Knowledge

User talk:Alexey Muranov

Source 📝

631:) :). So i do not think that a simple or one-sided relation between usual monoids and monoidal categories (like "objects in a strict monoidal category form a monoid") would be a complete justification of the name, despite what Mac Lane writes. I think that notions of a monoid and a monoidal category are complementary: monoidal categories allow to generalize the notion of a usual monoid, and with this more general definition they become monoids themselves in the monoidal category of categories and functors. (Of course one needs to be careful and talk about the category of "small" categories, etc.). -- 499:
double-dutch for all the purpose they would serve. (Do we have a little template thingy that says "Definition needed" like the "citation needed" one?) I have been banging on for some time about the need to be both precise and clear and suitable for the intended audience, the latter not being professional mathematicians, logicans, or philosophers. You then are the best judge of that. If you look at my discussion page, I have a message from a reader who said how clear and helful were the logic articles she had read. That is praise indeed, and more liek that are sought.--Philogo 13:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
1833: 1745: 1657: 1569: 1481: 1210: 1137: 1036: 963: 1281: 430:
able to map it out and have some understanding. The goal of these editors seems to be that it will only be useful and understandable to mathematicians. So can you see why I would be very upset over all of this. I think you need to think about the needs of the whole community over the very limited interests of the math department.
1370:
precision, and the third sentence names the result as 'composite function'. They increase (mildly) in technicality. They usually do it that way in Knowledge. It is a deliberate choice. Your new version of the first sentence is now defining the noun. If it shall stay that way, the following sentences must be adjusted accordingly.
1336:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
714:
A declassified memo exists that informed LBJ on the Monday following the assassination that he had to "convince the people LHO did it and did it alone" and that he was to form a "commission" to appear official avoid prying eyes from Congress or other gov bodies who'd want serious answers and fact. I
429:
Okay, lets take it easy on each other. My goal in creating that article was to cover the concept of "one person has a different interpretation of things than another" Here I am thinking that people of all kinds might be able to benefit from it. Maybe two regular people having a disagreement could be
1425:
I mentioned informal as a description of the style in which it was written before. Style which my edit tried to keep. I am not implying that it strictly has to be that way. What is awkward now is the repetition occurring between the first and second sentence. They are saying the same thing. So, one
1385:
Well, but all of them should be correct and comprehencible anyway, maybe some less precise than the others. My first sentence does not use any technical notation or language, not even domain and range specification, but anything would be fine with me, as long as it is correct (and comprehensible).
657:
For me, that all amounts to roughly the same reason. It seems obvious that monoid objects are called so just because in the monoidal category of sets they are the usual monoids. And monoidal categories are a generalisation of strict monoidal categories. Saying that the latter are the monoid objects
1449:
most about is that the information be correct and comprehensible, whether the style is formal or informal, and whether there is any redundancy or not. Currently, I would prefer to leave it to the others to decide how to deal with it (as long as any misleading or inaccurate statements are avoided).
315:
You haven't told the lay reader who finds this article whether this is supposed to be about, e.g. the building of houses ("structures"), organizations (a church council or a commercial firm is a "structure"), etc. That this is supposed to be about mathematical logic needs to be said in a way that
1448:
Personally, I see no reason to write a paragraph where one sentence would suffice, so shrinking the whole introduction into a one-sentence informal (by mathematical standards) definition would look the most natural to me. However, I am afraid that the others won't agree. Anyway, what i care the
737:
Hi, thanks for the message. I do not have time or desire to follow this issue too closely, maybe i will be just looking to the talk page from time to time. I am trying to use common sense and logic to prevent publishing beliefs worded as facts in Knowledge. The best thing i've come up with is to
614:
The condition is stronger than that, because the "multiplication" also acts on arrows, and is a bifunctor. Mac Lane writes that they are called monoidal because the bifunctor is associative. It is not clear to me if this reason it the official one, but there seem to be a good reason. For example,
1369:
Note that there is now repetition in the second sentence of the same content that you added in the first sentence. Also take into account that 'function composition' can be both a noun and a verb. Before, the sentence was explaining the verb in simple words, then the second sentence in full
498:
The article and other under the logic banner will be sucessful for the intended audience, therefore, if you for instance come to understand the terms you mentione and any other used in the article(s). If you do not unerstand the terms used then we might just as well write the articles in
376:
I know I'm terrible! Can it. I tell you what Hans, I think you are all right in general, but I don't like your style. Furthermore, you and the other mathematicians seem determined to close your minds to covering even the most basic philosophical background for these concepts. That's what
1048:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1222:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1149:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1295:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 510:
Hi, I have undone a change you have made to that article. Please comment if you disagree. Also, what do you mean by “usual monoids are exactly the monoids in the monoidal category of sets with Cartesian product”? What are “the monoids” in a monoidal category? Best regards
1110:
page, I don't know if this was one of your changes, but I assume you must be familiar with the subject. I believe the 6th step of the Algorithm has a typo, but since it would change the algorithm's function I was hoping to get a second opinion. I have noted it on
377:
philosophers call being anti-intellectual and unreflective. If you don't understand something intellectually, you don't understand it AT ALL. At least I am capable of deferring to experts in their own areas. I've been patient with you guys up to now. Step off.
710:
I recently contributed a carefully worded reference to the this issue that was immediately reverted by admin. I reverted it back, not knowing that move would earn me the honor of starting "engaging in a revert war", which clearly was not my intention.
484::) ), and it seems that this is the kind of logic the article/lede is currently about. I also understand the phrase "common-sense logic". The phrase "philosophical logic" evokes some associations, but nothing clear. I will try to be useful however. -- 975:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
574:, which satisfy the usual laws for the usual monoids, but expressed purely in terms of arrows. What do you think about this as a reason to call the category monoidal? I do not know the true historical explanation of the name -- 1394:
at what point? If the first function is from reals to reals, its application can only produce a real, not another function, etc. I do not see a point to not define something directly in the first sentence if you easily can.
918:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1878: 1790: 1700: 1612: 1524: 1250: 1177: 1076: 1003: 1452:
What can be said in defence of the current situation, is that the second sentence is more detailed and formal than the first one, and it uses the technical notation for function's domain and codomain. --
1862:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1774:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1684:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1596:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1508:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1234:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1161:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1060:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 987:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 718:
I totally agree with what you've written. The facts are truly there, but they are "inconvenient" facts and stray from the urban myth which is the parroting of gov provided untruths. What can we do?
658:
in the monoidal category of categories is, when taking the motivation for the term “monoid object” into account, about the same as saying that their objects form a monoid, with morphism filled in
355:
I am very glad to see that we have a new active model theory editor. I am sorry that you have run into Gregbard with your first mathematical article – but then, this kind of encounter adds the
1411:
How about something along the lines of: "function composition is an operation that takes two functions and produces a new one by connecting the input of one to the output of the other"? --
1847: 1759: 1670: 1582: 1494: 592:
Interesting, thanks for the clarification. I was assuming that they are called monoidal categories because, well, the objects of a strict monoidal category actually form a monoid … —
407:
too.) I will respond here to one of the questions/assertions you made elsewhere, and hope that you will be able to answer the others yourself. Here we go: I did not try to
39: 857: 824: 303: 283: 480:
is, and i am familiar with some basics of it. I can think of a few non-mathematical interpretations of Mathematical Logic (yet another meaning of
47: 460:
and make any comments at new section at end of 50 pages of discussion. Bless,--Philogo 00:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)--Philogo 00:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
198: 1304: 1901: 1813: 1723: 1634: 1546: 1264: 1191: 1090: 1017: 943: 746:. I am not even interested in fighting for the truth (which we may never know) as long as beliefs are not stated as facts in Knowledge. -- 56:
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
216: 53: 1897: 1809: 1719: 1630: 1542: 1260: 1187: 1086: 1013: 939: 760:
Thanks. I understand. I found the official memo and source and have inserted the info which is not "belief", but rather fact.
331:
You are absolutely right, can you do it for me, please? :) The only thing i can say in my defence is that i did link the word
1296: 332: 306: 263: 131: 149: 684:
I agree with the change, i think i was trying to explain what a "natural isomorphism" is, but this is a bit off topic. --
1871: 1783: 1693: 1605: 1517: 1312: 1243: 1170: 1069: 996: 108: 930:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1883: 1795: 1705: 1617: 1529: 1316: 1255: 1182: 1081: 1008: 935: 776: 1112: 1431: 1375: 221: 1324: 154: 738:
make a reference request at least. It is not possible to argue with anything when the person you talk to cites
1390:
is not comprehensible even for a mathematician (assuming he does not know already what is being defined). The
1388:
function composition is the application of one function to the result of another to produce a third function
321: 1329: 1308: 1307:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
1292: 1288: 872: 465: 457: 178: 103: 98: 1859: 1771: 1681: 1593: 1505: 1427: 1371: 1353: 1231: 1158: 1107: 1057: 984: 546:
monoidal category, that is the natural isomorphisms in the definition are identities. Then a monoid in
1363: 764: 404: 364: 360: 183: 1453: 1412: 1396: 1300: 931: 883: 662:. But that statement is a bit vague, of course, so I take your phrasing for the best explanation. — 227: 188: 526:
Hello Quilbert, I am following "Categories for Working Mathematician" by Saunders Mac Lane. Let
667: 597: 516: 435: 382: 317: 233: 126: 768: 722: 1841: 1753: 1664: 1576: 1488: 1218: 1145: 1120: 1044: 971: 953: 907: 898: 868: 800: 751: 689: 636: 579: 504: 489: 420: 340: 1890: 1855: 1802: 1767: 1712: 1677: 1624: 1589: 1536: 1501: 1350: 1227: 1154: 1053: 980: 927: 911: 57: 1870:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1782:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1692:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1604:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1516:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1242:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1169:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1068:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 995:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 926:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1124: 772: 726: 476:
is. I am only somewhat familiar with common layman usage of these words. I only know what
863:-line; this is a very sensible notation. But you didn't change all of the instances, so 829: 1867: 1779: 1689: 1601: 1513: 1333: 1239: 1166: 1065: 992: 923: 915: 806: 534:
category it would be the cartesian product). To simplify the definition of a monoid in
288: 268: 1863: 1775: 1685: 1597: 1509: 1345: 1235: 1162: 1061: 988: 919: 663: 593: 512: 431: 400: 378: 193: 64: 464:
I would like to give a short disclaimer first. I cannot really judge if the lede or
1116: 747: 743: 739: 685: 632: 575: 485: 416: 336: 1832: 1744: 1656: 1568: 1480: 1209: 1136: 1035: 962: 17: 1341:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 1303:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
1280: 1905: 1817: 1727: 1638: 1550: 1461: 1435: 1420: 1404: 1379: 1356: 1268: 1195: 1094: 1021: 947: 891: 876: 780: 755: 730: 693: 671: 640: 601: 583: 520: 493: 439: 424: 386: 368: 344: 325: 72: 1874:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1786:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1696:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1608:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1520:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1246:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1173:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1072:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
999:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
615:
with the "general" definition of a monoid (in a monoidal category), the
1851:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1763:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1674:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1586:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1498:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
52: 1348:, you do not revert back when you yourself have already been reverted. 356: 914:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1887:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1799:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1709:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1621:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1533:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1877:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1845:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1789:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1757:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1699:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1611:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1523:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
1332:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 1249:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1176:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1075:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1002:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1668:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
1580:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
715:
will search the reference and try to get a direct link to it.
60:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. 1279: 721:
Thanks for reading this, and thanks in advance for a reply.
707:
I just saw your post to the "accused or alleged" section.
1106:
Hi! I noticed you made some of the recent changes to the
1492:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1858:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1770:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1680:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1592:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1504:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1230:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1157:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1056:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
983:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
864: 796: 256:
The following is a really bad way to start an article:
1323:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
832: 809: 359:
dimension to Knowledge that makes it so addictive. --
291: 271: 1315:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 316:the non-mathematician will understand immediately. 851: 818: 530:be a monoidal category with multiplication * (for 297: 277: 906:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1299:to work toward making a version that represents 742:and the link directs not to the sources, but to 1339:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 411:--- my main (and maybe even only?) goal was to 403:, thanks for visiting my User Page. (Thanks to 165: 85: 30: 8: 859:’ when it refers to Lebesgue measure on the 468:is good, because i do not know neither what 1291:shows that you are currently engaged in an 1651: 1563: 1475: 791:Differential notation for Lebesgue measure 844: 833: 831: 808: 290: 270: 1216:Hello, Alexey Muranov. Voting in the 1143:Hello, Alexey Muranov. Voting in the 1042:Hello, Alexey Muranov. Voting in the 969:Hello, Alexey Muranov. Voting in the 7: 1842:2023 Arbitration Committee elections 1754:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 1665:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 1577:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 1489:2019 Arbitration Committee elections 1219:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 1146:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 1045:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 972:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1826:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message 1738:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 1648:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 1560:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 1472:ArbCom 2019 election voter message 1203:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 1130:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 1102:Question with Dijkstra's Algorithm 1029:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 335:, so the reader had a chance... -- 25: 932:review the candidates' statements 1831: 1743: 1655: 1567: 1479: 1208: 1135: 1034: 961: 51: 1881:and submit your choices on the 1793:and submit your choices on the 1703:and submit your choices on the 1615:and submit your choices on the 1527:and submit your choices on the 1328:—especially if you violate the 1287:Your recent editing history at 1253:and submit your choices on the 1180:and submit your choices on the 1079:and submit your choices on the 938:. For the Election committee, 908:Arbitration Committee election 899:ArbCom elections are now open! 845: 834: 554:together with a two arrows to 1: 1906:00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 1860:Knowledge arbitration process 1818:00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 1772:Knowledge arbitration process 1728:00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1682:Knowledge arbitration process 1639:01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 1594:Knowledge arbitration process 1551:00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC) 1506:Knowledge arbitration process 1357:21:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC) 1269:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1232:Knowledge arbitration process 1196:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 1159:Knowledge arbitration process 1125:06:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC) 1058:Knowledge arbitration process 1022:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 985:Knowledge arbitration process 948:13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 781:16:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 756:15:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 740:good, solid, reliable sources 731:14:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC) 104:The five pillars of Knowledge 81: 73:20:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 26: 1462:15:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 1436:15:29, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 1421:04:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 1405:04:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 1380:22:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 1095:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 48:sign your name on talk pages 1006:and submit your choices on 934:and submit your choices on 456:Please look at new lede of 199:New contributors' help page 1924: 1898:MediaWiki message delivery 1810:MediaWiki message delivery 1720:MediaWiki message delivery 1631:MediaWiki message delivery 1543:MediaWiki message delivery 1261:MediaWiki message delivery 1188:MediaWiki message delivery 1087:MediaWiki message delivery 1014:MediaWiki message delivery 1004:the candidates' statements 940:MediaWiki message delivery 892:19:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 877:19:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC) 694:12:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 672:18:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 641:07:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 617:strict monoidal categories 602:23:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 584:12:00, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 538:, let me assume here that 521:11:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC) 345:13:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 326:13:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 179:Frequently asked questions 1101: 217:Contributing to Knowledge 150:How to develop an article 1895:to your user talk page. 1807:to your user talk page. 1717:to your user talk page. 1629:to your user talk page. 1541:to your user talk page. 1457: 1426:of them is unnecessary. 1416: 1400: 887: 570:and an identity 1 -: --> 305:, possibly of different 494:11:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 440:10:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 425:10:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 387:09:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 369:17:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 252:Initial context setting 189:Where to ask a question 118:Finding your way around 1386:The previous version " 1289:Euler totient function 1284: 853: 820: 625:category of categories 466:Interpretation (logic) 458:interpretation (logic) 452:Interpretation (logic) 299: 279: 1856:Arbitration Committee 1839:Hello! Voting in the 1768:Arbitration Committee 1751:Hello! Voting in the 1678:Arbitration Committee 1662:Hello! Voting in the 1590:Arbitration Committee 1574:Hello! Voting in the 1502:Arbitration Committee 1486:Hello! Voting in the 1283: 1228:Arbitration Committee 1155:Arbitration Committee 1054:Arbitration Committee 981:Arbitration Committee 954:ArbCom Elections 2016 912:Arbitration Committee 854: 821: 629:product of categories 627:(with respect to the 300: 280: 40:Welcome to Knowledge! 1364:function composition 1325:blocked from editing 1108:Dijkstra's algorithm 852:{\displaystyle |dx|} 830: 807: 289: 269: 132:Department directory 916:arbitration process 558:: a multiplication 228:Knowledge etiquette 46:Please remember to 36:Hello Cokaban, and 1872:arbitration policy 1784:arbitration policy 1694:arbitration policy 1606:arbitration policy 1518:arbitration policy 1313:dispute resolution 1285: 1244:arbitration policy 1171:arbitration policy 1070:arbitration policy 997:arbitration policy 956:: Voting now open! 928:arbitration policy 849: 819:{\displaystyle dx} 816: 478:Mathematical Logic 295: 275: 109:How to edit a page 58:edit summary field 1908: 1820: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1645: 1644: 1557: 1556: 1330:three-revert rule 801:Differential form 784: 767:comment added by 505:Monoidal category 432:Pontiff Greg Bard 413:get trough to you 401:Pontiff Greg Bard 379:Pontiff Greg Bard 298:{\displaystyle N} 278:{\displaystyle M} 249: 248: 245: 244: 241: 240: 162: 161: 127:Table of contents 80: 79: 18:User talk:Cokaban 16:(Redirected from 1915: 1896: 1894: 1835: 1808: 1806: 1747: 1718: 1716: 1659: 1652: 1628: 1571: 1564: 1540: 1483: 1476: 1428:Cactus0192837465 1372:Cactus0192837465 1212: 1139: 1038: 965: 858: 856: 855: 850: 848: 837: 825: 823: 822: 817: 783: 761: 660:in a natural way 623:in the monoidal 304: 302: 301: 296: 284: 282: 281: 276: 222:Community Portal 208:How you can help 166: 141:Editing articles 86: 82: 69: 55: 31: 27: 21: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1888: 1836: 1828: 1823: 1822: 1800: 1748: 1740: 1710: 1650: 1622: 1562: 1534: 1474: 1367: 1317:page protection 1278: 1273: 1272: 1213: 1205: 1200: 1199: 1140: 1132: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1039: 1031: 1026: 1025: 1009:the voting page 966: 958: 936:the voting page 902: 828: 827: 805: 804: 793: 762: 702: 508: 454: 353: 287: 286: 267: 266: 254: 209: 171: 155:Manual of Style 142: 119: 91: 90:Getting started 76: 67: 63:Happy editing! 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1921: 1919: 1879:the candidates 1848:eligible users 1837: 1830: 1829: 1827: 1824: 1791:the candidates 1760:eligible users 1749: 1742: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1701:the candidates 1671:eligible users 1660: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1613:the candidates 1583:eligible users 1572: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1525:the candidates 1495:eligible users 1484: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1454:Alexey Muranov 1450: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1413:Alexey Muranov 1408: 1407: 1397:Alexey Muranov 1366: 1360: 1342: 1277: 1274: 1251:the candidates 1214: 1207: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1178:the candidates 1141: 1134: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1103: 1100: 1077:the candidates 1040: 1033: 1032: 1030: 1027: 967: 960: 959: 957: 951: 905: 901: 896: 895: 894: 884:Alexey Muranov 847: 843: 840: 836: 815: 812: 792: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 701: 698: 697: 696: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 607: 606: 605: 604: 587: 586: 507: 502: 501: 500: 496: 482:interpretation 453: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 392: 391: 390: 389: 352: 349: 348: 347: 313: 312: 311: 310: 294: 274: 253: 250: 247: 246: 243: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 230: 224: 219: 211: 210: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 196: 191: 186: 181: 173: 172: 169: 163: 160: 159: 158: 157: 152: 144: 143: 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 129: 121: 120: 117: 114: 113: 112: 111: 106: 101: 93: 92: 89: 78: 77: 34: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1920: 1909: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1892: 1886: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1844: 1843: 1834: 1825: 1821: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1798: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1756: 1755: 1746: 1737: 1731: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1714: 1708: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1673: 1672: 1667: 1666: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1647: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1626: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1573: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1559: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1497: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1471: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1365: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1340: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1282: 1276:December 2018 1275: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1252: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1211: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1174: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1138: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113:the talk page 1109: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1083: 1078: 1073: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1037: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1000: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 977: 974: 973: 964: 955: 952: 950: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 900: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880: 879: 878: 874: 870: 867:some more. — 866: 862: 841: 838: 813: 810: 802: 798: 795:I agree with 790: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 759: 758: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 736: 735: 734: 732: 728: 724: 719: 716: 712: 708: 705: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 682: 673: 669: 665: 661: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 603: 599: 595: 591: 590: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 550:is an object 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 524: 523: 522: 518: 514: 506: 503: 497: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 472:is, nor what 471: 467: 463: 462: 461: 459: 451: 441: 437: 433: 428: 427: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 388: 384: 380: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 366: 362: 358: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 318:Michael Hardy 308: 292: 272: 265: 262:Consider two 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 251: 235: 231: 229: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 206: 205: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 185: 182: 180: 177: 176: 175: 174: 168: 167: 164: 156: 153: 151: 148: 147: 146: 145: 139: 138: 133: 130: 128: 125: 124: 123: 122: 116: 115: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 96: 95: 94: 88: 87: 84: 83: 75: 74: 71: 70: 61: 59: 54: 49: 44: 43: 42: 41: 33: 32: 29: 28: 19: 1882: 1876: 1853: 1846: 1840: 1838: 1794: 1788: 1765: 1758: 1752: 1750: 1704: 1698: 1675: 1669: 1663: 1616: 1610: 1587: 1581: 1575: 1528: 1522: 1499: 1493: 1487: 1391: 1387: 1368: 1343: 1338: 1322: 1321: 1286: 1254: 1248: 1225: 1217: 1215: 1181: 1175: 1152: 1144: 1142: 1105: 1080: 1074: 1051: 1043: 1041: 1007: 1001: 978: 970: 968: 903: 869:Toby Bartels 860: 794: 763:— Preceding 720: 717: 713: 709: 706: 704:Hi Cokaban. 703: 659: 628: 624: 620: 616: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 509: 481: 477: 473: 469: 455: 412: 408: 354: 314: 255: 170:Getting help 99:Introduction 65: 62: 50:by clicking 45: 38: 37: 35: 1884:voting page 1796:voting page 1706:voting page 1618:voting page 1530:voting page 1351:Jasper Deng 1309:noticeboard 1256:voting page 1183:voting page 1082:voting page 409:beat you up 1868:topic bans 1780:topic bans 1690:topic bans 1602:topic bans 1514:topic bans 1240:topic bans 1167:topic bans 1066:topic bans 993:topic bans 924:topic bans 882:Thanks. -- 803:changing ‘ 700:Mediation? 474:Philosophy 405:Hans Adler 361:Hans Adler 307:signatures 264:structures 194:Help pages 184:Cheatsheet 1864:site bans 1776:site bans 1686:site bans 1598:site bans 1510:site bans 1301:consensus 1297:talk page 1236:site bans 1163:site bans 1062:site bans 989:site bans 920:site bans 797:your edit 333:structure 232:Practice 1362:Lead of 1337:warring— 1311:or seek 1293:edit war 865:I edited 777:contribs 765:unsigned 664:Quilbert 594:Quilbert 513:Quilbert 234:civility 1891:NoACEMM 1803:NoACEMM 1713:NoACEMM 1625:NoACEMM 1537:NoACEMM 1334:reverts 1117:Botlord 748:Cokaban 686:Cokaban 633:Cokaban 621:monoids 576:Cokaban 486:Cokaban 417:Cokaban 337:Cokaban 226:Follow 1392:result 1354:(talk) 1346:WP:BRD 910:. The 826:’ to ‘ 733:4eyes 566:-: --> 544:strict 399:Hello 357:MMORPG 769:4eyes 744:WP:RS 723:4eyes 542:is a 470:Logic 351:Hello 68:Tucky 1902:talk 1854:The 1814:talk 1766:The 1724:talk 1676:The 1635:talk 1588:The 1547:talk 1500:The 1458:talk 1432:talk 1417:talk 1401:talk 1376:talk 1344:Per 1265:talk 1226:The 1192:talk 1153:The 1121:talk 1091:talk 1052:The 1018:talk 979:The 944:talk 888:talk 873:talk 773:talk 752:talk 727:talk 690:talk 668:talk 637:talk 619:are 598:talk 580:talk 517:talk 490:talk 436:talk 421:talk 415:. -- 383:talk 365:talk 341:talk 322:talk 285:and 1319:. 1305:BRD 904:Hi, 799:to 532:Set 66:Van 1904:) 1893:}} 1889:{{ 1866:, 1816:) 1805:}} 1801:{{ 1778:, 1726:) 1715:}} 1711:{{ 1688:, 1637:) 1627:}} 1623:{{ 1600:, 1549:) 1539:}} 1535:{{ 1512:, 1460:) 1434:) 1419:) 1403:) 1395:-- 1378:) 1267:) 1259:. 1238:, 1194:) 1186:. 1165:, 1123:) 1115:. 1093:) 1085:. 1064:, 1020:) 1012:. 991:, 946:) 922:, 890:) 875:) 779:) 775:• 754:) 729:) 692:) 670:) 639:) 600:) 582:) 519:) 492:) 438:) 423:) 385:) 367:) 343:) 324:) 1900:( 1812:( 1722:( 1633:( 1545:( 1456:( 1430:( 1415:( 1399:( 1374:( 1263:( 1190:( 1119:( 1089:( 1016:( 942:( 886:( 871:( 861:x 846:| 842:x 839:d 835:| 814:x 811:d 771:( 750:( 725:( 688:( 666:( 635:( 596:( 578:( 572:m 568:m 564:m 562:* 560:m 556:m 552:m 548:M 540:M 536:M 528:M 515:( 511:— 488:( 434:( 419:( 381:( 363:( 339:( 320:( 309:. 293:N 273:M 20:)

Index

User talk:Cokaban
Welcome to Knowledge!
sign your name on talk pages

edit summary field
VanTucky
20:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Introduction
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Table of contents
Department directory
How to develop an article
Manual of Style
Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page
Contributing to Knowledge
Community Portal
Knowledge etiquette
civility
structures
signatures
Michael Hardy
talk
13:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
structure
Cokaban

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