User talk:KellyAna - Knowledge (XXG)

200:). So I recommend that you be scrupulous about keeping the summaries limited to the content, and don't refer to other users at all. You're doing a good job reverting bona fide vandalism, but be careful to only use the word "vandalism" in an edit summary if you're reverting something really blatant (like the editor that changed "son" to "daughter"). That's definitely vandalism. However other edits, where people seem to be making good faith changes that are just wrong, it's not okay to refer to them as vandalism. A revert may still be appropriate, but it would be better to use some other edit summary such as "reverting unsourced material" or "fixing", or when in doubt, the nice neutral "copyediting" is always safe. :) Just giving you a heads-up, -- 910:

their work but I cannot revert removal of mass amounts of verified content. I, further, don't appreciate the false accusations of a "need to step away" as I was only doing what I've done for months and NEVER been warned about. I was not even afforded a cursory "this might not be the way to do something" even though I believe what I did was correct and did not violate civility. The revert of removal of mass content has always been reverting vandalism, since when is it not. The editor removed content claiming it as his own, that's not allowed.

922:

is handling this is vindicating many of us who supported her RfA a few months ago. Reading her explanation below, especially the bit about the harassing emails, really makes me sad. Kelly, don't do this. If you have a roaring sinus infection it might be a good idea to just sit back and do something else until you feel better, even after the block expires, as it and the medication cannot be helping your mood. Harassing emails is serious business ... this gets people

1545: 1404: 747: 2575: 2464: 2353: 2203: 2100: 1468:, I deleted it, and you then reacted by posting it again here at your own talkpage. Both versions have been deleted, and removed from page history. As Daniel Case is an administrator, he will be able to look into the history and still see it. I am also willing to forward any emails that I have received from you or any other accounts associated with yours, to any admins that wish to view them for themselves. 55: 1935: 1874: 1813: 1752: 1649: 824: 2311: 2032: 1497: 216:

effecting moods, yada yada yada.... I guess it makes sense in a way, I have been in a lot of pain but I thought it was because the world bloomed all at once without warning and then we had close to a week of rain. I don't know anymore, I just want the pain to stop and the moods to go back to normal because this isn't working.

1323:

Thanks. I dont want you falsely accused, that's not right. What's so funny is DJS and Blackwatch are so socks but I've never reported them. I don't have the time to play that game but he apparently does. We've always edited the same pages, she watches my as because I'm a bitch but we were cleared

921:

I do this with a somewhat heavy heart. Under her former username, I had helped her out a lot in her early days here and it was quite fulfilling to watch someone you'd mentored a little grow and develop. I was stunned by the first block, but I have long trusted Elonka and I should say that the way she

909:

Please, seriously, explain what personal attacks I made. Someone claiming to remove content that they own which you cannot own date information? How is that not vandalism? I feel that what I did was in good faith and not personal attacks. Seems as though others can call things vandalism or call dates

809:

on the editor's page isn't maintaining civility; you've been specifically asked before to stop referring to contributions you don't like as vandalism. I have blocked your account for 24 hours. When you return, please remember that you can always step away from Knowledge (XXG) for a bit if you don't

307:

This is getting WAY TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH. I was nice. I didn't snark. You are "holding me to too high a standard" and by your standards I'll never cut it. I'm going to go cry myself to sleep because I can't, I just can't live up to your new found standards. I was not impolite. I WASN'T. Why

222:

I am sorry for what I said to you. The infection is no excuse, we should control our bodies, not our bodies control us. The head pain (my face hurts if I bite down with my front teeth), the wrong medicine, the lack of ability to breath are factors but they aren't an excuse for how I treated you. I

175:

I'm glad that you're getting to the bottom of things. I have suffered from sinus infections myself and I know that they're no fun! Do you trust the doctor? I had to go through 3 or 4 doctors before I found one who I really felt was understanding things, and then once I found a good one, I've stuck

160:

As well as can be expected. LOL. Good, or maybe bad, news is I went to the doctor today and found out why the mood swings and really really bad moods. I don't have allergies, I have a roaring sinus infection. Not making excuses, I did what I did, but at least I got an answer to why. How's life

1292:

when someone who I have had minimal contact with can't even offer a comment ON MY TALK PAGE without being attacked, he didn't even comment on the sock puppet stuff. That's not right and not fair. I'm used to Irish and I being accused but to accuse Rm just because he's got a random edit to a Days

1260:

article so I know I can't stay to just the two pages. Okay, so removing that Billie raped Bo might not be vandalism to you, but it is to me and it shouldn't be removed because she did rape him. Besides, Daniel is right and I hate that I disappointed him. I mean, I really hate it. He's a really

1240:

KellyAna, you are allowed to defend yourself. If you are able to promise that you will present your comments in a civil way, I would be willing to unblock you, with the understanding that for the next 48 hours (or whatever remains of the block) that you will limit yourself to posting only at the

1194:

For what it's worth, I don't think you're the same person. Irishlass updated the Gina Von Amberg article months ago...you made the spelling change a few days ago. If you were her, why didn't you make the change then? I may not agree with everything other editors say and do, but I will stick up for

1087:

Listen, I'm okay with the 24 hour block. That's fine. I said it, I did it, I was the bitch that I am (although I didn't mean to violate policy, but it is how it is). What I'm really pissed about is I didn't "abuse the Knowledge (XXG) email system." Jason's email is available on his site and it

247:

I knew I'd misclicked and reverted your edits to the 3RR noticeboard, but I originally thought I must have accidentally hit the rollback button. I just noticed that it was actually twinkle's vandalism button, so I wanted to apologize for the edit summary even though I'd rolled myself back within a

1116:

Leave it for 48. I just read Daniel's comments and just cried. He is so sweet and always has been. He's right, I need the break and a block is just how it needs to be done. Or maybe unblock and see if I can control. Irregardless, I'm okay with it staying. I can piss off a lot of people but

637:

I disagree, I believe she is notable. The character has been involved in story lines which could be considered central to the show, e.g. Campus Rapist, Ford Decker death, ... I will reinstate the page and add a notability tag, if other people questions her notability I will delete the page. Reid

341:

I have no sense of humor, I hate April Fools and got a man fired for pulling an April Fools joke. I was nice to the best of my ability based on what you said to tell him, you need to stop holding me to some ridiculously impossible standard that I will never live up to. You should have done it

660:

Well, several others with more experience than you or I decided the page should be redirected to the main Days page. If you reinstate a deleted page, you will be flagged. Her page has already been deleted. Adding back a deleted page is a violation of Knowledge (XXG) policy. Consider this a

1308:

KellyAna, I think I took care of it. Not that it actually bothers me really. I sort of think its funny. Not sure what he's thinking, but as you are well aware, I am not a sock, nor are we the same person :). I would like to be involed with the Days of Our Lives cast page if at all possible. I

1043:

I asked him to forward the email to me, and I can confirm that it is from the same Yahoo address which KellyAna previously used to write harassing emails to me, and that it has the same communication style. Along with extending the block, I am also disabling email for this account. If any

215:

To be honest, it's too soon to tell about the doctor. Knowing that Claritan isn't going to help an infection did make sense and the "mood swing" comment didn't until I looked it up. He explained the combination of an infection with the wrong medicine and the proximity to the brain and pain

185:

BTW, one other small piece of "course correction" advice. Please be very careful with what you put into edit summaries. Sometimes they can get you into even more trouble than actual comments, because they show up more quickly if someone is doing a quick scan of your contribs:

326:. Just thought I'd drop you a reminder about it. I look forward to reading more about you, the editor, when you update it!" (note: This doesn't mean I want you to copy/paste, I'm just suggesting a different kind of tone. But you gotta write whatever feels sincere to you) -- 1018:

I actually think that a 24-hour block is quite lenient at this point. If KellyAna wants to continue participating on Knowledge (XXG), she needs to abide by policies, and she needs to show that she can work in a cooperative and collegial manner with other editors.

445:

Minor characters with little to no notability have no place in an encyclopedia. These pages were previously merged or deleted and do not belong on Knowledge (XXG). This is not a fan site, it is an encyclopedia. When notability is not there, pages get removed.

1380:

DJS24 filed against you. The checkuser found that you and IrishLass0128 are editing from the same area. An explanation about your off-site relationship with IrishLass0128 is needed in addition to why the two of you have never edited at the same time.

107:

I don't know how to reply on "my page." I am sorry for my comment and question on the EJ Wells talk page that were so inappropriate that they had to be immediately deleted. Your time is valuable and I should mind my own business and not bother you.

1474:

It appears that based on discussions at the SSP page, your block has now been extended to indefinite. Please find something else to do on the internet. We are trying to build an encyclopedia here, and your assistance is no longer desired.

1309:

remember lots of past stars that aren't on the list and would like to contribute. Yes, I have communicated with IrishLass, when I was new to editing. I was so mean to her. I felt like an idiot after she explained the rules. Feel better :)

1526: 1377: 1139:

Is it allowable to link a video or upload pictures to prove identity? I took them, or was in the picture. It's visual proof of who I am and who Irish is and why we talk to each other off of Wiki through our other site.

1088:

has been since we first tussled nearly 2 years ago on NBC. Quite honestly, since I've seen the SSP, I don't think unblocking me is a good idea because I'll likely tell DJS, a one time confirmed sock puppeteer himself

1102:), where to "stick it." I know when I "need a time out" and with as pissed as I am, a time out until tomorrow morning is probably a good idea. Leave it for 24, I'm pissed and a bitch right now, leaving it is best. 1604:

She was actually telling the truth and the reason that i know this is because she's my cousin and she's doesn't lie to anyone. You probaruly had issues with her in the past but she doesn't like being called a lier.

1155:

Sure, you can upload a reasonable amount of fair use images. But better would be if you could come up with a plausible explanation for why you use a similar writing style, and you're never online at the same time.

223:

make no excuses, I should have walked away rather than been such a bitch. I'm sorry. Please accept my apology. I can't guarantee I won't do it again, that would be a lie, but I can say I'll try not to.

2325: 575:

I have no idea. I didn't really pay so much attention to the content but to the fact that RionDC was doing things he shouldn't have been doing. I'll take a look and see if I can spot any similiarities.

1256:

Thank you but I don't want that. I want to honestly serve my time. If I don't just because someone accused me of being a sock it's not right. It's killing me, I've already seen vandalism to the

2054: 2046:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 1261:

good guy and that just cuts that I disappointed him. I know DJS is just being vindictive and I'll prove him wrong but I'll do it when I'm allowed to edit, not under special circumstances.

1967:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1906:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1845:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1784:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1681:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1577:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 322:

If I would have done it, I would have posted something like, "Hah, cute April Fools joke on your userpage. Too bad you can't keep it there for awhile, but it does kind of run afoul of

2053:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1067:

I have unprotected the page since someone wanted to post an SSP report here. KellyAna, you are allowed to post here again, but please make sure all comments are in compliance with

264:

You're all good. Thanks for taking the time to apologize, that's really nice. A lot of people wouldn't do that. I appreciate that you did. Have a good night and thanks again.

1214:

As I am not allowed to defend myself against DJS's accusations, why is a video of the two of us so offensive? No, Ali didn't call us by our names because until we met her here,

1963:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1902:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1841:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1780:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1677:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1573:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1071:. I may also be willing to lift the block, so that you can post at the SSP page, but I would need assurances from you that you would be able to moderate your behavior. -- 1458:

KellyAna, it appears rather than taking advantage of your unblocked state to go back to editing articles, you instead used it to post uncivil comments at the SSP report,

1370: 477:

Yes please. He's being uncivil and removing valid content along with creating unnecessary previously merged or deleted pages AND I am 99% sure he's a sock. Thank you.

2602:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2491:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2380:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2230:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2127:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

975: 1956: