851:
to allow the reader the knowledge that the information was obtained but he official site. You don't even know what you are talking about. I am removing the tags and you can have it 3rrd if you want, but any discussion on the topic will result in siding with my point of view. There is no need for 3rd party references because the only information provided on the site is not refutable and not arguable. I don't know how to fix the references how you think they should be fixed so someone else can come along and fix them, but I am removing the 3rd party tag. It is not a promotional site about a specific store with lots of unflattering information trimmed down, it is VERY basic information about the center and you don't need a 3rd party reference for it.
918:
the largest mall in southern Nevada, but I'm not sure that's a notable claim, especially if no one outside the mall wrote about it. I might buy 'oldest mall in Las Vegas,' if there's third party sources confirming that. Maybe you know things that aren't in the article about what makes this mall special; reading the article, it doesn't sound much different than five or six I could almost hit with a rock from where I'm sitting right now. Of course, if I'm wrong and it is notable, those third party sources are out there- after all, that's what defines notability by
Knowledge's standards, right? No third-party sources = not notable according to
298:
1025:
489:
850:
This is not an article on a movie star or something. It is an article on a mall. It should be fairly obvious that the information is coming from a site affiliated with the mall, and it is SOURCED as such. You tagged the article for third party references and now you are saying it should be written
823:
One man's Gem is another man's clump of clay. The references are not written appropriately. I am frankly tired of improperly referenced articles. I am not going waste my time with intentional screw-ups in articles, I fix enough inadvertent screw-ups. People who write articles with references with the
231:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other
Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.
917:
So sorry; I guess we all forget to sign our notes from time to time. You're right that I haven't followed this conversation from its beginning; looking at the article, I'm not 100% certain what makes this mall notable. The closest thing to an assertion of notability appears to be that it used to be
892:
I am not with the company, the page has been edited by other users beside me (which shows I am not the only person to view it) and if you READ the article or new anything about the mall you would know it is notable enough to have an article on wikipedia. You are now just grasping at straws. Also,
769:
And if we deleted all the information that was gathered and posted on article from official websites of the subject, then half of
Knowledge would go away. I don't care what excerpt from the reliable source article says, it is COMMON SENSE that if you have an article about a mall, the best place to
707:
Also the format of the references themselves is incomplete and do not disclose the company or the page the information is provided. One can place another name for the tag but the reference should contain the page name or page title, as well as the principle from which the page is derived, otherwise
697:
The article does not follow the guidelines listed under WP:Verifiability. The article provides 3 reference but they are all from the company that operates the mall. There are no news sources referenced by which the information can be verified. The store list reads like a catalog WP:CATALOG, what WP
799:
You tell me where to get this reliable 3rd party information from (like how many stores and such) and I will do it. Because the only reliable ways of doing it is getting the information straight from GGP and you think that's a no-no. The other way would be original research and you can't do that
747:
Reliable sources are necessary both to substantiate material within articles and to give credit to authors and publishers in order to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims
276:
Hi! I'm currently available to adopt users at the moment. Would you please explain the areas in which you would like assistance/clarification on? Also, what times of day are you online? That way we could possibly be online together as you edit. Please let me know if you have any questions.
779:
There are no facts in that article that are up for debate. There are X many stores, with X many square feet. The mall opened in this year. This things are not refutable. If you want third party information for a mall, you tell me where to get reliable information from. Or you can go start
752:
The mall catalog has over 50 red links, many stores do not meat WP guidelines for notability. "when considering adding red links to lists, disambiguation pages or templates, editors are encouraged to write the article first, and use the wikiproject or user spaces to keep track of unwritten
789:
The Blvd Mall, is a mall that has been open for 40 years and an important part of this community. Your deletion tag wouldn't survive discussion and it would merely be an immature act of laziness. You would rather tag an article for deletion than fix it the way you think it should be
800:
either. You tell me where to get this information, and why you think it's against wiki-guidlines and so important to get a third party resource on how many stores the mall has. Also please point out which information in the article is important to get third party information for.
589:
There is probably a rule about that; it seems familiar. You can ultimately delete them though, as time goes on and the warning is no longer relevant to a particular situation. In this case, this person will soon be blocked (I'm unpleasantly surprised at how long this is taking.)
652:
I think current policy is that removal of warnings from a user's own talkpage is OK, since it indicates that they have read the warning. I know it's a pain looking through history to check for other warnings - if you want to avoid this I suggest you use a tool such as
824:
intent to conceal the 'first party' nature of the sources deserve to have their articles deleted. That's the way it should be, so If I were you I would fix the references. At minimum it should be immediately clear to the viewer who is the source.
563:
If he wants to blank his own talkpage, that's his call - it's annoying and frustrating, but irrelevant ultimately because if the vandalism continues, he will be blocked. If he's blanking other talkpages, then reporting him at AIV is right.
351:
Hi- I was just looking through the proposals for what the main page should look like, and saw your note that you'd like to be able to have a personalize main page. Since you say you're learning the ropes, I thought I'd tell you that there
382:
If you want to try tweaking one of the available designs, you can make a new page in your userspace - edit a new page "en.wikipedia.org/Chexmix53/my main page," or whatever you want to call it, and use that URL in the monobook script.
698:
is not. By what is presented in the
Article and following guidelines I think there should be a call for deletion. The tags have been replaced, if removed again before proper references are provided I will simply call for deletion.
1002:
Hey! How are things? We haven't spoken in quite some time. I've been reviewing some of your contribs since we last talked. Are you interested in exploring more about Wiki? Please send me a message on my talk page! :)
356:
a way to do this. Quick customization isn't quite as easy as with iGoogle or MSN or whatever, but there are several versions to choose from. If you don't like any of them, I might be able to help you fiddle with them.
966:
article because it is a horrible, terrible, error-ridden, disastrous piece of information. It has to be corrected. It is an outrage and it says something terrible about
Knowledge that they consider this their "best
1066:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
759:
This is the thing that drives me crazy about
Knowledge. If instead of taking the time to write out all that information, you would have taken 2 minutes to properly source the references, then it would be
367:
Note 2: Make sure the person who tells you how to edit your monobook is trustworthy (in this case I'll direct you to WP-approved instructional pages, so you don't have to worry about whether or not I'm
865:
I think that the general consensus around
Knowledge is that, if no one outside a company cares enough to write about it, there's no real reason for Knowledge to write about it, either. The
534:
982:
I was refering to the STUDIO 60 article, not the aaron sorkin article (see heading). I just think that you need to tame your comments down to an appropriate level.
379:
to preview some of the main page designs people have made. At the bottom of the page you'll find instructions for how to change the main page's default URL.
809:
Also, I would appreciate it if while you were running around placing inappropriate tags on articles if you would take 1 second to sign your posts. Thanks!
92:
740:
These aspects of reference are important for notability and verifiability, neither of which are provided by the article or the references.
1091:
175:
360:
Basically, you're going to edit your "monobook," which is a user-specific page that lets you change some aspects of how
Knowledge works.
1029:
411:
185:
932:
632:
376:
310:
1087:
67:
770:
get the standard information about the mall is from the mall's official website, or the website of the company that owns it.
468:
and to prevent abuse. The vandal in question likes to make fun for hmself using the unblock template. Hope that explains,
302:
662:
1078:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1083:
710:" Citations for world wide web articles (for reliable sources such as the Australian War Memorial) typically include:
599:
573:
546:
139:
198:
162:
720:
the name of the website (linked to a
Knowledge article about the site if it exists, or to Website's "about page"),
745:
Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
193:
972:
251:
221:
107:
658:
603:
577:
550:
415:
469:
216:
47:
928:
636:
511:
449:
434:
167:
537:. Someone will deal with it soon (if I was an admin, it would be done already.) Thanks for your help. —
968:
753:
articles." " " article should be created for the topic because it would be notable and verifiable; "
657:- I believe these look at the recent history of a user's talk page. Sorry I took a while to respond.
628:
259:
240:
42:
1079:
828:
702:
157:
72:
180:
57:
621:
I was REVERTING vandalism on the Two Face page, half the page was deleted by an anon. I'm user
1055:
1046:
1035:
682:
318:
203:
52:
729:
the date you retrieved it (invisible to the reader if the article has a date of publication),
1075:
1059:
923:
654:
445:
430:
301:
In support of Operation COOKIE MONSTER (OCM) I'm presenting WikiCookies in appreciation for
112:
102:
87:
1074:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1004:
595:
569:
542:
395:
278:
255:
144:
117:
97:
77:
21:
901:) 23:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)) when trying to argue about wikipedia guidelines. Thanks!
1071:
1063:
983:
902:
894:
852:
825:
810:
737:
699:
465:
244:
149:
82:
62:
444:
I would like a reply from you, to clear up the warning that you left on my talk page.-
1067:
749:
530:
306:
122:
963:
678:
622:
314:
127:
37:
372:
In your monobook, you can tell WP to use any website you want for the main page.
919:
866:
297:
677:? It was blanked, and I unblanked it. Whatever, its been over for days anyway.
591:
565:
538:
392:
496:
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, it is much appreciated.
211:
24:
predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
1095:
1040:
1013:
991:
976:
937:
910:
860:
830:
818:
704:
686:
666:
640:
607:
581:
554:
516:
476:
453:
438:
419:
400:
322:
287:
263:
250:
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on
296:
1062:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
232:
Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.
429:
I have replied to the warning you placed on my talk page.-
748:
made: exceptional claims require high-quality sources. "
254:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --
535:
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
780:
tagging every mall article in Knowledge for deletion.
239:
on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on
1054:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
17:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
869:are pretty much the expansion upon that idea.
8:
364:Note 1: Never edit someone else's monobook.
1028:You are invited to join the discussion at
93:List of television shows set in Las Vegas
893:please sign your posts with 4 tildes (
7:
464:Hi. It was sort of a combination of
1033:
717:the title of the article in quotes,
176:List of U.S. states' largest cities
1030:Knowledge talk:Wikipediholism test
714:the name of the author or authors,
186:Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino
14:
1080:review the candidates' statements
962:I am being a bastard over at the
26:
1023:
732:optional comment or small quote.
487:
726:page number(s) (if applicable),
708:its nothing more than a weblink
68:List of shopping malls in Egypt
1086:. For the Election committee,
1056:Arbitration Committee election
1047:ArbCom elections are now open!
992:00:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
977:14:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1096:13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1014:08:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
1082:and submit your choices on
938:00:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
911:23:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
861:23:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
831:21:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
819:17:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
705:00:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
454:20:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
252:the SuggestBot request page
140:San Antonio Shopping Center
1111:
1088:MediaWiki message delivery
687:22:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
667:14:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
641:21:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
608:00:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
582:00:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
555:00:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
264:18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
247:, SuggestBot's caretaker.
199:Henry W. Grady High School
163:List of U.S. state fossils
29:
517:22:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
477:11:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
439:01:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
420:23:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
194:Holy Cross Convent School
133:
1041:04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
987:
906:
898:
856:
814:
401:22:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
323:05:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
293:Operation COOKIE MONSTER
222:Orleans Hotel and Casino
108:Talmadge Memorial Bridge
625:just never logged in.
288:02:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
460:Re: Talk page deletion
377:Main Page alternatives
325:
241:SuggestBot's talk page
217:Burlington Square Mall
48:Nevada State Route 147
1060:Arbitration Committee
867:notability guidelines
391:Happy customizing! —
300:
168:Parliament-Funkadelic
723:date of publication,
43:Mall of the Emirates
1064:arbitration process
743:" Reliable sources
533:and reported it on
73:Ash Springs, Nevada
1076:arbitration policy
659:Soaringgoldeneagle
347:personal main page
326:
181:Hilbre High School
58:Criterion validity
643:
631:comment added by
472:Blood Red Sandman
425:Vandalism warning
229:
228:
204:Mastermind School
53:Duckwater, Nevada
1102:
1039:
1027:
1026:
1009:
1008:- Jameson L. Tai
936:
626:
508:
501:
495:
491:
490:
474:
311:Independence Day
283:
282:- Jameson L. Tai
113:Jarbidge, Nevada
103:Ibn Battuta Mall
88:Elisabeth Elliot
27:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1084:the voting page
1050:
1024:
1021:
1007:
1000:
998:Adoption Update
969:Homely Features
960:
926:
695:
674:
650:
618:
524:
502:
497:
488:
486:
484:
470:
462:
427:
349:
305:service to the
295:
281:
274:
243:. Thanks from
145:Huntington Mall
118:Justin Chambers
98:Crystal, Nevada
78:American Top 40
19:
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1020:
1017:
999:
996:
995:
994:
959:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
840:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
804:
803:
802:
801:
794:
793:
792:
791:
784:
783:
782:
781:
774:
773:
772:
771:
764:
763:
762:
761:
734:
733:
730:
727:
724:
721:
718:
715:
709:
694:
691:
690:
689:
673:
670:
649:
646:
645:
644:
617:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
592:Justin (koavf)
566:Justin (koavf)
539:Justin (koavf)
523:
520:
483:
480:
461:
458:
457:
456:
426:
423:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
370:
369:
365:
348:
345:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
294:
291:
273:
272:Adoption offer
270:
268:
227:
226:
225:
224:
219:
214:
209:
206:
201:
196:
191:
188:
183:
178:
173:
170:
165:
160:
155:
152:
150:Chris Daughtry
147:
142:
137:
132:
131:
130:
125:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
83:Adam and Steve
80:
75:
70:
65:
63:Lake Las Vegas
60:
55:
50:
45:
40:
35:
33:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1098:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1032:. Thanks. —
1031:
1019:Quixotic plea
1018:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
965:
957:
939:
934:
930:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
868:
864:
863:
862:
858:
854:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
832:
829:
827:
822:
821:
820:
816:
812:
808:
807:
806:
805:
798:
797:
796:
795:
788:
787:
786:
785:
778:
777:
776:
775:
768:
767:
766:
765:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
751:
746:
741:
739:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
713:
712:
711:
706:
703:
701:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:
671:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
624:
620:
619:
615:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
588:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
562:
559:
558:
557:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
521:
519:
518:
514:
513:
507:
506:
500:
494:
481:
479:
478:
475:
473:
467:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
424:
422:
421:
417:
413:
402:
399:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
380:
378:
373:
366:
363:
362:
361:
358:
355:
346:
344:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:United States
304:
299:
292:
290:
289:
286:
285:
284:
271:
269:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
248:
246:
242:
238:
233:
223:
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
171:
169:
166:
164:
161:
159:
158:Pennrose Mall
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
135:
134:
129:
126:
124:
123:Bill Plaschke
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
34:
31:
30:
28:
25:
23:
16:
1051:
1036:Technical 13
1022:
1006:
1005:
1001:
964:Aaron Sorkin
961:
958:Aaron Sorkin
839:
744:
742:
735:
696:
651:
648:RE: Question
623:User:Bly1993
616:My vandalism
586:
560:
529:I talked on
526:
525:
510:
504:
503:
498:
492:
485:
471:
463:
428:
412:74.4.134.198
409:
396:
381:
374:
371:
368:trustworthy)
359:
353:
350:
327:
280:
279:
275:
267:
249:
236:
235:If you have
234:
230:
128:Ford Academy
38:Dave Tollner
20:
924:FisherQueen
738:WP:CITE#HOW
633:24.161.7.11
627:—Preceding
446:Mr Adequate
431:Mr Adequate
172:Add Sources
1072:topic bans
256:SuggestBot
22:SuggestBot
1068:site bans
984:Chexmix53
903:Chexmix53
895:Chexmix53
853:Chexmix53
811:Chexmix53
693:Blvd Mall
527:I'm on it
522:Vandalism
493:Thank you
309:. Happy
245:ForteTuba
933:contribs
672:Two-Face
629:unsigned
587:Warnings
561:Blanking
499:Washburn
303:military
237:feedback
212:Yuen Wah
679:Bly1993
466:WP:DENY
410:sdfsdf
315:Ndunruh
136:Cleanup
1058:. The
967:work".
790:fixed.
750:WP:RED
655:Huggle
531:WP:IRC
482:Thanks
375:Go to
208:Expand
190:Wikify
826:PB666
760:over.
700:PB666
154:Merge
32:Stubs
1092:talk
1034:{{U|
988:talk
973:talk
929:talk
920:WP:N
907:talk
899:talk
857:talk
815:talk
683:talk
663:talk
637:talk
512:talk
450:talk
435:talk
416:talk
393:eitc
319:talk
260:talk
1052:Hi,
1038:}}
922:. -
505:mav
1094:)
1070:,
990:)
975:)
931:·
909:)
859:)
817:)
736:"
685:)
665:)
639:)
606:☯
580:☯
553:☯
515:)
452:)
437:)
418:)
354:is
321:)
313:!
262:)
1090:(
986:(
971:(
935:)
927:(
905:(
897:(
855:(
813:(
681:(
661:(
635:(
604:M
602:☺
600:C
598:☮
596:T
594:❤
590:—
578:M
576:☺
574:C
572:☮
570:T
568:❤
564:—
551:M
549:☺
547:C
545:☮
543:T
541:❤
509:(
448:(
433:(
414:(
397:h
317:(
258:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.