153:. Either of these are good ideas because editing under your real name can leave you vulnerable to harassment, especially in your case, where it would be fairly easy to get a hold of your personal information. Also, despite the fact that your area of work offers you a higher level of expertise in some areas, I have found that anonymity can be a blessing. It is something for you to decide. I hope you enjoy working here. It appears that you've not had much interaction with other users. For the most part, I have found the community to be friendly and welcoming, and hope you will experience the same as you become more involved. Feel free to ask me any question; I am qualified as an
36:
129:
hello, thanks - I tried to do myself justice but of course I appreciate neutrality and would love to move on and write about other things, most likely literature. I gladly accept and welcome your offer - please edit mercilessly and appropriately. I'm curious to see what remains! On an unrelated note:
110:
both cover those topics. As I said, your edits to the article do not seem to be a problem, but I would like to warn you that it is possible, even probable, that someone will question your neutrality in the future. Thank you for your contributions, but perhaps you should consider writing about topics
144:
I will work on cleaning up the article and most likely ask you for clarification on several points in the near future. Glad you enjoyed my userpage. I love reading and have spent a great deal of my time here writing about books. About your username, according to
101:
Hello, Dr. Birkenkrahe. I was looking over the article about yourself and your edits to it. None of them seem to be problematic, but I thought I would make you aware of a few of our policies about writing about oneself.
149:, you could create another account while retiring this one. Doing that, you would have to make sure that this account is not used again, as sockpuppetry (see previous link) is very serious. However, you could also
173:
Would you like to have another persons opinion on this too? I think one should use one's real name for writing an article about oneself, because that is more honest and I appreciate that honesty.--
197:
True, but there are privacy concerns, and if he refrains from editing about himself, then it would not be a problem to edit under another name. As I mentioned before, it is a personal choice.
115:
points out, the generally accepted way to fix an article without editing yourself is to request the improvements from a neutral editor. I would be glad to do that for you if you like. Cheers,
130:
you've got a nice user page! Tolstoy, Asimov, Bradbury, yes! And while I got your attention: do you think it more appropriate to edit using another than my birth name? Cheers!
71:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
79:
107:
60:
178:
103:
43:
174:
47:
199:
159:
117:
87:
157:, which means I can answer most basic questions about Knowledge and the way things work here.
131:
17:
154:
65:
46:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge takes
146:
112:
150:
83:
35:
205:
182:
171:
Do you think it more appropriate to edit using another than my birth name?
165:
139:
123:
91:
25:
50:
very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the
78:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
58:
of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a
34:
72:
31:File copyright problem with File:Marcusspeh.jpg
8:
111:not directly related to yourself. As
82:. Thanks again for your cooperation.
7:
147:our policy about multiple accounts
14:
18:Prof. Dr. M. Birkenkrahe, Berlin
108:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
80:media copyright questions page
1:
26:10:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
226:
206:18:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
183:17:44, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
166:02:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
151:request a username change
140:20:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
124:14:26, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
92:22:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
135:
42:Thank you for uploading
21:
104:Knowledge:Autobiography
66:image description page
39:
38:
44:File:Marcusspeh.jpg
40:
217:
204:
202:
164:
162:
122:
120:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
216:
215:
214:
200:
198:
175:Greatgreenwhale
160:
158:
118:
116:
99:
73:your upload log
33:
12:
11:
5:
223:
221:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
201:PrincessofLlyr
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
161:PrincessofLlyr
119:PrincessofLlyr
98:
95:
32:
29:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
222:
207:
203:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
168:
167:
163:
156:
152:
148:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
128:
127:
126:
125:
121:
114:
109:
105:
96:
94:
93:
89:
85:
81:
76:
74:
69:
67:
63:
62:
61:copyright tag
57:
53:
49:
45:
37:
30:
28:
27:
23:
19:
170:
100:
77:
70:
59:
55:
51:
41:
15:
132:birkenkrahe
16:testing --
48:copyright
84:Eeekster
54:and the
155:adopter
113:WP:AUTO
64:to the
52:license
56:source
97:Hello
179:talk
136:talk
106:and
88:talk
22:talk
181:)
138:)
90:)
75:.
68:.
24:)
177:(
134:(
86:(
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
