User talk:BloodmoonIvy

722:

conflict of interests and deceptive. Not filling all of their kickstarter rewards is fraudulent. Do you realize that they raised 22 times the money they were asking for? Is it okay and acceptable that they have not filled all of their back rewards? Is it cool that they do not even list the names of all of their backers on their own website? You think you've outsmarted someone just because you have deleted an edit they made? Hardly. The word is still going to get out! There is a blog or two I know of that's going to post up those issues. There are also the Google+ communities for Tephra, Steampunk, Tabletop Gaming, and Kickstarter (just to name a few) where this information can be posted. I'm not mad because I bought the game because I was not one of the suckers that got tricked. I am mad that people are falling for the Cracked Monocle shenanigans and wasting their money on a product that is sub-par information wise and a company that will turn their backs on them when they get money in hand?

746:

know there has been problem after problem. You say the information is not relevant to the article but it is. How about someone looking for a new game to play? With the rising costs of paper products customers need to be informed about fraudulent or controversial practices. I would definitely say that Cracked Monocle fits the bill on those counts. What is wrong with the potential customer base being informed before they make a decision? I am not trying to be a jerk but something simple like posting the names of the backers on their website should have been the first reward fulfilled. That is EASY stuff! How can they attend convention after convention with a large entourage and still make claims of being short on cash for filling rewards? They earned over TWENTY TWO times MORE than their goal. At this point, the whole mess has left the realm of all things normal and decent and went straight to the strange and utterly ridiculous!

730:- I am assuming you are trying to be constructive, please grant the same benefit of the doubt, as well. I know RPG Guru made the edit. I've been talking to him, as well; there was no confusion. Both you and he added similar thing. You seem to be bringing in a lot of outside info that isn't relevant to the article. My main concern is that Knowledge has strict rules for what can be posted and what can't. If you have a reliable news source, that's one thing. If you look at the article, you'll find I already summarized the Kickstarter thing based on what conforms to what we can include. Please discuss on the talk page instead of continually posting the same thing. 1164: 1087: 1014: 941: 472: 791:

No, I was trying to show you that this escapade is ridiculous. I should have talked instead of resorting to sarcasm. You claimed that you wanted to use talk to clear it up but you insisted on editing out what I put in without discussion. How is showing the truth to other people not being objective?

790:

All I want to know is how stating factual truths in the form of concerns expressed by unhappy customers is inflammatory? People should be aware of what is going on. I admit that I got a little heated in my response. Yes, I did say I would post it on blogs and Google+ communities. Was I serious?

745:

It's kind of strange that you erased everything instead of just the RPGGeek stuff. BTW, most of that stuff is covered elsewhere. I know you might *think* you are being impartial but you are NOT. All one has to do is read the comments on Kickstarter and on their own forums and Cracked Monocle to

721:

Thanks for the tip! I have a tip for you. Check who made that last edit - it wasn't me! It was somebody by the name of Rpgguru. I understand how you might be confused on this issue but there should be no confusion at all. Good reviews on Amazon posted up by people that worked on the game is a

806:

I invited you to discuss this on the talk page of the article. Instead of posting feedback on the compromise edit, you just put the same thing back in multiple times after being asked politely to stop. That means I have to stop asking quite so nicely and use Knowledge policy to get the article

1026:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1099:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

774:

At this point I am moving the issue to Dispute Resolution. I have advised you to use the page's talk page for this, but you seem to insist on including edits that do not meet Knowledge's standard for inclusion, despite my attempts to seek a compromise on the matter.

953:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

896:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1127: 1054: 981: 1111:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1038:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 965:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 522: 518: 40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place 840: 681: 62:

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Knowledge, you might want to consider being "

836: 677: 575: 167: 571: 762: 850: 691: 638: 585: 532: 211: 71: 152: 1227: 189: 846: 687: 634: 581: 528: 1141: 1068: 995: 921: 59: 628: 483: 478: 446: 37: 624: 58: 1231: 1137: 1064: 991: 917: 510: 398: 207: 185: 843:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 684:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 631:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 578:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 525:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 796: 758: 262: 202: 362: 312: 1206: 1120: 1047: 974: 375: 330: 316: 125: 119: 908:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1219: 1175: 1153: 1132: 1059: 986: 913: 438: 299: 1223: 1171: 1157: 394: 290: 240: 236: 129: 828: 792: 754: 669: 258: 219: 420: 416: 245: 198: 827:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

668:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

615:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

562:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

509:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

338: 227: 194: 563: 325: 294: 223: 111: 63: 31: 1108: 1035: 962: 433: 384: 380: 371: 367: 67: 49: 750: 429: 266: 232: 53: 1235: 909: 321: 307: 253: 158: 303: 162: 115: 1202: 1095: 1022: 949: 931: 885: 876: 866: 808: 776: 731: 707: 654: 601: 548: 390: 357: 75: 1104: 1031: 958: 905: 889: 74:

for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

1119:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1046:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 973:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 904:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 487:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed. 442: 1116: 1043: 970: 901: 893: 424: 249: 70:

to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click

1189: 1112: 1039: 966: 897: 857: