Knowledge

User talk:Kdelf

Source 📝

232:, external links aren't looked on terribly favorably. First, the "offical" link is already in the infobox (higher on the page), so it doesn't need to be duplicated. Second, wikilinks are preferred over external links, so that gets rid of the need for a school district link. Third, more than one official link to an organization isn't needed- it's up to the org to design their website so one link is sufficient. Imagine I was writing about 217:
For the n00b question, a couple of things. First, check the article history to see if an edit summary was used in the revert, who did it, etc. Often they will say the reason they were reverted. The general rule is to improve rather than mass-revert someone's changes, but if they are 80% or 90% junk,
178:
I do work for Eugene 4J, and can be confident that all of the information I have added is completely correct. I spotted several inaccuracies (e.g. closed schools still being listed) in the Knowledge page and thought they should be corrected, then went on to expand the article from its original stub
182:
My affiliation is clearly noted in my account information, but I'm not sure who can see that — I created an account instead of making anonymous edits as I have done (on non-4J-related pages) in the past, so the conflict of interest would be stated...but is there somewhere else I can and should list
222:
if you do). If nothing else, discuss it on the talk page. If it's controversial, promotes COI, etc, just post it to the talk page, wait a couple of days for responses, and then (assuming nobody replies) feel free to add it to the article. Obviously, that's only for things that are in "your" favor-
189:
A n00b question for you: I made one batch of edits, correcting a whole bunch of inaccuracies in the middle school list, and also making some more minor changes to internal content. That batch of edits appeared to have been reverted in toto. So when I had a little time to add more information and
280:
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to
179:
state. I've tried to provide relevant information in a neutral and non-promotional way, while feeling confident that other, more experienced Knowledge editors would change anything they thought unsuitable, and hopefully add information from their own knowledge and perspectives!
324:! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Knowledge are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the 190:
make more corrections, I did it in small batches, clearly stating the content changes in the edit summary each time. What do you think? Better to do big edits all at once, or lots of small edits, so others can see clearly what is being changed? Thanks!
207:
Hey, just realized I hadn't responded to this. I've had a bit of a crisis revolving around my computer, finally getting a new system up and running, so off the temporary, small, and slow laptop. What you've done for stating the COI
268:
I have put together a survey for female editors of Knowledge (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
312: 186:
Thanks for the tips on formatting — I was trying to be internally consistent within the article, and didn't realize that my formatting was contrary to general Knowledge style. Good to know.
218:
the baby will get tossed out with the bathwater, so to speak. Next up is to contact the editor who reverted it if you aren't sure. Don't re-add things (it's getting close to
157:
In general, some of the changes have made the article look more like a brochure for the school district, which isn't what Wiki is for. Let me know if you have questions.
272:
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
236:. I'd have an official link to amazon.com, but would I also need one to books.amazon.com, clothing.amazon.com, etc? Not really. This is all addressed in 212:
is perfect. Some of your earlier edits were sketchy, honestly, but you've been making a wider range of edits and citing things better. Way to go.
275: 52: 57: 48: 61: 31: 356: 67: 245:
Cheers, and it's nice to see you around. Have you seen WikiProject Oregon? If not, I'll send you an invite.
367: 286: 38: 27: 74: 78: 90: 82: 43: 34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 89:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 363: 282: 124:); the edits you've been making include some information not terribly suitable for Knowledge. 250: 162: 106: 94: 138:
Don't Use Capital Letters In Section Titles (it should be "Don't use capital letters..")
150: 146: 121: 336: 237: 219: 142: 371: 246: 158: 102: 233: 209: 193: 331:
As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
120:
Hi- do you work for the Eugene SD? It's good to state your COI (see
311: 290: 254: 201: 166: 110: 86: 355:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our
343: 339:
and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
276:
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
310: 349: 359:(under construction) to see how else you can participate! 229: 132: 97:, or ask your question on this page and then place 8: 223:saying the ESD did a really good job at X. 73:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 101:before the question. Again, welcome! 337:WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook 7: 228:I did notice something, though- on 14: 362:Can't wait to have you involved! 149:, and most of them should NOT be 58:How to create your first article 131:Don't put external links (like 291:16:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 342:Join the conversation on our 295: 39:The five pillars of Knowledge 348:Reading and writing for our 255:07:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 202:08:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 167:01:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 153:(the school district's site) 111:17:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 30:to Knowledge! Thank you for 372:23:32, 9 October 2012 (UTC) 391: 326:WikiWomen's Collaborative 302: 296:WikiWomen's Collaborative 197: 127:Some other guidelines: 53:How to develop articles 315: 281:Knowledge! Thank you! 314: 17:Welcome to Knowledge 91:Knowledge:Questions 316: 49:How to edit a page 32:your contributions 26:Hello, Kdelf, and 378: 377: 303:WikiWomen Unite! 81:your messages on 382: 300: 299: 143:reliable sources 135:) in the article 100: 83:discussion pages 390: 389: 385: 384: 383: 381: 380: 379: 317: 298: 263: 151:primary sources 118: 98: 68:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 388: 386: 376: 375: 361: 360: 353: 352: 346: 340: 329: 318: 309: 306: 305: 304: 297: 294: 262: 259: 258: 257: 242: 241: 225: 224: 214: 213: 175:Hi, Tedder! 173: 171: 155: 154: 139: 136: 117: 114: 71: 70: 65: 62:Article Wizard 55: 46: 41: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 387: 374: 373: 369: 365: 358: 351: 347: 345: 341: 338: 334: 333: 332: 327: 323: 319: 313: 308: 307: 301: 293: 292: 288: 284: 278: 277: 273: 270: 266: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 226: 221: 216: 215: 211: 206: 205: 204: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 168: 164: 160: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137: 134: 130: 129: 128: 125: 123: 115: 113: 112: 108: 104: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 69: 66: 63: 59: 56: 54: 50: 47: 45: 42: 40: 37: 36: 35: 33: 29: 24: 23: 16: 364:SarahStierch 354: 350:blog channel 344:Twitter feed 330: 325: 321: 283:SarahStierch 279: 274: 271: 267: 264: 240:fairly well. 220:edit warring 192: 188: 185: 181: 177: 174: 170: 156: 126: 119: 95:my talk page 93:, ask me on 72: 64:if you wish) 25: 21: 20: 335:Liking the 85:using four 60:(using the 265:Hi Kdelf! 234:Amazon.com 99:{{helpme}} 75:Wikipedian 357:meta page 230:this edit 147:citations 133:this link 116:Eugene SD 77:! Please 145:in your 44:Tutorial 22:Welcome! 28:welcome 261:Survey 247:tedder 183:it? 159:tedder 122:WP:COI 103:tedder 87:tildes 322:Kdelf 238:WP:EL 194:Kdelf 368:talk 287:talk 251:talk 210:here 198:talk 163:talk 141:Use 107:talk 79:sign 51:and 320:Hi 370:) 289:) 253:) 200:) 165:) 109:) 366:( 328:. 285:( 249:( 208:( 196:( 161:( 105:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Article Wizard
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
my talk page
tedder
talk
17:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
WP:COI
this link
reliable sources
citations
primary sources
tedder
talk
01:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Kdelf
talk
08:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
here

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.