Knowledge

User talk:BlackAce48

Source 📝

384: 450: 142: 21:
I have outlined my points in my edit summary, which you can find in the article history, that are based on actual Knowledge policy; in-depth weapons listings are game guide material, and if you want to include mention of the weapons it should be done briefly to outline the types of weapon, and should
84:
You haven't outlined them in prose or briefly, you have explicitly listed them in bullet-point format, which is unencyclopedic, and have added detail for every single one - there is a difference. This is not ownership, instead this comes from experience as an editor that has got several game-related
60:
False, weapons do not have to be game guide material. They are a part of the casual gaming experiences and one of the largest parts of the game. I have briefly outlined the weapons. If I provided tips & tricks then it would be game guide material, but since I just outlined them, you are wrong in
263:
Hi. With very few exceptions, you shouldn't remove content from another user's talk page. If you find the content objectionable, you can comment on it and ask the user politely to remove it, or, if it is violating some policy, you can ask an admin to enforce the policy. People will frequently react
584:
I removed your report. His recent edits were at least somewhat constructive (pointing out perceived flaws in the focus of a few articles, and confining said complaints to the talk page), if somewhat overly loquacious and angry. This really doesn't seem to rise to the level of a violation requiring
99:
Putting them in bullet-point format is perfectly fine and counts as an outline. It can also pass for encyclopedic. There is nothing there that would not be a part of casual gaming experience. I did add some detail because people need to know what the weapons do, you don't just automatically know.
85:
articles to Good Article status. I have at no point said your writing is poor - once again, you have rushed to an incorrect judgement, as I merely stated that your uncivil edit summaries reflect poorly on your editing skills. As you state, this is probably best taken up at the video game project.
661:. That is because A2 (foreign language articles) only applies if the article already exists on that language's Knowledge. In this case, the article (which Google Translate says is in Norwegian) is not found on the Norwegian Knowledge. Therefore, the correct procedure is to tag the article with 104:. Please stop, I already did. Maybe you have gotten articles to "good-article" status, but you saying these weapons should not belong in the article will probably prevent it from doing so. Saying the controls for the game is indeed game guide material, but weaponry and a FEW DETAILS is not. 163:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
22:
be done in prose, not as lists. If you disagree then we will take this to the Wikiproject:Video game talk page and gain peer consensus there rather than debate it amongst ourselves which will ultimately be fruitless - let me know your thoughts.
467:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
774:
Please do not refactor other user's comments, as you recently did with your edit to AIV. If you wish to add your comment, add it below the user's post (indented). If you have any questions, feel free to message me on my talk page.
851:
with Twinkle left the page in a broken state (which I have now fixed) because there was more than one vandalism edit. In future, make sure you check every edit made with an automated tool before you save. Happy editing.
721:
I wasn't being disruptive though, he chose to execute the disruption by making incivil edits and out of the world accusations. I've said what I had to say, I won't engage with him unless he engages with me first.
893:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 625:, were very clear and concise and set forth why a block was necessary despite the lack of warning. I see you'd received some advice on better reporting to AIV, want to make sure you know you did those well. 545:). The second occasion was questioning you about this, which again is not vandalism. They are within their rights to object to the use of automated tools to revert edits they make to their own talk page. 227:
I have indef blocked the account for the legal threat. I suggest that you unwatch their page - if they keep up the abuse then they don't get unblocked; sort of nonsurvival of the thickest. Happy editing,
686:
The reason why I tagged it with A2 is because it was a foreign language article. I didn't know that it had to exist on another language's Knowledge as well. Will remember for the future. Thanks. --
303:
Ok I dont see why you undid my change if the release date is in 2010 (i already added it to future video games and i even have proof that it comes out next year so i removed it from 2009. (
541:
You appear to have used rollback a couple of times where the edit was not clear vandalism. The first occasion was the IP clearing their talkpage, which is not vandalism (see
671:, and follow the logging instructions. If it is not tranlsated after two weeks, it will be deleted. I have done it for this article, but let me know if you have questions. 800:
Sorry, I did not mean to refactor it, I just meant to add information on top of what he already reported, because the ip violated another rule after he was reported. --
740:
That will only work if he does not engage you further. You not responding even if he does continue to engage you will work either way. Just something to think about.
756:
For the record, I don't think you were being disruptive yourself, I just felt that the disruption was depending on your response and that a lack of it would end it.
560:
OK, slight miscalculation on the first edit, but the second one I had every right to revert. However, I reported him for his vandalism in the past. Check
615:
Well, I was going to come here and tell you good job, but you don't like Live and Let Die, so never mind. (Joking, of course!) Your last two reports to
348:
You see the box below where you edit, it says "Edit Summary" above it, and you can type in your reason for removing the content among other things. --
397: 918: 363: 334: 304: 412:
Hello BlackAce48, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of
528: 160: 319:
I see now, I looked at the article and it does, in the future, when removing content please provide an edit summary. Regards. --
914: 862: 473: 905:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
910: 503: 469: 464: 519:
I hate to bother you so soon after your last message about this, but your placement of a speedy deletion template on
491: 233: 65:? You are also violating it by saying that my writing is poor. Yeah, think about that. Oh and please do not 676: 367: 338: 308: 90: 50: 27: 564:
or his talk page for details. You might want to check all of the contributions before you get involved. --
498: 100:
Saying "once again rushed to an incorrect judgment" and "reflects poorly on your editing" indeed violates
784: 41:
in your edit summaries - do not tell an editor to "go away and leave it alone" as it shows you have not
586: 524: 150: 906: 858: 776: 665: 658: 550: 477: 432: 426: 229: 204: 146: 672: 626: 542: 455: 269: 212: 86: 46: 23: 527:, but in this case G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement) does. So I just changed the tag. :) 882: 873: 831: 757: 741: 711: 520: 390: 383: 169: 902: 886: 707: 418:
The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7.
901:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 801: 723: 687: 638: 596: 565: 349: 320: 284: 280: 244: 189: 182: 109: 101: 70: 62: 38: 424:
before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know.
898: 890: 853: 546: 449: 894: 821: 616: 595:
My bad. I guess I was too busy checking the other contributions. Sorry about that. --
561: 421: 413: 406: 265: 208: 66: 42: 825: 794: 485: 481: 165: 710:, it is not helpful and is being disruptive. I have left the same message to him. 157:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 460: 820:
What has to be determined now is if the reverted content is vandalism or a
480:
among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
69:
pages. If needed we will take this to that video game project. Regards --
922: 867: 837: 809: 761: 745: 731: 715: 695: 680: 646: 631: 604: 589: 573: 554: 531: 509: 438: 371: 357: 342: 328: 312: 292: 273: 264:
to those sort of edits as a violation of their personal space. Regards,
252: 237: 216: 197: 173: 141: 94: 78: 54: 31: 159: 154: 889:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
283:
and that's why I removed it. However, I will take your advice. --
279:
Yes I know, but telling other users to "shut the f up" violates
472:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 400:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
382: 149:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
333:
That's the thing, I don't know what an edit summary is. (
243:
OK, I will let administrators deal with further abuse. --
145:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
848: 657:
Hi BlackAce48! I have declined you speedy deletion for
623: 620: 637:
Well thanks, just glad to keep Knowledge running! :)--
484:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 203:
In the "gadgets" section of your preferences page (
881:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 476:to work towards wording and content that gains a 389:Hello, BlackAce48. You have new messages at 8: 459:according to the reverts you have made on 453:You currently appear to be engaged in an 488:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 45:and reflects poorly on your editing. 7: 523:was incorrect. A7 doesn't apply to 188:How do I get Twinkle installed? -- 61:this sense. You say I'm violating 14: 907:review the candidates' statements 770:Refactoring other user's comments 448: 158: 140: 653:A2 criteria for speedy deletion 416:- a page you tagged - because: 913:. For the Election committee, 883:Arbitration Committee election 874:ArbCom elections are now open! 174:01:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 95:15:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 79:14:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 55:23:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 32:23:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 923:14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 762:22:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 746:22:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 732:22:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 716:22:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 696:21:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 681:20:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 647:16:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 632:16:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC) 605:22:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 590:22:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 574:21:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 555:21:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 532:06:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 474:discuss controversial changes 223:re User talk:Xxspirit4musicxx 868:22:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 838:02:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 810:02:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 795:02:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 510:19:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 439:04:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 422:criteria for speedy deletion 909:and submit your choices on 372:18:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 358:18:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 343:18:52, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 329:18:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 313:18:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 293:17:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 274:17:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 253:16:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 238:16:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 217:05:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 198:16:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 938: 915:MediaWiki message delivery 405:Speedy deletion declined: 805: 769: 727: 691: 642: 600: 569: 353: 324: 299:Divinity 2: Ego Draconis 288: 259:A friendly bit of advice 248: 193: 123:talk with the ladies man 74: 706:Please disengage from 529:Reach Out to the Truth 387: 887:Arbitration Committee 611:Recent reports to AIV 386: 891:arbitration process 391:Avs5221's talk page 207:), enable Twinkle. 205:Special:Preferences 903:arbitration policy 482:dispute resolution 420:Please review the 398:remove this notice 388: 43:assumed good faith 866: 793: 759: 743: 713: 630: 507: 499:AnemoneProjectors 470:three-revert rule 465:three-revert rule 136:Your recent edits 929: 856: 834: 828: 791: 783: 781: 758: 742: 712: 708:User:GaGaOohLaLa 670: 664: 629: 508: 501: 463:. Note that the 452: 437: 435: 429: 401: 187: 181: 162: 144: 128: 127: 124: 116: 115: 112: 937: 936: 932: 931: 930: 928: 927: 926: 911:the voting page 877: 845: 832: 826: 818: 785: 777: 772: 704: 668: 662: 655: 613: 582: 539: 517: 497: 486:page protection 446: 433: 427: 425: 410: 402: 395: 301: 261: 225: 185: 179: 153:by typing four 151:sign your posts 138: 122: 119: 118: 110: 106: 105: 19: 12: 11: 5: 935: 933: 880: 876: 871: 844: 841: 817: 814: 813: 812: 771: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 751: 750: 749: 748: 735: 734: 703: 700: 699: 698: 654: 651: 650: 649: 612: 609: 608: 607: 581: 578: 577: 576: 538: 535: 516: 513: 445: 442: 409: 403: 394: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 331: 300: 297: 296: 295: 260: 257: 256: 255: 230:LessHeard vanU 224: 221: 220: 219: 178: 137: 134: 133: 132: 131: 130: 58: 57: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 934: 925: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 875: 872: 870: 869: 864: 860: 855: 850: 843:Twinkle usage 842: 840: 839: 835: 829: 823: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 798: 797: 796: 792: 790: 789: 782: 780: 763: 760: 755: 754: 753: 752: 747: 744: 739: 738: 737: 736: 733: 729: 725: 720: 719: 718: 717: 714: 709: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 678: 674: 673:Singularity42 667: 660: 659:Håkon aunbakk 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 635: 634: 633: 628: 627:Seraphimblade 624: 621: 618: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 593: 592: 591: 588: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 544: 536: 534: 533: 530: 526: 522: 514: 512: 511: 505: 500: 495: 493: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 466: 462: 458: 457: 451: 443: 441: 440: 436: 430: 423: 419: 415: 414:Thomas Grover 408: 407:Thomas Grover 404: 399: 392: 385: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 344: 340: 336: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317: 316: 314: 310: 306: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 276: 275: 271: 267: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241: 240: 239: 235: 231: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 199: 195: 191: 184: 176: 175: 171: 167: 161: 156: 152: 148: 143: 135: 129: 125: 114: 113: 103: 98: 97: 96: 92: 88: 87:SynergyBlades 83: 82: 81: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 56: 52: 48: 47:SynergyBlades 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 33: 29: 25: 24:SynergyBlades 16: 878: 846: 819: 787: 786: 778: 773: 705: 656: 614: 587:ShadowRanger 583: 540: 537:Rollback use 518: 494:from editing 489: 454: 447: 417: 411: 364:64.72.39.223 362:Ok thanks! ( 335:64.72.39.223 305:64.72.39.223 302: 262: 226: 177: 139: 121: 117: 108: 59: 20: 849:recent edit 824:violation.— 543:WP:BLANKING 490:you may be 899:topic bans 802:BlackAce48 724:BlackAce48 688:BlackAce48 666:notenglish 639:BlackAce48 597:BlackAce48 566:BlackAce48 525:cartridges 434:barbarian 350:BlackAce48 321:BlackAce48 285:BlackAce48 245:BlackAce48 190:BlackAce48 147:talk pages 111:BlackAce48 71:BlackAce48 37:Please be 17:Wipeout HD 895:site bans 854:OrangeDog 847:Hi. Your 702:Disengage 585:WP:AIV. — 580:IP Vandal 547:Quantpole 478:consensus 461:Jade Ewen 444:Jade Ewen 428:Skomorokh 779:Netalarm 521:.333 OKH 515:.333 OKH 456:edit war 396:You can 281:WP:CIVIL 266:Celestra 209:Tim Song 102:WP:CIVIL 63:WP:CIVIL 39:WP:CIVIL 827:Ryūlóng 492:blocked 166:SineBot 885:. The 822:WP:BLP 617:WP:AIV 562:WP:AIV 183:helpme 155:tildes 919:talk 806:talk 788:talk 728:talk 692:talk 677:talk 643:talk 622:and 601:talk 570:talk 551:talk 504:talk 368:talk 354:talk 339:talk 325:talk 309:talk 289:talk 270:talk 249:talk 234:talk 213:talk 194:talk 170:talk 91:talk 75:talk 51:talk 28:talk 879:Hi, 816:3RR 496:. 67:own 921:) 897:, 861:• 836:) 833:竜龙 808:) 730:) 722:-- 694:) 679:) 669:}} 663:{{ 645:) 619:, 603:) 572:) 553:) 431:, 370:) 356:) 345:) 341:) 327:) 315:) 311:) 291:) 272:) 251:) 236:) 215:) 196:) 186:}} 180:{{ 172:) 164:-- 107:-- 93:) 77:) 53:) 30:) 917:( 865:) 863:ε 859:τ 857:( 830:( 804:( 726:( 690:( 675:( 641:( 599:( 568:( 549:( 506:) 502:( 393:. 374:) 366:( 352:( 337:( 323:( 307:( 287:( 268:( 247:( 232:( 211:( 192:( 168:( 126:) 120:( 89:( 73:( 49:( 26:(

Index

SynergyBlades
talk
23:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
assumed good faith
SynergyBlades
talk
23:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
own
BlackAce48
talk
14:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
SynergyBlades
talk
15:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
BlackAce48
talk with the ladies man

talk pages
sign your posts
tildes

SineBot
talk
01:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
helpme
BlackAce48
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.