts and as you can see in the last 24 hours I have made a contribution to the article on

2581: 2264:

I am more concerned that not long ago you told us that the only organisation you were a member of was your local RSL. Sounds like you were lying.

2932:

didn't stand for very long. If anything foreign editors with no stake whatsoever in these Australian related articles tend to see things my way.

2697:

organisation that the FSA is is that you advise them about the need to use independent sources then you wait to see how they conduct themselves.

2653:

And if every flag related article that had some input from folks who are or had at one time been involved with organisations affiliated with the

1986:, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Knowledge. This means that editors 1996:

your comments on the talk page of the article have indicate an intent to ignore consensus, and disrupt wikipedia neither which will be tolerated

44:

I don't know if the other user is willing to enter into any more correspondence though. I've proposed a few different solutions now to no avail.

571: 273:

Your edit summary, "I can't think of anything else if the other editor won't acknowledge the third opinion", gives the appearance that you are

1485:. The suggestion about looking elsewhere isn't for later. It's for now. I truly think it would improve your editing on flag related articles. 2882:. If you tagged every flag related article that has major contributions for people in my situation that would be an enormous number of tags. 2585: 300:

Why do you want to put the text about the divinity of the flag under the ACT Branch heading? Is the divinity view exclusive to that branch?

259:

without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate

3430: 3313:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

3274: 3188: 3115: 1912:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

577:

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

3298: 1897: 496: 3337: 1936: 798:

If you claim to care about wikipedia why stand in the way of someone who only wants to bring these start class articles up to date?

3426: 3270: 3184: 3111: 563: 134: 86: 543: 505: 263:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1645:

As opposed to being a disruptive presence I put it to you that on the contrary I'm just the man Knowledge was looking for.

1482: 130: 3400: 3245: 3167: 3094: 1455: 1409: 3412: 3257: 3179: 3106: 510: 2781:

what they think about this situation? The FSA do profess absolute neutrality in these Australian flag contentions.

1860: 652:

That seems very difficult to believe, given your knowledge. So who ARE the members of the Australian Flag Society?

212: 2329:

What is FIAV, and the Flag Society of Australia? Is the latter related to anything Knowledge has an article on?

1023: 1381:

Who is Dr Elizabeth Kwan? You write as if everyone knows and everyone cares. Most don't. There is no hope of "

1279:

edit is a clear violation of the terms set out in the above warning. You will be reported if this continues.

2989: 2330: 256: 2471:

I was having a few long, dark nights of the soul about renewing it last year too. 23:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

2227: 2153: 1991: 1797: 1626: 1594: 964:

One thing they clearly don't have any trouble with is getting publicity. It doesn't depend on wikipedia.

3388: 3302: 3233: 3155: 3082: 2553: 1905: 1637: 1567: 530: 2584:. So the solution I have proposed is that I and whoever else wants to contribute prepare an article on 2390:

Thank you. Now would you care to clarify your comment at 10:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC) in the section head "

1939:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 3310: 2030: 1909: 500: 2867: 2560: 2493: 2138: 2134: 2119: 2001: 2283:

Force". The last three words are presently in lower case. How does one change that to upper case?

3029: 2994: 2933: 2883: 2782: 2698: 2659: 2620: 2590: 2529: 2505: 2434: 2361: 2284: 2250: 2170: 2085: 2050: 2012: 1958: 1829: 1802: 1701: 1650: 1528: 1460: 1352: 1299: 1162: 1028: 965: 896: 799: 726: 627: 587: 441: 363: 317: 49: 495:

your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things

3371: 3345: 3325:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 3314: 3216: 3142: 3069: 2929: 2216: 2142: 1983: 1947: 1924:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1913: 1901: 1615: 1583: 1554: 264: 260: 72: 34: 503:(COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 267:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 3419: 3384: 3264: 3229: 3151: 3078: 2963: 2910: 2403: 2338: 2310: 2269: 2196: 2062: 1868: 1736: 1678: 1490: 1440: 1390: 1329: 1284: 1237: 1099: 915: 853: 765: 657: 609: 477: 394: 340: 305: 286: 268: 232: 171: 3399:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3244:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3166:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3093:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1582:. Please, by all means join the discussion there and ask questions if you need guidance. -- 3329: 2034: 1928: 1779: 1762: 274: 129:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can 3396: 3306: 3241: 3163: 3090: 2879: 2864: 2557: 2490: 2116: 1998: 841: 553: 1671:

I think you'll find that I have been making contributions to non flag related articles

3392: 3237: 3159: 3086: 2902: 2856: 2191:

The place to discuss content of an article is the Talk page of an article, not here.

2129: 1987: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1758: 1432: 1421: 1417: 64: 520:

articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;

3341: 1940: 1611: 1571: 1481:

It seems it's time to draw your attention to another one of Knowledge's policies -

68: 30: 26: 22: 3363: 3208: 3133: 3060: 846:

All encyclopedic content on Knowledge must be written from a neutral point of view

153: 2959: 2906: 2399: 2334: 2306: 2265: 2192: 2058: 1864: 1732: 1674: 1562: 1486: 1436: 1386: 1325: 1280: 1233: 1095: 911: 849: 761: 653: 605: 473: 390: 336: 301: 281: 252: 228: 164: 2057:", could you please suggest to the complainers that they do their own editing? 2988:

I furthermore note that in relation to the third opinion I called for at the

1024:

https://www.warwickdailynews.com.au/news/iconic-flag-to-tour-warwick/3215346/

3434: 3349: 3318: 3278: 3192: 3119: 3037: 3002: 2967: 2941: 2891: 2870: 2790: 2706: 2667: 2628: 2598: 2563: 2537: 2513: 2496: 2442: 2407: 2369: 2342: 2314: 2292: 2273: 2258: 2233: 2200: 2178: 2159: 2122: 2093: 2066: 2037: 2020: 2004: 1966: 1951: 1917: 1872: 1837: 1810: 1782: 1740: 1709: 1682: 1658: 1607: 1600: 1536: 1494: 1468: 1444: 1425: 1394: 1360: 1333: 1307: 1288: 1241: 1170: 1103: 1036: 973: 919: 904: 857: 807: 769: 734: 661: 635: 613: 595: 481: 449: 398: 371: 344: 325: 309: 290: 236: 180: 126: 76: 57: 38: 470:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Parliament house centenary flag (Australia)

220:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Parliament house centenary flag (Australia)

3309:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere, 2305:

The place to discuss content of an article is on the article's Talk page.

2133:

is left in the state it was before the disputed edits were made. i.e. the

1908:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere, 3317:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

2993:

don't shoot the messenger. I can't help it that the world keeps turning.

2524: 1916:

at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and

683:

they don't offer you something: www.facebook.com/Australian.Flag.Society.

604:

How about "editing or creating articles about...your...organization..."?

3403:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3293: 3248:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3170:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3097:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1978: 1892: 487: 247: 133:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3381:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3226:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

125:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

2925: 1982:

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to

98: 359: 152:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2137:

remains. Editors should not be editing the section until there is

1769:. Also to actually take close consideration of what happens when 108:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3416:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3261:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1580:

Knowledge:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Flag of Australia

3406:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

3251:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

3173:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3100:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1092:

It might end up being the best known Australian flag in history

3375:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3323:

copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution

1922:

copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution

3301:

to Knowledge. It appears that you copied or moved text from

2128:

I'd like to add that we generally follow a process call the

1900:

to Knowledge. It appears that you copied or moved text from

97: 3288:

Copying within Knowledge requires attribution (2nd request)

2055:

complaints about that Flag of Australia page over the years

141:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

3220:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

626:

The only organisation I belong to is my local RSL club.

3387:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3232:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3154:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3081:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2655:

International Federation of Vexillological Associations

2396:

The only organisation I belong to is my local RSL club.

1994:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

1863:. It explains that it not our job to win battles here. 1558: 1276: 201:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

154: 144: 21:

Please be aware that I have removed your submission at

552:

to your organization's website in other articles (see

2110:

Hi I was made aware of the discussion you raised at

1408:

FYI, information on dispute resolution is available

207:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

255:. I noticed that you recently removed content from 335:actually realise how confusing all this stuff is? 3336:read more about the procedure and the reasons at 542:your COI when discussing affected articles (see 526:on the talk pages of affected articles (see the 277:. That is an unacceptable practice on Knowledge. 1412:. Can I just add that your choice of username 1887:Copying within Knowledge requires attribution 8: 2556:for changes to be made by a 3rd party edit. 1957:I'll note that for future reference thanks. 1431:I strongly support that recommendation from 895:like that advertise themselves anyway mate. 1576:Parliament house centenary flag (Australia) 1553:I suggest that you read the edit hstory at 1324:" that simply doesn't belong in Knowledge. 204:Parliament house centenary flag (Australia) 188:Parliament house centenary flag (Australia) 106:Parliament house centenary flag (Australia) 91:Parliament house centenary flag (Australia) 3358: 3203: 1454:to this obstruction wikipedia now has an 162:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge! 2112:Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard 123:to see how you can improve the article. 2582:Flags of the United States Armed Forces 513:for more information. We ask that you: 2958:That's a really silly claim to make. 2859:hopefully you are falling within the 2586:Flags of the Australian Defence Force 119:. You may like to take a look at the 115:, which is recorded on the article's 7: 3372:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 3217:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 3143:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3140:Hello, Aussieflagfan. Voting in the 3070:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3067:Hello, Aussieflagfan. Voting in the 2398:" Are you telling us the truth yet? 29:. Thank you for your understanding. 3355:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 275:disrupting the page to make a point 209:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 3338:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 3200:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 3127:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3054:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 1937:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge 842:Knowledge's policies on neutrality 14: 1383:a US-style flag pledge in schools 218:The article will be discussed at 111:The article has been assessed as 3362: 3292: 3207: 3132: 3059: 1977: 1891: 486: 360:https://www.anfa-national.org.au 246: 194: 3410:and submit your choices on the 3255:and submit your choices on the 3177:and submit your choices on the 3104:and submit your choices on the 2528:back to the way it was before? 1320:There's an awful lot of stuff " 848:". Do have a think about that. 506:conflict of interest guideline 1: 3435:00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 3389:Knowledge arbitration process 3279:00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 3234:Knowledge arbitration process 3193:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3156:Knowledge arbitration process 3120:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3083:Knowledge arbitration process 2130:"BOLD, revert, discuss cycle" 1483:Knowledge:No personal attacks 499:on Knowledge, you may have a 468:In light of your comments at 3350:14:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC) 1456:Australian National Flag Day 562:to comply with Knowledge's 3455: 3427:MediaWiki message delivery 3321:to the copied page, e.g., 3271:MediaWiki message delivery 3185:MediaWiki message delivery 3112:MediaWiki message delivery 1920:to the copied page, e.g., 77:14:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 58:06:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC) 39:13:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC) 1537:22:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC) 518:avoid editing or creating 491:Hello, Aussieflagfan. We 3424:to your user talk page. 3269:to your user talk page. 3038:01:04, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 3033: 3003:00:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 2998: 2968:00:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 2942:00:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 2937: 2892:11:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 2887: 2871:10:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 2791:10:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 2786: 2707:19:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2702: 2668:18:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2663: 2629:14:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2624: 2599:14:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2594: 2564:14:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2538:14:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2533: 2514:14:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2509: 2497:14:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 2443:22:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2438: 2408:22:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2370:22:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2365: 2343:22:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2315:22:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2293:22:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2288: 2274:21:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2259:21:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2254: 2234:09:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2201:08:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2179:08:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2174: 2160:07:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2123:06:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2094:08:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 2089: 2067:01:09, 2 July 2018 (UTC) 2038:00:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC) 2021:14:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 2016: 2005:14:04, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1967:13:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1962: 1952:13:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1873:23:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 1838:22:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 1833: 1811:22:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 1806: 1783:14:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1741:23:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 1710:21:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC) 1705: 1683:00:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC) 1659:09:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1654: 1601:08:23, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 1574:. Your experiences with 1532: 1495:08:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 1469:05:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 1464: 1445:22:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1426:08:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1395:22:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1361:14:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1356: 1334:11:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1308:08:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1303: 1289:08:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1242:22:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1171:14:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1166: 1104:11:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1037:11:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1032: 974:09:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 969: 920:09:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 905:09:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 900: 858:09:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 808:08:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 803: 770:12:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 735:12:05, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 730: 662:10:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 636:10:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 631: 614:10:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 596:10:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 591: 482:09:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 450:11:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 445: 399:09:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 372:08:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 367: 345:08:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 326:08:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 321: 310:08:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 291:04:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 237:22:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 211:or whether it should be 181:02:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 155:leaving us some feedback 131:create articles yourself 53: 2990:Australian Flag Society 2331:Australian Flag Society 2053:- Regarding all those " 257:Australian Flag Society 2903:single purpose account 2550:<edit conflict: --> 1798:Australian flag debate 1418:single purpose account 497:you have written about 102: 3385:Arbitration Committee 3369:Hello! Voting in the 3311:Knowledge's licensing 3303:Australian Red Ensign 3230:Arbitration Committee 3214:Hello! Voting in the 3152:Arbitration Committee 3079:Arbitration Committee 2589:to wikipedia so far. 2554:Template:Request edit 1910:Knowledge's licensing 1906:Australian Red Ensign 1638:Australian red ensign 1568:Australian Red Ensign 844:prohibit. I quote - " 511:FAQ for organizations 135:Articles for Creation 101: 87:Articles for creation 17:Third opinion decline 2392:Conflict of interest 1570:, have largely been 501:conflict of interest 464:Conflict of interest 1988:do not own articles 1861:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS 1557:. As was indicated 85:Your submission at 3401:arbitration policy 3299:your contributions 3246:arbitration policy 3168:arbitration policy 3095:arbitration policy 1898:your contributions 1090:Speculation like " 103: 27:dispute resolution 3442: 3441: 3437: 3285: 3284: 2930:Flag of Australia 1984:Flag of Australia 1902:Flag of Australia 1555:Flag of Australia 1549:Flag of Australia 93:has been accepted 3446: 3425: 3423: 3366: 3359: 3340:. Thank you. — 3334: 3328: 3324: 3296: 3268: 3211: 3204: 3136: 3063: 2223: 2220: 2149: 2146: 2029:get a handle on 1981: 1945: 1933: 1927: 1923: 1895: 1622: 1619: 1590: 1587: 564:content policies 535: 529: 490: 250: 198: 197: 178: 168: 157: 147: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3417: 3357: 3332: 3326: 3322: 3290: 3262: 3202: 3197: 3196: 3137: 3129: 3124: 3123: 3064: 3056: 2742: 2741:SLOW DOWN!!!!!! 2246: 2244:COI declaration 2230: 2221: 2218: 2156: 2147: 2144: 2108: 1975: 1943: 1931: 1925: 1921: 1889: 1629: 1620: 1617: 1597: 1588: 1585: 1551: 1414:isn't assisting 533: 527: 524:propose changes 466: 298: 244: 199: 195: 192: 183: 177: 172: 166: 143: 137:if you prefer. 95: 19: 12: 11: 5: 3452: 3450: 3440: 3439: 3408:the candidates 3378:eligible users 3367: 3356: 3353: 3307:Flags Act 1953 3297:Thank you for 3289: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3253:the candidates 3223:eligible users 3212: 3201: 3198: 3175:the candidates 3138: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3125: 3102:the candidates 3065: 3058: 3057: 3055: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2895: 2894: 2880:Graham Bartram 2874: 2873: 2863:aspect of it. 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2740: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2517: 2516: 2500: 2499: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2277: 2276: 2245: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2228: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2163: 2162: 2154: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2033:for that one. 2024: 2023: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1896:Thank you for 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1662: 1661: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1627: 1595: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1448: 1447: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1292: 1291: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 693: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 619: 618: 617: 616: 599: 598: 584: 583: 568: 567: 557: 547: 537: 521: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 350: 349: 348: 347: 329: 328: 297: 294: 243: 240: 193: 191: 186:Nomination of 184: 173: 160: 159: 150: 121:grading scheme 110: 96: 94: 83: 82: 81: 80: 79: 46: 45: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3451: 3438: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3421: 3415: 3414: 3409: 3404: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3380: 3379: 3374: 3373: 3368: 3365: 3361: 3360: 3354: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3331: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3295: 3287: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3266: 3260: 3259: 3254: 3249: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3225: 3224: 3219: 3218: 3213: 3210: 3206: 3205: 3199: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3176: 3171: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3148: 3145: 3144: 3135: 3126: 3122: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3062: 3053: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3030:Aussieflagfan 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2995:Aussieflagfan 2991: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2934:Aussieflagfan 2931: 2927: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884:Aussieflagfan 2881: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2853: 2852: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2783:Aussieflagfan 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2743: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699:Aussieflagfan 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2660:Aussieflagfan 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2621:Aussieflagfan 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591:Aussieflagfan 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2565: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530:Aussieflagfan 2526: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506:Aussieflagfan 2502: 2501: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2487: 2486: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2435:Aussieflagfan 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2362:Aussieflagfan 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285:Aussieflagfan 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2251:Aussieflagfan 2243: 2235: 2231: 2225: 2224: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2171:Aussieflagfan 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2140: 2136: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2113: 2105: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086:Aussieflagfan 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051:Aussieflagfan 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2039: 2036: 2032: 2031:WP:NOTGALLERY 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2013:Aussieflagfan 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1980: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959:Aussieflagfan 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1942: 1938: 1930: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1894: 1886: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830:Aussieflagfan 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1803:Aussieflagfan 1799: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1784: 1781: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702:Aussieflagfan 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651:Aussieflagfan 1649: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1630: 1624: 1623: 1613: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1548: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529:Aussieflagfan 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461:Aussieflagfan 1457: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1433:User:Longhair 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1353:Aussieflagfan 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300:Aussieflagfan 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163:Aussieflagfan 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029:Aussieflagfan 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 975: 971: 967: 966:Aussieflagfan 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 921: 917: 913: 908: 907: 906: 902: 898: 897:Aussieflagfan 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 809: 805: 801: 800:Aussieflagfan 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 771: 767: 763: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 736: 732: 728: 727:Aussieflagfan 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 637: 633: 629: 628:Aussieflagfan 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 615: 611: 607: 603: 602: 601: 600: 597: 593: 589: 588:Aussieflagfan 586: 585: 580: 579: 578: 575: 573: 565: 561: 558: 555: 551: 550:avoid linking 548: 545: 541: 538: 532: 525: 522: 519: 516: 515: 514: 512: 508: 507: 502: 498: 494: 489: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 463: 451: 447: 443: 442:Aussieflagfan 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 373: 369: 365: 364:Aussieflagfan 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 346: 342: 338: 333: 332: 331: 330: 327: 323: 319: 318:Aussieflagfan 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 295: 293: 292: 288: 284: 283: 278: 276: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 249: 241: 239: 238: 234: 230: 224: 221: 216: 214: 210: 206: 205: 189: 185: 182: 179: 176: 170: 163: 156: 151: 148: 146: 140: 139: 138: 136: 132: 128: 122: 118: 114: 109: 107: 100: 92: 88: 84: 78: 74: 70: 66: 61: 60: 59: 55: 51: 50:Aussieflagfan 48: 47: 43: 42: 41: 40: 36: 32: 28: 24: 16: 3411: 3405: 3382: 3376: 3370: 3315:edit summary 3291: 3256: 3250: 3227: 3221: 3215: 3178: 3172: 3149: 3141: 3139: 3105: 3099: 3076: 3068: 3066: 2860: 2855:Please read 2739: 2395: 2394:". It says " 2391: 2247: 2217: 2143: 2109: 2054: 1995: 1992:welcome page 1976: 1914:edit summary 1890: 1670: 1616: 1604: 1584: 1552: 1413: 1407: 1382: 1321: 1091: 845: 576: 569: 560:do your best 559: 549: 539: 531:request edit 523: 517: 504: 485: 467: 299: 296:Weird revert 280: 272: 269:my talk page 261:edit summary 245: 225: 217: 202: 200: 190:for deletion 174: 161: 142: 124: 112: 104: 20: 3413:voting page 3258:voting page 3180:voting page 3107:voting page 544:WP:DISCLOSE 251:Hello, I'm 113:Start-Class 3397:topic bans 3242:topic bans 3164:topic bans 3091:topic bans 2135:status quo 2035:JarrahTree 1780:JarrahTree 1572:disruptive 536:template); 3393:site bans 3238:site bans 3160:site bans 3087:site bans 2139:consensus 1973:July 2018 1608:MOS:IMAGE 1322:out there 145:help desk 127:Knowledge 117:talk page 2525:loyalism 1763:WP:ABOUT 1640:article. 1422:Longhair 540:disclose 242:May 2018 3420:NoACEMM 3342:Diannaa 3319:linking 3265:NoACEMM 2333:maybe? 2106:dispute 1941:Diannaa 1918:linking 572:WP:PAID 554:WP:SPAM 493:welcome 265:sandbox 213:deleted 69:DonIago 31:DonIago 3330:copied 2960:HiLo48 2926:Isaiah 2907:HiLo48 2857:WP:SPA 2400:HiLo48 2335:HiLo48 2307:HiLo48 2266:HiLo48 2222:Legend 2219:Aussie 2193:HiLo48 2148:Legend 2145:Aussie 2059:HiLo48 1929:copied 1865:HiLo48 1775:WP:OWN 1771:WP:SPA 1767:WP:AGF 1759:WP:NOT 1733:HiLo48 1675:HiLo48 1621:Legend 1618:Aussie 1610:, and 1589:Legend 1586:Aussie 1563:HiLo48 1487:HiLo48 1437:HiLo48 1387:HiLo48 1326:HiLo48 1281:Nick-D 1234:HiLo48 1096:HiLo48 912:HiLo48 850:HiLo48 762:HiLo48 654:HiLo48 606:HiLo48 474:Nick-D 391:HiLo48 337:HiLo48 302:HiLo48 282:C.Fred 253:C.Fred 229:Nick-D 65:WP:RFC 3305:into 2868:garra 2561:garra 2494:garra 2120:garra 2002:garra 1904:into 1612:WP:IG 23:WP:3O 3431:talk 3383:The 3346:talk 3275:talk 3228:The 3189:talk 3150:The 3116:talk 3077:The 3034:talk 2999:talk 2964:talk 2938:talk 2911:talk 2888:talk 2865:Gnan 2787:talk 2703:talk 2664:talk 2625:talk 2595:talk 2558:Gnan 2534:talk 2510:talk 2491:Gnan 2439:talk 2404:talk 2366:talk 2339:talk 2311:talk 2289:talk 2270:talk 2255:talk 2197:talk 2175:talk 2117:Gnan 2090:talk 2063:talk 2017:talk 1999:Gnan 1963:talk 1948:talk 1869:talk 1834:talk 1807:talk 1773:and 1761:and 1737:talk 1706:talk 1679:talk 1655:talk 1614:. -- 1559:here 1533:talk 1491:talk 1465:talk 1441:talk 1410:here 1391:talk 1357:talk 1330:talk 1304:talk 1285:talk 1277:This 1238:talk 1167:talk 1100:talk 1033:talk 970:talk 916:talk 901:talk 854:talk 804:talk 766:talk 731:talk 658:talk 632:talk 610:talk 592:talk 574:). 509:and 478:talk 446:talk 395:talk 368:talk 341:talk 322:talk 306:talk 287:talk 233:talk 73:talk 54:talk 35:talk 1935:at 705:in. 165:Ant 3433:) 3422:}} 3418:{{ 3395:, 3348:) 3333:}} 3327:{{ 3277:) 3267:}} 3263:{{ 3240:, 3191:) 3183:. 3162:, 3118:) 3110:. 3089:, 3036:) 3001:) 2966:) 2940:) 2890:) 2789:) 2705:) 2666:) 2627:) 2597:) 2536:) 2512:) 2441:) 2406:) 2368:) 2341:) 2313:) 2291:) 2272:) 2257:) 2232:) 2199:) 2177:) 2158:) 2092:) 2065:) 2019:) 1965:) 1950:) 1944:🍁 1932:}} 1926:{{ 1871:) 1836:) 1809:) 1739:) 1708:) 1681:) 1657:) 1631:) 1599:) 1535:) 1493:) 1467:) 1443:) 1424:\ 1393:) 1359:) 1332:) 1306:) 1287:) 1240:) 1169:) 1102:) 1035:) 972:) 918:) 903:) 856:) 806:) 768:) 733:) 660:) 634:) 612:) 594:) 556:); 546:); 534:}} 528:{{ 480:) 448:) 397:) 370:) 362:. 343:) 324:) 308:) 289:) 271:. 235:) 215:. 89:: 75:) 56:) 37:) 3429:( 3344:( 3273:( 3187:( 3114:( 3032:( 2997:( 2962:( 2936:( 2913:) 2909:( 2886:( 2785:( 2701:( 2662:( 2623:( 2593:( 2532:( 2508:( 2437:( 2402:( 2364:( 2337:( 2309:( 2287:( 2268:( 2253:( 2229:✉ 2226:( 2195:( 2173:( 2155:✉ 2152:( 2088:( 2061:( 2015:( 1961:( 1946:( 1867:( 1832:( 1805:( 1735:( 1704:( 1677:( 1669:" 1653:( 1628:✉ 1625:( 1596:✉ 1593:( 1531:( 1489:( 1463:( 1439:( 1389:( 1355:( 1328:( 1302:( 1283:( 1236:( 1165:( 1098:( 1031:( 968:( 914:( 899:( 852:( 802:( 764:( 729:( 656:( 630:( 608:( 590:( 566:. 476:( 444:( 393:( 366:( 339:( 320:( 304:( 285:( 279:— 231:( 175:O 169:n 167:a 158:. 149:. 71:( 52:( 33:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index