User talk:Beetstra/Archive 5

2446:

extract relevant passages and put into your own words. It takes little effort to add a link. You say "external links do not enrich the encyclopedia, content does". As a user of said "encyclopedia", I can tell you for a fact that external links other than mine do indeed enrich the encyclopedia. To read someone's take on what someone else says is never as useful as hearing it from the horse's mouth in context. I've been around reporting long enough to have witnessed firsthand quotes used out of context by unsxcrupulous or incompetent reporters. So I'm not insisting anything, Dirk. I just think it's a misguided policy. All the more so if all the editors aren't on the same page and it's inconsistent. I don't get your police analogy at all. Speeding through a city would be analogous to "real" spam (that everyone -- not just the editors of Knowledge (XXG)) constitutes as spam: dangerous, pernicious, unhelpful to all. My example of proceeding through a red light in the middle of the night with no traffic around is analogous to "spam" as you see it, which is benign, even helpful. Examples of my links and others in your talk session here. Maybe it's a language thing. Maybe it's different in Dutch, I don't know. Oh, and I tried to discuss my issue in the talkpages but haven't heard back. Or maybe I did it wrong.

1797:

basically because i don't have the time, dirk. i run a full-time online music magazine over here where i do all the editing, photo editing, and html coding, plus i'm a single mom...just not enough hours in the day, my friend. would you suggest posting the links in the talk section of each page and making them available for others to use as reference material??? that could possibly be a solution if i one day find time for it. some of these interviews that my writers do are really quite good and very informative, as is evidenced by the fact that some have already been cited as references on some of your pages already ...in any case, since my time is very limited, this will likely be a project for another day, entirely. i regret that i can't spend hours upon hours dithering here over your content and style concepts as they are interpreted by each new online editor such as yourself (not to insult you, just saying each person's perception is different) and since all here is carved in sand and not stone, i must bow out of the wikipedia community until such a day when i have the time to properly devote to it.

1407:) is because I noticed that some of them have already been added, and not by me. I cover comedy for a living in Vancouver, Canada, and I believe these transcripted interviews are extremely valuable to any serious fan of comedy. So I was in the process of adding links to the individual pages when I noticed that they were being taken down almost as fast as I was putting them up. And many of these pages have other interviews linked. I'll put my interviews up against anybody's for shere information and entertainment value. Many of the other linked interviews are quite lightweight and superficial, yet they remain. Curious. Could you please elucidate? Thanks again, Guy MacPherson 2207:

copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons." my site seems to be OK (amount of detail) for a link, but I have to ask others to do this. The Layla article cites a lot of personal websites as source, which are "no reliable source" according to WP's own attribution rules. No one cares. The two links at the bottom? One containing copyrighted lyrics (I have removed from my site), the other a mediocre review. No one cares. But a link to the musical background of the album is removed, because I submitted it myself.

1746:

availability to information and outside sources. i'm not doing it for promotion. (believe me, i'm already well-known as a journalist, as is my site.) i don't have a staff or assistants or interns or even children to help me with postings, so therefore, I do these things myself. In fact, I am the entire office staff of crushermagazine.com so tell me, do you not consider these links viable external information if they are interviews with and/or are relevant to the subject within the last two years? please advise. editatrix

2393:

Technically, yes, it's illegal. But the spirit of the law is to maintain traffic flow in order to avoid accidents. Or the Nazi soldier who claims he was just following orders. The spirit of the "no spam" rule is to avoid real and pernicious spam that does nothing to add to enriching anything but the pocketbooks of the senders. To simply look at the time it takes to add links and conclude it is therefore spam is simpleminded at best. So if I were to add one link per day or per week, that would be better? Gmacp

1891:

love seeing as many outside sources as possible when researching a subject. Links, so far as they're not spam in the conventional sense but rather worthwhile, are valuable to me and I appreciate coming on to Knowledge (XXG) and not only reading the original article, but accessing other sources. So my aim in adding links to my interviews was only as a help to others. I enjoy reading the other interviews linked on Knowledge (XXG) and thought mine might be of use, too, to someone. Guy

3226:

charts anymore. Everytime I play one of her songs, it is logged and she gets paid a royalty. This does more for her than any fansite. The like is non descript. It doesn't use any marketing jargon. It doesn't have explanation points. So, if you still think it's inappropiate then you need to go and take off every fansite under every artist (many of them make money by the way). Also, you might want to consider taking off that interview on her site.

3460: 31: 700: 667: 1551:

article; People will not only be able to read about his biography, but also to watch his teachings through the videos in the link. Moreover there is a link for see the page Magister Musicae in English. I would like to know if its possible that you put back my external links if I put the English url of Magister Musicae. Thank you for your attention. --

637: 609: 3230:

of that. I spread the word by bringing people to the station, play their music and promote them. Radio is a part of every musicians life. Have you looked at her website? She is selling stuff. She is pushing her alblum. I am too. So, tell me how is it inappropiate? Tell the truth, face the facts of life. Don't jump to conclusions so quickly.

2722:). I have stated in my edit summary on the pages the reason why I have removed the library homepage from a number of wikipedia pages. Links to specific information on the librarysite have not been deleted, though these should all get a remark that the information is not accessible for all browsers. I hope this clarifies. -- 3229:

I dedicate my time and money to creating a place where people can hear artists like her. Someone thought that she was worth the time and money to interview her. Others thought she was worth it to make a fansite. Many christian artists and record labels use the concept of "Street teams". I am part

2732:

Thank you very much for your reaction. I agree with you that it's very unfortunate that Safari and Opera are currently not supported as they do not support XSLT. The current choice of client side architecture, rather than server side, may make supporting these browsers unlikely at present, but ...The

2628:

You removed external links I added to the pages of Rembrandt and Plato. These links refer to The European Library - gateway to European national library resources. People can use this library gateway to search for more (digital and non-digital ) information on Rembrandt and Plato. I don't want to nag

2310:

Just for the record, The external links I added to filmmakers and actors are not spam. Moving pictures Magazine is interested in disccussing the work of these artists on a purely artistic bases, these interviews were conducted completely with a non-profit agenda. I do not understand why this desition

2240:

Please take care not to remove content from talkpages of other people when you edit. And there is no policy or guideline against you improving the pages by adding relevant content and relevant references, addition of only external links is mentioned in the policies and guidelines. Hope this helps.

1890:

You say instead of posting the interview, I should consider adding the relevant information to the article and citing the interview as a reference. All well and good for those with time. I write for a living and have a family and don't have time to write and edit articles for free. As a journalist, I

3191:

Like I said before, perhaps it is time to establish an official Knowledge (XXG) policy about linking recipes. Something along the lines - a link section "Recipes" is both allowed and recommended, but must contain a link to WikiBooks cookbook (if there exists a relevant recipe), optional link to DMOZ

2426:

used for external link spamming (and will be shown as such in the spam-feed, except if we decide to whitelist the account). And do you really believe that a police officer would say 'ah, you have a fancy car, do your 120 kilometers an hour in the city, the faster you are through it the less traffic

2251:

a) Sorry if I did, but I used the edit button of this topic. I don't know why the other content disappeared, it was not my intention. In my Textbox there was only the article. If there is another way of responding than using the edit button, I didn't find it. I apologize. I didn't find any other way

1664:

Are they useless? That's subjective, but one thing you have yet to respond to (either to me or others on your page) is how you reconcile removing the interviews when your very own guidelines for external links says interviews should be included. I'd like to hear your answer to this. And not just the

1353:

Hello Dirk, I just got a message saying you deleted a link I added to the Canadian comedian Jeremy Hotz. I'm wondering if this was in error. The link I added was an interview I conducted with Hotz. I found this on the Knowledge (XXG) instruction page about what to link: "Sites with other meaningful,

1303:

We have been suppressed at how many people are using PrinterSetup. The tool was developed with a client, and was released for the benefit of the systems administration community. Again we would like to reiterate that the Knowledge (XXG) page was not setup to gain higher search engine ranking, as you

1180:

Please understand that we simply did our best to write a unbiased article. Perhaps if it had been on farming soya beans, we would have included links to companies like monsanto. In this case the page was written from our experience and contained a link to our site for both information references and

3417:

applies, and these links should not be there at all). Moreover, having these links there does invite more links to be added (as seen yesterday with the spammer), many of the links do rely on advertising, and without the links the articles could also reach featured article status. Again, thank you

2521:

I saw your addition to the new-users helppage. I don't know if it is the right place, it is more a place for questions like 'how do I make a table', or 'how do I insert an external link' (not, 'am I allowed'). I will not be answering there, seen I do have a conflict of interest in that discussion

2460:

the same as a paper encyclopedia, the efforts are there to actually bring this onto CD/into print (for people without internet, or with slow internet), which would render the external links useless (and propably information that could have been incorporated is missing, because it relied on external

2028:

to upload the file to wikipedia. Then you can use the picture in the pages. I really believe that would make these wikipedia pages more attractive (a picture says more than a thousand words, they say), it would explain the the pages more (you can read the wikipage while looking at the picture, so

1402:

Hi again, Dirk, I got one message from you regarding an interview I linked to the Jeremy Hotz page. Since then, I've noticed that several other interview links I've added have been removed, while others haven't. This is confusing. The reason I am adding my interviews (which can be found en masse at

929:

Each one of the interviews I linked to provides a wealth of personal insight and information about the subject - often in the subject's own words. This is relevant, meaningful, original content that cannot simply be appropriated for the main document. (Some topics covered the demise of his previous

2255:

b) As long as the points mentioned above exist, I don't add content. The rules should apply to every article. External links should be banned completely if not used for a citation source. All articles should have all sources listed. Strictly. Otherwise WP will have endless discussions like this...

