User talk:Itai/archive2 - Knowledge (XXG)

1472:. All other opinions simply don't count. I have considered leaving Knowledge (XXG) over this - my voice is to be heard throughout Knowledge (XXG) or it is not to be heard at all - but I stick around, generally from loathing to give bullies ground. The problem is that present community practices do not account for behaviors such as Netoholic's, thus allowing users to carve themselves domains from Knowledge (XXG), to which none may make modifications. There is also the problem that there is no concept or repeated light offenses, things - often trivial, as above - that were evidently done in bad faith, in favor of illegitimate goals, and cleaning up which, when they are spotted, takes time. In my humble opinions, Netoholic should be banned, for taking up to much of the editing time of other editors if nothing else. How to achieve this goal, however, I know not. — 1626:, later to be deleted for lack of users willing to verify the case) - truth be told, I am going to be away for real-world reasons for a nearly two weeks as of tomorrow, and cannot presently undertake such projects. Furthermore, launching an RFC because of dozens of unrelated (if following a certain theme) violations would appear to people unfamiliar with Netoholic as ganging up on him. In short, present Knowledge (XXG) procedures neither account for Netoholic's behavior nor provide tools to deal with it. For my part, I think I might simply abandon Knowledge (XXG) - it's not like I am at all productive these days, my entire editing time dedicated to this silly conflict (my latest attempt at solving this being 174:(Manuals for a lot of old FSF software use a similar license. Dunno if this is GFDL compatible.) In general, you have to look on a case-by-case basis for a license statement in the man page (ideally) or a license statement that came with the software. And the man page may not come with the software — many FSF programs don't even come with a man page, and use TeXinfo instead, so distros like 1240:: it's making my head spin. FWIW my opinion is that we need three templates per project, one for "stuff to be moved", and two for cross-references. Each "class" should be based upon a single master template which can then be copied across to the other sister projects to give a uniform appearance across the whole set. Maybe we could discuss this 69:

either on openbooks (hmm, I think that's what it's called) or wikibooks. Man pages aren't very encylopedic anyway, as they rarely explain what a given command really does, why you would want to use it, who wrote it, how it does what it does, and other programs you might use that do the same (or similar) tasks.

2145:

I’m writing you because this week we’re doing a show on Knowledge (XXG) including an interview with Jim Wales. We’re also looking for some particularly passionate and interesting Knowledge (XXG) users to talk to, especially users outside the US. I would love to talk to you about your involvement with

1757:

It wasn't simple vanderlism.It has been established the VFD votes are not binding in the long run (other than that admins can't delete the thing without another vote). Anoying I know. In fact I only blocked you for 12 hours. Yes I know what Netoholic is doing (which is the reason I only gave you a 12

1645:

Well, if it means anything, I spent over a week monitoring the situation and reading all the relevant pages and comments; Netoholic has clearly decided that Netoholic knows best, and community and/or consensus be damned. Accordingly, I'll be watching those Templates whenever I have a moment, and will

1275:

have done at first - test it on a few templates for a while, and see how it goes. I guarantee that template:sisterproject is incompatible with many changes I foresee and will not be used on every one of these templates. Secondly, I really do think you make some very poor design choices. This is not

1002:

As to the categorization of Austrian rulers (in which I have a slightly bigger stake since I created many of the pages), I think your proposal of having a common category for Dukes and Archdukes makes sense. There is the additional problem that not all Archdukes were also rulers, which is why I would

935:

I wasn't sure what you were saying with archdukes, sorry. I don't think I disagree with anything you are saying. In terms of Czech monarchs, since it's exactly the same thing, I don't see any reason to preserve both. I think I would agree with keeping the Dukes in the category - it's irritating we

563:

where User:HistoryBuffer insists on inserting: that Israel "in contravention of the Partition plan, began killing and ethnically cleansing Palestinian Arab population. Palestine's five neighbour states then attacked Israel."...When no-one but he says this, and refuses to accept anything else. He also

107:

I did as Finlay suggested regarding adding a link (thanks for the GPL clarification, by the way). There does not appear to be any additional encyclopedic content in the man page that would not be better served simply by consulting the man page, which it is safe to assume all those who need use rlogin

68:

I think linux manpages are probably GPL, as they're distributed in source and binary packages that are GPL. My understanding is that, for our purposes, GPL and GFDL are sufficiently compatible. I think including chunks of a man page wholesale is generally a bad idea, as documentation really belongs

1520:

of the Knowledge (XXG), so not many people notice his behaviour. Worse yet, it also means that the people frustrated with him in one area don't know that he is causing problems in other areas. In the end, though, it is like suffering a death from a thousand paper cuts. In some ways, I think that his

1503:

I am not disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to make a point. As a matter of fact, I am not disrupting it at all. The community has decided, Netoholic. As for your turning the template into a redirect, such audacity I have never seen on the 'pedia before. You should be banned, Netoholic. (Of course, in the

1208:

Hi! good job on the French communes! Could we use categories in the format "Communes of Seine-Saint-Denis" rather than "Communes of the Seine-Saint-Denis département"? I have already placed communes of Calvados under such a category. The advantage is that it contains the same information in a much

31:

Feel free to leave me messages here. Note that I may reply in this talk page or in your own, unless you specifically ask me to reply in either place (or, better yet, not reply at all). I will try to archive everything written here that isn't overly blasphemous, but if it's important, make sure you

1893:

Itai - it's more like this... if you'd rather you and I work this out, you'll ask Snowspinner to remove the evidence from the Arbitration. I can assure you if you don't, I have to defend myself and show that you're just disruptively reverting the templates to make a point and that my actions are

1769:

Well, at least you know what Netoholic's been doing... No hard feelings on my part. Not to mentions that blocks are a wonderful thing that allows me to get a good night's sleep. (I would that I could set up an auto-block to block me for 8 hours a day.) Presently, I am of the opinion that it's all

579:

Let me inform you that you are far out of line to request an RFC on me. At best, this is a content dispute. I have violated no policies through this. Your RFC complaint cannot be certified by a second person, because noone else is involved. Listing that improper RFC is the same as a direct

1371:? I think the work is complete, but I'm a little hesitant to say so; could I ask you to determine the status and either add an appropriate note to the "Other Notes" section of the request or delete the request and make an entry in the "Recently Completed Translations" section? Thanks. -- 1258:

Itai - you are a fool, and a troublemaker. Damaging articles and adding burden to the servers by fighting over your shit-poor templates is a bad effort. Please stop. You also didn't even bother to check what you were reverting. Let the vote finish, and then we will consider using the

131:

Linux software is under the GPL (if you take "Linux" to mean "Linux distribution" as is common). Even if you restrict yourself to e.g. GNU utilities, the man page licenses differ from case to case, and may be different from the software. For example, the man page for gzip is under the

546:

Actually I don't have a list, I just try to remember and add a new one periodically so they don't get too stale. I'll try and work something up on Magic Button, although I wonder how helpful that is for the general audience if it doesn't work on IE. But any other ideas are welcome too.

752:

Apparently I did. Anyway, I don't know enough on the subject to know whether Shah is also applicable to the kings of old, but if this is the case, I have not the slightest objection to having the category renamed. (I'll even help doing it manually if a bot run cannot be arranged.) --

1291:

is considered to be vandalism. Stop making edits which have no consensus and which impact the server performance. There is no chance that your changes will remain in place, until you have presented a properly run survey and have shown enough consensus to warrant the change. --

846:

is probably more correct (being the historical entity), and with you that it should be subcategorized. No objections raised. (By the way, the reason I created this category is not because I found this particular subject to be of interest, but because I've taken a fancy to adding

2014:, has been protected since March 4 to prevent a revert war (on your version of that page, I note). Given that you and Netoholic seem determined to have an edit war over these things, it seems they will be protected for a long time - that one's been that way for almost a month. 1833:

as a legal means of dispute resolution. Let others judge who is right and who is wrong, no need to worry if you feel that you have done nothing wrong. Perhaps you may also want to consider taking a WikiVacation and come back feeling better to settle this dispute.

149:

Permission is granted to process this file through troff and print the results, provided the printed document carries copying permission notice identical to this one except for the removal of this paragraph (this paragraph not being relevant to the printed

1276:

an insult, its just that this area is one I am pretty good at, and would like you to see that and work slowly and surely in the future. Keep in mind, these templates have been very stable for a long time while you were gone. Why rush in haphazardly? --

55:

Two questions: (1) under what license are Unix man pages released? (I guess that those used by GNU Linux, use, well, GFDL, but want to ascertain this.) (2) Is there a policy regarding inclusion of whole or part of man pages on Knowledge (XXG)? In the

1468:, to orphan a template about whose necessity we were arguing. The problem with Netoholic is that while he is pro-Knowledge (XXG) (and has made many good edits to show it), he is also decisively anti-community - that is, he is pro-Knowledge (XXG) 877:

There were no Archdukes of Bohemia, or were you saying something else. Should Maria Theresa go under "Kings of Bohemia" then? I believe that in Bohemia (unlike Hungary) she was actually Queen, rather than King, although I'm not sure on that.

740:

Hi, I was wondering why you created the category "Kings of Persia" rather than the more commonly used "Shahs of Persia". The rule is not to translate everything into English, but to used what is most commonly used in English, which is Shah.

771:

This has come to that point when we are both too lazy to file a request for the category to be moved, and tension is mounting. However, I doubt not that I shall prevail, being far lazier. Just wait and see. (For my part, I'll just wait.) --

155:

Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this

1912:, but I HAVE seen that you haven't made your case. Until such time as you can garner a consensus of editors to enjoin the use of Meta-Templates, I am specifically forbidding you to prevent other editors from using them.Is that clear? 284:

Alas, not only is this not an area in which I'm qualified to make judgment, but I'm also off for one week as of today. When I got back I'll be sure to check if this issue is not yet resolved, and do my best to assist if necessary. --

1711:

If you're my sock puppet, I'm a very talented puppeteer - I didn't even know I had a puppet, and must have been using it while away. (Of course, Netoholic's accusations can be ignored, and it's nice to see someone else cares.) —

88:

While I don't think that command-line parameters from the man page would be appropriate in an encyclopedia article, the man pages do provide some encyclopedic content, such as "related topics", and POSIX standards information. -

161:

Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that this permission notice may be stated in a translation approved by the

1812:

Just happened to look at the RC and was rather surprised that you are calling a ban for Netoholic. As frustrated as you might be, don't forget to observe Knowledge (XXG)'s official policies. :) Avoid calling for ban or blocks.

1517: 841:

I didn't pay much heed to Category:Czech monarchs (mostly because a monarch is hardly a monarch unless he has a million titles), however, going over it right now, I agree that there's a duplicity. I agree with john that

2247:

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in

2048:. There are other suspects as well. I am notifying you because the evidence is at a site you may not have been watching, which I suspect is not true for the others. Apologies if you are not the one.-- 1618:

Well phrased, well said. (Nooks and corners, templates, ownership, edit wars – a fair outline of Netoholic.) Actually, Netoholic is pretty amazing a fellow. As for launching an RFC (which I tried once -

1270:

I want you to understand two things. First of all, a TFD discussion only decides "Delete or No" - it does not give a clear mandate to use that template everywhere. After its done, we should do what you

1688:

means that I am assumed to be your sockpuppet, and that it fans the flames. He has outright accused me of being your sockpuppet, and has circumvented the 3RR. I can take the heat; I've naught to lose.

1221:

PLEASE stop screwing around with these templates. You are attempting to "fix" something that just isn't broken. These have worked fine for months without your really poorly implemented changes. --

420:

section; there is a lot more beyond that. The slant was very different from the English, and there were some outright contradictions, so it's been a tricky merge. Review would be very welcome. --

1890:

You've already made him a direct party by adding the current evidence. In his case, the Arbitrators will see evidence that recently his only activity is to return and revert these templates.

2080: 443: 1031:. I think non-ruling Archdukes (and consorts etc.) should remain in the latter group. Another question would be whether it makes more sense to subdivide them depending whether they were 1492:

that is banned before I. You have been told repeatedly that editing those templates is a significant hit on server performance. They are not broken, and your edits will not stand. --

351: 1770:

quite pointless, that the community does not care, that Netoholic will win through unscrupulous persistence, and that maybe I should simply quit Knowledge (XXG). Gloomy, I know. —

1908:

Netoholic, I have observed this dispute impartially, and I have made my decision. I can pass any objective test you set. I will point out that I have NO IDEA how templates work,

908:. I do not think it would make any sense to create a separate "Queens of Bohemia" category for Maria Theresia alone. The logical consequence is to categorize her with the Kings. 1865: 1449: 1096: 723: 229:

When I clicked on the "Edit this box" at the bottom of the Ketuvim template (to try to add Song of Songs myself), the information that comes up in the box is from the

1591: 1895: 144:

Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies.

1595: 1129: 555:"(Israel) in contravention of the Partition plan, began killing and ethnically cleansing Palestinian Arab population. Palestine's five neighbour states then.." 525: 519: 73:

is (as of right now) perfectly encyclopedic (if rather too short), and I think an exlink to some LDP mirror for the man contents is probably the best idea. --

2252:? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- 560: 1583: 503:

Other notes: Article currently machine-translated (by Google, I think), and thus highly amusing. A proper translation might be a better idea, however. --

427:

Done. Article could possibly use some cleanup (redundancies, links, specific citations for specific facts rather than just an annotated bibliography). --

108:

can locate on their own. I agree that the essence of the program - what it does - is far more useful than command-line parameters to the lay reader. --

315: 2142:

My name is Robin Amer and I’m a producer for an American public radio show called Open Source, which you can check out at www.radioopensource.org.

1610:). As part of your evidence, you should include a list of those editors who have quit editing, at least in part, because of Netoholic's behaviour. 1541: 1898:. I still hold hope that one day you will stop reverting endlessly, but if I'm wrong, then let just allow him add evidence on your behalf. -- 459: 1853: 1368: 2164: 2060:

Itai, don't revert this guy's "meta-template" stomps so quickly. I'm going to watch him, too. Don't let him make it a one-on-one fight. —

973:-- I stopped reading yours, but I will do so now again. I wasn't aware that there is a separate categories for deletion process and page. 912:

including Kings (and Maria Theresia) only, but not the Dukes makes no sense, although a gender-neutral category of course has its appeals.

2232: 1602:

with a goal of taking things all the way to arbitration for all of his violations of Knowledge (XXG) policy (as well as his violations of

1553: 780: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 60:

entry, for instance, it is awfully tempting to include sections of the man page, but I do not know whether there's a relevant policy. --

2116: 1934: 1742: 1623: 1587: 416:

This is proving to be a bit of a monster. I started on this 18 Sept & I've brought in all of the material that corresponds to the

193:

Urgh. Well, so much for Man pages, except, as you say, on a case-by-case basis. I really am disappointed with the FSF on that one. --

1568: 1063:

all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the

1003:

like to keep those who were not out of all ruler categories and rather retain title-neutral category names. At the moment, there is

1599: 1242: 2046: 2249: 2097: 2075:

The guy is a kind of human HIV virus, attacking the immune system of his victim. He's managed to get a few other users I've seen

2066: 417: 377: 357: 2025:

Hi, sorry I've been slow to get back to you - I've been offline, sick. More in a bit, once I'm caught up on my mop/broom stuff.

1823: 1579: 1549: 1287:

Now that you know the negative impact of unnecessary edits to templates used on so many pages, your excessive edit warring over

299: 1758:

hour block) however breaking the 3RR is not the answer. Have you tired contacting that other people who voted in the TFD vote?

1412:

That's cool. I think it's a good idea, and things are often better after they've had a chance to marinate. Have a good week.

1961: 1530: 1464:

Netoholic does that sort of thing. He also frequently orphans template which he does not like, and have even used his bot,

1024: 1387:

Why can't you go do something productive? Why do you have to do things that take others away from being productive? --

2225: 1020: 1237: 1113: 1060: 1627: 866:. Now they should be nicely categorized as Dukes and Kings respectively. Just in case you are going to take a look at 2007: 2011: 982: 947: 920: 909: 819: 808:

I would suggest that "Bohemian Monarchs" is the more appropriate category, although I agree they should be merged.

791: 2120: 1984: 1938: 1746: 1398: 1028: 905: 901: 867: 863: 852: 848: 93: 78: 1557: 1004: 897: 1099:

Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at

1072: 1603: 1545: 734: 2272: 2042: 1913: 1689: 1647: 978: 951: 924: 823: 798: 26: 851:- I'm a busy categorizer ant - and figured we could do with a category to contain everybody else listed in 1430: 1304: 1288: 1251: 1879:

Add, please. If you'd rather not become a direct party to the case, feel free to e-mail me the evidence.

