171:
website will be very helpful!) As I said to that editor, as a new article it would then go through the revision process that all new articles go through, so will again be assessed to see if there are enough independent, reliable sources to indicate notability in
Knowledge's terms. If you have any other articles written about you or your work by people you're not connected to, that would be useful too. I don't know when I'll be able to do this - people keep nominating articles about notable people/subjects for deletion, and the main way to argue against that is to find and add sources! and I am trying to write some new articles too. However, at least the articles aren't completely lost. (Unfortunately, as you've probably noticed, the article on
48:
170:
Hi, just to let you know that the editor you approached has "userfied" the articles on you and on Noble Ape, under my name - so I have them, with their history and sources. I will try to create one new article, using the sources I had found (having access to their full content that you saved on your
148:
Probably unknown to you through this process is that a number of the external references to Noble Ape are currently being suppressed through payment to Google and other search sources by a comedian who aggressively promoted a comedy tour and album under the same name from 2016 to the present. This
102:
I am writing to ask for a review and reversal of the deletion of the wikipedia entry about me and my project, Noble Ape. The entries deleted were created by a series of listeners to my podcasts from 2007 through to about 2013. To be clear, I am only interested in the reversal for Noble Ape and Tom
21:
Hi! It just so happens that I tried to bring about a deletion review for Kersal
Massive at the same time as you! Anyway, one of the reasons that the original was deleted was that it had been somewhat vandalised, and people couldn't tell the vandalism from the actual content (hence some people
152:
I continue to work on Noble Ape to this day totaling more than ten hours per week on average. This is a voluntary effort to further ideas in social evolution, philosophy and open source software. I appreciate that working on
Knowledge is also a voluntary effort. I thank you for your time and
106:
While I appreciate the articles that were deleted were not ideal, the articles Tom
Barbalet and Noble Ape did represent my work in a form which was comparable to others who have contributed a similar extent to the field of artificial life and still actively represented on Knowledge -
74:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
274:
I'm interested in your thoughts on creating one combined article versus maintaining the two previous articles. Would it be that Tom
Barbalet would point to Noble Ape? Anyway, all when you have time. Thanks once again.
78:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
26:. As you were the one who created the original DR, you may want to see/edit the draft - the best way to get a deletion reversed is generally to create a good enough to have it moved into the mainspace.
71:
60:
134:) that my work is not a walled garden. It has contributed to a number of different areas and been used by Apple and Intel for their development.
198:
for passing the articles to you. If you need any additional information please don't hesitate to contact me. I really appreciate this effort.
253:
261:
172:
138:
23:
64:
180:
27:
254:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051112214331/www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/thematerialworld_20030327.shtml
262:
https://shrinkrapradio.com/126-shrink-rap-radio-live-3-artificial-life-and-artificial-intelligence/
195:
112:
55:
39:
214:
191:
176:
142:
141:
also shows I have also fostered a community of developers and dialogue in the field of
86:
276:
199:
156:
248:
224:
240:
266:
124:
80:
256:
22:
deleting it for being nonsense), so I've created a new, sourced, draft at
108:
232:
131:
103:
Barbalet on
Knowledge. The other two articles are less important to me.
284:
207:
184:
164:
92:
32:
149:
has lowered any chance of finding external references to Noble Ape.
130:
They also show through
Knowledge and external academic references (
120:
116:
194:- thank you so much for all your efforts here. Thanks also to
175:
has just been deleted, so it's not there to refer to either!)
271:
I'm not sure if these are useful sources for your rewrite.
221:
53:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
59:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
217:
Most of the articles you referenced are found here:
229:The articles here are competitive peer reviewed:
153:considering my request to appeal this deletion.
249:https://twit.tv/shows/floss-weekly/episodes/31
245:There are also independent audio interviews:
8:
72:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Tom Barbalet
225:http://www.flipcode.com/interviews/nervana/
241:http://nobleape.com/sim/shark_optimize.pdf
267:https://geekspeak.org/episodes/2018/11/06
257:http://www.longfunk.com/data/na_bbc4.mp3
237:This is the Apple referenced article:
233:http://www.nobleape.com/sim/#Academic
132:http://www.nobleape.com/sim/#Academic
7:
61:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
98:Articles_for_deletion/Tom_Barbalet
14:
70:The article will be discussed at
46:
1:
173:Artificial life organizations
139:Artificial life organizations
24:User:Smurrayinchester/Kersal2
33:01:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
300:
93:10:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
285:19:38, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
222:http://nobleape.com/int/
208:15:32, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
185:14:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
165:23:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
63:or whether it should be
137:As the article on
291:
50:
49:
30:
299:
298:
294:
293:
292:
290:
289:
288:
143:artificial life
100:
91:
51:
47:
44:
28:
19:
12:
11:
5:
297:
295:
219:
218:
211:
210:
188:
187:
99:
96:
85:
45:
43:
38:Nomination of
36:
18:
17:Kersal Massive
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
296:
287:
286:
282:
278:
272:
269:
268:
264:
263:
259:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
243:
242:
238:
235:
234:
230:
227:
226:
223:
216:
213:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:Jo-Jo Eumerus
193:
190:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
144:
140:
135:
133:
128:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
104:
97:
95:
94:
90:
89:
84:
83:
76:
73:
68:
66:
62:
58:
57:
41:
37:
35:
34:
31:
25:
16:
280:
273:
270:
265:
260:
252:
247:
244:
239:
236:
231:
228:
220:
215:RebeccaGreen
203:
192:RebeccaGreen
177:RebeccaGreen
160:
155:
151:
147:
136:
129:
105:
101:
87:
81:
77:
69:
54:
52:
42:for deletion
20:
113:Critterding
125:Polyworld
56:ApeScript
40:ApeScript
277:Barbalet
200:Barbalet
157:Barbalet
109:OpenWorm
65:deleted
121:Boids
117:Avida
29:Laïka
281:talk
204:talk
181:talk
161:talk
82:Reyk
88:YO!
283:)
206:)
183:)
163:)
145:.
127:.
123:,
119:,
115:,
111:,
67:.
279:(
202:(
179:(
159:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.