Knowledge

User talk:Dwsolo

Source 📝

926:
significant edits that are unrelated to your own interests does give a strong appearance of self-promotion, as I think you'd have to acknowledge. This is not evil, most of us come to Knowledge to pick up on some personal interest, but the mark of a good Wikipedian is that we then reach further and add knowledge or work in other ways to improve the general content outside of our narrow personal interest. The best way to defuse allegations of self-promotion, then, is to go to your music library and add material. Here are a couple of suggestions: there are a number of topics in the music categories that are much less comprehensive that the entries in Grove and other references; if you have a copy of Grove, you could help polish and reference those articles. We have endless articles on pap music which will be forgotten tomorrow (if it lasts even that long), many fewer on music which has remained in performance for hundreds of years. Another thing you could do is to upload scans of notable passages of music. I added
934:. You could do the same. Short excerpts for clearly defined critical commentary, such as a section of Spem which shows the interweaving of the parts, help immeasurably to improve the understanding of the subject. On my to-do list is combing through my library of around a thousand (wow, I was surprised by that, where did they all come from?) scores and songbooks to add value to articles. You can do this as well. Or you could restrict yourself to discussing yourself, adding your name to articles, and adding your own performances, and be dismissed in the end as a self-promoter. Which would be a shame. 512: 331: 473: 292: 672: 430: 249: 823:. Doesn't matter how many he uploads. You can put them on your userpage as well, by the way. To Dwsolo - please continue to upload this media. You are doing the right thing. Jono1970 is severely testing my patience by this unjustified harassment. He needs to stop it, right now. If the media improves the encyclopedia, ulterior motives are irrelevant, even if I assumed bad faith as well. 479: 298: 795:. As I said if he is so knowledgeable about the music he hasn't bothered to do hardly any text contributions. It's not spamming but it's a high degree of self promotion. As for making it a store, I'm more talking about the user page. Anyone can upload their own music but when it comes to an exercise of purely uploading your own works at every opportunity is self promotion. 484: 303: 1381: 1039:
promotion (and I don't mean spamming). This is no different from say a painter uploading his/her own reproductions of famous works onto Wikimedia. You many not be a musicologist Dwsolo, but you obviously have a strong interest and understanding for music, and you are more than welcome to contribute to any music (or other) article in Knowledge.
961:
works of reference, so my humble gleanings would not add to the wikipedia anything that cannot be added by more knowledgeable people with greater historical insight. Everyone has something different to offer the wikiworld, I offer what I have, not what anyone else can obtain simply by dint of research.
1355:
and as for some of the humourless priggery up above, words fail me. Everyone brings to Knowledge what expertise they have. For me, it is mostly digging around in the scientific literature, or a few lucky shots with my camera; if you can bring musical illustrations, you are doing what few of us can,
1038:
I agree with Guy's comments wholeheartedly, I have no problem with anonymous uploaded content but the fact that Dwsolo has almost entirely been uploading his own works (and previously linking to his website) and not contributing to the text of articles is why I think there is a strong element of self
902:
Hi Dwsolo -- I wanted to echo Antandrus, Moreschi, and Mak -- thanks for your audio contributions to articles -- I was just enjoying your El Grillo the other day. I think Jono is misunderstanding the differences between article and media contributions. I think that in the "Media" section, the names
600:
13:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC) He also wrote a song for soprano and lute using the entire set of verses. Granted the original song was a folk ballad, but it was through Dowland's lute duet and soprano and lute song both based on that ballad that the piece remains known in the 21st century. Do you agree? DO
397:
IF you have release rights on the work/sample concerned, it's recommended that you also upload it to a relevant category on Wikimedia Commons, as well as filing an OTRS permission/formal notification of it's release as GFDL or into the public domain, Please ask an administrator if you need assistance
380:
IF you have release rights on the work/sample concerned, it's recommended that you also upload it to a relevant category on Wikimedia Commons, as well as filing an OTRS permission/formal notification of it's release as GFDL or into the public domain, Please ask an administrator if you need assistance
363:
IF you have release rights on the work/sample concerned, it's recommended that you also upload it to a relevant category on Wikimedia Commons, as well as filing an OTRS permission/formal notification of it's release as GFDL or into the public domain, Please ask an administrator if you need assistance
346:
IF you have release rights on the work/sample concerned, it's recommended that you also upload it to a relevant category on Wikimedia Commons, as well as filing an OTRS permission/formal notification of it's release as GFDL or into the public domain, Please ask an administrator if you need assistance
1089:
Hi, it was originally a silly mistake on my part, the song was by Lassus not Sermisy. Sorry .... At some point I'll reupload to the Lassus page (but I'll have to rename the file - can it be renamed in situ at wikip/media or does it have to be reuploaded?) BTW I do have some songs that really are by
1515:
Thank you very much for uploading your enjoyable songs. I found that the links on your user page didn't work; maybe the file naming standard got changed since you put them there. So I changed it into what could be called a "song gallery"; I hope you're fine with that. The buttons are too big for my
1310:, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Knowledge's 1160:
Hi Julia I think that's probably the best solution. I did do my own Wiki page once but it was removed on grounds of self-promotion; however, various Wiki-pages do contain valid wikimedia versions (ogg files) of performances by my one-man choir dwsChorale, most of which were (eventually) accepted by
1053:
I think true self promotion would be the adding of a twentieth recording to a page with too many, or insisting that their performance be used on the page and not someone else's. As long as for the most part Dwsolo is adding the first work or two to pages that could really use some, it seems fine.
738:
Hey, I just want to say that your additions are appreciated, and thank you for uploading them to Knowledge and putting them under a free license. I do think it's better not to put your name on the pages themselves, since we don't do that for writers or photographers, and credit is meant to be given
724:
BTW I am not using wikipedia as a store - the only way to put music on wikipedia is to use ogg files, and I don't use ogg files for anything else: they are no use to me personally since I always use mp3 on my own site. They were made especially for wikipedia because User JzG specifically suggested
1049:
I agree with the perception that DWS's uploads could create for someone who hasn't listened to them, and I also agree that we shouldn't leave editing of music articles to the professional musicologists (they've, er, we've already made a mess of too many other things), but I don't think that anyone
925:
Well, David, as the one who advised you to upload rather than link, I'd like to say that I'm pleased you have chosen to do this - free content is all good. But it is disappointing that you have not chosen to go beyond this and add to the articles themselves; the fact that you have yet to make any
903:
of performers are acceptable, at least I've seen them there for many non-WP created media (there's a lot of U.S. Air Force Band recordings, and they're usually credited on the main page); but I think WP aliases should be avoided and names of groups should only be used if they exist outside WP. --
960:
Hi Guy. Well I'm a performer and composer and not a musicologist. I don't possess a Groves or any other such work and I have never seriously studied the history of music. I offer what I have: my interpretations, not what I might glean from works of reference. Anyone can glean information from
885:
Greetings: just adding my voice here. Dwsolo's contributions are a welcome addition to the project, as long as they are given a free license, as they are, and as long as his name does not appear in the mainspace, and I do not see it. Thank you for recording and uploading these: we need more
1143:
I've put you as in User:Dwsolo with thanks on my user page so I hope that's okay, and summary of what's here after your note on my talk page, to keep the thread of it. I linked to your user page so people will find your website anyway. All cool I hope : ) What you do is very interesting. Best,
1118:
Hi Dwsolo, thanks for bringing that to my attention. Reading your talk page though I'm not sure if linking to your website might be in breach of something. I'm not really au fait with all the ins and outs of this kind of thing but it's reasonable to say who did the song so I will do that. Just
687:
I was informed that putting GFDL performances was permissible. I am not linking to my own site. There are others that link to their site whereas I am simply providing free performances through wikimedia's own system perfectly legitimately. I don't see what your problem is. Even User JzG, after
1057:
It's too bad there's not a collaborative overdubbing/editing service on WP: I think that a few of the pieces could sound a bit better if you recorded most of the parts but then had someone else overdub a superius (mezzo-soprano) on top.  :) I wonder if collaborative recording could make that
984:- the recording there is in need of attention, but it is nevertheless quite interesting as a one-man performance - there may be a better version soon, with assistance from a friend). If you feel that the visualisations there are of any value feel free to add them to the Spem page yourself. 703:, and if someone were to verify where the music came from by looking at your user page they'll find your website. You are definitely not interested in adding the music created by others to build up Knowledge as an encyclopaedia. You also seem to be using Knowledge to store your files 761:
spamming, your contributions are absolutely appreciated, and we postively encourage people to create their own media and add them to articles that need them, provided they are licensed appropriately: this is exactly what you have been doing, so good for you, and please continue!
920:
Thanks Mike and Andtandrus. Although the dwsChorale exists outside WP I'll refrain from adding it in the credits for now in view of the obvious problem that some other WP moderators have in distinguishing bona fide material from advertising :-) Glad you enjoyed El Grillo :-)
547:
In essence what you need to do is a compile a list of the specific files over which you hold rights and have uploaded (or plan to upload), and are prepared to release under GFDL. That list is then sent along with a some simple boiler plate like " I <name:
1587:
I also put a template after the image section to prevent it from running into the song section. I hope I didn't mess around too much with your user page; please let me know if you have any concerns, or if there's anything I can help you with. —
1050:
should be pressured to making the types of contributions they don't feel qualified to or don't want to. I'd rather have someone joyfully recording and uploading some Ravenscroft canons rather than grudgingly correcting commas on the article.
840:
As to adding text, I am not as knowledgeable as you suppose and have nothing to add to those encyclopedia articles apart from my interpretations, which are there by way of illustration. I leave text to those who are more knowledgeable.
401:
BTW You might also wish to indicate, particularly with more recent works, the status of the basis work. Although Elgar died in 1934 (meaning copyright on his works presumably expired in 2005) it would be helpful to users of the sample.
1122:
Perhaps if there is enough credibility from third party sources there might be enough to create an article on the work of your group? Provided it avoids the self-promo, vested interest, not a fan site tags etc etc and meets the
1547: 688:
berating me for originally putting links to my site (now removed) said that it would be a good thing for me to put my performances/recordings on wikimedia commons and link to them - so that is what I have been doing
211:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
1465: 1526: 1554: 374: 203:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 340: 1263:
from Knowledge. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. The external links I reverted were matching the following
1536: 78:
describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Knowledge.
59:
has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
169:. You would, however, be very popular if you were to upload and release some of your recordings into the public domain (provided that you own all the rights to the performance). 437: 256: 122: 1546: 391: 200: 1525: 1459: 978:
Regarding Spem in Alium, You can, if you like, visualise the interweavings within the recording itself on my own site, (which I link to here but not to the Spem page:
538:
click the 'my wathclist' link in the top right of the Mediawiki interface. The Wathclist would only trackpages on the pages you indicated 'Watch This Page' for.
721:
Well I shall not put any more up and I have removed my name from the wikimedia links that are still there. I have effectively anonymised them as far as I can.
550:
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation Licence " to a specfic e-mail address at Knowledge. You would need to ask an admin what this is e-mail address is
1352:(which is what I was doing out there myself, with a camera, one day). I'm very pleased you were able to use the photo - this is what Wikimedia is all about. 1244:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
612:
JD only wrote a set a variations on LordW., so your recording is inappropriate. You should record InDarknessLetMeDwell for Wiki, in your baritone preferably.
862:
Thanks again, Moreschi. There are quite enough uploaded at the moment I fancy, but if you have any special requests later on please let me know by email :-)
62:
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
441:, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. 260:, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. 635:
because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
125:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
523:(PS although I mark each page with "watch this page" I never get any notifications of changes in my email - should I do something to enable this?) 1393: 118: 1574: 357: 52: 1202:
You are awarded an Audio Barnstar for the many a capella audio files you performed on, recorded, mixed and uploaded. Thank you very much!
1348:. That is charming. I hadn't heard the song before, and I shall pass it on immediately to my son, who teaches at the primary school in 435:
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the
254:
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the
235: 1516:
taste; that's the way they come when you don't do anything about them. I experimented a bit with other formats, such as the following:
1188: 503: 491: 322: 310: 1562: 927: 725:
that I should upload to wikimedia (rather than linking) and I discovered that the only way I could do so was to create ogg files.
640: 632: 534:
In response to the second part of your question, the watchlist is not sent by email AFIAK, to view it you need to when logged in,
208: 1315: 787:
Dear all, I would assume good faith if there are a few instances of uploading one's own music etc. but Dwsolo has engaged in a
676: 1410: 1090:
Sermisy, but there should be a link to the Classical Music Archives (www.prs.com) for those, since they are all stored there
224: 204: 63: 544:
Filing an OTRS permission would be an ADDITIONAL step, but recommended given the current complex nature of music licensing.
234:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 1480: 1447: 1307: 511: 330: 24: 188: 1100:
Oh yes, of course...I think it can be moved at the commons but I'm pretty new there so I'm not sure how that's done.
1303: 636: 628: 219: 114: 48: 1570: 680: 35:
text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from
549:
duly authorised to do so, and having appropriate rights to do so, release the following : <list of files: -->
1418: 1299: 1400:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
1441: 541:
In response to the first part of your question, at present you have done everything you need to at present,
95: 70:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at 1437: 1149: 1132: 844:
Anyway, I hope that what I have put on the English wikipedia can stay and I assure you that that's all.
580: 567: 551: 403: 382: 365: 348: 165:. I would also urge you not to use Knowledge for what might be seen as self-promotion. We discourage 1276: 1063: 931: 908: 422:
I received your notification regarding the ogg files that I just uploaded. Apart from adding the tag
32: 1487: 1473: 1280: 1204: 1054:
And, I think linking to DWS and attributing to him may be part of WP's requirement under the GFDL.
1040: 890: 796: 712: 520:(which I have done) is there anything else I should do? If so where do I go? Thanks for your help. 596:
David, Lord W. ballad is certainly NOT by Dowland, even though he wrote a set of variations on it.
189:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3f/Tallis_if_ye_love_me_performed_by_the_dwsChorale.ogg
1589: 1405: 1327: 1104: 1081: 654: 82: 1279:
file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's
1408:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1501: 1401: 1319: 429: 248: 1364: 1284: 1145: 1128: 747: 67: 793:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Dwsolo
1272: 1059: 904: 187:
Hi Guy I have finally worked out how to make an ogg file, which wiki allows. The path is:
1453: 1578: 1292: 1260: 1245: 1124: 887: 231: 166: 162: 671: 1532: 1397: 1385: 1323: 1256: 1101: 1078: 942: 936: 824: 763: 740: 708: 704: 646: 177: 171: 146: 140: 133: 127: 36: 1497: 1311: 613: 597: 571: 495: 314: 579:
Further to this the email you would need to contact is permissions@wikimedia.org
1545: 1524: 1428: 1360: 1226: 1165: 1091: 1018: 876: 845: 775: 744: 728: 689: 602: 524: 71: 56: 44: 28: 17: 1414:
article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the
1345: 1268: 865:
Meanwhile I shall have a bit of a rest and maybe do some composing of my own.
1295:, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. 1283:
and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our
1187: 886:
people doing this. Free content is how we survive and grow. Best wishes,
1349: 1380: 195:
License tagging for Image:Elgar The Snow performed by the dwsChorale.ogg
40: 451://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License 270://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License 1077:
Why did you remove your recording of this from the Sermisy article?
1073:
removal of Sermisy_bonjour_mon_coeur_performed_by_the_dwsChorale.ogg
1592: 1505: 1368: 1331: 1234: 1211: 1173: 1153: 1136: 1107: 1094: 1084: 1067: 1043: 1021: 947: 912: 893: 879: 848: 827: 799: 778: 766: 752: 731: 715: 692: 660: 616: 605: 583: 574: 554: 527: 406: 385: 368: 351: 182: 151: 103: 1264: 601:
you also agree that it is therefore relevant to the Dowland page?
375:
Image:Paxton Breathe soft ye winds performed by the dwsChorale.ogg
981: 502:
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed.
321:
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed.
1287:
facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also
563: 341:
Image:Sermisy bonjour mon coeur performed by the dwsChorale.ogg
215:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
1161:
editors here. So we can leave it at that for now. Many thanks.
467: 424: 286: 243: 683:
from editing. for self promotion on various music articles.
707:. The only reason you make it GFDL is to promote your work. 161:
Please do not add links to your own sites, it is considered
358:
Image:Stanford The bluebird performed by the dwsChorale.ogg
1271:). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a 774:
Many thanks to Mak and Moreschi for your kind support :-)
643:
if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
1255:
was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
739:
on the "image" pages. I would remind Jono to remember to
699:
The point is you are continually adding music created by
27:! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 1384:
Hello Dwsolo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
1252: 792: 1472: 1344:
very many thanks for your message giving the link to
113:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
392:
Image:Elgar_The_Snow_performed_by_the_dwsChorale.ogg
201:
Image:Elgar The Snow performed by the dwsChorale.ogg
191:
Is that acceptable? Attached now - I trust it's OK?
1392:of the articles that you created is tagged as an 639:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 37:http://www.classicalarchives.com/inspire/gold.html 459:This template should only be used on file pages. 278:This template should only be used on file pages. 837:As I said, I shall not be uploading any more. 109:Image:Delian games 2006.jpg listed for deletion 1486: 8: 623:Possibly unfree Image:Delian_games_2006.jpg 496:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 315:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 1346:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM-qcS1eBs8 1269:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ay0suokux0 564:http://meta.wikimedia.org/OTRS#Permissions 510: 482: 477: 471: 329: 301: 296: 290: 1561: 1394:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 1185: 1119:checking, it's the dwsChorale, is it? 627:An image that you uploaded or altered, 119:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion 1223:I've added it to my personal page :-) 1404:, all biographies should be based on 1318:. For more information about me, see 1314:for more information, and consult my 1127:requirements. Just a thought. Cheers 41:http://newmusicclassics.com/gold.html 7: 66:, you can comment to that effect on 791:history of uploading his own music 236:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 31:, but we regretfully cannot accept 815:. It is not self-promotion. It is 14: 1316:list of frequently-reverted sites 930:with some critical commentary in 1543: 1522: 1379: 1298:If you were trying to insert an 1186: 675:Please stop. If you continue to 670: 633:Knowledge:Possibly unfree images 494:, it may also be used under the 428: 313:, it may also be used under the 247: 928:Image:Duruflé-Requiem-Kirie.jpg 743:of other contributors. Cheers, 230:This is an automated notice by 1369:19:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 448:GNU Free Documentation License 438:GNU Free Documentation License 267:GNU Free Documentation License 257:GNU Free Documentation License 225:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1: 1593:17:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 1398:biographies of living persons 1337:Thanks for the bell peal link 1293:guidelines for external links 1506:23:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 1174:05:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 1154:01:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 1137:01:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC) 1108:15:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1095:05:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 1085:19:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 666:Warning about self promotion 104:15:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 43:. As a copyright violation, 677:add promotional material to 629:Image:Delian_games_2006.jpg 238:. 08:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 138:08:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 115:Image:Delian games 2006.jpg 1608: 1424:tag. Here is the article: 1332:16:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 1302:that does comply with our 817:improving the encyclopedia 220:Knowledge:Image use policy 1571:Charles Villiers Stanford 1267:: \byoutube\.com (links: 1192: 1068:05:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1044:00:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1022:18:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 948:18:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 913:13:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 894:04:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 880:13:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 849:06:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 828:11:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 800:05:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 779:15:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 767:14:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 753:13:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 732:10:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 716:07:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 693:20:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 183:09:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 152:08:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1312:external links guideline 1235:09:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1230: 1212:22:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 1169: 661:17:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 617:11:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 606:13:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 584:10:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 575:09:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 555:09:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 528:09:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 492:eligible for relicensing 407:09:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 386:09:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 369:09:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 352:09:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 311:eligible for relicensing 53:speedy deletion criteria 679:Knowledge, you will be 566:on how to proceed with 47:appears to qualify for 1555:Breathe soft, ye winds 821:need these audio files 637:image description page 209:image description page 631:, has been listed at 199:Thanks for uploading 117:, has been listed at 1058:possible. Best, -- 25:welcome to Knowledge 1248:has been reverted. 1196:The Audio Barnstar 757:To Dwsolo: you are 1388:alerting you that 1291:deprecated by our 1585: 1584: 1548: 1527: 1492: 1375:Unreferenced BLPs 1356:and many thanks. 1220:Many thanks :-) 1217: 1216: 1066: 946: 932:Requiem (Duruflé) 911: 741:assume good faith 705:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 658: 518: 517: 466: 465: 337: 336: 285: 284: 181: 150: 137: 121:. Please see the 1599: 1581:(Op. 119 No 3.) 1567: 1565: 1550: 1549: 1529: 1528: 1519: 1518: 1491: 1490: 1476: 1432: 1423: 1417: 1406:reliable sources 1383: 1281:copyright policy 1210: 1190: 1183: 1182: 1114:Acknowledgements 1062: 940: 907: 750: 674: 659: 652: 649: 581:ShakespeareFan00 568:ShakespeareFan00 552:ShakespeareFan00 514: 507: 490:If this file is 486: 485: 481: 480: 475: 474: 468: 461: 460: 452: 449: 446: 432: 425: 404:ShakespeareFan00 398:in doing that. 383:ShakespeareFan00 366:ShakespeareFan00 349:ShakespeareFan00 333: 326: 309:If this file is 305: 304: 300: 299: 294: 293: 287: 280: 279: 271: 268: 265: 251: 244: 175: 144: 131: 99: 92: 87: 81: 68:Talk:Edward Gold 1607: 1606: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1563: 1544: 1523: 1513: 1433: 1421: 1419:unreferencedBLP 1415: 1377: 1339: 1242: 1203: 1181: 1116: 1075: 748: 735: 668: 647: 644: 625: 594: 501: 483: 478: 472: 462: 458: 457: 454: 450: 447: 444: 417: 395: 381:in doing that. 378: 364:in doing that. 361: 347:in doing that. 344: 320: 302: 297: 291: 281: 277: 276: 273: 269: 266: 263: 207:applied to the 197: 159: 111: 102: 97: 88: 83: 79: 49:speedy deletion 21: 12: 11: 5: 1605: 1603: 1583: 1582: 1579:Mary Coleridge 1568: 1558: 1557: 1551: 1540: 1539: 1530: 1512: 1509: 1494: 1493: 1376: 1373: 1338: 1335: 1277:sound or video 1257:unwanted links 1246:William Shield 1241: 1238: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1199: 1198: 1193: 1191: 1180: 1179:Audio Barnstar 1177: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1156: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1074: 1071: 1047: 1046: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 979: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 951: 950: 918: 917: 916: 915: 897: 896: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 866: 863: 854: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 805: 804: 803: 802: 772: 771: 770: 769: 727: 719: 718: 686: 667: 664: 641:the discussion 624: 621: 620: 619: 593: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 577: 536: 535: 516: 515: 508: 500: 487: 476: 464: 463: 456: 455: 442: 433: 416: 413: 411: 394: 389: 377: 372: 360: 355: 343: 338: 335: 334: 327: 319: 306: 295: 283: 282: 275: 274: 261: 252: 228: 227: 222: 196: 193: 158: 157:External links 155: 110: 107: 94: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1604: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1552: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1537:If ye love me 1534: 1531: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1510: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1435:Find sources: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1402:verifiability 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1374: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1353: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300:external link 1296: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1275:file (e.g. a 1274: 1270: 1266: 1265:regex rule(s) 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1247: 1239: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1221: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1189: 1184: 1178: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1120: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1072: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060:Myke Cuthbert 1055: 1051: 1045: 1042: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 983: 982:Spem in Alium 980: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 949: 944: 939: 938: 933: 929: 924: 923: 922: 914: 910: 906: 905:Myke Cuthbert 901: 900: 899: 898: 895: 892: 889: 884: 883: 882: 881: 878: 867: 864: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 852: 850: 847: 842: 838: 829: 826: 822: 818: 814: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 801: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 780: 777: 768: 765: 760: 756: 755: 754: 751: 746: 742: 737: 736: 733: 730: 726: 722: 717: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 694: 691: 684: 682: 678: 673: 665: 663: 662: 656: 651: 650: 642: 638: 634: 630: 622: 618: 615: 611: 610: 609: 607: 604: 599: 591: 585: 582: 578: 576: 573: 569: 565: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 553: 545: 542: 539: 533: 532: 531: 529: 526: 521: 513: 509: 505: 499: 497: 493: 488: 470: 469: 453: 440: 439: 434: 431: 427: 426: 423: 420: 415:GFDL question 414: 412: 409: 408: 405: 399: 393: 390: 388: 387: 384: 376: 373: 371: 370: 367: 359: 356: 354: 353: 350: 342: 339: 332: 328: 324: 318: 316: 312: 307: 289: 288: 272: 259: 258: 253: 250: 246: 245: 242: 239: 237: 233: 226: 223: 221: 218: 217: 216: 213: 210: 206: 202: 194: 192: 190: 185: 184: 179: 174: 173: 168: 167:autobiography 164: 156: 154: 153: 148: 143: 142: 135: 130: 129: 124: 120: 116: 108: 106: 105: 101: 100: 93: 91: 86: 77: 73: 69: 65: 60: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 19: 16: 1586: 1575:The Bluebird 1514: 1511:Song gallery 1495: 1483: 1477: 1469: 1462: 1456: 1450: 1444: 1434: 1409: 1389: 1378: 1358: 1354: 1343: 1340: 1322:. Thanks! -- 1297: 1288: 1250: 1243: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1206: 1195: 1164: 1123:objectivity/ 1121: 1117: 1088: 1076: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1033: 1001:Kind regards 935: 919: 875: 868:Kind regards 853: 843: 839: 836: 820: 816: 812: 788: 773: 758: 723: 720: 700: 685: 669: 645: 626: 595: 546: 543: 540: 537: 522: 519: 504:You can help 489: 443: 436: 421: 418: 410: 400: 396: 379: 362: 345: 323:You can help 308: 262: 255: 240: 229: 214: 198: 186: 170: 160: 139: 126: 112: 96: 89: 84: 75: 61: 22: 1577:- words by 1460:free images 1429:Edward Gold 1359:--Stephen ( 1320:my FAQ page 1146:Julia Rossi 1129:Julia Rossi 813:No it isn't 570:'s advice. 562:Please see 72:Edward Gold 57:Edward Gold 45:Edward Gold 33:copyrighted 29:Edward Gold 23:Hello, and 18:Edward Gold 1308:guidelines 1251:Your edit 1240:March 2009 1125:notability 888:Antandrus 592:Willoughby 241:Tag added 123:discussion 51:under the 1590:Sebastian 1553:Paxton - 1496:Thanks!-- 1102:Rigadoun 1079:Rigadoun 232:OrphanBot 205:image tag 1350:Northlew 1341:David-- 1324:XLinkBot 1304:policies 1289:strongly 1205:Channel 1041:Jono1970 825:Moreschi 797:Jono1970 764:Moreschi 713:Jono1970 701:yourself 648:howcheng 498:license. 317:license. 163:spamming 90:spinster 1498:DASHBot 1466:WP refs 1454:scholar 851:dwsolo 781:dwsolo 734:dwsolo 695:dwsolo 681:blocked 614:Galassi 608:dwsolo 598:Galassi 572:Somitho 530:dwsolo 1564:noicon 1533:Tallis 1438:Google 1396:. The 1361:seglea 1285:upload 1227:Dwsolo 1166:Dwsolo 1105:(talk) 1092:Dwsolo 1082:(talk) 1064:(talk) 1024:dwsolo 1019:Dwsolo 909:(talk) 891:(talk) 877:Dwsolo 846:Dwsolo 776:Dwsolo 749:(talk) 729:Dwsolo 709:WP:COI 690:Dwsolo 603:Dwsolo 525:Dwsolo 1481:JSTOR 1442:books 1273:media 943:Help! 819:. We 178:Help! 147:Help! 134:Help! 85:disco 76:after 1502:talk 1474:FENS 1448:news 1365:talk 1328:talk 1306:and 1261:spam 1259:and 1253:here 1231:talk 1170:talk 1150:talk 1133:talk 789:long 655:chat 445:GFDL 264:GFDL 98:talk 64:GFDL 39:and 1488:TWL 1411:686 1386:bot 1139:'s 937:Guy 759:not 745:Mak 548:--> 419:Hi 172:Guy 141:Guy 128:Guy 80:... 1573:- 1535:- 1504:) 1468:) 1431:- 1422:}} 1416:{{ 1371:) 1367:) 1330:) 1233:) 1207:® 1172:) 1152:) 1135:) 711:. 74:, 55:. 1500:( 1484:· 1478:· 1470:· 1463:· 1457:· 1451:· 1445:· 1440:( 1390:1 1363:( 1326:( 1229:( 1168:( 1148:( 1131:( 945:) 941:( 657:} 653:{ 506:. 325:. 180:) 176:( 149:) 145:( 136:) 132:(

Index

Edward Gold
welcome to Knowledge
Edward Gold
copyrighted
http://www.classicalarchives.com/inspire/gold.html
http://newmusicclassics.com/gold.html
Edward Gold
speedy deletion
speedy deletion criteria
Edward Gold
GFDL
Talk:Edward Gold
Edward Gold
discospinster
talk
15:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Delian games 2006.jpg
Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
discussion
Guy
Help!
Guy
Help!
08:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
spamming
autobiography
Guy
Help!
09:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3f/Tallis_if_ye_love_me_performed_by_the_dwsChorale.ogg

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.