User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 16

3306: 1539: 3325: 4057:

clinics, etc. The components of each project addressed the immediate needs of women, men & children which included starting fisheries, growing crops, teaching people how to raise poultry. He met with the impoverished individuals face to face & traveled to Washington, D.C., New York City, Rome, Italy & other destinations in order to secure the funding to provide the basic necessities that most people take for granted such as water, electricity & roads.

4005: 1659: 3345: 1575: 38: 4292:

accused" to defend himself. If you disagree with the man or his views that is your right, but he should have an opportunity to defend himself against slander on his own Wiki page. If you continue to remove my edit I will report you for vandalism, but I would be very interested in your rationale for removing my posts considering you appear to be active and enthusiastic about Wikepedia as a medium for the exchange of ideas. (

3513: 2309: 1596: 3381: 4382: 4191: 2571: 2378: 1061: 990: 3404: 2491: 3002: 3694: 1436: 1560: 3425: 1638: 3608: 1293: 121:. I find that a bold conclusion that he is '(semi-)retired', he may just not have much time, be on holiday, do his work elsewhere on Knowledge (XXG) (other wikis, or even behind the scenes). I don't even think that not editing outside of his user-talk (and in the last 100 edits there are 4 mainspace edits, and edits to talkpages) make someone (semi-)retired either. Thanks! -- 1617: 945: 1179:, and I was under the impression that if you wanted to nominate two or more pages for deletion you had to create a separate AFD for each of them. However, it seems that, in fact, you can nominate 5 articles for deletion in only one AFD discussion. Now that I know this, I will be more careful looking at articles nominated for deletion in the future. 3111: 1689:; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Knowledge (XXG)'s most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points. 273:. However, it seems as though dw.de is in fact a reliable source (at least in Germany). Accordingly, I have removed the proposed deletion tag, as some of the article's sources are reliable. However, we are now left with an even bigger problem-- it seems that a significant part of this (admittedly very short) article was a 4056:

Faysal Ruwayha is a graduate of International College & was a Project Controller for the United nations for 23 years, in charge of improving all aspects of rural living standards in North & South Yemen, Lebanon, Syria & Jordan. Some projects included the financing of rural roads, schools,

4145:

make sense if the "Background" section contained more than one sentence about Salby's actual research, appended to a huge chunk of science-y stuff which covers pretty much every possible atmospheric science-related topic there is. If you are sure that a background section is needed here, you should,

2428:

He was not born in 1975...he was born in late 1969. He was three years ahead of me at FSU, and I'm 41. We are three years apart in age. He's a smart guy, but he's not Dougie Howser, M.D. or Sheldon Cooper. He received his BS in 1991. I alerted him to the faulty info on that website...hopefully

1681:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We

512:

Very thanking for your very speedy reply, well i didn't removed the citation message because i had thought citation message should be removed by an editor, admin, etc. but not by an autoconfirmed user(like me), since the citation message might be useful for removing any error, or fault in the page.

3299:

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it

4322:

I see you changed the article title and concentrated on Cedillo, the only problem with this is the other 2 cases listed under decisions seem to appear from nowhere. This needs to be rewritten to at least explain that the other 2 cases were part of 3 overall. I know where they came from but to the

4291:

You have repeatedly removed my edit to the page on Kary Mullis, in which I provide links for his rebuttal to comments on his Wiki page. Why don't you want readers to have access to his side of the story and make up their own minds? This seems un-scientific and downright denialist to prevent "the

4271:

Alright, I guess that makes sense, but only if your definition of "involved" is much broader than mine--I consider "involved" to mean that the user either created the article or wrote a significant chunk of its content. In other words, just tagging a page doesn't indicate that you care about its

3713:

Non-notable academic/scientis. A7 was rejected but with no notability argument. There appears to be below threshold without any peer reviewed articles cited or noteworthy contributions. Article focuses on the negative aspect that he was fired because of failing to perform academic duties. It

3659:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

3580:

Jinkinson, I have no problem with eds adding scientists along with RSs per conventional BRD protocol, ie waiting for the R to happen before initiating talk. I also don't see harm in D's personal request to talk first nor his alerting you about DS. But In my view combining them in a single edit

2889:

Why this article is not of importance.. Its a public limited company in india and one of the leading firms in the country in the field of real estate. If its lacks of sources or reference.. please let me know. This article is under progress so please let me know after checking the article again.

1344:

2357:

I think you have done an excellent job and the Tim Ball article is ready to move to the main space. There is no point in waiting until it is perfect, because no article is ever perfect, and in main space many more people will be able to edit it and continue to improve it. Thanks for your work!

2058:

I am just starting out on Knowledge (XXG) and I wanted to add an artist to the collection. I'm trying to use other templates in order to make this page conform to other pages that are similar. Should I publish the primary page first and then create stubs that are linked back to the home page?

3581:

gives an impression that not honoring his personal pref re adding new nerds might be sanction able, which is not at all how I understand the DS system. in sum, we have had disagreements and I appreciate your attention to the process. as for D's request I don't care either way, personally.

3444:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for

3012: 3536:

Discretionary sanctions are intended to prevent further disruption to a topic which has already been significantly disrupted. In practical terms, this means that uninvolved administrators may impose sanctions for any conduct, within or relating to the topic, which fails to adhere to the

1333:. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 1550: 4125:

Hi, I certainly needed background overview to help explain what his work was about. Sometimes Knowledge (XXG) articles have a "___ for dummies" explanation and I was looking to emulate that spirit. Trying to summarize a complex field in a few paragraphs.

3557:. Before making any more edits to this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system as sanctions can be imposed without further warning. Please do not hesitate to contact me or any other editor if you have any questions. 3445:

collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

3148: 3128: 3103: 2085:. I really appreciate your approval. Unfortunately, I've spotted a typo in the company's name - it's 'Baring Asset Management' not 'Barings Asset Management'. Could you please correct it? There could be a tech issue with this as the relevant link 4408:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4217:

2597:

2404:

1087:

1016:

1903:

Mitch Feierstein has columns in two of the biggest newspapers in the UK, the Daily Mail and The Independent, and is a regular media commentator on shows like the Keiser Report. His book has been published by a major publisher, and translated

1529:

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the

3640:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 4091:

It may well be true that Ruwayha has done many helpful and altruistic things. However, this is not sufficient to justify having a Knowledge (XXG) article about him--for that you would need coverage in independent reliable sources (see

3894:

Thanks, Dr James confirmed your judgment of the two refs, tagging immediately above them with a primary source comment would have made that clear (if that worked). ... I didn't see a better tag to use when I looked at the templates.

494:

Well, if there is a citation for a statement in this article, as there clearly is here (in fact, there are 4), and no one else will remove the citation needed tag, you can just do so yourself. I have removed it for you here, though.

4162:

Well that's in process, as it will take some time to find experts who will help work through his dozens of papers, determine which are most cited/significant, then write it all up. I'm hoping that will happen, but who knows when.

3316:), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Knowledge (XXG). Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in 479:, a boar. So i had already inserted book sources, but the citation message is still not removed for a substantial time since. Though this is small thing, but you can fix this and mention if the sources put are not reliable. 1111:

Hi, that picture of me was actually taken this month, not in 2005. I changed the date on the picture to make it "float" to the bottom of my Flickr pictures so that no one could find it there ... So much for that!. Thanks,

809:

you might want to consider finding some sources that are not connected to CRMEP to develop the article, and bring it into conformity content-wise with the guidelines on how to organize articles at Wikiproject:Universities

716:

No problem at all. I was planning on doing it myself but he posted so much stuff in the review that it kind of intimidated me (also I have been busy IRL lately). Please, don't hesitate to fix the problems he identified.

3158: 3335:), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist 4412:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4221:

2601:

2408:

1091:

1020:

1013: 958: 1195:

I've seen upwards of 20 nominated in bulk, in cases where the reason for it is identical (generally, also the author and timeframe is also identical, but not always). It's not common, but it's not at all rare.

1583: 2594: 4475: 3954: 3221: 2827: 2667: 1998: 1982: 1784: 1768: 581: 3930: 2819: 2635: 881: 546: 427:

I'm afraid I had to speedy your subpage "Cowardly admins" as an attack page. Plus, it contained one user who hasn't been an admin in a long time (even though they did protect their userpage in 2008).

4467: 3946: 3210: 2835: 2651: 865: 4029: 3253: 2009: 1795: 668:

Good point. I myself wasn't sure either, and you can change the rationale. A1 is basically the one I use when it is clearly eligible for speedy deletion, but I'm not sure which template to use.

4459: 4451: 3938: 3922: 3245: 3237: 3229: 2843: 2811: 2659: 2643: 1990: 1974: 1776: 1760: 897: 873: 857: 573: 538: 1625: 1604: 701:

underway, and that the reviewer made a few comments. Any problems if I get to work on those comments? I'd like to have a GA under my wings and it was interesting to collaborate previously. --

3523: 3353: 3332: 1646: 2627: 889: 562: 1667: 847: 3356:), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include 4349: 3433: 1568: 656:

Hi. Not entirely sure if that should be an A1 or an A3 since it has plenty of context, just no good content. I would have marked that one except I wasn't sure what it should be :D

3448:

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

1692:

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

3565:

on the article talk page. It would be more productive to discuss them first but at least provide notice on talk and your reasons for adding them if you choose to edit first. --

2258:

Hi! I just reviewed the page Set Yourself Free that you created. Try to help keep it updated as more information is available, because this is a still-"trending" video. Thanks!

4405: 4347:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 3531: 3313: 1546: 303: 296: 3436:), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance 3389: 2909:

Hi, I hope I didn't come across as PITA; I wasn't comfy fixing it myself since I have not read the RS. The revision works just fine for me, grammar-wise. Thanks for fixing,

3412: 2401: 1946: 1913: 356:

Thanks, and sorry for not listing it there. I'm rather new to this copyvio tagging thing (outside of the CSD, anyway), so hopefully I won't make this mistake in the future.

3202: 2181: 554: 768:

No I cannot, because only administrators can view or restore deleted content, and as it states at the top of this page, I am not an administrator. You might want to go to

171: 4060:

I would like to state that the above info is very important as Mr. Ruwayha has helped the world greatly. Please let me know how this may be added under notable alumni.

3562: 2177: 2112:

and request it there. I am not an admin and therefore can't delete the redirect you want to move the page to, but you will be much more likely to get assistance there.

2770: 1084: 1391: 1924:) 07:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)o a range of languages. He's appeared at Parliamentary committees as an expert. Seems to me a valid candidate for a wikipedia entry. 174:

their are over 5 cryptocurrency-related articles up for deletion, I'm not sure if this is a problem, but since many lack notability it's becoming a problem. Best

3185: 3121: 3040: 3008: 3157:

has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the

3067: 4214: 2773:. Due to lack of discussion the article has now been relisted twice. If you have a chance could you please stop by and weigh in on the deletion debate. — 4394: 4253:

You prodded this in January. It's standard practice to inform editors who have been involved in an article when there's an AfD discussion for that article.

4203: 3845: 3077: 3063: 2736: 2726: 2583: 2390: 2165: 1256: 1073: 1002: 4496: 3975: 3274: 2864: 2688: 2132:

Many thanks for the tip. I had a feeling this was not going to be straight forward. I'll make a request on the page you mentioned above. Thanks again. Kat

2030: 1816: 918: 602: 453: 231:- unfortunately it has gone in under M instead of H - is it possible for me to correct this or will it correct itself eventually? Still quite new here... 2722: 250:

Hello Jinkinson! Could you please tell me in brief why you doubt on the sources of information for this article is unrelieable. Thank you in advance.

3758: 3597: 1499: 1282: 3324: 3269: 3835: 2205: 795: 449: 4354: 3879:

on Passive smoking seems unjustified, as I understand the MedRS requirements. Could you raise more specific concerns on the talk page please.

