416:. The particular article in question covers an advanced topic in topology. Anyone reading this article will have an interest and a basic knowledge of topology already. If they don't know what a union is, they are really not the audience for this article. Therefore there is no need for this extra link; it does not add anything to the understanding of the article as far as its audience is concerned. In contrast, in a more basic article like
22:
449:
286:
28:
404:
I see that you are adding a lot of wikilinks to mathematics articles. Overall it may be ok, but we should not overdo it either. Different mathematics articles are written at different levels; some of them are geared to beginners, while others are more specialized and meant to be read by people with
240:
last fall with the outcome that at the moment we will continue capitalizing "Internet" in
Knowledge, even though several style guides changed to "internet". The Request for Comment to change was ruled "no consensus" with 30+ editors participating. The convention is to let some time pass before going
156:
Don't get me wrong, I love a good semicolon as much as the next
Wikipedian, and to be honest I probably overuse them. It was just that the semicolon I replaced seemed particularly unnecessary and a full stop seemed far more appropriate. In fact I think it was the first semicolon I've ever disagreed
241:
through another RFC process, but I suspect sometime this year or next it might come up again - at which point the voting might be different. But right now we're still using "Internet"... so I'm just going to revert this last change you made - but I wanted to explain
141:, with the remark "needlessly complicated punctuation". I hereby register my surprise; I find a semi-colon a very appealing way of continuing smoothly to a closely related thought. But you need not fear edit wars: I do not care as much as that!
405:
the requisite background and will not be (and don't need to be) understood by beginners lacking that background. Thus, in more specialized articles there is no need to overlink it, no need to create links to really basic mathematics terms.
494:
331:
478:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
315:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
463:
300:
264:
About your recent edit on the article; you are correct. I misunderstood the meaning of the edit (and thank you for the detailed edit summary). Good job on spotting the error. —-
42:. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Knowledge:
35:
87:
381:
I've been meaning to try to get the article to GA status. Do you have any thoughts on what improvements the article needs to get to that point?
76:
517:
354:
202:
56:
39:
177:
Just a heads-up about an edit of your I just reverted. First, wholesale changes of "nonempty" to "non-empty" shouldn't be made per
408:
Just to give one example (but I think the same would apply to other edits of yours too) for an article I am more familiar with:
513:
420:
for example, there can be and definitely should be a link to the "union" article. It all depends on the level of the article.
350:
71:
487:
324:
61:
499:
375:
368:
336:
409:
386:
198:
269:
254:
51:
46:
475:
312:
94:
90:
using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
401:
213:
158:
432:
382:
102:
83:
413:
194:
178:
146:
193:
adds semantic meaning to italicization of words for emphasis and should be retained. Thanks, –
457:
417:
294:
265:
233:
123:
98:
506:
471:
424:
343:
308:
182:
157:
with. You're right though: it was a very insignificant edit; I'm just very nit-picky. ;;;;;
109:
486:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
323:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
250:
38:, Joel Brennan. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for
483:
428:
320:
21:
479:
316:
237:
142:
66:
119:
448:
285:
188:
246:
245:
I was doing so. Thanks for your contributions to making
Knowledge better! -
521:
436:
390:
358:
273:
221:
206:
166:
150:
127:
490:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
327:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
467:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
304:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
27:
236:
article you had changed "Internet" to lowercase "internet". We had
503:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
340:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
97:! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
493:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
461:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
330:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
298:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
25:
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!
423:
And one could make similar comments about other links like
474:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
311:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
138:
228:At the moment, we're still capitalizing Internet
115:on your talk page and ask your question there.
8:
227:
238:a very lengthy discussion / RFC about this
93:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
20:
7:
458:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
295:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
185:); both are valid spellings. Also,
442:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
279:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
139:replaced a semicolon by a full stop
14:
133:Semicolon needlessly complicated?
447:
374:Thanks for the helpful edits at
284:
26:
497:and submit your choices on the
334:and submit your choices on the
232:Hi Joel. I noticed that in the
1:
522:00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
476:Knowledge arbitration process
359:01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
313:Knowledge arbitration process
167:20:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
151:20:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
52:The five pillars of Knowledge
34:Here's wishing you a belated
437:17:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
391:14:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
72:How to write a great article
376:Constant-recursive sequence
369:Constant-recursive sequence
77:Editor's index to Knowledge
540:
514:MediaWiki message delivery
410:Exhaustion by compact sets
351:MediaWiki message delivery
222:12:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
207:19:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
128:21:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
57:Contributing to Knowledge
511:to your user talk page.
412:. You added a link for
348:to your user talk page.
274:16:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
255:01:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
217:
162:
82:Also, when you post on
31:
472:Arbitration Committee
455:Hello! Voting in the
309:Arbitration Committee
292:Hello! Voting in the
24:
425:reverse implications
36:welcome to Knowledge
103:Knowledge:Questions
488:arbitration policy
325:arbitration policy
212:Noted. Thank you.
62:How to edit a page
40:your contributions
32:
17:A belated welcome!
524:
418:topological space
396:Excessive linking
361:
234:sleep deprivation
531:
512:
510:
451:
349:
347:
288:
192:
118:Again, welcome!
114:
108:
30:
539:
538:
534:
533:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
504:
452:
444:
398:
372:
364:
363:
341:
289:
281:
262:
230:
186:
175:
137:I see that you
135:
112:
106:
19:
12:
11:
5:
537:
535:
495:the candidates
464:eligible users
453:
446:
445:
443:
440:
397:
394:
383:Caleb Stanford
371:
365:
332:the candidates
301:eligible users
290:
283:
282:
280:
277:
261:
260:Valuation ring
258:
229:
226:
225:
224:
181:(and possibly
174:
173:A couple notes
171:
170:
169:
134:
131:
88:sign your name
80:
79:
74:
69:
64:
59:
54:
49:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
536:
525:
523:
519:
515:
508:
502:
501:
496:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
468:
466:
465:
460:
459:
450:
441:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
419:
415:
411:
406:
403:
395:
393:
392:
388:
384:
379:
377:
370:
366:
362:
360:
356:
352:
345:
339:
338:
333:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
303:
302:
297:
296:
287:
278:
276:
275:
271:
267:
259:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
235:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:Deacon Vorbis
190:
184:
180:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
132:
130:
129:
125:
121:
116:
111:
104:
100:
96:
91:
89:
85:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
44:
43:
41:
37:
29:
23:
16:
498:
492:
469:
462:
456:
454:
422:
407:
402:Joel Brennan
399:
380:
373:
335:
329:
306:
299:
293:
291:
263:
242:
231:
214:Joel Brennan
176:
159:Joel Brennan
136:
117:
99:my talk page
92:
81:
47:Introduction
33:
500:voting page
337:voting page
179:WP:STYLEVAR
105:, or place
86:you should
484:topic bans
367:improving
321:topic bans
101:, consult
95:Wikipedian
84:talk pages
67:Help pages
480:site bans
429:PatrickR2
317:site bans
183:WP:ENGVAR
143:PJTraill
507:NoACEMM
427:, etc.
344:NoACEMM
120:Wikiacc
110:help me
203:videos
199:carbon
414:union
378:! :)
247:Dyork
518:talk
470:The
433:talk
387:talk
355:talk
307:The
270:talk
266:Taku
251:talk
218:talk
163:talk
147:talk
400:Hi
243:why
520:)
509:}}
505:{{
482:,
435:)
389:)
357:)
346:}}
342:{{
319:,
272:)
253:)
220:)
205:)
201:•
191:}}
189:em
187:{{
165:)
149:)
126:)
113:}}
107:{{
516:(
431:(
385:(
353:(
268:(
249:(
216:(
197:(
161:(
145:(
124:¶
122:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
