User talk:Ched/Archive 19 - Knowledge (XXG)

2127: 2203: 2109: 2118: 1847:, and was actually quite impressed with their ability to take advice, and how quickly they are learning. (already doing references, which often takes a while for some users). I will certainly keep an eye on their work (more for the "rollback" than the NPP stuff). He/she also seems to be doing the prerequisite reading on policy and guideline stuff. The autopatrolled seemed appropriate if they want to do NPP, as it seems rather redundant to patrol a patroller. :). Please feel free to drop a note if you spot anything out of line. The NFCC is a good point, and I'll drop that link to them. Also, if there's any of these tools you feel could help you out, let me know and I'll gladly hook you up too. Cheers and best. — 2725: 2145: 2194: 2167: 126:

Lewinsky article should be kept, because it seems to be the case that this word has actually entered the general parlance to some degree (or at least had at one time) whereas this is not really the case with the term Santorum--i.e. one is a linguistically notable neologism and one is not. On the other hand, one could argue that the Lewinsky word has had no meaningful impact on politics or culture, where as the thing with Santorum has had a direct impact on a presidential campaign--this is undeniably true--and been a prime example of the "Google Bomb" phenomenon

2136: 2091: 2082: 2158: 2185: 2604: 2100: 237:

issues in particular. That is, someone like Santorum will not go over well among most contributors here due to his social conservatism. Knowledge (XXG) is pretty queer friendly--which is quite admirable, I wish we were more female friendly--and I think in general the kind of people who contribute here are less likely to take a strong stance on issues of personal behavior from a moral or religious perspective than the population at large. So that would be a sort of "liberal" bias.

200:

environment that encourages a liberal mindset. Not a bad thing. The dynamics of it all is in a constant state of flux. Sometimes it's a 60/40 thing, and sometimes it's a 50/50 thing. Where I live there is an old saying: "If you're not a liberal when you're young - you have no heart. ..., If you're not a conservative when you're old - you have no brain" I can't say that I subscribe to that in it's entirety, but I also see some insight to it.

38: 2212: 2042: 1743: 2059: 2176: 188:

here. I realize and understand that there are often some very subconscious thoughts that move people to voice the views they do. (myself included). I do my very best to disassociate myself from my personal feelings, and be objective. To be honest, I'd rather see a "Lewinsky" article, than a "santorum" one. But I know that it's an inconsistent view.

1076: 257:

is arguably more conservative in the economic realm. For example, I doubt there is a particularly strong pro-union sentiment among editors here, indeed likely the opposite (for a long time now I've had in my sandbox a partially completed article--which I will finish one day!--about one of the most important strikes in the U.S. in many years, the

1119: 867:)) of this article kept removing the maintenance template despite my warnings to her/him, without her/him first addressing the notability of the article, as even the Bangladeshi language version has the same "notability?", "verifiability?" tag added to it. Would a short block be appropriate here for her/him? Thoughts? -- 2068: 2507:

The National Archives has hundreds of thousands of digitized documents in its holdings. We are working on a bulk upload to Commons of one particular cache of about 123,000 TIFF master files in the next few days! Once uploaded, these will require a massive community effort to help categorize the files

256:

Perhaps overall en.wikipedia is as much libertarian as anything, which is consistent with both of the above points. That's not just because of our somewhat Randian founder, but also because I think these "free culture" type projects attract a lot of libertarian types. Because of this, Knowledge (XXG)

236:

I've often thought it would be interesting to do a study--and maybe someone has--about political bias in Knowledge (XXG) articles and among contributors. Having worked in a number of political areas of the project, my guess would be that there is a strong liberal bias when it comes to "cultural" type

182:

Last thought/post for tonight. Again, I am truly honored to be approached by such an established Wikipedian. To be honest, my early time here was spent trying to just fly under the radar. Edit articles, try to not be obnoxious, and avoid any controversy whatsoever. When I grew disgruntled, I took

1575:

This is probably a sock (or pretending to be) of the guy who made some comment to Off2riorob about "kissing" his mother, or some such, several days ago. Rob took great offense to that. I would have also. The pic of Lawanda Page is probably just further taunting. Note that the guy is pretending to be

194:

strong feelings and emotions on all sides here; but I say leave that to the blogs and opinion pieces. I don't condem those who feel strongly one way or the other. I don't ever mean to patronize or deride those who don't share my views. I admire the entire "consensus" concept that we have in place.

2659:

Hey there Jenks ... yea ... I think I must of hit the enter key on the wrong "Jimbo" on that. I thought I remembered that Jimbo lived somewhere near Atlanta at one point, and wondered if he (Jimbo Wales), saw or heard about that 19 inning game and controversial call at the end. Guess I was in too

1713:

Always good to get a break to recharge those batteries. I had a rather long one myself. Life is fantastic here, although a bit hectic at times. Hope after my daughter's wedding next weekend I can get a bit more of my WP time back. Got a few articles in mind that really need attention ... lol.

940:

new editor, I'm not going to block at this time. That would simply be punitive, and I don't see a need right now since they aren't currently editing. Looking at the article .. I'd say 1) There really only needs to be one expansion tag for the article, not one in every section. 2) actually? .. Ya

820:

Do you know Pedro too then? .. or just from my contribs? ... Anyway, thank you for the link. It seems the discussion is in several different places. I've commented in some, but I can easily imagine that I'm missing a few too though. Early results seem to be favoring them gaining that ability. I

331:

OHHH .. don't go away .. I am fascinated by this conversation. Unfortunately I'm under a huge time crunch at the moment. (damn real life keeps getting in the way of my Knowledge (XXG) time .. lol). I have to admit, that I'll need to research a few of your references, as they actually went over my

193:

Yes, I agree and I believe you are 100% correct that cases can be made on both sides of the "santorum vs. lewinsky" debate. Rather than make a case for one or the other, I'd offer that neither one are really the type of things that an "encyclopedic" venture should be putting forth. Yes, there are

125:

I definitely see your point, and think that it's quite valid to see it as odd or just plain wrong for someone to want to delete the Lewinsky article and keep the Santorum one. But I don't think that position, or its inverse, are inherently inconsistent or hypocritical. One could argue that only the

137:

Like I said I just felt like saying this, I guess because you've always seemed like a very reasonable sort of fellow and probably wouldn't mind if someone popped in to say "hey Ched, I think you are kinda wrong about that!" for no particular reason. Also it's probably a good idea to stagger awards

390:

in any way which could refer to the actions of editors may be regarded as comparing them to Nazis, and hence a personal attack. I'm not sure that I entirely endorse that view myself, but I noticed that you've used it a few times and so you might want to be aware of how it's perceived by others.

246:

I would also assume that more contributors than not are strong civil libertarians, which has come to be seen as a liberal or left-wing position (though it really need not be). So on issues relating to state secrets, individual liberties, perhaps even war and peace, Knowledge (XXG) might well have

275:

Overall I'd say your 60-40 suggested breakdown (liberal vs. conservative) is maybe about right for the project. If so that would actually be better than it is in academia, which for a number of reasons really is more left-oriented in its thinking (conservatives who complain about that are right,

199:

Views: ... In the circle of people that I am in contact with, I will say this. It is often viewed that Knowledge (XXG) is considered a "liberal" slant to political articles. My thoughts are that perhaps the bulk of the editors here are mid-20's, fresh out of school, and have been exposed to an

187:

political discussions in the past. The "santorum" issue caught my attention because I live in PA., and am familiar with the man and his views. (not that I share them). I had/have been concerned about our BLP policies. I view the entire ball of wax as a fork from what we are attempting to do

2520:

We are currently working on a system for including links to pages on Wikimedia projects in the National Archives online catalog. The Wikimedia projects are hosting an increasing number of transcriptions of National Archives documents and high-quality image and video files that are not available

133:

Of course, one can also say that both of these are absolute crap and should be nuked, or even that both should be kept. People have gotten very heated about these two articles for understandable reasons, but I think the issues are a bit more grey and open to debate than some are suggesting.

2521:

through NARA's own site. Links to these Wikimedia pages in the documents' actual catalog records will benefit the end user by providing them access to further resources about the documents, and they will also demonstrate the National Archives commitment to supporting Wikimedians' efforts.

2069: 2070: 1823:

and the various file policies. I hope you don't think I'm badgering either you or PumpkinSky, and I fully understand that these user privileges are no big deal. However, he has only been here a week or two, so his use/knowledge of these tools may not be particularly great yet. Cheers!

2301:

is an opportunity for Wikipedians to get their work related to National Archives holdings spotlighted on Archives.gov and the National Archives' tumblr. Each day the National Archives selects a document related to the day's date to showcase. The goal is to get articles related to the

294:

and then was popularized by Clemenceau, though interestingly even earlier John Adams said something similar (albeit more elitist--he was not much of a fan of the common fellow, or lady!). It's definitely been through a number of iterations and entered the realm of folk wisdom at this

725:

once said: "if you carry out a policy or scheme that dehumanises others, in that process you become dehumanised as well." So true. So... knowing that these impersonator thinks that they got a kick out of it but no... they've actually lost it without them knowing of it. Peace, out.

205:

I realize that I have rambled on and on here, and I apologize for that. You offered me the chance to discuss these issues, and perhaps I took advantage of that. Regardless, I do so appreciate you offering me the opportunity to voice my thoughts. Cheers and best my friend. —

285:

Finally I'm glad you mentioned that saying from your parts. I've always heard that attributed to Churchill--substituting socialist for liberal and referencing ones 20s and ones 50s--but it never sounded like something Churchill would have said. I hunted around and found

2072: 158:

WOW, I am truly flattered Bigtimepeace. I've been an admirer of yours for quite some time, and look forward to replying to this. Unfortunately at this immediate moment, I must run out the door, so this is simply a placeholder. Be back soon. Cheers. —

2126: 1241:

I took a look, and it looks like Ged UK is on top of the Singapore article, and TerriersFan has dealt with the other one. Let me know if there's any more I can help with though. Sorry I wasn't on enough to take care of it for you. Cheers. —

2310:

the same day that the National Archives features the document. Alternatively, other appropriate articles related to National Archives holdings not already selected will be used for new documents of the day by NARA staff and posted to their

261:

strike of late 2008. It was an enormous news story at the time and an important labor action, yet no one bothered to create an article about it so far as I know.) So on matters economic I think more editors here are likely to be partial to

435:

BTW, if this in regards the shameful BarkingMoon incident, then I am most certainly willing to discuss it further. The entire episode has left a very foul taste in my mouth, and I'm not ashamed to state my views on it. Cheers again. —

2402: 2012:

to featured or good status in English and other languages. Prizes for winners will be a gift package from the National Archives including a book of your choice or a tote bag, and other swag, plus, of course, a special

2272:) and would like to request an article be written for the team, if Wikipedians deem it notable. It is hoped that making more information about the group available on Knowledge (XXG) will increase public awareness of 2326:. On Wikisource, editors transcribe, proofread, and arrange documents. This helps to make little-known documents more discoverable, or well-known documents more searchable, and improves accessibility. See the files 2664:

Jimbo page I was on .. lol. Oh well, kinda stale by now, so I guess there's not much to do at this point. Guess I'll stop by and apologize to "Jimbo online". Thanks for the note. Cheers and Best Jenks. —

821:

hope it just turns out to be a technical thing, but I sure can see the potential there for some real problems if it would get used wrong. Anyway, thanks for hooking me up there MacMed. Cheers and best. —

1501:

Ummm ... ok. I a little lost here. There's obviously something here that I'm not aware of. I'm not sure what to say or do here. Can you clarify (here or email), and let me know what to say or do? —

1176:

Seeing that she continues to ignore our invitations to discuss this despite our many attempts, wouldn't you agree that a BLOCK is needed right now to carry our message across? Anyway, I was told that

2397: 2071: 1279:, you said "WMF has even posted their desire to move away from the fair use stuff". I took a look around foundation-l and couldn't find anything regarding this. Where did you see this posted? -- 2248:

The National Archives' Archival Recovery Team (ART) is a team of law enforcement agents and archivists who investigate NARA's lost and stolen documents. They have received media attention (

2303: 1216:. Could you please either block them or protect the respective article pages until more concrete solutions can be undertaken to resolve the issues. Sorry to trouble you again, best. -- 1839:

Good morning there RE. Never a problem (badger) to ask about my edits and actions, I encourage that from all editors. Ummm .. yea, they are fairly new, but "meh" .. I'm a pretty

2407: 2033:, a tour of the building by NARA staff, and then time for a scanathon and editathon in the research rooms and library until the building closes at 5 pm. Keep your schedules open! 1001:

Meh ... looks ok to me. Ping me next Sunday and I'll delete. You got the notability part mentioned, I'd say that should suffice. If I was more knowledgeable on the individual

2532: 2378: 1662: 2298: 2202: 2427: 2358: 1209: 850: 122:

Hey Ched, hope you are doing well. I noticed your comments on the Lewinsky word AfD--where I am not commenting, just because--and felt like responding for some reason.

1360:

I've posed the question to him. I wouldn't be surprised if OrangeMarlin is undergoing a recuperative process, and that wikipedia is way down his list of priorities. ←

183:

a break rather than speak my mind. I watched for a year, read the posts, and never spoke my mind. I decided that I needed to voice my thoughts here. I had avoided

1991: 2117: 1876:

where s/he raised a good question, observed well and probably understood my answer better than a long-time user. (I have no time to deal with it right now.) --

1335:

I haven't heard anything. I might go ask Mastcell later today, he seems to be pretty close to the guy. I'll let you know as soon as I hear anything Bugs. —

1072:

On another note, can you grant me autoreviewer rights? I'm in the middle of something and I need it to assist me, disregard if you can't, thanks in advance.

652: 2108: 941:

might want to put the whole thing up for AfD (or PROD it). I'm not really seeing anything there that's establishing any WP:N. Just IMHO. Cheers Dave. —

696:

Hey Dave. Well, if you have someone going to the trouble to impersonate you, then you must be doing something right. :). Glad it's been taken care of. —

2738:

in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together!

1541: 485:

No, it's unrelated. I was searching for use of the term and your name kept popping up. If you'd like to discuss BarkingMoon I'd rather do it off-line.

227:

Thanks for responding and thanks for the kind words--you flatter me sir! I basically agree with everything you say so we're not really differing on this.

138:

and dissenters from your viewpoints throughout your talk page, so I'm totally helping in that regard. Anyhow, no big deal, happy editing and all that. --

2724: 2422: 2558:

Hey Dominic, I'll take a look early next week. My daughter's wedding is Sat. .. and just don't have the time through this coming weekend. Cheers. —

1996: 1924:

Hey Dominic, I'll take a look early next week. My daughter's wedding is Sat. .. and just don't have the time through this coming weekend. Cheers. —

1776: 797:

Hey Ched, I just noticed your bits4crats subpage, and I have to say I agree with a lot of what you're saying there. I also just wanted to point out

1904: 1759:. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area! 798: 1908:

has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved.

1126:

for the autopatrolled. Seems some wording's been changed over that PC/FR/Recent Changes trial. Hadn't read through all that for a while. —

864: 646: 134:

Personally I haven't read through all of the arguments and am not entirely sure where I stand on either of them (not that anyone cares).

1622: 1604: 1580: 1535: 1487: 1418: 1364: 1325: 751: 685: 1177: 1002: 600:), who is currently going around to impersonate as me vandalising/irritating others and/or reverting some of my edits. Can you help? -- 247:

what could be considered a left-wing bias (though circa 1940 these sort of views were not inconsistent with a aspects of conservatism).

2193: 2144: 1679:

Thanks for clear words in a clean thread, that is a bit better than the mess we had so far. Back to content, as said before, smile, --

363: 314: 148: 2327: 1815:

should be removed, as he has not created enough articles to demonstrate that he doesn't need anybody patrolling his articles; and

410:

Indeed. Amazing thought experiment, isn't it? But thank you for your note, it is actually appreciated Will. Cheers and best. —

1808: 801:

RFC in response to your point about inactive 'crat accounts. I'm sure you saw already, but just in case you hadn't :) Regards,

1764: 1751: 1479: 597: 2417: 2261: 2166: 2025:

event at the National Archives II facility in College Park, MD. There will be a regular social meetup, a discussion with

721:

Well, that's not the first time that me or Bugs had been impersonated and it most certainly won't be the last. Archbishop

670: 2330:. If you are new to Wikisource and would like to participate, there are experienced Wikisourcerors willing to be mentors. 2008: 809: 2252: 2135: 1559: 658: 287: 263: 2258: 2090: 2221: 2002: 1873: 548: 464: 258: 45: 1547: 936:

OK, I did look, and I left a note on their talk page. Since they haven't edited in several days, and they are a

858: 640: 104: 96: 91: 79: 74: 66: 2735: 2711: 2590: 2184: 2157: 2022: 2249: 1844: 1829: 1618:

Keep in mind that the only reason you and your socks aren't already blocked is that Ched is a patient sort. ←

1608: 1529: 1491: 2368: 1589:

Now Bugs, this has nothing to do with socks or taunting. Lawanda Page was a terrific actress and a perfect

1600: 2641: 2623: 2615: 2243: 2081: 1881: 1684: 1670: 1651: 1095:

Do you mean "autopatrolled"? Looks like you already have the reviewer right. If so, then sure ... np. —

854: 472: 359: 353:

No rush at all on a reply Ched, just drop me a note pointing me back here if you are so inclined. :-) --

310: 144: 1702: 1643: 1524: 545: 492: 398: 2099: 1701:

Hey life is great and I took a break a while back but now I'm back to do some work. How are you doing.

2674: 2567: 2451: 1933: 1856: 1802: 1723: 1511: 1452: 1390: 1344: 1303: 1284: 1251: 1135: 1104: 1048: 1018: 950: 897: 830: 773: 705: 635: 565: 524: 445: 419: 341: 215: 168: 2686:

No worries :) Yeah, those bloody search boxes can change on you just as you click. Best to you too,

1443:

Yea, and likely be at least a week before he gets home if things go well. (which I pray they do). —

2644:

and thought you might like to know that you appear to have confused him with someone else. Cheers,

2455: 2439: 2255: 1825: 1590: 2267: 1756: 1619: 1577: 1415: 1361: 1322: 748: 682: 591: 2603: 23: 2743: 2691: 2649: 2619: 1913: 1877: 1680: 1666: 1647: 1482:

passed away almost 9 years ago, but I guess its still a touchy subject. I for one will never

468: 386: 354: 305: 139: 2443: 2319: 2030: 1963: 1895: 1820: 807: 487: 393: 266:" style economists, rather than Karl Marx or even Paul Krugman. I could be wrong about that. 2412: 2307: 2211: 1840: 1197:

Sorry Dave, I'm too tired to look at this objectively ... I'll check it out in the morning.

2669: 2562: 2382: 2372: 2362: 1928: 1851: 1798: 1718: 1594: 1506: 1447: 1385: 1339: 1298: 1280: 1246: 1153:

Yup, that got me mightily confused for a split second there as well. Oh well... thanks! --

1130: 1099: 1043: 1013: 945: 892: 886:

Why are there so many RevDel items in the article history? Did something get out of hand?

825: 768: 700: 560: 519: 440: 414: 336: 291: 210: 163: 1768:

on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.

2508:

on Commons and add them to articles on Knowledge (XXG) or transcribe them on Wikisource.

276:

though it's partially because a lot of smart conservatives choose not to enter academe).

2614:

is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving

2463: 2459: 2041: 54: 17: 1762:

There also is a Knowledge (XXG) & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist

1218: 1182: 1155: 1082: 974: 869: 728: 619: 602: 587: 2739: 2687: 2645: 2447: 2058: 2026: 1909: 1780: 1742: 722: 1843:

for things here. I did exchange and email or two with him/her, and did look over

1009:, but this at least gives it a chance. If they remove the PROD, we'll try AfD. — 2435: 802: 747:

I defer to the Philosophy of Yogi: "If you can't imitate him, don't copy him." ←

53:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2746: 2695: 2681: 2653: 2627: 2574: 2264: 1940: 1916: 1885: 1863: 1833: 1730: 1707: 1688: 1674: 1655: 1626: 1612: 1584: 1518: 1495: 1459: 1422: 1397: 1368: 1351: 1329: 1310: 1288: 1258: 1224: 1188: 1161: 1142: 1111: 1088: 1055: 1025: 980: 957: 904: 875: 837: 814: 780: 755: 734: 712: 689: 625: 608: 572: 551: 531: 498: 476: 452: 426: 404: 367: 348: 318: 222: 175: 152: 130:

a minor touchstone in the debate over gay rights (which I also think is true).

2479: 2270: 2273: 2475: 1784: 1213: 2175: 2398:

Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii

2323: 617:

Please disregard that last message, Gogo Dodo just blocked him. --

2531:

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your name from

1775:

You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list

586:

Hi Ched, I wish to make complain about a newly registered user

1180:

are rarely capable of any constructive engagement, so true. --

384:

There's been some recent discussion to the effect that citing

32: 2408:

Resolutions of the Joint Committee on the Washington Monument

1951: 1947: 2736:

Knowledge (XXG) meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon

2602: 1994:

was announced. We are aiming to improve the articles on the

1741: 290:

blog post which suggested that the original quote came from

2237:

This section includes special requests from the NARA staff:

1819:

is usually reserved for users who are knowledgeable about

1321:

Any idea what's up with the user OrangeMarlin? Any news? ←

1208:

Ched, we really need your help to stop the POV-pushers on

304:

Anyhow, thanks again for your reply, have a good one! --

2428:

Alexander Hamilton's commission to take rank as Colonel

1565: 1553: 1483: 1276: 1173: 676: 664: 972:

Damn, look at my clumsy attempt to prod it. Help? --

2379:

Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom

2345:

A list of some recent contributions to the project:

1811:), you added a couple that he really doesn't need: 1210:Unani and Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital 851:Unani and Ayurvedic Medical College & Hospital 2359:District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act 2642:User talk:Jimbo online#Completely non-wiki topic 764:And he was smarter than your average bear. :) — 2514: 2501: 2423:Susan B. Anthony petition for remission of fine 2348: 2291: 2240: 1984: 556:glad I'm not the only one that thought that. — 1755:on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the 1749:You are invited to the first Knowledge (XXG) 8: 1714:Always good to see buddy. All my best. — 1381:Yes .. that's the same impression I got. — 849:Hi Ched, could I ask you to take a look at 332:head. But I'll catch up ... lol. ttys. — 1955: 1597:gets all riled up when she is mentioned. 921:(struck ... saw they were copy-vio issues) 2274:the documents they are seeking to recover 1958: 1036:never mind ... schools are exempt from A7 2322:has a sister WikiProject on Wikisource, 1905:WikiProject National Archives newsletter 2528: 2489: 2038: 1003:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics) 51:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1992:multilingual featured article contest 1073: 7: 1797:When you changed the usergroups for 1414:He said he's heard nothing so far. ← 634:I have asked for the associated IP 2704:DC-area Meetup, Saturday, August 6 1294:I'll dig out the difs tomorrow. — 31: 2418:A Petition For Universal Suffrage 1576:a sock of some other user also. ← 544:Absolutely-unfucking-believable! 2723: 2712:National Archives Backstage Pass 2403:Petition from women of Brookline 2210: 2201: 2192: 2183: 2174: 2165: 2156: 2143: 2134: 2125: 2116: 2107: 2098: 2089: 2080: 2066: 2057: 2040: 1117: 1074: 884:I'll take a look shortly Dave. 36: 2618:professionals. See you Friday! 2517:Inclusion in the online catalog 24:User talk:Ched Davis/Archive 19 1: 2021:Plans are in the works for a 1964:WikiProject National Archives 1896:WikiProject National Archives 515:done .. email sent to you. — 113:Talk archives from July 2011 2730:On Saturday, August 6, the 1997:Declaration of Independence 2765: 2660:much of a hurry to notice 2335: 2299:Today's Document challenge 2294:Today's Document challenge 2283: 2228: 1976: 1954: 1950: 1779:. -- Message delivered by 1737:GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup 1665:who says makes me sick, -- 259:Republic Windows and Doors 2747:21:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 2710: 2696:19:56, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 2682:19:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 2654:19:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 2628:16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 2589: 2575:21:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 2023:meetup and backstage pass 1941:22:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1917:21:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1886:15:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 1864:14:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 1834:01:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 1731:13:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 1708:00:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 1689:20:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 1675:18:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC) 1656:12:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC) 1627:22:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1613:21:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1585:14:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1519:05:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1496:02:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1460:12:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1423:05:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1398:05:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1369:01:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 1352:11:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1330:03:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1311:03:03, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1289:15:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1259:23:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1225:12:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC) 1189:15:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1178:WP:Single-purpose account 1162:03:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1143:02:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1112:02:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1089:02:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1056:02:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1026:02:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 981:02:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 958:01:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 905:00:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 876:00:35, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 477:15:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 2504:Major image contribution 1987:Featured article contest 838:00:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 815:22:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 781:21:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 756:12:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 735:11:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 713:10:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 690:09:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 626:07:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 609:07:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 573:04:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 552:23:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 532:04:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 499:03:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 453:23:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 427:23:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 405:23:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 368:02:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 349:21:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 319:18:52, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 223:04:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 176:23:37, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 153:22:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2369:Court of the Patriarchs 2049:From our recent uploads 2018:August 6 backstage pass 1174:she's back at it again. 2607: 2524: 2511: 2485: 2333: 2279: 2244:Archival Recovery Team 2036: 1746: 2606: 1990:This week, our first 1745: 1593:, I have no idea why 681:to be blocked also. ← 49:of past discussions. 2476:Archives.gov grabber 2306:on the main page in 2714:- Who should come? 2593:- Who should come? 2308:""Did You Know...?" 581:Impersonator alert! 2608: 2583:DC Meetup, July 29 2304:selected documents 1872:I met the user on 1757:Walters Art Museum 1747: 1005:I might even have 380:First they came... 2752: 2751: 2732:National Archives 2680: 2633: 2632: 2573: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2545: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2466: 2452:George Orwell III 2346: 2339:New contributions 2232:Special requests: 2218: 2217: 2151: 2150: 2073: 2050: 1939: 1862: 1788: 1787: 1729: 1603:comment added by 1517: 1458: 1396: 1350: 1309: 1257: 1223: 1187: 1160: 1141: 1110: 1087: 1054: 1038: 1024: 979: 956: 922: 903: 888:Anywho .. brb. — 874: 836: 779: 733: 711: 624: 607: 571: 530: 451: 425: 387:First they came.. 366: 347: 317: 221: 174: 151: 110: 109: 61: 60: 55:current talk page 22:(Redirected from 2756: 2727: 2708: 2707: 2679: 2677: 2666: 2587: 2586: 2572: 2570: 2559: 2530: 2498: 2497: 2456:Kathleen.wright5 2440:Theornamentalist 2433: 2344: 2214: 2205: 2196: 2187: 2178: 2169: 2160: 2153: 2152: 2147: 2138: 2129: 2120: 2111: 2102: 2093: 2084: 2075: 2074: 2061: 2054: 2053: 2048: 2044: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1938: 1936: 1925: 1861: 1859: 1848: 1818: 1814: 1774: 1772: 1752:Baltimore meetup 1728: 1726: 1715: 1705: 1615: 1569: 1542:deleted contribs 1516: 1514: 1503: 1457: 1455: 1444: 1395: 1393: 1382: 1349: 1347: 1336: 1308: 1306: 1295: 1271:Comment you made 1256: 1254: 1243: 1217: 1181: 1154: 1140: 1138: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1109: 1107: 1096: 1081: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1053: 1051: 1040: 1034: 1023: 1021: 1010: 973: 955: 953: 942: 920: 902: 900: 889: 868: 835: 833: 822: 778: 776: 765: 727: 710: 708: 697: 680: 653:deleted contribs 618: 601: 570: 568: 557: 529: 527: 516: 495: 490: 450: 448: 437: 424: 422: 411: 401: 396: 357: 346: 344: 333: 308: 220: 218: 207: 173: 171: 160: 142: 88: 63: 62: 40: 39: 33: 27: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2706: 2675: 2667: 2640:Hi Ched, I saw 2638: 2585: 2568: 2560: 2537: 2494: 2434:Credit goes to 2351:Knowledge (XXG) 2340: 2328:being worked on 2288: 2233: 2226: 2067: 1981: 1972: 1968: 1934: 1926: 1902:The first ever 1900: 1857: 1849: 1816: 1813:'autopatrolled' 1812: 1795: 1790: 1783:, on behalf of 1739: 1724: 1716: 1703: 1699: 1641: 1598: 1527: 1512: 1504: 1486:again. Peace. 1476: 1453: 1445: 1391: 1383: 1345: 1337: 1319: 1304: 1296: 1273: 1252: 1244: 1136: 1128: 1118: 1116: 1105: 1097: 1075: 1049: 1041: 1019: 1011: 1007:put a CSD on it 951: 943: 898: 890: 855:Sumaiya snigdha 853:? The creator ( 846: 831: 823: 812: 795: 774: 766: 706: 698: 638: 636:203.223.238.224 583: 566: 558: 525: 517: 493: 488: 446: 438: 420: 412: 399: 394: 382: 342: 334: 292:Francois Guizot 216: 208: 169: 161: 120: 84: 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2762: 2760: 2750: 2749: 2728: 2720: 2719: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2637: 2634: 2631: 2630: 2609: 2599: 2598: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2551: 2550: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2538: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2512: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2487: 2486: 2484: 2483: 2472: 2471: 2431: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2415: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2394: 2393: 2391: 2387: 2386: 2376: 2366: 2355: 2354: 2352: 2342: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2332: 2331: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2295: 2290: 2289: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2278: 2277: 2246: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2227: 2219: 2216: 2215: 2207: 2206: 2198: 2197: 2189: 2188: 2180: 2179: 2171: 2170: 2162: 2161: 2149: 2148: 2140: 2139: 2131: 2130: 2122: 2121: 2113: 2112: 2104: 2103: 2095: 2094: 2086: 2085: 2077: 2076: 2063: 2062: 2046: 2037: 2035: 2034: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2009:Bill of Rights 1988: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1969: 1960: 1959: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1899: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1867: 1866: 1826:Reaper Eternal 1794: 1793:Just a comment 1791: 1770: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1698: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1640: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1522: 1521: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1355: 1354: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1192: 1191: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1146: 1145: 1114: 1092: 1091: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1029: 1028: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 963: 962: 961: 960: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 910: 909: 908: 907: 879: 878: 845: 844:Notable topic? 842: 841: 840: 810: 794: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 759: 758: 740: 739: 738: 737: 716: 715: 693: 692: 631: 630: 629: 628: 612: 611: 582: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 482: 481: 480: 479: 456: 455: 430: 429: 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 324: 323: 322: 321: 299: 298: 297: 296: 280: 279: 278: 277: 270: 269: 268: 267: 264:Chicago school 251: 250: 249: 248: 241: 240: 239: 238: 231: 230: 229: 228: 202: 201: 196: 195: 190: 189: 179: 178: 119: 116: 115: 114: 108: 107: 102: 99: 94: 89: 82: 77: 72: 69: 59: 58: 41: 30: 18:User talk:Ched 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2761: 2748: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2734:is hosting a 2733: 2729: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2703: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2678: 2672: 2671: 2663: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2636:Wrong person? 2635: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2582: 2576: 2571: 2565: 2564: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2534: 2527: 2519: 2516: 2515: 2513: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2500: 2499: 2491: 2490: 2488: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2444:Inductiveload 2441: 2437: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2404: 2401: 2399: 2396: 2395: 2392: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2377: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2347: 2337: 2336: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2309: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2285: 2284: 2282: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2256: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2245: 2242: 2241: 2239: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2223: 2213: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2154: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2078: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2045: 2043: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2011: 2010: 2005: 2004: 1999: 1998: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1978: 1977: 1975: 1967: 1965: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1942: 1937: 1931: 1930: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1897: 1893: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1860: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1822: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1792: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1769: 1767: 1766: 1760: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1744: 1736: 1732: 1727: 1721: 1720: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1696: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1638: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1620:Baseball Bugs 1617: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1605:12.191.118.28 1602: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1582: 1579: 1578:Baseball Bugs 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1525:12.191.118.28 1520: 1515: 1509: 1508: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488:12.191.118.28 1485: 1481: 1473: 1461: 1456: 1450: 1449: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1424: 1420: 1417: 1416:Baseball Bugs 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1399: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1362:Baseball Bugs 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1348: 1342: 1341: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1323:Baseball Bugs 1316: 1312: 1307: 1301: 1300: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1270: 1260: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1163: 1159: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1139: 1133: 1132: 1124: 1115: 1113: 1108: 1102: 1101: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1071: 1070: 1057: 1052: 1046: 1045: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1022: 1016: 1015: 1008: 1004: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 982: 978: 977: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 959: 954: 948: 947: 939: 935: 934: 933: 932: 923: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 906: 901: 895: 894: 887: 883: 882: 881: 880: 877: 873: 872: 866: 863: 860: 856: 852: 848: 847: 843: 839: 834: 828: 827: 819: 818: 817: 816: 813: 808: 806: 805: 800: 792: 782: 777: 771: 770: 763: 762: 761: 760: 757: 753: 750: 749:Baseball Bugs 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 736: 732: 731: 724: 720: 719: 718: 717: 714: 709: 703: 702: 695: 694: 691: 687: 684: 683:Baseball Bugs 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 657: 654: 651: 648: 645: 642: 637: 633: 632: 627: 623: 622: 616: 615: 614: 613: 610: 606: 605: 599: 596: 593: 589: 585: 584: 580: 574: 569: 563: 562: 555: 554: 553: 550: 547: 543: 542: 533: 528: 522: 521: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 500: 497: 496: 491: 484: 483: 478: 474: 470: 467:, related, -- 466: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 454: 449: 443: 442: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 423: 417: 416: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 402: 397: 389: 388: 379: 369: 365: 361: 356: 352: 351: 350: 345: 339: 338: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 320: 316: 312: 307: 303: 302: 301: 300: 293: 289: 284: 283: 282: 281: 274: 273: 272: 271: 265: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 245: 244: 243: 242: 235: 234: 233: 232: 226: 225: 224: 219: 213: 212: 204: 203: 198: 197: 192: 191: 186: 181: 180: 177: 172: 166: 165: 157: 156: 155: 154: 150: 146: 141: 135: 131: 129: 123: 117: 112: 111: 106: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 70: 68: 65: 64: 56: 52: 48: 47: 42: 35: 34: 25: 19: 2731: 2715: 2668: 2661: 2639: 2620:SarahStierch 2612:DC MEETUP 21 2611: 2594: 2591:DC Meetup 21 2561: 2493:Future plans 2432: 2343: 2236: 2220: 2047: 2039: 2007: 2003:Constitution 2001: 1995: 1961: 1927: 1903: 1901: 1878:Gerda Arendt 1850: 1805: 1796: 1771: 1763: 1761: 1750: 1748: 1717: 1700: 1681:Gerda Arendt 1667:Gerda Arendt 1648:Gerda Arendt 1642: 1599:— Preceding 1562: 1556: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1532: 1523: 1505: 1477: 1446: 1384: 1338: 1320: 1297: 1274: 1245: 1219: 1183: 1156: 1129: 1122: 1098: 1083: 1042: 1035: 1012: 1006: 975: 944: 937: 919: 891: 885: 870: 861: 824: 803: 796: 767: 729: 723:Desmond Tutu 699: 673: 667: 661: 655: 649: 643: 620: 603: 594: 559: 518: 486: 469:Gerda Arendt 439: 413: 392: 385: 383: 355:Bigtimepeace 335: 306:Bigtimepeace 209: 184: 162: 140:Bigtimepeace 136: 132: 127: 124: 121: 85: 50: 44: 2716:You should. 2595:You should. 2222:...see more 1817:'filemover' 1697:Re: Hey you 1639:BarkingMoon 1484:bring it up 489:Will Beback 465:this online 395:Will Beback 43:This is an 2464:Zhaladshar 2460:BirgitteSB 2413:H. R. 4982 2390:Wikisource 2383:Fetchcomms 2373:CutOffTies 2363:Fetchcomms 2316:Wikisource 1966:Newsletter 1898:Newsletter 1845:their work 1841:soft touch 1799:PumpkinSky 1765:Happy Hour 1560:block user 1554:filter log 1478:You know, 1281:Hammersoft 793:bits4crats 671:block user 665:filter log 105:Archive 25 97:Archive 21 92:Archive 20 86:Archive 19 80:Archive 18 75:Archive 17 67:Archive 15 2013:barnstar. 1970:July 2011 1785:User:Aude 1566:block log 1277:this diff 1214:Singapore 677:block log 463:I posted 118:Bad words 2718:Really. 2597:Really. 2533:the list 2448:Digipoke 1809:contribs 1704:Pedro J. 1663:one more 1601:unsigned 1536:contribs 1317:Question 865:contribs 647:contribs 598:contribs 588:Dave1184 549:Fatuorum 364:contribs 315:contribs 149:contribs 2740:Dominic 2688:Jenks24 2646:Jenks24 2436:Prosody 2324:WS:NARA 2320:WP:NARA 2311:tumblr. 2287:Ongoing 2031:WP:NARA 2027:Dominic 1910:Dominic 1821:WP:NFCC 1781:AudeBot 1623:carrots 1581:carrots 1419:carrots 1365:carrots 1326:carrots 1212:and on 752:carrots 686:carrots 546:Malleus 46:archive 2462:, and 2029:about 1773:Note: 1661:Found 1474:Family 1172:Ched, 804:MacMed 295:point. 2662:which 2480:Slakr 2470:Tools 2006:, or 811:stalk 16:< 2692:talk 2670:Ched 2650:talk 2624:talk 2616:GLAM 2563:Ched 2297:The 1980:News 1962:The 1929:Ched 1894:The 1882:talk 1852:Ched 1830:talk 1803:talk 1777:here 1719:Ched 1685:talk 1671:talk 1652:talk 1646:, -- 1609:talk 1591:Lady 1548:logs 1530:talk 1507:Ched 1492:talk 1448:Ched 1386:Ched 1340:Ched 1299:Ched 1285:talk 1247:Ched 1220:Dave 1184:Dave 1157:Dave 1131:Ched 1123:Done 1100:Ched 1084:Dave 1044:Ched 1014:Ched 976:Dave 946:Ched 938:very 893:Ched 871:Dave 859:talk 826:Ched 799:this 769:Ched 730:Dave 701:Ched 659:logs 641:talk 621:Dave 604:Dave 592:talk 561:Ched 520:Ched 494:talk 473:talk 441:Ched 415:Ched 400:talk 360:talk 337:Ched 311:talk 288:this 211:Ched 164:Ched 145:talk 1874:DYK 1644:fyi 1595:Rob 1480:she 1275:In 362:| 313:| 185:ANY 147:| 128:and 2694:) 2676:? 2673:: 2652:) 2626:) 2569:? 2566:: 2458:, 2454:, 2450:, 2446:, 2442:, 2438:, 2269:, 2266:, 2263:, 2260:, 2257:, 2254:, 2251:, 2051:: 2000:, 1935:? 1932:: 1884:) 1858:? 1855:: 1832:) 1725:? 1722:: 1687:) 1673:) 1654:) 1625:→ 1611:) 1583:→ 1513:? 1510:: 1494:) 1454:? 1451:: 1421:→ 1392:? 1389:: 1367:→ 1346:? 1343:: 1328:→ 1305:? 1302:: 1287:) 1253:? 1250:: 1137:? 1134:: 1106:? 1103:: 1080:-- 1050:? 1047:: 1039:— 1020:? 1017:: 952:? 949:: 899:? 896:: 832:? 829:: 775:? 772:: 754:→ 726:-- 707:? 704:: 688:→ 567:? 564:: 526:? 523:: 475:) 447:? 444:: 421:? 418:: 358:| 343:? 340:: 309:| 217:? 214:: 170:? 167:: 143:| 101:→ 71:← 2744:t 2742:· 2690:( 2648:( 2622:( 2535:. 2482:) 2478:( 2385:) 2381:( 2375:) 2371:( 2365:) 2361:( 2276:. 2224:. 1914:t 1912:· 1880:( 1828:( 1806:· 1801:( 1683:( 1669:( 1650:( 1607:( 1568:) 1563:· 1557:· 1551:· 1545:· 1539:· 1533:· 1528:( 1490:( 1283:( 862:· 857:( 679:) 674:· 668:· 662:· 656:· 650:· 644:· 639:( 595:· 590:( 471:( 262:" 57:. 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index