104:
argument and war editing with the editor Qed237. It is clear that I have leant from my mistake and urge you to give me the chance to contribute to the community. I deem I was unfairly treated by the administrator GiantSnowman because he had agenda on me all along and all his decisions were favoured to the editor Qed237 as it is clear they have known each other. All along I was involved in an argument with Qed237 I do think it is unfair for the administrator to block me while Qed237 is free to walk. The argument was started from this regarding timestamp (
108:) Please note that no consensus was reached in the end. On a few occasions, Qed237 posted provocative messages on my talk page such as the following. I am not denying I had scolded Qed247 in the past but that was partly down to his winding up on my talk page. Indefinate is not forever. Knowledge:Standard offer is to wait six months, and then make an unblock request. Qed237 (talk) 11:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
18:
129:), it indicated "...this does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." Now that the administrator GiantSnowman reverted everything I have done, even
103:
Since I am unable to file requests for arbitration nor edit in any page may I ask you how long will I get banned as there is not a timeline here, please. I am a devoted editor and is willing to amend my mistake. I have already been banned for more than 10 days after being involved with an on-going
120:
from 2012 - 2017. 6+ 9 + 7 + 4 + 4 = 30 league goals. This edit can be deemed as controversial but the statistics are different depends on sources but I took them off from the official site of
Everton. Another poster had amended and gave explanation on that issue since. This has proved my edits
137:) GriantSnowman changed all the the pages back to the old version without judging or checking my edits are genuine and up-to-dated. Kindly consider my reasons of mitigation. Thank you.
197:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
163:
before making another unblock request. You spend a lot of time talking about other people's actions, here, and that's completely irrelevant to your block.
121:
contributed to the community. Further, Qed237 broke the three-revert rule on a number of occasions but he or she received no punishment (on 13 May 2017).
58:
182:
53:
159:
You are blocked because you have engaged in block evasion, yet this unblock request does not address that. Please read
30:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
31:
25:
112:@Anna Frodesiak and GiantSnowman: IS this a sock? Has happened before. Qed237 (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
105:
72:
114:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Efc1878&diff=780235791&oldid=780234135
110:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Efc1878&diff=780671263&oldid=780671075
191:
168:
134:
117:
160:
138:
106:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_108#Timestamps
36:
126:
164:
116:
Ungrounded accusation but the administrator believed in Qed237. My reference:
123:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kevin_Mirallas&action=history
172:
146:
127:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Evasion_of_blocks
16:
133:
May I ask your goodself is this core value of wikipedia? (
179:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
199:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
135:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Thedixies
122:
113:
109:
86:
82:
76:
67:
63:
49:
45:
41:
118:
http://www.evertonfc.com/players/k/km/kevin-mirallas
24:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
8:
7:
14:
131:the edits are uncontroversial.
125:In accordance to your policy (
1:
28:, who declined the request.
215:
183:guide to appealing blocks
173:13:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
147:12:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
142:
21:
73:change block settings
20:
22:
206:
196:
190:
92:
90:
79:
61:
59:deleted contribs
19:
214:
213:
209:
208:
207:
205:
204:
203:
202:
194:
188:
187:, then use the
176:
150:
80:
70:
56:
39:
32:blocking policy
17:
12:
11:
5:
212:
210:
177:
157:
153:Decline reason
101:
97:Request reason
94:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
211:
201:
200:
193:
186:
184:
175:
174:
170:
166:
162:
156:
154:
149:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
111:
107:
100:
98:
93:
88:
84:
78:
74:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
50:global blocks
47:
46:active blocks
43:
38:
33:
29:
27:
26:administrator
198:
180:
178:
158:
152:
151:
130:
102:
96:
95:
68:creation log
35:
23:
64:filter log
181:read the
83:checkuser
42:block log
54:contribs
192:unblock
139:Efc1878
77:unblock
37:Efc1878
161:WP:GAB
185:first
165:Yamla
169:talk
143:talk
87:log
34:).
195:}}
189:{{
171:)
155::
145:)
99::
81:•
75:•
71:•
66:•
62:•
57:•
52:•
48:•
44:•
167:(
141:(
91:)
89:)
85:(
40:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.