3831: 3542: 1246: 4079: 3841: 3073: 2732: 2161: 1252: 2316:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

2303: 2201: 1629: 4505: 3984: 3283: 3181: 3036: 2873: 2697: 1825: 3459: 1703: 1242: 146:

Sorry Jimbo. Yeah, this definitely wasn't my proudest moment on this site. I'll try to stay out of other people's userspace from now on.

772:

instead if you think this website was notable. Also, you should be prepared to add reliable sources to the article if it gets restored.

2154:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

1682:

apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

3362: 637: 3762: 3664:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 1503: 1349:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request 1330: 4485: 3964: 3263: 2853: 2677: 2464:

I'm in some communication with Marshall, yeah. By wikipedia's definition of the term, yes. I haven't run across that term before

2019: 1805: 1172: 997: 981: 949: 907: 591: 3645: 3550: 1532: 4104:

Also, you can't add him under notable alumni until you have demonstrated that he should have an article as per what I said above.

3367: 2928:

Hi, I would prefer you not mention me by name in edit summaries. Twice the last few days your edit summaries come across like "

1608: 104: 96: 91: 79: 74: 66: 2279: 200:

Hello Jinkinson! Could you please tell me in brief why you doubt on the sources of information for this article is unrelieable.

4501: 3980: 3857: 3452:. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on 3279: 3177: 3032: 2869: 2789: 2693: 2082: 1885: 1821: 1696:. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on 3838:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3617: 3398:

through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.

3070:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2729:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1302: 1249:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 330: 4343: 4014:

Thank you for quality articles on subjects as various as biogrophies of researchers, scientific journalsand music, including

2540:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2445: 2158:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3750: 3705: 3683: 1940: 1907: 1491: 1447: 1425: 4146:

in my opinion, whittle it down to stuff that actually pertains to Salby's research and leave out as much else as possible.

4100:

for more about how someone doing many generous things doesn't necessarily mean they should have a page on Knowledge (XXG).

3754: 3661: 3546: 2497: 1686: 1495: 1346: 1326: 4426: 3791:

Hello Jinkinson, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

277:

of one of the cited sources, and I have tagged it as such. In the future, please try to write things in your own words.

255: 205: 4491: 4398: 4207: 3970: 3554: 3449: 3317: 3145:

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

2859: 2683: 2587: 2394: 2025: 1811: 1693: 1077: 1006: 913: 597: 3472: 2173: 2067: 1716: 3624: 2155: 1309: 2108:

You're welcome. However, if you want to move the article to the new title (without the 's'), you will need to go to

1358: 3827: 3822:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3808: 3586: 3496: 3484: 3169: 3054:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3024: 2980: 2949: 2914: 2713:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2541: 2527: 2509: 1740: 1728: 1587: 1390:

You just beat me to removing the db tag from the userfied page. My reason for userfying is the close of the DRV at

1233:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

45: 2288: 326: 4075: 3416: 2313: 1929: 3538: 3453: 2550: 1697: 448:

I have now corrected the contradiction. I mixed up the date of her death (5/26) with that of the arrest (5/29).

442: 4430: 3394: 1579: 1407: 1354: 1171:

Sorry, I guess. It depends on how you define "correct," though--the link was clearly to an AFD for the article

539:

German chapter asks for "reworking" of Funds Dissemination Committee; should MP4 be allowed on Wikimedia sites?

956:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

4019: 3305: 2518: 2063: 1595: 1538: 1478: 1211: 1156: 1116: 1036: 251: 4067: 849:

Missing Links and Secret Histories: A Selection of Knowledge (XXG) Entries from Across the Known Multiverse

633: 212: 4535: 4523: 4168: 4131: 4071: 4040: 3792: 3785: 2490: 1925: 1394:. This clearly envisages that a new article could be acceptable, but I think you should check it out with 1097: 826: 814: 641: 381: 346: 236: 170:

Hey Jinkinson! I've been seeing a lot of cryptocurrency-related articles on Knowledge (XXG). According to

4293: 3766: 2812:

Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Knowledge (XXG) editor faces down legal challenge

2769:

An article that you either edited or previously proposed for deletion has been nominated for deletion at

1507: 3804: 3582: 3458:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from

3336: 3165: 3055: 3020: 2976: 2945: 2910: 2502: 2340: 2271: 2263: 1889: 1702:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from

1590:

and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.

1399: 136: 54: 17: 2537: 1443: 1429: 2385: 2369: 4558: 4362: 4328: 2469: 2434: 2299: 2292: 2039: 1849: 1671: 1515: 965: 927: 758: 754: 698: 687: 611: 311: 3823: 3719:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

2444:

Good call. I guess even major universities can make mistakes sometimes. Also, should I add you as a

1460:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1176: 1135: 274: 4306: 4278: 4242: 4152: 4110: 3861: 3468: 2965: 2785: 2763: 2714: 2607: 2454: 2414: 2323: 2118: 2081:

Hi Jinkinson, first of all a big thank you for your revision and acceptance of the new article for

1881: 1712: 1403: 1374: 1185: 778: 723: 674: 514: 501: 480: 413: 362: 283: 228: 187: 152: 4389: 4373: 3774: 3673: 3570: 3492: 3480: 2895: 2448:

on the talk page, since you seem to know him very well and be in regular communication with him?

2348: 1736: 1724: 1621: 1600: 1553:, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers: 1325:, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 1197: 1142: 1113: 1022: 706: 627:

Thanks for fixing that, I actually didn't know I did that. Maybe it was a friend, but whatever.

518: 484: 432: 4198: 4182: 4097: 4004: 3660:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

2109: 1345:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

4529: 4164: 4127: 4036: 3900: 3884: 3733: 3349: 3328: 3093: 2752: 2531: 2244: 2229: 1954: 1921: 1867: 1860: 1670:) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance 1642: 1474: 1272: 1093: 953: 822: 802: 377: 342: 232: 23: 3665: 3154: 1350: 750: 739: 164: 4422: 3737: 2259: 2251: 2137: 2098: 1663: 1455:

Non-notable publisher. Just being on Beall's list is not enough to make a publisher notable.

1415: 1395: 132: 118: 4093: 3800: 3720: 3641: 3637: 1461: 1322: 769: 753:

created by me was deleted. Can you kindly provide me the text for my own record? Thanks! --

338: 334: 306:

since you last commented on it. You are invited to return to comment on the new proposals.

270: 4554: 4358: 4324: 3429: 3300:

also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

2522:, an El Salvadorian fisherman, claimed in February 2014 to have survived 13 months at sea? 2465: 2430: 2035: 1845: 1511: 923: 607: 307: 821:

Oops, that was an error. UGH. Bad day over here. that was meant for the article writer.--

266: 4562: 4539: 4509: 4434: 4366: 4332: 4311: 4283: 4262: 4247: 4231: 4172: 4157: 4135: 4115: 4083: 4044: 3988: 3904: 3888: 3865: 3812: 3797:

the named events are a sufficient claim of importance to deny A7 (but probably not AfD).

3778: 3677: 3590: 3574: 3500: 3287: 3173: 3097: 3028: 2984: 2970: 2953: 2918: 2899: 2877: 2795: 2756: 2701: 2611: 2473: 2459: 2438: 2418: 2362: 2352: 2329: 2233: 2141: 2123: 2102: 2071: 2043: 1958: 1933: 1893: 1853: 1829: 1744: 1519: 1419: 1379: 1362: 1321:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1276: 1220: 1190: 1165: 1119: 1101: 1045: 974: 931: 830: 783: 762: 728: 710: 679: 662: 645: 615: 522: 506: 488: 457: 435: 417: 385: 367: 350: 315: 288: 259: 240: 216: 194: 157: 140: 125: 4301: 4273: 4237: 4147: 4105: 3527: 3464: 3059: 2960: 2775: 2603: 2449: 2410: 2359: 2318: 2113: 2010:

Translation assignments, weasel words, and Knowledge (XXG)'s content in its later years

1876: 1796:

Translation assignments, weasel words, and Knowledge (XXG)'s content in its later years

1708: 1574: 1564: 1369: 1180: 773: 746: 718: 694: 669: 496: 409: 357: 278: 175: 147: 3636:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

3512: 2308: 4258: 4227: 3852:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3770: 3669: 3566: 3488: 3476: 3344: 3084:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2891: 2743:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2628:

WikiVIP; Art Feminism; Medical articles; PR manipulation; Azerbaijani Knowledge (XXG)

2344: 2220:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2197: 2188: 1732: 1720: 1263:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1238: 1068: 1052: 702: 428: 122: 962:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

4550: 4015: 3896: 3880: 3853: 3357: 3309: 3089: 3085: 3001: 2748: 2744: 2644:

WMF bites the bullet on affiliation and FDC funding, elevates Wikimedia user groups

2578: 2562: 2225: 2221: 1950: 1917: 1866:

Hello Jinkinson. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

1658: 1650: 1542: 1341: 1318: 1286: 1268: 1264: 1234: 1131: 201: 3563:

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

3147:

There is a backlog of over 1300 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the

1685:

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in

4414: 3701: 3687: 3656: 3633: 3601: 3385: 2133: 2094: 2090: 1411: 1140:

It was the correct link, and if you had clicked on it, you would have seen that.

53:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2524:

You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page

4528:

made back in January: I agree and think it's about time to make the merge. --

3437: 3408: 2718: 944: 657: 3939:

Knowledge (XXG) Library finding success in matching contributors with sources

3743:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

1484:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

3522:

This message is to inform you that the Arbitration Committee has authorised

3380: 2212: 2086: 3795:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 3456:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! 1870:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1700:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! 563:

Is Google hurting Knowledge (XXG) traffic?; "Knowledge (XXG)-Mania" in the

555:

Licensed for reuse? Citing open-access sources in Knowledge (XXG) articles

4254: 4223: 3616:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

3403: 1301:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1559: 1536:

for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer

1014:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Administrators (Knowledge (XXG))

401: 394: 4452:

Wikimedians celebrate International Women's Day, Women's History Month

3651:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3104:

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive

1336:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3931:

Four paragraph lead, indefinitely blocked IPs, editor reviews broken?

2595:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Timothy Ball (2nd nomination)

2554: 805:

has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

476: 405: 3110: 1649:) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on 890:

Knowledge (XXG) for robots; Knowledge (XXG)—a temperamental teenager

3644:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about 4300:

Wait a minute. Did you make the IP's edit above while logged out?

4022:, for patrolling new pages and your informative user infobox, for 3530:, which you may have edited. The Committee's decision can be read 3424: 3007:

A brownie to you for reviewing at least 15 submissions during the

1637: 1616: 1368:

Well, it's out of article space now. I hope you're happy, Joshua.

3238:

Wikimedia chapters and communities challenge Commons' URAA policy

475:, it is asking citations for showing that Vishnu took avatar of 472: 468: 3415:), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with 3203:

Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?

3161:. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. 3138:

the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from

2485: 2093:

article. Please let me know if you can help. Many thanks, Kat

32: 3230:

Diary of a protester: Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest

3016:. Thanks for contributing to the backlog elimination drive! 3692: 3606: 3109: 2514:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1434: 1291: 265:

Well, Facebook isn't a reliable or independent source. See

4393:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

4202:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2582:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2389:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1991:

Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Knowledge (XXG)'s actions

1777:

Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Knowledge (XXG)'s actions

1072:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1001:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

4549:

Sorry about that I didn't mean you in my comment over at

4406:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Peanut butter test

3254:

CSCW '14 retrospective; the impact of SOPA on deletionism

2239:

A page you started (Set Yourself Free) has been reviewed!

796:

Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy (CRMEP)

3714:

fails on multiple levels including NN, attack page, etc.

2930:

Beats me what NAEG's problem is, maybe he'll be ok with

304:

Knowledge (XXG):Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014

297:

Knowledge (XXG):Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014

4387: