141:
26:
41:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
167:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
171:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
164:
153:
86:
38:
105:
34:
61:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
101:
157:
68:
30:
94:
90:
123:
148:
132:
29:
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
85:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
100:
For information on how to contribute to
Knowledge when you have conflict of interest, please see
117:
111:
177:
104:. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see
78:
173:
77:
to the
Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
181:
125:
25:
71:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
146:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
152:
is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge according to
165:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/New Media Partners
102:our frequently asked questions for organizations
8:
7:
154:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
106:our conflict of interest guidelines
14:
163:The article will be discussed at
139:
24:
37:. In keeping with Knowledge's
1:
91:verifiability of information
126:09:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
197:
182:09:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
156:or whether it should be
31:New Media Partners (nmp)
48:exercise great caution
87:neutral point of view
39:neutral point of view
69:deletion discussions
35:conflict of interest
149:New Media Partners
133:New Media Partners
33:, you may have a
188:
143:
142:
122:
120:
114:
28:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:
187:
186:
185:
144:
140:
137:
118:
112:
109:
95:autobiographies
22:
12:
11:
5:
194:
192:
138:
136:
131:Nomination of
129:
108:. Thank you.
83:
82:
79:Knowledge:Spam
72:
62:
21:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
193:
184:
183:
179:
175:
169:
166:
161:
159:
155:
151:
150:
134:
130:
128:
127:
124:
121:
116:
115:
107:
103:
98:
96:
92:
88:
80:
76:
73:
70:
66:
65:participating
63:
60:
56:
53:
52:
51:
49:
45:
40:
36:
32:
27:
19:
17:
170:
162:
147:
145:
135:for deletion
110:
99:
84:
74:
64:
58:
54:
47:
43:
23:
20:October 2009
15:
59:creating
158:deleted
75:linking
55:editing
174:Sadads
119:george
113:Teapot
93:, and
50:when:
44:avoid
178:talk
67:in
57:or
46:or
180:)
160:.
97:.
89:,
81:).
176:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
