1556:) 02:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC) Jytdog, I am not promoting anything but ideas and research that expand or clarify the Wiki information! I have done extensive research in each of the topics based on reliable sources. The benefit to Wiki is the analysis and organization of the material which would aid anyone else thinking about the same issues. My specific comments. 1, How does inserting the Scott article promote me? It is relevant and should remain. 2, I used Talk page prior to making any changes, left proposal for a week. 3. Note support for first change: The
391:
131:
1585:
229:
954:. Retrieved 1 May 2011. 46. ^ "Astronomers count the stars". BBC News. July 22, 2003. Retrieved 2006-07-18. 47. ^ "trillions-of-earths-could-be-orbiting-300-sextillion-stars" 48. ^ van Dokkum, Pieter G.; Charlie Conroy (2010). "A substantial population of low-mass stars in luminous elliptical galaxies". Nature 468 (7326): 940–942. arXiv:1009.5992. Bibcode:2010Natur.468..940V. doi:10.1038/nature09578.
588:
516:
291:
177:
1190:
1521:
1080:
737:
1156:, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
1003:
See ref. " I'm not sure what you mean by "visible and observable volumes". Surely those are the same? And it isn't duplication if you are trying to determine a separate result" This is exactly my point, the original uses both which is unnecessary since they are so close. I use the
Knowledge comoving
1595:
case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please
946:
A2. All updated sources were in the revision:" 43. ^Paul Davies , The
Goldilocks Enigma (First Mariner books, New York, 2006), pp. 43. 44. ^ Michio Kaku, Parallel Worlds (Anchor Books, New York,2006), pp.385. 45. ^ Bernard F. Schutz (2003). Gravity from the ground up. Cambridge University Press. pp.
896:
A3: First of all, a factor of two is not a very large difference in astronomical terms. Secondly, it depends how you define "average" (obviously, the "average mass" of a star listed in the article is a solar mass, and the Sun is middle-sized, even if it is relatively rare in stellar terms). Finally,
1049:
You want to radically redraft an already established article on a very important topic. So yes, my job right now is to slow you down. These things take time. I would prefer it if I was not currently the only one dealing with this, because I'm not interested in being "the Jerk". So I think I'm going
1012:
Although the Steady-state theory is false, the equation for mass is not. See my ref. In summary, I think my revision is much improved over the current and hope you agree. I can easily remove the rhetorical questions if they are not appropriate. Again, thanks for the feedback. Jim
Johnson 15:10, 6
1228:
and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the
597:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
525:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
975:. 54. ^ Fukugita, Masataka, Peebles, P. J. E., "The Cosmic Energy Inventory", Astro Physics Review 18 Aug 2004. 55. ^ Helge Kragh (1999-02-22). Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton University Press. p. 212, Chapter 5.
1621:
before opening your request for comment. If you need assistance in this or would like it written by a third party, let me know. The key is to ensure you ask the question in a way that does not favor either side so that you get impartial comments. Thanks! --
868:
3. The
Stellar density section uses an obscure reference on density rather than the NASA recent references. It does not correct for the Hubble distance (comoving radius). It also uses the wrong mass for an average star and outdated values (WAMP rather than
806:
I reverted your additions to the
Observable universe article, because the information was not presented in an encyclopedic manner. Perhaps, if you listed your facts, sources and issues with the article as it stands, I can incorporate them for you.
1109:
766:
1115:
772:
1041:
The eight added were: 1 from Astro-physics journal, 2 books from
Physicist (one, Paul Davies, is used in the previous section!), 2 NASA Releases which are as reliable as anything, 1 arXiv article, and 2 from my recent book.
1204:, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
906:
B2: Again, provide a source and it can be included. I'm not sure what you mean by "visible and observable volumes". Surely those are the same? And it isn't duplication if you are trying to determine a separate
1122:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
779:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
834:
1. In method 1, the two methods are calculating mass which is the same objective as the Mass section. Thus is redundant and confusing. Once mass is estimated the number of atoms is straightforward.
934:
I appreciate your detail review of my proposal. I am new to the process and format of updating
Knowledge. I know we can find a mutually agreeable improved revision. Address your specific comments:
991:
B1." Why? It is raising important caveats that the mass of the universe should include its energy, and that energy is involved in the curvature of spacetime. Seems pretty straightforward to me."
903:
B1: Why? It is raising important caveats that the mass of the universe should include its energy, and that energy is involved in the curvature of spacetime. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
1451:
1393:
1388:
has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Multiverse edits deleted". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.
961:. 49. ^ "How many stars?" 50. ^ NASA, Hubble News Release STSci - 2004-7. 51. ^ James R Johnson, Comprehending the Cosmos, a Macro view of the Universe, 2nd Edition, April 2013, pp. 36,
1504:
Thanks for responding. You recommend a logical approach. I previously missed
Someguy1221's response on the Notice board but have now responded.Jim Johnson 15:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1576:
I summary, I carefully thought about each addition and think each adds value as a reference. Please defend your deletions. Jim
Johnson Jim Johnson 12:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
613:
541:
1008:
B4. " Since the steady-state theory is debunked anyway, does it really matter if it doesn't use up to date figures? Personally I don't think it needs to be in the article "
26:
913:
B4: Since the steady-state theory is debunked anyway, does it really matter if it doesn't use up to date figures? Personally I don't think it needs to be in the article.
1392:
is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the
1266:
is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the
1262:
has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "test". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.
696:, where work usually goes on Knowledge articles (it will be easier to maintain attribution as well, if you post it there) . At the very start of the page, please add:
968:. 52. ^ NASA, Hubble News Release STSci - 20012-37. 53. ^ James R Johnson, Comprehending the Cosmos, a Macro view of the Universe, 2nd Edition, April 2013, pp. 34,
208:
942:
The point is having a focused objective for the first section - an estimate of the number of atoms. Why try to verify the amount of mass in two sections?
665:
I prefer to keep
Knowledge-related communications "on-Wiki". We do not accept article submissions by e-mail. I suggest that you ask for help either at
1592:
1635:
Please look at Multiverse Talk page to see if it is correct. If not could you correct. Thanks,Jim Johnson Jim Johnson 19:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
1160:
of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
327:
1046:
If you are not going to acknowledge my logic and give this a chance , can you refer this to another editor? Jim Johnson 21:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1447:
1401:
1321:
1275:
1201:
1179:
1325:
1267:
951:
1565:
1529:
1397:
1271:
1225:
1197:
1183:
1153:
1141:
1088:
792:
745:
674:
603:
531:
36:
1540:" are against Knowledge policy and not permitted; Knowledge articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
1057:
1023:
920:
814:
401:
60:
1408:
Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 28 November 2016.
1282:
Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 28 November 2016.
885:
First I should say, please forgive any obvious misapprehensions. I am not a cosmologist or even a scientist. With that out of the way:
459:
423:
213:
1233:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request
979:
693:
410:
1443:
1317:
1114:
1108:
771:
765:
716:
1037:
Are you trying to help or be an obstacle? I reused 6 of the original references although 2 were "news" and I debated using them.
1537:
1533:
1209:
437:
323:
301:
1561:
1454:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the
1328:, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the
972:
965:
378:
318:
1494:
1455:
1423:
1385:
1368:
1329:
1297:
1259:
851:
1. Introduction is confusing because of mass energy reference and "space time curvature' which does not belong in section.
566:
405:
261:
1463:
1337:
938:
A1. "I do not see the doubling up as redundant; rather it shows the same conclusion through multiple lines of evidence."
878:
The revised version, corrects all these inconsistencies. Appreciate your thoughts. Jim Johnson 02:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
270:
243:
164:
149:
451:
339:
248:
1016:
Your sources are primarily popular science books and news releases. On Knowledge, scientific articles are preferred.
890:
A1. I do not see the doubling up as redundant; rather it shows the same conclusion through multiple lines of evidence
1560:
seems a little premature. ISPCJournals does not seem to be on Beall's List. The paper didn't look half bad and even
982:. 56. Valevx,Dimitar, Estimation of the total mass and energy of the universe, arXiv:1004.1035v 7 Apr 2010, pp. 4."
837:
2. In method 1, the value of the Hubble constant and the values ordinary matter are outdated (WAMP rather than ESA).
1564:
I hadn't known of before. Is it right that the citation was so quickly removed? It is not obviously pseudoscience.
1230:
433:
356:
305:
265:
187:
168:
872:
4. The Steady-state section uses an outdated value for Hubble constant and does not correct for a comoving radius.
374:
335:
1569:
1478:
1459:
1352:
1333:
788:
670:
361:
314:
857:
The reference on the fraction of stars is outdated, the best estimate in the Cosmic Energy Inventory article.
1462:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see
1336:. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see
1059:
1025:
922:
816:
343:
310:
278:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
56:
48:
44:
1545:
1419:
1293:
274:
199:
158:
1643:
is going to correct and propose one so I shall wait and see if further assistance is needed on that. --
1131:
910:
B3: again these can be fixed using the appropriate sources, rather than completely rewriting the section
419:
414:
141:
1169:
1161:
1092:
749:
720:
643:
382:
348:
1509:
390:
1470:
1389:
1344:
1263:
1084:
784:
741:
442:
369:
256:
239:
204:
191:
1052:
1018:
915:
809:
712:
after which, you can describe what you'd like done with the preceding section of posted material.
563:
352:
252:
195:
154:
1229:
speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
1450:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the
1324:. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the
130:
1513:
1490:
1415:
1364:
1289:
1242:
976:
969:
962:
955:
948:
682:
497:
429:
1553:
1200:, requesting that it be deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under two or more of the
1157:
1127:
1087:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
843:
4. In method 2, the reference to number of galaxies is outdated by NASA's current estimates.
744:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
52:
1165:
1149:
631:
617:
545:
455:
1411:
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
1285:
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
1541:
1234:
446:
365:
228:
1106:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
763:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
1618:
1213:
666:
594:
580:
560:
522:
508:
145:
1584:
1446:
concerning Multiverse edits deleted, to which you were listed as a party, has been
1238:
985:
A3. A factor of two may not be too significant but it is wrong! See reference list.
678:
493:
31:
1406:
please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.
1280:
please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.
1640:
1549:
1525:
854:
2. Critical density section is based on outdated values (WAMP rather than ESA).
290:
587:
515:
1651:
1630:
1604:
1573:
1484:
1427:
1358:
1301:
1246:
1173:
1135:
1065:
1031:
928:
897:
the information is sourced. You need to provide your own source to counter it.
822:
796:
724:
686:
652:
570:
501:
176:
1645:
1624:
1598:
860:
Using both the visible and observable volumes is confusing and not relevant.
602:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
530:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
958:
840:
3. In method 2, the mass of an average star is wrong, two times too large.
609:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
537:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1591:
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current
1520:
1079:
736:
1220:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
995:
Although true, it is in another Knowledge section -Energy and Mass.
1100:
757:
1320:
concerning test, to which you were listed as a party, has been
480:
863:
The section uses results from method 1 which is duplication.
831:
A. Matter Content has the following issues/inconsistencies:
1583:
1188:
586:
514:
222:
on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem
1532:
have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
704:
before you paste your material. And after your paste, add
1083:
Hello and welcome to Knowledge. When you add content to
740:
Hello and welcome to Knowledge. When you add content to
612:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
540:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
1557:
622:
550:
117:
1050:
to move this conversation to the article's talk page.
1198:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
1184:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
1154:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
1142:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
999:
B2. "Again, provide a source and it can be included".
604:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
532:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Mass of Universe
558:Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge! --
1617:I have closed the dispute. Please ensure to read
1212:, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See
848:B. Mass has the following issues/inconsistencies:
124:
1528:. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
1214:section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion
630:Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge!
1639:This was not correct. However it looks like
1558:removal of the James R Johnson paper citation
893:A2: Provide a source, and it can be reworked.
8:
1548:to learn more about Knowledge. Thank you.
116:
1095:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
900:A4: Again, if you have a source, list it.
752:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
593:Thank you for your recent submission to
521:Thank you for your recent submission to
1103:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
760:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
205:Where to ask questions or make comments
1562:contained a reference to another paper
675:talk page of the astronomy WikiProject
1152:. I just wanted to let you know that
7:
1089:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Astronomy
827:Why change Matter Content and Mass?
746:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Astronomy
1378:Formal mediation has been requested
1252:Formal mediation has been requested
1231:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
35:and I would like to thank you for
14:
694:talk:Observable universe/workpage
1519:
1164:. Thank you for your attention.
1118:) located above the edit window.
1113:
1107:
1078:
1004:radius for observable universe.
775:) located above the edit window.
770:
764:
735:
389:
289:
227:
175:
129:
1210:Knowledge:Articles for creation
1208:It is a rejected submission at
669:or on the article's talk page (
209:Request administrator attention
1605:05:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
1593:Dispute Resolution Noticeboard
1574:03:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
1436:Request for mediation rejected
1310:Request for mediation rejected
1:
1485:03:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1469:For the Mediation Committee,
1428:02:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1359:02:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1343:For the Mediation Committee,
1302:00:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
328:Biographies of living persons
214:Knowledge: The Missing Manual
159:The five pillars of Knowledge
1580:Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
1464:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
1458:of the Committee, or to the
1444:request for formal mediation
1426:of the Mediation Committee.
1338:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
1332:of the Committee, or to the
1318:request for formal mediation
1300:of the Mediation Committee.
1202:criteria for speedy deletion
1652:04:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
1631:02:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
1247:18:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
1174:13:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
618:real time chat with helpers
546:real time chat with helpers
1668:
1536:and using Knowledge as a "
502:20:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
1530:your recent contributions
1497:the Mediation Committee.)
1402:guide to formal mediation
1371:the Mediation Committee.)
1276:guide to formal mediation
1196:A tag has been placed on
797:02:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
725:00:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
687:20:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
487:to reply to this message.
1136:00:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
1066:05:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
1032:21:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
929:07:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
823:20:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
671:Talk:Observable universe
653:19:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
1398:formal mediation policy
1272:formal mediation policy
571:18:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
411:Pages needing attention
406:Help develop an article
295:Policies and Guidelines
150:Article creation wizard
1588:
1452:mediation request page
1326:mediation request page
1222:contest the nomination
1193:
591:
519:
1587:
1544:. Take a look at the
1414:Message delivered by
1288:Message delivered by
1192:
692:Yyou can paste it to
595:Articles for Creation
590:
581:Articles for creation
523:Articles for Creation
518:
509:Articles for creation
324:What Knowledge is not
302:Neutral point of view
27:welcome to Knowledge!
1091:, please be sure to
748:, please be sure to
623:reviewer's talk page
551:reviewer's talk page
424:Translating articles
379:Conflict of interest
319:No original research
1596:add your input. --
1542:neutral perspective
1386:Mediation Committee
1260:Mediation Committee
802:Observable universe
579:Your submission at
507:Your submission at
262:No personal attacks
1589:
1194:
700:{{workpage}} ----
592:
520:
490:
420:Join a WikiProject
402:Be bold in editing
244:Resolving disputes
155:Knowledge Tutorial
123:
37:your contributions
1498:
1430:
1372:
1304:
1226:visiting the page
1126:Thank you. ------
952:978-0-521-45506-0
567:(COI Declaration)
476:
472:
471:
340:Three-revert rule
249:Assume good faith
122:
120:
41:
1659:
1648:
1627:
1601:
1523:
1488:
1481:
1475:
1413:
1362:
1355:
1349:
1287:
1191:
1117:
1111:
1082:
1062:
1055:
1028:
1021:
1013:July 2013 (UTC)
925:
918:
819:
812:
774:
768:
739:
649:
641:
640:
625:
569:
553:
485:
452:Useful templates
393:
357:Image use policy
306:Reliable sources
293:
266:No legal threats
231:
188:Community Portal
179:
133:
125:
42:
34:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1646:
1625:
1612:
1599:
1582:
1517:
1501:
1500:
1479:
1471:
1467:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1409:
1380:
1375:
1374:
1353:
1345:
1341:
1312:
1307:
1306:
1283:
1254:
1189:
1187:
1180:Speedy deletion
1146:
1093:sign your posts
1076:
1060:
1053:
1026:
1019:
923:
916:
817:
810:
804:
750:sign your posts
733:
709:
701:
663:
658:
657:
645:
636:
632:
621:
584:
576:
575:
559:
549:
512:
491:
479:
464:
397:
387:
375:Deletion policy
336:Manual of Style
297:
283:
240:Build consensus
235:
225:
183:
173:
169:upload an image
137:
135:Getting Started
40:
30:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1665:
1663:
1655:
1654:
1611:
1608:
1581:
1578:
1566:96.237.136.210
1516:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1489:(Delivered by
1487:
1473:TransporterMan
1441:
1440:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1412:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1363:(Delivered by
1361:
1347:TransporterMan
1315:
1314:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1286:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1218:
1217:
1186:
1182:nomination of
1177:
1148:Hi there, I'm
1145:
1139:
1120:
1119:
1104:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1039:
1038:
1010:
1009:
1001:
1000:
993:
992:
989:
986:
983:
940:
939:
932:
931:
911:
908:
904:
901:
898:
894:
891:
887:
886:
881:
876:
875:
874:
873:
870:
866:
865:
864:
861:
858:
852:
846:
845:
844:
841:
838:
835:
803:
800:
785:StringTheory11
777:
776:
761:
732:
729:
728:
727:
713:
707:
706:
705:
699:
698:
697:
662:
659:
656:
655:
627:
626:
610:
607:
599:
598:
585:
583:
577:
574:
573:
555:
554:
538:
535:
527:
526:
513:
511:
505:
475:
470:
469:
466:
465:
463:
462:
449:
440:
426:
417:
408:
398:
388:
386:
385:
372:
362:External links
359:
346:
332:
331:
330:
321:
315:Citing sources
308:
298:
288:
286:
284:
282:
281:
268:
259:
246:
236:
233:The Commmunity
226:
224:
223:
216:
211:
202:
184:
174:
172:
171:
161:
152:
138:
128:
23:Jimjohnson2222
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1664:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1620:
1615:
1609:
1607:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1594:
1586:
1579:
1577:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1522:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1474:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1435:
1431:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1360:
1356:
1350:
1348:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1309:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1251:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1223:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1203:
1199:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:WP:REFUND/G13
1159:
1155:
1151:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1124:
1116:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1073:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1056:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1024:
1022:
1014:
1007:
1006:
1005:
998:
997:
996:
990:
987:
984:
981:
980:0-691-00546-X
978:
974:
971:
967:
964:
960:
957:
953:
950:
945:
944:
943:
937:
936:
935:
930:
927:
926:
921:
919:
912:
909:
905:
902:
899:
895:
892:
889:
888:
884:
883:
882:
879:
871:
867:
862:
859:
856:
855:
853:
850:
849:
847:
842:
839:
836:
833:
832:
830:
829:
828:
825:
824:
821:
820:
815:
813:
801:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
773:
767:
762:
759:
755:
754:
753:
751:
747:
743:
738:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
711:
710:
703:
702:
695:
691:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:), or at the
672:
668:
667:the Tea House
660:
654:
651:
648:
642:
639:
635:
629:
628:
624:
619:
615:
611:
608:
605:
601:
600:
596:
589:
582:
578:
572:
568:
565:
562:
557:
556:
552:
547:
543:
539:
536:
533:
529:
528:
524:
517:
510:
506:
504:
503:
499:
495:
489:
486:
484:
483:
474:
468:
467:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
441:
439:
435:
431:
428:Cleaning up:
427:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
409:
407:
403:
400:
399:
396:
392:
384:
380:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
344:Sock puppetry
341:
337:
334:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
311:Verifiability
309:
307:
303:
300:
299:
296:
292:
287:
285:
280:
279:Mailing lists
276:
272:
269:
267:
263:
260:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
238:
237:
234:
230:
221:
217:
215:
212:
210:
206:
203:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
185:
182:
178:
170:
166:
162:
160:
156:
153:
151:
147:
143:
140:
139:
136:
132:
127:
126:
121:
119:
115:embassy page
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
38:
33:
28:
24:
16:
1644:
1634:
1623:
1616:
1613:
1597:
1590:
1546:welcome page
1518:
1495:on behalf of
1491:MediationBot
1472:
1468:
1460:mailing list
1416:MediationBot
1410:
1405:
1394:request page
1369:on behalf of
1365:MediationBot
1346:
1342:
1334:mailing list
1290:MediationBot
1284:
1279:
1268:request page
1221:
1219:
1195:
1158:Userfication
1147:
1125:
1121:
1077:
1051:
1040:
1017:
1015:
1011:
1002:
994:
988:A4. See ref.
941:
933:
914:
880:
877:
826:
808:
805:
782:
778:
734:
664:
646:
637:
633:
620:, or on the
548:, or on the
492:
488:
481:
477:
473:
460:User scripts
395:Things to do
394:
294:
275:IRC channels
232:
219:
200:Village Pump
181:Getting help
180:
134:
43:
22:
1534:Advertising
1524:Hello, I'm
1128:Steve Quinn
783:Thank you.
415:Peer review
165:edit a page
142:First steps
1610:Closed DRN
1514:WP:REFSPAM
1400:, and the
1274:, and the
1166:HasteurBot
1150:HasteurBot
1085:talk pages
973:1477649697
966:1477649697
742:talk pages
717:65.94.79.6
447:Talk pages
443:User pages
383:Notability
349:Copyrights
220:{{helpme}}
81:Nederlands
1390:Mediation
1264:Mediation
1099:Add four
1074:July 2013
756:Add four
731:June 2013
614:help desk
542:help desk
438:Vandalism
370:Vandalism
257:Etiquette
192:Help desk
89:Português
45:Български
1456:Chairman
1448:declined
1330:Chairman
1322:declined
959:21124316
561:Eclipsed
353:Fair use
271:Signpost
253:Civility
196:Teahouse
163:How to:
69:Lietuvių
65:Italiano
61:Français
1614:Hello!
1538:soapbox
1510:WP:PROO
1239:Hasteur
1144:concern
1054:Serendi
1020:Serendi
917:Serendi
907:result.
811:Serendi
679:ukexpat
494:ukexpat
430:General
101:Svenska
93:Русский
57:Español
53:English
49:Deutsch
32:Ukexpat
17:Welcome
1641:Jytdog
1619:WP:RFC
1550:Jytdog
1526:Jytdog
1424:behalf
1396:, the
1298:behalf
1270:, the
1101:tildes
947:361–.
758:tildes
661:E-mail
634:France
616:, via
564:(talk)
544:, via
478:Click
218:Place
111:| The
105:Türkçe
85:Polski
77:Magyar
21:Hello
1422:) on
1296:) on
869:ESA).
708:----
456:Tools
97:Suomi
29:I am
1647:Dane
1626:Dane
1600:Dane
1570:talk
1554:talk
1480:TALK
1442:The
1420:talk
1384:The
1354:TALK
1316:The
1294:talk
1258:The
1243:talk
1235:here
1170:talk
1132:talk
977:ISBN
970:ISBN
963:ISBN
956:PMID
949:ISBN
721:talk
683:talk
677:. --
647:talk
638:3470
498:talk
482:here
434:Spam
366:Spam
118:edit
113:main
109:简体中文
95:|
25:and
1237:.
1224:by
1112:or
1061:ous
1027:ous
924:ous
818:ous
769:or
715:--
198:•
146:FAQ
107:|
103:|
73:한국어
71:|
67:|
59:|
55:|
51:|
1572:)
1512:,
1493:,
1483:)
1466:.
1404:,
1367:,
1357:)
1340:.
1278:,
1245:)
1216:.)
1172:)
1134:)
795:)
791:•
723:)
685:)
500:)
458:•
454:•
445:•
436:•
432:•
422:•
413:•
404:•
381:•
377:•
368:•
364:•
355:•
351:•
342:•
338:•
326:•
317:•
313:•
304:•
277:•
273:•
264:•
255:•
251:•
242:•
207:•
194:•
190:•
167:•
157:•
148:•
144:•
99:|
91:|
87:|
83:|
79:|
75:|
63:|
47:|
1568:(
1552:(
1477:(
1418:(
1351:(
1292:(
1241:(
1168:(
1130:(
793:c
789:t
787:(
719:(
681:(
650:)
644:(
606:.
534:.
496:(
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
