95:
140:
does not say we use the original style but that we shouldn't change the established style without discussion, and the era style was changed in 2009. Whether or not that was done by discussion or simply accepted by lack of anyone wishing to change it is irrelevant, it's clearly the established style.
171:"Established" is your opinion, Mr Weller, whereas I can say that that the style was changed without reasons and without discussion either. There is no set time limit for fixing the era style, nor is it irrelevant that the policy is ignored. That is your POV which you are attempting to force on me.--
221:
I would have thought that carrying out edits that are contrary to most of the comments in that discussion is grounds for valid complaint, Mojo_ especially after leaving such a gap in time, presumably to reduce the level of opposition. Approach has been
202:. I moved it on 6 February 2018, several months after the discussion petered out. Today, 118 days after the last comment in that discussion, you move it back? WTF? If that's your aproach to
194:
that "someone" moved the page to "make an era change in the title (without raising a discussion)" quite disingenuous and offensive. The discussion and consensus for the move to
156:
I agree on that with you not the above; it's clearly not the established style or not in any way clear that your opposing viewpoint is correct (unless muddy ponds are clear).--
26:
25:
107:
199:
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
223:
157:
195:
227:
161:
73:
191:
106:
for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. You can read more about the reasons for this
147:
111:
211:
203:
172:
57:
50:
40:
115:
142:
207:
137:
99:
103:
94:
231:
215:
180:
165:
150:
127:
119:
102:. Please note that per long-standing consensus, IMDb does not meet the
98:
I noticed that you recently used IMDB as a source for information in a
200:
Talk:Siege of
Jerusalem (70 CE)/Archive 1#Title of this article
45:
68:
17:CouncilConnect, you are invited to the Teahouse!
8:
206:you're going to have a difficult time here.
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
7:
14:
93:
24:
192:very dishonest characterization
128:21:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
166:16:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
151:12:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
181:14:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
79:16:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
55:
89:The use of IMDb as a source
248:
232:13:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
216:20:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
196:Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE)
104:reliable sourcing criteria
63:We hope to see you there!
22:
176:
133:Changed era styles
58:Visit the Teahouse
100:biography article
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:on behalf of the
239:
145:
125:
97:
78:
71:
65:
60:
48:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
247:
246:
242:
241:
240:
238:
237:
236:
188:
143:
135:
120:
118:. Thank you, --
91:
82:
81:
67:
61:
56:
44:
19:
12:
11:
5:
245:
243:
235:
234:
224:154.59.156.125
187:
184:
173:CouncilConnect
169:
168:
158:193.62.184.163
134:
131:
90:
87:
84:
83:
74:Teahouse hosts
62:
38:
35:CouncilConnect
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
244:
233:
229:
225:
222:misspelled.--
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
185:
183:
182:
178:
174:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
139:
132:
130:
129:
126:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
88:
77:
75:
70:
66:Delivered by
59:
54:
52:
47:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
204:WP:CONSENSUS
190:I find your
189:
170:
136:
122:
92:
64:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
198:is here at
144:Doug Weller
208:Mojoworker
121:Jezebel's
141:Thanks.
46:Missvain
69:HostBot
138:WP:ERA
123:Ponyo
228:talk
212:talk
186:WTF?
177:talk
162:talk
148:talk
116:here
114:and
112:here
108:here
51:talk
53:).
33:Hi
230:)
214:)
179:)
164:)
110:,
226:(
210:(
175:(
160:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
