612:
consider I was not vandalizing any part of the article at all. Before you refer it to talk page, you've got to cultivate your attitude. Even long-experienced medical doctors tend to make big blunders. As for the treatment of PXE, you kept insisting on laser therapy only. Perhaps you might be funded by some corporations to carry their corporate spin. Once again, this
Knowledge article is not a sort of academic dissertation, either. Knowledge should offer knowledges as they are available now, but not the way you want them to be. One more thing, the next time you put your opinion here, you will need to draw a line between your point and mine 'cause other editors are also watching so they won't be confused.
759:
187:
44:
402:
article. I suspect that the user might want to justify why this article is a piece of advertisemt. Any wikipedia article should not be perfect in its true sense, and if other editors might need to cooperate to make a wikipedia rticle perfect, which is a basic wiki sstandard and quality. Does that use have a sort of hidden cultural valndalism or what? Come out and tell me specifically what is the point?
335:
611:
Whatever you say is not acceptable by Wiki editing standard, of which the basic principle calls for being edited by anybody. I am anybody and you are,too. The first time I had edited the PXE article, you erased it when I was in the middle of writing it. That is not the right attitude at all, when you
401:
The reason why this article should not be deleted has repeatedly been mentioned, saying it is a far cry from being one specific company's advertisement. A user with a biased view might ask for speedy deletion. Actually, has that user been adversely affected by the claimed "advertising nature" of this
472:
you stated that antiangiogenetic drugs are being used to treat PXE retinopathy. This sounds logical, but a PXE website is not really the kind of source one would prefer for such a claim. Unless you can provide peer-reviewed published reports, I think this is all pretty anecdotal. Try discussing this
557:
Basically, your attitude to monopolize the article is something not socially acceptable. In the world of medicine and technology, what was right yesterday turned out to be no longer effective. Treatments you insist on the article is ancient history. Knowledge articles can be edited by anybody, you
658:
The way you talk is something like the following: You kill people on the street, and you say "don't look at it, if you don't like it". What you write in your user page comes in a public domain. For example, you get involved in a lewd and obscene conduct in public, you would like to say "you don't
663:
The main thing I'd like to talk about is your uncilivized attitude toward my edit. While I was in the middle of editing, you deleted it right away. Is that the 'civil" standard you're talking about? Basically, the article PXE lacks a lot of recent developments so you might want to do some more
262:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge's policies and guidelines. --
95:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
205:
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of
58:, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
290:
article. I have started a discussion on article organization on the talk page that could use some outside input on the topic of effective and encyclopedic organization of the article. Please weigh in if you can.
713:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
623:
Wikipedians have their userpages where they write about themselves, their interests and their contributions. If you don't like it, don't look at it, but certainly don't leave personal messages the way you did.
525:
tags on the PXE article is obviously inappropriate. It is wikified, and every statement contains sources. I have also explained why I oppose the mention of angiogenesis inhibitors, so this is not an issue of
639:). Only when Sharon Terry came about and provided these references was the content suitable for inclusion. Rather than ranting at me, perhaps you should observe the process and do better next time.
421:
Thanks for your contributions to the talk page. I've spent the last days overhauling the article and I hope you are more satisfied with the article now. Feel free to contribute yourself.
583:
would be valid if you had taken the trouble to respond to my requests, namely to provide evidence that this novel treatment is published in reliable sources, not just a website. See
664:
research if you think you are in that profession. Personally I'm sick and tired of talking to people who are obsessed with bigotry and who think they are the center of the world.
162:. If you are the author of the original text and would like to grant Knowledge permission to copy your text or would like to request permission to use the text, please see
378:
this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
67:
558:
seem to assert that what you think is classic is not acceptable in this fast-chaging world of medicine and technolgoy. And you don't even know who you're talking to.
368:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
221:
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow
Knowledge to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include
129:
article! I noticed that you may need some help with citing sources in
Knowledge. In case you didn't already know, a good starting place would be
536:
but one of verifiability. Please do try to play by the rules. If you think I'm being an autocrat, please consult with other medical autocrats on
820:
576:
I have addressed your points on the PXE talkpage. If the discussion is to be about new treatments for PXE retinopathy we should do it there.
738:
678:
If you don't want anybody to leave an unpleasant personal mesage in your userpage, then you might want to block any edit attempts there.
234:
361:
for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
230:
590:"And you don't even know who you're talking to" - I could reverse the argument. I'd prefer to address the issues rather than an
824:
734:
659:
have to look at it, if you don't like it." That might make sense, but you know I have a freedom of speech,as much as you do.
474:
225:
the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the
725:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
812:
770:
748:
730:
21:
Some editors are in a hurry to delete new articles in the middle of being written. Thank you for their speedy action.
816:
350:
635:. I removed your contributions because they lacked the kind of sources we normally require for medical pages (see
306:
87:
469:
252:
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
85:
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
101:
51:
37:
450:
62:, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
519:
426:
287:
97:
387:
202:
63:
799:
254:
159:
828:
726:
591:
314:
644:
599:
545:
537:
493:
453:
444:. I agree with you that the article should not be deleted (is this for the refrigerator one?).
766:
752:
240:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
194:
180:
73:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
836:
795:
702:
693:
163:
155:
722:
706:
540:; they're a sensible bunch and I usually yield to consensus formed with those contributors.
422:
721:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
636:
632:
584:
509:
383:
373:
342:
245:
134:
78:
376:
if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that
718:
710:
481:
358:
310:
270:
138:
130:
186:
43:
782:
714:
640:
628:
595:
580:
541:
489:
445:
369:
365:
364:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
354:
346:
328:
198:
59:
55:
832:
530:
485:
781:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
197:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge. This has been done under
54:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge. This has been done under
627:
Your previous message demonstrates that you have failed to grasp the basics of
334:
679:
665:
561:
403:
167:
142:
112:
22:
264:
151:
137:
or
Harvard referencing templates but there are many other methods listed in
126:
805:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
353:
from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
484:
unless you are going to provide a rationale for your move. I provided an
292:
441:
226:
840:
742:
687:
673:
649:
604:
569:
550:
498:
458:
430:
411:
391:
318:
295:
276:
170:
145:
115:
105:
30:
709:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
160:
http://www.garynull.com/documents/Arthritis/Friendly_Bacteria.htm
757:
333:
258:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
185:
91:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
64:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
42:
587:
for the standards we apply for sources in medical articles.
150:
Unfortunately I had to remove the text you added to the
823:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
379:
788:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
488:
when I made my edit, and I expect you to do the same.
440:
I deleted it because it was putting the article into
349:, by another Knowledge user, requesting that it be
309:. I really have no idea but it sounds quite serious
229:, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at
68:
notability guideline for companies and corporations
701:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
305:Could you explain what you are referring to in
199:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
201:, because the article appears to be a blatant
56:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
8:
794:notice, but please explain why in your
125:Thanks for your contributions to the
7:
286:Hi Chmyr, you previously edited the
233:for more details, or ask a question
231:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
154:article since it would have been a
783:deleted for any of several reasons
773:because of the following concern:
66:, as well as our subject-specific
14:
727:review the candidates' statements
841:03:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
733:. For the Election committee,
703:Arbitration Committee election
694:ArbCom elections are now open!
650:21:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
341:Hello, this is a message from
227:GNU Free Documentation License
1:
777:Non notable technical device.
743:17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
480:In general, please don't use
475:Talk:Pseudoxanthoma elasticum
133:. I personally use standard
111:Okay, go ahead and delete it.
106:01:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
688:20:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
674:20:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
442:the speedy deletion category
319:18:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
296:03:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
277:03:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
171:03:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
158:to include text copied from
146:22:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
141:that you can choose from. –
116:02:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
60:criteria for speedy deletion
31:20:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
827:allows discussion to reach
808:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
791:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
729:and submit your choices on
605:23:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
570:19:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
551:20:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
499:22:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
372:. Feel free to contact the
345:. A tag has been placed on
121:Citing sources in Knowledge
856:
819:exist. In particular, the
735:MediaWiki message delivery
459:20:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
431:08:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
412:20:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
813:proposed deletion process
436:Deleting the "hangon" tag
307:Talk:2007 Korea oil spill
210:, but not as a source of
193:A tag has been placed on
50:A tag has been placed on
683:
669:
565:
470:pseudoxanthoma elasticum
407:
392:02:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
216:say it in your own words
214:. This part is crucial:
26:
17:Abuse of speedy deletion
800:the article's talk page
581:monopolizing an article
255:the article's talk page
88:the article's talk page
779:
762:
338:
190:
47:
825:articles for deletion
775:
771:proposed for deletion
761:
707:Arbitration Committee
337:
288:Open Handset Alliance
282:Open Handset Alliance
189:
52:Mobile internet world
46:
38:Mobile internet world
223:on the external site
711:arbitration process
629:assuming good faith
592:appeal to authority
179:Speedy deletion of
166:for how to do so. –
156:copyright violation
36:Speedy deletion of
817:deletion processes
763:
723:arbitration policy
579:You accusation of
339:
191:
135:citation templates
48:
749:Proposed deletion
647:
602:
548:
496:
847:
810:
809:
793:
792:
760:
645:
600:
546:
535:
529:
524:
518:
514:
508:
505:Your use of the
494:
456:
452:
448:
351:speedily deleted
343:an automated bot
273:
267:
251:
250:
244:
84:
83:
77:
855:
854:
850:
849:
848:
846:
845:
844:
821:speedy deletion
807:
806:
790:
789:
758:
756:
731:the voting page
697:
633:remaining civil
621:
533:
527:
522:
516:
512:
506:
466:
454:
446:
438:
419:
417:Cloud computing
399:
332:
303:
284:
271:
265:
248:
242:
241:
184:
123:
81:
75:
74:
41:
19:
12:
11:
5:
853:
851:
831:for deletion.