2072:

I don't get it: The link to the page with the (100% copyrighted) lyrics persists, the link to the really lame review (there are so many excellent reviews on the net) is still there, but the link to my guitar page with a lot of information and facts about the song, the album and the music behind is

1708:

Re link farm. Why yours, and not a number of other interviews. In other words, if we allow yours, we should allow many others as well. As such, we either make the choice of not being a linkfarm, and hence not including them, or we are biased towards one. The section about what should be linked

1063:

because nothing like it existed. We added the page to Knowledge (XXG) so that there would be non-biased information about the software available to the world. It would be great to have a complete list of System Administration tools on Knowledge (XXG) with notes and feed back about the benefits and

2997:

If the links are valid links, please consider using them as a reference and add content to the pages. It is difficult for us to see how the other links were added (I noticed this addition, but at an addition rate of 5.417 links per minute we can't clean all; and the other links may not have been

1745:

dirk.... okay... so, i'm very new to this wikipedia thing. as a journalist, wikipedia is my first source of information when i am researching a subject/band that i am interviewing... so, as a courtesy, i was returning the favor and posting links to articles on my site so others may have the same

1700:

says "There are four types of wikispam: advertisements masquerading as articles, wide-scale external link spamming, bandspam (tangential references instead of disambiguation which promote some entity) and "Wikipedian-on-Wikipedian" spamming or, "canvassing" (also known as "internal spamming" and

1629:

I received your follow up and I'm not spamming. I'm simply providing an External Link under the existing External Link header that provides more information regarding the work and background of Jimmy Palmiotti and another one for John Romita Sr. There are more than one external links for other

1050:

We will respect your wishes to not add the links to the software hosted for download on our site if you believe that such links are not appropriate. However, these links were added to the article because they were perceived to be relevant and useful for wikipedia readers. The link means that the

3225:

What you think is inappropiate I find to be very appropiate. I put that link on Jessie Daniels site because I play her songs. This station is non profit in the truest sense. It sells no products. It plays artists that are on the charts and ones I personally like. Jessie Daniels isn't on the

3119:

Why not remove just the offending link(s)? It seems that great many people come to food articles from Google and other search engines, where respective WP entry is usually first or at least in top 10 - and they are usually not looking for Knowledge (XXG) article, but for recipes. It is a common

2392:

I notice that a goodly number of questions here are answered the same way: "So sorry, it's spam. Them's the rules." It's like the cop who doesn't understand the "spirit of the law" when handing out a ticket to someone who ran a red light at 4 in the morning with no other traffic on the streets.

1668:

In another message to me, you wrote that it looked like the links were promotional. How can I respond to this other than to say that wasn't the intent; I just happened to have conducted the interviews. Since I noticed three of my interviews linked by someone else, should I infer that only third

1176:

There is still content on this page, that we submitted on the original page. It is great to see that page develop. However, we are concerned that editors feel we are adding links to get page ranking in search engines. I imagine there are better ways to do this, particularly as many editors have

2492:

What I meant with my speeding analogy, it is wrong, whatever car you have. There are only very few cases where a judge would be lenient to a case of speeding in a city (or driving through a red light, a good cop would not allow that, even when streets are totally empty; in the Netherlands the

2445:

I don't insist. Now it's just a matter of the policy and enforcement that boggles my mind. Yes, it's so much more difficult to add "content". I know because from each of these interviews I write stories that run in various newspapers here. I get paid for my efforts. It takes time to read, then

1796:

yes, well, i see your point with the gentleman above, as he was posting only his own articles...i was posting links to articles on my site which were not only conducted by myself, but also my freelance writers. why don't i include them in the body of the articles and cite them as references?

1550:

Hello Dirk, I´m new at the Knowledge (XXG) community but reading the wikipedia policies I don`t understand so good why you have removed all my external links sections from the pages I created. Magister Musicae host videos with master classes from the professor and it adds information to the

1184:

Our intention is not advertising. It is to setup freely available information with unbiased information. We believe that this is the job of being an editor on wikipedia. We thank you for your hard work making wikipedia what it is today. However, external links to websites should not be seen as

1075:. We would like to understand why this content is not appropriate, because if it is inappropriate we probably do not understanding the Knowledge (XXG) philosophy. Lucid would like to provide Knowledge (XXG) with useful content. Other open-source software tools are listed on wikipedia such as 2951:

Dirk, it seems you have removed some of my external links, namely for Catalina Ponor and Nutripathy. I'm afraid I can't see why these links were removed. They contribute valid information to the pages in question, and are just as legitimate as some of the other external links. For example, my

2206:

A link is the most important thing in the world wide web. If everyone links to WP and WP doesn't link back, we'll all end up here. According to "What should be linked", point 3. "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Knowledge (XXG) article due to

1660:

Knowledge (XXG) defines spam as "posting advertisements or useless posts on a forum". It's not simply the fact of doing several entries in one sitting. Obviously you have to be wary of anything that looks like it might be spam, but when faced with evidence to the contrary, you should see your

1576:

Hello Dirk, I'm sorry I don't understad you so good, in orther to this problem with my links I think it was solved you tell me the way for including this and I think I'm doing well. What is the problem now, I think the link are relevant for the articles. I'm sorry so much I don't want to

2510:

does give you another alternative: discuss the linkaddition on the talkpage of the page you want the link added to, and when consensus is reached, the link can be added. That does result in the link being in the external links sections, with consensus, and it not being added in a mass

2210:

Take a look at the "Layla and Other Assorted Love Songs" article. There is even no source cited in the whole article! Two external links - a fanzine and a personal review (without any name/contact information/disclaimer), not to the artists home page according to the WP's own rules.

1724:

from top to bottom: "If the site or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source first. Refer to the citation guideline for instructions on citing sources. This guideline refers to external links other than

1181:

as a provider of information storage solutions. The link is not for our benefit, but rather for Knowledge (XXG) readers who would like more information about either our services, or some of the general white papers which have general information on information storage technology.

1058:

The article was originally written to provide information on setting up printers. With the hope that there would be feed back on the product, and alternative products along with methods for setting up printers to be added to the page by wikipedia editors. We originally developed

3124:) should be there, in my opinion. In case of BBC, they usually have also a very good review of the "foodstuff" in question. That said, I am not going to put the links back there - but perhaps you should consider reinstating some of the "good" links (to noncommercial sites - see 253:

this page for some time after adding a question). Otherwise I will clearly state where the discussion will be moved/copied to. Though, with the large number of pages I am watching, it may be wise to contact me here as well if you need a swift response. If I forget to answer,

2887:

It seems to me that rather than Wiki being informative and useful to people on the subject of the Whitsunday Islands the moderator for those pages is blindly denying Wiki users the very information they are interested in when looking up the subject of the Whitsunday Islands.

2868:

Yes, I indeed was quite shocked to see the sheer size of that category. I hope it helps. I think the categories need some adidtional inheritence of categories, they should also be subcats of the MCB-project-cats, you know anything about that? Hope to see you around!

2023:

I think you could have look at the pictures on the picture-sites (imageshack, cemzoo.com, webcindario.com and the company), if they have proper copyright info, and you are allowed to use them according to that, you download the picture from the site, and use wikipedia's

1485: 1925:

I do understand your point, but the thing you are now wanting is not something that has to do with me removing your external links, but something that would need a change of wikipedia policy. Until then, see these pillars, policies, and guidelines. Thank you.

2214:

I understand that WP has to fight against spamming and misuse. No question. But an article about Layla in the world wide web should contain a link to a prominent site with more details about the music itself. Otherwise WP should in general disallow any external

3173:

I generally don't like the idea of linking DMOZ pages to articles - other then 1st time checking, DMOZ links are rarely verified. As fluctuating as the net is, there can be lots of spam/ad links from dead sites in DMOZ - or just plain link farming, even that

1089:

Perhaps the idea for the page made sense but you found the content provided was not appropriate? If this is the case, would you please provide some tips on how to improve the page. Or simply make the appropriate modifications. Rather than deleting the page.

2680:

accessible with Internet Explorer (6.0+), Firefox or Mozilla/Netscape (on windows, other operating systems have even lower access). In other words, all the users that do not have availability over these browsers would not be able to read the contents (see

3366:

The editing guidelines don't allow recipes inside of articles. It is generally accepted they are allowed in links. At least, that's how I see it. Please point to the specific guideline banning links to recipes or I'm going to revert your unhelpful edits.

2891:

In addition to that I noted when first coming to Wiki numerous private tourism businesses listed, obviously as you are the moderator for this section you allowed those links to stay...yet you delete other links giving information that people can compare.

1316:

is not large notable enough, or that it was deleted because the page was started by the institute who developed the project. In either case, we have decided to never re-build this Knowledge (XXG) page. Instead we will wait for someone else to build this

2668:

The links are not specific to information on Rembrandt, Plato, but were to the homepage of the organisation. If we would allow that, then every library that has a book on Rembrandt or Plato could put their link in the external links section (per

2952:

addition to Nutripathy was my page on the alkaline diet, which provides detailed information on the subject; much more detailed information than is currently on the page, plus further links with more info. Why is this not a legitimate link?

1810:

So, what you basically say, is that we should allow you to spam your links to 20 articles in 1 hour and 45 minutes (I presume the 21st link was in another session), because you don't have time to actually contribute actual content to one

2202:

Now that I've read about external links, copyrights, attribution and linking to myself, articles with URL's that are not linked (so you have to copy and paste), there's on one question left: how do I delete my Knowledge (XXG) account?

2374:

of 5.34, seems like a proper synthesis. The question now is, the wikipedia article says highest oxidation state 4 .. this is oxidation state 2. So I guess we do have krypton compounds, but now for the highest oxidation state.

1656:

Hi again, Dirk, In your response to me, you wrote that you also have noticed other interviews "but that does not mean a) that others should be added, especially not en mass, and b) maybe the other links should also be removed".

3436:

OK, I should have been a bit more clear. The one link that got spammed wás mexicanfood.about.com. Upon that I encountered many linkfarms, and I have cleaned a number of them. And I think I explained why these links violate

565:

ed. Removing importance-tags does not take away the backlog, it only hides from attention, deleting pages does not make the database smaller. If you contest the notability/importance of an article, please consider adding an

1172:

article to wikipedia, it grew to be a list of storage service providers with links to websites and today, it is turning into an informative page for people interested in this topic thanks to the help of people like you.

502:

I am in general against deletion, except when the page really gives misinformation, is clear spam or copyvio. Otherwise, these pages may need to be expanded or rewritten. For very short articles there are the different

3086:

I have done some edits to the first section, where I think the links are appropriate (there may be more possible, but don't overdo it, one link per section to a certain page is enough, but do link the key-words; on IRC

925:

The four interviews (from four different sources) I linked to fit within this guideline: "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews."

1054:

PrinterSetup is not for sale. PrinterSetup is free. PrinterSetup is open-source (GNU GPL v2) software and is useful for systems administrators and people who are interested in automatic print queue creation software.

1046:

was deleted. If you feel that this is advertising that is fine. However, the page was setup with the intention of providing informative information for systems administrators rather than commercial advertising.

3205:

I hope you don't mind if I post my reply only here. Some Wikipedians like to get always a reply on their talk page as well, but I like to keep conversations in one place (edit: copied to your page as well now).

2073:

removed immediately. Why? It's not spam, contained a lot of the Knowledge (XXG) information even before Knowledge (XXG) was born, and was once a credited source... same with my other removed links (Beano etc.).

2685:, links to avoid, #7). I am using Opera, and after accessing the site the only way to get back to wikipedia was by closing the window and opening a fresh one to go to wikipedia (the back-button did not work). 2505:

that external links should be considered to be used as a reference first. In all cases, if your link is adding information, and you believe that your link should be in the external links section on a page,

3120:

practice to have few recipe links in food articles. Of course, link farming is a totally different issue and such links should always be removed - but good links to food sites (esp. ad-free sites, such as

2758:

I am sure, that when the technological problems are out of the way, the material on the site will serve as very good online (and hence, accessible) reference material. May I, for a next time, ask you to

2600:(Answer in English)I am not sure what you mean. If you think certain things are disputed, I guess the best thing to do is create a section in the talk where you summarise the disputed points and add a 1298:

Please understand there were never any intentions to use Knowledge (XXG) to generate interest in PrinterSetup. The external links were appropriately placed to the official site of the software tool.

328:). This may mean that I remove links, while similar links are already there or which are there already for a long time. Still, the question is not whether your link should be there, the question 146: 1387:. If you think the links do add valuable information to the article, please request addition on the talkpage, or add contents to the article and use the interviews as a reference. Thank you. -- 3152:, but it seems they failed to reach consensus. Some kind of general policy about recipes is definitely needed - as for the WP:EL, I think recipe links are covered by #2, #3 and especially #4 in 3063:

for how to make wikilinks). The other article has some more links to other wikipedia articles, but could use some more as well. 'Inline' external links should preferably be references. See

1354:

relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews." Since it's an interview (and one I conducted myself), shouldn't it be put back up? Thanks, Guy

2673:- wikipedia is not a list of external links). Moreover, one could then also consider to add a link to all search engines, which can also be used to find more information on Rembrandt or Plato. 186:. If you feel that your name is wrongly on the COI reports list because of an unfortunate overlap between your username and a certain link or text, please ask for whitelisting by starting a 2046:

Oh, you could have a look at the wikipedia pages about sonic, they have pictures, if you click the picture you might see how they got hold of the pictures, and you could do the same. --

3441:, the recipes can be incorporated in wikibooks, and hence, they do not need to be in external links sections. Off course it becomes another issue if they were used as a reference. -- 2422:? External links do not enrich the encyclopedia, content does. Whether you only spam once a week, or spam 20 times in 30 minutes does of course not make a difference, the account is 1265:

Please understand that wikipedia is not a linkfarm, it is not the yellow pages, and it is not a vehicle for promotion of products. We are writing an encyclopedia here. Thank you. --

2806:

Well, look at any wikipage to find a link by these huge organisations! You can't say no to one, and ok to the other! Certainly not when it concerns a cultural (public!) institution.

2839:, and I may say no to the others as well, depending on how they are added, and how they are used. Please give me the url's or the pages that the other links are added to, then 1961:

Hi, thanks for the compliments. Re the reaction. I am afraid I have no clue. I guess you would have to consult some literature for that. Sorry. Hope to see you around. --

1168:

wikipedia page. In fact those links were to competitors in this market. We added them to the page to make the page as unbiassed as possible. We believe that since we added the

2497:

should not bend because a link is not promotional (which in a way I still would contest, you are involved in the target of the link). Many, many links are questionable under

576:

tag, or raise the subject on an appropriate wikiproject. Remember, there are many, many pages on the wikipedia, many need attention, so maybe we have to live with a backlog.

193:. For a better answer please include some specific 'diffs' of your edits (you can copy the link from the report page). If you want a quicker response, make your case at 2884:

Sailing is THE mainstay industry in the Whitsunday Islands....yet you feel you should remove links that take people to what they want to see in the Whitsunday Islands.

2920:

Besides the question if these links are appropriate on the pages (are they symmetrical to the page, are they providing information, are they non-commercial, etc.; see

395:

If you have other questions, or still have questions on my view of the external link policy, disagree with me, or think I made a mistake in removing a link you added,

3413:

could replace this on many pages (which, now I think of it, actually is 'incoporating the data into wikipedia' (well, a sister-project), so now suddenly the whole of

1918:

So because you don't have time to add content to the wikipedia, we have to allow you to spam. I am sorry. As many outside sources as possible is not possible, per

1093:

If you have changed your mind and believe that the information regarding the setup and management of printer queue is appropriate, would you please re-establish the

3048:

Ah, this took some time to see. I saw your article specific because you were adding external links in the article; I am monitoring link additions when I have time.

1665:

fact that Knowledge (XXG) isn't a link farm, because that's not consistent with the guidelines which says interviews are not only fine, but "should" be included.

2147:

Thanks. I've signed in now. So if I add content, i.e. about the musical stucture, I can add the link to more on my site? It would be stupid to paste it all...

2895:

Do you think you are being fair? and more importantly by deleting the links to sailing boats you are denying information that most people are looking for.

3240: 2955: 2632: 2291:

Oops, I see you use an IP-number, that is not strictly an account. That makes the account deleting different, but still, I think you should ask at the

2076: 1894: 1847: 1672: 1412: 975: 1661:

mistake. Since my interviews have no (zero) advertising, and no one gets paid for any hit, it doesn't fall under the "posting advertisements" heading.

1239:

First, the article printersetup was written as an advertisement, not in a neutral way. The article might be appropriate when written according to the

272:

There are several discussions about my link removal here, and in my archives. If you want to contact me about my view of this policy, please read and

3385:. Moreover, one of the links got spammed heavily around wikipedia, whereupon these edits got reverted and I encountered large linkfarms of recipes. 2427:

there is in the city?' Come on. If you have problems with your link-addition being described as spam, please discuss your issues at the talkpages of

589:-template on sight. The template is in most cases superfluous, expansion is intrinsic to the wikipedia (for stubs, expansion is already mentioned in 1262:, I invite you to read the guidelines there. If you believe that the link is of value to the article, please discuss addition on the talkpage first. 228: 224: 220: 2279:

These points will keep on existing. The policies are, in my opinion quite clear, there are just not enough people to get things up to policy level.

216: 3157: 2172:

If you add relevant content, and you get that information from an interview, then a link to that interview (using the references as described in

1086:

is not able to be included as well. We like Knowledge (XXG) so much we are simply attempting to bring something back to the wikipedia community.

705: 3301:

What if I'll write an article about SEO tools for getting info. Like analitical article. And won't give privelegies to any one of this products?

2282:

You are welcome, and I wanted to thank you discussing this with me. Still I hope to see you around helping us making a better encyclopedia. --

1471:

You *just* beat me to reporting our anonymous link spamming friend to AIV (I had an edit conflict with you!). Good work and nice teamwork! --

2485:

guideline is misguided here, but I am very willing to discuss that, with others involved in the writing of these policies, at the talkpage of

2456:

There are some guidelines and policies which give some rules to improve the wikipedia. Although we are writing an online wikipedia, which is

2911: 1309:

Other than the external links (which we still believe were completely appropriate) are there any other reasons for the deletion of this page?

1103:

We look forward to supporting the Knowledge (XXG) project. However, we do not understand why linking to external websites is such a problem.

3101:

after the mission statement, it would be great if you could replace that with a reference to the mission-statement document on the IRC-site.

2481:), they are all pointing towards incorporating information, not to linking information. I am sorry, I am not going to discuss whether the 421:

I convert inline URL's into references and convert referencing styles to a consistent format. My preferred style is the style provided by

145: 2959: 2104:

not content (which is spamming under the wikipedia definition). If your site contains information, why not add content and use it as a

1213: 1131: 513:

marks, which clearly state that the article is to be expanded. For articles that do not state why they are notable, I will add either

457:-templates) I will assess whether referencing would benefit from the cite.php-style. Feel free to revert these edits when I am wrong. 3317: 2822: 2749: 2644: 2080: 1233: 2004:

By the way, although I could technically upload the images, I do not have the proper copyright info, which is a bit of a problem. --

1701:"cross-posting"). ", and I define this as 'wide scale external link spamming'. I don't see where I make a mistake when an editor is 3393:

clearly state, that external link sections should be kept to a minimum, and there are in this case two alternatives available, both

2796:. That may also be true for the other sites, but for that I need examples to see. I am sorry, you are redlisted at the moment. -- 1859: 1440:

the interviews. I also have noticed other interviews there, but that does not mean a) that others should be added, especially not

2273:

I am not sure if an account can be deleted, the MySQL database has edits linked to that account, so you would have to ask that at

3272:, when you test your link and yourself against these two guidelines you see that you are in violation of them. Please note that 3192:

and no more then five links to relevant recipes in ad-free/non-commercial sites? Some kind of template would be useful, probably.

484:

Note: I am working with some other developers on mediawiki to expand the possibilities of cite.php, our attempts can be followed

2350:

is often cited as an example of a krypton compound, I will see if I can find the original reference (and see if I believe it!).

3052: 2610:

tag (well, the Dutch version of that). The subject and the contents seem, at first glance, fine to me. Hope to hear more. --

2514:

These discussions are all over the talkpages of the people watching the link-addition feeds or page-change feeds and bots like

2270:

No worries. As you explain you did it correct, must have been a glitch, and everything is recorded anyway, so nothing is lost.

1762: 2558: 3252: 987: 2661:

You were adding the links to a number of pages (and you were only adding links). That is, under the wikipedia definition,

3526: 3039: 2231: 2163: 933:

In encourage you to independently review these interview links to see for yourself the quality and depth of the content.

883: 876: 869: 862: 855: 848: 841: 834: 827: 820: 813: 806: 799: 97: 3149: 674: 533:. In my view there is a distinct difference between these two templates, while articles carrying one of these templates 375: 3518: 3513: 3501: 3496: 3488: 792: 785: 778: 771: 757: 750: 743: 736: 545:

does not state that (yet). The latter provides a clear concern that the article is not notable, and should probably be

89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3178:

from you has a movie reviews, several links of "tortilla flour" and "Mexican cookware" providers/manufacturers/sellers.

2990:

Do I read your question right, you mean that Nutripathy is a page that you maintain? If that is the case, please read

2692:, the information can be incorporated, and it is better to use specific information as a reference (again under policy 2409: 1906: 1684: 1593: 1424: 1370: 1292:

It would be great if there was a unbiassed Wikipeida page with information regarding system administration utilities.

3016:

You have marked a page and requested edits to Wikify. I have made a number of edits and the page parallels that of

2493:

traffic cameras on certain crossroads do not turn off when it is dark). Certain rules don't bend, and I think that

2311:

was made when so links to other interviews at other sites were already listed in the external links of these pages.

3467: 2783:

That other people are spamming is not a reason for you to do the same, sorry. Could you give me some examples? --

904: 897: 890: 619: 608: 408: 38: 1980:

upload the images or get someone to do it. But if you don't like Bobobo, just stay away from the Bobobo articles.

1188:

Please let us know if it is still a problem to post links or references in articles which refer back to our site.

2907: 2590:! Daar moet snel wat aan gebeuren; weet jij hoe je een pagina aanmerkt als "wiki-onwaardig" of iets dergelijks ? 2571:

Great! Thanks! Hope this solves all my problems with converting the old file. I'll download soon! Cheers! --

1946: 1530: 3326:

Hello, thank you for your message. You could indeed try and write an article about that, as long as it is in a

153: 2363: 2241:

You don't have to remove your account, if you don't need it anymore you can just stop using it. Thank you. --

1941:

Hello, thanks for all your great work and contributions. I really enjoy your user page. I was wondering: could

1169: 1165: 1159: 404: 195: 2418:

Why do you insist to have your link in the external link section, is it really so much more difficult to add

249:

I will respond to talk messages where they started, trying to keep discussions in one place (you may want to

3104:

Thanks for your inquiry, and if you have further questions, please ask. Hope this helps, happy editing. --

2963: 2314: 1209: 1127: 930:

band, his life philosophies, how he has spent the last five years, and other similarly informative topics.)

570: 261:

I preserve the right not to answer to non-civil remarks, or subjects which are covered in this talk-header.

3335: 3305: 3027: 2899: 2810: 2737: 2397: 2219: 2151: 2057:

Stop touching the Bobobo articles! This is the second time now! Unless you're a reasonable fan, stay away!

1814:

I am not saying that the links could not be appropriate, they may be. But the way you were adding them is

1750: 1716:

Re extra information. If these interviews are indeed giving extra information, then why not use them as a

1581: 1358: 1244: 1243:, although I might still contest if it is notable enough to be mentioned in the wikipedia. Please see the 1201: 1119: 3313: 2903: 2818: 2745: 2640: 2084: 1227: 1012: 320:(understand that wikipedia defines spam as: '... wide-scale external link spamming ...', even if the link 2773:

Dear Dirk, What about the links that are created by OCLC/Worldcat (since today) and Project Gutenberg???

962: 936:

I also updated the "categories" section, again, within entirely appropriate (read: relevant) parameters.

1942: 1872: 1855: 1205: 1123: 3309: 1533:

is sometimes depressing, and this just makes my day! Thanks again! And I will keep an eye on him. --

1223: 1851: 1250:

Second, the majority of edits was the addition of an external link. You were, repeatedly, pointed to

332:

be whether those other links should be there (again, see the wording of the policies and guidelines).

2354: 2515: 1800: 1754: 1071:

article is inappropriate please let us know. Our contact information from available from our site :

400: 3244: 3125: 1758: 527: 517: 3031: 2840: 2501:

anyway (and some pages get cleaned drastically); I have already mentioned that it states early in

2432: 2223: 2155: 2121: 1631: 1513: 1449: 1313: 1283: 1094: 1083: 1068: 1060: 1043: 699: 3476: 3248: 2347: 1100:

Your consideration on this page is appreciated, by us and also many unix systems administrators.

983: 47: 17: 2447: 2401: 1898: 1676: 1585: 1552: 1416: 1362: 3128: 2998:

spammed). All this is not a reason to add more, the others may have to be cleaned as well. --

3407: 3338:

to assert whether the material you want to add is indeed notable enough. Hope this helps. --

3035: 2814: 2774: 2741: 2636: 2604: 2227: 2159: 1638: 969: 942: 717: 160: 3327: 3269: 3064: 2980: 2925: 2836: 2733:

European Library is working on it! Thanks again - I will certainly keep your remarks in mind!

2662: 2523: 2522:

now (I will also not be the first to answer to queries if you decide to post on talkpages of

2494: 2486: 2482: 2470: 2428: 2321: 2173: 2105: 2097: 1815: 1780: 1776: 1717: 1697: 1603: 1445: 1437: 1380: 1259: 422: 325: 317: 284: 201: 3237:

Above is the link if this makes any sense to you. Without Radio Most artists would starve.

1952: 1079: 679: 304:

Hence, I will remove external links on pages where I think they do not add to the page (per

212: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3348: 3280: 3273: 3080: 3060: 2991: 2984: 2929: 2832: 2793: 2760: 2700: 2693: 2670: 2462: 2457: 2329: 2192:

says something about linking to your 'own' articles. Hope this helps, and ... welcome! --

2185: 2134: 2030: 1988: 1919: 1823: 1784: 1607: 1453: 1251: 1240: 382:

the link would be appropriate for wikipedia). It may be wise to consider the alternatives

305: 276: 119: 2859: 2405: 2351: 1902: 1680: 1589: 1562: 1420: 1366: 922:

Thanks for the note. I, of course, respectfully disagree with your dismissal of my edits.

583: 3438: 3414: 3390: 3331: 3265: 3153: 3076: 3068: 2976: 2921: 2719: 2689: 2682: 2527: 2507: 2502: 2498: 2478: 2466: 2325: 2292: 2274: 2177: 2117: 2109: 2101: 2034: 1992: 1819: 1772: 1721: 1710: 1611: 1384: 1255: 475: 461: 309: 280: 3175: 2562: 2058: 2025: 2016: 1981: 1379:

Thank you for your question. You were adding links in a mass-way, which is considered

968:

Hi Dirk. Could you delete this article, since it should be Am(IV). I moved the page to

3072: 2474: 2189: 2181: 2113: 1484: 391:

Please consider if the link you want to add complies with the policies and guidelines.

374:

If the linkspam of a certain link perseveres, I will not hesitate to report it to the

288: 3442: 3428: 3419: 3397: 3368: 3352: 3339: 3284: 3105: 3088: 2999: 2937: 2870: 2844: 2797: 2784: 2764: 2723: 2712: 2611: 2572: 2543: 2534: 2436: 2376: 2333: 2296: 2283: 2242: 2193: 2138: 2125: 2047: 2038: 2005: 1996: 1962: 1927: 1876: 1830: 1788: 1731: 1642: 1615: 1566: 1534: 1457: 1388: 1266: 1141: 1029: 1019: 999: 979: 952: 549: 507: 451: 441: 354: 3445: 3431: 3422: 3371: 3355: 3342: 3287: 3256: 3210: 3134: 3108: 3002: 2967: 2940: 2873: 2862: 2847: 2800: 2787: 2777: 2767: 2726: 2648: 2614: 2594: 2591: 2575: 2565: 2546: 2537: 2450: 2439: 2379: 2357: 2336: 2299: 2286: 2245: 2196: 2141: 2128: 2088: 2050: 2041: 2008: 1999: 1965: 1955: 1930: 1910: 1879: 1863: 1833: 1803: 1791: 1734: 1688: 1645: 1618: 1569: 1555: 1537: 1520: 1517: 1503: 1500: 1475: 1472: 1460: 1428: 1391: 1269: 1144: 1032: 1022: 1002: 991: 955: 945: 559: 431: 1822:

clearly gives the alternatives that you could follow, especially since you have a

1775:, consider adding content to the articles and use the interviews on the site as a 2629:

and I am really sorry for asking, but why do you remove links to huge libraries?

1164:

We are not affiliated with the companies which we setup external links to on the

492:. If you like these features and want them enabled, please vote for these bugs. 407:

on your specific case. Also, regarding link, I can be contacted on IRC, channel

3475:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3095: 1408: 666: 468: 208: 183: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2928:(under the wikipedia definition) these links to the pages. Knowledge (XXG) is 2656:

I have answered you in a personal email. But I will also write my points here.

2587: 1322:

Again thank you for your editing of Knowledge (XXG). You are doing a great job.

3144:

Hmm... I suspect that this issue is actually wider then just recipe links on

1949:? Current routes use HgCl2 and methylamine. What do you think? Much obliged! 460:

Converting inline URLs in references may result in data being retrieved from

3130:, probably few others). In my opinion they are relevant, useful and needed. 1630:

interviews with Jimmy on other programs. Thanks for your feedback on this.

474:. If you feel that the page should be used as a reference (complying with 2858:

Good job. It shows a daunting amount of work needs to be done! Thank you.

3207: 3145: 3131: 3020:

in form (which is not Wikified). What are you seeing that I am missing?

2699:

Since I have seen your emailaddress and signature I have to point you to

2188:, I would take care not to write because you want to include your links, 1076: 366:

Add the link to other mediawiki projects aimed at advertiseing (see e.g.

1404: 636: 2553:

AWB Bug: Strange conversion of newline in advanced find/replace - Fixed

1444:, and b) maybe the other links should also be removed, or converted to 489: 427:). When other mechanisms are mainly (but not consistently) used (e.g. 399:. If you absolutely want an answer, you can try to poke the people at 3121: 2461:

links). Hence the policies and guidelines in question here (parts of

1945:

Ti{OCH(CH3)2}4 be used to add amine groups in reductive animation of

649: 485: 300:

External links are not meant to tunnel people away from the wikipedia.

464:. In these cases, the link may have been removed, and replaced by a 343:

to the article, and use the link as a reference (content is not 'see

3279:

Seen your username and what you are linking, I also have to ask you

1106:

Looking forward to some feedback or seeing the page reestablished.

3427:

Please justify why mexicanfood.about.com violates the guidelines.

3091:

has to be a link, just as the link to the university). I added a

1051:

reader will not be required to perform a search for the software.

1436:

As was said in my warning to you, and in my above post, you were

1312:

The only other foreseeable reasons for the page deletion is that

3056: 2708:

Some of the pages I now encountered should be cleaned anyway, a

2557:

Hi, Just a quick message to let you know, i've fixed the bug in

3454: 2665:(it does not matter whether or not the links are appropriate). 2320:

The link-addition is spam under the wikipedia definition, see

1195: 130:

The question you may have may already have been answered there

25: 2266:

d) Thanks for taking the time. This is not meant personal.

360:(you can consider to remove other links covered in the dmoz). 339:

If the link contains information, use the information to add

128:

in the header of this talkpage before starting a new subject.

2718:

would be good to replace a large number of links (see again

1286:

is doing. It simply makes print queues. It is free software.

363:

Incorporate the information into one of the sister projects.

335:

Please consider the alternatives before re-adding the link:

291:, and read the discussions on my talkpage or in my archives 3059:

links in the text) to other articles within wikipedia (see

2831:

I am not saying no to your site, I am saying no to the way

2124:

can do, maybe you could consider to join us, thank you. --

1097:

page, or provide the go-ahead for us to recreate the page.

1512:

I congratulated us too soon. He or she has registered as

1340: 1113: 1072: 1606:. Sorry. Please read the relevant policies/guidelines: 1177:

stated that follow for spiders is disabled on wikipedia.

478:!!), please discuss that on the talkpage of the page, or 367: 344: 397:

please poke me by starting a new subject on my talk-page

2763:

your posts? Thank you, and hope to see you around! --

2586:

Alarm! Moet je eens kijken op de nederlandse wiki over

1236:), though I see this IP has a similar addition pattern. 1008:

Sorry, I can't, you need an admin for that. I guess a

724:

days are automatically archived to the current archive

479: 396: 255: 250: 189: 166: 114: 3017: 2029:

you can describe it better), and it would not violate

3075:), and the external links section should be conform 2975:

The question is not only if it is a valid link (per

2561:. Should be in the 3.1.3.0 release due very soon =) 2530:

or the similar); I wanted others to give their view.

2116:). If you think the other sites do not comply with 1771:Similar to the answer above this one. Please read 1452:?). Knowledge (XXG) is, as I also mentioned above 1499:Awarded for helping us find and remove link spam. 939:Thank you, Dirk, for your time and consideration. 694: 598: 2880:You Removing Sailing links from Whitsundays Pages 2263:my account deleted. This must be possible. How? 1987:Thank you for your remark. I hope you have read 1185:advertising if they are in an objective context. 480:poke me by starting a new subject on my talk-page 113:Please leave me a note by starting a new subject 3351:(I don't know if that applies in this case)? -- 537:not be notable, the first template does say the 3264:In the warnings you were already asked to read 2983:links to multiple articles. Also, please read 1222:I assume you are referring to the additions by 3347:Oh, just to be sure, could you have a look at 2120:, please note that there is only so much that 2979:), you were, under the wikipedia definition, 2542:I see there are answers on the help-page. -- 2133:By the way, you might want to have a look at 8: 1844:I thought I was doing good. I have stopped. 1730:Hope this clarifies further. Thank you. -- 3330:-tone, preferably backed up by third-party 2370:. Credible source (peer reviewed, ACS), wR 2295:, I for sure cannot help you with that. -- 126:You may want to have a look at the subjects 3158:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Food and drink 2932:. You are of course free to add relevant 140: 3055:is plain text, not having wikilinks (the 3053:Industrial Refrigeration Consortium (IRC) 1482: 1042:It seems the Knowledge (XXG) article for 579:Having said this, I generally delete the 2037:, don't you think? Hope this helps! -- 951:Has been answered on talkpage of user -- 498:Stub/Importance/Notability/Expand/Expert 312:), or when they are added in a way that 2065:Link removal Layla (and other EC songs) 1779:. The way you were adding them now is 1741:most precious blood/theory of a deadman 972:, which is what everyone calls it. Ta. 3473:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1516:and may be continuing spamming. :( -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2987:(and other sections in that article). 2843:can decide on the others as well. -- 1705:adding external links and no content. 1529:Thanks for the Barnstar! Seeing the 1405:http://comedycouch.com/interviews.htm 1383:. Also the links do not comply with 7: 3160:seems to be dead or as good as dead. 2366:reports a crystal structure of α-KrX 1709:comes way after the introduction of 1669:parties can add external links? Guy 673:This user knows where IRC hides the 603: 541:is probably notable enough, but the 2015:From who? The site or the company? 1818:(under the wikipedia definition). 1713:, which describes the alternatives. 1325:All the best, from the Lucid team. 1191:All the best. From the Lucid team. 2924:), the fact remains that you were 2833:you (with a conflict of interest!) 1158:Regarding the wikipedia article : 1109:All the best from the Lucid Team. 24: 3377:Thank you for your assumption of 3148:. I did some searching and found 3051:What I meant is that the text in 720:. Timestamped threads older than 350:Add an appropriate linkfarm like 3458: 3298:Hi, I'm about Iseo_widget page. 3150:Knowledge (XXG):Recipes_proposal 2676:The site europeanlibrary.org is 2518:. Is that barnstar still there? 2328:. Moreover, you seem to have a 2176:) would be OK (I assume it is a 1483: 1282:I encourage you to look at what 698: 677:, and knows how to feed them to 665: 660: 635: 630: 607: 144: 29: 3418:and hope to see you around. -- 2252:to contact you (email, PM...). 238: 104: 3018:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ashrae 1067:If you still believe that the 1064:disadvantages of these tools. 1: 2936:to the pages. Thank you. -- 2000:23:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1966:22:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1956:22:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1931:08:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1911:00:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1880:21:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1864:21:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1834:21:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1804:21:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1792:18:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1735:18:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1689:18:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1646:17:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1570:17:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1556:16:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1538:16:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1521:16:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1504:16:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1476:16:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1461:10:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1429:10:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1392:10:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1270:08:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1194:-- Lucid Information Systems 1145:08:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1112:-- Lucid Information Systems 1033:23:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1023:23:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1003:23:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 992:23:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 946:19:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 496: 415: 388: 297: 265: 243: 180: 125: 109: 3077:the external links guideline 696: 600: 134: 3383:wikipedia is not a linkfarm 3154:WP:EL#What_should_be_linked 1947:methylenedioxyphenylacetone 1787:here. Hope this helps. -- 1196:http://www.lucidsystems.org 1140:Answer in next section. -- 118:and please don't forget to 3545: 3381:. The answer is simple. 1602:The way you are adding is 998:Sorry, forgot to sign it. 386:things get to that point. 182:I am the main operator of 3446:21:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3432:21:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3423:20:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3372:20:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3356:10:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3343:10:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3336:the notability guidelines 3288:07:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3257:00:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 3211:15:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3135:08:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 3109:14:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 3003:09:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 2968:09:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 2947:Removal of external links 2941:23:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2874:17:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2863:17:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 2848:18:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2801:18:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2788:18:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2778:18:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2768:17:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2727:16:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2649:16:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2615:09:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2595:00:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2576:00:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 2566:23:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2547:10:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2538:08:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2451:03:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2440:21:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2380:14:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2358:14:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2337:13:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2300:12:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2287:12:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2246:10:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2197:14:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2142:11:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2129:11:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2089:10:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2051:08:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2042:08:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 2009:00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 1619:22:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1493:The Barnstar of Diligence 1489: 1337:Lucid Information Systems 1082:. We are suppressed that 956:22:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 241: 179: 143: 107: 2306:Moving Pictures Magazine 1467:129.44.190.102 link spam 1170:Storage service provider 1166:Storage service provider 1160:Storage service provider 1151:Storage service provider 1028:Ah, thought you were... 648:This user is armed with 618:This user is armed with 426:and <references/: --> 389:The answer in a nutshell 268:ON EXTERNAL LINK REMOVAL 110:Welcome to my talk page. 3334:. Also have a look at 2473:, and in lesser extend 2100:, you were only adding 1829:Hope this explains. -- 1625:Spam response follow up 1341:http://lucidsystems.org 1114:http://lucidsystems.org 1073:http://lucidsystems.org 731:Talk started 20/3/2006 378:for blacklisting (even 347:for more information'). 324:appropriate; also read 3065:the citation guideline 2184:). Still, you have a 1018:will do the trick. -- 714:automatically archived 298:My view in a nutshell: 3471:of past discussions. 3243:comment was added by 2958:comment was added by 2635:comment was added by 2079:comment was added by 1943:Titanium isopropoxide 1897:comment was added by 1873:user talk:Mikeszyszka 1850:comment was added by 1675:comment was added by 1415:comment was added by 978:comment was added by 135:Dirk Beetstra 42:of past discussions. 2794:conflict of interest 2621:The European Library 2186:conflict of interest 1824:conflict of interest 1785:conflict of interest 1783:, and you do have a 1327:Sunday, 4 March 2007 646:Warning to Spammers: 3061:the manual of style 2792:Expand: You have a 2533:See you around! -- 1937:titanium isoproxide 1871:I have answered on 963:Americium(II) oxide 616:Warning to Vandals: 155:Knowledge (XXG) ads 2348:Krypton difluoride 712:This talk page is 462:unreliable sources 18:User talk:Beetstra 3532: 3531: 3483: 3482: 3477:current talk page 3322: 3308:comment added by 3283:. Thank you. -- 3260: 3156:. Unfortunately, 3081:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 3044: 3030:comment added by 2985:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 2971: 2916: 2902:comment added by 2835:are adding them ( 2827: 2813:comment added by 2754: 2740:comment added by 2694:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 2671:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 2652: 2435:. Thank you. -- 2414: 2400:comment added by 2343:Krypton compounds 2332:. Thank you. -- 2315:MovingPicturesMag 2236: 2222:comment added by 2168: 2154:comment added by 2092: 1995:. Thank you. -- 1920:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 1914: 1867: 1767: 1753:comment added by 1692: 1639:User talk:HeroJoe 1598: 1584:comment added by 1509: 1508: 1456:. Thank you. -- 1432: 1375: 1361:comment added by 1218: 1204:comment added by 1136: 1122:comment added by 1038:PrinterSetup Page 995: 970:Americium dioxide 918:re: Rob Dickinson 915: 914: 910: 909: 692: 691: 687: 686: 657: 656: 627: 626: 306:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 237: 236: 231: 175: 174: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3536: 3510: 3485: 3484: 3462: 3461: 3455: 3412: 3406: 3402: 3396: 3332:reliable sources 3321: 3302: 3238: 3100: 3094: 3069:reliable sources 3043: 3024: 2953: 2915: 2896: 2826: 2807: 2753: 2734: 2717: 2711: 2630: 2609: 2603: 2413: 2394: 2235: 2216: 2167: 2148: 2074: 1892: 1845: 1766: 1747: 1696:Re definition. 1670: 1597: 1578: 1546:Magister Musicae 1487: 1480: 1479: 1410: 1374: 1355: 1217: 1198: 1135: 1116: 1080:Snort_(software) 1017: 1011: 973: 702: 695: 669: 661: 647: 639: 631: 617: 611: 604: 599: 588: 582: 575: 569: 564: 558: 554: 548: 532: 526: 522: 516: 512: 506: 473: 467: 456: 450: 446: 440: 436: 430: 417:Reliable sources 376:wikiproject spam 359: 353: 239: 207: 169: 163: 156: 148: 141: 105: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3506: 3459: 3410: 3404: 3400: 3394: 3364: 3303: 3296: 3239:—The preceding 3223: 3221:Undoing My Link 3117: 3098: 3092: 3025: 3011: 2954:—The preceding 2949: 2904:203.206.120.230 2897: 2882: 2856: 2808: 2735: 2715: 2709: 2631:—The preceding 2625:Dear Beetstra, 2623: 2607: 2601: 2584: 2555: 2395: 2390: 2383: 2382: 2369: 2345: 2308: 2217: 2178:reliable source 2149: 2075:—The preceding 2067: 2026:upload function 1974: 1939: 1893:—The preceding 1888: 1846:—The preceding 1842: 1748: 1743: 1671:—The preceding 1654: 1627: 1604:spam/canvassing 1579: 1563:user talk:Cada2 1548: 1469: 1411:—The preceding 1400: 1356: 1351: 1304:have suggested. 1199: 1153: 1117: 1040: 1015: 1009: 974:—The preceding 966: 920: 911: 828:14 - 13/12/2010 814:12 - 13/11/2009 807:11 - 17/05/2009 800:10 - 03/02/2009 688: 658: 653: 645: 628: 615: 595: 586: 580: 573: 567: 562: 556: 552: 546: 530: 524: 520: 514: 510: 504: 500: 494: 471: 465: 454: 448: 444: 438: 434: 428: 419: 413: 412: 392: 357: 351: 301: 270: 263: 247: 233: 232: 167: 161: 154: 137: 136: 133: 131: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3542: 3540: 3530: 3529: 3524: 3521: 3516: 3511: 3504: 3499: 3494: 3491: 3481: 3480: 3463: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3345: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3277: 3274:not a linkfamr 3235: 3234: 3222: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3116: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3102: 3084: 3049: 3010: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2995: 2988: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2930:not a linkfarm 2881: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2855: 2854:Protein images 2852: 2851: 2850: 2804: 2803: 2790: 2771: 2770: 2730: 2729: 2705: 2704: 2697: 2686: 2674: 2666: 2658: 2657: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2588:nl:homeopathie 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2540: 2531: 2519: 2516:user:shadowbot 2512: 2490: 2443: 2442: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2373: 2371: 2367: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2289: 2280: 2277: 2271: 2249: 2248: 2200: 2199: 2145: 2144: 2131: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2054: 2053: 2044: 2020: 2019: 2012: 2011: 2002: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1938: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1923: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1827: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1798: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1727: 1726: 1714: 1706: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1575: 1573: 1572: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1524: 1523: 1507: 1506: 1496: 1495: 1490: 1488: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1331: 1329: 1323: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1287: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1273: 1272: 1263: 1248: 1237: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1039: 1036: 1026: 1025: 965: 960: 959: 958: 919: 916: 913: 912: 908: 907: 901: 900: 894: 893: 887: 886: 880: 879: 873: 872: 866: 865: 859: 858: 852: 851: 845: 844: 838: 837: 831: 830: 824: 823: 821:13 - 27/5/2010 817: 816: 810: 809: 803: 802: 796: 795: 793:9 - 22/09/2008 789: 788: 786:8 - 31/03/2008 782: 781: 779:7 - 06/11/2007 775: 774: 772:6 - 29/07/2007 768: 767: 765:5 - 15/03/2007 761: 760: 758:4 - 05/03/2007 754: 753: 751:3 - 05/02/2007 747: 746: 744:2 - 29/11/2006 740: 739: 733: 732: 728: 727: 726: 710: 693: 690: 689: 685: 684: 671: 659: 655: 654: 643: 641: 629: 625: 624: 612: 602: 596: 571:expert-subject 495: 414: 393: 390: 372: 371: 364: 361: 348: 302: 299: 266: 264: 260: 259: 242: 235: 234: 213:Talk to COIBot 206: 190:on my talkpage 181: 177: 176: 173: 172: 158: 150: 149: 138: 132: 129: 127: 123: 117: 111: 108: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3541: 3528: 3525: 3522: 3520: 3517: 3515: 3512: 3509: 3505: 3503: 3500: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3490: 3487: 3486: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3469: 3464: 3457: 3456: 3447: 3444: 3443:Dirk Beetstra 3440: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3421: 3420:Dirk Beetstra 3416: 3409: 3399: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3361: 3357: 3354: 3353:Dirk Beetstra 3350: 3346: 3344: 3341: 3340:Dirk Beetstra 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3299: 3293: 3289: 3286: 3285:Dirk Beetstra 3282: 3278: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3220: 3212: 3209: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3177: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3129: 3126: 3123: 3114: 3110: 3107: 3106:Dirk Beetstra 3103: 3097: 3090: 3089:refrigeration 3085: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3073:verifyability 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3021: 3019: 3014: 3008: 3004: 3001: 3000:Dirk Beetstra 2996: 2993: 2989: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2960:203.164.55.34 2957: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2938:Dirk Beetstra 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2879: 2875: 2872: 2871:Dirk Beetstra 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2861: 2853: 2849: 2846: 2845:Dirk Beetstra 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2802: 2799: 2798:Dirk Beetstra 2795: 2791: 2789: 2786: 2785:Dirk Beetstra 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2776: 2769: 2766: 2765:Dirk Beetstra 2762: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2728: 2725: 2724:Dirk Beetstra 2721: 2714: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2684: 2679: 2675: 2672: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2626: 2620: 2616: 2613: 2612:Dirk Beetstra 2606: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2593: 2589: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2573:Dirk Beetstra 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2564: 2560: 2552: 2548: 2545: 2544:Dirk Beetstra 2541: 2539: 2536: 2535:Dirk Beetstra 2532: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2491: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2441: 2438: 2437:Dirk Beetstra 2434: 2430: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2387: 2381: 2378: 2377:Dirk Beetstra 2365: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2349: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2334:Dirk Beetstra 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2312: 2305: 2301: 2298: 2297:Dirk Beetstra 2294: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2284:Dirk Beetstra 2281: 2278: 2276: 2275:the help desk 2272: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2257: 2253: 2247: 2244: 2243:Dirk Beetstra 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2198: 2195: 2194:Dirk Beetstra 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2143: 2140: 2139:Dirk Beetstra 2136: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2126:Dirk Beetstra 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2070: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2048:Dirk Beetstra 2045: 2043: 2040: 2039:Dirk Beetstra 2036: 2032: 2027: 2022: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2006:Dirk Beetstra 2003: 2001: 1998: 1997:Dirk Beetstra 1994: 1990: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1972:Bobobo Images 1971: 1967: 1964: 1963:Dirk Beetstra 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1948: 1944: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1928:Dirk Beetstra 1924: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1885: 1881: 1878: 1877:Dirk Beetstra 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1831:Dirk Beetstra 1828: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1790: 1789:Dirk Beetstra 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1732:Dirk Beetstra 1729: 1728: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1707: 1704: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1651: 1647: 1644: 1643:Dirk Beetstra 1640: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1616:Dirk Beetstra 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1571: 1568: 1567:Dirk Beetstra 1564: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1554: 1545: 1539: 1536: 1535:Dirk Beetstra 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1458:Dirk Beetstra 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1406: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1389:Dirk Beetstra 1386: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1348: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1315: 1311: 1308: 1302: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1267:Dirk Beetstra 1264: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1246: 1245:WP:NOTABILITY 1242: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206:60.234.250.84 1203: 1197: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1156: 1150: 1146: 1143: 1142:Dirk Beetstra 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1124:60.234.250.84 1121: 1115: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1091: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1062: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1045: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1024: 1021: 1020:Dirk Beetstra 1014: 1013:deletebecause 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1001: 996: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 971: 964: 961: 957: 954: 953:Dirk Beetstra 950: 949: 948: 947: 944: 940: 937: 934: 931: 927: 923: 917: 906: 903: 902: 899: 896: 895: 892: 889: 888: 885: 882: 881: 878: 875: 874: 871: 868: 867: 864: 861: 860: 857: 854: 853: 850: 847: 846: 843: 840: 839: 836: 835:15 - 5/7/2011 833: 832: 829: 826: 825: 822: 819: 818: 815: 812: 811: 808: 805: 804: 801: 798: 797: 794: 791: 790: 787: 784: 783: 780: 777: 776: 773: 770: 769: 766: 763: 762: 759: 756: 755: 752: 749: 748: 745: 742: 741: 738: 735: 734: 730: 729: 725: 723: 719: 715: 709: 708: 707: 701: 697: 682: 681: 676: 672: 670: 668: 663: 662: 652: 651: 642: 640: 638: 633: 632: 623: 621: 613: 610: 606: 605: 601: 597: 594: 593:template). 592: 585: 577: 572: 561: 551: 544: 540: 536: 529: 519: 509: 499: 493: 491: 487: 482: 481: 477: 470: 463: 458: 453: 443: 433: 425:(<ref: --> 424: 418: 411: 409: 406: 402: 398: 387: 385: 381: 377: 369: 365: 362: 356: 349: 346: 342: 338: 337: 336: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 296: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275: 269: 262: 257: 252: 246: 240: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 204: 203: 198: 197: 192: 191: 185: 178: 170: 164: 159: 157: 152: 151: 147: 142: 139: 124: 121: 116: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3507: 3472: 3466: 3365: 3310:Art.pugachev 3300: 3297: 3236: 3228: 3224: 3118: 3115:Recipe links 3022: 3015: 3012: 2950: 2933: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2883: 2857: 2815:Fleurstigter 2805: 2775:Fleurstigter 2772: 2742:Fleurstigter 2731: 2677: 2637:Fleurstigter 2627: 2624: 2585: 2556: 2444: 2423: 2419: 2391: 2346: 2313: 2309: 2265: 2260: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2180:, and it is 2146: 2137:as well. -- 2096:Please read 2081:139.13.83.49 2071: 2068: 1977: 1975: 1951: 1940: 1889: 1843: 1744: 1702: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1637:Answered on 1628: 1574: 1561:Answered on 1549: 1492: 1470: 1441: 1401: 1352: 1326: 1314:PrinterSetup 1284:PrinterSetup 1230: 1224:Lucidsystems 1193: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1163: 1157: 1154: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1095:PrinterSetup 1092: 1088: 1084:PrinterSetup 1069:PrinterSetup 1066: 1061:PrinterSetup 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044:PrinterSetup 1041: 1027: 997: 967: 943:Andwhatsnext 941: 938: 935: 932: 928: 924: 921: 877:21 - current 764: 737:1 - 7/9/2006 721: 718:MiszaBot III 713: 711: 704: 703: 678: 664: 644: 634: 614: 590: 578: 542: 538: 534: 501: 497: 483: 459: 420: 416: 394: 383: 379: 373: 340: 334: 329: 321: 313: 303: 292: 273: 271: 267: 248: 244: 229:Page reports 225:User reports 221:Link reports 200: 194: 188:new subject 187: 168:show another 112: 78: 43: 37: 3465:This is an 3304:—Preceding 3294:Iseo widget 3122:BBC Recipes 3026:—Preceding 3009:Re: Marking 2898:—Preceding 2809:—Preceding 2736:—Preceding 2582:Homeopathie 2559:SVN Rev 660 2396:—Preceding 2218:—Preceding 2150:—Preceding 1953:Microswitch 1852:Mikeszyszka 1749:—Preceding 1725:citations." 1580:—Preceding 1357:—Preceding 1247:guidelines. 1200:—Preceding 1118:—Preceding 680:AntiSpamBot 620:VandalProof 316:defines as 184:User:COIBot 36:This is an 3527:Archive 10 3379:good faith 2860:TimVickers 2352:Physchim62 2182:verifyable 2108:(see also 1976:Why don't 1811:article... 1454:a linkfarm 1398:interviews 528:notability 518:importance 274:understand 245:Responding 98:Archive 10 3519:Archive 7 3514:Archive 6 3508:Archive 5 3502:Archive 4 3497:Archive 3 3489:Archive 1 2563:Reedy Boy 2433:WP:WPSPAM 2293:help desk 2106:reference 2059:Kid Sonic 2017:Kid Sonic 1982:Kid Sonic 1801:Editatrix 1777:reference 1755:Editatrix 1720:(reading 1718:reference 1448:(care to 1446:citations 405:WT:WPSPAM 314:wikipedia 196:WT:WPSPAM 162:file info 122:your post 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 3429:Nardman1 3408:cookbook 3369:Nardman1 3318:contribs 3306:unsigned 3253:contribs 3245:Anoradio 3241:unsigned 3146:Tortilla 3040:contribs 3028:unsigned 2994:as well. 2981:spamming 2956:unsigned 2926:spamming 2912:contribs 2900:unsigned 2823:contribs 2811:unsigned 2750:contribs 2738:unsigned 2663:spamming 2645:contribs 2633:unsigned 2605:disputed 2410:contribs 2398:unsigned 2232:contribs 2220:unsigned 2164:contribs 2152:unsigned 2077:unsigned 1907:contribs 1895:unsigned 1860:contribs 1848:unsigned 1763:contribs 1751:unsigned 1685:contribs 1673:unsigned 1652:last try 1594:contribs 1582:unsigned 1577:disturb. 1438:spamming 1425:contribs 1413:unsigned 1381:spamming 1371:contribs 1359:unsigned 1234:contribs 1214:contribs 1202:unsigned 1155:Hello, 1132:contribs 1120:unsigned 1077:Inkscape 988:contribs 980:Brichcja 976:unsigned 706:Archives 543:contents 423:cite.php 217:listings 3468:archive 3362:recipes 3328:WP:NPOV 3270:WP:SPAM 3032:Dreindl 3023:dreindl 2934:content 2592:Sikkema 2524:WP:SPAM 2495:WP:SPAM 2487:WP:SPAM 2483:WP:SPAM 2471:WP:SPAM 2429:WP:SPAM 2420:content 2322:WP:SPAM 2224:12barde 2174:WP:CITE 2156:12barde 2098:WP:SPAM 1886:content 1840:Stopped 1816:WP:SPAM 1698:WP:SPAM 1632:HeroJoe 1518:ElKevbo 1514:Ekalden 1501:ElKevbo 1473:ElKevbo 1442:en mass 1260:WP:SPAM 675:cookies 539:article 341:content 285:WP:SPAM 256:poke me 202:WP:COIN 39:archive 3387:WP:NOT 3349:WP:COI 3281:WP:COI 3013:Dirk, 2992:WP:COI 2701:WP:COI 2463:WP:NOT 2355:(talk) 2330:WP:COI 2215:links. 2135:WP:COI 2112:& 2031:WP:MOS 1989:WP:MOS 1608:WP:NOT 1252:WP:NOT 1241:WP:MOS 650:Spamda 584:expand 555:ed or 384:before 277:WP:NOT 209:COIBot 3439:WP:EL 3415:WP:EL 3391:WP:EL 3266:WP:EL 2977:WP:EL 2922:WP:EL 2720:WP:EL 2690:WP:EL 2683:WP:EL 2528:WP:EL 2508:WP:EL 2503:WP:EL 2499:WP:EL 2479:WP:RS 2467:WP:EL 2448:Gmacp 2402:Gmacp 2364:inorg 2326:WP:EL 2259:c) I 2118:WP:EL 2110:WP:RS 2102:links 2035:WP:EL 1993:WP:EL 1899:Gmacp 1875:. -- 1826:here. 1820:WP:EL 1773:WP:EL 1722:WP:EL 1711:WP:EL 1677:Gmacp 1641:. -- 1614:. -- 1612:WP:EL 1586:Cada2 1565:. -- 1553:Cada2 1417:Gmacp 1385:WP:EL 1363:Gmacp 1317:page. 1256:WP:EL 1030:Chris 1000:Chris 870:20 - 863:19 - 856:18 - 849:17 - 842:16 - 476:wp:rs 401:WT:EL 310:WP:EL 293:first 281:WP:EL 251:watch 171:– #42 16:< 3403:and 3398:dmoz 3389:and 3314:talk 3268:and 3249:talk 3176:page 3079:and 3057:blue 3036:talk 2964:talk 2908:talk 2837:spam 2819:talk 2761:sign 2746:talk 2713:dmoz 2688:Per 2678:only 2641:talk 2511:way. 2475:WP:A 2424:only 2406:talk 2388:Spam 2324:and 2261:want 2228:talk 2190:WP:A 2160:talk 2114:WP:A 2085:talk 2069:Hi, 2033:and 1991:and 1903:talk 1856:talk 1781:spam 1759:talk 1703:only 1681:talk 1590:talk 1531:feed 1450:join 1421:talk 1367:talk 1349:hotz 1258:and 1228:talk 1210:talk 1128:talk 984:talk 905:25 - 898:24 - 891:23 - 884:22 - 591:that 550:prod 508:stub 490:here 488:and 486:here 452:cite 442:note 368:this 355:dmoz 345:here 326:this 318:spam 308:and 295:. 289:WP:A 287:and 120:sign 115:here 3208:DLX 3132:DLX 2458:not 2431:or 1978:you 716:by 560:AfD 535:may 523:or 432:ref 403:or 330:may 199:or 3523:→ 3493:← 3411:}} 3405:{{ 3401:}} 3395:{{ 3320:) 3316:• 3255:) 3251:• 3127:, 3099:}} 3096:cn 3093:{{ 3071:, 3067:, 3042:) 3038:• 2966:) 2914:) 2910:• 2869:-- 2841:we 2825:) 2821:• 2752:) 2748:• 2716:}} 2710:{{ 2696:). 2647:) 2643:• 2608:}} 2602:{{ 2526:, 2477:, 2469:, 2465:, 2412:) 2408:• 2375:-- 2234:) 2230:• 2166:) 2162:• 2122:we 2087:) 1926:-- 1909:) 1905:• 1862:) 1858:• 1765:) 1761:• 1687:) 1683:• 1610:, 1596:) 1592:• 1427:) 1423:• 1373:) 1369:• 1334:-- 1254:, 1216:) 1212:• 1134:) 1130:• 1016:}} 1010:{{ 990:) 986:• 683:. 587:}} 581:{{ 574:}} 568:{{ 563:}} 557:{{ 553:}} 547:{{ 531:}} 525:{{ 521:}} 515:{{ 511:}} 505:{{ 472:}} 469:cn 466:{{ 455:}} 449:{{ 445:}} 439:{{ 435:}} 429:{{ 410:. 380:if 358:}} 352:{{ 322:is 283:, 279:, 227:- 223:- 219:- 215:- 211:- 165:– 94:→ 64:← 3479:. 3312:( 3276:. 3259:. 3247:( 3083:. 3034:( 2970:. 2962:( 2906:( 2817:( 2744:( 2703:. 2651:. 2639:( 2489:. 2404:( 2372:2 2368:2 2226:( 2158:( 2091:. 2083:( 1922:. 1913:. 1901:( 1866:. 1854:( 1757:( 1691:. 1679:( 1588:( 1431:. 1419:( 1365:( 1231:· 1226:( 1208:( 1126:( 994:. 982:( 722:7 622:. 447:/ 437:/ 370:) 258:. 205:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index