User talk:DW - Knowledge (XXG)

430:

obviously meant to be a joke (such as my note to Brion) and your late husband's hate-filled attacks on other contributors. If his (and, presumably, your) daughter grows up not understanding the difference between these two ideas, then I hope she leaves home as soon as possible to learn the difference between off-color humor and speech expressing vicious hatred towards another person. This, of course, includes comparing, without any noticeable proof, an individual to Osama Bin Laden -- as far as hate speech goes, this about as hateful as possible and I, for one, find it imeasurably hateful as it trivializes bin Laden's evil by equating with what is, at most, a disagreement over what qualifies as a famous Canadian. I certainly hope, for your daughter's sake, that you understand the difference between a statement of hatred and the humorous use of a word commonly perceived as impolite.

606:

more often the norm (in areas that had advanced beyond tribalism). I'd like to see Zoe explain better whether she wants this to be an iron rule or a guideline to be used as appropriate. Anyway, you've poisoned the well a bit on this one by editing the George Washington page directly rather than by using a Talk: page, which would have been more diplomatic. It's hard to take your side to the extent that you engage in ad hominem attacks. When someone's ideas are mistaken, it is more effective to attack the ideas than to attack the person. Attacking the person here is likely to end in banishment. I hope that doesn't happen, because I like your work.

104:

Similarly, your statements that no Dutch person would name himself Jeronimo may or may not have any basis in fact whatsoever. I have had no luck in deciphering exactly what the problem with the name is, however it is most certainly not evidence of any quality that he is not Dutch. My understanding is that the Netherlands is a diverse land with many different positions and viewpoints, and I certainly hope there is enough cultural acceptance there to allow any citizen to go by any name. And for the record, I do know two born-and-bred patriotic Americans named Benedict, and one named Arnold.

3484: 529:

to use the French names doesn't mean you should go through and write them all in French, except for the article title. If you are truly attempting o expand knowledge, then you should write as if your audience knows very little -- you might think it a natural conclusion for people to see Henri throughout an article on Henry I of France asd figure it out that Henri is Franch for Henry, but it isn't really that way. Many people will just be confused.

1814: 1707: 1437: 3123: 3592: 537:

there is perhaps more genealogical info than is necessary in historical biography. I say this because people often see a list of names and decide they should link to their own articles, which is not always a good idea. We often know so little about younger daughters, etc., that there's no point in an encyclopedia, althought there would be in a dictionary of biography -- but wikipedia is not a dictionary.

2488:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2445:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2402:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2359:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2316:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2185:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2142:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 2099:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 1659:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 3344:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 3690: 140:

with anyone discussing the meaning of the word "famous," I simply believe that DW has shown that he is unwilling to discuss anything and would prefer to use deception and pigheaded stubbornness to convince everyone to give up and leave him alone to do as he pleases. Any attempts at discussing this with him, Ed, is welcome and well-meaning but will probably be useless.

1323: 119:. DW's squabble with Jeronimo about whether a given musical group are "famous" enough -- is not actually vandalism. Deleting the whole page and writing KEWL is vandalism. There's no way Jimbo is going to ban him, simply because you (and maybe me) think he's on the wrong side in an edit war. Now, let's go back to 3165:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 605:

DW, I thought you made a good point about putting a country of origin next to a person's details. Sometimes it makes sense and sometimes it doesn't. For example, nation-states were born with the Treaty of Westphalia (1648). Prior to that, the concept of countries was quite fluid. City-states were

429:

While I can understand DW's apprehension about his daughter being exposed to my and someone else's comments in the freely accessible Recent Changes page, I should certainly hope that he (and you) can/could/will differentiate and explain the differences between something that uses foul language but is

327:

By shrinking my images, information is lost. While that might be not a real problem on the screen, it starts getting ugly when someone tries to print such an image. So, usual practice (you can find many examples of this in the image list, just search it for "small") for shrinking an image "xx.jpg" is

139:

I didn't mean to suggest that Jimbo or anyone else will ban him because he's on the wrong side in an edit war, but because of his immaturity and unwillingness to compromise. I simply stated that I would, if I could, ban him, or at least seek a community acceptance of banning him. I have no problems

91:

First of all, if you are truly trying to change the tenor of the "discussion" by signing in under a different username and pretending to be someone else, then that alone is, in my mind, enough to warrant a temporary ban as it shows a basic disregard for the principles of cooperation and scholarship.

2946:

status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases

2738:

2650:

2562:

2234:

1630:

Moreover, it appears that Papin did not move to London until some unknown time after 1685. Additionally, his works were not published until 1707 at the earliest. I can't imagine how Savery would even come to know of Papin or his work until then at the earliest, and even then I would not be surprised

544:

DW, I'm rather confused at what you are attempting to accomplish here at Knowledge (XXG). The project succeeds only because people are willing to work with each other and establish common conventions. Those conventions are certainly open to change, but coming in as a new contributor and unilaterally

528:

DW -- please not the format we use for alternate language names, perhaps by looking at an article on a Holy Roman Emperor or Polish City. You will note that we place the alternate, usually non-English, names in parentheses after the name of the language in italics). Just because you want everybody

362:

Find an image, look at it on your screen when set to 1024x768, take a ruler and measure the width. Now do the same again, but at 640x480. Then do both of that on a screen with a different physical size. Then save that image, open it in Paintshop (or whatever). Set it to 75 dpi and print it. Then set

3706:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

1843:

status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases

1736:

1100:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link

103:

Fourthly, your ad hominem attacks are irrelevant and silly. Even assuming Jeronimo espoused actual racist beliefs towards Americans, this should not be barring him from writing an article on Canadians (which are not the same thing as Americans, as I'm sure you know if you are, in fact, Canadian).

384:

Others have weighed in on your userpage, and I must agree that I find it offensive and silly. Assuming you are really DW's widow, I should certainly hope that you realize that no one on Knowledge (XXG) murdered him, and I resent the accusation otherwise; of course, if you have serious reasons for

3501:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

2017:

status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the

1930:

1460:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases

1352:

99:

Thirdly, you seem to be placing an awful lot of importance on an article that, in my eyes, is not too important at all. I can not think of any reason why I might ever want to look at a list of famous Canadians and I believe all such lists are useless, but I do not interfere and attempt to delete

1622:

For one thing, the two designs appear to work in completely different fashions. Papin's uses steam pressure to force a piston down, thereby pushing water out the bottom of the cylinder. Savery's uses the vacuume created by condensing steam to pull water up into the cylinder. This may seem like a

570:

It occurs to me, and I hope you'll reflect on this and take it to heart, that you might apply some marketing expertise to your presentation of your self. Regard the rest of us as potential customers for your ideas -- and sell those ideas to us in an appealing package, rather than yelling at us.

536:

DW -- generally, we respond to people's comments -- is there a problem with the way we've been doing articles? If so, you should perhaps offer alternative ways of doing things. You're putting huge amounts of interesting info in, but it's looking very cribbed from other sources (are they PD) and

1626:

To demonstrate the difference, note that Edward Somerset's design that was built at Raglan uses the same operating cycle as Savery's, and differs primarily in having two cylinders instead of one. It long predates either Savery or Papin, and is located not far from Savery. If Savery did copy the

107:

In light of all these things (and the comments on your user page and talk page), I must conclude that if I had the power to, I would have banned you (and all your aliases) several days ago. I hope you never get involved with any of the articles I am working on, and I would not be sorry in the

3394:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

3200:

3030:

95:

Secondly, I have taught five-year-old children who have responded to arguments more intelligently and with greater maturity than you have shown. I don't know how old you are, but if you are, in fact, older than twelve, I suggest you think long and hard about your response to disagreements.

1578:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. 1532:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. 350:

I wish you would quit abusing other contributors; I'm embarassed for you to see the things you say. We're all here because we believe in what wikipedia stands for, other people just as much as you, and friendliness would go a long way towards making everyone's time here pleasant.

3636:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

563:

You wrote, to Magnus, "Instead of trying to be a hero and getting people like Zoe to stroke your ego, slow down and do things properly. Looking at a page with your kind of minimal input and poor quality, overwhelming photos, is what turns people away from Knowledge (XXG)."

100:

them. Your repeated vandalism of the page, and I don't see how it could be characterized as anything else since it violates the obviously agreed upon community standard, is shameful no matter how many other wonderfully written and edited articles you have written.

467:

Yes, welcome. Do you have a better picture of the Arrow? We don't use BMP here since that's a Microsoft-only format, and anyway it was really badly dithered. Do you know where the original came from? I'm sure we can produce a better picture from the original.

444:

This space here at the top is where users normally put in some information about themselves, eg. qualifications, experience, or just plain personal data. It would be nice to know more about you, DW. I'd hate to think that there is nothing to know. Best regards,

1265:

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the

1888:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1781:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1505:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1397:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1191:

because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG) (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information. Thank you.

484:

Yes, I used GIMP to convert it, but the format itself ws designed by Microsoft for Microsoft Windows, and is particularly suited to the Win32 API. Sure, a few folks have nonetheless figured it out and can use them on real computers :-), but it's still

1241:

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Knowledge (XXG) are

639:

We understood it was related to image use, which could be under copyright. We would like to know more. Also, we would like to know if some pictures, uploaded by this user, and still on en:wikipedia, may be consider safe or not. example :

418:

I don't understand the morons who think they are making a contribution with half-assed material that is of little interest or benefit to anyone except the retard who posted it. I had not intended, but will get around to doing this one

508:

article forward -- it will not be done until there is proper material added to the list for non-French Carolingians and an explanation that they aren't exclusively a part of French History. At present, I believe there is a link in

385:

believing that Mav or Zoe or someone else actually murdered him in any relevant meaning of the word, then this doesn't apply. Otherwise, I request that you change your user page as it is unnecessarily inflammatory and misleading.

288:

You have produced a lot of good work in the Knowledge (XXG), and I'd hate to see us develop hard feelings. If you really feel that the Knowledge (XXG) consensus is wrong, please discuss it either on the mailing list or at the

545:

changing them is not the way to go about it. Why not work with the other contributors here, instead of chnaging things as you alone see fit? If you want to work on Knowledge (XXG), you should take a look at

397:

02:53 Jan 30, 2003 Amedeo Modigliani (Fixing yp an article which morons keep changing to an arbirary policy that they falsely call a Knowledge (XXG) policy. This is the tenth+ time I have fixed their mess

3161:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3606:, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (XXG) (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. 1067:. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. 1884:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1777:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3665: 2911: 517:

which is much more comprehensive and explains more than a bunch of names. If you are concerned about this, or would like more of an explanation, I suggest you read my extensive comments at

2848: 2821: 1501:

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1393:

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3316:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 207:

As far as I remember (and I'm with wikipedia almost since the beginning), a maximum width of 350 pixel for images was agreed upon, so an image won't be too large even on smaller screens.

1037:. I've marked it as {{no source}} for now. If you can verify it's source, could you please document that on its description page and supply the most appropriate tag from the list of 994:. You wrote that it's public domain, but as there is no information on its source to confirm that, I've marked it as {{unverified}} for now. If you can verify that it is indeed 63:

Look at all of the articles written by anybody else. Do you see them doing it the way you're doing? I will continue to change them if you put them back the way they were. --

3312:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

273:

was your first answer on a talk page. I think it's a good thing. Can you also give some answers to questions about source and copyright status of the images you've uploaded.

702: 152:--a few sentences are very confusing right now, and some important details are lacking. You seem to know a lot about the Quebec independence thing, so maybe you can help? 3542:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3435:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3241:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

3071:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2987:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2779:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2691:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2603:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2275:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

2058:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

1971:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

392:) and another user, the specific complaint of which I am currently unable to find, I note that your late husband has left the following comments in the edit comments box: 3505:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

3398:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

3204:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

3034:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2914:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. — 306:

DW, I just discovered that you actually *replace* my images, instead of uploading your smalled version to a different name (e.g., "xx_small.jpg"). An example of that is

3782: 2851:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2824:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2533:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 1292:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 1166:. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 3305:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

3301:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3147:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. 3777:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

735: 3710:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

1634:

Do you have a source for this claim? Without further information on Papin's patents, or a direct linkage of the two men, I believe this claim is in error.

3812: 584:

Thanks so much for being here. You seem so knowledgeable about so many things (so few of us are!). I wish you liked us one-tenth as much as we like you.

413:(cur) (last) . . 22:41 Jan 20, 2003 . . 64.228.30.101 (putting back my photos that idiot, Ericd removed without reason and a severe lack odf brains...DW) 3661: 3555: 3448: 3254: 3144: 3084: 2530: 1289: 1163: 636:

The french wikipedia might find benefit in knowing precisely the reason why that user was hard banned. It is not clearly mentionned in the user page.

160:

I thought the accepted disambiguation format for movies was to use the title then (movie), or the title then (year movie) if there are more than one?

3395:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3201:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3031:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3817:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

3743: 3739: 3723: 3719: 3551: 3444: 3321: 3250: 3166: 3155: 3140: 3080: 2996: 2788: 2700: 2612: 2284: 2067: 1980: 1889: 1782: 1506: 1398: 3668:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

57:

DW, it is Knowledge (XXG) convention to include a complete sentence i nthe first line of every article. Please don't go around changing that. --

233:). And, with my mentioning of being here a long time I was merely trying to point out your attitude, which is a little absolutistic ("...images 3747: 3571: 3464: 3367: 3270: 3170: 3100: 3000: 2792: 2704: 2616: 2511: 2468: 2425: 2382: 2339: 2288: 2208: 2165: 2122: 2071: 1984: 1893: 1786: 1682: 1267: 1464:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use

1356:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use

108:

slightest to see you leave Knowledge (XXG) permanently. I don't believe the Knowledge (XXG) Community needs or wants contributors like you.

1131: 619:

Of coure it isn't useful in cases where there is no advantage in using an arbitrary nationality. As I've said elsewhere, when I wrote the

1105:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on

1064: 3502:

information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

3774: 546: 3208: 3038: 669:

all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the

3536: 3532: 3429: 3425: 3356: 3235: 3231: 3065: 3061: 2981: 2977: 2950:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2773: 2769: 2742:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2685: 2681: 2654:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2597: 2593: 2566:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2500: 2457: 2414: 2371: 2328: 2269: 2265: 2238:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

2197: 2154: 2111: 2052: 2048: 2021:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1965: 1961: 1934:

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1878: 1874: 1847:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1771: 1767: 1740:

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1671: 1590: 1544: 1495: 1491: 1387: 1383: 1255: 1102: 1038: 999: 941: 893: 842: 595:

DW, It is imperative that you stop being mean to people. Your work is generally good, why are you doing this? Please email me:

377:

DW, sorry to do this but at Jimbo's request I have blocked your ability to contribute to this website as a "signed-in user". --

3808: 1188: 550: 489:

a Windows thing, and I don't want to have to repeat that whole last paragraph every time I tell someone not to use it. --LDC

453: 949: 901: 850: 363:

it to 600 dpi and print again. Notice a pattern there? All of them are different sizes in inch, but the same size in pixels.

3483: 3293:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3526: 3419: 3225: 3055: 2971: 2922: 2763: 2675: 2587: 2259: 2042: 1955: 1868: 1761: 1485: 1377: 120: 3731: 3520: 3351: 3306: 2495: 2452: 2409: 2366: 2323: 2192: 2149: 2106: 1666: 1585: 1539: 355:

DW, what image are you talking about? It would be nice to know exactly which sin you're accusing me of, I lose track ;-)

230: 3642: 270: 3707:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

1456:

Thanks for uploading these images. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the

719: 666: 204:"You were told already..." - did you become owner of wikipedia? I wasn't notified of that! Apologies, your majesty! ;-) 460:, it should point you to the standards and instructions for adding images to articles. Hope you enjoy contributing! 307: 598:, and let's chat about it. I hate to ban good people, but if you continue to insult people, I'll have no choice. -- 3804: 3624: 3599: 3585: 2138: 1835: 1803: 168: 2441: 1601: 1555: 998:, could you please document that on its description page and supply the most appropriate PD tag from the list of 979: 972: 919: 868: 358:

While I'm at it, you are (still) in error about image sizes in pixels and inches. Let me phrase it in bold text:

23: 1222:. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The 290: 3313: 3162: 3108: 2856: 2829: 2538: 2296: 2079: 1885: 1778: 1502: 1394: 820: 705:

Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at

678: 518: 3493: 2642: 835: 85: 2907: 2009: 2001: 1285: 934: 3674: 3638: 3340: 3289: 3192: 3184: 3151: 3131: 2181: 1344: 1312: 469: 388:

With regards to your late husbands comments re: my comments in the edit window of Brion Vibber's talk page (

195: 149: 3778: 3770: 3727: 1813: 1706: 1436: 1422: 1219: 1212: 886: 373:

DW's latest threats have been placed on the Wiki list and sent around, as requested by some other members.

3386: 3378: 2730: 1418: 1060: 1045: 830: 3104: 2852: 2825: 2534: 2398: 2292: 2075: 1655: 1647: 1528: 1520: 1235: 310:. Please link to that larger version from the image desctiption via the media namespace, as I did above. 2817: 2312: 457: 339:

In any case, on the image description page of the small image should be a media: link to the large one.

77:

I don't see very well what makes you think I have any knowledge in politics. But I'll see what I can do

3702:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 3559: 3497:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 3452: 3413: 3390:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 3258: 3219: 3196:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 3136: 3088: 3049: 3026:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2965: 2757: 2669: 2581: 2253: 2095: 2036: 1949: 1862: 1755: 1728: 1696: 1574: 1566: 1479: 1371: 1088: 1075: 953: 905: 854: 39: 2226: 730:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "

3755: 3022: 2844: 1637: 1223: 1184: 1173: 1138: 1119: 825: 554: 299:

standards that I'm adhering to, it's what the Knowledge (XXG) community in general have decided. --

2938: 2484: 342:

Yes, I know the large image is still in the "history" list, but it is unlikely to be found there. --

3822: 3325: 1922: 1914: 1127: 505: 422: 180: 161: 153: 141: 111: 3298: 1014:

I haven't got time at the moment to investigate your accusations, but I suggest you put a copy at

952:, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim 904:, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim 560:

Yo, DW. I like a lot of your ideas, and so do others. But please try not to be so antagonistic.

403:

21:23 Oct 12, 2002 . . DW (Hopefully, final deletions of American hater Osama bin Jeronimo's work)

3669: 3575: 3509: 3402: 2954: 2942:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2801: 2746: 2734:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2713: 2658: 2646:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2625: 2570: 2558:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2242: 2230:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2025: 2013:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1938: 1926:. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1851: 1744: 1468: 1426: 1360: 1159: 1148: 915:

where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. ] 22:21, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

494: 367: 343: 317: 240: 222: 864:

where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. ] 03:54, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

709:

those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

3609:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

689:

license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Knowledge (XXG)'s license, the

3007: 2947:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

2919: 2739:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

2651:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

2563:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

2554: 2235:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1991: 1844:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1737:

link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1623:

minor distinction, but it basically means the two types were completely different in concept.

1510: 1405: 1299: 1202: 803: 790: 713: 510: 3302: 1015: 478:

handles it well), but it's not well compressed, nor is it widely supported in web browsers. -

3698: 3657: 3274: 3174: 2893: 2355: 968: 959: 911: 860: 670: 599: 479: 176: 3603: 3565: 3458: 3264: 3094: 747:

I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

3751: 3614: 3469: 1901: 1034: 642: 620: 588: 17: 3294: 335:

or to upload the large image as "xx (large).jpg", and upload the small image as "xx.jpg".

1619:, you claimed that Savery copied Papin's design. I find this very difficult to believe. 1322: 3818: 3363: 3143:

as to why its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the

2878: 2526: 2507: 2464: 2421: 2378: 2335: 2204: 2161: 2118: 1678: 1597: 1551: 1461:

link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1353:

link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1123: 1101:

to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See

1019: 765:

I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:

237:

too large...","...you were told..."). Well, maybe the NPOV is finally getting to me ;-)

3602:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

3591: 3122: 1839:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1732:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1348:. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 3628:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2796: 2708: 2620: 1247: 1096:

information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the

995: 991: 682: 607: 461: 332:

either upload the smaller image as "xx (small).jpg", and change the link on the page,

92:

It is deceptive and lowers the threshold of morality for the entire Knowledge (XXG).

567:

You also wrote, to Zoe, some interesting, if rude, words about marketing expertise.

3004: 2915: 2882: 2785:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

2697:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

2609:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

2281:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

2064:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

1988: 1977:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded

1790: 1402: 1296: 1271: 1243: 1199: 795: 651: 514: 456:

article to your attention? As well as outlining Knowledge (XXG) standards on the

434: 378: 124: 78: 50: 33: 2018:

website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1931:

website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

1227: 3716:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3548:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3441:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3247:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3077:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

2993:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3746:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 3689: 1616: 1003: 964: 724: 662: 596: 575: 262: 1627:

design from somewhere, it appears much more plausible he did it from Somerset!

772:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "

3786: 2889: 1897: 698: 279: 258: 248: 198:

will do just fine. I will also get notified if there's a message for me there.

3703: 3498: 3391: 3197: 3027: 2943: 2735: 2647: 2559: 2231: 2014: 1927: 1840: 1733: 1457: 1349: 1231: 1097: 945: 897: 846: 738:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: 257:

Could you put some information about the source and copyright status of the

44: 133:

One man's vandalism is another man's graffiti art or direct action protest.

1179: 1154: 1080: 1050: 1251: 624: 538: 530: 522: 498: 446: 300: 71: 64: 58: 3135:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 360:

There is no relation between the size of an image in inches and pixels.

239:

You still haven't told me what you mean with "2.5 inches", though... --

2886: 963:

where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much.

247:

DW I wonder if the images you've uploaded are really free of right ?

3736:

the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

1754:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading 1130:. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at 794:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- 497:

article? And, if you like, tell us a bit about yourself! Enjoy!

313:

Also, do that for all the images you already have "overwritten".

3516: 3409: 3215: 3045: 2961: 2866: 2753: 2665: 2577: 2249: 2032: 1945: 1858: 1751: 1475: 1367: 781: 734:" template into their user page, but there are other options at 690: 475: 3347:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2491:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2448:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2405:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2362:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2319:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2188:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2145:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2102:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1662:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1581:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

1535:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

118:

Ahem, excuse me <just clearing my throat, I have a cold: -->

3826: 3793: 3759: 3679: 3646: 3578: 3473: 3371: 3328: 3277: 3177: 3112: 3010: 2926: 2896: 2860: 2833: 2806: 2718: 2630: 2542: 2515: 2472: 2429: 2386: 2343: 2300: 2212: 2169: 2126: 2083: 1994: 1905: 1793: 1686: 1640: 1605: 1559: 1513: 1478:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read 1408: 1370:. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read 1302: 1274: 1205: 1141: 799: 408:

02:59 Jan 30, 2003 User talk:Jtdirl (Note to a mental midget )

3785:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

3688: 3632:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

3590: 3482: 3121: 229:

DW, you are correct in one point: it is 250, not 350 pixel (

70:

DW -- I showed you mine -- Now why don't you show us yours?

948:

status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the

900:

status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the

849:

status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the

493:

Welcome, DW. Might I suggest that you also check out the

1118:

This message notification has been automatically sent by

210:

What is it with your "2.5 inches"? Are you talking about

623:

article, I said he was "Latvia-born", not "Latvian". --

3711: 3543: 3436: 3242: 3072: 2988: 2780: 2692: 2604: 2276: 2059: 1972: 956:, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just 908:, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just 857:, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just 3539: