366:
first. As for the catalog numbers, I don't know what to do in that regard. It's obvious there needs to be some heavy trimming, but I am unclear how to proceed. My first thought is to simply include the
British release dates and catalog numbers for the albums since the primary members are British. Let me know what you think and we can work from there. Thanks,
374:
I think using the UK Label for the infobox is a good idea. This is their home label (The
Parlophone logo even appears on the Japanese release) and the UK release date was also the international release date. As for the catalog numbers, I proposed a table in a seperate section at the bottom of the
365:
I am beginning to agree with you that overfilling the
Infoboxes with Catalog numbers and release dates is perhaps overwhelming to the casual reader. I realize this is a complete reversal of what my position was. In any case, perhaps we can come to an agreement as which release date to consider as
638:
I'm somewhat (well, relatively) new to
Knowledge (XXG) and it seems to me that one of its virtues is that nobody's preference as to the content of an article stands higher than anyone else's. (From a statistical standpoint, I guess it adds to the accuracy of the information.) That said, who
336:
I was looking at the history for
Radiohead albums I editted yesterday, are those 4th, 5th, 6th really needed? Most other artists' albums do not have those. And also the before the album numbers are easier to read than just continuously writing it... At least I thought so. thanks, --
484:
I'm also glad we could settle this and I think you're really doing a great job on all the
Gorillaz pages! And it's great you created all the seperate articles for all the singles, well done. There were some very minor things I'd change (I did so in the article for
614:
I don't know if it's you, but by reformating "track listing" and adding == == on either side, we're having lines crossing through the info boxes and album artwork. Putting three === on either side seems to rectify this. Thanks.
379:. This would have the advantage that we could include a lot of different catalog numbers (thus not being favorable towards one label) while keeping the infobox itself clean and simple. Maybe something like this:
622:
Hey again... I just realized it's not any of us. This is happening all over the place on this site. Must have something to do with the re-load/update a few days ago. Hopefully it gets sorted out soon.
513:
279:
I'd recommend that you do some reading up on the issue. I've tried to make it as simple as possible, but it is a complicated issue. Take your time and get back to me when you know more.
493:
is written without italics in it's article, so I think we shouldn't put it in italics in the review sections. Again, thanks for your cooperation and your great work on these articles! --
544:
Thanks for all the work on
Coldplay, whether it's the infoboxes, or CD numbers, or the new Coldplay box... Did you do the Radiohead one as well, cuz it has the same template...
168:
516:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —
489:", let me know if they're okay... then I'll change them for all the articles) for example, I moved the catalog numbers from the infobox to the track listing. And
317:
Hopefully the current version of that template will avoid any more of this silliness. If any changes I make are for the worse, complaints are more than welcome!
306:
Well, I don't think it's helpful when it takes up the entire screen. And even the others take up a little more than half the screen. That's just too much space.
201:
115:
I don't see a particular need for a separate category for the covers. Would it be OK with you if I remove the covers from the separate covers category? --
679:
page. What are your opinions on this? Personally I think it looks crap but I'd like to know what you think before I go and revert the changes. --
643:
infobox is "standard"? Would it be the writer of the article, or... just you? I'd be very grateful if you could shed any light on this matter!
568:
Sorry about the block - that revert war was out of control. I don't like blocking the page - I am hoping that Mike and the anon can at least
376:
547:
How do you edit/create the
Coldplay box at the bottom of the page? I want to edit one of those boxes for another series of pages for
688:
Thanks for your input. I posted a comment on the talk page and I'm awaiting any replies before I decide whether or not to revert. --
135:
all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the
652:
509:
185:
132:
100:
655:
for information regarding Single infoboxes. If this does not prove to be enough information for you, please view
104:
644:
171:
Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at
144:
710:
albums but for some reason I never got round to it. I might still have a go at finishing off the remaining
676:
656:
112:
295:
494:
475:
462:
108:
37:
58:
196:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
50:
33:
601:
If there's a precedent of them being used elsewhere with no problem, then I guess it's cool. :-) --
71:
706:
albums which you've written articles for. I was going to start on them after I'd finished off the
470:
322:
175:
those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More
Information:
155:
license is a true free documentation license that is similar to
Knowledge (XXG)'s license, the
354:
338:
269:
256:
179:
17:
549:
136:
580:
Thanks for the feedback - it's my first page protection, so I'm rather insecure about it.
213:
I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
715:
689:
680:
602:
594:
557:
531:
490:
116:
711:
640:
624:
616:
581:
573:
307:
299:
231:
I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:
530:
It's a good picture, but why don't you wait untill the merge controversy is finished.
318:
148:
593:
A bit OTT, perhaps? Are they even being used for any non-Coldplay band articles? --
660:
517:
367:
283:
280:
261:
87:
62:
675:
I've noticed that someone has recently made a drastic change to the layout of the
294:
Can't you shrink the width of those album infoboxes a bit? Especially the one on
718:
707:
703:
692:
683:
534:
520:
190:
128:
41:
238:
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "
164:
75:
54:
204:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
83:
79:
486:
350:
298:; on my computer the infobox is taking up nearly the entire screen.
260:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. --
247:
200:" template into their user page, but there are other options at
156:
265:
504:
U2allthatyoucantleavebehindcover.jpg listed for deletion
74:
to make 10 edits on a variety of articles dating from
508:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
474:
and yours looks way better than mine. Good work! --
107:. The {{albumcover}} template adds the image to
167:, to use our articles. Since you are among the
514:Knowledge (XXG):Images and media for deletion
8:
99:Hi - I'm cleaning up categories listed in
36:that had editted for the most part the
7:
659:as well. Thanks, and happy editing.
510:U2allthatyoucantleavebehindcover.jpg
468:Just saw the release box you did on
250:, I would like to know that too.
24:
377:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums
246:". If you only prefer using the
95:categories for Oasis album covers
202:Template messages/User namespace
191:Free the Rambot Articles Project
349:Thanks for fixing the Coldplay
240:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
234:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
216:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
198:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
1:
353:infobox. I made a mistake.
521:18:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
286:] 23:36, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
182:- Lots of questions answered
101:category:orphaned categories
111:. Since the albums are in
105:category:Oasis album covers
734:
651:Please, feel free to view
597:June 30, 2005 06:01 (UTC)
139:Attribution-Share Alike (
719:17:32, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
693:20:05, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
684:12:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
627:30 June 2005 22:05 (UTC)
619:30 June 2005 20:11 (UTC)
605:June 30, 2005 16:22 (UTC)
576:00:03, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
560:05:55, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
497:July 3, 2005 11:12 (UTC)
465:July 2, 2005 09:19 (UTC)
361:Gorillaz albums infoboxes
357:02:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
341:23:46, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
302:23:15, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
119:17:16, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
647:4 July 2005 06:53 (UTC)
584:00:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
478:July 2, 2005 09:27 (UTC)
370:1 July 2005 19:37 (UTC)
325:01:06, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
310:23:25, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
90:17:30, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
65:21:40, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
677:John Lennon discography
671:John Lennon Discography
663:4 July 2005 07:05 (UTC)
639:arbitrates which style
535:19:05, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
296:COM LAG (2plus2isfive)
714:catalogue though. --
512:, has been listed at
254:what you think at my
186:Multi-Licensing Guide
151:if they prefer. The
113:category:Oasis albums
109:category:album covers
38:Timeline of Star Trek
103:and I've run across
702:Well done with the
610:Track listing lines
180:Multi-Licensing FAQ
698:Ringo Starr albums
471:Let It Be... Naked
275:Licensing question
252:Please let me know
244:{{MultiLicensePD}}
27:Other IP addresses
634:Single Info Boxes
456:
455:
123:Article Licensing
59:Starship Yorktown
18:User talk:Cbing01
725:
550:The Amazing Race
385:
384:
332:Radiohead albums
159:, but it allows
143:) v1.0 and v2.0
137:Creative Commons
131:to get users to
82:including all 3
70:Used IP address
733:
732:
728:
727:
726:
724:
723:
722:
700:
673:
636:
612:
591:
566:
542:
528:
506:
491:All Music Guide
363:
347:
345:Coldplay albums
334:
292:
290:Album infoboxes
277:
129:started a drive
125:
97:
86:studio albums.
51:129.118.120.128
34:205.161.132.191
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
731:
729:
712:Paul McCartney
699:
696:
672:
669:
667:
665:
664:
645:24.163.126.109
635:
632:
630:
611:
608:
607:
606:
590:
587:
586:
585:
565:
562:
541:
538:
527:
524:
505:
502:
500:
482:
481:
480:
479:
458:
457:
454:
453:
449:
448:
445:
442:
439:
435:
434:
431:
428:
425:
421:
420:
417:
414:
411:
407:
406:
404:Catalog number
401:
396:
391:
381:
380:
362:
359:
346:
343:
333:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
312:
311:
291:
288:
276:
273:
236:
235:
232:
229:
218:
217:
214:
211:
194:
193:
188:
183:
161:other projects
124:
121:
96:
93:
92:
91:
67:
66:
46:
45:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
730:
721:
720:
717:
713:
709:
705:
697:
695:
694:
691:
686:
685:
682:
678:
670:
668:
662:
658:
657:this template
654:
650:
649:
648:
646:
642:
633:
631:
628:
626:
620:
618:
609:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
588:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
571:
563:
561:
559:
554:
552:
551:
545:
539:
537:
536:
533:
526:ESB DVD image
525:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
503:
501:
498:
496:
492:
488:
477:
473:
472:
467:
466:
464:
460:
459:
451:
450:
446:
443:
440:
437:
436:
432:
429:
426:
423:
422:
418:
415:
412:
409:
408:
405:
402:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
387:
386:
383:
382:
378:
373:
372:
371:
369:
360:
358:
356:
352:
344:
342:
340:
331:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
304:
303:
301:
297:
289:
287:
285:
281:
274:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
205:
203:
199:
192:
189:
187:
184:
181:
178:
177:
176:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:public domain
146:
142:
138:
134:
133:multi-license
130:
122:
120:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:65.182.76.130
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
30:
26:
19:
701:
687:
674:
666:
637:
629:
621:
613:
592:
569:
567:
555:
548:
546:
543:
529:
507:
499:
483:
469:
403:
398:
393:
388:
364:
355:Irdepesca572
348:
335:
293:
278:
255:
251:
243:
239:
237:
226:
220:
219:
208:
197:
195:
172:
160:
152:
147:or into the
140:
126:
98:
708:John Lennon
704:Ringo Starr
419:TOCP 66380
413:Toshiba-EMI
375:article on
88:PlasticBeat
63:PlasticBeat
42:USS Defiant
716:DaveGorman
690:DaveGorman
681:DaveGorman
603:Madchester
595:Madchester
572:talking.
558:Madchester
532:Ace-o-aces
441:Parlophone
427:Parlophone
165:WikiTravel
163:, such as
117:Rick Block
76:January 21
653:this page
625:PetSounds
617:PetSounds
582:Guettarda
574:Guettarda
564:Mesmerize
308:Everyking
300:Everyking
257:talk page
127:Hi, I've
32:Formerly
540:Coldplay
495:Fritz S.
476:Fritz S.
463:Fritz S.
447:8738382
433:8738381
389:Location
319:iMeowbot
242:" with "
227:Option 2
209:Option 1
169:top 2000
153:CC-by-sa
145:Licenses
141:CC-by-sa
84:Coldplay
80:March 29
53:to edit
40:and the
661:Cbing01
518:MetsBot
487:19/2000
368:Cbing01
351:X&Y
284:Ram-Man
266:comment
262:Ram-Man
173:minimum
641:single
589:Stars?
399:Format
570:start
553:....
410:Japan
394:Label
270:talk)
49:Used
16:<
452:...
248:GFDL
157:GFDL
57:and
78:to
55:Air
556:--
461:--
444:CD
438:UK
430:LP
424:UK
416:CD
339:WB
323:Mw
282:–
268:|
221:OR
61:.
485:"
321:~
264:(
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.