User talk:Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa

3948:

extremely well supported; you may or may not have found a refutation of the the claim, but a refutation (even if it were certain) is not a reason to *remove* the claims that it refutes - indeed, it is ridiculous to add a refutation and then to remove its raison d'etre, so it then has nothing left to refute in the article. No, you are going seriously wrong here: I only hope it was a slip of the keyboard, as it were. If it was intentional, then it was either a serious misunderstanding of how Knowledge (XXG) articles work, in which case please stop, or it was a conflicted action, which is forbidden. I do hope I am making myself clear.

111: 4448:

account in this Knowledge (XXG) article? Why is such an amateur report (An Olive Branch) given credence while a professional investigation (Thompson) is not? Her qualifications: "Barbara W. Thompson, J.D., L.P.I., is a former attorney and a current licensed private investigator in Pennsylvania who has managed a private investigations practice for 25 years. She was a first and second vice-president, secretary, and treasurer of the Pennsylvania Association of

69: 2833: 1364: 151: 79: 89: 100: 190: 176: 4108: 3472: 3262: 3839: 3421: 904: 4991: 4171: 3749: 3526: 3321: 3119: 2592: 1269: 161: 4258: 2495: 2398: 2301: 2167: 2070: 1973: 1876: 1779: 3666: 1653: 121: 1396: 3199:

knowledge available regarding our Sikh history. In one of the information board (picture attached) it is written that the Son of Guru Gobind Singh Ji, Ajit Singh Ji attained martyrdom. Now every of our Guru was a fighter. Guru Gobind Singh Ji also knew about his date upon which he will become immortal. It is believed that Guruji after the same event prepared his own Angeetha (pyre) (

4032: 986: 442: 200: 843:. Please don't get discouraged with Knowledge (XXG) I think you have a great deal to offer, and writings is Knowledge (XXG) rank a lot higher in the search engines than other places. However, search engines keep track of clicks, and as more and more people read your writings where every you put them, I am sure you writing skill will be recognized where ever you put it. 4741: 2687: 141: 2926: 4549:

report, the An Olive Branch Report. They got past you. That is the problem with being disinterested (or "neutral" as you like to call it). Being disinterested, you likely do not care enough about a subject to deeply study and understand it. Without knowledge, you (collectively again) are liable to let really flawed material get posted that never should be.

3489:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3281:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1575: 1176: 4042:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge (XXG) can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 244: 3207:

everyone who obeys Guru Granth Sahib Ji will always see his/her Guru Ji in his bodily avatar always (As it is said Pragat Gurua'n di Deh). But someone who leaves physical form of human body can never come back in such form unless the person who leaves the physical form of human body proclaims something to still consist of his/her physical form.

4579:

Nobody did. As stated in the Thompson report, the makers of the Olive Branch report committed a number of legal errors that could make them liable for prosecution. One is that they were in no way qualified to conduct an investigation. Another is that they conducted their sham exercise out side the boundaries of their state of Pennsylvania.

18: 494: 575: 4656:

I will and I'm sympathetic but you must understand that on wikipedia we regularly encounter "true believers" who try to enforce their own version of "truth" on the site. We're pretty jaded when it comes to handling this sort of thing which is why we're so insistent on going by what WP:RS say not what

4578:

What makes allegations credible is 1) that those making them make themselves known. Allegations cannot be anonymous. 2) their testimony is sworn. That is, they swear that it is the truth. 3) The accusers are subjected to cross-examination. The Olive Garden fiasco honored none of these criteria.

4327:

Wow! Did you know that I wrote most of the article myself and added the photos and signature? Probably not. I wrote it because I know the material and you do not. I wrote the man's biography. And now you want to defend some profoundly flawed content that has wormed its way into the article? God

3391:

It is obvious that you are here on a promotional agenda, spamming your bits and pieces all over Knowledge (XXG) and promoting a certain group and treating Knowledge (XXG) like your personal blog. If this continues then you will be blocked, while you could've been blocked already as the disruption has

476:

Thanks. I am following the discussion with interest. Will contribute or possibly edit the article as time allows. I thought the footnotes were extensive and authoritative enough. It happens Sikhs don't control the major media outlets in India or elsewhere so their story - the afflictions visited

422:

Do I have a personal interest here? Kind of, but really I just want the truth to be represented. There is no personal stake in this, any more than you have a stake other than your admirable dedication to the truth. Am I objective? Who is objective? I have seen the redwood forest and now I write

418:

I have done the best I can and will revisit from time to time, but for the moment, I have done the best I can. There is a lot of 3rd party referencing there now that wasn't there before. Then again, I happen to a) teach the teachings of Yogi Bhajan, having studied his teachings for some 36 years.

4923:

As I said, the An Olive Branch Report is not a reliable source. The Thompson Report is. That is the source of our difference. But perhaps you would need to read The Thompson Report to know that. I realize this is hard. You are a volunteer. I am not being paid either. Somehow, it is nice when

4447:

Why not focus on the An Olive Branch Report? Barbara Thompson discussed that report and found it to be both flawed and illegal. The following are her qualifications. She is a unquestionably a very reliable and professional source. Why is her critique of the An Olive Branch Report not taken into

4127:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge (XXG). For legal reasons, Knowledge (XXG) cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted.

3929:

If you feel able to go beyond that, then you must take extreme care to be neutral, and to cite the most reliable sources. Your mention of the Thompson Report was, for the record, totally uncited, so I've removed it. The sources cited in that sentence are certainly reliable, numerous, and recent; so

3198:

I belong to a Sikh family. I have been disturbed at the way pages showing the history of Guru's. It has been referring to a "death" date which according to me is incorrect. I recently visited Nanded and there is a museum that is dedicated to the Sikh History. In these museums there is a plethora of

382:

In 1969, Yogi Bhajan established the 3HO (Healthy, Happy, Holy Organization) Foundation to further his missionary work. It served his premise that every human possessed the birthright to be healthy, happy and holy. It was only a matter of unlearning one set of habits and replacing it with a kinder,

4635:

Since you say it that way, I have to respond that what constitutes an "attack" depends on a person's perspective. From the perspective of Guru Amrit Singh Khalsa who commissioned the report, the legacy of his teacher was under attack. He wanted the report to set the record straight. If you have

4500:

On their own a journalist is generally not a reliable source, its only when they're producing work for a reliable publication that their work is considered to be reliable for our purposes. Note that the sources don't base their reporting on the Olive Branch report alone, they appear to report that

4418:

Please. This is a report about a report about a minor religious figure whose only biography is self-published by a student of his. You think the New York Times or the ACLU or a professor at a major university or some other neutral third party would discuss such a report? Why would they? Nobody

4385:

The "An Olive Branch Report" (AOBR) is directly cited as #25, and indirectly in citations 4, 5, 6, 24, 26, 27, 28, & 29 which are article citing it as evidence. The entire section "Alleged sexual abuse" is based on it and Pam Dyson's book. When AOBR came out, Barbara W. Thompson, J.D., L.P.I

4312:

I did assume good faith, you were first warned about this behavior in 2008 and have been warned over a dozen times since. I assume that you are capable of comprehending those warnings. That means that you are aware that your edits were vandalism. You knew what the right path was, you knew what the

854:

Well he mostly wrote it, others edited as well. He is also being attacked for not having a neutral point of view. His article was also put up for deletion. I am right now going to read the deletion discussion but I really get the feeling that the only reason it did not get deleted is because he

370:

Yogi Bhajan, The Teachings of Yogi Bhajan, Pomona, California, 1977, quotation #1: "When the little me has recognized the big me and the little i has recognized the big I, oneness is achieved. And when one knows that one is the one and one knows everything is one, then what is there it find? It is

4548:

That is the problem. You (speaking generally of Knowledge (XXG) and its army of well-intentioned staffers) are very good at catching people who have personal interests in a subject. But you (collectively) allowed numerous citations (9 exactly) in this article based on a flawed and even illegal

4515:

They appear to report lots without substantiating evidence or testimony. I think you are just going to oppose what I say no matter what. I get that millions of women in America alone are abused every year. Perhaps you are one. My heart goes out to everybody who has been hurt. But having dug

1746:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

1447:

3947:

I am shocked that you have deleted the claim to which you seem to object, while doing other (undoubtedly) good work. It looks very much as if you are succumbing to Conflict of Interest. I would urge you not to edit the article for a cooling-off period. I have restored the claim, again, as it is

4356:

What I am telling you is that without my interest in the subject, this article would hardly exist. COI regulations are fine in principle, but in practice they do not always get the job done. Because of my proximity to the subject matter, I know The Olive Branch Report cited in the article is