811:will stop the
755:
746:
700:
696:
691:
662:
656:
654:
620:
617:
615:
609:
608:
607:
588:
577:
573:
555:
554:
553:
502:
465:
462:
437:
434:
418:
415:
398:
395:
363:
362:
331:
325:
323:
302:
299:
283:
280:
183:
177:
175:
122:
119:
109:
40:
34:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
852:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
803:
801:
797:
786:
784:
778:
774:
772:
768:
754:
750:
747:
745:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
695:
692:
690:
689:
685:
681:
676:
675:
671:
667:
660:
655:
652:
651:
648:
642:
638:
634:
630:
625:
618:
616:
613:
606:
603:
597:
593:
589:
586:
582:
578:
575:
574:
572:
571:
567:
563:
559:
552:
549:
543:
539:
532:
521:
511:
504:
503:
501:
500:
497:
491:
487:
483:
478:
476:
471:
463:
461:
460:
457:
449:
443:
435:
433:
432:
428:
424:
416:
414:
413:
409:
405:
397:Justification
396:
394:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
375:
371:
367:
366:Kimchi Fridge
360:
356:
355:Kimchi Fridge
352:
348:
347:Kimchi Fridge
344:
336:
330:
329:Kimchi Fridge
326:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
301:Your comments
300:
298:
297:
294:
289:
281:
279:
278:
274:
268:
261:
257:
256:
247:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
204:
200:
196:
188:
182:
178:
176:
173:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
118:
117:
114:
108:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
89:
80:
71:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
45:
39:
35:
33:
32:
28:
24:
16:
815:, but other
804:
796:edit summary
787:
780:
776:
765:The article
764:
698:
677:
661:
657:
653:
626:
622:
614:
610:
560:
556:
520:unreferenced
486:edit summary
479:
467:
439:
420:
400:
377:
374:bot operator
340:
322:
304:
285:
259:
253:
239:
222:
220:
215:
211:
207:
192:
174:
149:
124:
110:
98:Collectonian
92:
86:
72:
49:
20:
619:My userpage
359:advertising
357:is blatant
208:information
719:topic bans
384:CSDWarnBot
164:WP:COPYREQ
829:consensus
769:has been
767:KenBuster
753:KenBuster
715:site bans
311:Nil Einne
212:sentences
203:copyright
195:KenBuster
181:KenBuster
152:Probiotic
127:Probiotic
637:WP:MEDRS
585:WP:MEDRS
327:Spam in
833:Mccapra
139:WP:CITE
131:WP:CITE
798:or on
705:. The
538:WT:MED
510:wikify
447:Keeper
370:WP:WMD
260:speedy
246:hangon
93:speedy
79:hangon
680:Chmyr
666:Chmyr
562:Chmyr
404:Chmyr
275:: -->
168:panda
143:panda
113:Chmyr
23:Chmyr
837:talk
739:talk
684:talk
670:talk
646:T@lk
631:and
601:T@lk
566:talk
547:T@lk
515:and
495:T@lk
482:undo
427:talk
423:samj
408:talk
388:talk
380:here
315:talk
272:talk
269:<
266:pb30
235:here
102:talk
27:talk
751:of
699:Hi,
641:JFW
596:JFW
542:JFW
531:POV
490:JFW
473:at
468:On
464:PXE
293:N2e
237:.
70:.
839:)
802:.
785:.
741:)
717:,
686:)
672:)
643:|
598:|
594:.
568:)
544:|
534:}}
528:{{
523:}}
517:{{
513:}}
507:{{
492:|
477:.
455:76
429:)
410:)
390:)
317:)
249:}}
243:{{
218:.
104:)
82:}}
76:{{
29:)
835:(
737:(
682:(
668:(
564:(
451:ǀ
425:(
406:(
386:(
313:(
100:(
25:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
