User talk:DGG/Archive 136 May 2018

1346:

requests, is incontrovertible, as is the fact that this is a piece of recidivism, of the same kind of disruptive behaviour that previously got him sanctioned at Arbcom. Given his history, your assertion that "3 or 4 copyvios spread out of 11 years" is "not a particularly terrible record" is bizarre. You could have said this about some confused newbie, but for an experienced editor like this, obviously, there is only one count of copyvios that is "not terrible", and that is: precisely zero. – Finally, I also take offense at your description of me as an editor "quarreling" with this person. As you should have realized, I have never interacted with him in anything but a legitimate administrative capacity, and, needless to say, I will continue to do so whenever I choose. Your description comes quite close to a veiled insinuation of admin misconduct on my part, which I do not take lightly to. You'd better either retract it, or substantiate it.

1994:. Now this user states on his user page that he is a follower of Meher Baba. Since there is no organization sanctioning Baba followers, this is much like one saying I am a follower of Plato or Aristotle. Yet there is a COI warning that this user should not edit Baba related articles. Much of the logic used is that all these articles are promo spam and therefore a Baba follower should "refrain from pursuing promotional activities over here" or one may be banned or topic restricted. Now this is equivalent to credo policing. I may laugh, but it also has to be acted upon and I am not sure what is best to do. Simply "call in an admin"? How does one stop such a COI claim? Reason with persons who simply sees "cult cruft" at the sound of Meher Baba? I tried but all I got is "sources please" (period). I do not state I am a Baba follower, but if I do? Why should I then be exempt from editing these articles? Isn't this credo policing? Thank you. 3338:, and was asked to ask you, with the comment that Legacypac thinks that I am trying to get them sanctioned. (At least I think they were implying that I and others are trying to get them sanctioned.) I know that I am not trying to get Legacypac sanctioned, but am asking them to explain a position that they repeatedly express that I am unable to understand or agree with. So: Do you think that sometimes drafts should be promoted, or moved from draft space to article space, in order to open up a mainspace deletion discussion? What is your view? I am not asking what Legacypac thinks. Only Legacypac can explain, and after their unfortunate short-term de-reviewing, they are in a bad mood. If you explain, thank you. If you disagree, thank you for explaining. If you would prefer not to discuss this issue, I will let it drop. 3487:. If I see a draft resubmitted as is or essentially as is without addressing the comments, and without an explanation of why it is being resubmitted, I will not only decline but caution the contributor. Some contributors will resubmit over and over again without material changes (which often winds up at MFD - I would like to be able to report this as a conduct issue). Second, what do you mean about some contributors think we do that? I know that some contributors expect that a reviewer will follow a draft through the review process. I try to be diplomatic with them and get other reviewers to comment. Third, I don't know of any reviewer who insists on being the only person to handle a particular draft. 4357:(1) In reviewing this article, what I noticed first was the obviously incorrect name of the department; this sort of error is a warning signal to look at the original sources myself. This led me to the apparent vagueness and over-expansiveness of the claims; that's a common indication of careless promotional writing. PR staff, even in academic institutions, tend not to be concerned with getting that sort of detail correct. Because of this, in the absence fo a formal CV it can be quite difficult to verify the details. This does not necessarily indicate an actual conflict of interest, because PR writing so pervades the world that many beginners here tend to fall into a similar style. 4366:(4) There is a frequent tendency in Knowledge (XXG) to emphasise the current interests of a person as they themselves describe them--they not unreasonably want to write about what they are currently interested in. But WP is an encyclopedia , and must treat their career as a whole. Sometimes what fascinates a person in their later career is not what the major real contribution is. Sometimes it is otherwise. Here it seems to be a mixture: their recent "neuroscience" work is too trivial to mention, but the current high administrative position in the Church of England is probably of greater importance than their earlier authorship and consulting. 2151:-- The other third-party citation I included in the neuroscience field was on the "Poisson surprise test." It is from Gourévitch and Eggermont (2007) which offers a critique of the test (which I mention in the new Knowledge (XXG) draft), but puts that in perspective in the Abstract, which states that "the Poisson-surprise (PS) method has been widely used for 20 years"; and in the "Discussion" section, which states: "The PS method ... has been the most widely used method of burst detection ..." 3410:, are talking about possibly asking ArbCom to desysop an admin. Do you mean Primefac? What for? Did I miss the new policy that states that admins must be perfect, and that admins who make mistakes and admit to them must be desysopped? I wouldn't advise Legacypac requesting an ArbCom case, because their own conduct, including a two-year tilt at windmills to clean up draft space by moving crud to anywhere including article space, might be considered. 2845:, and to score all pages in the feed with copyvio and quality scores. The idea is that this will help both AfC and NPP reviewers prioritize pages that need attention soonest. Adding copyvio indications to all pages in the feed is presenting unexpected technical challenges, and the WMF engineers could definitely use opinions from people who are experienced with copyvio. It would be a big help to our effort if you could take a look at 3543:

makes a difference; sometimes I get ignored or challenged. As with similar situations at CSD or OTRS. I am very reluctant to really take issue with anyone whom I know to be stubborn, and even more reluctant to follow to the conclusion. I could easily spend all my time here on this, and although it might help WP, it would not help my own mental equilibrium. If it were a regular system of review or audit, it would be less personal.

1237: 2145:-- In regard to helicons, the most complimentary third-party comment I can mention is from Boswell, the man whose discoveries changed the helicon phenomenon from an obscure little footnote to plasma physics into a veritable goldmine. The "Boswell 1970" reference (in its "Preface to the internet edition" section, dated August 2004) includes the sentence: "Charles Legendy, one of the real pioneers of the helicon game, has..." 3456:

not a bare 51%). But such numbers give a false impression of precision: decisions at AfD are inconsistent and unpredictable. In borderline cases, it may be impossible to really give a prediction, and the only way to find out may be to take it there and see. I've done it myself in some cases where there seemed no consistent practice, or an unusual question. But just doing it to get the content deleted is not a good idea.

3334:. At least, that is what I think they are saying. I haven't actually seen them do that, and maybe there is ancient history that I don't understand. I think that moving a draft to article space that one thinks should be deleted is a terrible idea, and that the place for a page of questionable merit is draft space. In any case, I just tried to ask Legacypac, again, about these statements, this time with regard to 4226: 3529:

Knowledge (XXG) works that way: for email inquiries and complaints and requests for pages, the same OTRS agent follows the entire case unless they unlock it. The OTRS agents are by and large more experienced than the AfC reviewers, and make fewer mistakes. But I have seen the same sort of bad advice in both places, and the standard OTRS messages are even more nonspecific and unhelpful than the AfC ones.

1902: 3901:, which is considered a newspaper of record, have a policy that they will publish a true news obituary for any long-term resident of the area of the newspaper. (A long paid death notice that reads like an obituary is a different matter, but your question has to do with true obituaries under the byline of one of the obituary staff reporters.) Therefore a news obituary in the Washington Post is 3642:, which is considered a newspaper of record, have a policy that they will publish a true news obituary for any long-term resident of the area of the newspaper. (A long paid death notice that reads like an obituary is a different matter, but your question has to do with true obituaries under the byline of one of the obituary staff reporters.) Therefore a news obituary in the Washington Post is 4151: 3460:

their chances and it isn't a speedy candidate, the simplest thing to do is to let them try. A delete at AfD will discourage improper re-creation. There are many good articles that were deleted that shouldn't have been, and many foolish ones that shouldn't have been allowed to stay--it is rarely productive to spend too much individual of community energy in arguing about a single article.

1152: 4217:. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help. 3366:. I have seen that you, Legacypac, have been a tilt at windmills for two years to the effect that drafts should sometimes be moved into article space to be deleted (as opposed to being moved into article space because they are article-ready, on which we all agree). I would be interested in any supporting opinion. It might not persuade me, but I plan to listen and consider. 1121: 2139:(3) I moved away from the discussion of individual papers, and grouped the research-related sections by subject matter, with the published papers only cited where they were relevant for supporting various statements. In the process, I greatly shortened the text and left out a few of the research items that I thought were less interesting to the readers. -- 1919: 2923:

for instance, a page is "likely B-class", as opposed to just "B-class". And in terms of the accompanying documentation for how to use the new features, I'm hoping the reviewing community (as opposed to the WMF team) leads the way on the language there, so that no consensus standards are changed. In general, we're going to be careful to only

4360:(2) All of the descriptions of a person in their lecture announcements and the like sre normally written by their publicity team or copied from their own statements. They never have third-party authority, no matter where reprinted. The extremely close similarity of them all demonstrates their common origin. 2421:. It is, IMO, out of date. I have had to apply for a Norwich Pharmacal order before now, and in the application I had to show evidence that the person had likely committed an offence. This was one of the two for which I provided evidence, the other was Section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 4334:

Hi, firstly many thinks for taking the time to look over the Eve Poole page. It’s my first one and quite a learning curve but I’m enjoying it and hoping to do more in the future. I hope I’m doing the right thing here (I'm new to Talking!), I added some discussion points to the Eve Poole Talk page and

