435:
discussion. All attempts to communicate with these members 1-on-1 have been ignored and I'm left with little recourse. Understand, I'm not seeking punishment but rather want to know whether there is a forum to make these members actions visible to others so that their actions are recognized, letting the community make a decision as a whole. What would be your recommended actions in this case? I will refrain from mentioning names and specifics at the moment but am prepared to do so at a moments notice. I have no intention of sounding hostile but I am concerned about the histories of the members in question and their overall effect on several articles of notice. Perhaps you can provide some insight? (Reply wherever you prefer) --
1020:
while until I tried to add external references and instead of that by mistake added external links. I realised that when I saw the page after I had saved it, so I tried to go back to it to remove the external links and instead provide references, but before I could achieve that the administrator came in. Please could you sort this out so I can re-create the page more in wiki style. I have tried to read wiki instructions further on style and I will try to adhere to it as before. It will be a shame if the page is deleted and the world at large will not have access to some valuable stuff out there. Hoping to get an early reply from you. Kind regards.
999:, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again,
156:
751:
555:
helpful and also that I really really liked your very positive attitude. I hope I can contribute in a small measure to this growing community. I do not have any monetary connections with WiPP, that is that I am not paid by them or will not gain financially from them. Take care and with regards
WorkingInPartnershipProgramme (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC) WiPP 26/04/08 (hope this is how we are supposed to or able to communicate with you).
336:. My comment was more specific, with regards to the actual diffs you presented. The whole confusing username part of the policy is extremely, and ironically (heh), ambiguous, and I'm loathe to oppose users based on such examples, mostly because they are easily rectifiable. Regardless, I do respect your opinion on the matter, and we can simply agree to disagree on this particular point. Again thanks for dropping me a line, sir. Cheers!
698:. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Knowledge, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use
684:
1139:
1157:. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --
1084:
907:
971:. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you!
802:), and this, adding with the promotional name, made me believe the user was simply using Knowledge to spam for this charity, which in this cause was true. It wasn't a matter of biting a newbie so much as stopping someone who was spamming Knowledge. Sometimes a heavy hand's needed in these cases. I am a believe in
638:. My block came three days after the policy change, as I wasn't aware that the policy had changed. My bad - I'll unblock, but since they haven't requested a username change I guess they've registered a new username, as they were softblocked and not hardblocked, so would have been able to create a new account.
609:
Thanks for the message - when someone's chosen a long username of randomly typed characters they've clearly chosen to ignore the guidance on the account creation page. Yes, their edits weren't vandalism, but they have subsequently been reverted. Yes, too, I could have raised it with them, but as it's
1183:
I would just like to say thanks for the neutral vote in my recent RFA. I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me and gave me a neutral vote have made me make a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then
458:
which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll
554:
Many thanks for your messages. Don't want to take too much of your time as I am sure you have much to do with millions of people accessing wiki. I was trying to work it out as to how to contact you; I finally found your page though not yet Dan's. I just wanted to say that your suggestions were very
83:
Looking around here, that's probably great advice. I think I will stick away, from now on, from any pages but article and article discussion pages. I think doing otherwise would be a mistake. I am poor at the policy stuff in real life, too, and have a mentor who runs interference for me so I can
1019:
Hi Dan, I hope this reaches you soon. The wiki administrator is saying that the WiPP page may be deleted. I would like to contest that. I think it is my fault that I did not edit it properly and created an impression that the page was blatantly advertising something. The page had been there for a
659:
article. I've explained this change at the bottom of the Talk:Richard
Sternberg page under "Opening Paragraph". The primary reason I'm asking for input from a third party is that I've already run into conflict with several rather adamant contributors who have already removed my contributions and
104:
Hi. I couldn't help notice your username and you might consider changing it. It doesn't particularly offend me ("cocks") as it's probably your real name, but some users might object to it. Just thought I'd let you know. The same thing happened with me before. My original username was "Miss Pussy
434:
I have a question about drawing community attention to one or two members of the community who I believe to be harmful and intentionally biased in their editing. These members make repeated edits to the same article, removing anything they deem to be undesirable without engaging in community
920:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
1184:
and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again.
610:
clearly confusing, not even a borderline case, I chose to block first - the block notice contains an explanation of the changing username procedure (although probably registering a new account would be easier). Thanks.
1113:
neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many
1253:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
519:
Sorry, that was a bit on the uncivil side of things. Another editor is under my skin at the moment and I'm reacting in ways that I typically do not. Please accept my apologies. Best regards, --
764:
unanimously with the support of 100 editors. Your kindness is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to
588:
Dan, I am assuming this will be read by you. Hope the WiPP page is getting better. Once you say its ok, more material can be added. I am also planning to create a contents box. Take care
1219:, has been nominated for deletion. This template was previously nominated for deletion in February, and I am notifying everyone who posted a comment then about the current discussion.
1063:
Thanks for your support at my recent
Request for adminship. I promise not to get too upset about the comma splices :-) I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best,
699:
996:
622:
Erm, well, there is a notice on the account creation page - scroll down a bit and under the privacy section or so (I've just logged out to have a look) it says
455:
1095:
695:
757:
798:
on my talk page. The reason I added the template (and if you look at the user's edits), was that this user was adding this link to a number of pages (see
960:
806:, but that can only go so far. I hope this answers some of your concerns, if not, feel free to drop me a line and we can talk about it more if you wish.
1154:
571:
Because that is where the "talk page" link for DBC directs the response. This was lifted from Weber's sig. but the username was not changed by DBC.
169:
126:
1025:
593:
546:
on my talk page. Pasting here due to reference to you. This one was quite sometime back, but, I dont know, for what reason, I had pasted this at
459:
do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--
1278:
634:
didn't expressly say "confusing usernames aren't blockable" - it does link to the username policy, which I can see has changed in the last
483:
Thanks for the warm welcome. I was just wondering if your message meant i broke a rule or if u were just informing me. Thanks anyway,
469:
873:
572:
36:
218:
To add, I stand corrected regarding this. I just looked of the username policy and see that is different. Thanks for the heads up!
1274:
203:
Thanks, Twinkle needs to fix that then. Although I thought names consisting of random characters WAS against
Knowledge policy?
1196:
1166:
356:
261:
What I meant was that I have contributed to that area a lot. Sorry for a misunderstanding, I ask you to please reconsider.
403:
1021:
589:
543:
399:
1265:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1270:
891:
795:
603:
811:
799:
308:
286:
267:
223:
208:
887:
395:
68:
I do not know what a nong is, but I think I agree with you. How do you get any experts to stick it out? --
1004:
465:
1216:
1222:
867:
732:
703:
576:
562:
536:
853:
665:
440:
247:
145:
111:
1266:
1120:
1044:
807:
655:
I apologize if this is asking too much but I wanted to get your input on a change I've made to the
420:
337:
303:
281:
262:
219:
204:
85:
69:
48:
724:
1193:
1162:
917:
837:
524:
508:
346:
193:
162:
155:
89:
73:
484:
1242:
1233:
1000:
978:
959:
Hello DanBealeCocks, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in
769:
656:
547:
460:
377:
640:
612:
328:
Hey Dan, thanks for taking your response to my talk page. I definitely see your point here -
1262:
1246:
1068:
938:
913:
862:
750:
728:
707:
558:
1261:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
660:
refuse to discuss the matter with me. Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide. --
778:
661:
436:
243:
141:
106:
105:
Galore" and a user requested that I change it and it did. But of course it's up to you.--
29:
Please tell me where you'd like me to reply, on my talk page or your talk page. Thanks.
1258:
1250:
1116:
926:
765:
683:
488:
416:
333:
1254:
1187:
1158:
828:
803:
627:
520:
504:
329:
239:
183:
973:
857:
373:
984:
711:
17:
1064:
55:
391:
Hi Dan - echoing
Ashanda's comment above, thank you for your welcome message.
1282:
1227:
1205:
1170:
1138:
1124:
1072:
1053:
1029:
1009:
948:
895:
842:
815:
773:
736:
669:
644:
616:
597:
580:
566:
528:
512:
492:
473:
444:
424:
381:
362:
315:
293:
274:
251:
227:
212:
198:
149:
116:
93:
77:
27:
1040:
727:
is a user trying to reach you, but not able to! Have left him some help.
1083:
856:
article; yep, will do. I suppose I get so focused on deletion I forget
132:
Support - It'd be nice to have an admin who actually works on articles
906:
706:
anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! -
1249:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
995:
Hi DanBealeCocks; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my
794:
Hi Dan, and thanks for the concern about that warning I gave
430:
Question concerning harmful community members and their edits
1093:, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my
1082:
905:
172:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
154:
46:
Sorry, I don't know why I didn't spot you were archiving.
242:
does not provide a talk link. Not sure if you realized.
635:
631:
181:
Oops! I forgot about that! Twinkle needs updating.
1241:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
624:Your username must not: be offensive or confusing
1153:Many thanks for your participation in my recent
161:Hello, DanBealeCocks. You have new messages at
127:Knowledge:Requests_for_adminship/Kumioko#Support
929:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
883:Thanks for the welcome. Very much appreciated.
413:Thank you very much for your welcome message.
503:.... But that had already been addressed. --
280:Another user has commented on the situation.
8:
745:
1039:I removed the category because it was a
1035:Working in Partnership Programme (WiPP)
825:Yeah, I clicked the wrong button on AWB
238:Just a comment but I hate the way your
1136:
860:. I'll remember to welcome next time.
7:
140:You may not of meant what you said!
852:I imagine you're talking about the
916:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
544:User:WorkingInPartnershipProgramme
25:
1267:review the candidates' statements
84:just do my work and research. --
37:User_talk:DanBealeCocks/Archive 1
1137:
1101:, which ended successfully with
796:User:Food Bank For New York City
749:
682:
630:at the time the report was made
542:Below is pasted a response from
454:Thanks for supporting my recent
756:Thank you for participating in
1273:. For the Election committee,
1243:Arbitration Committee election
1234:ArbCom elections are now open!
1228:20:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1283:16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1022:WorkingInPartnershipProgramme
590:WorkingInPartnershipProgramme
372:It is very much appreciated!
925:Smile at others by adding {{
755:
694:...Thank you for supporting
1269:and submit your choices on
1211:Pointer to a TfD discussion
858:that editors matter as well
696:my nomination for adminship
626:. The notice at the top of
302:Thanks, I didn't see that.
1298:
1275:MediaWiki message delivery
748:
737:14:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
712:04:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
670:21:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
645:16:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
617:15:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
604:User:Agdsgasdghahjasdhgsda
581:21:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
567:23:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
529:23:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
513:22:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
493:06:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
474:03:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
445:15:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
425:12:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
404:19:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
382:17:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
363:23:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
316:23:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
294:23:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
275:23:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
