User talk:Isonomia - Knowledge (XXG)

637:

lobbyists, I ended up getting banned simply for trying to insist on wikipedia policy by one Billy Connolly who is hardly an unbiased judge. The only good thing that came of that episode was that it forced me to actually look at the evidence I had taken for granted and I can now thank Billy for the realisation that global warming is a theory based on almost no evidence worth speaking of and that there are much better explanations such as sun-spot activity and its affect on ionising radiation and hence to cloud cover. Whilst I was pretty livid at the time that Knowledge (XXG) could allow this vile mobbing by this evil group who edited the page it did at least have a positive effect and I now realise global warming isn't a problem, But even so I wouldn't recommend trying to mention peak oil because it fundamentally drives a coach and horse through the theory of global warming through CO2 - if CO2 is naturally limited by the availablity of oil - and many here would look pretty stupid if the problem was not too much oil to burn but too little! 88.111.89.46 (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

919:. I too started out being concerned about Global Warming, but after researching the science realized there is no scientific proof that increasing CO2 causes increasing global temperatures. You are correct to characterize the Global Warming Zealots as being very much like the narrow minded "born again Christians" and that the pro-GW lobby are "a highly organised, ruthlessly efficient well-oiled publicity machine that was railroading their ideas based on only the flimsiest of evidence." As someone who also studied Physics as my first university degree, I am glad to see that there remain scientists out there who want to check the real science and are willing to stand up to the "GW Denier" witch hunts against top scientists which are currently underway (see: Lindzen, Richard S. (April 12, 2006). "Climate of Fear" 3346:

followed this subject generally, you would know really means the view of a very political group of "scientists" who have used wikipedia like a propaganda machine. Unfortunately, for you, the internet doesn't forget. It's already starting to happen on the climate, and no doubt within a few years I am quite sure there will be numerous instances, in numerous subject, where people are bringing out old articles from Knowledge (XXG) and highlighting the way they were POV in the extreme. I'm absolutely sure one of those areas will be the climate articles. And very soon as the "consensus" on subjects change as real facts (and not opinions of people calling themselves "scientists) come to light, the right wing press will have a field day highlighting the embarrassing way Knowledge (XXG) got it wrong in so many areas.

1954:

home page. So, I've basically no idea what on earth your complaint relates to, it's completely unfounded - in short it is just a personal attack with no foundation. So why are you attacking me? It's you that is not assuming good faith - you will not accept that there may be genuine problems which a well intentioned editor is trying to highlight. Your attack is clearly an assumptuion of bad faith from the very start! Did you even ask: what's the problem? That is what someone assuming good faith would do. No you came in like an attack dog. Why aren't you assuming good faith? Why are you making generalised accusations without any specific evidence? What is your complaint? What do you want me to do about it?

922:). The only way to stop a witch hunt is for good people to stand up and denounce it in ever increasing numbers. To this end you have done your part and deserve to be congratulated. I am particularly proud that you are one of a handful of the "All Seeing Eye" recipients (in fact you were the second Knowledge (XXG) Editor to receive this Award after UBeR.) Please feel free to Award the "All Seeing Eye" to other deserving editors (just post the name on my talk page so that I can keep a list of all the Awardees) "When one man stands up to injustice the spines of all others are stiffened." ~~ 455:

start saying that Global Warming exists. You have to understand that I am strictly anti Global Warming, but right now I would like at least to have information put on the page that shows more than one side. I know that they will respond with "put it on the global warming controversy" line, but after reading that page briefly it's as if they are discussing more what global warming is going to do to the environment. Not if it actually exists. Let me know what you think, and what are the articles that you would like to put in yourself.

293:

with professional lobbyists spending all day everyday changing articles to suit their case and on the other side a few odd-balls who not only don't have the time but don't have the experience to fight these professional lobbyists, it is a completely uneven fight and the result is so obviously biased it is a joke. I'm sorry I can't do more to help, I reached the conclusion there is no point trying to be a neutral editor on the articles because the "gang" just come along and ignoring everyone else change it back to their own POV.

345:. It is now clear that you yourself are guilty of most of the accusations which you have levelled at UBeR above, I believe that you and your co-conspirators should be permanently banned from editing global warming articles in order to stop the kind of bias, frustration and witch hunts which you are causing by your devious tactics. Everyone should know that this group are currently being investigated and exposed by a radio show for their hijacking of global warming articles as this group already knows 1707:

fact which like many other things on the climate (like the current cooling) only wikipedia fails to mention. The evidence for the use of this name is overwhelming, it is rapidly increasing, and why on earth shouldn't I highlight the clear breach of the rules in the attempts by certain editors to yet again hide information that doesn't fit their POV push on the climate? (But I forgot, the rules are only there to protect the "in" crowd of POV pushers - aren't they!!!!)

385:

semi-protection and engage in pagemove vandalism. The hope is that they'll eventually get bored and move on. Or that Tiscali will one day respond to abuse reports. On the one hand, yes, being blocked sucks -- you did log in easily enough, though, and the block was for three days (I'll probably lift it by then). I apologize for the inconvenience; if you or anybody you know is unable to edit because they don't have an account, get in touch with me (whether

542: 299:

know we aren't doing nearly enough to stop it - and all they are doing is making more people sceptical - including me - in fact I ought to thank Mr Connolley because by his actions he has done me a favour - he has convinced me it is a much less important issue than I once thought, a few degrees of warming isn't going to hurt many and it will actually do a lot of good, so what's the point arguing about it! There are much more important issues!

3113: 3227: 680:

edit the article is "never" and unless I am very much mistaken that is not a wiki policy that you can quote to me. In particular, when the temperatures cool, I don't want to have a pathetic fight over which figures to use, or which timescale is appropriate, I want clear guidelines, and if it upsets some of those who have been quoting policy in order to create a POV article I don't have any problem with that.

2963: 1589: 3830: 3793: 657:, you're going to need to convince at least some other editors that your proposals make the article better, more policy-compliant, etc. If a set of arguments have been rejected, then reposting them with a bit of added sarcasm 10 minutes later is unlikely to convince anyone. Also, you have several draft versions of global-warming-related articles in your userspace - these need to be tagged with 1288: 566:

about the eco-fascism you spoke of. I've been doing research on the history of Political Correctness and truly modern environmentalism is completely based on Cultural Marxism. It's a way by which we can be controlled, "For the better good." So in the end you could say that it's not because I'm an anti global warmist. I just worry about what is going to be taken away from us because of it.

3546: 32: 3709: 2832: 1060: 136:

they are being told. Far from convincing people, this type of behaviour does the opposite and taints those sensible people who do agree with the science with the aspect of a "bunch of religious nutters". I'm beginning to wonder whether some of them may not be working for an oil company with the sole purpose of bringing the whole global warming consensus into disrepute.

474:

represent all views, so why go through all the hassle of trying to add material that simply gets deleted? I suggest you just accept it is a pro-warming article and if you want to help make it more pro-warming then whether you are actually pro or anti, you can improve the article by adding more such material, but if you want to add anti-warming bits then don't bother.

549:

symbol of manhood is beginning to look a lot less like a rocket and more like shrunken turkey giblets fit for the dog. But don't go over the top trying to "correct the article", remember Global warming was only the millennium bug on viagra, in the story of man's history I doubt it will receive even a few lines, so it is best not to get too het up about it!

3011: 2367: 533:

obviously allows certain people to propagate published "opinion" as fact, and unfortunately scientists don't spend a lot of time debunking such junk science because in the science community the rule is that science backs the sceptic, and it is up to those who assert something to prove it, and not up to those who are sceptical to prove the negative.

3620: 3587: 107:

arbitrarily by this group trying to chase ANY dissenting contributors out of the GW debate. As an example they will not even allow the simple fact: "However, there remain respected scientists who hold differing opinions." Here is the history of what they did when I tried to keep that tiny mention of other views in the GW article:

753:

that is being ignored. I'm trying to gather the support of other WP users that would like to see more information presented on the page, and also I'm interested in seeing any research that you have been able to dig up. One question, what program did you use to create the graph you posted on the talk page of global warming?

1762:

wikipedia. Knowledge (XXG) is loosing editors in the droves, the standard of articles is getting worse and worse as only a few POV pushers are left - so tell me why I should waste my time trying to edit this wiki - I want to edit something with some intellectual credibility not some PC mantra on the latest enviromental fad!

2666:

I don't know whether that justifies a speedy delete, because this allegation was prevalent early on. I think because I have relatives who deal a lot with FOI I could imagine them being in this position - releasing data which was trying to be hidden, and Knowledge (XXG) is not being fair to them! (if that is what happenned)

2605:. I am sorry, but this is one of the only times I am going to say this, but I am not getting involved in this incident. It has been taken up at ANI. I have too much on my back to deal with this now, and I don't want to say anything because I am not taking sides. Sorry, but this is where I am stepping out. -- 3355:

The stupid thing is that people like me tried to bl**dy well warn you, and all we got is sarky remarks and warning not be "warlike". Well, to be quite frank, I'm glad I didn't invest more time editing Knowledge (XXG) as I think an awful lot of good work is going to be severely tarnished by the stupid

3279:

I've taken the liberty of removing a considerable amount of contentious material from your user page. While Knowledge (XXG) allows a lot of leeway on user pages, much of the material you had put there seems to me to be contrary to the spirit of the general sanctions on the global warming topic. We're

2882:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the

2665:

Off2riorob, I think the discussion needs to take place about having an article on the "hacking incident". Potentially, there is a risk that Knowledge (XXG) is suggesting a criminal intent which would be highly prejudicial if as is suggested the individual were to be an insider who leaked information.

1248:

Cool Hand Luke, I do not suffer fools gladly, particularly when they are not working toward the cardinal requirement of wikipedia: NPOV. But I will assume good faith on your part. To be honest, I'd quite like someone to ban me just at the moment, because I've no intention of helping to edit wikipedia

1155:

Thank you Adambro - must admit I didn't read the article before I posted a version ready for editing. But having read the article I fail to see anything in the original that in any way is a personal attack. Obviously if there is anything I will be more than willing to see it changed. But to be honest

694:

I think you should consider the policy-based arguments put forth on the talk page in response to your proposal, including those from editors who tend to be more "skeptical". The bottom line, as always, is that Knowledge (XXG) will reflect what reliable secondary sources and expert opinion have to say

636:

Why doesn't the article menton peak oil? It doesn't mention peak oil because every single time I inserted a short section on peak oil or even a link it was removed in stark contradiction to Knowledge (XXG) policy. But because this article (at least at that time) was heavily policed by the pro-warming

536:

Whilst this has the benefit of allowing many subjects to be covered that would not otherwise be covered in a traditional encyclopaedia, it does allow those will a political agenda to publish their pseudo-scientific nonsense as "fact", purely on the basis that no decent scientist has taken the time to

532:

Infonation101, there is no such thing as opinion in science. There is science based on evidence and testability, and then there is politics based on opinion. The problem for editors of Knowledge (XXG) is that Knowledge (XXG) doesn't pretend to be scientific, it is almost solely based on opinion. This

454:

Hey, I've been working on the Global Warming page myself trying to get some new research in. The monitors there are making it a pain. I've been digging deep and have found articles that date back to the 70's talking about what they predicted what going to happen, like the fact everyone was going to

365:

Please take a look at this Talk page, especially the part on "pseudoscience" and William's reverts. The POV of certain editors is preventing them from objectively dealing with the facts. The concepts involved are not difficult but they do take a little investment of time to understand. You may need

298:

Paradoxically if you are "anti-" you might do better to let the "pro-" camp get on with it without opposition, because the more POV the article the less likely anyone is to believe it. However, I'm really pissed off with them, because I (used to) think that global warming was an important issue and I

2334:

Isonomia appears to believe that the title of the article is an implicit assertion by Knowledge (XXG) that a crime occurred, in spite of the fact that there is some question about the facts. While I do not support the use of AfD to make that point,nor do I even agree with the point, it to be debated

2266:

I need some help. Whatever the content, there remains in Knowledge (XXG) an article titled: "Climatic_Research_Unit_hacking_incident" I have put a request for deletion based on the fact that in all the time I have been following this event, I have yet to see any evidence of a hacking incident except

961:

After reading the "Wikipropaganda" article, I have come to the belief that it is time to unite the "Order of The All Seeing Eye." The aim would be to unite all editors and Administrators who wish to create a truly NPOV Knowledge (XXG) to more effectively resist and remove POV pushing and censorship

679:

Hi MastCell, thanks for the comments, I very much appreciate them. However I will however continue to press for a clear decision/consensus as to when it will be possible to consider that global warming has stopped. And forgive me if I am cynical because I suspect the real answer of many of those who

548:

Fortunately, we are now getting to the stage where real evidence is becoming a fly in the ointment. Remember global temperature is the phallus of the eco-fascist. They use its huge size and prominent erection to stuff all kinds of rubbish down our throats. Well, now the phallus is broke, their proud

432:

Clearly I can't promise an/some article(s) in Knowledge (XXG) as that will be highly fraught with problems, so to convince people to help, I should say that as our village site is always looking for interesting articles, so no contribution need go to waste. If anyone would like to help work on these

2126:

You appear to be attempting to (ab)use AfD either to force a change in the article's title, for which you know well there is no consensus, or to force the deletion of a well-sourced article because you don't like the content. This is a blatant abuse of AfD - if you have problems with the content or

1934:

I don't care about your statements directed toward scientists, lobbyists and their ilk. My concern is that you have failed to assume good faith with respect to your fellow Wikipedians. Your user page basically insults good faith editors who you happen to disagree with, and that is against Knowledge

1805:

Thank you Hipocrite, having seen all the other "skeptics" go through the same process, I was wondering when it would be my turn. I've no hard feelings, you're just doing your job, and to be honest, the present climate articles are so POV that I'd prefer to leave them as they are ... to be honest in

1282:

This is precisely the kind of thuggish behaviour that turned me off editing wikipedia and this Billy Connolly is always in the thick of it and I have seen so many people disgruntled with his behaviour that it really is unbelievable that he was not struck of years ago for his failure to abide by the

473:

Infonation101, nice to hear from you. May I quote a comment I once saw: "you don't understand the nature of the article, It isn't meant to be unbiased, it is meant to be a propaganda leaflet for the eco-fascists." It isn't worth the fight, anyone reading the article will know that it doesn't fairly

384:

Unfortunately, not all Tiscali customers are as diligent or helpful as yourself -- at least one is a very persistent troll, repeatedly vandalizing, threatening and harassing a few members of the community. They've been at it for quite some time, even registering a few sleeper accounts to circumvent

135:

Rameses - Some people are their own worst enemy. It's very easy to see when an argument is being skewed and contrary views squashed - the public aren't stupid, and this is probably why there is so much skeptism about global warming. All they are achieving is to ensure that people won't believe what

124:

Their actions are equivalent to the burning of books in Germany and other totalitarian states. However we cannot give up, we must continue to fight for a NPOV in Knowledge (XXG). The only alternative would be to give up using Knowledge (XXG) altogether. Good luck and thanks for your hard work - it

3438:

Having followed the climate articles for many years and now having a great deal of expertise, I can no longer just sit back and hope that Knowledge (XXG) will some day come around to a NPOV. There are certain simple things that are so obviously POV pushing that it beggars belief that they still go

3290:

Oh, don't take the Micky. Are you trying to bait me into doing something, if so I've seen your type before and you can guess what I think of you. I've taken the liberty of reverting back to the text which was judged to be acceptable .... now if you are not happy with that please contact the person

1953:

I have assumed good faith. I am assumed good faith for too long so that they have abused wikipedia, and ruined its reputation as a neutral website - I am not attacking any individual, I am making a genuine comment about the failure of the systems in wikipedia and that is perfectly acceptable for a

203:

Rameses, thanks for pointing that out. I'm really saddened by the whole atmosphere around the global warming articles. Far from being the "anti-" lobby as I had originally assumed, in fact the pro- lobby are clearly breaking the spirit of Knowledge (XXG) and attacking every article with which they

2447:

And for clarificiation, AFAIK everyone regularly editing climate change related articles is usually notified by someone. I personally was notified on the 13th January (NZDT). So if you still think the notification in someway reflects negatively on you (which is clearly doesn't and wasn't intended

1706:

I can see which way the wind blows, and I reconginise that many will not like "Climategate", but when I sat down to read the latest news, I quickly realised that every article on the subject was using "climategate" as the name whether the media was pro or anti warming - it is simply a fact now, a

752:

Over the next few months I'll be compiling a lot of information. After going through every possible WP policy, when I return it will be interesting to see what they dispute. I do have to say that this research will not be to "debunk" the global warming theory, but introduce a lot of information

653:. The article talk page isn't a forum for general argumentation, debate, name-calling, etc on the subject of global warming. Especially on a subject like warming, there is a lot of noise and very little signal to begin with. Please don't make that problem worse. Since Knowledge (XXG) functions by 292:

Brittainia, I really do sympathise with you. I have seen perfectly reasonable changes simply wiped by this bunch of thugs. This fiasco has not only altered my whole perception of the risks of global warming, it has altered my perception of the neutrality of Knowledge (XXG). When you have one side

3095:

In short the kind of action you expect from Nazi brown shirts -- no investigation, no justice, no chance to appeal, and basically the only reason I used his homepage is that last time I sent him any comments I started getting huge amounts of spam - which although I can't prove are connected - it

565:

Good data in that last graph, but as so many would say, "It's not a trend. It would have to happen for at least 30 years before it holds any type of scientific validity." My biggest concern is that by converting students to this idea will help big government intrude into our lives. Interesting

418:

I run a local village web site and would like to summarise the global warming issue. Unfortunately, this article is so long and so convoluted that it really isn't much help as a starting point. Would it not be an idea to create 1 or 2 simpler wikipedia articles aimed at explaining to the average

3345:

Tony, thanks for the apology. However, it really doesn't alter the fact that Knowledge (XXG) as a body has been entirely hypocritical in regard to sceptics of global warming. The "neutral point of view" is defined as the "peer reviewed science" - which if you had read the climategate emails and

2493:

To be brutally honest, I don't really know whether we are talking a simple rename, or perhaps several other articles, or what, I'd rather not get involved in some petty politics. What does concern me, however, there is some individual(s) out there who Knowledge (XXG) are wrongly suggesting is a

2938:

Nil Einne, I saved the original to see whether anyone wanted to edit it and to avoid redoing the work if she rapidly became notable. I think sufficient time has passed that I would be content to delete it - to be honest I thought I put in such a request - because even if she is now notable, it

1278:

Now I believe this was as a direct consequence of my recent edit reverting his change on an article whereby he had deprecated well supported facts about soot causing global cooling (its in the article on global dimming) and changed the tone and meaning of the paragraph to suggest (without much

2920:

yet had not been edited for over a year. Do you plan to complete this into an article and move it to mainspace anytime soon? If not, may I suggest you request a speedy deletion as the creator and only substanial editor? Because if you don't and have no intentions of finishing it and moving to

1919:

I have assumed good faith for many years - I'm sick to the back teeth of these fraudlent lobbyists smothering wikipedia with their lies. Thank god it now looks like this whole case is going to get the independent review: in court! Now if you think I'm being polemic, about people who are being

1197:

Don't worry about it Hlohcierekim ... I've just been researching her "career" and except for the fact I know she's not going to give up this chance to become (I'm reading old articles) famous I wouldn't see any point in trying to start the article. It is actually quite amusing to see just how

1761:

Ignignot, can't you understand that if people don't find the article by the name they know has been given to the event, then not only won't they believe the article - which makes all the hot air on the subject a waste of time by both sides - but they won't believe anything else they read in

106:

Mike, I appreciate the work you have done against enormous odds. The way William M. Connolley and his crew of censors work is infuriating. You are absolutely correct that they completely disregard NPOV as we can clearly read above. I have also had a great deal of work and effort destroyed

3457:

I KNOW WHAT IS A NPOV ... BECAUSE I HAVEN'T FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED FROM WHEN I USED TO BE A GLOBAL WARMING ADVOCATE AND NEITHER HAVE MY VIEWS ON THE ENVIRONMENT CHANGED ... I JUST CAN'T STAND PEOPLE BEING DISHONEST, AND I JUST THINK SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT ENVIRONMENTAL

2489:

These may or may not warrant individual or collective articles - that is quite rightly a separate article(s), but whatever the decision there, there is no question that the specific incident being referred to by the title: "Climatic Research Hacking Incident" is not supported by evidence.

1468:

The user requested a block. As far as I can see, the conditions for that request, as far as the user is concerned, are still fulfilled, and so the user must obviously still wish to be blocked. How to reconcile that with the users unblock request I leave to anyone else who is interested

1120:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

2424:

The climate change article probation requires editors to be notified prior to any enforcement action. This isn't an indication that I will be filing an enforcement action, but it does put you on notice that future disruptive conduct is likely to attract an enforcement request. --

1274:

I made some comment that I would rather not edit wikipedia than watch a bunch of people using strong arm tactics to prevent NPOV and the prime candidate who has repeatedly used these strong arm tactics comes to my talk pages and totally misconstrues my comments and blocks me.

3368:

And over the last week, I've seen a dozen obvious mistakes (some in articles I once wrote ... but now realise I got some facts wrong) ... but why the heck should I correct them when Knowledge (XXG) doesn't care about truth and honesty only POV pushing on petty politics on the

2270:

I would like to follow procedure: the article name as listed refers to an event for which there is no evidence it happened. There was no hack, there is no article, and so I see no reason at all why these other editors should abuse procedure and remove this request for delete.

281:

We should write our views of the situation with the proof to show the degree of frustration which Uber and we all are suffering. If we cannot save Uber from this injustice, WMC and company will simply extend this witch hunt to all who do not support their POV. Thanks, --

1686:

in the future. It makes no suggestions to improve the article, but is merely you using the article talk page to engage in chat about some senator saying something. If this behavior continues, I will ask that you be prevented from further disrupting talk pages. Thanks.

3356:

politicking of people like you on the climate (and don't try to pretend that "neutrally" keeping out sceptical views is not a form of politicking and POV pushing because it is). Knowledge (XXG) deserves its declining reputation because it never wanted a NPOV ... and

3194:

First if you are referring to the personal note to William Connolley, this clearly has nothing to do with Knowledge (XXG) nor to the articles here because 1. I do not edit these articles and 2. The last time I heard about William he had quite rightly been banned.

3325:

until a few minutes ago and didn't realise you had been blocked. My edit was not opportunism and you can revert it when the block expires, though as I said I don't think it's good idea to do so and I still recommend that you post it, if anywhere, on your blog.

2479:

Dear MWOAP, thanks for the comments. My request for deletion is for the article named Climatic Research Hacking Incident is on the basis that there is no evidence of a hacking incident and that the University itself is not now talking about a hacking incident.

2988:

Alan - thanks. Unfortunately, I don't edit Knowledge (XXG) much these days (the petty politics of global warming have put me off), and so I've entirely forgotten what the template was for, so I have no problem with it being deleted if no one else is using it.

2696:

I understand the confusion now - Isonomia is asking for the article, not the AfD, to be deleted or blanked. Sorry if that wasn't clear at the outset. MWOAP's warning above relates to the (mistaken) impression that you were proposing to blank the article. --

1491:"so the user must obviously still wish to be blocked" well, no. He is obviously entitled to change his mind. I am taking the unblock request as a clear change of mind and unblocking, even though the unblock request is badly done and is a personal attack. -- 1249:

as long as there are articles like global warming which are so blatantly one-sided and run by a gang of internet thugs who ban anyone who disagrees with them. And that is not a personal attack, it is an attack on the failure of wikipedia to enforce NPOV.

1701:

Seriously, why do you have to start a new section on something that has been talked about multiple times before on this talk page, and then begin it with something that will immediately be called soapboxing? Are you expecting to get somewhere this way?

3842:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

3462:

From the day I first tried to get a NPOV on the climate articles (when I used to work in wind and was openly saying global warming is happening) till today, I haven't once managed to get a substantial change toward NPOV into a climate article.

1447:

I'll talk to the blocking admin about this. If we take his block summary at face value, I would say it's clear you don't want to be blocked now and would lift it. But I suspect this is more a case of an inadvisably flippant block summary.

1136:

Whilst this was speedily deleted by another admin I have since restored it as I don't consider it to be an attack page since it appears to be properly sourced and the development of articles outside of the mainspace is perfectly acceptable.

3612:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

2884: 1255:: a short bronze colored person with green hair possibly desendents of leprecons who knows a lot about the rights and wrong of a candy factory and are taught to spontainiosly break out with a funky fresh beat about those rights and wrongs. 2157:

I have noted the mess up on the AFD page, and ChrisO above has removed the template from the article. Here at Knowledge (XXG) we have a policy of assuming good faith, I am sorry you had to see this. He is partially right though it does

593:

I want to say something like "if we want to make progress, we should be more like wikipedia and kick any WIKI-ZEALOTs out of the discussion", but I'm sure this isn't the proper term and would like to know if there is a better phrase.

1838:

I'm expecting to get banned in the next few months, so I thought I would tidy up my affairs so to speak and remove any odd articles on my user pages. But, it is so long since I last edited that I have forgotten how to do it! Please

2519:

Seriously, I am totally convinced that Knowledge (XXG) is potentially breaking UK trial law and prejudicing a potential trial of an individual (You never know it might be me - JOKE!). I know there are people with strong views, but

3657:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

3280:

supposed to be working in a collegial manner and not accusing one another of skulduggery. Please do place such material on your blog or another website under your control. I just don't think it's a good idea to have it here. --

2774:

Yes, thanks I just about have it now, the messy AFD need blanking and speedy delete, and then insomnia needs to understand that this article is fine and will snow close an AFD if they request it, so can I do the housework now?

3470:

And the great consolation, is that the climate articles have been so POV that most decent people can spot it a mile off and what with climategate, the propaganda in Knowledge (XXG) is no longer considered a reliable source.

3321:. When I investigated that and noticed other warlike behavior I made the changes I've described above, also noticing in doing so that Sandstein had warned you earlier the same day. I didn't notice the enforcement thread at 2524:

it is about removing any suggestion that Knowledge (XXG) supports the view that someone hacked the UEA. Obviously the effect of removing this article on hacking, is that there is likely to one or more other articles, but

1557:

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described

3870: 1810:... admittedly second best to telling the public the truth, and it kind of detrats from my other contributions to see Knowledge (XXG) going downhill so far, but the truth will out even under the worst censorship! 962:

on Knowledge (XXG). The alternative is to let Knowledge (XXG) continue on its current course of becoming discredited as a propaganda tool in the hands of zealous censors. Let me know your thoughts on this? ~~

706:

It is a pity I don't have the time to challenge your assertion that wikipedia doesn't care about scientific fact and only reports political opinion. Unfortunately, I've got some important work, but I'll be back!

3752:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3402: 3465:

I'm angry ... not because I f*cking wanted to put the sceptical view ... it is because you bunch of pr***s have turned me into a sceptic because you refuse to see the obvious POV pushing that has been going

1029:

Thanks, but there is nothing there! But I think events have overtaken my request. Given the publicity a lot of people who know a lot more than me are going to demand they can start editing the articles on

3490:

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

3558:, which you've sourced to Mike Haseler. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 3258:. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at 3854:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 57:

Do you think you could more correctly marks the parts copied from Domestic Annals or rewrite the whole thing. You've just cut and pasted chunks from the book. It reads like it was written in 1850! --

1180:

Sorry about the hasty deletion. Sometimes we delete first and don't ask questions when there's a BLP question. I should have engaged in discussion first. The article looks better now, too. Cheers,

1231:

if it we're irrelevant, but there's no cause to refactor here. If you like, you can remove them altogether, but altering the words creates the incorrect impression that Kim posted what you wrote.

590:

Hi, I'm writing a very concise commentary on wikipedia and praising the way wikipedia insist articles are based on fact rather than personal opinion and I'm looking for a "wiki" way to say this.

2194: 3453:

And don't you dare think I'm pushing POV - I have not once added anything to a climate article without first seeking consensus (which basically means I have never edited a climate article)!!!!

3199:

You'll see that I have not engaged in any discussion with him for ages on Knowledge (XXG). But as I don't edit Knowledge (XXG), what on earth was the point of this ban? It's really juvenile!

597:

What I'm trying to say is that if some will not work toward a consensus then they should be removed rather than allowed to stop others making progress, and I'm using wikipedia as an analogy!

2494:

criminal and I don't think that is acceptable and for people to abuse procedure to prevent a request for deletion is just criminal in the literal sense (isn't prejudicing a trial criminal?)

831: 783: 3086:

I now realise that this person was referring to private message to Connolley which was written as a result of an external website where he invites messages to be placed on his user page.

2062:

You just accidentally posted the same lengthy comment to two different threads over there. I am not sure which thread you meant it to be in, but could you remove the other one please? -

695:

on a subject. When expert opinion holds that global warming has "stopped", Knowledge (XXG) will reflect that, in proportion to the number and weight of experts who express such views.

2379: 2162:

like abuse. I will keep monitoring this page and a few others related. If you want to take the AFD down, please let me know as soon as possible. Let me know if you need anything. --

2132: 275:

made by Raul654 to the administrator noticeboard regarding my actions. I whole heartedly believe my actions are just and warranted. Please review the current situation. Thank you. ~

2306:

ALL THIS JUST SHOWS THE CORRUPTION IN WIKIPEDIA THAT WE CAN'T EVEN DISCUSS DELETING AN ARTICLE WHICH SAYS IT IS ABOUT AN INCIDENT WHICH THERE IS NOT THE SLIGHTEST EVIDENCE HAPPENED.

1722:

If you want to get anything changed on that article you're going to have to work towards consensus, and present your point in a way that doesn't drive the consensus away from you.

3804: 3358:

I've only ever wanted NPOV on climate articles - and I'm sick till vomiting of the disgusting attitude of of the hypocrits who run this show who don't want NPOV but just their POV.

944:. This article from the CBS News website exposes the control over all global warming related articles by William Connolley and other censors including Kim Dabelstein Petersen. ~~ 222:

Here is evidence of more people who are willing to delete articles to stop people reading and deciding for themselves - from User talk:Michaelbusch:=I think you'll enjoy this one=

3909: 114:(cur) (last) 17:05, 21 February 2007 Rameses (Talk | contribs) (←Undid revision 109846090 by BozMo (talk) You cannot censor the simple fact that some scientists hold other views) 1977:

Since I am given to understand that your response to this request is going to be more insults toward Wikipedians (as I read your comment above), I will proceed with the MfD. --

3904: 2267:

the say so of the University. The University in their latest press release have stopped referring to it as a hacking incident, so even this slight evidence is now unsupported.

3259: 3413:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2805:

Done, as you can see as a test page, what we need is more easy discussion and starting with fresh eyes, ultimately we are all wikipedia editors worthy of respect, regards.

2041:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2030: 842:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

794:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2874: 3511: 1900:

on the part of fellow Wikipedians by suggesting they use wikilawyering and blocks to "POV push". If you are unwilling to do this for any reason, I will most likely

315:

The following is from my recent post, please go to the Admin noticeboard and post your views on this now exposed conspiracy by a group of Administrators. It is at:

3506:

in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

2868: 2825: 3570: 2483:

My request for deletion does not cover the various other events in various other institutes which have been put together under an umrella of climate .... gates.

3647: 1962:

You assume good faith and tell me how to write that front page so it gives the same message without lying as to the serious abuse going on in Knowledge (XXG).

3435:

As far as I can see Knowledge (XXG) has become a very turgid shadow of what I originally signed up to - and I really can't see any point editing it any more.

2056: 1425:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

331:

that you made just after UBeR filed a checkuser against William M. Connolley, clearly shows that this entire complaint against UBeR was orchestrated just to

1432:

It was very clear my comments were that I did not wish to edit wikipedia so long as there was not civil behaviour, and I think he just underlines my point.

2846:

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the

2758:

Off2riorob, please see my comment immediately above - it's a misunderstanding. The ref to ANI is to a previous discussion about Isonomia, not yourself. --

2713:

ec, right thanks, :There is nothing at ANI at all and bolding claims that I will be blocked for some small issue is hilarious, where is it at ANI then?

1083: 2195:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive584#User:Isonomia and keeping Talk:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident managable.

3177:, and note also the warning below. (To clarify for the benefit of any reviewing admin, this is a normal block, not an arbitration enforcement block.) 3667: 2821: 1079: 335:. The next step should be to stop this intentional diversionary complaint against UBeR and investigate your activities instead. Your entire group 2581: 2371: 986:

I don't see any useful content in the article history. Your best bet is to go ahead and make a proper article, being sure to cite good sources.

3449:

Pretending "global warming" is a "scientific" issue when everyone knows it is mainly political rhetoric even when practised by the "scientists".

2838:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge (XXG). Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use

3675: 3153: 2736:

sorry my last comments were removed, I still think we need to remove the article, I hope someone else can sort it out .... the bus is leaving

1410: 2370:

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,

1328: 721:

You're describing is a strawman argument which I did not advance. Although it is pleasing to be accused of both excess scientism (elsewhere)

341:, orchestrating these illicit activities should be thoroughly investigated by all those who have wasted a lot of their valuable time on your 3800: 3716: 3697: 2970: 2095: 1596: 1577: 3884: 3777: 3298: 3206: 2001: 1740: 419:

Scottish reader (without a degree in climate science) of a small village like ours, the essential arguments pro and anti global warming?

3594:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 3069:

Sorry, I can't deal with any requests like this. It sounds like you need to contact an admin, if you don't know how try the help link.

623: 120:(cur) (last) 16:48, 21 February 2007 Brittainia (Talk | contribs) (NPOV - still worth mentioning there are scientists with other views) 46:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 1858: 3515:

involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by

3231: 854: 806: 229:

Pretty bad. Someone should have caught it before it passed the speedy deletion deadline. Michaelbusch 04:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

3494:

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (

2527:

I TAKE THE ARTICLE AS IT IS NAMED AND HAVE REQUESTED THAT SUCH AN ARTICLE BY THAT NAME IS REMOVED BECAUSE IT IS POTENTIALLY ILLEGAL

2406:

ChrisO, am I being paranoiac or are you undertaking some kind of campaign against me? What exactly are you referring to this time?

1156:

I'm getting a very strong fealing that some people do not like this girl and intend to do whatever they can to prevent an article.

3040: 1452: 194:

article. I am sick and tired of this continuing censorship. If you agree with me, go and vote to save this article. Thanks, ~

84: 3651: 3643: 1067: 38: 3880: 3773: 3863: 2843: 2682:

If that is your serious position then I can't help you. It is your messy AFD request that requires deletion, not the article.

537:

debunk it (which is actually an order of magnitude more difficult a task than asserting it anyway so why should they bother?).

3015: 1854: 1520: 1474: 1323: 3239: 3137: 3023: 2847: 2375: 667:

to make clear that they are not encyclopedia articles, and should not be in any categories. I'll take care of this for you.

117:(cur) (last) 17:00, 21 February 2007 BozMo (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Brittainia (talk) to last version by Hu12) 3561:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

2472:

I'm putting this here because it explains why I am totally convinced that there must be a discussion on the article named:

3796: 3712: 3701: 3637: 1806:

their present state they do far more to show the distortion of the debate than anything I would ever be allowed to add to

386: 3671: 3631: 3255: 2486:

1. glacier gate (IPCC) 2. climategate (UEA and others) 3. Darwin fiddling of the temperature data (Australian unit)

2473: 2068: 433:

prototype wikipedia articles please put comments on my discussion page or just add the essentials to the above pages.

3764:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3313:

Isonomia, please accept my apologies for poor timing. I came to your user page as a result of investigating some edits

3120: 3034:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. 2401:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. 1301: 1087: 3875: 3769: 3036: 2382:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages. -- 1559: 3235: 1295: 3410: 3394: 3388: 2913: 2906: 1174: 1108: 1053: 3026:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages. 1300:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

254: 1567: 1516: 1515:

Boo hiss :-). I think he should be re-blocked for grammar errors: it is "struck off" not "struck of". Kids today

1470: 1126: 359: 3247: 3133: 2888: 617:

I don't know whether anyone looked at this, I'm still interested in an answer, but the pressing need has passed.

523: 3058:

over what I believe is your violation of the climate-change probation. This is a notification of that request.

2005: 1744: 1236: 3851: 3554: 3302: 3210: 1071: 2135:

strictly prohibits. If you drop this now it will not go any further, but if you attempt to refile your AfD I

2092:

I was trying to nominate this article for deletion but it says I'm using the wrong template can anyone help?

627: 3018:

to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,

2978: 1790:

Knowledge (XXG):ANI#User:Isonomia_and_keeping_Talk:Climatic_Research_Unit_e-mail_hacking_incident_managable.

1604: 1186: 758: 571: 501: 460: 3401:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3294: 3202: 3129: 2193:

MWOAP, I agree with respect to AGF, but the problem is that Isonomia has something of a track record - see

2029:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 830:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 782:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 111:

17:10, 21 February 2007 Vsmith (Talk | contribs) (if "repected scientists disagree" - provide valid source)

3334: 3281: 1342: 900: 881: 3765: 3251: 654: 3602: 3420: 1862: 1665: 849: 801: 403: 250: 3566: 3031: 2398: 1181: 2794: 2763: 2702: 2636: 2430: 2387: 2335:

in a civil manner. I don't think an editor, especially an admin, should be urging him/her to leave. --

2202: 2197:

from just a few weeks ago. I strongly suggest that he should re-read the advice he was given then. --

2144: 1221:

I restored Kim's comments. We might do this if it were a personal attack, and we might put it under a

1014: 942: 941:

At last the world is coming to know of the WikiPropaganda which we have been fighting for years. See:

3685: 3495: 2896: 2810: 2780: 2718: 2687: 2652: 2567: 2342: 1563: 1122: 839: 823: 817: 791: 775: 769: 191: 183: 146: 80: 3838: 3820: 3741: 3732: 3595: 2839: 1385: 3531: 3019: 2929: 2589: 2551: 2453: 2325: 2294: 1796: 1692: 1232: 646: 153: 3847: 3761: 3745: 3498:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 1138: 317: 272: 2974: 2790: 2759: 2698: 2632: 2426: 2383: 2224: 2198: 2140: 2046: 1982: 1944: 1909: 1727: 1630: 1600: 754: 567: 497: 456: 3516: 2562:

Whats going on with this article? just blank it and speedy delete it, I will do it if you want.

2128: 1252: 2853:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1093:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

3291:

who agree with it .... but don't leave a message here because I'm really not that interesed.

2631:

Blanking is considered vandalism and will be reverted automatically by a bot. Don't do it. --

1142: 967: 949: 927: 896: 877: 661: 541: 3859: 3757: 3749: 1683: 249:? How is merging very closely related topics the same as censorship? Were any sources lost? 3416: 3262:. In particular, please do not personally attack or harrass people with whom you disagree. 3143: 2063: 1661: 1419: 1031: 1021: 990: 892: 873: 844: 796: 725:

a belief that "Knowledge (XXG) doesn't care about scientific fact" (here) - I must be doing

395: 370:

article to be fully comfortable. I hope you are able to find the time to help out. Thanks!

310:

Final Proof of conspiracy - Raul654 filed complaint just to "get this monkey off WMC's back"

3862:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3855: 3760:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3753: 3406: 3398: 2922: 2917: 2034: 2026: 1901: 1897: 1789: 1782: 1034:

and, by association, the Satan Sluts - afterall I just wanted to read them not create them

835: 827: 787: 779: 650: 496:

Note taken. Too bad that bias opinions exists not only in politics, but also in science.

3679: 2892: 2858: 2806: 2776: 2714: 2683: 2648: 2616: 2563: 2511: 2337: 2259: 2238: 2173: 2085: 1831: 1495: 1449: 1373:

This administrator has a personal grudge against me and is not fit to be an administrator

1098: 349: 320: 283: 246: 145:

I have copied this to my wiki.racetotheright.com/GW_Bias evidence gathering location. --

76: 3322: 3055: 2286: 1936: 1893: 390: 88: 3664:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

2000:

by actual thermometer measurements. Thus, your charges are ignorant and nonsensical. --

3527: 3523: 3265: 3243: 3180: 3159: 2925: 2585: 2547: 2449: 2318: 2290: 1792: 1688: 1391: 2962: 1588: 329: 3898: 3472: 3370: 3070: 3060: 2990: 2940: 2872:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 2737: 2667: 2530: 2495: 2407: 2272: 2112: 2098: 2042: 2038: 2022: 2016: 1978: 1963: 1940: 1921: 1905: 1871: 1840: 1811: 1763: 1723: 1708: 1641: 1626: 1530: 1433: 1306: 1256: 1199: 1157: 1112:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 1035: 999: 980: 731: 708: 697: 681: 669: 601: 550: 475: 445: 434: 367: 72: 920: 393:

mailing list) and I'll be more than happy to register an account on their behalf. –

1225: 1082:. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our 963: 945: 923: 371: 300: 236: 205: 195: 137: 126: 58: 3829: 3715:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3096:

didn't exactly endear me to him or thrill me with the idea of giving him another

2969:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2544:

If you are concerned about a legal issue, contact the foundation's legal team at

1595:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

1066:

Please do not make personal attacks. Knowledge (XXG) has a strict policy against

17: 2966: 2955: 2545: 1807: 1621: 1592: 1581: 1018: 987: 3650:

justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See

2831: 1059: 2608: 2230: 2165: 2127:

title of an article, you should be discussing it on the talk page. It is also

1492: 869: 346: 339: 204:

disagree. These people are the modern equivalent of the catholic inquisition.

31: 2826:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Climatic Research Unit hacking incident

998:

I don't like reinventing the wheel, at least lets see what was there before!

3502:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 276: 166: 157: 3522:

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

2378:. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at 876:

is some discussion about the "projected continuation" wording in the lead.

522: 217:

Someone should have caught it before it passed the speedy deletion deadline

3580:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

1939:. Please consider changing your language, or be prepared for the MfD. -- 3866:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2916:

linked to from your user page and in particular, noticed it concerned a

2366: 937:

WikiPropaganda - WMC & his GW POV Censors are Finally Exposed on CBS

427: 3748:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3486:

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

3403:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie

2939:

probably is out of date. Basically I am not fussed what happens to it.

442: 423: 190:

Now Raymond Arritt and William M Connolley are trying to eradicate the

3888: 3814: 3781: 3726: 3691: 3535: 3480: 3425: 3378: 3337: 3306: 3284: 3274: 3260:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Climate change#Final decision

3214: 3189: 3168: 3078: 3064: 3044: 2998: 2982: 2948: 2933: 2900: 2814: 2798: 2784: 2767: 2745: 2722: 2706: 2691: 2675: 2656: 2640: 2623: 2593: 2571: 2555: 2538: 2503: 2457: 2434: 2415: 2391: 2348: 2329: 2298: 2285:

The procedure for requesting a move of a move-protected article is at

2280: 2245: 2206: 2180: 2148: 2120: 2106: 2073: 2050: 2009: 1986: 1971: 1948: 1929: 1913: 1879: 1865: 1848: 1819: 1800: 1771: 1748: 1731: 1716: 1696: 1669: 1649: 1634: 1608: 1571: 1538: 1524: 1498: 1478: 1459: 1441: 1400: 1264: 1240: 1207: 1191: 1165: 1146: 1130: 1043: 1024: 1007: 993: 971: 953: 931: 904: 885: 762: 735: 716: 701: 689: 673: 631: 609: 575: 558: 505: 483: 464: 448: 437: 408: 374: 352: 323: 303: 286: 258: 239: 208: 198: 169: 160: 140: 129: 96: 61: 916: 336: 233:

Is it possible to get NPOV on Knowledge (XXG) against these tactics?

3397:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 2789:

That's pretty much it, Rob. :-) Feel free to do the housework. --

2025:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 540: 915:

Sorry I am so late to congratulate you on your excellent article

2448:

to), consider that you've only been notified over 2 weeks later

3869:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2647:

The afd simply needs blanking and speedy deleting, easy peesy.

226:

Solar system warming Someguy1221 04:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

3409:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

2037:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

1553:

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

838:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

790:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

26: 3246:

if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the

414:

Need for simpler Knowledge (XXG) Articles on Global "Warming"

269:

Mike, I just got this message from Uber, he needs our help:

3544: 3446:

Not admitting simple facts like it is not currently warming.

3132:

other users. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to

3111: 2878:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

2830: 1286: 1116:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

1058: 832:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:LordsReform/New

784:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:LordsReform/New

348:- thus they are bringing Knowledge (XXG) into disrepute. -- 71:

Regarding your inquiry regarding shoes hanging from things,

3608:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

2139:

request sanctions against you for disruptive behaviour. --

2111:

Sorry, I thought I had followed the instructions on page!

3519:). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note. 3443:

Not using common names when they are used by everyone else

2380:

Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions/Climate change probation

1739:

When someone has lost the debate, they result to threats.

3805:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

3717:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2971:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1597:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1407:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

152:

Tony, you should make a user subpage, as I did with with

3787:

Nomination for deletion of Template:Article for deletion

1861:, which is every page that starts with "User:Isonomia". 1427:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3850:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3659: 3330: 3318: 3314: 3174: 2842:

for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the

1992:"Hide the decline" refers to a decline in temperatures 1679: 1356: 1352: 1346: 1337: 1333: 1319: 1315: 1311: 3654:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

1270:

Administrator is not fit to be part of Knowledge (XXG)

422:

So, I'm asking for help to create two simple articles:

3541:

File permission problem with File:LordReformLords.jpg

2031:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Isonomia

1294:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3674:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1892:May I respectfully recommend you modify the veiled 1682:edit was pure soapboxing. Please review and follow 3803:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 3242:on any editor working on pages broadly related to 3740:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1870:Thanks Josh - I knew it must be there somewhere! 3509:For established users such as yourself there is 3630:If you believe the media meets the criteria at 2522:this is not a request to change an article name 1788:You are the subject of a complaint I filed at 1640:Thanks Auswiger, that information was useful. 125:truly is appreciated by us older Wikipedians. 3670:. You may wish to read the Knowledge (XXG)'s 3221:Arbitration sanctions warning: Climate change 3136:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 2921:mainspace any time soon I plan to list it as 2869:the page that has been nominated for deletion 1109:the page that has been nominated for deletion 826:, a page you created, has been nominated for 778:, a page you created, has been nominated for 271:Hello, friend. I'd like to inform you of the 102:Thanks for fighting this insidious Censorship 8: 3910:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 3644:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags#Fair use 2601:Off2riorob, that won't solve anything & 2057:Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident 1920:actively investigated for fraud, do say so! 1857:, at the bottom there's a link to subpages: 245:Wasn't this phenomena already covered under 3905:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 1279:evidence) that soot caused global warming. 3431:PLEASE READ BEFORE ADDING ANY MORE RUBBISH 2891:the page or have a copy emailed to you. 2129:disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to make a point 1660:Thanks; I appreciate your saying that. -- 1090:from editing Knowledge (XXG). Thank you. 42:. Isonomia has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 3050:Notice of arbitration enforcement request 165:I retract that--it may get you banned. ~ 3569:or another acceptable free license (see 3575:at the site of the original publication 3565:make a note permitting reuse under the 2883:page does get deleted, you can contact 2582:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident 2372:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident 2096:Climatic_Research_Unit_hacking_incident 525:File:HadCRUT3-temp-record-alternate.svg 39:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 1937:guidelines for what is not acceptable 7: 3839:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 3238:to impose, at their own discretion, 895:to when the phrase was implemented. 649:are straining the boundaries of the 343:"getting this monkey off WMC's back" 3852:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3652:Knowledge (XXG):File copyright tags 3642:or one of the other tags listed at 1902:nominate your userpage for deletion 2474:Climatic research hacking incident 2317:So do everyone a favor and leave. 1859:Special:PrefixIndex/User:Isonomia/ 1562:). If interested, please email me 25: 3766:review the candidates' statements 2584:which is not a speedy candidate. 645:Hi. Some of your recent posts on 3828: 3791: 3707: 3632:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 3618: 3585: 3225: 3009: 2961: 2365: 1656:Re: your comment on my talk page 1587: 333:"get this monkey off WMC's back" 30: 3836:Hello, Isonomia. Voting in the 1896:on your user page. It fails to 1283:spirit and rules of wikipedia. 3772:. For the Election committee, 3742:Arbitration Committee election 3733:ArbCom elections are now open! 3676:Media copyright questions page 3411:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 3395:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 3389:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 2914:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 2907:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 2361:Article probation notification 1996:by tree ring proxies that are 1855:Special:Contributions/Isonomia 1175:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 1054:User:Isonomia/Georgina Baillie 182:Now they are trying to delete 149:14:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 1: 3889:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 3797:Template:Article for deletion 3782:13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3713:Template:Article for deletion 3702:Template:Article for deletion 3598:. If you take this step, add 3481:14:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 3379:14:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 3124:from editing for a period of 2999:11:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2983:05:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 2949:10:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 2051:01:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1987:01:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1972:01:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1949:21:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1930:20:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1914:19:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1880:13:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1866:13:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1849:12:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 1650:23:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 1635:01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 1084:biographies of living persons 1017:in case it's useful to you. 736:17:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 717:11:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 702:19:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 690:18:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 674:17:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 632:13:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 610:11:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 576:21:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 559:15:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 506:15:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 484:14:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 465:02:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 380:User Block IP 88.110.191.102. 279:23:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 259:03:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 240:05:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 209:09:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 199:04:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 170:22:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 161:19:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 141:17:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 130:17:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 3692:06:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 3668:criteria for speedy deletion 3426:21:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 3338:22:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 3307:16:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 3285:20:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3275:08:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3215:16:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC) 3190:08:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3169:08:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC) 3079:23:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 3065:22:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 3045:19:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 2934:12:55, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 2901:16:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2815:16:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2799:16:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2785:16:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2768:16:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2746:16:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2723:16:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2707:16:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2692:16:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2676:16:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2657:16:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2641:16:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2624:16:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2594:16:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2580:The article he refers to is 2572:16:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2556:16:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2539:16:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2504:15:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2458:13:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC) 2435:16:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2416:15:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2392:15:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2299:15:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2281:15:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2246:15:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2207:15:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2181:15:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2149:15:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2121:14:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2107:14:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2074:11:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1820:18:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1801:17:15, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1772:09:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1749:17:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 1732:17:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 1717:09:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1697:16:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 1670:20:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1609:01:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC) 1208:21:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1192:21:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1166:19:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1147:19:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1131:19:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1044:18:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1025:15:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1008:14:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 994:14:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 97:07:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 62:12:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 3873:and submit your choices on 3768:and submit your choices on 3037:The Resident Anthropologist 2954:Nomination for deletion of 1384:Inappropriate request, see 1298:, who declined the request. 1078:by Knowledge (XXG) and are 449:12:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 438:12:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 75:may be of interest to you. 3926: 3881:MediaWiki message delivery 3871:the candidates' statements 3774:MediaWiki message delivery 3536:18:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 3248:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 3152:, but you should read the 3054:I have filed a request at 2349:16:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 2330:15:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 1525:22:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1499:20:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1479:17:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1460:16:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1442:16:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1401:17:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1265:15:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1241:01:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 972:17:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 954:21:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 932:18:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC) 763:00:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 409:18:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 375:15:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 366:to spend some time in the 309: 3815:03:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 3727:03:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 3619: 3586: 3154:guide to appealing blocks 3134:make useful contributions 2010:05:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 1411:guide to appealing blocks 905:22:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 891:Some more digging points 886:22:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 859:15:36, May 26, 2008 (UTC) 811:15:36, May 26, 2008 (UTC) 360:Scientific data archiving 353:06:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 324:05:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 304:11:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 287:00:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 147:Tony of Race to the Right 3555:File:LordReformLords.jpg 3476: 3374: 3256:normal editorial process 3074: 2994: 2944: 2741: 2671: 2534: 2499: 2411: 2276: 2133:climate change probation 2116: 2102: 1967: 1925: 1875: 1844: 1815: 1767: 1712: 1675:Final soapboxing warning 1645: 1572:16:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1534: 1437: 1260: 1203: 1161: 1039: 1013:I've put the content at 1003: 712: 685: 605: 554: 479: 443:global warming talk page 3698:Nomination for deletion 1578:Nomination for deletion 1539:12:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 3801:nominated for deletion 3549: 3512:a workaround available 3405:and please be sure to 3116: 2887:to request that they 2835: 2033:and please be sure to 1291: 1063: 911:Global Warming Article 872:already reverted, but 834:and please be sure to 786:and please be sure to 546: 530: 265:Uber is being reviewed 44:since 10 December 2015 3848:Arbitration Committee 3821:ArbCom Elections 2016 3746:Arbitration Committee 3552:Thanks for uploading 3548: 3252:standards of behavior 3232:Arbitration Committee 3148:Your reason here ~~~~ 3115: 2834: 2079:Buggered up deleteion 1825:How do I see my pages 1343:change block settings 1290: 1062: 864:Global Warming revert 586:Wikiterm for a zealot 544: 528: 3638:non-free fair use in 3634:, use a tag such as 3496:consensus discussion 3331:note my comment here 3020:Talk:Global warming‎ 2603:Will get you blocked 2131:, which the current 1517:William M. Connolley 1471:William M. Connolley 840:User:LordsReform/New 824:User:LordsReform/New 818:User:LordsReform/New 792:User:LordsReform/New 776:User:LordsReform/New 770:User:LordsReform/New 651:talk page guidelines 192:Solar system warming 184:Solar system warming 53:Carnegie of Finhaven 3750:arbitration process 3140:by adding the text 2885:one of these admins 1894:polemical statement 1052:Speedy deletion of 917:Global Warming Scam 647:Talk:Global warming 428:Anti global warming 328:Raul654, this post 3864:arbitration policy 3823:: Voting now open! 3762:arbitration policy 3666:, as described on 3550: 3407:sign your comments 3387:MfD nomination of 3128:for attempting to 3117: 3016:your contributions 2836: 2035:sign your comments 2015:MfD nomination of 1292: 1198:ordinary she is!! 1064: 836:sign your comments 816:MfD nomination of 788:sign your comments 768:MfD nomination of 547: 531: 424:pro Global warming 273:attacks and claims 3297:comment added by 3273: 3205:comment added by 3188: 3167: 3138:appeal this block 3032:templated message 3024:article probation 2399:templated message 2376:article probation 2072: 1898:assume good faith 1399: 1076:are not tolerated 860: 812: 156:, for example. ~ 50: 49: 18:User talk:Haseler 16:(Redirected from 3917: 3832: 3812: 3810:Ten Pound Hammer 3795: 3794: 3724: 3722:Ten Pound Hammer 3711: 3710: 3688: 3682: 3672:image use policy 3641: 3625: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3607: 3601: 3592: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3547: 3505: 3501: 3424: 3309: 3272: 3270: 3263: 3229: 3228: 3217: 3187: 3185: 3178: 3166: 3164: 3157: 3151: 3114: 3013: 3012: 2973:. Thank you. -- 2965: 2864: 2863: 2857: 2622: 2619: 2614: 2611: 2516: 2510: 2468:HACKING INCIDENT 2369: 2347: 2345: 2340: 2322: 2263: 2244: 2241: 2236: 2233: 2179: 2176: 2171: 2168: 2089: 2066: 1835: 1599:. Thank you. -- 1591: 1457: 1424: 1418: 1398: 1396: 1389: 1362: 1360: 1349: 1331: 1329:deleted contribs 1289: 1230: 1224: 1189: 1184: 1104: 1103: 1097: 1080:speedily deleted 1068:personal attacks 1032:Georgina Baillie 1015:User:Isonomia/SS 847: 843: 799: 795: 666: 660: 545:Basic recreation 529:Basic recreation 526: 407: 400: 93: 34: 27: 21: 3925: 3924: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3876:the voting page 3833: 3825: 3808: 3792: 3789: 3770:the voting page 3736: 3720: 3708: 3705: 3686: 3680: 3660:your upload log 3640:|article name}} 3635: 3617: 3615: 3605: 3599: 3584: 3582: 3545: 3543: 3503: 3499: 3488: 3433: 3414: 3392: 3292: 3266: 3264: 3250:, any expected 3226: 3223: 3200: 3181: 3179: 3175:this AE request 3171: 3160: 3158: 3141: 3112: 3109: 3052: 3030:The above is a 3010: 3007: 2959: 2910: 2861: 2855: 2854: 2829: 2822:Speedy deletion 2617: 2615: 2609: 2606: 2514: 2508: 2487: 2470: 2397:The above is a 2363: 2343: 2338: 2336: 2320: 2257: 2239: 2237: 2231: 2228: 2174: 2172: 2166: 2163: 2083: 2081: 2060: 2020: 1890: 1829: 1827: 1786: 1677: 1658: 1616: 1585: 1564:Encyclopaedia21 1555: 1453: 1430: 1422: 1416: 1415:, then use the 1404: 1392: 1390: 1375: 1350: 1340: 1326: 1309: 1302:blocking policy 1287: 1272: 1228: 1222: 1216: 1187: 1182: 1178: 1123:Scott MacDonald 1101: 1095: 1094: 1086:policy will be 1057: 984: 939: 913: 866: 845: 821: 797: 773: 750: 664: 658: 643: 641:Talk page posts 588: 524: 416: 396: 394: 382: 363: 312: 267: 247:Solar variation 219: 188: 104: 89: 69: 55: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3923: 3921: 3913: 3912: 3907: 3897: 3896: 3834: 3827: 3826: 3824: 3818: 3788: 3785: 3739: 3735: 3730: 3704: 3695: 3616:permissions-en 3610: 3609: 3583:permissions-en 3578: 3542: 3539: 3524:User:Jarry1250 3487: 3484: 3451: 3450: 3447: 3444: 3432: 3429: 3391: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3311: 3310: 3299:85.211.135.213 3244:Climate change 3236:administrators 3234:has permitted 3222: 3219: 3207:85.211.135.213 3118:You have been 3110: 3108: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100:email address. 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3051: 3048: 3028: 3027: 3014:Thank you for 3006: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2958: 2952: 2912:Hi, I noticed 2909: 2904: 2848:Article Wizard 2828: 2824:nomination of 2819: 2818: 2817: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2726: 2725: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2660: 2659: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2575: 2574: 2559: 2558: 2485: 2469: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2419: 2418: 2395: 2394: 2362: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2152: 2151: 2080: 2077: 2059: 2054: 2019: 2013: 2002:98.108.199.134 1990: 1989: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1826: 1823: 1785: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1741:75.150.245.241 1720: 1719: 1676: 1673: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1615: 1612: 1584: 1575: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1463: 1462: 1405: 1382: 1378:Decline reason 1371: 1367:Request reason 1364: 1285: 1271: 1268: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1215: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1150: 1149: 1056: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 983: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 938: 935: 912: 909: 908: 907: 865: 862: 820: 814: 772: 766: 749: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 642: 639: 621: 620: 619: 618: 600: 587: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 563: 562: 561: 538: 534: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 489: 488: 487: 486: 468: 467: 415: 412: 381: 378: 362: 358:Discussion on 356: 311: 308: 307: 306: 295: 294: 266: 263: 262: 261: 218: 215: 213: 187: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 122: 121: 118: 115: 112: 103: 100: 68: 65: 54: 51: 48: 47: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3922: 3911: 3908: 3906: 3903: 3902: 3900: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3877: 3872: 3867: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3844: 3841: 3840: 3831: 3822: 3819: 3817: 3816: 3811: 3806: 3802: 3798: 3786: 3784: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3734: 3731: 3729: 3728: 3723: 3718: 3714: 3703: 3699: 3696: 3694: 3693: 3689: 3683: 3678:. Thank you. 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3655: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3639: 3633: 3628: 3626: 3624:wikimedia.org 3604: 3597: 3593: 3591:wikimedia.org 3579: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3559: 3557: 3556: 3540: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3520: 3518: 3514: 3513: 3507: 3497: 3492: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3468: 3467: 3460: 3459: 3454: 3448: 3445: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3436: 3430: 3428: 3427: 3422: 3418: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3390: 3386: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3359: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3336: 3332: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3283: 3277: 3276: 3271: 3269: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3220: 3218: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3198: 3192: 3191: 3186: 3184: 3176: 3170: 3165: 3163: 3155: 3149: 3145: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3107:February 2011 3106: 3099: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3049: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2975:Alan Liefting 2972: 2968: 2964: 2957: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2924: 2919: 2915: 2908: 2905: 2903: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2881: 2877: 2876: 2875:the talk page 2871: 2870: 2860: 2851: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2833: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2620: 2612: 2604: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2523: 2517: 2513: 2506: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2491: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2475: 2467: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2400: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2368: 2360: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2247: 2242: 2234: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2169: 2161: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2078: 2076: 2075: 2070: 2065: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2039:User:Isonomia 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023:User:Isonomia 2018: 2017:User:Isonomia 2014: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1887: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1836: 1833: 1824: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1784: 1781: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1681: 1674: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1618:Here you go: 1613: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1601:Alan Liefting 1598: 1594: 1590: 1583: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1552: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1421: 1414: 1412: 1403: 1402: 1397: 1395: 1387: 1381: 1379: 1374: 1370: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1354: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1321: 1320:global blocks 1317: 1316:active blocks 1313: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1297: 1296:administrator 1284: 1280: 1276: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1242: 1239: 1238: 1234: 1227: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1185: 1176: 1173: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1100: 1091: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1061: 1055: 1051: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 996: 995: 992: 989: 982: 981:Satanic Sluts 979: 973: 969: 965: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 951: 947: 943: 936: 934: 933: 929: 925: 921: 918: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 863: 861: 858: 857: 853: 852: 848: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 819: 815: 813: 810: 809: 805: 804: 800: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 771: 767: 765: 764: 760: 756: 755:Infonation101 747: 737: 734: 733: 728: 724: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 705: 704: 703: 700: 699: 693: 692: 691: 687: 683: 678: 677: 676: 675: 672: 671: 663: 656: 652: 648: 640: 638: 634: 633: 629: 625: 624:88.109.223.68 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 598: 595: 591: 585: 577: 573: 569: 568:Infonation101 564: 560: 556: 552: 543: 539: 535: 527: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 507: 503: 499: 498:Infonation101 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 485: 481: 477: 472: 471: 470: 469: 466: 462: 458: 457:Infonation101 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 444: 440: 439: 436: 430: 429: 425: 420: 413: 411: 410: 405: 401: 399: 392: 388: 379: 377: 376: 373: 369: 368:Pseudoscience 361: 357: 355: 354: 351: 347: 344: 340: 337: 334: 330: 326: 325: 322: 318: 316: 305: 302: 297: 296: 291: 290: 289: 288: 285: 280: 278: 274: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 227: 224: 223: 216: 214: 211: 210: 207: 201: 200: 197: 193: 185: 181: 171: 168: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 154:User:UBeR/WMC 151: 150: 148: 144: 143: 142: 139: 134: 133: 132: 131: 128: 119: 116: 113: 110: 109: 108: 101: 99: 98: 94: 92: 86: 82: 78: 74: 66: 64: 63: 60: 52: 45: 41: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 3874: 3868: 3845: 3837: 3835: 3809: 3790: 3737: 3721: 3706: 3663: 3656: 3646:, and add a 3629: 3614: 3611: 3603:OTRS pending 3581: 3574: 3560: 3553: 3551: 3521: 3510: 3508: 3493: 3489: 3469: 3464: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3452: 3437: 3434: 3393: 3357: 3328: 3312: 3278: 3267: 3224: 3196: 3193: 3182: 3172: 3161: 3147: 3125: 3119: 3097: 3068: 3059: 3053: 3029: 3008: 3005:January 2011 2960: 2937: 2911: 2879: 2873: 2866: 2852: 2844:welcome page 2837: 2733: 2602: 2600: 2526: 2521: 2518: 2507: 2492: 2488: 2482: 2478: 2471: 2396: 2364: 2326: 2319: 2284: 2269: 2265: 2256: 2159: 2136: 2110: 2094: 2091: 2082: 2061: 2021: 1998:contradicted 1997: 1993: 1991: 1961: 1891: 1837: 1828: 1804: 1787: 1721: 1700: 1678: 1659: 1625: 1620: 1617: 1586: 1556: 1454: 1431: 1426: 1408: 1406: 1393: 1383: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1366: 1365: 1338:creation log 1305: 1293: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1251: 1247: 1235: 1179: 1117: 1113: 1106: 1092: 1075: 1072:Attack pages 1065: 997: 985: 940: 914: 897:Jason Patton 878:Jason Patton 867: 855: 850: 822: 807: 802: 774: 751: 730: 726: 722: 696: 668: 644: 635: 622: 599: 596: 592: 589: 441: 431: 421: 417: 397: 391:unblock-en-l 383: 364: 342: 332: 327: 314: 313: 270: 268: 232: 231: 228: 225: 221: 220: 212: 202: 189: 123: 105: 90: 70: 56: 43: 37: 3417:Gavia immer 3329:And please 3293:—Preceding 3201:—Preceding 2967:Template:NA 2956:Template:NA 2867:the top of 2840:the sandbox 2223:Agree with 1863:Josh Parris 1808:Climategate 1662:JohnWBarber 1622:Climategate 1614:Climategate 1593:Template:NA 1582:Template:NA 1107:the top of 1074:and images 868:Looks like 846:RichardΩ612 798:RichardΩ612 748:GW Research 398:Luna Santin 3899:Categories 3860:topic bans 3758:topic bans 3681:Skier Dude 3268:Sandstein 3197:LOOK IT UP 3183:Sandstein 3162:Sandstein 2893:Off2riorob 2807:Off2riorob 2777:Off2riorob 2715:Off2riorob 2684:Off2riorob 2649:Off2riorob 2564:Off2riorob 2339:SPhilbrick 1888:Suggestion 1394:Sandstein 1386:WP:NOTTHEM 1334:filter log 1253:umpa-lumpa 1214:April 2009 729:right. :) 389:or at the 350:Brittainia 321:Brittainia 284:Brittainia 77:Dylan Lake 3856:site bans 3799:has been 3754:site bans 3648:rationale 3571:this list 3528:LivingBot 3254:, or any 3240:sanctions 2926:Nil Einne 2734:APOLOGIES 2618:Notify Me 2586:Hipocrite 2548:Hipocrite 2450:Nil Einne 2291:Hipocrite 2240:Notify Me 2227:here. -- 2175:Notify Me 1994:predicted 1793:Hipocrite 1689:Hipocrite 1409:read the 1353:checkuser 1312:block log 1233:Cool Hand 1188:cierekim 727:something 655:consensus 3567:CC-BY-SA 3517:WP:MINOR 3473:Isonomia 3458:POLITICS 3399:deletion 3371:Isonomia 3369:climate! 3295:unsigned 3203:unsigned 3146:|reason= 3126:48 hours 3071:Isonomia 3061:MastCell 3022:, is on 2991:Isonomia 2941:Isonomia 2738:Isonomia 2668:Isonomia 2531:Isonomia 2496:Isonomia 2408:Isonomia 2374:, is on 2273:Isonomia 2113:Isonomia 2099:Isonomia 2043:Scjessey 2027:deletion 1979:Scjessey 1964:Isonomia 1941:Scjessey 1935:(XXG)'s 1922:Isonomia 1906:Scjessey 1872:Isonomia 1841:Isonomia 1812:Isonomia 1764:Isonomia 1724:Ignignot 1709:Isonomia 1642:Isonomia 1627:Auswiger 1324:contribs 1307:Isonomia 828:deletion 780:deletion 732:MastCell 698:MastCell 670:MastCell 662:userpage 387:by email 3156:first. 3144:unblock 3121:blocked 1684:WP:SOAP 1420:unblock 1347:unblock 1139:Adambro 1088:blocked 964:Rameses 946:Rameses 924:Rameses 372:RonCram 251:Zebulin 237:Rameses 196:Rameses 127:Rameses 59:Trieste 3744:. The 3130:harass 2923:WP:MFD 2918:WP:BLP 2889:userfy 2880:speedy 2859:hangon 2791:ChrisO 2760:ChrisO 2699:ChrisO 2633:ChrisO 2512:Helpme 2427:ChrisO 2384:ChrisO 2321:Enigma 2260:Helpme 2225:ChrisO 2199:ChrisO 2141:ChrisO 2086:Helpme 1832:HelpMe 1783:WP:ANI 1118:speedy 1099:hangon 1022:(talk) 1019:Friday 991:(talk) 988:Friday 3504:false 3439:on: 3323:WP:AE 3056:WP:AE 2610:MWOAP 2287:WP:RM 2232:MWOAP 2167:MWOAP 2069:cont. 1904:. -- 1839:help! 1531:Bugsy 1493:BozMo 1455:juice 1450:Mango 1434:Bugsy 1413:first 1257:Bugsy 1200:Bugsy 1158:Bugsy 1036:Bugsy 1000:Bugsy 870:Oren0 709:Bugsy 682:Bugsy 602:Bugsy 551:Bugsy 476:Bugsy 446:Bugsy 435:Bugsy 67:Shoes 3885:talk 3846:The 3778:talk 3687:talk 3596:here 3577:; or 3532:talk 3500:true 3477:talk 3421:talk 3375:talk 3333:. -- 3319:here 3317:and 3315:here 3303:talk 3230:The 3211:talk 3173:See 3075:talk 3041:talk 2995:talk 2981:) - 2979:talk 2945:talk 2930:talk 2897:talk 2811:talk 2795:talk 2781:talk 2764:talk 2742:talk 2719:talk 2703:talk 2688:talk 2672:talk 2653:talk 2637:talk 2590:talk 2568:talk 2552:talk 2535:talk 2500:talk 2454:talk 2431:talk 2412:talk 2388:talk 2295:talk 2277:talk 2203:talk 2160:look 2145:talk 2137:will 2117:talk 2103:talk 2047:talk 2006:talk 1983:talk 1968:talk 1945:talk 1926:talk 1910:talk 1876:talk 1845:talk 1816:talk 1797:talk 1768:talk 1745:talk 1728:talk 1713:talk 1693:talk 1680:This 1666:talk 1646:talk 1631:talk 1607:) - 1605:talk 1568:talk 1560:here 1535:talk 1521:talk 1496:talk 1475:talk 1438:talk 1261:talk 1237:Luke 1204:talk 1183:Dloh 1162:talk 1143:talk 1127:talk 1040:talk 1004:talk 968:talk 950:talk 928:talk 901:talk 893:here 882:talk 874:here 759:talk 713:talk 686:talk 628:talk 606:talk 572:talk 555:talk 502:talk 480:talk 461:talk 426:and 404:talk 301:Mike 277:UBeR 255:talk 206:Mike 186:too! 167:UBeR 158:UBeR 138:Mike 73:This 3813:• 3738:Hi, 3725:• 3700:of 3627:. 3466:on. 3098:NEW 2865:to 2850:. 2064:2/0 1580:of 1529:QED 1357:log 1304:). 1226:hat 1105:to 723:and 319:-- 3901:: 3887:) 3879:. 3858:, 3807:. 3780:) 3756:, 3719:. 3690:) 3662:. 3636:{{ 3606:}} 3600:{{ 3573:) 3534:) 3526:, 3479:) 3415:— 3377:) 3335:TS 3305:) 3282:TS 3213:) 3150:}} 3142:{{ 3077:) 3043:) 2997:) 2947:) 2932:) 2899:) 2862:}} 2856:{{ 2813:) 2797:) 2783:) 2766:) 2744:) 2721:) 2705:) 2690:) 2674:) 2655:) 2639:) 2592:) 2570:) 2554:) 2537:) 2529:. 2515:}} 2509:{{ 2502:) 2476:. 2456:) 2433:) 2414:) 2390:) 2297:) 2289:. 2279:) 2262:}} 2258:{{ 2205:) 2147:) 2119:) 2105:) 2088:}} 2084:{{ 2049:) 2008:) 1985:) 1970:) 1947:) 1928:) 1912:) 1878:) 1847:) 1834:}} 1830:{{ 1818:) 1799:) 1770:) 1747:) 1730:) 1715:) 1695:) 1668:) 1648:) 1633:) 1570:) 1537:) 1523:) 1477:) 1440:) 1423:}} 1417:{{ 1388:. 1380:: 1369:: 1351:• 1345:• 1341:• 1336:• 1332:• 1327:• 1322:• 1318:• 1314:• 1263:) 1229:}} 1223:{{ 1206:) 1164:) 1145:) 1129:) 1102:}} 1096:{{ 1070:. 1042:) 1006:) 970:) 952:) 930:) 903:) 884:) 761:) 715:) 688:) 665:}} 659:{{ 630:) 608:) 574:) 557:) 504:) 482:) 463:) 338:, 257:) 235:~ 95:) 3883:( 3776:( 3684:( 3530:( 3475:( 3423:) 3419:( 3373:( 3301:( 3209:( 3073:( 3039:( 2993:( 2977:( 2943:( 2928:( 2895:( 2809:( 2793:( 2779:( 2762:( 2740:( 2717:( 2701:( 2686:( 2670:( 2651:( 2635:( 2621:\ 2613:| 2607:/ 2588:( 2566:( 2550:( 2533:( 2498:( 2452:( 2429:( 2410:( 2386:( 2344:T 2293:( 2275:( 2243:\ 2235:| 2229:/ 2201:( 2178:\ 2170:| 2164:/ 2143:( 2115:( 2101:( 2071:) 2067:( 2045:( 2004:( 1981:( 1966:( 1943:( 1924:( 1908:( 1874:( 1843:( 1814:( 1795:( 1766:( 1743:( 1726:( 1711:( 1691:( 1664:( 1644:( 1629:( 1603:( 1566:( 1533:( 1519:( 1473:( 1436:( 1361:) 1359:) 1355:( 1310:( 1259:( 1202:( 1160:( 1141:( 1125:( 1114:] 1038:( 1002:( 966:( 948:( 926:( 899:( 880:( 856:ɸ 851:Ɣ 808:ɸ 803:Ɣ 757:( 711:( 684:( 626:( 604:( 570:( 553:( 500:( 478:( 459:( 406:) 402:( 253:( 91:ε 87:· 85:c 83:· 81:t 79:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.