204:. I understand your point; but my synopsis is a complete and total spoiler, which people could inadvertently read while reading about the novel in general. I'm very interested on your take on this because I have similar synopis for the other novels in the Dune sequence. I'm new to the Knowledge, so forgive my mistakes.
499:
Hi. Thanks for pointing out my mistake with 2toise's talk page. I've moved my comment. But what should I do about the page I mistakenly posted to originally? Simply remove all the content, or do I delete the whole thing somehow? (As you can probably tell from all this, I'm not too clear on how these
390:
Hello
Dysprosia! About the list mania. I'm glad you agree with me in the biracial people nonsense. I had an idea to create a WIKILISTS, like wikctionary or wikiquote. It could even be WIKITRIVIA. Nobody listened, except you i guess. Will you do some lobbying with me? I supose you are a sysop, so you
305:
Even if the material is changed, the page must still be deleted because the copyrighted material is still in the page history. On all those websites where the text is on, it says "Columbia
Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, Copyright (c) 2003." That means Knowledge can't place it under the GFDL without
487:
And of course you learn a little either by editing, or seeing what your colleagues edit as you go out the door. Once i look at your edit, i have a clearer recollection of having seen 404 after all -- once, maybe twice -- and a much better feel for what made a previous editor make that analogy.
444:
Sorry, I just realised that in reverting
Pakaran's revert at the village pump I removed your last comment which I didn't realise was there. Anyway, the reason Paul removed the section originally was because it should have been reported at Sourceforge, not there, which is what I assume what he is
483:
No, don't be sorry; i probably should remember what may mama told me, and speak more politely to strangers. I enjoyed your humor, and hoped to reciprocate -- by joking about how little knowledge of the subject matter it takes to do something that is (hopefully!) an improvement.
289:; the same notice you see under each page you edit here. If you post copyrighted material - a contribution - it is a violation of this because you don't own the copyrights to the material so you cannot release it under the GFDL.
403:. You'll get plenty of eyes looking over your proposal. If you put some comments around, I'll give you some support, since if it seems so popular; that many are creating so many lists, I'm sure it'd get a lot of contributors! :)
112:
I have nothing personally against it - however if these works have not entered widespread knowledge/publicity &/c, and that not many have heard of it, it probably is not suitable for inclusion in the
Knowledge.
207:
Do you see that this will have similar content duplicated? Having duplicated content makes it harder to maintain, track, and update. We already have the procedure where we put a spoiler note in (as you can see on
73:
Okay, well, I suggest you make mention of it at the
Starckdeutsch page, and how it relates to dadaism. If you point me to some web links about Starckdeutsch and Koeppel, I'll try and add some stuff too. Thanks :)
556:
Hey! Thanks for the support! I'm really wondering about this... Can it be reverted if things get out of hand for me? Sometimes i wonder if this wiki-business is more a curse or a blessing in my life...
343:'s petty fiddling with my user page a few days ago, and your reversion of it. Just wanted to let you know I appreciated it, and I'll do the same for you sometime if necessary. :) Many thanks --
215:
As to the other novels, not many of them are actual links, so perhaps putting a non-spoily introduction in, warn for spoilers, then launch into the synopsis may be a good structure to follow.
564:
You mean lose your admin powers? Yes, you can do so if you wish, but I don't know what good that will do - being an admin isn't an obligation to use your powers, just the possibility that you
321:
O.K. I understood. Next time I'll do it in my sandbox. Only now I can see how it is so quickly here. When I try to edit, someone else do it for me a second later. Ben Hteva.
258:
Do you know when will the Season IV be on? Or maybe we could add a timeline of the first 3 seasons? but I don't know the date, do u know that? well, So far as i know, it's
528:, this is apparently a single mission out of a video game. If this is correct, it should be removed completely and folded into the main game article -- if there is one.
328:
That's okay -- but even better, you could edit it offline in a text editor so you can update and modify it at will before you submit -- no edit conflicts! :)
508:
I've deleted it. As to talk pages, there's two ways of getting to them; click the User link, then the "Discuss this page" link, or going User_talk:
382:
As I think you found out, just because I run a company doesn't mean I'm a bad guy! I do have things to offer. Thanks for the welcome and the tip.
251:
I don't have much time on my hands at the moment, but it looks like a great site. Will check out formatting conventions as suggested. Thanks. =)
277:
Whether you use Kazaa or not, is not the point, I'm afraid. You can't add copyrighted material, where you do not own the copyrights, here
535:*makes helpless faces* I don't know anything about the Battle of Chang Ban, I merely copyedited it and made it look pretty, s'all...
424:
163:
after I filled it in! I know next to nothing about
Knowledge but I'm going to try to flesh out that article a little more soon.
412:
32:
568:
do so because you are a trusted member of the community is enough (I think this is correct, this is how I feel anyway) :)
121:
59:
292:
If you take the material you have written and remove any vestiges of copied material - it should be okay to put back.
28:
269:
No idea, unfortunately. I don't get to watch it much, and we're getting repeats (I think) here in
Australia...
69:
Well: It comes from a notable direction of language in
Germany called dadaism. What do you know about that?
400:
558:
416:
392:
375:
545:
383:
164:
135:
391:
will get more atention than me. Where do you think i could post this proposal to get atention? Cheers,
138:. Anyway, at least leave the pages and allow everyone here to vote, because that would be something a
529:
282:
83:
525:
17:
313:
Yes, that's what I'm suggesting - move the Talk "clean" copy back after the original is deleted.
178:
102:
475:
Aww, it was just a little humor, didn't mean anything nasty by it. Sorry if you thought I did.
263:
218:
It's not really a mistake, in any case! :) Kudos for adding a lot of good content, keep it up!
549:
411:
Good morning! I followed your suggestion and added a proposal to
Village Pump. I also created
344:
307:
98:
106:
186:
471:
ugliness; i click Save Page. Where does remembering or forgetting anything come into it?
428:
340:
242:
232:
581:
569:
536:
516:
476:
454:
436:
404:
352:
329:
314:
299:
270:
219:
171:
152:
128:
90:
75:
63:
201:
501:
252:
246:
209:
197:
446:
226:
492:
295:
Those 86 different websites, by the way, are in violation of their copyright.
245:, either...I was in a lousy mood when I put that comment on the talk section.
236:
185:
Uh, Dysprosia? My name's Ke_l_vin, not Kevin. But everyone gets that wrong.
139:
467:
Forget?? Hey, Random Page dumps an ugly mess on my desk; i turn it into an
445:
going to do now. Hope you don't mind. Just put the section back if you do.
287:
all contributions to
Knowledge are considered to be released under the GFDL
170:
Hey, I can't take all the credit :) I just helped push the ball rolling :)
365:
262:'s original series, as every time it was on, that message appeared. :D --
259:
160:
105:. I wrote the Tennerel texts and am a co-author of the five series of
281:- not even if you're going to change them afterward, the GFDL (see
142:
453:
It's okay - doesn't matter all that much, I was just curious :)
116:
If you feel otherwise, let me know, I will replace the articles
361:
145:
512:
in the address field after http://www.wikipedia.org/.
378:
21:40, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)Christopher (SableSythesis)
225:I'll merge the two pages together as you suggest.
364:for my take on whether the definition was NPOV.
41:What is is wrong with article "STARCKDEUTSCH"?
8:
58:You may want to discuss the article too at
124:and let the Knowledge community decide.
89:BTW you can sign with 4 tildes: ~~~~ :)
54:Has it been created by someone notable?
159:Thanks so much for editing and fixing
62:. Don't forget to sign your edits! :)
463:"how could we forget the humble 404?"
7:
423:D, thanks for your help cleaning up
372:Thank you for your helpful message.
241:Yeah, don't worry about my part in
134:Author of Tennerel - Ask anyone at
24:
425:Penis-melting Zionist robot combs
306:permission, so it can't be here.
151:Ok, at your request I'll do so.
109:. What do you have against it?
413:Knowledge:Wikitrivia discussion
351:Aww, is nothin :) Glad to help
212:), this should be sufficient.
196:You suggested that I merge the
33:User_talk:Dysprosia/Archive_(2)
1:
360:Please see the Talk page for
339:Dysprosia, I just discovered
122:Knowledge:Votes for deletion
60:Knowledge:Votes for deletion
580:Thank you for the welcome!
29:User_talk:Dysprosia/Archive
598:
552:02:41, Oct 30, 2003 (UTC)
449:02:25, Oct 26, 2003 (UTC)
584:11:49, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
546:m:Talk:Development status
504:08:39, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
500:Talk pages work. :-) ) -
495:05:16, 2003 Oct 26 (UTC)
431:01:03, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
419:07:39, 27 Oct 2003 (UTC)
395:12:04, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
368:15:23, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
347:15:57, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
317:11:29, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
310:11:28, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
302:11:24, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
273:11:48, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)
266:11:44, 20 Oct 2003 (UTC)
222:11:26, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
181:14:26, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
174:08:32, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
167:04:38, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
155:00:16, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)
131:02:59, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
93:10:14, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
86:10:13, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
66:10:02, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
572:10:44, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)
539:21:31, 28 Oct 2003 (UTC)
519:08:41, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
491:Which is to say: TNX! --
479:03:55, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
457:02:32, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
439:01:12, 26 Oct 2003 (UTC)
407:12:06, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
355:22:29, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
332:11:38, 21 Oct 2003 (UTC)
78:10:10, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
264:FallingInLoveWithPitoc
136:Evansville Day School
27:Old talk in archive:
544:Question for you on
530:User:Maury Markowitz
415:for debate. Cheers,
283:Knowledge:Copyrights
189:15:23, 15 Oct 2003
120:I will list them on
97:I wrote the info on
526:Battle of Chang Ban
18:User talk:Dysprosia
235:- not a problem.
51:Is it widely used?
48:Is it well known?
589:
399:Stick it on the
177:I'm silsor now.
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
243:Bernard Hopkins
233:Bernard Hopkins
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
578:
576:
574:
573:
559:Muriel Gottrop
554:
542:
541:
540:
522:
521:
520:
513:
497:
481:
480:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
442:
441:
440:
421:
417:Muriel Gottrop
409:
408:
393:Muriel Gottrop
388:
380:
376:SableSynthesis
370:
358:
357:
356:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
323:
322:
275:
256:
191:
183:
157:
95:
80:
79:
56:
55:
52:
49:
40:
38:
35:(most recent)
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
585:
583:
577:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
553:
551:
547:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
527:
518:
514:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
496:
494:
489:
485:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
462:
461:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
426:
420:
418:
414:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
387:
385:
384:Mike Schinkel
379:
377:
373:
369:
367:
363:
354:
350:
349:
348:
346:
342:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
320:
319:
318:
316:
311:
309:
303:
301:
296:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
274:
272:
267:
265:
261:
255:
254:
249:
248:
244:
239:
238:
234:
229:
228:
223:
221:
216:
213:
211:
205:
203:
202:Dune Synopsis
199:
194:
190:
188:
182:
180:
175:
173:
168:
166:
165:24.153.54.176
162:
156:
154:
149:
147:
144:
141:
137:
132:
130:
125:
123:
119:
114:
110:
108:
104:
100:
94:
92:
87:
85:
77:
72:
71:
70:
67:
65:
61:
53:
50:
47:
46:
45:
42:
37:
36:
34:
30:
19:
579:
575:
565:
555:
550:Tim Starling
543:
523:
509:
498:
490:
486:
482:
468:
466:
443:
435:no probs :)
422:
410:
401:Village pump
389:
386:25 Oct 2003
381:
374:
371:
359:
345:Jwrosenzweig
338:
312:
308:Evil saltine
304:
297:
294:
291:
286:
285:) says that
278:
276:
268:
257:
250:
240:
230:
224:
217:
214:
206:
198:Dune (novel)
195:
192:
184:
176:
169:
158:
150:
133:
126:
117:
115:
111:
96:
88:
81:
68:
57:
43:
39:
26:
25:
193:Dysprosia,
187:Kelvin_Palm
103:Tenerelarth
429:Paul Klenk
341:Mythrandia
200:page with
84:Simone hye
582:Dmbaguley
570:Dysprosia
537:Dysprosia
517:Dysprosia
477:Dysprosia
469:organized
455:Dysprosia
437:Dysprosia
405:Dysprosia
353:Dysprosia
330:Dysprosia
315:Dysprosia
300:Dysprosia
271:Dysprosia
220:Dysprosia
172:Dysprosia
153:Dysprosia
140:democracy
129:Dysprosia
91:Dysprosia
76:Dysprosia
64:Dysprosia
510:username
260:Showtime
161:Jon Frum
107:Tennerel
99:Hrucidek
515:HTH :)
502:Vardion
298:Thanks
253:Tlogmer
127:Thanks
447:Angela
279:at all
227:ChrisG
179:Silsor
44:Well:
548:. --
493:Jerzy
237:RickK
143:would
16:<
366:Noel
247:John
210:Dune
101:and
566:can
524:Re
427:.
231:Re:
118:but
82:OK
31:--
362:SP
148:.
146:do
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.