3206:

My submission to you is that we must not use the term of death for our Guru's as they are all alive in the form of Guru Granth Sahib Ji as it is said "Sab sikhan ko hukum hai Guru Manyo Granth, Guru Granth Ji manyo Pragat Gura'n di Deh, Jo Prabh ko milbo chahe, khoj shabad main le." So I guess

4904:

be deleted along with the reliable sources associated with that content, and replaced with your preferred content. For balance, all POVs should be represented. You need to use the article talk pages to discuss controvertial changes. I understand that you are busy, as are 90% of all of us WP

4676:

Dear Horse Eye's Back - You might be surprised if you got to know me. I have one of the most critical mindsets you could ever imagine. That is why I dialogued with you in a respectful and rational way. I get where you are coming from. I just think a good man is being trashed and I don't

4563:

You keep saying illegal, what would be illegal about the report? Again the articles don't appear to be based on the Olive Branch Report, they appear to draw from a wide variety of source material. Again we are talking about credible allegations by dozens of women. The Olive Branch Report

3333:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4853:

to place requests for proposed changes on the talk pages of articles with which you have a COI. An unconnected editor(s) will then analyze the proposed changes and either make them or not. Again, please STOP directly editing articles with which you have a conflict of interest. Thank

3538:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4870:

Thank you, Netherzone. I may not have time for this. Yes, I am connected with the subject of the article. I concerns me that a flawed and illegal report on the allegations against Yogi Bhajan should be cited in an article like this. That's all. If you have time, you can check:

4451:

Licensed Investigators (PALI), and served as an executive board member for eighteen years. While on the board of PALI she co-chaired a team of board members who worked on the revision of the Pennsylvania Private Detective Act of 1953. She has actively worked to raise the quality

922:. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at 3973:

Could you please take extreme care to log in before editing this article. Knowledge (XXG) takes a very dim view of people who repeatedly, whether intentionally or not, do not log into their accounts when editing controversial articles, especially when making large deletions.

2714:). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: 3863:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4942:, as that is the correct location to discuss content issues in relation to the article. It also allows other editors who have watch-listed the article a chance to see the discussion and weigh-in with their thoughts. The article talk page is located here: 255:

policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should

3930:

if you wish to note that the claim made there has been refuted, you must base it on a more recent, unimpeachable and unquestionably neutral source, which you must cite in full, preferably supported by a full quotation of its conclusions. All the best,

3131:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4848:

You have been warned about conflict of interest editing twice in the past, please consider this your third warning. Due to your COI, you should not be editing this article nor related articles directly. Instead, please use the editing request system

933:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

3447:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

371:

only when we think that I am and everything else is everything else that we have to find something." p. 105; quotation #2: "Live as royal saints. Nobody shall walk over you, but nobody who needs you shall be deprived of your strength." p. 104.

1428:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 538: 517: 3925:

You should therefore be aware that it is critically important on articles in which you may feel some attachment, such as this one, to be scrupulously neutral and if need be to confine your editing to edit requests on the talk page.

3025:

You've been warned about this before. You are not allowed to write about yourself on WP. This not only applies to writing autobiographical articles, but also to what you just did when you created a section about yourself in another

4295:- I doesn't say much, but I did see it said "Assume good faith". Can you do that and walk back a bit and see that the edits I did were in good faith, and that the citations I removed were flawed. For a detailed analysis, see: 3860: 1693:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 2564:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2467:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2370:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2236:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2139:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2042:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 1945:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 1848:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2557:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

2460:

2363:

2229:

2132:

2035:

1938:

1841:

5036: 4214: 3792: 3566: 3361: 3159: 3867:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

3451:

3074:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 344:

Sorry, I've been away - holiday and other more pressing stuff. I'm happy to work with you on this article, but unexplained blanking of critical discussion by an editor with a major conflict of interest - like

1129:. There is no reason to create an entirely new article called "physio-kundalini syndrome" when it's clear it's just an alternative name for kundalini syndrome. I will now have to put this article up for AfD. 419:

My students cite me as a reliable authority on this subject matter; b) be the guy he asked to write his biography and for that reason I am possibly better versed on his life than anyone else you will find.

4661:

using a very narrow definition of verifiable. Are you sure that none of the reporting has talked about the Thompson report? Even just mentioning that it exists and disagrees with the Olive Branch report?

768:

Those people are making some weird argument about copy right violations right now that is so technical that even I don't understand it. To be honest it sounds to me like they are making a legal threat

5020:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4198:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3776:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3550:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3345:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3143:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2519:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 2422:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 2325:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 2191:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 2094:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 1997:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 1900:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 1803:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge (XXG). If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 2945:. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have a conflict of interest, see the 4839:'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See 3444: 714: 456: 396:

Primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of the article are generally not sufficient for a Knowledge (XXG) article. Please include more appropriate citations from reliable sources

855:

know how to use the Sikh project group to get people to come in and vote for his side. I don't know this for a fact, and this is entirely speculation on my part. I am investigating further.

1125:

If you want to do substantial work on an article, you create a sandbox page in your own user space, you do not create an entirely new article on essentially the same topic. That is known as

5005: 4184: 3762: 618:

that covered the subject of your article. While this may not be possible for some subjects (your cat, your garage band), you'd be surprised how easy it is, and people are happy to help on

2732:

Hello Mr/Ms Eekster. My name is Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa. That is my real name. I am not Gurucharan Singh Khalsa. Therefore the article I contributed is not an autobiography. Thanks.

4472:

None of that would make her a subject matter expert. Those are not qualifications we recognize. For our purposes Thompson's opinion is only relevant if its featured in reliable sources.

3996:

I am sorry to see that an edit-war has broken out in the article. Given that discussions have been under way for some time now, that is not acceptable. There is a clear policy on this (

2930: 1188: 689: 684: 1041: 1000: 3232:

My hope now lies in you. Please find the attached picture it is taken from a museum in Nanded. I assume people who are enforcing their riights have never been to Nanded as well.

2905:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

2872:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

412:

Thanks. Welcome back. I appreciate your critical outlook. The material I erased was slanderous and offensive - and hardly objective, if objectivity is what we are looking for.

636:

information can be copied without permission — this does not include most web pages or images. You can rewrite the article so that it is no longer a copyright violation, you can

882:

Thanks again. I found the site you mention to be interesting and well-informed. By the way, how does one use a project group to get people to come in and vote for one's side?

4357:

unprofessional and illegal. Because of your distance from the subject matter, you have no idea - and you are going to leave it as a major citation? May The Force Be With Us!

4657:

we ourselves believe. I know that this might seem foreign to a man of great faith who seeks the truth but we settle for something less than absolute truth and that is what is

779:

One more thing, Wikipeida rules are so convoluted that some people think that who ever knows the rules best wins, but it is not true. One of the five pillars of wikipedia is

415:

It is difficult to cite exact word-for-word quotes of someone who has lectured as profusely as Yogi Bhajan. There is not easy source or way of searching for these quotes.

1715:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

2846: 1377: 4066:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 1064:

Please see my comments and reason for deletion. I think inclusion of this section warrants discussion, so as to avoid possible edit wars. Also note referencing. Thanks --

711:

Next they deleted arguments from the deletion discussion itself. Have a look at the edit history they took out TeamQuaternion's last comment after they blocked him?

459:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 4530:

I don't have an opinion either way. Our own opinions aren't supposed to skew our editing, if one can't edit a topic area dispassionately they can't edit it at all.

4136:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy 3718:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

2330: 2309: 4063: 358:

One of Yogi Bhajan's significant impacts on popular culture has been his use of the word "great." In the 1960s and 70s, before the proliferation of the ubiquitous

4371:

What major citation? Its used once and then for its own contents. Do you have a reliable source which says that the Olive Branch Report is incorrect or illegal?

4749: 2934: 41: 4433:

If no reliable third party has discussed the report then neither should the wikipedia page. That is how we enforce a neutral point of view here on wikipedia.

3893:

Well I'm surprised anyone took a pop at this article; she's certainly one of the world's best-known yoga gurus, and she got a whole chapter in Janice Gates's

4677:

especially like it. In answer to your question, I have not seen any trace of a mention of the Thompson Report in any of the reporting cited in the article.

4144: 4120: 3850: 3433: 2762: 2551: 2454: 2357: 2223: 2126: 2029: 1932: 1835: 1724: 1543: 1498: 839:

Looks to me like Sikh wiki is written from a Sikh point of view, and that is not a bad thing. Hope you are still studying the Knowledge (XXG) principle of

637: 362:

and "Have a nice day!" Yogi Bhajan never settled for "nice." He counseled greatness. He encouraged greatness. He expected greatness in his students, no less

4516:

deeply into this matter and interviewed many people, I do not believe that Yogi Bhajan has done any of the outrageous things he has been accused of doing.

1197:

is a fundemental precept of Knowledge (XXG). As I stated before, if you want to make changes, please provide a rational, without attacks such as "hot air".

809:

All you have to do is click on the link below and add your name to the list, then you will have 40 new friends who think pretty much like you to help you!

4124: 2900: 2867: 1720: 641: 391:

supports the quote about birthright, but says nothing at all about "unlearning one set of habits and replacing it with a kinder, more uplifting routine".

3691:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 4671: 4630: 4602: 4573: 4539: 4510: 4481: 4442: 4413: 4380: 4351: 4322: 2706:. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for 215: 4840: 3501: 3293: 2655: 1642: 1385: 1332: 656:. Generally, you must show how the previous deletion(s) were in error, but this is the place to resolve disputes about whether a deletion was wrong. 144: 133: 1488: 3392:

been going on for far too long, you haven't been given a final warning (although you've been alerted to the conflict of interest policies etc.) —

2839: 2832: 1025:

Please make your self familiar with the wikipedia policies to overcome any challenges .... good work... good contribution to wikipedia... thanks

4419:

discusses the report except those who know about it, and they are few and far between. Besides, you would not consider them reliable sources.

2715: 508: 4089: 2711: 2569: 2565: 2512: 2472: 2468: 2415: 2375: 2371: 2318: 2264: 2241: 2237: 2184: 2144: 2140: 2087: 2047: 2043: 2021: 1990: 1950: 1946: 1893: 1853: 1849: 1827: 1796: 1484: 610:, it was deleted because you didn't give us enough information to confirm that people had published articles, books, or other publications to 2758: 1539: 1494: 2892: 2215: 5059: 4237: 3814: 3580: 3375: 3173: 3099: 3635:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s 2349: 1728: 836:

Looked at your new user page! Followed the link, really glad to see that your writings are online some place! The really deserve to be.

103: 4285: 2002: 1981: 1808: 1787: 3687:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

1529: 871: 4486:

You consider the journalists that uncritically accepted and cited the An Olive Branch report in their articles to be reliable sources?

2751:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2196: 2175: 598: 3006:

of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

4893: 4889: 4824: 4342:

Did you know that because of your COI you weren't supposed to do that? Because you've been warned about it repeatedly so you should.

3010: 2659: 1452:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 1336: 430: 302: 252: 154: 49: 4804: 4762: 4001: 2942: 1433: 1179:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you

652:

If you've repaired the article, or you believe the reasons for deleting the article were in error, you can dispute the deletion at

322: 248: 203: 193: 919: 2118: 247:

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Knowledge (XXG), you may have a

4078: 812: 804: 520:

will be happy to give you a copy of your deleted article, either by putting it on a special user page for you (a process called

5055: 4233: 3810: 3576: 3371: 3169: 3095: 224:

on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Knowledge (XXG)!

214:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Knowledge (XXG). If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use

5029: 4207: 3785: 3559: 3354: 3152: 2896: 2863: 1662: 1491:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1405: 72: 4621:

When you wake up can you tell me more about fairinvestigation.com? It appears to be an attack page not a reliable publisher.

2770: 2755:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2550:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

2453:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

2356:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

2222:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

2125:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

2028:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

1931:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

1834:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

1536:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1149:

Can you please restore the lede to this article? Before you started editing it there was an introduction in the right style:

915: 897: 4767: 3485:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 3277:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2952: 2647: 2603: 2446: 2099: 2078: 1324: 1280: 1258: 756: 1924: 4046:, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like 352:

Can I remind you that references require that the cited statement(s) actually source what the article says? For instance:

4073: 3490: 3282: 2651: 2508: 2411: 2314: 2180: 2083: 1986: 1889: 1792: 1748: 1449: 1328: 183: 4961: 4925: 4875: 4678: 4643: 4608: 4580: 4550: 4517: 4487: 4459: 4420: 4391: 4358: 4329: 4299: 3453: 2733: 2282: 883: 818: 375:

It's fine to quote that second paragraph. But not to paraphase it into something completely dissimilar like the first.

275:

articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;

4263: 4139: 3854: 3437: 3273: 3086:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2859: 2427: 2406: 2281:

Sorry. Was being flip. The truth is that I spent some considerable time researching and finding these unique photos.

2267:

until you review the policy and understand it. Reasons such as "Frankly this was easiest" are not even close to valid.

1708: 996: 653: 452: 282: 124: 5041: 4667: 4626: 4598: 4569: 4535: 4506: 4477: 4438: 4409: 4376: 4347: 4318: 4281: 4219: 3797: 3571: 3366: 3164: 3091: 1905: 1884: 1311: 1247: 4039: 4025: 3481: 3200: 2752: 1669: 1412: 3639:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

2962:

articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;

1040:

I believe your article has extremely good historical information. Go and vote (keep/delete etc) for your article at

632:", or copyright violation, an administrator removed it because it violated someone's copyright on their work. Only 423:

about it. Can anyone who has seen the redwoods remain objective? I leave that with you to decide. Thanks again.

4872: 4456: 4387: 1528:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1475:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

467: 3018: 3014: 2695: 2634: 1150: 611: 310: 306: 3730: 1184: 455:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 403: 330: 4686: 4651: 4616: 4588: 4525: 4495: 4467: 4428: 4399: 4366: 4337: 4307: 3997: 521: 318: 114: 26: 3681: 3659: 3600: 3592: 3428: 3412: 2543: 1238: 1049: 1030: 943: 448: 434: 5017: 4846:

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

4760:(COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 4195: 3773: 3547: 3342: 3140: 179: 2691: 2599: 681:

This appears to be the location were they do much of their plotting, wonder if you were aware of this group.

4009: 3979: 3953: 3935: 3922:

Hi, I see you were given a fair warning of possible conflict of interest on similar articles back in 2008.

3902: 3879: 3399: 1599:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

867: 790: 724: 4116: 3719: 3628: 2718:, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 1686: 859: 4777:

articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;

4663: 4622: 4594: 4565: 4531: 4502: 4473: 4434: 4405: 4372: 4343: 4314: 4277: 4112: 3967: 3916: 3845: 3829: 3603:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 1743: 1678: 1646: 1348: 1276: 1262: 701: 4269: 3688: 3087: 2663: 1732: 1340: 992: 978: 953: 923: 698:, basically they got all their little cronies to come into the deletion discussion, and rigged the vote. 169: 165: 4791: 2972: 1444: 1421: 1389: 463: 2933:

your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things

317:

For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have conflict of interest, please see

82: 110: 4951: 4914: 4860: 4836: 4757: 4745: 3726: 1723:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 1632: 1588: 1160: 762: 744: 477:

on them are less than well known. In writing the article, I had hoped to shed some light on them. (

399: 326: 4999: 4178: 3756: 3534: 3329: 3127: 3109: 3063: 3054: 2703: 2616:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1613:

the Eugene company's top six executives must return more than $ 30 million"] in ''The Register-Guard

1084: 738: 92: 37: 4455:

professional private investigators and private investigations throughout her career." Her report:

4313:

wrong path was and you chose the wrong path and now you're facing the consequences of that choice.

3214: 2524: 2503: 1764: 1370: 1363: 1134: 1115: 1045: 1026: 999:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 939: 911: 705: 5013: 4888:

Hello, Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa, Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia and one of our three principal

4191: 3769: 3722:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 3677: 3543: 3338: 3136: 3083: 3067: 3045: 3009:

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to

2707: 770: 750:

To be honest I think the answer is yes. These two articles have wildly differing points of view.

695: 4005: 3975: 3949: 3931: 3898: 3873: 3393: 3031: 2723: 2671: 2577: 2554:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 2480: 2457:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 2383: 2360:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 2272: 2249: 2226:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 2152: 2129:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 2055: 2032:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 1958: 1935:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 1861: 1838:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 1233: 1222: 1107: 863: 786: 720: 593:

If the reason doesn't make sense, try clicking any links on the reason, or you can ask by typing

587: 578: 229: 1747:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1690: 1448:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1218: 1126: 68: 4748:

your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things

3215:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Summary_of_dispute_by_Arjayay

642:

donate your work to the project or release it under a license compatible with Knowledge (XXG)'s

4386:

was hired to assess its merit. Here is a link to her report, known as "The Thompson Report":

4152: 3238: 2910: 2877: 2817: 2630: 1559: 1514: 1344: 1307: 1199: 1151:

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/search/?title=Kundalini_syndrome&oldid=369042368

1065: 927: 5025: 4814: 4203: 3781: 3555: 3350: 3148: 3079: 3071: 2984: 1453: 840: 292: 5048: 4943: 4226: 4049: 3804: 1044:. You must defend your article if you believe it is a good improvement of this great pedia. 5028:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5021: 4206:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4199: 4043: 3784:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3777: 3673: 3636: 3558:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3551: 3353:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3346: 3151:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3144: 3082:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3075: 3002: 2947: 2617: 1682: 1429: 1425: 1294: 1194: 1180: 974: 780: 774: 623: 150: 78: 5063: 4969: 4955: 4947: 4933: 4918: 4910: 4883: 4864: 4856: 4784: 4558: 4241: 4156: 4096: 4013: 3983: 3957: 3939: 3906: 3885: 3818: 3734: 3652: 3584: 3513: 3509: 3461: 3405: 3379: 3305: 3301: 3177: 3103: 3048: 2998: 2914: 2881: 2821: 2741: 2727: 2675: 2581: 2484: 2387: 2290: 2276: 2253: 2156: 2059: 1962: 1865: 1768: 1636: 1628: 1624: 1579: 1563: 1518: 1465: 1352: 1252: 1207: 1164: 1156: 1138: 1119: 1096: 1092: 1073: 1053: 1034: 1015: 1011: 968: 947: 935: 891: 875: 826: 794: 728: 671: 471: 407: 334: 232: 88: 4850: 3614: 3608: 3604: 3486: 3278: 2552:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2455:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2358:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2224:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2127:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

2030:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1933:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1836:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

1106:

What the heck are you doing creating a second article on this topic when we already have

633: 629: 619: 615: 4938:

Hello! I've move the message you left on my user talk page to the article talk page of

4640: 4637: 4296: 4093: 4085: 1752: 1476: 1461: 1293:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1130: 1111: 849: 667: 321:. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see 189: 175: 4658: 3672:

Hello, Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa. It has been over six months since you last edited the

3624: 3620: 2983:

to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see

1681:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1424:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

903: 607: 291:

to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see

99: 4057: 3647: 2808:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2800: 2792: 2784: 2719: 2667: 2573: 2476: 2379: 2268: 2245: 2148: 2051: 1954: 1857: 1705:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 1550:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1533: 1505:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

964: 225: 4905:

volunteers, however you do need to comply with policy and guidelines in relation to

3310:

Not sure what you mean. The image is free and authorized. Why are you doing this?

4148: 2938: 2906: 2873: 2813: 2809: 1555: 1551: 1510: 1506: 160: 4990: 4170: 3748: 3525: 3320: 3201:

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Death_of_Guru_Gobind_Singh#Setting_His_Own_Pyre

3118: 2690:

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at

846:

There is another really good writer that maybe you should be aware of, who wrote:

590:, once you enter the name of your page, this will show you who deleted it and why. 558:

Once you have the article, you can try to resolve the issues why it was deleted.

31: 4898:

all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic

753:

Then have a look at this article that was created by combining the two articles.

4939: 4900:

are included. Therefore controvertial content that you do not agree with should

4873:

https://fairinvestigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Thompson-Report.pdf

4753: 4457:

https://fairinvestigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Thompson-Report.pdf

4388:

https://fairinvestigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Thompson-Report.pdf

4273: 640:

to republish their work, or if and only if you are the copyright holder you can

542: 120: 4257: 2494: 2397: 2300: 2166: 2069: 1972: 1875: 1778: 1623:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

985: 441: 4292: 4092:. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- 3861:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gurmukh (yoga teacher) (2nd nomination)

3505: 3297: 2710:, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see 1088: 1007: 199: 3221:(My attempts to edit pages were undone and finally I was blocked as well) 3- 2640:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1317:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

4031: 3218: 1457: 663: 3237: 140: 2887:

File:The Source Restaurant, Los Angeles circa 1970.jpg listed for deletion

2546:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2515:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 2449:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2418:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 2352:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2321:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 2218:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2187:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 2121:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 2090:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 2024:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 1993:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 1927:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 1896:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 1830:, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. 1799:. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have 539:

Knowledge (XXG) administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles

388: 4924:

truth and reliable sources prevail on Knowledge (XXG). I pray for that.

3641: 2788: 2780: 1661:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1404:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

960: 5032:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4740: 4210:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4123:

from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read

3788:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3562:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3357:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3155:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2686: 1968:

Replaceable fair use File:Miri Piri Academy students practicing yoga.jpg

1774:

Replaceable fair use File:Miri Piri Academy Boys at Harimandir Sahib.jpg

708:, to prevent him from further participation in the deletion discussion. 243: 5009:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4188:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3766:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3070:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1480: 2162:

Replaceable fair use File:Guru Ganesha Singh Khalsa portrait photo.jpg

1738:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1439:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

4909:

if you wish to participate in this collaborative project. Thank you,

1689:

infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

1592: 918:, and it appears to be very similar to another Knowledge (XXG) page: 719:

Anyway my mother always taught me that cheaters never win in the end.

359: 3226: 2296:

Replaceable fair use File:Ya Ho Wha 13 and Source Family Commune.jpg

690:

Wikipedia_talk:Notice_board_for_India-related_topics#Sikh_Holocausts

17: 2925: 1432:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 1006:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

530:

List of administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles

493: 462:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

378:

And frankly this is the problem with the whole edit. For instance:

4115:

has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added

2796: 2776: 1191:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

574: 4803:

your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see

4564:

substantiates those allegations but it is not those allegations.

1244:

We look forward to learning from your expertise on this subject.

301:

relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to

5045:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4223:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3801:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5035:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

5003:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

4213:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

4069:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

3791:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

3565:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3445:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Shakti Parwha Kaur Khalsa

3360:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3210:

So let us make our Guru's immortal as Guruji Himself said it!

3158:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

715:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Third_Sikh_Holocaust_1984

457:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Third Sikh Holocaust 1984

285:

about articles related to your organization or its competitors;

4182:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

3760:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

3219:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Paramdeeptung#November_2016

2993:

so that you do not violate Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.

614:

the claims your article made. You'll simply need to find some

4128:

You may use external websites or publications as a source of

1691:

http://sovyatnik.editboard.com/t465-guru-ram-das-ashram-in-la

4030: 3664: 3470: 3260: 3222: 2849:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2831: 2590: 2539:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2493: 2442:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2396: 2345:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2299: 2211:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2165: 2114:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

2068: 2017:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

1971: 1920:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

1874: 1823:

with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.

1777: 1719:

verify that externally by one of the processes explained at

1651: 1394: 1380:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1362: 1267: 902: 597:

followed by your question on your talk page. Or you can ask

4501:

dozens of women have claimed abuse at the hands of Bhajan.

2511:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2414:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2317:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2183:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2086:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 2065:

Replaceable fair use File:Miri Piri Academy science lab.jpg

1989:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 1892:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 1795:. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the 1183:

while interacting with other editors, which you did not on

4805:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI

3849:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

3432:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2838:

Hello, Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa. You have new messages at

2507:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 2410:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 2313:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 2179:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 2082:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 1985:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 1888:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 1791:. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of 1369:

Hello, Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa. You have new messages at

832:

Really happy to see that you got your good article online.

3988:

Thanks. I do and I will. 18:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

3255:

Orphaned non-free image File:Krishna Kaur Khalsa 1976.jpg

1042:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1984 ghallooghaaraa

1001:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1984 ghallooghaaraa

56:(four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. 3619:

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (

5016:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

4593:

They appear to have been more qualified than Thompson.

4194:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3843:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3772:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3693: 3546:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3467:

Orphaned non-free image File:Miri Piri Academy logo.jpg

3426:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3341:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3139:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3027: 2658:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

2560: 2529:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2463: 2432:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2366: 2335:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2232: 2201:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2135: 2104:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 2038: 2007:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 1941: 1910:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 1844: 1813:{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason: --> 1600: 1596: 1584: 1532:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1479:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1335:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1083:

An article you largely wrote is now at deletion review

761:

I would suggest that you paste this article back into

743:

Then ask yourself, if between your article and the the

353: 346: 4813:

to your organization's website in other articles (see

4636:

time, I can share with you some of my own rejoinders:

3692: 2893:

File:The Source Restaurant, Los Angeles circa 1970.jpg

2623:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2535: