User talk:EVula/Oct-Dec 2008

4099:

and C++ developers just like myself all over the globe, but people RESPECT me, and I am not getting that here. And there is not a conflict with you or your decision, just the general attitude that the other users do not assume I have good intentions, or am competent enough to decide whether a vandal should be blocked, or something of this nature. I make two mistakes in the past, and suddenly there are pile-ons, which are NOT allowed on Knowledge, and you expect me to be happy about this? Then you criticize me about my reaction when I am told that I am not experienced enough to edit an encyclopedia?

29: 4056:

whatever, it's not worthit, when people disrespect me, I don't really want to keep coming back to the website that repeatedly makes me feel like my degrees are just pieces of paper with writing on them, and nothing more. So, just forget it, as I am obviously not wanted here, by people like Roux, and by the way, what a welcoming talk page, thanks for pointing out one edit I made to it so this campaign could fail. I appreciate it. Glad I wasted six months of my life working on this crap just to be rejected.

6519: 6469: 126: 3089: 4118:, and that your statements of your achievements aren't necessarily entirely in accord with the reality on the ground. I actually pointed out several mistakes you've made, not just one. Bottom line: you're not ready to have the extra access that admins get. Nor am I, for that matter. It's nothing personal. Real-life achievements don't necessarily translate well onto Knowledge. Our collaborative work environment isn't the same as a real-world one. // 6058: 2123: 89: 3701: 3614: 3903: 474: 6164: 4969:). move-rootuserpages means that you can move a user's main userpage, and the sub-pages will go with it (I believe). reupload-shared means that you can override a file name that exists on Commons. Some of the others don't appear to have any function on Knowledge; we don't use trackbacks, and an admin isn't likely to be using Knowledge's APIs under normal circumstances (apihighlimits). 1758: 6247: 5338: 6270:

Hi EVula. I made a request for a name change, following a request from someone claiming to be an administrator on the German wikipedia. I've attempted to check to verify it isn't just some random guy wanting my username. However, from the look of things, I have been around at least a year longer than

4238:

Sorry, I used the same information from my facebook profile which I created a long time ago. I didn't even type that information, my brother used this account long before me, and I am 13 years older than him. He was the one who originally created this account. Even though it is none of your business.

4098:

Yeah, don't edit anymore, as you don't need me. That's what you just said. Doesn't work well in a Collaborative work environment? You realize that I run a corporation with over 500+ employees I have to "manage" daily, which is in Real Life, not just the internet. I have to collaborate with other Java

2999:

file (28 by 21 inches at 72 dpi, which is about right for a 5MP camera). The strangest thing about the image from a technical standpoint is that it was done in December 2007 and uploaded October 2008 (the info template says this, and is corroborated by the metadata), but that's a pretty weak thing to

1264:

I'm well aware of what my position of administrator allows (and doesn't allow) me to do; it's an ephemeral position, one that can be revoked at any time by the community at large, but I'm not abusing my status in any way. You're simply out of line by making presumptions about other editors, and while

917:

Jessica was not Niki's twin, so there is nothing to contradict what has been stated on the show. Writers have said that Niki is dead for good, so it is either Tracy or Barbara. Saying that it could be someone else would be speculation on your part. If you're going to use that logic for Tracy/Barbara,

4477:

That actually means a lot to me; I was looking my RfB over after this topic was posted, and your opposition was the only that I felt still had a particular edget to it after withdrawal (versus some of the ones that were redacted... and then there was the lone oppose !vote that was rather confusing).

3871:

Just as an extra (and unecessary) comment, RfA's closed as no-consensus don't need a closing comment except under truly exceptional circumstances. If an RfA is closed at no-consensus, it means the closing 'crat has read through the discussion and come to the conclusion that the community hasn't come

1027:

is so great is that most of the characters are morally ambiguous; Noah Bennet started out as a bad guy who later evolved into a somewhat good guy, while Sylar is an absolute badass that tried really, really hard to be a good guy (and failed, but still). Micah and Monica were both rather "we can make

5503:

Hi there. Thanks again for nominating me. I have a question. I'd like to test some improvements to the site layout, like for example, put a background image behind the logo, image that would spread from the left to the right of the screen. So my question is: where can I find the css file?... Thanks

2033:

I am canvassing a few bureaucrats about an issue. My personal ID now appears on a certain "watch" site. I have been outed, to put it bluntly. I'm actually not sure why I am considered a "leader" of "the hive." Should I go ahead and post my real name on my user page? My real concern is for family

1215:

My edits were ment to be forms of suggestions. Edits like these fall under the category of edits I would not change back if they are reverted.If you simpily ask me I will stop changing your userpage. HOWEVER, I think Radiant can speak for him/her self. There is no need for you to go and yell at me,

933:

Okay, that's ridiculous; we have zilch evidence that the other characters aren't who they appear to be, whereas we don't know the actual identity of Larter's character in that dream. If we're going to make wild claims like that, let's just say it was Parkman's dad giving her the vision in the first

5970:

I never know how to handle it when I don't hear back from someone; I don't want to nag if you're aware, but I don't want to just say nothing if you just forgot either. Regarding my email, if you've just got higher priorities ATM, that's cool, just trying to tie up loose ends before I leave for the

4541:

sites, used by lots of people and certified as trustworthy (to varying degrees and depending on what we're talking about; IMDb is notoriously bad for stuff that hasn't been released yet, but is solid for existing films). TMDb is a new site with no notability (there aren't any neutral third parties

5752:

Yeah, not long after I got my Wikiquote sysop bit, I went thru the past couple of months' VfDs and made sure that all Knowledge links were cut, as well as killing all interwiki links to the deleted articles. Now I just keep an eye on VfDs as they get closed down (and of course do it as part of my

1473:

have to make modifications to a user's page, follow it up immediately with a message on their talk page; I'll readily admit to being pretty pissed off that you edited my page without even telling me (it was damn near a full day before I even noticed that you'd made the edit; with 2700 items on my

5096:

He's well within his right to remove my comment (though it comes across as being a dick); as far as I'm concerned, it's an acknowledgment for reading the message, so any follow-up discussion is just as actionable as if he'd responded. I'm not familiar enough with his other edits to be much of an

4819:

Hey EVula, this is one of my legitimate Socks for NitrogenTSRH, not a vandal account, and because I cannot edit on NitrogenTSRH, I would just like to tell you that I am sorry that this whole thing has escalated this far, and I would like to just bury the hatchet; I am truly sorry for everything.

4510:

Hey EVula, I am not sure why the link I added for Fight Club was against any kind of posting guidelines... I gave the link external linking guide a thorough read and consider it match all 4 of the points under "What should be linked". Could you please outline why this link was removed? If IMDb,

4055:

No, not worthit, obviously I am not "experienced" enough to be on wikipedia, so just forget me making any more contribs on this site. I am just disrespected and told I have no experience in wikicode or administration of a website on any level when I have a masters degree in those subjects. But,

2759:

usually aren't appreciated, especially from admins. The admin took an increasingly aggressive tone leading up to this personal attack, when I had the audacity to question his additions, and attempt to enforce Knowledge's most basic rule. I feel as if an apology is owed at the very least, and

3494:

Yeah, I've been blowing off my Wikia stuff in favor of the WMF projects I'm active on... I'll pop over tonight when I get home from dinner. Thanks for the heads up; it's fairly easy to forget that I have pending messages on Wikia, versus Knowledge, when I'm on at least five times a day. :)

2625:

Thanks for the note. Yes, they are able to remove - but in this case it seemed appropriate to restore the note. The editor has done nothing but spam links in recent months, and (as you said) is close to a block. It was either restore the note, or add an identical one from me. Thanks again.

5600: 4478:

I try pretty hard to live up to the (perhaps mistaken) perception of bureaucrats are the "cream of the crop;" it's nice to know that I'm fairly successful. I'm planning on my next six months being just as sane as the last six, so here's hoping I continue to deserve your respect. :)

2517:“Who am I? I am Susan Ivanova. Commander. Daughter of Andrei and Sofie Ivanov. I am the right hand of vengeance and the boot that's going to kick your sorry ass all the way back to Earth. I am death incarnate and the last living thing that you are ever going to see. God sent me!” 1032:

something with both characters; maybe they'll come back at some point, maybe they'll become feasts for Sylar, dunno. For now, though, I'm kind of happy that that entire thread has been cut (including Niki getting killed), though I'm still pissed at how abruptly they offed DL.

4790:

short block (in this case, three hours) once I've established that someone's got an axe to grind (it wasn't their first edit to the article with the exact same content). Sends the message that we're serious about vandalism a lot more than fifty "hey, please stop" templates.

2049:

I wouldn't; just because your name is out there doesn't mean you need to draw additional attention to it. (I've been "outed" already, but it's considerably less impressive, since my real name is rather easily found, though I don't have it anywhere obvious in my userspace)

4655:

Wow, I'd totally forgotten about that. We've since moved work, so it's not as convenient as it used to be, but I'll still try to get you that picture; I'm busy during the week (and it gets dark much earlier now), but I'm not doing anything next weekend. Sorry. :\

2943:

was petty, it came across as if they said "A Nobody is rather petty". Not the most helpful tone in an RfA (especially considering the fact that, ultimately, it doesn't matter; with 49 supports and 1 oppose, there's no risk of that one !vote bringing the RfA down.

5474:

The converting "background" to "background-color" is unnecessary; the former is just shorthand for the latter, and there shouldn't be any difference in the display. Converting the word color into an actual HTML value, on the other hand, was a good call. :)

4455:

qualities of the role. My mistake in not endorsing you to be honest - you've done great work. I can only hope you will continue to act in the way you have done, as opposed to the liars and self interest POV pushers who also have the bureaucrat right.

5599: 1421:

that user added it. I'd definitely suggest that you only edit the userpages of people who specifically asked you to, rather than waiting for them to object - some people don't watch their own userpages and may not notice your edit for some time. ~

1416:

I really don't think EVula's being unreasonable here - peoples userpages are usually edited by the user themselves, and when you add meaningful information to anothers userpage that they may not agree with, then everyone who visits that page will

5080:

I noticed that Roux reverted your edits too. I'm really concerned about what went on, and I think he might be over-reacting. As a 'crat, what is your general opinion? I'd like to get this quality editor back to uh, normal "wikipedia" standards.