2051:

Hi DGG, I would like to take the next step towards re-opening the Genesis Mining stub. Please see our previous discussion from 5th February 2018. As you recommended, we have created an article about the company and I would really appreciate it if you could take a look at it in my colleague’s sandbox:

4493:

If it’s OK, I also moved one other paragraph (the one beginning with “One property of the waves..”), because without it the next paragraph (“The practical significance..”) does not make sense. And in the place where that paragraph was I did not leave a void, but left some of the “surface mode” text

4024:

and following up to my comment and that of DGG: There may be three types of death reports in a newspaper, and one should be mindful of the distinctions. The first is a news obituary, which is written by a reporter, and is not paid for. Different newspapers have different policies on who qualifies

3765:

3482:

You wrote: "If a contributor objects to a particular reviewers interpretation, they can submit it again for someone else to review (no reviewer should insist on being the only person to handle a particular AfC--though some contributors seem to think we do that)." I agree, but will comment. First,

2922:

To address what you wrote: I'm glad to hear that the changes make good sense at a high level. I totally understand the point about using the scores as a guide and not a substitute for human judgment. As we add things to the interface, we'll be careful to write the language such that it's clear that,

2868:

My general view depends on the way it is set up, and I like the new basic arrangement : NPP and AFC are two separate processes, and setting it up as a toggle to choose one or the other is practical way of dealing with it; the reviewer one can concentrate on one process at a time, and avoid confusion

2719:

2171:

Most of the material in the physics section should be moved to the article on helicons, leaving just the work he did himself; as for the neuroscience , it is necessary to separate his notable work (as judged by citations) from his miscellaneous work, instead of treating it all similarly. I will see

3977:

Yes, but the distinction is that the NYT and the Times are so reliable as to be sufficient by themselves without needing other sources. As for the others, as I said, I'm not familiar enough to know if they fall in this category. And for the US, a local paper regardless of format is I think usually

3718:

2283:

I do not consider them appropriate. The first two should go back to draft space, but the third, a particularly absurd so-called micronation, might perhaps be considered for speedy as nonsense. I am not sure about the best approach for doing this. And I am not at all sure about the more important

1989:

Hi DGG, from the few administrators I have come across, you are the only active one I can think of who could advice me on this. There is an onging attempt to purge Knowledge (XXG) of Baba related articles. Given the scarcity of reliable independent sources some may have to go. My concern however is

3536:

When a review is completely wrong, and the submitter is experienced enough to know that, it can make sense to resubmit unchanged, though anyone with some degree of subtlety will make at least some changes. I have however certainly seen people resubmit impossibly unacceptable material unchanged, on

3455:

There are some instances where it makes sense to take a questionable draft to mainspace and discuss it in an AfD. The standard for acceptance of a draft is officially that it is likely to pass AfD (though I and almost everyone else now considers "likely" to be somewhere in the range of 66 to 90%,

3168:

has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do

2885:

Personally, I can adjust to patrolling using whatever is available --I do not expect everything to match my own idiosyncratic pattern. The main thing I am concerned about is to make sure we do not lose important features (what that primarily means to me is that I need to be able to continue to use

2255:

inapplicable speedy deletion requests by the user who made these three. I am wondering if perhaps they slipped through the cracks. However, G4 does have the vague "but not simply to circumvent Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy" clause. If you do not mind looking, what do you think in regard to the

1665:

to hire them. Note that their unwillingness to hire them may be slight or may be strong. This is only the percentage that have an unwillingness to hire someone because they are a member of this group. I do not have the time right now to do a breakdown by being slightly, moderately or strongly more

4444:

I see it lists the control numbers of various national libraries. It is routine practice in libraries to include whatever identifiers are available, in order to make sure that the record can be found under any possible search. If this produces duplication, it doesno harm. If they do not agree, it

3542:

Ideally, we when we encounter a previous bad review, we would follow it up with the reviewer. This is fairly easy to do with beginners at it, but much harder with those who have experience and have been doing it wrong consistently. I do sometimes, and try to word it as a suggestion. Sometimes, it

3459:

If a contributor objects to a particular reviewers interpretation, they can submit it again for someone else to review (no reviewer should insist on being the only person to handle a particular AfC--though some contributors seem to think we do that ). And of course if someone insists on taking

3450:

How to deal with unsatisfactory AfC drafts is somewhat disputed. My opinion on the current situation is that the general mechanism for removing them is of course MfD. If there is dissatisfaction with a particular MfD decision, there's Deletion Review. If there's a feeling that MfD discussions in

4497:

If it’s all right, I also added to the “Legéndy is best known for..” paragraph (at the beginning of the article) that helicons are also used in nuclear fusion reactors and in space propulsion. Both of these items have now been moved to the “Helicons” article, and yet they are also a legitimate

3528:

Yes, many new contributors think that the same reviewer follow a draft all the way through, and it is natural that they think this way, because most of the world works in that fashion, especially when it's a matter of following up on suggested revisions, not outright rejection. In fact, OTRS at

2723:

2630:

You need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements Of the ones in the draft, the only possible one is the first, which is a 3rd party review, but it's completely not critical review which could have been and

1483:

and the controversy pages involving them. The two editors appear to have strong ties though they have on occasion posted on each others page. They are both extremely aggressive and make similar attacks, the behavior checks out. I don't want to start mass chaos on your page by pinging the active

1345:

on your part. You said you "simply do not see" the lying. That's worrysome. It means you are either an exceptionally gullible individual, or, more likely, you didn't do you homework looking at the evidence. The evidence of lies, both before the block and after, including right into his unblock

1253:(Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Knowledge (XXG) on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Knowledge (XXG) and as president of Wikimedia Australia. 4029:

necessarily an indication of notability. The second is a conventional paid death notice, normally placed by the undertaker. These are no indication of notability. The third is a hybrid, a paid death story, written like an obituary, but paid for by family. These can be mistaken for news

3770:

3483:

I and some other reviewers do not like to see a draft resubmitted without addressing the comments of the reviewer. If a contributor disagrees, they have semi-automatic options to discuss on the reviewer's talk page or to discuss at the AFC help desk, or can accept the advice to discuss at

2841:; I'm a WMF product manager working on an improvement to the Articles for Creation process. I think you've commented on this effort a couple times, but I wanted to reach out directly to get your feedback on some of the latest open questions. Our current plan is to add AfC drafts to the 4369:

As advice, to learn about notability, observe and participate at AfD. To lean about sources, keep up with the WP:RSN, the reliable sources noticeboard. The BLP Noticeboard is helpful also, but it mainly deal with particualrly contentious articles,not how to deal with routine material.

3504:

I'm pretty sure DGG means some authors think a reviewer follows a draft all the way through multiple reviews. I'm not aware of any reviewer that tries to do that. The decline templates (wrongly) encourage discussion on the reviewer's talk so I understand where that idea comes from. See

2872:

I will look at the details tomorrow and give some comments. But a general comment is that these scores have to be seen as a guide, and as a way of avoiding gross error, not as substitutes for judgment and knowledge of actual practice. The standard for acceptance at AfC is what is

1197:

that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only

2524:], I was wondering if you would not mind using your administrator glasses on my behalf to take a look at the deleted history. Please let me know where did I go wrong and I want to improve the page as per wiki rules and regulations. Your support would be greatly appreciated. 3559:

I see bad decline reviews - I just override them and note up the talkpage. I have yet to see a strong enough pattern of bad declines to start a serious discussion. I assume most of us watchlist draft we touch anyway which will bring reviewers back to the page sometimes.

2424:. Once I had my NPO and had proof of the person's identity, they immediately stopped, so I never had to press either charge. However, I did read a ton of material on tort law including the unlamented libel laws, now thankfully replaced with something far better in the 2428:. Anyway, as a result of all this I am slightly less fundamentalist about free speech than I was, having lived through a nutter posting wank fantasies about murdering my children. And this wasn't even a racist - he was a fundamentalist anti speed enforcement zealot. 2743:

I had not finished. In rewriting, I work in incremental stages. He did not discover helicons--he contributed to their theoretical explanation. But he did not do any of the work involving their use for nuclear fusion reactors or space propulsion,-(for that matter,

3532:

And I have also seen reviewers try to keep a AfC case resubmissions returned to them. I haven't seen any absolutely insist, but I have seen it encouraged; and it is easily possible to watchlist a draft--there are many instances of successive reviews by the same

1280:

lie about it repeatedly. It's all in the histories. I could lead you through it but at this point it's water under the bridge, I hope. I didn't bring these things up to get him in trouble but to make sure that his representations to others were taken cautiously.

1866:

Should uploading files be combined with a File namespace block, or as a separate option? (For example, if combined, when a user is blocked from the File namespace, they would neither be able to edit any existing pages in the File namespace nor upload new

3451:

general are unreliable, then like any WP process, the remedy is to encourage more participation. If there's a view that additional deletion reasons are needed, then that can be discussed also. The situation is confused enough without being provocative.

3379: 2850: 2532:) 09:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC) You need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements , not just a list of roles. If her work is important, it wil have been reviewed. 3208:

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the

1363:

The matter had been discussed sufficiently on the talk page that I saw no point in asking you again. I try to avoid charged words , and , looking back, I should have said just "I think the block is excessive, and I'm reducing it to time served."

4030:

obituaries, but they are not, and are not indications of notability. True obits are not paid for; they are written by staff, and they may or may not indicate notability; but true obits and hybrids can be confused, and require careful reading.

3771:

2129:

First, I tried to remove all the "tribute to Legéndy" remarks; also I added a few more explanatory notes to the scientific discussion, to make the essay more informative to encyclopedia readers. I addressed your four instructions as follows:

1761:. I don't believe that the claims of having innovated Noveramatry makes him notable. His fiction is available only as self-published on-demand print. You are more qualified than I am to judge his notability based on his scholarly publications. 2142:(4) The "nonstandard career" description mainly refers to Legéndy's neuroscience work, as the physics work (on helicons) is essentially made up of papers that came out of Legéndy's doctoral dissertation at the Cornell Physics Department. 2846: 3509:

for an example where I think a move to mainspace and a test at AfD is in order. This user is not going to take AfC no for an answer and the topic - a social media personality - is one of those grey areas where it could go either way.

1518:, yet the editor has never edited NBA nor Detroit Pistons. I've never seen this in someone interested in a subject not edit pages they feel strongly about. The editor uses the term "bro culture" and expresses extreme animosity toward 1832:

We will add a new checkbox for "Block this user from the whole site" which will be checked by default. When it is unchecked the admin will be able to specify which pages, categories, and/or namespaces the user should be blocked from

3590: 4002:

Sometimes. Yes for Obits published by universities. It probably depends on the author. The obit should make a claim of notability if it is being used as a claim of notability. Newspapers obits are paid, so take with salt.

3743:

1828:

Granular blocks (page, category, namespace, and file uploading) will be built on top of Special:Block. These blocks will function as if they were regular blocks and allow for the same options, but only take effect on specific

1855:

We like this direction because it builds on top of the existing block system, both a technical and usability wise. Before we get too far along with designs and development we'd like to hear from you about our prosposal:

4489:

Thank you for the (May 18) improvements to the “Draft: Charles Rudolf Legéndy” article. Yes, I should have thought of that, you are right to move some of the helicon paragraphs to the “Helicons (physics)” article.

2715:

2148:-- In the neuroscience field I included a citation from Donald Hebb, a big-name contributor to psychology and neuroscience. In Hebb (1976) he cites the brain capacity estimate from Legéndy (1967) in the introduction. 1685: 4182:

The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Knowledge (XXG). It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen.

2881:

to pass AfD. For NPP too, the standards are what the community currently thinks they are, not what the rules say they are supposed to be. Advice to users has to follow the consensus standard, not try to change

4265: 3382:

and being told by the same Admin that was not a problem. I post this just for context because Robert brought it up. Please do not share your thought on this because this may yet end up at ArbComm someday.

1143:

which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate

4445:

provides links to the data for resolving the disagreement. I se the discussion mentioned thepossibility thatt thesecould be used for search terms, but not routinely display--that seems a good idea.

3877:

Do you think an obituary in reputable newspapers like Telegraph et al is an auto-indicator of encyclopedic notability, in the event no other significant covg. about the subject could be discovered?

3618:

Do you think an obituary in reputable newspapers like Telegraph et al is an auto-indicator of encyclopedic notability, in the event no other significant covg. about the subject could be discovered?

4214: 1836:

Granular blocks can be combined and/or overlap. (For example, a user could be simultaneously blocked from editing the articles Rain, Thunder, Lightning, and all pages inside the Category:Weather.)

3276:

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.

1140: 4363:(3) There is an unfortunate tendency in Knowledge (XXG) to try to document statements by cherry-picking quotations that happen to use the word or phrase. References have to be used in context. 1845:

When a blocked user attempts to edit an applicable page, they should see a block warning message which include information on their block (reason, expiration, what they are blocked from, etc.)

2493:

Hi DGG, you have cleaned up some inappropriate prior edits from my predecessors at Lookout. I am trying to vindicate the page by doing things properly/neutrally. Can you help? This is the

1484:

editor, but I was wondering if you can run a user check or whatever the process may be. If you request me list the second user name, I can, but pinging the editor would result in a mess.

1461:) has returned under a different user name. I am not completely familiar with the process, I don't know if it is proper to ping the editor in question, but the editor recently attacked 2236: 3291: 1341:

DGG, I'll put it on the record here that I strongly object to your unilateral unblock, and I'm shocked you did this without at least the obligatory consultation – a clear breach of

4494:

in place and added some more to it, tying the physics to the efficient plasma generation — because predicting the surface mode was one of Legéndy’s main helicon contributions.

2720:

in place and added some more to it, tying the physics to the efficient plasma generation — because predicting the surface mode was one of Legéndy’s main helicon contributions.

3064: 1875: 3375: 3179:

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

2335:. It doesn't seem to add much, but as it was created through AfC in 2012, it wasn't recently created. It seems a reasonable enough redirect, so I've done that as well. ~ 3262:

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with

3110: 2631:

probably was copied from a press release. The others are either advertisements/press releases, or written by the company, or are general articles just mentioning it.

2328: 2321: 1821: 3115: 1312:

This editor hopes that his past conduct will never come up in discussion ever again. I won't abide by that. But like I said, this is hopefully water under the bridge.

2785: 1475:), I left a message on his talk page so you can see who the editor in question is. Both Tarc and the possible sock have posted heavily on similar pages which include 1798:

Hello :-) The Anti-Harassment Tools team at the Wikimedia Foundation will start building these granular blocking tools in a few weeks and we've asked WMF designer

3978:

not reliable for notability, and I think there is no clear level above that where a clear division can be drawn. To some extent I judge by the nature of the obit.

3719:

not reliable for notability, and I think there is no clear level above that where a clear division can be drawn. To some extent I judge by the nature of the obit.

3951:

IMO a full obituary in a broadsheet paper (UK: Times, FT, Observer, Telegraph, Grauniad) is normally a non-trivial reliable independent source, so counts towards

3692:

IMO a full obituary in a broadsheet paper (UK: Times, FT, Observer, Telegraph, Grauniad) is normally a non-trivial reliable independent source, so counts towards

3198:: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing. 3021: 3045: 2464: 3141: 4025:

for these. A news obituary in The Times or the NYT is an indication of notability. A news obituary, written by the obit writer, in the Washington Post is

3766:

for these. A news obituary in The Times or the NYT is an indication of notability. A news obituary, written by the obit writer, in the Washington Post is

4198:

will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection.

2784:

Hello, Should I contact you here or on the "Articles for deletion" page? My answer regarding your Brajovic comment can be found at the following link:

4071: 3812: 3583: 2950: 2757:

I hadn't started in the neuroscience part yet.When iI do it, I will decide what is worth emphasising on the basis of what has gotten most cited.

2613:

Hello, Which changes exactly can i do to make me sure that you can publish the article? I will try to change it. Thank you very much, Regards Teresa

2014: 1947: 1696: 1405: 1084: 2300:

Checking further, I am working on the first two. I do not consider the 3rd has any imaginal potential. A particularly absurd so-called micronation.

1564:. the place for this is either spi or ani. If something needs to be done quietly, this is one of the least suitable pages in WP to talk about it. 4410: 1178:, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new 2058:

It is very basic, and further edits should be done by the Knowledge (XXG) community. Do you think it would be possible to lift the protection?

149: 145: 138: 1611:

I closed the Del Rev -- I hope the script worked right--I do not think I ever used it before. I cannot identify the earlier edit history,

1412: 1029: 4320: 3905:

in itself an indicator of encyclopedic notability. Other newspapers have mileage that may vary. Does that fail to answer your question?

3646:

in itself an indicator of encyclopedic notability. Other newspapers have mileage that may vary. Does that fail to answer your question?

3300: 2362:

I think the redirect unnecessary, but nto worth arguing about. That afc should have accepted the article shows the problems with afc.

2204: 1863:

We believe this should be an expansion of Special:Block, but it has been suggested that this be a new special page. What are your thoughts?

1728: 4278: 2684: 2095: 4252: 1384: 1350: 989: 977: 961: 957: 953: 942: 938: 930: 926: 914: 910: 906: 902: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 863: 859: 855: 851: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 812: 808: 804: 800: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 761: 757: 753: 749: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 710: 706: 702: 698: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 659: 655: 651: 647: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 608: 604: 600: 596: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 220: 56: 3014: 1599:

and restore Denise Donnelly with full history intact to my userspace? I think there may be a better version someone where in the past.

1514:

Just to point out a few other anomalies, Dave Dial claims to be an older gentlemen possibly 50+ interested in the NBA particularly the

2350: 1681: 946: 922: 918: 895: 871: 867: 844: 820: 816: 793: 765: 663: 612: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 506: 502: 498: 494: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 455: 451: 447: 443: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 404: 400: 396: 392: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 353: 349: 345: 341: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 302: 298: 294: 290: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 251: 247: 243: 239: 232: 228: 224: 216: 212: 208: 200: 196: 192: 188: 181: 177: 169: 3285:

has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

2378:

Not to butt in, but you of all people should know that AFC in 2012 was an entirely different beast to the AFC of the last few years.

2136:(2) I included the two engineering firms referred to: ITT Avionics and Singer-Kearfott (now part of Marconi Electronic Systems) -- 510: 459: 408: 357: 306: 255: 204: 173: 165: 161: 157: 3537:

the hope that the next time they will get some reviewer careless enough to accept it--and they sometimes see their hope fulfilled.

3057: 2221:

they should have been merged to the library system or locality. I marked them appropriately. If there are more, please let me know.

1839:

Only one block is set at a time, to adjust what the user is blocked from the administrator would have to modify the existing block.

4386:(4) In dealing with an author, it is often helpful to organize the description of their work around their successive major books. 4294: 3134: 153: 3076: 3071: 3033: 4316: 3296: 2675: 2239:, I was wondering if you would not mind using your administrator glasses on my behalf to take a look at the deleted history of 2086: 3052: 3038: 3028: 1422: 1879: 1522:

both seem contradictory toward his/her profile description. The type of attack this editor uses matches the style Tarc uses.

1472: 1381: 1347: 49: 4409:

is used at the bottom of many articles with links showing how the topic is catalogued at various libraries. A discussion at

3105: 2853:. In addition to the copyvio parts, we would also definitely value your thoughts on the project as a whole. Thank you! -- 2820: 4417:

by unduly linking to external websites, and that many of the links are unhelpful. Do you have any thoughts on the value of

1677: 2666: 2567: 2494: 2077: 1848:

If a category is provided, the blocked user cannot edit either the category page itself and all pages within the category.

1059: 981: 3083: 1595:? Looks like all the usual admins who close DRVs have participated in the discussion. Oh can you also delete the current 985: 973: 965: 934: 3894: 3878: 3635: 3619: 3353:

I've tried to explain there is good reasons to move to main to seek deletion before. Please share your thought on this.

3326:, said that if a draft is not deleted in draft space, it should be moved to article space where it can be nominated for 2748:

has yet actually used them for space propulsion.) So really none of the applied material belongs in his bio at all.

969: 3223:

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator

3100: 2692: 2103: 4103: 3844: 3241:

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant

3127: 2505: 2267: 1596: 4083: 3824: 1954: 1713: 2913:

thank you for the initial thoughts -- and I'm looking forward to your further comments, particularly around copyvio.

1964: 4421: 4403: 2240: 1458: 126: 122: 115: 99: 87: 79: 75: 4234: 4163: 2957: 1723: 4035: 3910: 3776: 3651: 3492: 3415: 3343: 2529: 119: 111: 107: 103: 95: 91: 83: 71: 67: 3380:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/AfC_Process_Improvement_May_2018#Remove_the_threat_of_sanctions

3280: 1585: 3335: 1991: 1303:. I plan to have absolutely no further contact with this user. Thank you for your help with this situation. - 3266:. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential. 2208: 3213:' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace. 1703: 3506: 3210: 2932: 2858: 1870:

Should there be a maximum number of things to be blocked from? Or should we leave it up to admin discretion?

1063: 4093: 4088: 3834: 3829: 3004: 2997: 2990: 2200: 2026: 4340: 4246: 2525: 2501: 2346: 1927: 1887: 1417: 1329: 1286: 1776: 1718: 1708: 4098: 4078: 3839: 3819: 3248:

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for

2585: 2244: 2021: 1799: 1214: 4336: 3931:. The distinctions Robert McC gives above about paid obits is important to keep in mind in all cases. 3672:. The distinctions Robert McC gives above about paid obits is important to keep in mind in all cases. 3191: 1959: 3231:

if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

4210: 4119: 4031: 3906: 3860: 3772: 3647: 3601: 3488: 3411: 3339: 3165: 2968: 2842: 2053: 2037: 1975: 1739: 1433: 1102: 4108: 3849: 2248: 1182:

function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to

4053: 4008: 3794: 3749: 3565: 3515: 3429: 3388: 2576: 2425: 1999: 1612: 1546: 1501: 1070: 3242: 1754: 1671: 1299:. I think it would be best if Dr. F. simply took my talk page off his watch list, and adhered to 1163: 1133: 1091: 4432: 3923:

it is a clear determinant of notability at least for 1896+. I'm told this is true for the London

3664:

it is a clear determinant of notability at least for 1896+. I'm told this is true for the London

2928: 2854: 2838: 2811: 2383: 1666:

unwilling to hire from that group but do not want to overestimate the degree of rejection either.

1466: 1319: 4187: 3263: 3161: 1300: 4171: 1447:

I've never in fact opened a sockpuppet investigation, but I have strong reason to believe that

4505: 4479: 2731: 2660: 2618: 2561: 2342: 2158: 2071: 1923: 1883: 1784: 1766: 1325: 1282: 1044: 3228: 1758: 1342: 4206: 2927:

to the New Pages Feed, and not to remove anything or change peoples' existing workflows. --

2793: 2593: 1033: 1022: 4509: 4456: 4436: 4381: 4344: 4324: 4268:

blogpost 25 May 2018, second chance this year to participate in referencing Knowledge (XXG)

4123: 4057: 4039: 4012: 3989: 3968: 3952: 3942: 3914: 3886: 3864: 3798: 3780: 3753: 3730: 3709: 3693: 3683: 3655: 3627: 3605: 3569: 3554: 3519: 3496: 3484: 3471: 3446:

I consider this a perfectly good place for a discussion on this or any other aspect of AfC.

3433: 3419: 3392: 3347: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3304: 3249: 2972: 2936: 2897: 2862: 2815: 2797: 2768: 2735: 2642: 2622: 2543: 2509: 2480: 2458: 2441: 2419: 2413: 2387: 2373: 2356: 2332: 2311: 2295: 2275: 2212: 2183: 2162: 2041: 2003: 1979: 1931: 1891: 1788: 1770: 1743: 1626: 1605: 1592: 1575: 1550: 1538: 1534: 1528: 1505: 1490: 1437: 1387: 1375: 1353: 1333: 1307: 1290: 1106: 1073: 1048: 4115: 3898: 3856: 3639: 3597: 2964: 2033: 1971: 1735: 1632: 1515: 1476: 1429: 1098: 4414: 4213:. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in 2422: 1811: 4335:

I would really appreciate some advice. Please tell me if I'm not doing the right thing.

3897:- That would depend on the newspaper's obituary policy. Some newspapers, including the 3638:- That would depend on the newspaper's obituary policy. Some newspapers, including the 1236: 4049: 4021: 4004: 3790: 3762: 3745: 3561: 3511: 3425: 3407: 3384: 3359: 3319: 3315: 1995: 1542: 1497: 1452: 1315: 1304: 1067: 4452: 4428: 4377: 3985: 3963: 3957: 3938: 3726: 3704: 3698: 3679: 3550: 3467: 3403: 3378:

after specifically discussing removing the threat of sanctions against AfC reviewers

2893: 2807: 2764: 2638: 2539: 2475: 2469: 2454: 2436: 2430: 2408: 2402: 2379: 2369: 2307: 2291: 2179: 1634: 1622: 1571: 1462: 1371: 1225: 1210: 1199: 1187: 1002: 41: 17: 3190:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at

4501: 4475: 2727: 2656: 2614: 2557: 2154: 2067: 1780: 1762: 1480: 1040: 4354:

I've made some specific comments on the article talk page. But speaking generally.

4225: 4194:

of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that

4190:

include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the

1901: 1851:

If the File: namespace is blocked, the user should not be allowed to upload files.

1661:

I did this quick breakdown of some of the different groups and the willingness of

1221: 1206: 1194: 1183: 1167: 4427:, or any thoughts on how to contact editors who might have knowledge of its use? 4199: 2803: 2789: 1600: 1561: 1523: 1485: 1175: 1171: 1802:

to help us make some wireframes so the tools are intuitive to MediaWiki users.

4205:

Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are

2259: 1884:

SPoore (WMF) (talk) , Trust and Safety Specialist, Community health initiative

1820:

We have a first draft of how we think this tool should work. You can read the

1496:

Hey David, you should really do something about your paranoid sidekick here.

4195: 4191: 1913: 1448: 1151: 4413:

is questioning the merits of the template on the basis that it may violate

1806: 4285: 2126:

I resubmitted the draft -- Here I just want to say what changes I made.

1533:

Hey asshat, stop making stupid accusations about me, before I take you to

4447: 4372: 3980: 3933: 3721: 3674: 3545: 3462: 3363: 2908: 2888: 2834: 2759: 2633: 2534: 2449: 2364: 2302: 2286: 2174: 1617: 1566: 1366: 1132:

The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely

4305:. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message. 1272:, I'm fine with your unblock, but I just wanted to say that this editor 1120: 1186:. This information is currently only available to those with access to 3376:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Removal_from_the_list

4302: 3591:

Draft:Proposed "Liberty" Amendment to the United States Constitution

1990:

on a strange or maybe uneducated COI claim made by the nominator to

2467:. Sentencing next month. Her friend Jez Turner is already in jail. 4258: 4249:, May update allows wrangling of tabular information into Wikidata 4224: 3374:

I don't enjoy being three inches from ArbComm to desysop an Admin

1905: 1900: 4202:

misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm.

4240: 2133:(1) I cut the early part of the biography to its bare bones -- 1249: 1228:, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time. 1011:

Do not add comments here; this is an archive of earlier comments

3294:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

2806:, you were correct in posting on the deletion discussion page. 1753:

I am hesitant to PROD this article, but I don't think it meets

1672:

http://dailynous.com/2018/04/10/philosophers-less-willing-hire/

4474:

Edits (May 18 and beyond) to "Draft: Charles Rudolf Legéndy"

1842:

Block logs should display information about the granular block

1924:

SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative

4411:

Knowledge (XXG):External links/Noticeboard#Authority control

2465:

Woman who posted Holocaust denial songs to YouTube convicted

2237:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:SeosiWrestling

1897:

My poem is bad but my apology for the bad links is sincere!

1213:

on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on

4498:

addition to the “Legéndy is best known for” paragraph.

4290: 4167: 2724:

addition to the “Legéndy is best known for” paragraph.

4243:, a basic search interface for Wikidata lexemes and forms 2447:

I've learned a few things myself from being at arb com.

4237:, Wikidata's multi-lingual dictionary project gets going 2985:

Hello DGG, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

2418:

You might be interested in the actual statute at issue:

2284:

problem, finding the best strategy to prevent similar.

1541:

is that way, if you want to embarrass yourself further.

4162:

The Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the

2700: 2696: 2688: 2680: 2601: 2597: 2589: 2581: 2111: 2107: 2099: 2091: 1519: 1297: 1269: 4172:

ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video

1413:

Draft:Centro Universitário da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro

2651:

01:33:57, 22 May 2018 review of submission by OAKS222

2552:

09:08:22, 21 May 2018 review of submission by Terecam

2256:

appropriateness of those deletions? Warmest Regards,

2062:

20:48:35, 11 May 2018 review of submission by OAKS222

1729:

Draft:Silicon Valley Arbitration and Mediation Center

118:, 3406:, who then reversed their mistake. I see that you, 1276:

fabricate refs to sources that don't exist and then

3402:Hmmm. I see that mistakes were made, including by 3310:

Moving a Draft to Mainspace for Purpose of Deletion

2786:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sara Brajovic

2400:You are a much nicer person than I am. Well done. 2197:FYI, libraries being targeted for prod by rusf10 1637:of "willingness of academic philosophers to hire " 2329:National Film Award for Kannada Best Feature Film 2322:National Film Award for Kannada Best Feature Film 1860:What do you think of the proposed implementation? 1166:has received numerous improvements, including an 1615:might be able to, since he did the deletions. 4070:The following pages will become eligible for 3811:The following pages will become eligible for 3582:The following pages will become eligible for 3135: 2949:The following pages will become eligible for 2327:As a head's up, I've undone your deletion of 2013:The following pages will become eligible for 1946:The following pages will become eligible for 1695:The following pages will become eligible for 1404:The following pages will become eligible for 1083:The following pages will become eligible for 8: 4255:pushes ahead with data modelling and imports 3927:also. I am insufficiently familiar with the 3668:also. I am insufficiently familiar with the 3314:You may ignore this post if you choose, but 1205:The block notice shown on mobile will soon 4253:d:Wikidata:WikiProject British Politicians 3142: 3128: 2986: 2829:Copyvio recommendations for New Pages Feed 2198: 4281:. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. 3328:one of the A criteria for speedy deletion 3169:not get automatically indexed for Google. 1652:Nothing new here. But still interesting. 1443:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations 4301:: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at 1423:Draft:Lower East Preservation Initiative 4279:Knowledge (XXG):Facto Post mailing list 3424:Not the time or place to discuss this. 3092: 3003: 2996: 2989: 1882:. For the Anti-Harassment Tools team, 3236:Subject-specific notability guidelines 1633:Cool breakdown by U. of North Texas's 1112:Administrators' newsletter – May 2018 7: 1824:but here are the significant parts: 1111: 4229:OpenRefine logo, courtesy of Google 3245:nominating an article for deletion. 1668:--- Dr. Yancey<<<<< 3322:has frequently, in discussions at 3164:has been implemented. The flow at 1200:occurs when hard-blocking accounts 96:Universities & academic people 86:, 24: 4293:. Please leave feedback for him. 4261:Returns for a Second Time in 2018 1822:full proposed implementation here 1193:When blocking anonymous users, a 1184:see which filters are the slowest 1134:restricted to autoconfirmed users 1001:DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use 40:DO NOT ENTER NEW ITEMS HERE--use 4149: 2981:NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018 1775:The page has since been sent to 1235: 1150: 1119: 127:Bias, intolerance, and prejudice 4235:d:Wikidata:Lexicographical data 4084:Draft:Florida Geological Survey 3825:Draft:Florida Geological Survey 1955:Draft:Houston Foresight Program 1874:We appreciate your feedback on 1794:Help us design granular blocks! 1714:Draft:Perry Hall Primary School 1032:is asking for participation in 2849:and leave any thoughts on the 2489:Editing Lookout (company) page 1985:COI claim that needs attention 1965:Draft:Shearwater International 108:Books & other publications 1: 2869:from the different standards. 2847:my most recent project update 2497:that we would like reviewed. 2241:User:RenegadeMinds/Huntercoin 1992:User talk:Dazedbythebell#Note 1380:Evading an answer. Pathetic. 1060:Draft talk:Journey into Night 4164:ScienceSource grant proposal 3895:User:Winged Blades of Godric 3636:User:Winged Blades of Godric 2998:General notability guideline 2958:Draft:Francoism in Catalonia 2676:Draft:Charles Rudolf Legéndy 2251:. I recently "declined" ~20 2087:Draft:Charles Rudolf Legéndy 1910:Good message links are blue, 1724:Draft:Shokudaikiri Mitsutada 1034:this request for comment on 4330:Thanks for your help so far 4104:Draft:The Foundation Review 3955:. Paid obits, not so much. 3845:Draft:The Foundation Review 3696:. Paid obits, not so much. 3318:suggested that I ask you. 3250:organisations and companies 3116:Why was my article deleted? 3065:Organizations and companies 3005:Subject-specific guidelines 1597:User:Valoem/Denise Donnelly 1141:proposal is being discussed 1062:needs to be moved also, to 1058:The article's talk page at 4525: 4482:) 01:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 4317:MediaWiki message delivery 3297:MediaWiki message delivery 3227:, and submit the issue to 1804: 1322:if you want my attention.) 1296:DGG, see my response here 4058:02:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 4040:02:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 4013:09:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC) 3799:02:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 3781:02:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 3754:09:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC) 3336:Draft:Kopparapu Duo Poets 3218:Paid editing - new policy 1125:Guideline and policy news 102:, 4510:01:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 4457:04:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 4437:11:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 4382:06:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 4345:09:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 4325:10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 4146:– Issue 12 – 28 May 2018 4135:– Issue 12 – 28 May 2018 4124:03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 3990:04:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3969:00:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3943:23:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3915:17:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3887:05:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3865:03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 3731:04:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3710:00:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3684:23:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3656:17:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3628:05:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3606:03:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3570:04:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3555:04:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3520:02:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 3497:17:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3472:06:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3434:03:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3420:02:56, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3393:00:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC) 3348:23:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 3305:20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 3111:Common deletion outcomes 2973:03:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 2937:22:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 2898:03:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 2863:00:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 2816:15:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 2798:14:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 2769:02:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 2736:01:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 2643:20:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC) 2623:09:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC) 2544:01:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 2522:Given your sentiment at 2510:21:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2481:16:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 2459:21:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2442:20:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2414:19:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2388:16:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2374:16:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2357:12:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 2320:Restored and redirected 2312:01:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 2296:14:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC) 2276:18:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 2235:Given your sentiment at 2213:16:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 2184:02:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC) 2163:20:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC) 2042:03:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC) 2004:20:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC) 1980:03:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC) 1932:16:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC) 1876:this project's talk page 1030:feedback request service 3507:Draft talk:Ciera Rogers 3324:Miscellany for Deletion 2788:. Thanks for your time 1892:20:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC) 1789:20:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 1771:20:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 1744:03:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC) 1704:Draft:Esther Okjoo Shin 1686:04:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1678:Hodgdon's secret garden 1627:21:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC) 1606:21:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC) 1576:05:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 1551:01:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 1529:01:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 1506:00:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 1491:23:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 1438:03:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 1388:14:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 1376:06:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 1354:20:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1334:17:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1308:17:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1291:16:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1176:search existing filters 1107:03:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1074:17:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 1064:Talk:Journey into Night 1049:04:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 50:Barnstars, Awards, etc. 4295:Back numbers are here. 4230: 4186:The basic criteria of 4066:G13 Eligibility Notice 3807:G13 Eligibility Notice 3578:G13 Eligibility Notice 2945:G13 Eligibility Notice 2877:to pass AfD, not what 2009:G13 Eligibility Notice 1942:G13 Eligibility Notice 1934: 1779:by another patroller. 1691:G13 Eligibility Notice 1400:G13 Eligibility Notice 1195:cookie will be applied 1079:G13 Eligibility Notice 80:COI & paid editors 4228: 4094:Draft:Orland E. Esval 4089:Draft:Kern Wildenthal 4048:Well put, I agree. — 3835:Draft:Orland E. Esval 3830:Draft:Kern Wildenthal 3789:Well put, I agree. — 3332:Articles for Deletion 2027:Draft:Robert Schotter 1904: 1663:academic philosophers 1318:this page, so please 1220:There will soon be a 1209:and point users to a 4211:alternative medicine 4158:ScienceSource funded 3022:Astronomical objects 2054:User:MiaMlnr/sandbox 1586:Ascot–Guildford line 1418:Draft:Eleanor Herman 4399:As you would know, 4247:OpenRefine tool 3.0 4170:on May 18. See the 3077:Sports and athletes 3046:Geographic features 2886:Special:New Pages) 2500:Thank you, Eileen 2426:Defamation Act 2013 1777:Draft:Mehdi Ghasemi 1719:Draft:Salina Vortex 1709:Draft:Name necklace 1207:be more informative 1172:syntax highlighting 123:Educational Program 88:Bilateral relations 4231: 4099:Draft:Simon Weller 4079:Draft:Devere Allen 3840:Draft:Simon Weller 3820:Draft:Devere Allen 3279:The next issue of 3194:for more details. 2245:User:0x0F/Datacoin 2022:Draft:Amit Goswami 1935: 1757:but it might meet 1591:Can you close the 1054:Journey into Night 1021:Please comment on 120:In Popular Culture 68:Deletion & AfD 4422:Authority control 4404:Authority control 4395:Authority control 4314: 4313: 4207:tropical diseases 3967: 3708: 3478:More AFC Thoughts 3295: 3152: 3151: 3106:Guide to deletion 3101:Notability essays 2821:talk page stalker 2502:Eileen at lookout 2479: 2440: 2412: 2355: 2274: 2215: 2203:comment added by 2002: 1960:Draft:Reza Gouran 1323: 132:General Archives: 114:, 104:Academic journals 72:Speedy & prod 64:Topical Archives: 4516: 4426: 4420: 4408: 4402: 4288: 4286:Charles Matthews 4273:To subscribe to 4178:A medical canon? 4153: 4152: 4147: 4139: 4138: 3961: 3884: 3702: 3625: 3289: 3144: 3137: 3130: 2987: 2912: 2824: 2705: 2704: 2606: 2605: 2473: 2434: 2406: 2339: 2338: 2270: 2264: 2257: 2116: 2115: 1998: 1816: 1814: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1313: 1252: 1239: 1181: 1154: 1123: 1036:Talk:Dana Loesch 1023:Talk:Dana Loesch 94:, 4524: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4484: 4424: 4418: 4406: 4400: 4397: 4332: 4306: 4284: 4223: 4160: 4154: 4150: 4142: 4137: 4068: 4032:Robert McClenon 3907:Robert McClenon 3899:Washington Post 3879: 3875: 3809: 3773:Robert McClenon 3648:Robert McClenon 3640:Washington Post 3620: 3616: 3580: 3489:Robert McClenon 3480: 3412:Robert McClenon 3340:Robert McClenon 3312: 3307: 3148: 3088: 2983: 2947: 2906: 2839:Marshall Miller 2831: 2818: 2782: 2678: 2674: 2653: 2579: 2575: 2554: 2526:Abdulwahidmalek 2520: 2518:Deleted history 2491: 2398: 2336: 2325: 2273: 2268: 2260: 2233: 2231:Deleted history 2195: 2172:what I can do. 2152: 2149: 2089: 2085: 2064: 2049: 2011: 1987: 1944: 1899: 1818: 1812: 1810: 1796: 1781:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1763:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1751: 1693: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1640: 1639: 1589: 1516:Detroit Pistons 1477:Hillary Clinton 1445: 1402: 1266: 1248: 1222:calendar widget 1179: 1114: 1081: 1056: 1026: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4522: 4520: 4483: 4472: 4470: 4467: 4464: 4462: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4396: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4384: 4367: 4364: 4361: 4358: 4355: 4331: 4328: 4312: 4311: 4307: 4297: 4282: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4256: 4250: 4244: 4238: 4222: 4219: 4180: 4179: 4159: 4156: 4155: 4148: 4136: 4130: 4128: 4112: 4111: 4109:Draft:Whip Bow 4106: 4101: 4096: 4091: 4086: 4081: 4067: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4043: 4042: 4022:User:SmokeyJoe 4020:, replying to 4015: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3921:New York Times 3874: 3871: 3869: 3853: 3852: 3850:Draft:Whip Bow 3847: 3842: 3837: 3832: 3827: 3822: 3808: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3784: 3783: 3763:User:SmokeyJoe 3761:, replying to 3756: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3662:New York Times 3615: 3612: 3610: 3594: 3593: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3539: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3479: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3457: 3448: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3408:User:Legacypac 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3360:User:Legacypac 3320:User:Legacypac 3316:User:Legacypac 3311: 3308: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3277: 3268: 3267: 3254: 3253: 3246: 3233: 3232: 3225:if appropriate 3215: 3214: 3200: 3199: 3181: 3180: 3171: 3170: 3150: 3149: 3147: 3146: 3139: 3132: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3113: 3108: 3103: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3087: 3086: 3080: 3079: 3074: 3068: 3067: 3061: 3060: 3055: 3049: 3048: 3042: 3041: 3036: 3031: 3025: 3024: 3018: 3017: 3011: 3008: 3007: 3001: 3000: 2994: 2993: 2984: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2961: 2960: 2946: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2901: 2900: 2883: 2870: 2843:New Pages Feed 2830: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2781: 2778: 2776: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2711: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2672: 2652: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2612: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2573: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2519: 2516: 2514: 2495:proposed draft 2490: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2324: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2298: 2266: 2249:Draft:Paraduin 2232: 2229: 2227: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2205:185.253.97.170 2194: 2191: 2189: 2187: 2186: 2167: 2150: 2147: 2122: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2083: 2063: 2060: 2048: 2047:Genesis Mining 2045: 2030: 2029: 2024: 2010: 2007: 1986: 1983: 1968: 1967: 1962: 1957: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1917: 1911: 1909: 1898: 1895: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1861: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1834: 1830: 1817: 1809: 1800:Alex Hollender 1795: 1792: 1750: 1747: 1732: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1692: 1689: 1638: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1613:King of Hearts 1588: 1583: 1581: 1579: 1578: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1509: 1508: 1444: 1441: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1326:Dr. Fleischman 1283:Dr. Fleischman 1265: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1218: 1203: 1191: 1156:Technical news 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1137: 1113: 1110: 1095: 1094: 1080: 1077: 1055: 1052: 1025: 1019: 1017: 1015: 997: 996: 992: 949: 898: 847: 796: 745: 694: 643: 592: 541: 490: 439: 388: 337: 286: 235: 184: 141: 134: 125: 110: 90: 66: 60: 36: 35: 31: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4521: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4481: 4477: 4473: 4471: 4468: 4465: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4449: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4423: 4416: 4412: 4405: 4394: 4385: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4374: 4368: 4365: 4362: 4359: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4329: 4327: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4310: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4292: 4287: 4280: 4276: 4267: 4263: 4262: 4257: 4254: 4251: 4248: 4245: 4242: 4239: 4236: 4233: 4232: 4227: 4220: 4218: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4203: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4189: 4184: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4157: 4145: 4141: 4140: 4134: 4131: 4129: 4126: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4110: 4107: 4105: 4102: 4100: 4097: 4095: 4092: 4090: 4087: 4085: 4082: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4073: 4065: 4059: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4028: 4023: 4019: 4016: 4014: 4010: 4006: 4001: 4000: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3965: 3960: 3959: 3954: 3950: 3944: 3940: 3936: 3935: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3885: 3883: 3882:Winged Blades 3872: 3870: 3867: 3866: 3862: 3858: 3851: 3848: 3846: 3843: 3841: 3838: 3836: 3833: 3831: 3828: 3826: 3823: 3821: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3814: 3806: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3769: 3764: 3760: 3757: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3742: 3741: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3723: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3706: 3701: 3700: 3695: 3691: 3685: 3681: 3677: 3676: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3626: 3624: 3623:Winged Blades 3613: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3585: 3577: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3547: 3541: 3540: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3526: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3445: 3444: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3404:User:Primefac 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3381: 3377: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3309: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3293: 3284: 3283: 3278: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3265: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3251: 3247: 3244: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3212: 3211:move to draft 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3185: 3184:Backlog drive 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174:Deletion tags 3167: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3156: 3145: 3140: 3138: 3133: 3131: 3126: 3125: 3123: 3122: 3117: 3114: 3112: 3109: 3107: 3104: 3102: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3091: 3085: 3082: 3081: 3078: 3075: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3059: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3035: 3032: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3023: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3013: 3012: 3010: 3009: 3006: 3002: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2988: 2980: 2978: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2959: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2952: 2944: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2929:MMiller (WMF) 2926: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2910: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2890: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2855:MMiller (WMF) 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2828: 2822: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2780:Sara Brajovic 2779: 2777: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2677: 2673: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2578: 2577:Draft:Sinnaps 2574: 2572: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2559: 2556: 2555: 2551: 2549: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2498: 2496: 2488: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2463:Predictably: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2451: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2438: 2433: 2432: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2410: 2405: 2404: 2395: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2354: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2334: 2330: 2323: 2319: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2271: 2265: 2263: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2238: 2230: 2228: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2192: 2190: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2124: 2123:Dear DGG -- 2113: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2084: 2082: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2046: 2044: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2016: 2008: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1984: 1982: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1958: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1941: 1939: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1915: 1907: 1903: 1896: 1894: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1869: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1823: 1815: 1808: 1803: 1801: 1793: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1749:Mehdi Ghasemi 1748: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1698: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1664: 1653: 1645: 1636: 1635:George Yancey 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1598: 1594: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1442: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1407: 1399: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1344: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1321: 1317: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1263: 1261: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1238: 1227: 1226:Special:Block 1223: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1180:equals_to_any 1177: 1174:, ability to 1173: 1169: 1168:OOUI overhaul 1165: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1086: 1078: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1024: 1020: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003:User talk:DGG 995: 994: 993: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 144: 140: 137: 133: 129: 128: 124: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76:NPP & AfC 73: 69: 65: 61: 59: 58: 53: 52: 51: 46: 45: 44: 43: 42:User talk:DGG 34: 33: 32: 30: 29: 19: 18:User talk:DGG 4500: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4486:Dear DGG — 4485: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4446: 4398: 4371: 4337:KellysHero01 4333: 4315: 4308: 4298: 4274: 4260: 4204: 4185: 4181: 4161: 4143: 4132: 4127: 4113: 4069: 4026: 4017: 3979: 3956: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3902: 3881: 3876: 3868: 3854: 3810: 3767: 3758: 3720: 3697: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3643: 3622: 3617: 3609: 3595: 3581: 3544: 3485:the Teahouse 3481: 3461: 3449: 3373: 3313: 3282:The Signpost 3281: 3270: 3269: 3256: 3255: 3235: 3234: 3224: 3217: 3216: 3202: 3201: 3195: 3183: 3182: 3173: 3172: 3154: 3153: 2976: 2962: 2948: 2924: 2887: 2878: 2874: 2832: 2783: 2775: 2758: 2745: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2712:Dear DGG — 2710: 2663: 2632: 2611: 2564: 2547: 2533: 2521: 2513: 2499: 2492: 2468: 2448: 2429: 2417: 2401: 2399: 2363: 2340: 2326: 2301: 2285: 2261: 2252: 2234: 2226: 2199:— Preceding 2196: 2188: 2173: 2166: 2153: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2074: 2057: 2050: 2031: 2012: 1988: 1969: 1945: 1936: 1918:So here's a 1914:proofreading 1873: 1854: 1819: 1813:Task T190350 1797: 1774: 1752: 1733: 1694: 1675: 1670: 1662: 1660: 1654: 1651: 1641:"": --> 1616: 1601: 1590: 1580: 1565: 1524: 1486: 1481:Barack Obama 1469: 1455: 1446: 1427: 1403: 1365: 1343:admin policy 1340: 1277: 1273: 1267: 1259: 1240: 1233: 1155: 1149: 1124: 1118: 1115: 1096: 1092:Draft:Recime 1082: 1057: 1035: 1027: 1016: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1000: 999: 998: 950: 899: 848: 797: 746: 714: 695: 644: 593: 542: 491: 440: 389: 338: 287: 236: 185: 142: 135: 131: 130: 78:, 63: 62: 55: 54: 48: 47: 39: 38: 37: 27: 26: 25: 4291:ContentMine 4200:Prophylaxis 4168:ContentMine 3257:Not English 3084:Web content 2396:You know... 1807:Phabricator 1805:Tracked in 1164:AbuseFilter 98:, 4275:Facto Post 4259:#1Lib1Ref 4241:Ordia tool 4196:edge cases 4144:Facto Post 4133:Facto Post 4116:HasteurBot 3857:HasteurBot 3598:HasteurBot 3203:Editathons 2991:Notability 2965:HasteurBot 2333:WP:CSD#A10 2034:HasteurBot 1972:HasteurBot 1736:HasteurBot 1430:HasteurBot 1314:(I am not 1241:Obituaries 1099:HasteurBot 92:Notability 4192:long tail 4074:shortly. 4050:SmokeyJoe 4005:SmokeyJoe 3929:Telegraph 3815:shortly. 3791:SmokeyJoe 3746:SmokeyJoe 3670:Telegraph 3586:shortly. 3562:Legacypac 3512:Legacypac 3426:Legacypac 3385:Legacypac 3015:Academics 2953:shortly. 2851:talk page 2017:shortly. 1996:Hoverfish 1950:shortly. 1920:good link 1755:WP:AUTHOR 1699:shortly. 1543:Dave Dial 1520:white men 1498:Dave Dial 1408:shortly. 1382:Fut.Perf. 1348:Fut.Perf. 1264:OberRanks 1250:Lankiveil 1211:help page 1087:shortly. 1068:Netoholic 106:, 74:, 57:Reminders 4429:Johnuniq 4299:Reminder 4215:Issue 11 4188:WP:MEDRS 4114:Thanks, 3919:For the 3855:Thanks, 3660:For the 3596:Thanks, 3364:User:DGG 3264:WP:NPPNE 3166:the feed 3162:WP:ACREQ 3093:See also 2963:Thanks, 2808:Primefac 2667:contribs 2568:contribs 2380:Primefac 2201:unsigned 2078:contribs 2032:Thanks, 1970:Thanks, 1922:for you 1908:are red, 1833:editing. 1734:Thanks, 1473:contribs 1463:RoySmith 1459:contribs 1428:Thanks, 1316:watching 1301:WP:STICK 1188:Logstash 1097:Thanks, 139:Sept-Dec 112:Sourcing 82:, 70:, 28:ARCHIVES 4502:OAKS222 4476:OAKS222 4283:Editor 4072:CSD:G13 4018:Comment 3873:Obits.. 3813:CSD:G13 3759:Comment 3614:Obits.. 3584:CSD:G13 3533:person. 3229:WP:COIN 3155:ACTRIAL 3058:Numbers 2951:CSD:G13 2837:-- I'm 2728:OAKS222 2689:history 2657:OAKS222 2615:Terecam 2590:history 2558:Terecam 2253:clearly 2155:OAKS222 2100:history 2068:OAKS222 2015:CSD:G13 1948:CSD:G13 1916:stinks, 1867:files.) 1759:WP:PROF 1697:CSD:G13 1406:CSD:G13 1320:ping me 1268:Hi. Re 1215:desktop 1085:CSD:G13 1041:Legobot 150:Mar-Apt 146:Jan-Feb 116:Fiction 100:Schools 4303:WD:WFM 4289:, for 4277:go to 3953:WP:GNG 3694:WP:GNG 3243:BEFORE 3192:WT:NPR 3072:People 3034:Events 2875:likely 2804:Abonzz 2790:Abonzz 2746:nobody 2331:under 2247:, and 1878:or by 1829:pages. 1602:Valoem 1593:WP:DRV 1562:Valoem 1525:Valoem 1487:Valoem 1144:limit. 4453:talk 4415:WP:EL 4378:talk 4221:Links 4166:from 3986:talk 3964:Help! 3939:talk 3925:Times 3727:talk 3705:Help! 3680:talk 3666:Times 3551:talk 3468:talk 3358:Yes, 3053:Music 3039:Films 3029:Books 2894:talk 2879:ought 2765:talk 2697:watch 2693:links 2639:talk 2598:watch 2594:links 2540:talk 2476:Help! 2455:talk 2437:Help! 2409:Help! 2370:talk 2337:Amory 2308:talk 2292:talk 2262:Godsy 2193:prods 2180:talk 2108:watch 2104:links 1906:Roses 1880:email 1659:: --> 1658:: --> 1657:: --> 1656:: --> 1655:: --> 1623:talk 1572:talk 1372:talk 1066:. -- 951:2023: 900:2022: 849:2021: 798:2020: 747:2019: 696:2018: 645:2017: 594:2016: 543:2015: 492:2014: 441:2013: 390:2012: 339:2011: 288:2010: 237:2009: 186:2008: 143:2007: 136:2006: 16:< 4506:talk 4480:talk 4433:talk 4341:talk 4321:talk 4266:IFLA 4209:and 4120:talk 4054:talk 4036:talk 4009:talk 3911:talk 3861:talk 3795:talk 3777:talk 3750:talk 3652:talk 3602:talk 3566:talk 3516:talk 3493:talk 3430:talk 3416:talk 3389:talk 3362:and 3344:talk 3301:talk 3292:here 3271:News 3196:NOTE 2969:talk 2933:talk 2859:talk 2812:talk 2794:talk 2732:talk 2701:logs 2685:talk 2681:edit 2661:talk 2619:talk 2602:logs 2586:talk 2582:edit 2562:talk 2530:talk 2506:talk 2384:talk 2269:CONT 2209:talk 2159:talk 2112:logs 2096:talk 2092:edit 2072:talk 2038:talk 2000:Talk 1976:talk 1928:talk 1888:talk 1785:talk 1767:talk 1740:talk 1682:talk 1643:edit 1547:talk 1502:talk 1467:talk 1453:talk 1449:Tarc 1434:talk 1330:talk 1305:O.R. 1287:talk 1270:this 1103:talk 1045:talk 1039:. 1028:The 941:, 929:, 925:, 890:, 878:, 874:, 839:, 827:, 823:, 788:, 776:, 772:, 737:, 725:, 721:, 686:, 674:, 670:, 635:, 623:, 619:, 584:, 572:, 568:, 533:, 521:, 517:, 482:, 470:, 466:, 431:, 419:, 415:, 364:, 317:, 313:, 270:, 266:, 262:, 258:, 254:, 246:, 242:, 231:, 227:, 215:, 4448:DGG 4373:DGG 4309:{ 4027:not 3981:DGG 3958:Guy 3934:DGG 3903:not 3768:not 3722:DGG 3699:Guy 3675:DGG 3644:not 3546:DGG 3463:DGG 3330:or 3290:Go 3186:: 2925:add 2909:DGG 2889:DGG 2882:it. 2835:DGG 2833:Hi 2760:DGG 2634:DGG 2535:DGG 2470:Guy 2450:DGG 2431:Guy 2403:Guy 2365:DGG 2303:DGG 2287:DGG 2175:DGG 1912:My 1618:DGG 1567:DGG 1539:SPI 1535:ANI 1367:DGG 1278:did 1274:did 1260:}} 1224:at 988:, 937:, 886:, 835:, 784:, 733:, 682:, 631:, 580:, 529:, 478:, 427:, 368:, 360:, 309:, 274:, 250:, 211:, 176:, 84:BLP 4508:) 4455:) 4435:) 4425:}} 4419:{{ 4407:}} 4401:{{ 4380:) 4343:) 4323:) 4264:, 4174:. 4122:) 4056:) 4038:) 4011:) 3988:) 3941:) 3913:) 3880:~ 3863:) 3797:) 3779:) 3752:) 3729:) 3682:) 3654:) 3621:~ 3604:) 3568:) 3553:) 3518:) 3495:) 3470:) 3432:) 3418:) 3391:) 3346:) 3303:) 3157:: 2971:) 2935:) 2896:) 2861:) 2814:) 2796:) 2767:) 2734:) 2699:| 2695:| 2691:| 2687:| 2683:| 2669:) 2641:) 2621:) 2600:| 2596:| 2592:| 2588:| 2584:| 2570:) 2542:) 2508:) 2457:) 2386:) 2372:) 2349:• 2345:• 2310:) 2294:) 2258:— 2243:, 2211:) 2182:) 2161:) 2110:| 2106:| 2102:| 2098:| 2094:| 2080:) 2040:) 1978:) 1930:) 1890:) 1787:) 1769:) 1742:) 1684:) 1676:-- 1625:) 1574:) 1549:) 1537:. 1504:) 1479:, 1436:) 1374:) 1332:) 1324:-- 1289:) 1281:-- 1170:, 1139:A 1116:] 1105:) 1047:) 984:, 980:, 976:, 972:, 968:, 964:, 960:, 956:, 945:, 933:, 921:, 917:, 913:, 909:, 905:, 894:, 882:, 870:, 866:, 862:, 858:, 854:, 843:, 831:, 819:, 815:, 811:, 807:, 803:, 792:, 780:, 768:, 764:, 760:, 756:, 752:, 741:, 729:, 717:, 713:, 709:, 707:M 705:, 701:, 690:, 678:, 666:, 662:, 658:, 654:, 650:, 639:, 627:, 615:, 611:, 607:, 603:, 599:, 588:, 576:, 564:, 560:, 556:, 552:, 548:, 537:, 525:, 513:, 509:, 505:, 501:, 497:, 486:, 474:, 462:, 458:, 454:, 450:, 446:, 435:, 423:, 411:, 407:, 403:, 399:, 395:, 384:, 380:, 376:, 372:, 356:, 352:, 348:, 344:, 333:, 329:, 325:, 321:, 305:, 301:, 297:, 293:, 282:, 278:, 223:, 219:, 203:, 199:, 195:, 191:, 172:, 168:, 164:, 160:, 156:, 152:, 148:, 4504:( 4478:( 4451:( 4431:( 4376:( 4339:( 4319:( 4118:( 4052:( 4034:( 4007:( 4003:— 3984:( 3966:) 3962:( 3937:( 3909:( 3859:( 3793:( 3775:( 3748:( 3744:— 3725:( 3707:) 3703:( 3678:( 3650:( 3600:( 3564:( 3549:( 3514:( 3491:( 3466:( 3428:( 3414:( 3387:( 3342:( 3299:( 3252:. 3209:' 3143:e 3136:t 3129:v 2967:( 2931:( 2911:: 2907:@ 2892:( 2857:( 2823:) 2819:( 2810:( 2792:( 2763:( 2730:( 2703:) 2679:( 2664:· 2659:( 2637:( 2617:( 2604:) 2580:( 2565:· 2560:( 2538:( 2528:( 2504:( 2478:) 2474:( 2453:( 2439:) 2435:( 2411:) 2407:( 2382:( 2368:( 2353:) 2351:c 2347:t 2343:u 2341:( 2306:( 2290:( 2272:) 2207:( 2178:( 2157:( 2114:) 2090:( 2075:· 2070:( 2036:( 1974:( 1937:. 1926:( 1886:( 1783:( 1765:( 1738:( 1680:( 1647:] 1621:( 1570:( 1545:( 1500:( 1470:· 1465:( 1456:· 1451:( 1432:( 1385:☼ 1370:( 1351:☼ 1328:( 1285:( 1217:. 1202:. 1190:. 1136:. 1101:( 1071:@ 1043:( 990:O 986:S 982:A 978:J 974:J 970:M 966:A 962:M 958:F 954:J 947:D 943:N 939:O 935:S 931:A 927:J 923:J 919:M 915:A 911:M 907:F 903:J 896:D 892:N 888:O 884:S 880:A 876:J 872:J 868:M 864:A 860:M 856:F 852:J 845:D 841:N 837:O 833:S 829:A 825:J 821:J 817:M 813:A 809:M 805:F 801:J 794:D 790:N 786:O 782:S 778:A 774:J 770:J 766:M 762:A 758:M 754:F 750:J 743:D 739:N 735:O 731:S 727:A 723:J 719:J 715:M 711:A 703:F 699:J 692:D 688:N 684:O 680:S 676:A 672:J 668:J 664:M 660:A 656:M 652:F 648:J 641:D 637:N 633:O 629:S 625:A 621:J 617:J 613:M 609:A 605:M 601:F 597:J 590:D 586:N 582:O 578:S 574:A 570:J 566:J 562:M 558:A 554:M 550:F 546:J 539:D 535:N 531:O 527:S 523:A 519:J 515:J 511:M 507:A 503:M 499:F 495:J 488:D 484:N 480:O 476:S 472:A 468:J 464:J 460:M 456:A 452:M 448:F 444:J 437:D 433:N 429:O 425:S 421:A 417:J 413:J 409:M 405:A 401:M 397:F 393:J 386:D 382:N 378:O 374:S 370:A 366:J 362:J 358:M 354:A 350:M 346:F 342:J 335:D 331:N 327:O 323:S 319:A 315:J 311:J 307:M 303:A 299:M 295:F 291:J 284:D 280:N 276:O 272:S 268:A 264:J 260:J 256:M 252:A 248:M 244:F 240:J 233:D 229:N 225:O 221:S 217:A 213:J 209:J 207:, 205:M 201:A 197:M 193:F 189:J 182:D 180:, 178:N 174:O 170:S 166:A 162:J 158:J 154:M

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index