252:20:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
228:17:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
213:17:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
199:20:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
150:17:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
117:20:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
56:21:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
1143:
878:16:13, May 10, 2008 (UTC)
742:Thank you from Horologium
368:Thank you for the welcome
134:as well as creating drama
94:21:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
78:04:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1206:16:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1171:16:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1125:06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1073:13:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
1054:22:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
1030:12:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
1010:22:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
985:20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
949:09:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
896:18:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
843:20:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
816:17:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
651:Talk: Richard Sternberg
598:08:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
177:Re: confusing usernames
1087:
967:with a final tally of
935:Have a great day ! --
910:
159:
1247:Arbitration Committee
1155:request for adminship
1097:request for adminship
1086:
997:request for adminship
909:
776:for nominating me. —
456:request for adminship
158:
821:Re: typo corrections
720:For your information
163:ArcAngel's talk page
1251:arbitration process
1217:Template:Mpdb movie
953:
674:
35:my first archive -
1263:arbitration policy
1088:
975:weburiedoursecrets
911:
170:remove this notice
160:
18:User talk:DanBeale
1201:
1176:
1175:
1051:
1007:
946:
931:
888:Eric.k.herberholz
879:
840:
787:
786:
717:
716:
675:Lady Aleena's RfA
657:Richard Sternberg
548:User talk:Kmweber
472:
396:Anansi's Calabash
358:
353:
196:
16:(Redirected from
1289:
1204:
1199:
1190:
1147:RfA: Many thanks
1141:
1134:
1133:
1115:
1098:
1049:
1047:
1046:Ten Pound Hammer
1005:
981:
976:
945:
936:
923:
865:
861:
854:Edison Chopstick
841:
836:
781:
753:
746:
686:
679:
678:
535:copy-paste from
463:
357:
351:
347:
341:
324:Re: RfA Comments
313:
306:
291:
284:
272:
265:
197:
192:
186:George D. Watson
173:
114:
109:
54:
41:
21:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1271:the voting page
1237:
1213:
1202:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1132:
1127:
1096:
1089:
1080:
1061:
1045:
1037:
1017:
993:
988:
979:
974:
956:
937:
933:
903:
901:Just to say hai
885:
863:
850:
826:
823:
792:
779:
744:
722:
677:
653:
643:
615:
607:
540:
500:
481:
452:
432:
411:
389:
370:
361:
352:
349:
339:
326:
309:
304:
287:
282:
268:
263:
259:
236:
182:
179:
174:
167:
124:
112:
107:
102:
66:
47:
44:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1295:
1293:
1240:
1236:
1231:
1212:
1209:
1197:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1150:
1149:
1144:
1142:
1131:
1128:
1081:
1079:
1078:RfA thank-spam
1076:
1060:
1057:
1050:and his otters
1036:
1033:
1016:
1013:
992:
989:
957:
955:
952:
942:
922:
904:
902:
899:
884:
881:
849:
846:
832:
822:
819:
808:Wildthing61476
791:
788:
785:
784:
754:
743:
740:
721:
718:
715:
714:
687:
676:
673:
652:
649:
648:
647:
639:
636:couple of days
611:
606:
601:
586:
585:
584:
583:
556:
539:
533:
532:
531:
499:
498:Gee, Thanks...
496:
480:
477:
451:
448:
431:
428:
410:
407:
388:
385:
369:
366:
348:
344:
325:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
297:
296:
258:
255:
235:
232:
231:
230:
220:Wildthing61476
205:Wildthing61476
187:
178:
175:
166:
153:
138:
137:
123:
120:
101:
98:
97:
96:
65:
62:
60:
43:
40:
33:
31:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1294:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1229:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:Ed Fitzgerald
1218:
1210:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1194:
1192:
1191:
1179:My Recent Rfa
1178:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1112:
1109:opposes, and
1108:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1091:DanBealeCocks
1085:
1077:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1048:
1042:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1014:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1002:
998:
990:
987:
986:
983:
982:
977:
970:
966:
962:
954:WBOSITG's RfA
951:
950:
944:
943:
940:
932:
930:
928:
919:
915:
908:
900:
898:
897:
893:
889:
882:
880:
877:
876:
871:
870:
866:
859:
855:
847:
845:
844:
839:
834:
833:
830:
820:
818:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
789:
783:
782:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
752:
747:
741:
739:
738:
734:
730:
726:
719:
713:
709:
705:
701:
700:its talk page
697:
693:
692:
691:DanBealeCocks
688:
685:
681:
680:
672:
671:
667:
663:
658:
650:
646:
642:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
605:
602:
600:
599:
595:
591:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
564:
560:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
545:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
497:
495:
494:
490:
486:
478:
476:
475:
471:
467:
462:
457:
449:
447:
446:
442:
438:
429:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
408:
406:
405:
401:
397:
392:
386:
384:
383:
379:
375:
367:
365:
364:
359:
354:
343:
342:
335:
331:
323:
317:
314:
312:
307:
301:
300:
299:
298:
295:
292:
290:
285:
279:
278:
277:
276:
273:
271:
266:
256:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
201:
200:
195:
190:
188:
185:
176:
171:
164:
157:
152:
151:
147:
143:
135:
131:
130:
129:
128:
121:
119:
118:
115:
110:
100:Your username
99:
95:
91:
87:
82:
81:
80:
79:
75:
71:
63:
61:
58:
57:
53:
52:
39:
38:
30:
19:
1238:
1221:
1220:
1215:A template,
1214:
1186:
1182:
1146:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1094:
1090:
1062:
1038:
1018:
1001:PeterSymonds
994:
972:
968:
964:
958:
941:TinuCherian
939:
934:
924:
912:
886:
874:
868:
851:
829:
824:
793:
777:
770:Black Falcon
761:
723:
704:my talk page
690:
689:
654:
623:
608:
587:
541:
537:my talk page
502:
501:
482:
461:Bigtimepeace
453:
433:
415:
412:
394:Best wishes
393:
390:
371:
338:
327:
310:
305:STORMTRACKER
288:
283:STORMTRACKER
269:
264:STORMTRACKER
260:
237:
202:
184:
180:
139:
133:
125:
103:
67:
59:
50:
45:
34:
28:
1130:RfA thanks!
980:inthegarden
927:subst:Smile
914:Tinucherian
864:RichardΩ612
848:CSD-tagging
729:Prashanthns
573:72.92.4.157
559:Prashanthns
122:Rfa comment
1259:topic bans
1189:·Add§hore·
1105:supports,
1059:RFA Thanks
963:which was
804:good faith
780:Horologium
702:. Stop by
662:Novan Leon
450:Rfa thanks
437:Novan Leon
244:GameKeeper
189:(Dendodge)
142:SunCreator
1255:site bans
1117:Gatoclass
790:Vandalism
766:Wizardman
417:MalikLove
409:Thank you
387:Thank you
64:Agreement
1167:contribs
1159:jbmurray
1041:red link
969:114/10/4
918:WikiLove
831:Dendodge
760:, which
521:InDeBiz1
505:InDeBiz1
470:contribs
340:Wisdom89
168:You can
86:Blechnic
70:Blechnic
49:Channel
1114:thanks!
374:Ashanda
334:WP:RFCU
1245:. The
1065:Risker
991:My RfA
965:passed
961:my RfA
827:......
762:passed
758:my RfA
628:WP:UAA
330:WP:UAA
257:My RFA
479:Hello
108:Urban
1279:talk
1163:talk
1121:talk
1069:talk
1026:talk
1015:WiPP
1006:talk
892:talk
838:Talk
812:talk
800:here
774:jc37
772:and
733:talk
725:here
666:talk
632:here
594:talk
577:talk
563:talk
525:talk
509:talk
489:talk
485:Jurj
466:talk
441:talk
421:talk
400:talk
378:talk
248:talk
224:talk
209:talk
194:Talk
146:talk
113:Rose
90:talk
74:talk
42:D'oh
1239:Hi,
1200:ont
1103:112
1052:•
468:|
332:vs
240:sig
234:Sig
1281:)
1257:,
1169:)
1165:•
1123:)
1071:)
1043:.
1028:)
1003:|
947:-
894:)
835:..
814:)
768:,
735:)
710:@
708:LA
668:)
641:GB
613:GB
596:)
579:)
565:)
550:!
527:)
511:)
491:)
464:|
443:)
423:)
402:)
380:)
355:/
311:94
289:94
270:94
250:)
226:)
211:)
148:)
92:)
76:)
51:®
1277:(
1198:C
1195:/
1161:(
1119:(
1111:1
1107:2
1067:(
1024:(
890:(
875:ɸ
872:|
869:Ć”
810:(
731:(
664:(
592:(
575:(
561:(
523:(
507:(
487:(
439:(
419:(
398:(
376:(
360:)
350:T
345:(
246:(
222:(
207:(
191:.
165:.
144:(
136:.
88:(
72:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
