41:
No problem -- the user has made no contributions at all, since the name change. Presumably, it was a test to determine whether we would enforce the "no obscene usernams" policy. Having found the answer to their question, the user has apparently moved on (or changed their name).
57:, a term with a much stronger negative (and legal) connotation than "offensive," is not an accurate description of this type of violation. It's like calling a parking citation a violent felony. --
76:
are where people discuss how to make content on
Knowledge the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with
91:
73:
84:
24:
20:
43:
28:
58:
77:
54:
34:
53:
To be clear, the policy violated by CG was "no offensive usernames."
80:. What you say here will be public for others to see.
27:) which several Wikipedians considered obscene. --
19:is an a more palatable version of 2 usernames (
8:
33:Problem : This may lead to confusion with
7:
14:
1:
105:
69:Start a discussion with CG
46:22:48 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)
61:23:35 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC)
86:Start a discussion
96:
89:
87:
104:
103:
99:
98:
97:
95:
94:
93:
92:
90:
85:
83:
82:
12:
11:
5:
102:
100:
71:
70:
67:
66:
65:
64:
63:
62:
48:
47:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
101:
88:
81:
79:
75:
68:
60:
56:
52:
51:
50:
49:
45:
40:
39:
38:
36:
31:
30:
26:
22:
18:
72:
32:
16:
15:
74:Talk pages
37:. - Arno.
44:Uncle Ed
29:Uncle Ed
55:Obscene
59:NetEsq
23:&
25:that
21:this
78:CG
42:--
35:GC
17:CG
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.