1537: 1438: 2172: 1457: 1334: 940: 882: 812: 765: 745: 271: 1814: 1561: 1977: 1880: 1817:). In fact, Netoholic is using your violations of official policies aganist you and to his advantage. 1611: 1124:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "

257:

Request for assistance in a conflict between users regarding Canaanite and Hebrew linguistics articles

2258: 2236: 1954: 1320: 997:, who are probably also Czech monarchs, but not Bohemian ones. I will post this on the deletion page. 628: 90: 74: 1864:. The case has not been officially accepted yet though. You may also be interested in going through 1453: 2128: 1902: 1793: 1556:

when he wants a way to bludgeon someone he is in an edit war with. He writes cryptic or misleading

1526: 1496: 1391: 1296: 1280: 1263: 1225: 596: 584: 302:

and perhaps you could join and contribute to it. (This is NOT related to the above issue). Thanks.

1957:

and similar templates, but your recent edit summary "revert, until trumpets sound for all I care"

1872: 1838: 1574:

For an example of how Netoholic works, you might want to look at the controversy over his use of

1349: 783:. Of course, as this requires a bot, having the category replaced could take quite some time. -- 619: 600: 2091:

on page after page. I think he's just about worked his way across every page I ever touched. —

1485: 1103:

those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

985:. From some point in time onwards, all the Dukes, later Kings of Bohemia were also Margraves of 1083:

license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Knowledge (XXG)'s license, the

368: 1990:

I've linked this from the page on resolving disputes, so it is "live" now. Have also asked at

1247: 1197: 1184: 1107: 970: 663: 548: 1236:, but could the two of you please come to some sort of agreement on the various templates in 954:(redirects don't work yet). Other than that, it seems everything is properly categorized. -- 413:: Not urgent, as English article is pretty comprehensive. (note put here by original poster) 1560:

or uses them as a substitute for dialogue on an article's talk page. He regularly gets into

1376: 1064: 937: 879: 809: 762: 742: 237:

By the way, where does one see the list of templates on Knowledge (XXG)? Best wishes again.

210:

Hi Itai, congratulations on the new Tanakh template boxes. I have picked up a few problems:

2112: 1991: 1930: 1830: 1738: 1442: 1141:

I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

2253: 2100: 2069: 2049: 1861: 1607: 1308: 246: 219: 2199:(1958-1961). Are you able to provide some history and information about them? Thank you. 256: 2146:

the site. If you are interested, please give me a call at 617-497-8096, or email me at

2124: 1899: 1790: 1775: 1717: 1666: 1635: 1509: 1493: 1477: 1434: 1388: 1293: 1277: 1260: 1233: 1222: 1159:

I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:

581: 17: 2275: 2184: 2029: 2018: 1995: 1829:

If you think you are right in this dispute, I recommend that you go ahead and file a

1413: 1405: 1338: 1076: 1012: 994: 989:. However, this is not necessarily true in earlier times, especially with respect to 831: 475: 322: 215: 1598:), you shouldn't have any trouble getting at least a dozen people to sign on for an 691:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Palestinian_terrorist_organizations

2196: 2188: 1210: 1189: 1044: 936:

don't have a gender-neutral word that includes kings and excludes dukes...ah well.

928: 913: 871: 835: 802: 179: 511:

I didn't transfer the map over from the German. If you want it, go right ahead...

1533:, so if he gets into an edit war on one of those, it effects many more articles. 2224:

Thank you for all the work in categorizing the math lists, and for creating the

2176: 2147: 1575: 1465: 1372: 1118: 1056: 703:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Islamic_terrorist_organizations

428: 421: 404: 330: 223: 1303:

FYI: Less than a month after it survived the TfD vote, Netoholic has again put

1166:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "

707:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Jewish_terrorist_organizations

2180: 2092: 2061: 1965: 1092: 653: 512: 497: 2278: 2213: 2210: 2203: 2200: 2192: 1942: 1771: 1759: 1750: 1713: 1662: 1646:

act accordingly. I've got no dog in this fight; I just can't abide a bully.

1631: 1505: 1473: 1132:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: 1036: 1032: 955: 893: 856: 784: 773: 761:

Yeah, Shah is used for all the rulers from the Safavid Dynasty on, I'd say.

754: 727: 711: 643: 568: 535: 504: 490: 463: 447: 395: 392: 338: 303: 286: 276: 262: 238: 194: 109: 61: 33: 870:, it's not always clear which ones are Dukes and which ones are Archdukes. 564:

insists on editing-away lots of NPOV's that don't suit him, take a look at

2231:

By the way, if you have some interest in math, I would invite you to join

486:

Worth doing because: Material to incorporate into English-language article

2026: 2015: 1522: 1364: 1008: 889: 801:? I don't quite see the reason for the new one and have set a merge tag. 2165:

History of the Israel Defense Forces#List of Chiefs of the General Staff

1536:

Netoholic doesn't work well with others, and either ignores or subverts

900:

according to the title (Margrave/Duke/Archduke), as he began to do with

699:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Terrorist_organizations

2096: 2065: 986: 695:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Middle_East_terrorists

687:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion#Category:Palestinian_terrorists

667: 481: 1333:

Itai, I have 24-hour-blocked you for your part in the revert war over

1232:

I have no particular axe to grind in the contest between yourself and

797:

Hi! When creating this category, did you notice that there is already

1582:. I am sure that with just a little digging (including checking past 230: 175: 70: 57: 1209:

more concise way, and saves space in the category line of articles.

580:

personal attack, and for right now I will ask you to remove it. --

2037:

Notice, you have been mentioned as a possible owner of a sockpuppet

1016: 438:

Vote: Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Violence against Israelis

1188:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- 892:

of Bohemia? What is that supposed to mean??? I was suggesting to

561:

History of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict#The war for Palestine

1175: 1128:" template into their user page, but there are other options at 1084: 990: 827: 595:

Thanks, that list should be useful. (That was a quick reply!) —

1822:. I know that he has has called you a fool and a troublemaker ( 222:) in the Ketuvim template. It should be the fourth item after 1193: 565: 531: 1567:

discussing things on talk pages. He often acts if he is the

1404:

That looks good. I've made some tweaks. See what you think.

444:

Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Violence against Israelis

1976:

Got it - I'll add it before I leave town tomorrow morning.

1894:

justified because of the technical problems documented at

352:

Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/Occupation of Palestine

314:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hebrew languages. Please join

2271:

Your requested translation is done; I splitted it off to

1363:

Could you take a look at your request for translation of

530:

Vote "NO". Opposed to SamSpade's unfriendly views in the

261:

Your interest and input would be appreciated. Thank you.

1958: 1866:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/172 2/Evidence

1820: 1818: 1620: 1446: 1426: 1352: 779:

Fine, I gave up first. A request has been submitted to

385:: Material to incorporate into English-language article 724:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/IZAK/Evidence

670:

and put it in the categories for prophets and religion

2079:

while trying to deal with his vandalism. Now he's in

2045:

may be your sock puppet. I present the evidence at

1516:The problem with Netoholic is that he works in the 329:You'd asked for this one. It's been translated. -- 1571:of the article or template that he is working on. 1529:'s of the world because he specializes in editing 554: 1896:Knowledge (XXG):Meta-templates considered harmful 1624:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comments/Netoholic 2 1095:, to use our articles. Since you are among the 896:to be careful if he also wants to subcategorize 526:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Sam Spade 520:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Sam Spade 2115:. If you wish to appeal please contact another 1933:. If you wish to appeal please contact another 1741:. If you wish to appeal please contact another 1960:is alarming. Please note that the wording of 1826:), but two wrongs simply don't make a right. 2111:You have been blocked for 24 hours under the 1964:does not create an entitlement to revert. -- 1929:You have been blocked for 24 hours under the 1737:You have been blocked for 12 hours under the 274:. Your input would be appreciated. Thank you. 233:template section/s, so that is a big problem. 8: 1953:I'm not taking sides in the revert war over 1486:disrupt Knowledge (XXG) just to make a point 1043:Looking forward to your comments and ideas, 316:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hebrew languages 310:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hebrew languages 1548:. He calls anyone who disagrees with him a 946:Seeing as Martg76 does not object to using 1019:, but not Austria proper, and which has a 950:, I've filed a motion for the deletion of 834:(none of whom appears to have a page yet. 270:Update: The above discussion was moved to 127:assumption to make. First of all, hardly 2155:Best, Robin Amer www.radioopensource.org 2041:Itai, evidence leads me to suspect that 460:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/IZAK 1369:Knowledge (XXG):Translation_into_English 1007:(which also includes those lines of the 683:categories up for "votes of deletion": 480:Corresponding English-language article: 2233:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Mathematics 675:Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_deletion 294:re: Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Judaism 178:write or generate their own man pages. 625:Corresponding English-language article 374:Corresponding English-language article 1027:, which is a separate subcategory of 7: 1852:You may be interested to know, that 1630:). It's really quite frustrating. — 1025:Category:Non-ruling Austrian royalty 1824:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks 1580:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Bots/Archive 5 300:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Judaism 2226:Category:Derivatives and integrals 1628:Template talk:Sisterproject#Enough 1421:Netoholic/Sister project templates 1178:, I would like to know that too. 636:: No corresponding English article 24: 1962:Knowledge (XXG):Three revert rule 1174:". If you only prefer using the 981:is not completely identical with 2149:and send me your phone number. 2135:radio show about Knowledge (XXG) 2095: 2064: 1858:has been filed aganist Netoholic 1130:Template messages/User namespace 1119:Free the Rambot Articles Project 378:Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor 358:Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor 2006:Well, I note that according to 1789:Don't quit Knowledge (XXG). -- 1238:Knowledge (XXG):Sister projects 1168:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 1162:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 1144:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 1126:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} 298:Hi Itai, please have a look at 2167:, there are no articles about 2008:Knowledge (XXG):Protected page 904:, which I completed by adding 1: 2267:Battle of Soissons translated 1985:Knowledge (XXG):Third opinion 1399:Knowledge (XXG):Third opinion 919:Of course, if you think that 2163:Hi Itai: As you can see at: 1521:behaviour is worse than the 1504:end they'll ban us both.) — 1110:- Lots of questions answered 1021:Category:Emperors of Austria 318:Your input will be crucial. 2243:lots of edits, not an admin 1594:(plus his "fanclub" in his 1433:is not the first time that 1355:) 11:47, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) 977:I think that historically, 969:thanks for your message at 962:Austrian and Czech monarchs 826:, which would also include 2294: 2263:22:49, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) 2012:Template:Wikisource author 1994:about linking from there. 1980:22:19, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC) 1720:) 01:47, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1684:Please be advised that it 1669:) 01:30, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1661:It means a lot. Thanks. — 1254:17:36, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC) 1213:14:29, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC) 1067:Attribution-Share Alike ( 1005:Category:Rulers of Austria 983:Category:Bohemian monarchs 948:Category:Bohemian monarchs 921:Category:Bohemian monarchs 910:Category:Bohemian monarchs 898:Category:Rulers of Austria 822:could be a subcategory of 820:Category:Bohemian monarchs 792:Category:Bohemian monarchs 603:17:30, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC) 206:Re:Ketuvim tempalate/s etc 2279:10:16, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 2228:. That is very helpful. 2087:out there stenciling his 2052:21:35, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) 2021:17:03, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) 2010:, another of this group, 1998:02:57, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1968:16:42, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1945:10:05, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1905:06:42, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC) 1883:06:36, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC) 1875:03:15, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1778:) 09:18, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1638:) 07:54, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1512:) 16:59, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1488:, I'll ensure that it is 1480:) 16:10, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1448:, which he did after the 1408:06:53, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1394:22:58, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC) 1379:19:18, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC) 1325:06:05, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1299:03:02, 2005 Feb 12 (UTC) 1283:03:06, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC) 1266:10:29, 2005 Jan 28 (UTC) 1228:17:28, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC) 1200:19:33, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC) 1047:00:41, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC). 1029:Category:Austrian history 923:should take the place of 906:Category:Kings of Bohemia 902:Category:Dukes of Bohemia 868:List of rulers of Austria 864:Category:Kings of Bohemia 853:List of rulers of Bohemia 849:Category:Dukes of Bohemia 662:: I added the bit on the 656:09:55, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC) 587:16:41, 2004 Oct 15 (UTC) 571:08:34, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC) 551:00:02, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) 538:08:49, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC) 515:19:27, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC) 489:Originally Requested by: 431:07:03, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC) 424:23:13, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC) 407:07:03, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC) 333:06:50, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC) 306:23:29, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC) 249:vs. "Canaanite languages" 241:07:10, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC) 182:05:59, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC) 36:19:48, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC) 2239:20:22, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2214:07:16, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2209:This has now been done. 2204:11:00, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 2131:19:11, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) 2103:12:42, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC) 2072:12:27, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC) 2032:22:45, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1916:02:07, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1856:Requests for arbitration 1841:18:49, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1815:Knowledge (XXG):Civility 1753:18:22, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1692:01:38, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1650:21:51, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1614:05:48, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1499:16:51, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC) 1460:12:08, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1416:08:52, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1217:Sister project templates 1035:(Magraves and Dukes) or 958:22:32, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) 943:06:50, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 927:, this is fine with me. 885:04:39, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 874:01:52, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 862:I created a subcategory 859:00:42, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 838:22:07, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 815:21:56, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 805:21:31, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 787:22:44, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) 776:00:44, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 768:21:25, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 748:21:10, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 735:Category:Kings of Persia 730:07:03, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC) 714:10:10, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC) 646:19:29, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) 500:19:27, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC) 470:Frohnau translation done 466:02:59, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC) 450:09:29, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC) 396:02:34, 20 May 2004 (UTC) 265:09:26, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC) 197:23:40, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC) 96:15:25, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC) 64:11:58, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC) 32:keep a copy as well. -- 2273:Battle of Soissons(486) 2175:' Chiefs of Staff: (1) 2159:Articles for IDF Chiefs 2043:User:KingOfAllPaperboys 1796:03:03, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC) 1762:08:22, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) 1622:, later to be moved to 979:Category:Czech monarchs 952:Category:Czech monarchs 931:05:21, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 925:Category:Czech monarchs 916:05:18, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) 824:Category:Czech monarchs 799:Category:Czech monarchs 757:21:17, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 640:Originally Requested by 620:de:Vaticinium ex eventu 507:16:01, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC) 493:16:01, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC) 389:Originally Requested by 341:14:55, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC) 289:09:32, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC) 279:06:51, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC) 112:21:45, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC) 81:15:18, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC) 1540:. I've never seen him 1431:Template:Sisterproject 1305:Template:Sisterproject 1289:Template:Sisterproject 1039:(Dukes and Archdukes). 369:de:Friedrich II. (HRR) 2173:Israel Defense Forces 1542:Work toward agreement 1441:soon after loosing a 1335:Template:Wikibookspar 1182:what you think at my 1114:Multi-Licensing Guide 1079:if they prefer. The 1011:dynasty who ruled in 272:Talk:Hebrew languages 2235:. It can be fun. :) 1955:Template:Wikispecies 1831:Request for comments 1246:, like grown-ups? -- 629:Vaticinium ex eventu 608:Vaticinium ex eventu 2171:(out of 18) of the 1552:. He only observes 1527:User:Plautus satire 1484:If you continue to 1259:meta-template. -- 1108:Multi-Licensing FAQ 634:Worth doing because 383:Worth doing because 1914:KingOfAllPaperboys 1805:Dispute Resolution 1690:KingOfAllPaperboys 1648:KingOfAllPaperboys 1518:nooks and crannies 1180:Please let me know 1172:{{MultiLicensePD}} 1023:subcategory), and 993:and the rulers of 830:and the rulers of 705:and this one too: 214:You have left out 180:—Steven G. Johnson 2262: 2195:(1961-1963); (6) 2191:(1972-1974); (5) 2187:(1974-1978); (4) 2183:(1983-1987); (3) 2179:(1987-1991); (2) 2113:three revert rule 2107:Three revert rule 1931:three revert rule 1925:Three revert rule 1739:three revert rule 1733:Three revert rule 1608:m:Don't be a dick 1425:FYI: This recent 1346: 1342: 1307:up for deletion. 1051:Article Licensing 666:. I linked it in 664:Sibylline oracles 591:Belarus adjective 476:de:Berlin-Frohnau 2285: 2256: 2152:Thanks so much. 2099: 2068: 1445:nomination. See 1344: 1340: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1087:, but it allows 1071:) v1.0 and v2.0 1065:Creative Commons 1059:to get users to 718:Opinion for IZAK 454:Need for support 253:Hi, please see: 2293: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2269: 2245: 2237:Oleg Alexandrov 2222: 2161: 2137: 2109: 2058: 2039: 2004: 1988: 1974: 1951: 1927: 1847: 1845:RfA : Netoholic 1807: 1735: 1423: 1402: 1385: 1361: 1331: 1321: 1314: 1309: 1219: 1206: 1204:French communes 1057:started a drive 1053: 964: 795: 738: 720: 677: 612: 593: 577: 557: 544: 542:Tips of the day 523: 472: 456: 440: 403:: Complete. -- 361: 348: 327: 312: 296: 251: 247:Hebrew language 220:Song of Solomon 208: 91:DropDeadGorgias 75:Finlay McWalter 46: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2291: 2289: 2268: 2265: 2244: 2241: 2221: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2160: 2157: 2136: 2133: 2108: 2105: 2057: 2054: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2003: 2000: 1987: 1982: 1973: 1970: 1950: 1947: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1891: 1885: 1884: 1846: 1843: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1764: 1763: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1640: 1639: 1558:edit summaries 1514: 1513: 1482: 1481: 1454:Template:CatAZ 1452:was to retain 1435:User:Netoholic 1422: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1401: 1396: 1384: 1381: 1360: 1357: 1330: 1327: 1302: 1286: 1269: 1257: 1231: 1218: 1215: 1205: 1202: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1089:other projects 1052: 1049: 1041: 1040: 999: 998: 963: 960: 933: 932: 917: 794: 789: 759: 758: 737: 732: 719: 716: 676: 673: 672: 671: 657: 647: 637: 631: 622: 611: 605: 592: 589: 576: 573: 556: 553: 543: 540: 522: 517: 509: 508: 501: 494: 487: 484: 478: 471: 468: 455: 452: 439: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 425: 408: 398: 386: 380: 371: 360: 355: 347: 344: 343: 342: 337:Thank you! -- 326: 320: 311: 308: 295: 292: 291: 290: 281: 280: 250: 243: 235: 234: 227: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 186: 185: 184: 183: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 158: 152: 146: 136: 135: 134: 133: 118: 117: 116: 115: 114: 113: 100: 99: 98: 97: 83: 82: 53: 52: 45: 42: 40: 38: 23: 18:User talk:Itai 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2290: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2274: 2266: 2264: 2260: 2255: 2251: 2242: 2240: 2238: 2234: 2229: 2227: 2219: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185:Mordechai Gur 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2158: 2156: 2153: 2150: 2148: 2143: 2140: 2134: 2132: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2117:administrator 2114: 2106: 2104: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2055: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2044: 2036: 2031: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2001: 1999: 1997: 1993: 1986: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1971: 1969: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1956: 1948: 1946: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1935:administrator 1932: 1924: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1874: 1873:Mailer Diablo 1869: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1857: 1850: 1844: 1842: 1840: 1839:Mailer Diablo 1835: 1832: 1827: 1825: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1810: 1804: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1743:administrator 1740: 1732: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1544:or engage in 1543: 1539: 1534: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1519: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1458:4.232.144.115 1455: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1420: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1407: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1382: 1380: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1358: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1336: 1328: 1326: 1324: 1319: 1317: 1312: 1306: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1290: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1274: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1255: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1235: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1216: 1214: 1212: 1203: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1131: 1127: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1077:public domain 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061:multi-license 1058: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013:Inner Austria 1010: 1006: 1001: 1000: 996: 995:Great Moravia 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 975: 974: 972: 967: 961: 959: 957: 953: 949: 944: 942: 939: 930: 926: 922: 918: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 888: 887: 886: 884: 881: 875: 873: 869: 865: 860: 858: 854: 850: 845: 839: 837: 833: 832:Great Moravia 829: 825: 821: 816: 814: 811: 806: 804: 800: 793: 790: 788: 786: 782: 777: 775: 769: 767: 764: 756: 751: 750: 749: 747: 744: 736: 733: 731: 729: 726:. Thank you. 725: 717: 715: 713: 709: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 682: 674: 669: 665: 661: 658: 655: 651: 648: 645: 641: 638: 635: 632: 630: 626: 623: 621: 617: 614: 613: 609: 606: 604: 602: 598: 590: 588: 586: 583: 574: 572: 570: 566: 562: 552: 550: 541: 539: 537: 533: 528: 527: 521: 518: 516: 514: 506: 502: 499: 495: 492: 488: 485: 483: 479: 477: 474: 473: 469: 467: 465: 462:. Thank you. 461: 453: 451: 449: 446:. Thank you. 445: 437: 430: 426: 423: 419: 415: 414: 412: 409: 406: 402: 399: 397: 394: 390: 387: 384: 381: 379: 375: 372: 370: 366: 363: 362: 359: 356: 354: 353: 345: 340: 336: 335: 334: 332: 324: 323:Schiessbefehl 321: 319: 317: 309: 307: 305: 301: 293: 288: 283: 282: 278: 275: 273: 268: 267: 266: 264: 259: 258: 254: 248: 244: 242: 240: 232: 228: 225: 221: 217: 216:Song of Songs 213: 212: 211: 205: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 181: 177: 173: 172: 171: 170: 163: 159: 157: 153: 151: 147: 145: 142: 141: 140: 139: 138: 137: 130: 126: 122: 121: 120: 119: 111: 106: 105: 104: 103: 102: 101: 95: 92: 87: 86: 85: 84: 80: 76: 72: 67: 66: 65: 63: 59: 51: 50:from the pump 48: 47: 43: 41: 37: 35: 29: 28: 19: 2270: 2246: 2230: 2223: 2197:Chaim Laskov 2189:David Elazar 2168: 2162: 2154: 2151: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2121:mailing list 2110: 2088: 2084: 2076: 2074: 2059: 2040: 2005: 1989: 1975: 1952: 1939:mailing list 1928: 1909: 1870: 1855: 1851: 1848: 1836: 1828: 1811: 1808: 1747:mailing list 1736: 1685: 1604:common sense 1573: 1564: 1535: 1515: 1489: 1483: 1469: 1424: 1403: 1386: 1362: 1332: 1315: 1310: 1301: 1285: 1272: 1268: 1256: 1241: 1230: 1220: 1207: 1183: 1179: 1171: 1167: 1165: 1154: 1148: 1147: 1136: 1125: 1123: 1100: 1088: 1080: 1075:or into the 1068: 1054: 1042: 968: 965: 945: 934: 876: 861: 843: 840: 817: 807: 796: 778: 770: 760: 739: 721: 710: 685: 680: 678: 659: 649: 639: 633: 624: 615: 607: 594: 578: 558: 549:Michael Snow 545: 529: 524: 510: 457: 441: 410: 400: 388: 382: 373: 364: 349: 328: 313: 297: 269: 260: 255: 252: 236: 209: 160: 154: 148: 143: 128: 124: 54: 49: 39: 30: 25: 2177:Dan Shomron 2083:, but he's 2081:arbitration 1978:Snowspinner 1881:Snowspinner 1612:4.233.14.15 1576:User:NetBot 1546:negotiation 1437:has done a 1365:fr:Calendes 818:Hmm, maybe 722:Please see 660:Other notes 559:Please see 411:Other notes 224:Book of Job 162:Foundation. 2254:Rick Block 2181:Moshe Levi 2050:Silverback 1862:Neutrality 1565:instead of 1243:over there 1093:WikiTravel 1091:, such as 1033:Babenbergs 679:See these 123:This is a 2250:this list 2220:Thank you 2193:Tzvi Tzur 2125:Carbonite 2056:Netoholic 2002:Templates 1972:Netoholic 1900:Netoholic 1849:Hi Itai, 1809:Hi Itai, 1791:Netoholic 1562:edit wars 1538:consensus 1531:templates 1494:Netoholic 1450:consensus 1389:Netoholic 1383:Questions 1294:Netoholic 1278:Netoholic 1261:Netoholic 1234:Netoholic 1223:Netoholic 1185:talk page 1055:Hi, I've 1037:Habsburgs 966:Hi Itai, 894:User:Itai 890:Archdukes 582:Netoholic 534:article. 44:Man pages 2276:Lectonar 1996:Maurreen 1949:trumpets 1523:User:Wik 1439:redirect 1414:Maurreen 1406:Maurreen 1350:An Liúdr 1170:" with " 1155:Option 2 1137:Option 1 1097:top 1000 1081:CC-by-sa 1073:Licenses 1069:CC-by-sa 1009:Habsburg 844:Bohemian 597:Mateo SA 567:please. 496:Status: 150:manual). 132:license: 2119:or the 1937:or the 1776:f&t 1745:or the 1718:f&t 1667:f&t 1636:f&t 1525:'s and 1510:f&t 1478:f&t 1470:his way 1359:Kalends 1345:OLLISON 1211:olivier 1194:comment 1190:Ram-Man 1101:minimum 1045:Martg76 987:Moravia 971:my page 929:Martg76 914:Martg76 872:Martg76 836:Martg76 803:Martg76 668:prophet 652:: Done 616:Article 482:Frohnau 365:Article 27:Archive 2089:diktat 2077:banned 2030:(talk) 2019:(talk) 1992:WP:RFC 1910:per se 1592:RfAr's 1590:, and 1554:policy 1466:NetBot 1373:Jmabel 1273:should 855:.) -- 781:WP:CFD 650:Status 429:Jmabel 422:Jmabel 405:Jmabel 401:Status 331:Jmabel 231:Neviim 218:("aka 176:Debian 94:(talk) 71:rlogin 58:rlogin 2093:Xiong 2085:still 2062:Xiong 1966:Curps 1588:RfM's 1584:RfC's 1569:owner 1550:troll 1329:Block 1316:Verse 1311:Blank 1198:talk) 1017:Tyrol 654:Mpolo 513:Mpolo 498:Mpolo 16:< 2259:talk 2211:IZAK 2201:IZAK 2129:Talk 2101:talk 2070:talk 2027:Noel 2016:Noel 1943:Geni 1772:Itai 1760:Geni 1751:Geni 1714:Itai 1686:also 1663:Itai 1632:Itai 1606:and 1506:Itai 1474:Itai 1427:edit 1377:Talk 1353:amán 1252:Talk 1248:Phil 1176:GFDL 1085:GFDL 991:Samo 956:Itai 938:john 880:john 857:Itai 828:Samo 810:john 785:Itai 774:Itai 763:john 755:Itai 743:john 728:IZAK 712:IZAK 701:and 697:and 693:and 689:and 644:Itai 610:done 601:talk 569:IZAK 536:IZAK 505:Itai 491:Itai 464:IZAK 458:See 448:IZAK 442:See 418:Life 393:Itai 350:See 346:Vote 339:Itai 304:IZAK 287:Itai 277:IZAK 263:IZAK 245:Re; 239:IZAK 195:Itai 156:one. 110:Itai 79:Talk 62:Itai 34:Itai 2169:six 2139:Hi 1860:by 1600:RfC 1596:RfA 1578:at 1490:you 1443:TfD 1429:to 1367:on 1341:OHN 1015:or 681:six 575:RFC 532:Jew 129:all 125:bad 2127:| 2123:. 1871:- 1868:. 1854:a 1837:- 1586:, 1456:. 1375:| 1337:. 1250:| 1196:| 1149:OR 642:: 627:: 618:: 599:| 547:-- 391:: 376:: 367:: 77:| 2261:) 2257:( 1941:. 1903:@ 1813:( 1794:@ 1774:( 1749:. 1716:( 1665:( 1634:( 1508:( 1497:@ 1476:( 1392:@ 1348:( 1343:C 1339:J 1322:∅ 1297:@ 1281:@ 1264:@ 1226:@ 1192:( 941:k 883:k 813:k 766:k 746:k 585:@ 325:. 226:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index