32:
Headers: I am happy with the structure of the article. However in the section
Content has too many. Please remove the headers and make it a bullet list. Also: less capitals please: "Historical Context" does not need to have a capital C, etc. Usually we only make the first character of a header
21:
Hello FrankyASF, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to
Knowledge standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on
42:
References: Please use inline references: references you add behind the dot of a sentence. For every paragraph you need to add at least one inline reference. Also every 2 or 3 sentences need a reference. This should also result in that you have more sources
29:
Links: You made a good start, but a few more keywords need to be linked. Think for example about "English", "Physician" (without capital), please go through your article for it.
46:
Ready to publish: No. References are besides good writing the most important part of
Knowledge articles. Without inline references, an article is not ready to be published.
72:
Links: a little bit too much linked now: it is only necessary to link a certain keyword only once in your article.
81:
How was the book received: If possible please add references to other publication than the book itself.
50:
I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our coming meeting. Thanks!
93:
55:
39:
How was the book received: If you can find more info on how it was received it is welcome.
89:
51:
78:
Context/timeframe: Are there really no other sources to be found for this section?
22:
Knowledge. I standard look for a series of subjects that may need improvement.
36:
Context/timeframe: I think this section can be longer, and with sources added.
97:
59:
84:References: besides mentioned ^^ it is sufficient.
8:
33:capitalised, unless it is a given name.
7:
14:
1:
113:
60:08:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
98:08:33, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
17:Feedback on your article
69:Intro sentence: good
65:Today a new review:
26:Intro sentence: good
104:
112:
111:
107:
106:
105:
103:
102:
101:
19:
12:
11:
5:
110:
108:
86:
85:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
64:
48:
47:
44:
40:
37:
34:
30:
27:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
109:
100:
99:
95:
91:
83:
80:
77:
75:Headers: good
74:
71:
68:
67:
66:
62:
61:
57:
53:
45:
41:
38:
35:
31:
28:
25:
24:
23:
16:
87:
63:
49:
20:
88:Thanks!
90:Romaine
52:Romaine
43:added.
94:talk
56:talk
96:)
58:)
92:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.