Knowledge

User talk:25162995

Source 📝

275:
Provide a source that says she was not convicted and prove this in talk. Then revert when you have proven your case in comparison to black and white facts. WP:BOLD)" (this can all be seen in the WP:Amanda knox-edit history page) at which point the users simply reverted again (as the have been doing for many weeks with other users) and stated in TALK:"Not interested in arguing with someone that won't consider other views and will aggressively push their view into the article. This is something that has been extensively discussed here and on the MoMK page. For now, see the WP:EWN report. Ravensfire (talk) 23:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)" The fact of the matter remains that with regards to this article the sources are clear in stating the conviction. I am asking for my ban to be reverted due to the fact that this "3rr" comes under WP:NOT3RR
441:
based on opinion with no verifiable source to back up (unlike my highly verifiable sourced data from three of the world leading news providers). I would also reiterate that no matter how arrogant i sound in affirming i am as you call it "RIGHT" this if checked is actually the case due to the fact the other reverting editors claim "no consensus" and yet have no verifiable sources to back up there supposed consensus. Therefore i feel that upholding the block and the accusations of my supposed "superior reading" is tantamount to WP:NOPUNISH due to the fact that i have not been disruptive. Failing this appeal i will to take the issue to WP:ARB and submit my case via email.
100: 828: 1003: 930: 501: 355: 189: 785: 684:
I never once said i would continue edit warring. I said i would revert if i saw it as WP:NOT3R which is exactly what this case is. Evidently you and other admins care only about trivial edit wars and not the exact ins and outs of this case which shows an extreme example of why people may distrust WK
586:
You claim i was edit warring and yet provide no feedback on the fact that the reversions by the two other users who reinstated opinion with no verifiable sourced information-I dont believe its edit warring and in future i will do exactly the same again in the same circumstances where black and white
440:
I do not believe that i am being a "wikilawyer" when i am following the rules this website clearly specifies with regards to one of its core principles which is WP:V. My edits/reverts were done because the information in the lead of the aforementioned article is poorly sourced contentious material
301:
You were edit warring. You have shown that you have no interest in collaboration, because your opinion is RIGHT and anyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and you have explicitly stated that you do not intend to accept consensus. Your attempts to wikilawyer round the subject, and represent your
274:
contribs)‎ . . (34,074 bytes) (+98)‎ . . (Again reverted back to sources. No consensus is needed because it is clearly stated that conviction stands. This is stated in sources in black and white. DO NOT 3rr" in an attempt to stop 3rr followed by a request to "(Go to talk. Do no start an edit war.
1015:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
707:
Edit-warring to force your version when multiple editors disagree with you will not help. You'll end up blocked and lose any chance to further make your points. You're in a dispute and there are better ways to try and resolve it. You've got a couple of noticeboards that might help
667:
Oh, and proclaiming that you'll continue edit-warring when your block expires pretty much guarantees that said block will become permanent, so I'd rethink that statement if I were you: blocks are not punitive, but preventative, and this would be a textbook case for an indefinite one.
277:"Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP). What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption" 942:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
885:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1043: 970: 1027:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 954:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 303: 302:
refusal to accept Knowledge policies as based on some higher and superior reading of policy is not more convincing here than it was on the article talk page or on
279:
and is a 3rr exception because the reversions by users:Ravensfire/Binksternet clearly provide no evidence thus coming under "poorly sourced contentious material"
463:
You were unambiguously edit warring. Feel free to attempt to get ArbCom to validate your edit warring. Or just stop doing it; the latter will be much easier.
645:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
492:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
346:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
541: 395: 229: 1057: 984: 910: 630: 477: 331: 144: 1053: 980: 906: 170: 793: 536: 390: 224: 150: 1036: 963: 158: 27: 897:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1048: 975: 902: 128: 513:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
367:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
201:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
848: 514: 368: 202: 162: 107: 508: 362: 196: 657: 617: 587:
verifiable fact outweighs outsourced POV because i believe that my actions were WP:NOT3R as stated before
555: 409: 317: 243: 124: 116: 1024: 951: 739: 725: 178: 898: 844: 832: 762:
Its not "my version" its a citated verifiable fact in black and white which admins clearly ignore.
154: 857: 814: 805: 720:. After your block expires, please don't try to force your version into the article. Yes, be 1011: 938: 920: 874: 865: 840: 831:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge. Your edits appear to constitute
801: 611: 313: 804:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 1020: 947: 894: 878: 673: 639: 486: 340: 134: 1035:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 962:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 893:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 733: 713: 174: 99: 82:
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
800:
because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
1032: 959: 890: 882: 836: 721: 709: 1028: 955: 886: 852: 809: 789: 763: 729: 686: 588: 519: 464: 442: 373: 280: 207: 717: 1002: 929: 17: 669: 120: 92: 127:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 59:
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons
51:. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied. 797: 1039:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
966:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
784: 56:
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
1061: 988: 914: 859: 816: 771: 745: 694: 676: 620: 596: 467: 450: 321: 288: 182: 40:
Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
881:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1042:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
969:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
732:, remember? Bold change that gets Reverted means Discussion. 66:
Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
839:
or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
609:
Pledging to resume in the behavior = you're doing it wrong.
499: 353: 187: 98: 157:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 716:
are the two most likely). Also read through the various
627:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
474:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
328:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
647:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
494:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
348:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1023:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
950:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
792:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of 569: 565: 559: 550: 546: 532: 528: 524: 423: 419: 413: 404: 400: 386: 382: 378: 257: 253: 247: 238: 234: 220: 216: 212: 74: 36:. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me: 161:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 507:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
361:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
195:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
71:
To initiate a new conversation on this page, please
304:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 123:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 873:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 685:in general or be put off from actually editing. 131:by adding the following text below this notice: 8: 664:is pretty black-and-white verifiable fact. 149:During a dispute, you should first try to 7: 1012:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 939:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 996:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 25: 899:review the candidates' statements 309:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1001: 928: 826: 783: 169:The full report of this case is 1046:and submit your choices on the 1009:Hello, 25162995. Voting in the 936:Hello, 25162995. Voting in the 143:. However, you should read the 905:. For the Election committee, 875:Arbitration Committee election 866:ArbCom elections are now open! 656:edit-warring. Read this link: 1: 1025:Knowledge arbitration process 989:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 952:Knowledge arbitration process 915:13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 860:20:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 817:20:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC) 151:discuss controversial changes 111:from editing for a period of 1062:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 28:User talk:Johnsy88/Archive 1 973:and submit your choices on 901:and submit your choices on 511:, who declined the request. 365:, who declined the request. 199:, who declined the request. 45:a message on your talk page 1079: 1054:MediaWiki message delivery 981:MediaWiki message delivery 971:the candidates' statements 907:MediaWiki message delivery 849:loss of editing privileges 718:dispute resolution options 794:your recent contributions 772:17:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 746:17:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 695:17:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 677:16:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 631:guide to appealing blocks 621:16:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 597:15:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 478:guide to appealing blocks 468:15:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 451:15:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 332:guide to appealing blocks 322:13:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 289:09:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 183:02:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 145:guide to appealing blocks 125:make useful contributions 767: 690: 592: 446: 284: 49:DO NOT post a reply here 724:, but you also need to 34:Welcome to my talk page 658:Knowledge:Edit warring 504: 358: 192: 171:at the 3RR noticeboard 103: 1021:Arbitration Committee 948:Arbitration Committee 921:ArbCom Elections 2016 879:Arbitration Committee 556:change block settings 503: 410:change block settings 357: 244:change block settings 191: 139:Your reason here ~~~~ 102: 883:arbitration process 1037:arbitration policy 964:arbitration policy 923:: Voting now open! 895:arbitration policy 847:can result in the 505: 359: 193: 159:dispute resolution 104: 75:click on this link 18:User talk:Johnsy88 311: 129:appeal this block 16:(Redirected from 1070: 1005: 932: 855: 830: 829: 812: 787: 742: 644: 638: 615: 575: 573: 562: 544: 542:deleted contribs 502: 491: 485: 429: 427: 416: 398: 396:deleted contribs 356: 345: 339: 307: 263: 261: 250: 232: 230:deleted contribs 190: 142: 119:, as you did at 91:Edit warring at 77: 21: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1006: 998: 993: 992: 976:the voting page 933: 925: 903:the voting page 869: 853: 827: 824: 810: 740: 650: 642: 636: 635:, then use the 624: 613: 600: 563: 553: 539: 522: 515:blocking policy 500: 497: 489: 483: 482:, then use the 471: 454: 417: 407: 393: 376: 369:blocking policy 354: 351: 343: 337: 336:, then use the 325: 292: 251: 241: 227: 210: 203:blocking policy 188: 167: 163:page protection 132: 96: 85: 73: 62: 43:If I have left 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1076: 1074: 1044:the candidates 1007: 1000: 999: 997: 994: 934: 927: 926: 924: 918: 872: 868: 863: 835:and have been 823: 820: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 700: 699: 698: 697: 625: 607: 603:Decline reason 584: 580:Request reason 577: 498: 472: 461: 457:Decline reason 438: 434:Request reason 431: 352: 326: 299: 295:Decline reason 272: 268:Request reason 265: 186: 105:You have been 97: 95: 89: 87: 84: 83: 80: 69: 68: 67: 64: 60: 54: 53: 52: 31: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1075: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1004: 995: 991: 990: 986: 982: 978: 977: 972: 967: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 944: 941: 940: 931: 922: 919: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 867: 864: 862: 861: 858: 856: 851:. Thank you. 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 822:November 2015 821: 819: 818: 815: 813: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 786: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 747: 743: 737: 736: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 696: 692: 688: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 675: 671: 665: 663: 659: 655: 649: 648: 641: 634: 632: 623: 622: 619: 618: 616: 606: 604: 599: 598: 594: 590: 583: 581: 576: 571: 567: 561: 557: 552: 548: 543: 538: 534: 533:global blocks 530: 529:active blocks 526: 521: 516: 512: 510: 509:administrator 496: 495: 488: 481: 479: 470: 469: 466: 460: 458: 453: 452: 448: 444: 437: 435: 430: 425: 421: 415: 411: 406: 402: 397: 392: 388: 387:global blocks 384: 383:active blocks 380: 375: 370: 366: 364: 363:administrator 350: 349: 342: 335: 333: 324: 323: 319: 315: 310: 305: 298: 296: 291: 290: 286: 282: 278: 271: 269: 264: 259: 255: 249: 245: 240: 236: 231: 226: 222: 221:global blocks 218: 217:active blocks 214: 209: 204: 200: 198: 197:administrator 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 166: 164: 160: 156: 152: 146: 140: 136: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 101: 94: 90: 88: 81: 78: 76: 70: 65: 58: 57: 55: 50: 46: 42: 41: 39: 38: 37: 35: 30: 29: 19: 1047: 1041: 1018: 1010: 1008: 974: 968: 945: 937: 935: 870: 825: 806:my talk page 782: 734: 666: 661: 653: 651: 646: 628: 626: 610: 608: 602: 601: 585: 579: 578: 551:creation log 518: 506: 493: 475: 473: 462: 456: 455: 439: 433: 432: 405:creation log 372: 360: 347: 329: 327: 314:JamesBWatson 308: 300: 294: 293: 276: 273: 267: 266: 239:creation log 206: 194: 168: 148: 138: 117:edit warring 112: 106: 86: 72: 48: 44: 33: 32: 26: 1049:voting page 843:. Repeated 788:Hello, I'm 121:Amanda Knox 93:Amanda Knox 1033:topic bans 960:topic bans 891:topic bans 808:. Thanks. 735:Ravensfire 547:filter log 465:--jpgordon 401:filter log 235:filter log 175:EdJohnston 1029:site bans 956:site bans 887:site bans 845:vandalism 833:vandalism 629:read the 566:checkuser 525:block log 476:read the 420:checkuser 379:block log 330:read the 254:checkuser 213:block log 155:consensus 153:and seek 854:Buffaboy 837:reverted 811:Buffaboy 790:Buffaboy 764:25162995 714:WP:NPOVN 687:25162995 614:itsJamie 589:25162995 537:contribs 520:25162995 443:25162995 391:contribs 374:25162995 281:25162995 225:contribs 208:25162995 137:|reason= 113:48 hours 841:sandbox 802:sandbox 726:discuss 722:WP:BOLD 710:WP:BLPN 640:unblock 560:unblock 487:unblock 414:unblock 341:unblock 248:unblock 135:unblock 108:blocked 47:please 877:. The 730:WP:BRD 670:Calton 147:first. 798:Björk 633:first 480:first 334:first 1058:talk 1019:The 985:talk 946:The 911:talk 768:talk 741:talk 712:and 691:talk 674:Talk 662:That 654:were 652:You 612:OhNo 593:talk 447:talk 318:talk 285:talk 179:talk 115:for 871:Hi, 796:to 728:. 570:log 517:). 424:log 371:). 316:" ( 306:. 258:log 205:). 61:':' 1060:) 1052:. 1031:, 987:) 979:. 958:, 913:) 889:, 770:) 744:) 693:) 672:| 668:-- 660:. 643:}} 637:{{ 605:: 595:) 582:: 564:• 558:• 554:• 549:• 545:• 540:• 535:• 531:• 527:• 490:}} 484:{{ 459:: 449:) 436:: 418:• 412:• 408:• 403:• 399:• 394:• 389:• 385:• 381:• 344:}} 338:{{ 320:) 297:: 287:) 270:: 252:• 246:• 242:• 237:• 233:• 228:• 223:• 219:• 215:• 181:) 173:. 165:. 141:}} 133:{{ 1056:( 983:( 909:( 766:( 738:( 708:( 689:( 591:( 574:) 572:) 568:( 523:( 445:( 428:) 426:) 422:( 377:( 312:" 283:( 262:) 260:) 256:( 211:( 177:( 79:. 63:. 20:)

Index

User talk:Johnsy88
User talk:Johnsy88/Archive 1
click on this link
Amanda Knox
Stop icon with clock
blocked
edit warring
Amanda Knox
make useful contributions
appeal this block
unblock
guide to appealing blocks
discuss controversial changes
consensus
dispute resolution
page protection
at the 3RR noticeboard
EdJohnston
talk
02:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
administrator
blocking policy
25162995
block log
active blocks
global blocks
contribs
deleted contribs
filter log
creation log

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.