3969:), but not even a great deal before that anyway. That coupled with the fact that I was blocked a few months ago for edit warring makes me doubtful that a 3rd RfA would go well -- at least not for a while. Thanks for the support, though :) ≈ 2779:

himself. However, I'd like to point out that you didn't exactly help the situation with the "it's scary that you're an admin" comment; while he shouldn't have called you an asshole, I can definitely understand why he'd be a bit upset.

1535:

My edits were minor changes that were always followed by an explaitory edit summary. This is also an "it is considered" statement, meaning it is not a strict requirement. Any blocks by you on this issue is and will be contested as

5586: 1152:

Mazca is more in the know about my real-life activities than most around Knowledge, as we know each other from elsewhere on the internets. (and, as evidence of this fact, I'd like to point out that he's 100% right) If you look at

694:

Warned for comment, but I don't see any point in move-protecting; not only would he likely just do a fork to bypass the protection (which would be an even bigger headache), he's also stopped moving the page, making it pointless.

2860:

as part of my duties on the account creation team. I didn't notice until after I'd created it that the e-mail address was using the Fullyang.com domain name. Do you still think the UAA request was wrong? I'd like to hear your

3461:

The Overwiki really doesn't have the adminship that it needs right now, I'm too busy with real life stuff to spend as much time as I'd like right now, and Coming Second has only made 5 edits this month. Anyway, a user named

5985:

Nagging is most appropriate, because my life hit a giant busy shitstorm not long after I said "I'll respond in a little bit" (but on the plus side, it's pretty much subsided now). Very much my fault, and many apologies. :)

3673:

Someone, perhaps not you, and requested to usurp the Penulis account on the English Knowledge (see ]). If this ''is'' you, just say it's you here and we can perform the usurpation without a problem. Thanks! ] <span:

1711:, en-2, so if you leave him a message on ptwiki, he should understand that. Since I need to pack up boxes here at work (first I'm moving at home, then at work; what fun I'm having), can you follow up with Rei, xeno? 1130:

I'm assuming he simply means he's going to be busy working on a few shows (ie theatre productions, or similar) once he's done moving, and then he'll be back. I wouldn't worry about losing our beloved EVula yet. ~

739:

I'm in the process of creating a unified login (under the name BlackCat, Tjalling was made on this project because BlackCat already existed), but two (zero-edit) currently registered account prevent me doing so:

1020:

From what I've heard, Monica and Micah were both pretty much written out because nobody liked them. These are the same anonymous people that disliked Hiro being stuck in Japan, which I enjoyed immensely, so...

3336: 1904:, or possibly look for existing ones for the bands by going to the article, clicking the "What links here" link in the toolbox, and selecting just the User namespace; using that technique allowed me to find {{ 6121:

I'm able to maintain my relative faith in (and dedication to) Knowledge's goals by spreading myself out across several different projects. Staking out a new corner of the WMF to make one's self at home in is

1110:

So you're saying you won't be doing much editing from now on? Does that mean an occasional edit or is this tantamount to retirement? Also what do you mean by "two shows?" Give me some explanation as you are

6423:

Spoilsport. I was just getting the popcorn. (Remember, and make allowances for the fact, that most editors on this side of the Atlantic have at this point been drinking solidly for at least four hours.) –

3848:

Er, no. I didn't think it was warranted; numerically speaking, it closed at 66% (since I didn't consider the smoking !vote), which isn't all that close to the traditional "discretionary range" of 70-75%.

1235:

states: "t is considered polite to avoid substantially editing another's user page without their permission." You're editing peoples' userpages when they don't need editing; I also reverted your edits to

960:

know the identity of the character; it is either Tracy or Barbara. Niki is dead, so there are only two possibilities. You removing it because you feel that there are Niki clones out there is speculation.

4835:

Please restrict your editing to just NitrogenTSRH as a show of good faith; I'm not sure why you wouldn't be able to edit your own talk page, as it wasn't set in the block and the page isn't protected...

500:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

2346:

Look, I'm sorry. You're right. I shouldn't have done the guessing game. But please. You must understand that I wasn't trying to be harmful. Please help me. I promise that I'll leave you alone. --

3466:

requested adminship some months ago (you discussed it with him but nothing happened) and still wants the job. He appears to be competent and I could use the help, so what do you say? --MattyDienhoff

6378:

Would you mind reviewing the article? I believe the subject matter to be neutral - we need a third party opinion, and I respect yours. If it's not neutral, I'd appreciate assistance making it so.

4352:

Hi EVula, did you know it's been just over since months since you passed your RfB? Just wanted to note that little fact, and to say that I'm glad I nominated you: you've been great. :) Best wishes.

2816:

Bureaucrats can't do anything about this; we can promote users that have passed an RfA, but outside of that, we're just regular editors. The first step is to contact the offending editor directly.

4915:

and would like some clarification regarding what some of the rights given to Administrators actually entail. Namely, could you provide me with more information about the nature and uses of the

4965:

You are far more thorough than I am; half those I don't really know. :) editinterface just means that you can edit the MediaWiki namespace (which is where various interface files are, such as

3360: 3275: 3170: 1894:

Right now, I don't have time; as per the wikibreak note at the top of the page, I don't even have an internet connection at home (and won't until Monday). You can make your own userboxes with

3372: 3287: 3182: 28: 3365: 3282: 3258: 3175: 5598: 5020:

playing with some of them ..... particularly given the April 1st issues of this year when certain admins changed various Mediawiki interfaces and notice for the lulz ..... :) BTW API =

3348: 3236: 6271:

him as far as edits go; he does seem to potentially have more, but they might be smaller. How can I verify this guy is at least nominally who he claims to be? His accounts seem to be

3231: 3150: 1079: 3353: 3263: 3158: 3733:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3646:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1555:"I actually keep my user page plain by choice" is akin to my statement to you of "thanks but not thanks". I'm not saying that the barnstar wasn't appreciated, I'm saying that the 1190:, who I talk to often off-wiki and I'd cleared the message placing with prior), which you didn't. Like I said, thanks for the effort, but you really don't need to worry about it. 649:

I don't see anything that warrants additional action; it looks like the whole thing has cooled off, though I don't think calling the move "vandalism" helped the situation much...

3251: 3729:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3642:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2888:

realizing that it may not have been the best idea is very different from patrolling the new user list and happening to toss a .com at the end of the name and realizing it's a

6440:

My apologies. Next time I'll try to let it go a bit longer... perhaps I'm just pissy because I haven't gotten to drink yet. Damn parties don't start for another few hours...

3243: 1324:

What fun. He hasn't done anything in a while, unless you've got some evidence, there's not much that can be done. Oh well, looks like he's started being productive anyway...

4075:

appreciate your past contributions, I think you'd be best off by not editing; this is hardly the highest level of conflict you'd come into contact with as an administrator.

1161:, you'll see that I do lots of shows over the course of a year, and each one is marked by a semi-wikibreak. The only thing that's unusual this time is that I'm moving first. 3270: 3163: 2995:

Hmm, obviously spot-on about the logo, but the base image itself... it's got (apparently) valid metadata, the appropriate amount of noise that I would expect, and it's a

3402: 5699:

Sure thing. I'll give it a look in a bit; I don't have much Knowledge time at the moment, and only happened to swing by because of something I noticed on Wikiquote. :)

2802:

Mainly because you're a 'crat. And it is quite scary when an admin endorses adding unreferenced material. But then again, that's why Knowledge is a joke. Nevermind.

1186:

even if I retired). Fact is, you just plain shouldn't modify other people's userspaces unless you know all the details (a good example would be my wikibreak notice for

566:" back and forth between nonsense titles. I couldn't undo any of these. Since you're an administrator, can you restore this article back to normal and move-protect it? 3341: 2274:

Eh, I'm not convinced that it's a big enough issue that it needs to be protected; some rather helpful edits have come from non-admins on the page. Good catch, though.

793:

does have English instructions, and is equivalent to our usurping page; looks like it'll be fairly pain-free (and you can use that same diff as evidence there, too).

6395:

You'd probably be better off asking someone else; COI violations are hardly my speciality. I took a very brief look, though, and I don't see much cause for concern.

4746:

There is no specific "when" involved. When you have more experience with interpreting and following-thru with Knowledge's policies and guidelines, you'll be ready.

4215:

have "many different accounts" and "have made over 20000+ contributions", please share those account names so the boast can be corroborated; otherwise, let it go.

5445: 4040: 3056: 2429: 372: 5839:

since the time that I'm active on Knowledge is very, very wonky (doubly compounded by the fact that sometimes I'm active on a wiki, but not on en.wp itself).

3722:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

3635:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1961:

Considering this is two days old, I'm assuming it's no longer an actionable item (either because they've been blocked already or they've moved to a new IP).

3718:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3631:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2692:

How does that thread have anything to do with the number of songs released? I'm not trying to be snippy, I'm just seriously confused about the relevance...

5607: 3817: 736:

I randomly selected you as the 'crat to (possibly) assist me in this matter. (And because I knew your name; since I nicked your header, but that aside..)

629:

Sorry for interrupting you again. Apparently Wakamusha continues his page move rampage. I've alerted another sysop, but is there anything you can do ATM?

6022:

Not a bad way to go, though with Christmas coming around, I've hopefully got a bit more spare time. Yay for not having to do any work until the 29th! :)

3077: 2649:

Well, there is a third option: do nothing. :) (which would be perfectly valid, since the only edit he made after being warned was to remove the warning)

1363: 6100:

was quite a nice display of faith in the project. Good to know some of the "users who have edited too much" are still... not completely disheartened :)

5519:

I've had to dig around a lot to figure out what everything is with the new Wikia layout. Not entirely sure what the code would most likely be found in

3966: 380: 5635:

Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message!

5292:

AIV would have been just fine; the only reason I saw the Wikiproject posting was because I looked thru your contribs after I saw the ample warning.

3730: 3643: 1231:

I'm not yelling at you; I'm escalating the level of intensity for the communication, given the fact that you didn't "get it" with my first message.

2714:

That's my bad. I misunderstood your question as being related to changes regarding the Genre/Decade of a given song. Sorry for the confusion. --

3928:

and holiday spirt. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and raise the holiday spirit! Send

5821:

Hi! As a bureaucrat on Knowledge, I'd very much appreciate it if you would fill in your details on the newly updated Bureaucrats page. Thanks!

3738: 3651: 3432: 2364:

I find that FisherQueen's statement that you've only made a single positive contribution to Knowledge to be pretty convincing. Leave me alone.

1572:

page to inform people of your edits, that's good enough for me. Thank you for the pseudo-lesson on administrative abuse, unwarranted as it is.

755:

I saw that you are a 'crat on the English Knowledge, so, here I am: Could you either rename (or delete?) the account on the English Knowledge?

790: 5172:

an admin, but you seem to have forgotten to do so. Well, I could really use the help, and he's definitely qualified. Thanks! --MattyDienhoff

4699:

an admin, but you seem to have forgotten to do so. Well, I could really use the help, and he's definitely qualified. Thanks! --MattyDienhoff

4211:

Nobody has said you aren't experienced enough to edit Knowledge, only that you don't have enough edits for an RfA to pass (and if you really

3398: 3394: 2302:

What have I done to you? Please help me. I've sorta been wrongly blocked. By the way, I use library computers. I don't have my own. --

96: 3770:, and I would like to change it back to this. The username redirects to my userpage, proof of changing username from Mohsin to Tangomaan: 5681: 6110: 5414: 5371:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 5191: 4718: 4253:

And, a seventeen year old probably does not have the knowledge of PHP that I do. Go to my website, www.datapile.org, then criticize me.

4016: 3485: 3406: 3032: 2396: 2347: 2303: 1990: 339: 780:

Anyway, before I do the rename, can you verify that you're the same person as BlackCat? All you have to do is put an interwiki link on

3319: 3214: 3132: 2195: 5021: 2264: 1905: 1653:

It really seems like more a malfunctioning bot than an iw project, I can drop the person a msesage but I don't speak Portuguese... –

4268:

PHP is hardly a college-level skillset; I had ample website development ability when I was in high school, though I didn't attend

4269: 1989:

Remember me? Well, I got blocked unfairly! Can you help me out? See my real talk page. I promise I'll be more good edity. --

684: 639: 597: 576: 5520: 784:

to your Tjalling userpage and I'll consider that evidence enough and will perform the rename. I'll even update the interwiki. :)

6201: 5274: 4966: 2868: 1540:. In the future I will give more talk page suggestions than actual edits and any edits I make will be noted on the talk page.-- 556: 856: 1010:

As long as you're indulging in OR speculation on this talk page, why was Monica Dawson cut from season 3? Does anyone know?

4071:

Judging by your reaction, I'm guessing a collaborative work environment isn't the best fit for you. I'm sorry, and while I

6068: 5395: 5351: 4996: 3832: 1528: 301: 283: 265: 247: 229: 211: 193: 175: 161: 4395:. I need to do some rogue promoting. Pardon me while I go do a username search for anyone with "on wheels" at the end... 2939:

Partly, but it was more a general nip-in-the-bud for that entire thread; though I'm fairly certain Stifle meant that the

2892:. It appeared as if the latter was what happened, which is why it caused so much concern for everyone (myself included). 1559:

wasn't (which his statement corroborates). As for the "followed by an explaitory edit summary" bit, as I explained, it's

1514: 891:

Thank you for your help! (and the linkchange; I'll keep it there for now, for the Polish guys). I wish you all the best!

5380: 3389: 2678: 2260: 918:

then you need to do so for the other villains in the vision. For all we know, they could be shapeshifters or illusions.

305: 297: 293: 287: 279: 275: 261: 257: 251: 243: 239: 233: 225: 221: 215: 207: 203: 197: 189: 185: 179: 171: 167: 157: 153: 3762: 3594: 3540: 2636: 3088: 1766: 1604:

especially to templates, as it doesn't seem to be properly adding them to the non-included documentation... Thanks! –

5677:

By the looks of your contrib history, it seems our prime editing times neatly fail to overlap at all. <grins: -->

4864:

Was slowly adding the WS-author template, and you have been and done. My skates must need a service. <laugh: -->

4020: 1178:

do anything); if I'm going to retire, I'm more than capable of informing everyone myself, and my amusing mention on

6303: 5200:

Arg, yeah, that's on my list of wiki things that I've dropped the ball on. I'll try to make it over there tonight.

4642: 3884: 3723: 3636: 2680:

is the discussion regarding which reference to ultimately yield to in the event of discrepancies between games. --

2077: 2400: 5411: 4013: 3836: 3029: 2889: 2514:“Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recommendations. Ivanova is god.” 2393: 2183: 1414:"In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing another's user page without their permission." 336: 6468: 6131:

You can see how many sysop flags I've got to get a pretty good idea of how many times I've almost burnt out. ;)

315: 3710:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3706: 3623:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3036: 1852: 1537: 1460:

I have given you ample warning. If you continue to make major unsolicited edits to users' personal pages, you

3619: 2132: 1994: 1474:

watchlist, it's easy for something to slip thru). I think that is a fair compromise between our two stances.

6106: 5187: 5130: 5000: 4912: 4904: 4714: 3481: 2351: 2307: 1453:"they don't need you to be their little watch-fairy". It's obvious that not everyone appreciates your work; 1313: 343: 4825: 4421:

Man, time flies... seems like only yesterday that I was bracing for the third time 'round the track. Many,

2597:

Don't take it personally; just by the law of averages, not all of your fans can be sexy beasts like me. ;)

1366:

that say someone can't or shouldn't edit someone else's userpage. If a user has any objections to my edits

5418: 4870: 4362:

Yeah, if EVula goes much longer without doing something really stupid then people are going to think he's

4338: 4300: 4258: 4244: 4178: 4147: 4104: 4061: 3970: 3933: 3578: 3524: 2973: 1884: 1506: 5367:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

6385: 6299: 5863: 5815: 5277:? Or is there a better place (such as the regular vandalism reporting board)? Thanks for the help! -- 5270: 5183: 5005: 4953: 4710: 4679: 4646: 4138:

I'm sorry, and while I do appreciate your past contributions, I think you'd be best off by not editing"

3477: 2776: 2073: 6296: 3965:

Hmm, I'm not too sure, personally. I'm not even that active anymore (the past few weeks less so due to

3873: 1549: 1402: 6381: 1216:

your acess to admin tools does not grant you any special status or duty beyond the use of the tools.--

6082: 5179: 4706: 4516: 4512: 3473: 2983: 2529: 2504: 2454: 1912: 1011: 844: 758:

And, if you -by any chance- know any Polish 'crats, could ask them to do the same with that project?

680: 635: 593: 572: 563: 415: 6518: 6192:

May your holidays be filled with family, friends, and fun, and may the new year bring you much joy.

5911:

I think you should probably wipe those edits from the history too before you go to bed. Good night!

3075:

hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into

2803: 2761: 6255: 6206: 5922: 5880: 5746: 5045: 3778: 2865: 2849: 2807: 2765: 1779: 1743: 1663: 1614: 1232: 1179: 1112: 4731:

Thankyou for letting me know, I was expecting it, But could you advise me on when to apply again?

3982:

Bugger. I didn't even bother checking your block log... I think you've made a good call there. :)

125: 88: 6101: 5779: 5743: 5657: 5465: 5364: 5319: 5282: 5126: 4603: 3412: 1308: 896: 852: 831: 768: 749: 497: 321: 60: 6220:

As with many designs on Knowledge, this one was of course, inspired by the wonderfully talented

5889:

Yeah, I thought the rollback would catch it all. D'oh. And just as I was heading to bed, too...

5835:

Done, though I'll admit that I'm retarded when it comes to figuring out my relationship to UTC,

6259: 1708: 820: 526: 6329: 6013: 5976: 5689: 5393: 5349: 5273:

was the first person I've reported for link spamming. Was I correct in posting my request to

4866: 4736: 4538: 4334: 4296: 4254: 4240: 4174: 4143: 4100: 4057: 3947: 3917: 3828: 3685: 2358: 2039: 1951: 1880: 1545: 1498: 1454: 1398: 1297: 1221: 1154: 1120: 78: 38: 781: 6500: 6450: 6405: 6350: 6141: 6032: 5996: 5944: 5899: 5869:

Hello, I think I must have been edit conflicting with you in trying to fix that. Thank you.

5849: 5797: 5763: 5709: 5629: 5533: 5485: 5461: 5302: 5252: 5210: 5150: 5107: 5058: 4979: 4890: 4846: 4821: 4801: 4775: 4756: 4666: 4623: 4596: 4556: 4488: 4435: 4405: 4320: 4282: 4225: 4085: 3992: 3859: 3798: 3715: 3628: 3561: 3505: 3443: 3010: 2954: 2927: 2902: 2826: 2790: 2735: 2702: 2659: 2607: 2553: 2479: 2374: 2328: 2284: 2237: 2210: 2096: 2060: 2015: 1971: 1928: 1898: 1801: 1721: 1685: 1641: 1582: 1484: 1334: 1283: 1251: 1200: 1092: 1043: 993: 983:

know which character it is, and I'm not comfortable with us definitively stating who it is.

966: 944: 923: 879: 803: 705: 659: 617: 542: 450: 317: 66: 54: 43: 6337: 6057: 4959: 3902: 2355: 840:

Oh and btw; good luck with your relocation! It must be a huge step. I hope all goes well.

6496: 6446: 6425: 6401: 6346: 6137: 6028: 5992: 5940: 5895: 5845: 5793: 5759: 5705: 5529: 5481: 5376: 5298: 5248: 5206: 5146: 5103: 5054: 5032: 4975: 4886: 4842: 4797: 4752: 4662: 4619: 4552: 4534: 4484: 4465: 4431: 4401: 4316: 4278: 4221: 4081: 3988: 3855: 3794: 3746: 3659: 3557: 3501: 3006: 2977: 2950: 2898: 2822: 2786: 2731: 2698: 2655: 2634: 2603: 2582: 2549: 2522: 2497: 2475: 2466: 2447: 2370: 2324: 2280: 2233: 2217: 2092: 2056: 2011: 1967: 1924: 1858: 1825:

Hey, EVula, help me out. I need some userboxes for the following. Think you can help? :

1797: 1717: 1681: 1637: 1578: 1480: 1353: 1330: 1304: 1279: 1196: 1183: 1088: 1039: 989: 940: 875: 799: 701: 675: 655: 630: 613: 588: 567: 538: 506: 446: 431: 409: 395: 146: 107: 49: 17: 4511:

Metacritic, Rotten Tomato's etc... can be there, I am more than certain TMDb can be too.

3438:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 5448:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 4043:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 3059:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 2432:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 375:. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list. 342:, an interview with Florence Devouard, has been released. You can listen and comment at 6523: 6251: 6229: 6222: 6194: 5917: 5912: 5875: 5870: 5625: 5566: 5550: 5509: 5228: 5083: 5044:

In addition to Pedro's excellently sound advice, you might be able to find the page at

4353: 4196: 4165: 4126: 3925: 3774: 3719: 3632: 3416: 2862: 2857: 2775:

I'm not sure why you're coming to me about it; if you want an apology, take it up with

1771: 1735: 1704: 1655: 1606: 72: 2122: 426:

I'd like to say that was a fucking excellent decision, and bollocks to the naysayers.

6482: 5776: 5740: 5647: 5426: 5315: 5278: 4578: 4028: 3044: 2853: 2492: 2408: 1864: 1386: 1375: 1237: 1068: 892: 848: 827: 764: 743: 514: 480: 440:

My master plan of executing a Controversial Promotion™ has failed. Damn damn damn...

351: 4695:

Hey EVula, sorry, but I have to nag. :P You said you'd stop in and see about making

1703:

Okay, I've gone thru all the template edits from 2008 and made the necessary fixes.

6526: 6507: 6457: 6434: 6412: 6389: 6357: 6321: 6317: 6307: 6289: 6285: 6214: 6148: 6115: 6039: 6017: 6009: 6003: 5980: 5972: 5951: 5925: 5906: 5883: 5856: 5829: 5823: 5804: 5782: 5770: 5716: 5693: 5685: 5662: 5570: 5554: 5540: 5513: 5492: 5468: 5438: 5400: 5388: 5357: 5344: 5323: 5309: 5286: 5259: 5232: 5217: 5173: 5157: 5134: 5114: 5090: 5065: 5039: 5011: 5003:

so that I can stick some blue links in there and at least attempt to demystify it?

4986: 4897: 4874: 4853: 4829: 4808: 4780: 4763: 4740: 4732: 4700: 4682: 4673: 4649: 4630: 4563: 4520: 4495: 4472: 4442: 4412: 4382: 4356: 4342: 4327: 4304: 4289: 4262: 4248: 4232: 4205:

You say you're 17, then say you're in charge of a corporation with 500+ employees?

4198: 4182: 4167: 4151: 4128: 4108: 4092: 4065: 4033: 3999: 3977: 3954: 3942: 3912: 3890: 3866: 3842: 3821: 3805: 3782: 3750: 3711: 3689: 3681: 3663: 3624: 3599: 3568: 3545: 3512: 3467: 3447: 3049: 3017: 2989: 2961: 2933: 2909: 2878: 2833: 2811: 2797: 2769: 2742: 2720: 2709: 2686: 2666: 2643: 2614: 2588: 2578: 2560: 2534: 2509: 2486: 2459: 2422: 2381: 2335: 2311: 2291: 2268: 2244: 2103: 2081: 2067: 2043: 2035: 2022: 1998: 1978: 1955: 1947: 1935: 1888: 1840: 1808: 1786: 1750: 1728: 1692: 1670: 1648: 1621: 1589: 1541: 1491: 1438: 1409: 1394: 1378: 1341: 1318: 1290: 1225: 1217: 1207: 1147: 1124: 1116: 1099: 1072: 1050: 1014: 1000: 970: 951: 927: 900: 886: 860: 835: 810: 772: 712: 689: 666: 644: 624: 602: 581: 549: 457: 435: 421: 402: 365: 319: 6297:

http://de.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Spezial:Benutzer&limit=1&username=JD

5561:

Ok, I had a look into it, but I can't find where to put the pic. Can you help?...

5223:

I there, it's the so-called Klow. What did you decide? Thanks for answering, man!

3700: 3613: 2539:

I've actually said something similar to line 1 to my actors, and even better, had

1600:

Oh great purveyor of interwiki links, if it pleases you, could you perhaps review

5597: 1791:

Looks good. If I have internet this weekend, I'll check up on further bot edits.

1385:; they don't need you to be their little watch-fairy. If someone needs you for a 5641: 4587: 3872:

to a wide enough agreement that the editor is trustworthy enough for adminship.

3439: 3309: 3204: 2872: 2201: 2157: 2145: 1830: 1187: 962: 919: 473: 6163: 6491: 6441: 6396: 6341: 6272: 6132: 6023: 5987: 5935: 5890: 5840: 5788: 5754: 5700: 5524: 5476: 5293: 5243: 5201: 5141: 5098: 5049: 5026: 4970: 4881: 4837: 4792: 4747: 4657: 4614: 4547: 4530: 4479: 4459: 4426: 4396: 4367: 4311: 4273: 4216: 4076: 3983: 3850: 3789: 3742: 3655: 3552: 3496: 3122: 3001: 2945: 2893: 2817: 2781: 2726: 2693: 2650: 2628: 2598: 2544: 2470: 2365: 2319: 2275: 2228: 2087: 2051: 2006: 1962: 1919: 1792: 1712: 1676: 1632: 1573: 1475: 1423: 1325: 1274: 1191: 1132: 1083: 1034: 984: 935: 870: 794: 696: 650: 608: 533: 441: 427: 389: 117:

This archive contains comments posted between October 2008 and December 2008.

34: 3342:

GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license

5562: 5546: 5505: 5368: 5360: 5224: 4388: 4189: 4158: 4119: 2716: 2682: 2259:. You may want to protect :-) See Acalamari's talk page too. Best wishes, – 1873: 1846: 4786:

I'm not a fan of the "place a ton of warnings" system. I prefer to place a

2318:

You've wasted enough of my time with your little "guessing game". Go away.

1563:

easy to overlook something like that on a watchlist; that isn't sufficient.

6312:

Looks like I'll go ahead and give it to him, then. Thanks for the assist.

6008:

No problem. I'll just keep tossing a pebble a week until you reply. :) --

2976:? It's on Commons, but I highly doubt it's free, or made by the uploader. 2227:, I'll be able to figure out how to use that userbox. Call it a hunch. ;) 5640:

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by

1064: 106:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, head over to

5632:

for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

3773:

if you could please do this now. then it would be really great. Thanks!

6313: 6281: 6276: 5169: 4696: 3463: 1393:

they have a need to contact you. P.S.: You work in play productions? --

6373: 5585: 5337: 1303:

Just happened across the 'game' he was having with you. I think it's

5644:

which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it.

4584:

after your renames. I fixed one for you but there seem to be others.

4209:

you have multiple degrees? Forgive me if I find that hard to believe.

3164:

Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content

1374:

my edits to their or their bot's userpage, like the second button on

493: 5775:

I think I started most of those VFD, so I recognized the names. :-)

3523:

Thanks for the note. I added a comment, if that's any help. Cheers,

3271:

Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page

6246: 4774:

Shouldnt vandal i.p.s only be blocked after a final warning given?

4641:

Hey EVula, how's it going? Any progress on getting a photo for the

2520:“No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.” --- 6517: 6467: 6326:...I love it when I don't have to do anything. :) Thanks, Martijn. 6245: 5787:

Unsurprising, which is why your RfA is doing as well as it is. ;)

3431:

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

1457:

was as similarly pleased as I was about your edit to his userpage.

1174:(in fact, the entire crux of my message to you was to tell you to 5682:

Knowledge:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Review_of_declined_CHU_request

4024: 3040: 2884:

That is a very different situation; registering the username and

2404: 2072:

I still tremble to think there might be a day where I get outed.

1946:

it has comitted 5 vandalistic edits to various sports schedules--

826:

I'll be posting my request on that Polish section in a minute. -

347: 4526: 4114:

Whoa there. I never said you weren't wanted; I said you weren't

3312: 3207: 3125: 1879:

If such exist, post them on my talk page. I'll do the rest. --

5753:

closing procedure). You're just the first person to notice. ;)

1627:

Damn you, I've got other things to do right now, but it's just

4911:

Now that I have become an administrator, I have had a look at

4295:

So I get marked as starting a personal attack and you do not?

1511: 819:

Thank you for the assistance! (I love the header btw!) I just

322: 119: 5422: 3354:

News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones

671:

Not even a move-protect? His civility isn't that good either

6056: 5595: 5336: 3901: 3332: 3227: 3145: 3087: 2760:

possibly re-examining the user's administrative privileges.

2121: 1370:

at my talk page and state their objections. Some users have

472: 6522:

To a good 2008 and to an even better 2009. Happy New Year!

3379: 3294: 3189: 3107: 3083: 1381:. A standard user or IP can make a posting on my talk page 789:

There's nothing I can do about the Polish section, though.

778:

What a handsome looking header you have on your userpage...

2152:

enjoy being the Star of the day, dear EVula/Oct-Dec 2008!

674:. Something that sends the message straight is all I ask. 5971:

holidays. Merry Christmas/Happy New Year, by the way. --

4447:

Six momths eh. And in that time you've become one of the

3573:

I do what I can. This way your maniacal laughter will be

2543:

people say something similar to that when describing me.

6340:

will automagically translate to the localized version.

6097: 6075: 5737: 5734: 5731: 5728: 5457: 5164:

This needs addressing - New admin on the Half-Life wiki

4610: 3771: 2924:

directed at me? If so could you explain what you mean?

2921: 2756: 2595: 2575: 2442: 2256: 2150:

For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,

1601: 1458: 1412:

would appear to be a guideline that says exactly that.

1258: 1245: 1158: 1057: 1028:

it!" kind of characters. I'd love for them to actually

672: 5622:; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. 5421: