Knowledge

User talk:CatPath

Source 📝

777:"Although the pathogenic potential of many of these variants remains to be established, recognition is an essential first step towards unravelling their ecological role(s) and pathogenic capability. Within this category are borreliae, including B. americana, B. bavariensis, B. bissettiae, B. californiensis, B. finlandensis, B. kurtenbachii, B. mayonii, B. sinica, B. tanukii, B. turdi and B. yangtzensis, which share their vector with known pathogenic species." 1339:. Therefore, even if it correct to remove the text from the quorum sensing entry, it seems unjustified to remove it from the entry for microbial cooperation. Perhaps you feel that microbial cooperation only applies in this case where there is a discrete threshold, which creates coordinated behavior in the entire community at once. However, I think this is an overly narrow interpretation. In summary, I think that you should have simply changed the subtitle 726: 516:
has been addressed in studies, but lac operon mutants that are insensitive to catabolite repression is explained in term of not requiring cAMP binding, and if the cAMP model is wrong, I'm still not sure how it could be affected by the glucose shutting down lactose permease. If one model is wrong, it doesn't mean the other is necessarily correct, therefore a clearer explanation of the different models is necessary.
1301:
and other bacteria + the mortality rate rises extremely when they are found together. Most studies are also done on this combination. + both are known as commensal organisms that are found in a bit part of the population. But I do understand your point, maybe I'll have to rewrite it a bit and mention that other bacteria are also often found together with C. albicans and then just give S. aureus as an example.
960:
share with the scientific world. It is to my benefit to promote QDB method, but it is to a greater benefit to the scientific world to introduce QDB method to replace the outdated Dot blot method and Western blot method. Do not you agree? By the way, the article you cited is also single sources, and no apparatus was used in the article. Please respond to my questions, otherwise I will undo your change..
2028: 1940: 1852: 1488: 356:, but basically all it says is don't push a POV against the interests of the encyclopaedia. I don't see any evidence of that in that case. Articles that are blatant spam get deleted because they're of no encyclopaedic value. Articles that are of encyclopaedic value, but - what? rely to heavily on sources from a single publisher? - may need some balancing/editing, but there's no need to delete them. 1802: 108: 1743: 1692: 1255:
extra references in the disease chapter, under systemic infections. In the introduction I left out the link between S. aureus and C. albicans. To my surprise there is not even a piece on this in the S. aureus wikipage. Which is rather weird to me because S. aureus and C. albicans biofilms are really important in terms of medical complications.
496:
why don't you fix the errors to make it more legible and aesthetic. Don't mean to be rude but you seem to be doing this alot. The information present was gotten from credible sources and represent a useful addition to the knowledge base of Bacteriology, so agin why don't you solve problems rather than just delete problems.
678:
first instead of Sharma. So now I have the tedious job of going back over my contributions and created articles where I used this one reference as two....grrr. I created my own problem. Thanks again and feel free to point out the editing mistakes that I make-it can only make things better. Best Regards,
1413:
Hi Cat, I've suggested some changes on the Jonathan Mitchell (writer) page. Specifically the removal of the published works section as apart from the Mu Rhythm Bluff the only page stating they were published is a primary source (Jonathan Mitchell's own blog). One of the sources cited says writing not
599:
by saying, "Unlike gastric MALT lymphoma, only a few cases of PCBCL have responded to antibiotics (42, 57, 91, 141, 166, 206). As in the case of C. psittaci and ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma, if B. burgdorferi is truly associated with PCBCL, then there is wide geographic variability and other factors
515:
I see that you have been making many edits to different pages on how the lac operon works and its inhibition by glucose. I don't think it is wise to make wholesale changes without making clearer in the text why what is generally accepted to true in textbook may not be accurate. I don't know if this
495:
Hi CatPath, u removed the tree that I created and said "‎Phylogeny: Deleted tree. Does not appear correctly on some screens. Should be presented as a figure, not as in-line text". I know you are trying to make the page clearer and more reader friendly, but instead of removing someones work altogether
472:
removing apparently valid sources for an article which has been copied from the non-deleted source does seem quite a surprising action. I presume there must be some reason that isn't visible to the rest of us, such as that the deleted sources have been spammed into there? Otherwise, one might imagine
1300:
the reason why I emphasize it, is simple: they are very often found together and they seem to help each other (or at least C. albicans helps S. aureus). + they communicatie with each other (there is a real specific interaction between them, this has not been shown , as far as I know, between candida
1254:
page. However both of them are often (very often) found together in biofilms. It has already been shown that S. aureus actually uses C. albicans hyphea to penetrate tissue. It even seems they somehow communicate (quorum sensing like system) with each other. So I added the small part again with some
1230:
Hello, You beat me to it, I was going to change it, and integrate it the genome topic since I do feel the need to mention it. I do not know who wrote it, but you are indeed correct, that part was a rather simple copy of the article text. I'll try to rewrite it so it is better suited to integrate in
1013:
Cathpath: I have followed your suggestion, please follow your response on the talk page. I would love to discuss further how to present this new information to the world appropriately with you. Please just take a couple of minutes try to understand why people consider it a new method. Believe me,
959:
Cathpath: If only you can honestly claim the 96-channel dot blot apparatus could fulfill what we have described in the article, then the QDB method I described here should be deleted. You should notice I have deleted all the relevant information about QDB plate. Indeed, it is the method I want to
549:
Since I'm new and unused to the quality guidelines, I doubt that attempting to edit the article alone will result in an edit that stays. I'd like it to have a clear, appropriately-cited part somewhere so the article will describe both sides of the argument. Where and how can I get help to make this
545:
I feel that parents and others need to be aware of the controversy and risks when making this decision. I've heard of parents who say they were not informed about some of the things that happened in the therapy (e.g. pinning down a sobbing child, physical injury, taking away a child's AAC device as
934:
suitable for high throughput analysis. I have a 96-channel dot blot apparatus sitting in my lab. The real problem with the new article that you created is that the new method described with the QDB plate is not notable. Multiple reliable sources describing the QDB plate (e.g., scientific review
677:
article. Just because it has passed its GA review doesn't mean that it doesn't need more reviews-you have proven that and I am glad. I think where I went wrong is that I plugged in the doi into an automated, web-based referencing bot that spit out the 'wiki-ready' mark-up code with Clarke's name
541:
I realize that my edit didn't match Knowledge's guidelines, so I'm okay with it going away. However, the issues I mentioned still remain: the autistic/parent community takes serious issue with many forms of ABA therapy for a number of ethical reasons. A lot of children and adults have been abused,
331:
let's just keep checking and if we see relevant source on the sensu, I'll be glad to extract and make the initial edit, if you post a citation there. (I did some drug discovery work on that organism years ago, as a medic hem / chem biol, not a microbiol). Alternatively on the sensu, I'd be glad to
351:
Editors with conflict of interests aren't a speedy deletion criterion, and not really ever a deletion criterion. Editors can, and do, edit articles where they have a conflict of interest. They don't have any restrictions above or beyond regular editors - just that we acknowledge it's a trickier
1604:
So I'm pretty new to Knowledge and just read a page that mentions re-reverting changes and how that's a bad thing so sorry about that. I do see that the change was discussed previously on the talk page for the article so I think that would be helpful to read. Sorry about re-reverting your change
1624:, I'm very much aware of what some in the autistic community think about Autism Speaks. An advocacy group can be controversial and still be an advocacy group. A number of reliable sources say that Autism Speaks is an advocacy organization. This discussion should continue on the Talk page of the 1151:
Korneev, K; Arbatsky, N; Molinaro, A; Palmigiano, A; Shaikhutdinova, R; Shneider, M; Pier, G; Kondakova, A; Sviriaeva, E; Sturiale, L; Garozzo, D; Kruglov, A; Nedospasov, S; Drutskaya, M; Knirel, Y; Kuprash, D (2015). "Structural Relationship of the Lipid A Acyl Groups to Activation of Murine
903:
The old dot blot format is not suitable for high throughput immunoblot analysis. The new method quantify individual dot to define the linear range of the analysis. Therefore, it is a significantly improvement of the old method. Let me know if you do not agree, so we can discuss further.
780:
So I think it's actually pretty irresponsible to call these 21 species "Lyme-associated" since the majority of them haven't been associated with Lyme disease at all. They've only been associated with host ticks which also carry the pathogenic lyme variants. Let me know your thoughts here.
791:"Nearly all human infections are caused by three B burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies: Borrelia garinii, Borrelia afzelii, and B burgdorferi sensu stricto. All three species cause Lyme borreliosis in Europe, whereas only B burgdorferi sensu stricto causes Lyme borreliosis in the USA." 612:, and there is no support in this best source, for the broad conclusion you stated, Bfpage, that Bb as a "pathogen is oncogenic and an infectious cause of cancer." Please. State what the experts state, and only that. We are not allowed, or in this case, qualified to do more. Le Prof 253:
Vaccine concerns are based on "However, some countries, such as the USA, do not routinely vaccinate with BCG, based on the uncertain efficacy against pulmonary TB in adolescents and adults, as well as the need to maintain the utility of tuberculin testing as a diagnostic test in the
576:. References 4 and 5 document the consensus of researchers with reliable, high quality medical references that this pathogen is oncogenic and an infectious cause of cancer. Providing two important wikilinks to more information on this bacteria is appropriate. Best Regards, 637: 332:
try to help you find a way to get a short scholarly note published. Never been easier with PLOS and the proliferation of niche J's. (I am envision a comment somewhere, or a reply, that incorporates your obs). RSVP, or we can go offline. Cheers. Le Prof
1459:
The study doesn't deserve it's own section. A number of other studies have also identified sulfate breathing microbes in extreme environments. I went ahead and removed the section. I inserted the study where it fits better, in a much shortened version
1605:
before discussing. Also, off topic-- I saw that you reverted my change on another article and went looking for what you meant about using secondary sources. Found the page and read it. Thanks for telling me about that because I genuinely didn't know.
1574:
Autism Speaks is widely considered to be an autism hate group by the autistic community. It is not an advocacy group. I'm going to undo the change you made and I recommend that you read about why Autism Speaks is so controversial.
998:. Please continue the discussion there. Yes, I provided only a single citation, but the general method of quantitative dot blot using the classic dot-blot apparatus is well established, and I can easily provide more references. 359:
That said, if there're substantial copyright violations in the article, tag it as G-12, and then it should be speedily deleted. Copyright infringment needs to be nuked from orbit, and the article re-created from scratch.
1414:
written, and a 3rd party source (cited in the talk page, not the main page) states they were never published. As I'm on a warning for vandalism I'd like someone to review my suggestions before I make the edit. Thanks,
375:
Well, if there are substantial amounts of copied text (or even small amounts!), that is a serious problem. Don't haraung someone over having a COI, unless their editing is otherwise problematic, but don't put up with
2073: 1985: 1895: 1531: 225:
thermal melting of a stem-containing region including the Shine-Dalgarno region, and perhaps also a downstream box segment, allows rRNA base-pairing and ribosome recruitment only at elevated (heat shock)
1382:
Dear CatPath, All the edits in the MEG section was done on behalf of Dr. David Cohen, the inventor of MEG, he shared the photos of the seminal MEG recordings and his shielded room at MIT. Thanks Sheraz
194:
While you could have added "potentially" I disagree with removing the whole paragraph so will be reinserting it. Please discuss, ideally on the article talk page, before removing large sections Thanks
2057:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1969:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1879:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1515:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1362:
paper may mention quorum sensing 13 times, but my point remains - they don't ever call the communication between the viruses quorum sensing. Nor do they present it as an example of "cooperation."
771:
doesn't claim these 21 species are "Lyme-associated." It just says there are 21 species which make host of deer ticks. Most of these 21 species don't have any proof for pathogenic potential.
2042: 1954: 1865: 1501: 884:
I had it on my watchlist, but I've been sporadic in my editing and you caught it first. Thanks and sorry for not responding quickly enough to keep you from having to deal with it.
223:
This model draws by analogy on studies that have elucidated a mechanism of bacterial heat shock preferential translation. In that instance, a series of studies have shown that
1074:
in both strains. Interestingly, the former was a slightly weaker activator than the latter. This observation can be explained by the difference between the average length of
43: 546:
punishment). Ideally, parents would know that these things happen, so they can balance cost/benefit and know what to look out for if they decide to proceed with ABA.
1750:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 1278:. It's fine to mention mixed biofilms in the lead of the article, but not to highlight one bacterium over others that are also frequently found in biofilms with 990:. As I said above, more evidence that the new method is notable is required before it deserves an article on Knowledge. I have started a Discussion on the 290: 128: 1817:
within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
297:
about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
1152:
Toll-Like Receptor 4 by Lipopolysaccharides from Pathogenic Strains of Burkholderia mallei, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa".
939:
for more information. Also, if you are one of the authors of the paper describing the new approach, you have a conflict of interest; please see
1186: 232:
But I accept that, although spelling it out, they do not use the phrase 'RNA thermometer/thermosensor', so I will not reinsert it at this time
99: 2096: 2008: 1918: 1553: 455: 132: 1809:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a
1796: 1737: 1398: 162: 673:
I am so glad that you found the (embarrassing) mistake of my listing the same reference twice but with different lead authors in the
1029: 975: 919: 182:
you state "The Shamovsky 2006 reference does not claim that RNA-1 is an RNA thermometer". In fact, the referenced article states:
293:. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out 2092: 2004: 1914: 1833: 1770: 1711: 1695:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1656: 1549: 377: 122: 186:
Here we describe a previously uncharacterised non-coding RNA that is essential for heat-shock response activation and that
190:
Indeed, the concept of an RNA thermosensor, albeit with a different mode of action, has already been described in bacteria
38: 26: 738:
For being extremely nice during a discussion about 1 of my edits that I oops! made! Thanks CatPath- for you being nice!
2066: 1978: 1888: 1524: 1205: 444: 267: 167: 2078: 1990: 1900: 1536: 674: 1098:
lipid A most of the acyl chains are C14 derivatives. Such LPS with high biological activity would be able to induce
899:
It is not fair for the scientific world to use an outdated article if only you pay attention to the article I cited.
1829: 1824: 1814: 1766: 1761: 1707: 1702: 1652: 1610: 1588: 1124:
I wonder why you removed the whole part? It is correct. You just want an extra reference? Or what is the problem?
991: 438: 431: 219:
Furthermore, the ability of ribosomal subunits to recognize this region could be heat enhanced, presumably through
764: 743: 707: 501: 1651:
What a great article! If no one picks up the GAN, I’ll try to review it soon. But seriously great work there. -
889: 271: 1337:
To our knowledge, this study is the first demonstration of actual small-molecule communication between viruses
595:, the only review source on the Bb oncogenesis discussion closes its only relevant section on the Bb-lymphoma 1781: 1722: 1667: 935:
articles in prominent journals) are needed to justify a new Knowledge article about the method. Please see
785: 481: 217:
heat-sensitive inhibitory element that impedes access to the initiation codon at normal growth temperature.
1394: 1116: 854: 147: 33: 22: 834:
was undone earlier today, so I'm here to ask your expertise in the matter and whether it belongs or not.
2054: 1966: 1876: 1806: 1751: 1621: 1606: 1584: 1512: 1419: 1348: 1324: 1180: 1025: 995: 971: 915: 656: 617: 450: 412: 337: 315: 77: 1390: 538:
I'm Luna, the person whose edit you rolled back on the ABA page. I was wondering if you could help me.
1415: 1335:. However, the paper I cited uses the term "quorum sensing" 13 times! In addition, the authors state: 1021: 967: 911: 1386: 1111: 1017: 987: 963: 936: 907: 870: 866: 768: 739: 703: 573: 558: 497: 81: 542:
scarred, and diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of their experiences in ABA.
286: 885: 839: 825: 788:
that you removed explicitly stated the number of main species which cause Lyme disease. See below:
93: 85: 1629: 1599: 1464: 1439: 1363: 1283: 1209: 999: 944: 810: 809:
There's a misunderstanding here. Moving to article's talk page to keep everything in one place.
328: 1625: 1306: 1260: 1236: 1129: 1053: 795: 477: 420: 239: 201: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 92:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 2036: 1948: 1859: 1495: 1169: 858: 306: 143: 1102:
in susceptible patients, but at the same time this type of LPS provide proper recognition by
473:
that a good route for the article would be to use the non-CV sources to develop the article.
294: 2085: 2050: 1997: 1962: 1907: 1872: 1792: 1785: 1733: 1726: 1678: 1671: 1645: 1543: 1508: 1449: 1344: 1343:
that I used to something else, and left the rest of the text (and the reference) in place.
1251: 1161: 1066: 687: 652: 613: 582: 333: 263: 65: 2065:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1977:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1887:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1523:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 986:
The QDB method should be deleted because of its lack of notability, according to Knowledge
1686: 554: 384: 364: 116: 54: 1747: 1323:
I do not understand why you completely removed the small section I added to the entries
725: 2062: 1974: 1884: 1520: 1328: 835: 636: 2058: 1970: 1880: 1516: 1302: 1256: 1232: 1125: 940: 521: 416: 353: 234: 196: 69: 601: 1820: 1757: 1698: 1682: 1114:
as compared to LPS with the low biological activity, as for example in the case of
1099: 302: 121:
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join
2027: 1939: 1851: 1487: 437:
Hello CatPath. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
1445: 1333:
the cited paper does not call the communication between viruses "quorum sensing"
1091: 683: 592: 578: 255: 215:
We suggest that one or both of these regions of secondary structure comprises a
115:
If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the
58: 107: 1075: 381: 361: 1165: 862: 1172: 441:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1677:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1014:
i would not say it if I am the only one in the world think of this way.
517: 2069:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1981:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1891:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1527:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
861:
article. I have also self-reverted an identical edit I had made to the
2046:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1958:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1869:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1505:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1071: 794:
This is very much in line with a consensus of the medical literature.--
1581:
Also I don't know how to revert your edit so I just redid mine, heh.
1250:
Hello, I noticed you removed the Staphylococcus aureus part from the
2100: 2012: 1922: 1837: 1774: 1715: 1660: 1638: 1614: 1592: 1557: 1472: 1453: 1423: 1402: 1371: 1352: 1310: 1291: 1264: 1240: 1217: 1133: 1033: 1007: 979: 952: 923: 893: 874: 843: 818: 803: 747: 711: 691: 660: 621: 586: 562: 525: 505: 485: 459: 424: 389: 369: 341: 310: 275: 242: 204: 151: 1813:
under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
1578:
Sorry if this came across as rude btw, that was not my intention.
1044:
Hello, you removed this part of the Acinetobacter baumannii wiki:
1060:
demonstrated the biological activity similar to that of classical
572:
Greetings! I noticed that you reverted some edits that I made to
401: 89: 2082:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1994:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1904:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1540:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1433:
restored that text, with some changes as you suggested. thanks,
1107: 1103: 48: 2072:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
2040:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1984:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1952:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1894:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1530:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
763:
I just wanted to comment on the recent changes you made to the
1863:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
1499:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1061: 96:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 210:
Regarding the Hsp70 element, the referenced article states:
106: 865:
article, and added a comment to that talk page as well. --
352:
situation, and you need to be carefuler. You can read the
415:
about the extensive changes you've been making? Thanks. --
55:
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles
651:
For careful expert scrutiny in your field of expertise.
2053:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1965:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1875:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1511:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1461: 1274:? Other bacteria are also found in mixed biofilms with 857:
regarding your revert of my recent contribution to the
832: 179: 1078:
in the most abundant hexa- and heptaacylated forms of
1226:
C. albicans, Removal section that was copied verbatin
1094:
and only one or two have 14 carbon atoms, whereas in
1409:
Proposed Changes on Jonathan Mitchell (writer) page
1070:, consistent with the presence of highly acylated 396:Please note my comment on the Leptospira talk page 1463:so that the study is not given excessive weight. 1246:Candida albicans -Staphylococcus aureus biofilms 213: 184: 66:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles 8: 411:Hi CatPath -- Wondering if we could talk on 291:a project to improve Knowledge's help system 880:Thanks for fixing the page on Hans Asperger 285:Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a 1846: 1482: 1384: 1015: 961: 905: 188:could potentially serve as a thermosensor. 76:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1090:lipid A, most of the acyl groups have 12 943:regarding conflict-of-interest editing. 1754:for issues which need to be addressed. 1143: 104:before the question on your talk page. 1746:. The article is close to meeting the 1570:Autism Speaks Is Not An Advocacy Group 1178: 831:Pleased to meet you. Your recent edit 44:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge 443:Too complex for speedy deletion. Try 7: 2037:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 1949:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 1860:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 1496:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 702:Ok. Then. That is fine. My mistake! 465:Sources for Water filtration article 221:thermal destabilization of the stem. 168:Template for citing medical articles 2021:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 1933:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 1843:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 1479:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 1185:: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI ( 603:, p. 846, accessed 19 June 2015.). 14: 531:About Applied Behavioral Analysis 2026: 1938: 1850: 1800: 1741: 1690: 1486: 724: 635: 2076:and submit your choices on the 1988:and submit your choices on the 1898:and submit your choices on the 1534:and submit your choices on the 34:Quick introduction to Knowledge 1473:20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC) 1454:19:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 163:Knowledge: The Missing Manual 1: 2101:00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 2055:Knowledge arbitration process 2013:01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 1967:Knowledge arbitration process 1923:00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1877:Knowledge arbitration process 1558:02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 1513:Knowledge arbitration process 844:12:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 486:18:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 460:03:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 243:08:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 205:08:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC) 1378:Magnetoencephalography (MEG) 930:The classic dot blot format 875:23:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 609:correlation is not causality 600:are probably involved" (see 568:Edit to Borrelia burgdorferi 327:No issue with the OR at Bb, 39:How to write a great article 25:to Knowledge! Thank you for 1838:00:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC) 1372:17:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 1353:13:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC) 819:18:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 804:17:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 675:Pelvic inflammatory disease 491:removing Phylogenetic trees 425:20:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 139: 2119: 2093:MediaWiki message delivery 2005:MediaWiki message delivery 1915:MediaWiki message delivery 1550:MediaWiki message delivery 1218:19:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC) 1134:15:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC) 1034:21:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 1008:21:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 980:20:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 953:19:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 924:19:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 587:20:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC) 563:15:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC) 506:17:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC) 439:Environmental microbiology 432:Environmental microbiology 430:Speedy deletion declined: 390:11:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 370:09:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC) 347:Environmental microbiology 287:Wikimedia Community Fellow 1775:08:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 1716:04:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 1685:-status according to the 1661:02:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 1639:09:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 1615:08:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 1593:06:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 1424:00:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC) 894:08:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC) 765:Lyme disease microbiology 723: 692:23:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC) 661:20:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC) 645:The Barnstar of Diligence 641: 634: 622:20:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC) 476:What's the situation? 342:04:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC) 311:17:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 300:Thank you for your time, 276:21:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 2090:to your user talk page. 2002:to your user talk page. 1912:to your user talk page. 1740:has been placed on hold 1548:to your user talk page. 1468: 1403:15:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 1367: 1311:05:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1292:18:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC) 1287: 1265:16:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC) 1213: 1166:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00595 1003: 948: 814: 748:18:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 712:18:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 526:14:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 174:Edits on RNA thermometer 152:20:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 1241:16:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC) 1154:Frontiers in immunology 1040:Acinetobacter baumannii 316:Global message delivery 1231:the C. albicans page. 1117:Pseudomonas aeruginosa 786:the source that I used 229: 192: 111: 2051:Arbitration Committee 2034:Hello! Voting in the 1963:Arbitration Committee 1946:Hello! Voting in the 1873:Arbitration Committee 1857:Hello! Voting in the 1830:Aussie Article Writer 1825:Aussie Article Writer 1819:Message delivered by 1807:Talk:Esther Lederberg 1767:Aussie Article Writer 1762:Aussie Article Writer 1756:Message delivered by 1752:Talk:Esther Lederberg 1748:good article criteria 1708:Aussie Article Writer 1703:Aussie Article Writer 1697:Message delivered by 1653:Aussie Article Writer 1509:Arbitration Committee 1493:Hello! Voting in the 1325:microbial cooperation 1319:Microbial cooperation 996:Quantitative dot blot 732:The Civility Barnstar 445:WP:Copyright problems 413:Talk:Esther Lederberg 323:Cat, just checking in 281:Knowledge Help Survey 110: 1112:innate immune system 1082:lipid A compared to 574:Borrelia burgdorferi 378:copyright violations 124:WikiProject Medicine 21:Hello, CatPath, and 1795:you nominated as a 1736:you nominated as a 1358:The authors of the 1204:I responded on the 826:History of syphilis 784:Also, I gotta say, 769:reference you cited 717:A barnstar for you! 698:Cat path-The revert 553:Thanks a lot, Luna 94:Knowledge:Questions 70:general style guide 2067:arbitration policy 1979:arbitration policy 1889:arbitration policy 1681:you nominated for 1525:arbitration policy 1054:Lipopolysaccharide 628:A Barnstar for you 157:More helpful links 112: 27:your contributions 2103: 2015: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1827: 1764: 1705: 1564: 1563: 1437: 1405: 1389:comment added by 1331:. You wrote that 1208:of the article. 1036: 1020:comment added by 982: 966:comment added by 926: 910:comment added by 859:Pertussis vaccine 853:I have started a 753: 752: 666: 665: 319: 314:(Delivered using 295:this brief survey 180:this edit summary 142:Again, welcome! 84:your messages on 2110: 2091: 2089: 2030: 2003: 2001: 1942: 1913: 1911: 1854: 1847: 1818: 1804: 1803: 1793:Esther Lederberg 1786:Esther Lederberg 1755: 1745: 1744: 1734:Esther Lederberg 1727:Esther Lederberg 1696: 1694: 1693: 1679:Esther Lederberg 1672:Esther Lederberg 1646:Esther Lederberg 1634: 1622:Queenofconfusion 1607:Queenofconfusion 1603: 1585:Queenofconfusion 1547: 1490: 1483: 1443: 1435: 1252:Candida albicans 1191: 1190: 1184: 1176: 1148: 1110:complex of host 1067:Escherichia coli 994:of the article 849:"Leaky" vaccines 801: 798: 756:Lyme Borreliosis 728: 721: 720: 690: 639: 632: 631: 585: 407:Esther Lederberg 387: 367: 313: 260: 237: 199: 103: 86:discussion pages 46:, an essay from 2118: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2083: 2031: 2023: 2018: 2017: 1995: 1943: 1935: 1905: 1845: 1823:, on behalf of 1801: 1789: 1760:, on behalf of 1742: 1730: 1701:, on behalf of 1691: 1675: 1649: 1630: 1597: 1572: 1541: 1481: 1434: 1431: 1411: 1380: 1321: 1248: 1228: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1177: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1050: 1042: 901: 882: 851: 829: 799: 796: 758: 740:SwagBucks101101 719: 704:SwagBucks101101 700: 688:leave a message 682: 671: 630: 583:leave a message 577: 570: 533: 513: 498:Videsh Ramsahai 493: 467: 458: 435: 409: 398: 385: 365: 349: 325: 283: 256: 251: 235: 197: 176: 159: 117:Medicine Portal 97: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2116: 2114: 2074:the candidates 2043:eligible users 2032: 2025: 2024: 2022: 2019: 1986:the candidates 1955:eligible users 1944: 1937: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1896:the candidates 1866:eligible users 1855: 1844: 1841: 1788: 1784:nomination of 1778: 1729: 1725:nomination of 1719: 1674: 1670:nomination of 1664: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1532:the candidates 1502:eligible users 1491: 1480: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1430: 1427: 1410: 1407: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1341:quorum sensing 1329:quorum sensing 1320: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1295: 1294: 1270:Why emphasize 1247: 1244: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1198: 1193: 1192: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1123: 1056:isolated from 1049: 1046: 1041: 1038: 1011: 1010: 958: 956: 955: 900: 897: 886:TheDracologist 881: 878: 850: 847: 828: 823: 822: 821: 757: 754: 751: 750: 735: 734: 729: 718: 715: 699: 696: 695: 694: 670: 667: 664: 663: 648: 647: 642: 640: 629: 626: 625: 624: 604: 569: 566: 532: 529: 512: 509: 492: 489: 466: 463: 454: 449:Thank you. — 434: 428: 408: 405: 397: 394: 393: 392: 348: 345: 324: 321: 301: 282: 279: 254:population."-- 250: 247: 246: 245: 230: 211: 175: 172: 171: 170: 165: 158: 155: 120: 74: 73: 62: 59:general advice 52: 41: 36: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2115: 2104: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2087: 2081: 2080: 2075: 2070: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2047: 2045: 2044: 2039: 2038: 2029: 2020: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2006: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1987: 1982: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1957: 1956: 1951: 1950: 1941: 1932: 1926: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1868: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1856: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1842: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1822: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1798: 1794: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1763: 1759: 1753: 1749: 1739: 1735: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1700: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1635: 1633: 1627: 1626:Autism Speaks 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1601: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1569: 1567: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1545: 1539: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1504: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1492: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1441: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1408: 1406: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1318: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1245: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1225: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1188: 1182: 1174: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1048:LPS structure 1047: 1045: 1039: 1037: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 937:WP:Notability 933: 929: 928: 927: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 898: 896: 895: 891: 887: 879: 877: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 848: 846: 845: 841: 837: 833: 827: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 807: 806: 805: 802: 792: 789: 787: 782: 778: 775: 772: 770: 767:article. The 766: 761: 755: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 733: 730: 727: 722: 716: 714: 713: 709: 705: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680: 679: 676: 668: 662: 658: 654: 650: 649: 646: 643: 638: 633: 627: 623: 619: 615: 611: 610: 606:Bottom line, 605: 602: 598: 594: 591: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 575: 567: 565: 564: 560: 556: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536: 530: 528: 527: 523: 519: 510: 508: 507: 503: 499: 490: 488: 487: 483: 479: 478:Chiswick Chap 474: 470: 464: 462: 461: 457: 452: 451:Malik Shabazz 448: 446: 440: 433: 429: 427: 426: 422: 418: 414: 406: 404: 403: 395: 391: 388: 383: 379: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 363: 357: 355: 346: 344: 343: 339: 335: 330: 322: 320: 317: 312: 308: 304: 298: 296: 292: 288: 280: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 259: 248: 244: 241: 240: 238: 231: 228: 227: 222: 218: 212: 209: 208: 207: 206: 203: 202: 200: 191: 189: 183: 181: 173: 169: 166: 164: 161: 160: 156: 154: 153: 149: 145: 140: 137: 136: 134: 131:or say hello 130: 126: 125: 118: 109: 105: 101: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 71: 67: 63: 60: 56: 53: 51: 50: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 16: 2077: 2071: 2048: 2041: 2035: 2033: 1989: 1983: 1960: 1953: 1947: 1945: 1899: 1893: 1870: 1864: 1858: 1810: 1797:good article 1791:The article 1790: 1738:good article 1732:The article 1731: 1676: 1650: 1636: 1631: 1596: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1565: 1535: 1529: 1506: 1500: 1494: 1432: 1429:note re text 1412: 1391:Sherrykhan78 1385:— Preceding 1381: 1359: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1322: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1249: 1229: 1197: 1181:cite journal 1157: 1153: 1146: 1138: 1122: 1115: 1100:septic shock 1095: 1092:carbon atoms 1088:A. baumannii 1087: 1086:lipid A. In 1083: 1080:A. baumannii 1079: 1065: 1058:A. baumannii 1057: 1051: 1043: 1016:— Preceding 1012: 962:— Preceding 957: 931: 906:— Preceding 902: 883: 852: 830: 793: 790: 783: 779: 776: 773: 762: 760:Hi CatPath, 759: 731: 701: 672: 644: 608: 607: 596: 571: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 534: 514: 494: 475: 471: 468: 442: 436: 410: 400:See comment 399: 358: 350: 329:User:CatPath 326: 299: 284: 257: 252: 233: 226:temperatures 224: 220: 216: 214: 195: 193: 187: 185: 177: 144:WhatamIdoing 141: 138: 123: 114: 113: 75: 64:Knowledge's 47: 20: 2079:voting page 1991:voting page 1901:voting page 1815:nominate it 1799:has passed 1537:voting page 1416:Mattevansc3 1345:PloniAlmoni 1280:C. albicans 1276:C. albicans 1076:acyl groups 1022:Jiandizhang 968:Jiandizhang 912:Jiandizhang 774:See below: 653:Leprof 7272 614:Leprof 7272 597:association 593:User:Bfpage 334:Leprof 7272 289:working on 88:using four 2063:topic bans 1975:topic bans 1885:topic bans 1521:topic bans 1139:References 988:guidelines 867:Outdowands 855:discussion 797:Shibboleth 555:MissLuna12 535:Hi there, 511:Lac operon 354:whole mess 78:Wikipedian 2059:site bans 1971:site bans 1881:site bans 1811:bold link 1517:site bans 1272:S. aureus 1206:Talk page 992:Talk page 863:Pertussis 836:Etsybetsy 669:Thank you 469:CatPath, 258:Doc James 127:(sign up 80:! Please 1687:criteria 1399:contribs 1387:unsigned 1303:Garnhami 1257:Garnhami 1233:Garnhami 1173:26635809 1126:Garnhami 1030:contribs 1018:unsigned 976:contribs 964:unsigned 920:contribs 908:unsigned 550:happen? 447:instead. 417:Lquilter 268:contribs 236:Jebus989 198:Jebus989 17:Welcome! 2086:NoACEMM 1998:NoACEMM 1908:NoACEMM 1821:Legobot 1758:Legobot 1699:Legobot 1632:CatPath 1600:CatPath 1544:NoACEMM 1465:CatPath 1440:CatPath 1438:editor 1364:CatPath 1284:CatPath 1210:CatPath 1160:: 595. 1096:E. coli 1084:E. coli 1072:lipid A 1000:CatPath 945:CatPath 811:CatPath 303:the wub 23:welcome 1805:; see 1628:page. 1446:Sm8900 1360:Nature 941:WP:COI 684:Bfpage 579:Bfpage 100:helpme 90:tildes 1780:Your 1721:Your 1666:Your 1064:from 456:Stalk 272:email 2097:talk 2049:The 2009:talk 1961:The 1919:talk 1871:The 1834:talk 1771:talk 1712:talk 1657:talk 1611:talk 1589:talk 1554:talk 1507:The 1469:talk 1450:talk 1444:. -- 1420:talk 1395:talk 1368:talk 1349:talk 1327:and 1307:talk 1288:talk 1261:talk 1237:talk 1214:talk 1187:link 1170:PMID 1130:talk 1108:MD-2 1104:TLR4 1026:talk 1004:talk 972:talk 949:talk 916:talk 890:talk 871:talk 840:talk 815:talk 744:talk 708:talk 657:talk 618:talk 559:talk 522:talk 502:talk 482:talk 421:talk 402:here 382:Wily 362:Wily 338:talk 307:talk 264:talk 148:talk 133:here 129:here 82:sign 49:PLoS 1828:-- 1765:-- 1706:-- 1620:Hi 1282:. 1162:doi 1120:. 1062:LPS 1052:− 800:ink 518:Hzh 178:In 2099:) 2088:}} 2084:{{ 2061:, 2011:) 2000:}} 1996:{{ 1973:, 1921:) 1910:}} 1906:{{ 1883:, 1836:) 1782:GA 1773:) 1723:GA 1714:) 1689:. 1683:GA 1668:GA 1659:) 1613:) 1591:) 1556:) 1546:}} 1542:{{ 1519:, 1471:) 1452:) 1436:To 1422:) 1401:) 1397:• 1370:) 1351:) 1309:) 1290:) 1263:) 1239:) 1216:) 1183:}} 1179:{{ 1168:. 1156:. 1132:) 1032:) 1028:• 1006:) 978:) 974:• 951:) 932:is 922:) 918:• 892:) 873:) 842:) 817:) 746:) 710:) 659:) 620:) 561:) 524:) 504:) 484:) 423:) 380:. 340:) 309:) 274:) 270:· 266:· 249:TB 150:) 135:). 102:}} 98:{{ 2095:( 2007:( 1917:( 1832:( 1769:( 1710:( 1655:( 1609:( 1602:: 1598:@ 1587:( 1552:( 1467:( 1448:( 1442:: 1418:( 1393:( 1366:( 1347:( 1305:( 1286:( 1259:( 1235:( 1212:( 1189:) 1175:. 1164:: 1158:6 1128:( 1106:/ 1024:( 1002:( 970:( 947:( 914:( 888:( 869:( 838:( 813:( 742:( 706:( 686:| 655:( 616:( 581:| 557:( 520:( 500:( 480:( 453:/ 419:( 386:D 366:D 336:( 318:) 305:( 262:( 146:( 119:. 72:) 68:( 61:) 57:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
Quick introduction to Knowledge
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
PLoS
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles
general advice
Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
general style guide
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
helpme

Medicine Portal
WikiProject Medicine
here
here
WhatamIdoing
talk
20:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Knowledge: The Missing Manual
Template for citing medical articles
this edit summary
Jebus989

08:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.