31:
735:. In further discussions on the article's talk page IZAK further explained what this meant and I posted a welcome message on the user's talk page. Further, I didn't realize you were at all associated with this article to begin with. I don't see you in the edit history or on the talk page. I am right to assume you randomly came across this article and thus commented on what you thought was my assumed misunderstanding on WP:COI?
648:. Some want it so bad, not to mention name's. However, what I came to realize, and hopefully the unsuccessful candidates will too, is that I, as a lowly editor, actually have more options than you, who are part of the establishment. Power to the masses :-). And if I get cared away from time to time, hey, I’m just an editor. Take care and just remember, at the 1,001 cut it doesn’t hurt anymore :-).
872:
At the core of the debate is whether or not a deleted page can be userfied and if G4 applies to it. The peripheral issue is whether or not processes have been followed in past iterations of similar pages and articles. It's a complicated mess. Personally, I don't care so much about the history, only
861:
So, Avi, After thanking you for your help with the history revision removal, I got around to checking out who you were (user page, talk page), as I often will do when I am in a discussion with another user and/or am bored out of my mind. I read your userpage and beliefs and noticed that you were a
808:
I have now answered the questions and the RfA is ready to be transcluded, however PeaceNT also wanted to nominate me. I'm so appreciative of all the support I'm being given and so I feel like it wouldn't be gracious of me if I didn't wait to see what PeaceNT says. How shall I proceed?
727:
Avraham, I received your note, tho I will say I am confused that I received it in the first place. You seem to be under the impression that I believe it is inappropriate for someone closely associated with an organization to edit it. This is not correct. I wrote on the talk page of
832:
Hi, Avraham! My name is Victor. I am very fascinated
Knowledge (XXG) user and I hope that my knowledge will be useful here. I take a keen interest in real estate and mortgage and now I'm working at the article
865:
After posting there from what limited knowledge I have (good luck, BTW, you seem to have a lot of support), I thought to myself, "Hey self, I wonder what Avi would think about your other little issue."
387:. In a nutshell, there usually is no problem edititing clear-cut items, and if there is anything that may possibly be somewhat controversial, make a note of it on the article's talk page. Thanks! --
873:
about the right - per policy - to have a userspace page that is either userfied from deletion or userfied in preparation for article-spacing. More rationale, such as intents and whatnot are therein.
934:
Ed O'Loughlin continues to make headlines in
Australia. The editorial of the last Australian Jewish News was devoted to him, as was a column that he wrote in the paper in his own defence.
449:, over a minor food article, yet, unbelievable. There are comments there that should be deleted on sight as well. Please check out that page and the violating editors. Thank you,
869:
838:
537:
Hi Avi: Thank you for giving this matter your serious attention. I wanted to let you know that I have now endorsed the latest "Proposed intermediate verdict 3.1" at
941:
606:
354:
I just noticed that you created a biographical entry for me on
Knowledge (XXG). Would it be inappropriate for me to edit my own biographical entry?
538:
491:
487:
786:. I believe that I'll be unavailable when it actually goes live, but if does decide to accept, either you or SW can add it. Hope this helps.
901:
402:
Ok, thanks. I made some small factual corrections, and provided some links for future edits by others on the "talk" page for the article.
937:
Despite what your co-editors might have thought about inclusion of O'Loughlin on the basis of noteriety, I've no doubts they are wrong.
364:
768:
If SW approves, would you be willing to accept me as a co-nominator? I've given the reasons for wanting to over at her's. :) Regards,
483:
967:
942:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/biztech/bwiki-woesb-founder-accused-of-rort-to-fund-massages-and-wine/2008/03/05/1204402516874.html
910:
379:
Hello, Dr. Adler. The best option would be for you to register an account as yourself, and then follow the procedures listed on
792:
774:
591:
I fear that too many bad Python references will expand the discussion beyond the bounds of acceptable RfA behavior... --
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
77:
63:
876:
Like I said, if you happen to have the time and inclination, I'd be interested in what you think about the whole mess.
846:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
568:
Aha. Thanks. I was thinking more of one for the Talk page itself, but that definitely looks in the right territory.
38:
384:
380:
573:
892:
834:
815:
760:
729:
515:
Understanding that
Knowledge (XXG)'s approach of getting input from anybody may or may not be a "wise" course
368:
955:
360:
842:
522:
477:
469:
837:. Some days ago it was nominaded for deletion. So I extremely need your detached opinion about it here -
783:
940:
It is something of a pity that with all the excellent values of
Knowledge (XXG) it is at heart rotten.
740:
963:
596:
569:
883:
810:
755:
677:
651:
618:
787:
769:
736:
683:
657:
624:
446:
710:
559:
518:
473:
407:
392:
51:
17:
442:
959:
674:: Ask for more money if the B-thing comes through. You are underpaid to begin with :-).
592:
644:- I’m sorry I laugh so much, but I just get a kick out of the drama that does go on at
546:
499:
454:
868:
So I was wondering, if you have the time and inclination, if you'd care to check out
839:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Log/2008_March_1#Fizber_.28internet_company.29
971:
850:
817:
795:
777:
762:
744:
714:
706:
690:
664:
631:
600:
577:
550:
526:
503:
458:
438:
434:
411:
403:
396:
388:
372:
334:-
43:
385:
Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography#If
Knowledge (XXG) already has an article about you
430:
426:
422:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
542:
539:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/IZAK2#Proposed intermediate verdict 3.1
495:
450:
492:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/IZAK2#Proposed intermediate verdict 2
488:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/IZAK2#Proposed intermediate verdict 3
702:
615:- all I can say is, I hope that finger was not pointed at me :-).
25:
433:
where some users are deploying the worst kind of blatant
732:
705:
I get triple what I do here.....hey, wait a minute! --
733:
you can feel free to make neutral edits to the article
417:
Urgent admin intervention needed at the Hummus article
470:
User talk:Shirahadasha#I have agreed to your proposal
494:). What are your thoughts on the matter? Thanks.
8:
427:Talk:Hummus#Hebrew/jewish/Israeli references
468:Hi Avraham. Thanks for your attention. See
754:Thank-you for such lovely comments :).
421:Hi Avi: My attention was drawn to the
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
486:)'s agreeing to Shira's proposal at
856:If you have a moment and an opinion
782:I'll write up the nomination in my
24:
29:
841:. Thank you in advance. :) --
1:
946:Oh well, win some lose some.
862:candidate for bureaucratship.
551:16:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
527:19:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
504:16:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
459:11:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
412:05:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
397:04:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
381:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography
373:04:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
94:
701:You don't say! At least at
464:Agreement with Shirahadasha
988:
930:Hello again from down here
972:10:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
851:23:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
835:Fizber (internet company)
818:21:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
796:19:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
778:19:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
763:17:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
745:03:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
715:17:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
691:04:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
665:04:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
632:03:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
601:03:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
578:06:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
42:of past discussions with
441:vitriol in violation of
347:Editing my own biography
89:
76:
69:
62:
920:06:19 (UTC) 5 Mar '08
533:Endorsing new proposal
828:I need your opinion !
607:That I Can Appreciate
490:(and I still hold by
472:where I notify User
870:this ANI discussion
730:Jacobadlerarkansas
974:
958:comment added by
922:
843:Prokopenya Viktor
689:
663:
630:
375:
363:comment added by
341:
340:
85:
84:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
18:User talk:Avraham
979:
953:
917:
908:
899:
890:
877:
813:
790:
772:
758:
688:
686:
675:
662:
660:
649:
629:
627:
616:
564:
558:
358:
337:
87:
86:
80:
79:Archive 21 : -->
74:
66:
60:
59:
33:
32:
26:
987:
986:
982:
981:
980:
978:
977:
976:
932:
911:
902:
893:
887:VigilancePrime
884:
858:
830:
811:
788:
770:
756:
752:
725:
684:
676:
658:
650:
625:
617:
610:
589:
570:Gordonofcartoon
566:
562:
556:
535:
466:
431:Talk:Hummus#RfC
419:
383:, specifically
349:
336:... (up to 100)
335:
78:
70:
65:< Archive 19
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
985:
983:
949:Kind regards,
931:
928:
926:
924:
923:
874:
866:
863:
857:
854:
829:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
801:
800:
799:
798:
751:
748:
724:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
609:
604:
588:
581:
565:
554:
534:
531:
530:
529:
513:was covered: "
511:Azaihu chacham
465:
462:
418:
415:
400:
399:
348:
345:
343:
339:
338:
93:
83:
82:
75:
68:
56:
55:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
984:
975:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
950:
947:
944:
943:
938:
935:
929:
927:
921:
918:
916:
915:
909:
907:
906:
900:
898:
897:
891:
889:
888:
882:
881:
875:
871:
867:
864:
860:
859:
855:
853:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
827:
819:
816:
814:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
797:
794:
791:
785:
781:
780:
779:
776:
773:
767:
766:
765:
764:
761:
759:
749:
747:
746:
742:
738:
734:
731:
722:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
692:
687:
681:
680:
673:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
661:
655:
654:
647:
643:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
628:
622:
621:
614:
608:
605:
603:
602:
598:
594:
586:
582:
580:
579:
575:
571:
561:
555:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
479:
475:
471:
463:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
374:
370:
366:
365:66.214.243.45
362:
355:
352:
346:
344:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
81:
73:
67:
61:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
951:
948:
945:
939:
936:
933:
925:
919:
913:
912:
904:
903:
895:
894:
886:
885:
879:
878:
831:
753:
726:
678:
671:
652:
645:
641:
619:
612:
611:
590:
584:
567:
536:
519:Shirahadasha
514:
510:
480:
474:Shirahadasha
467:
439:Anti-Zionist
420:
401:
357:Mark Adler
356:
353:
350:
342:
171:
90:
71:
47:
37:
954:—Preceding
583:Three...no
435:antisemitic
423:Talk:Hummus
359:—Preceding
36:This is an
960:Adon Emett
593:Kakofonous
541:. Thanks,
425:page, see
91:All Pages:
72:Archive 20
812:Seraphim♥
757:Seraphim♥
750:Adminship
587:counts...
351:Avraham,
968:contribs
956:unsigned
679:Shoessss
653:Shoessss
620:Shoessss
560:Uw-chat1
484:contribs
447:WP:CIVIL
361:unsigned
784:sandbox
517:..." --
443:WP:HATE
404:Dradler
44:Avraham
39:archive
952:Adon
789:Rudget
771:Rudget
737:Bstone
723:WP:COI
703:m:OTRS
685:Chat
659:Chat
646:Rfa’s
626:Chat
509:FYI,
16:<
964:talk
847:talk
741:talk
711:talk
597:talk
585:four
574:talk
547:talk
543:IZAK
523:talk
500:talk
496:IZAK
478:talk
455:talk
451:IZAK
445:and
437:and
429:and
408:talk
393:talk
369:talk
330:-
326:-
322:-
318:-
314:-
310:-
306:-
302:-
298:-
294:-
290:-
286:-
282:-
278:-
274:-
270:-
266:-
262:-
258:-
254:-
250:-
246:-
242:-
238:-
234:-
230:-
226:-
222:-
218:-
214:-
210:-
206:-
202:-
198:-
194:-
190:-
186:-
182:-
178:-
174:-
170:-
166:-
162:-
158:-
154:-
150:-
146:-
142:-
138:-
134:-
130:-
126:-
122:-
118:-
114:-
110:-
106:-
102:-
98:-
707:Avi
642:LOL
613:LOL
389:Avi
970:)
966:•
914:•
905:•
896:•
880:•
849:)
743:)
713:)
682:|
672:PS
656:|
623:|
599:)
576:)
563:}}
557:{{
549:)
525:)
502:)
457:)
410:)
395:)
371:)
332:60
328:59
324:58
320:57
316:56
312:55
308:54
304:53
300:52
296:51
292:50
288:49
284:48
280:47
276:46
272:45
268:44
264:43
260:42
256:41
252:40
248:39
244:38
240:37
236:36
232:35
228:34
224:33
220:32
216:31
212:30
208:29
204:28
200:27
196:26
192:25
188:24
184:23
180:22
176:21
172:20
168:19
164:18
160:17
156:16
152:15
148:14
144:13
140:12
136:11
132:10
46:.
962:(
845:(
793:.
775:.
739:(
709:(
595:(
572:(
545:(
521:(
498:(
481:·
476:(
453:(
406:(
391:(
367:(
128:9
124:8
120:7
116:6
112:5
108:4
104:3
100:2
96:1
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.