User talk:Kekkomereq4

366:, along with my review tag, and in the edit summary window, typing "withdrawing (article name)". Leave "Foxy Lady" there for now - i need to work out how todeal with that one now the review has been partly written. Please do keep improving the articles, and keep an eye out for other editors who you could ask if they would help out. I would encourage you to split the album articles up into sections as suggested in the Foxy Lady review. I know you have some sections now, I'm suggesting that you change to the sorts of sections more commonly used in album articles - background, tracks, singles / hits, critical reception / impact on career. Regards, 245:

to featured list status, then the lead and history sections will need to be expanded for this list. Keep looking for sources, perhaps older newspaper articles that cover the tours to find additional details to add. For the filmography, the lead will also need to be expanded, and additional sources are needed for "Film roles associated with Cher". In addition, the "Music from motion pictures" table needs to be sorted so that the older songs are listed first, just like the other tables. The

2835: 491: 1738: 3945: 3893: 3748: 3696: 3587: 3531: 3475: 3419: 2414: 2358: 2302: 2246: 2135: 1336: 1239: 1142: 1045: 948: 851: 754: 657: 3841: 2049: 3801: 3357: 3296: 2750: 2649: 2588: 2527: 2968: 1644: 1585: 1526: 1434: 1822: 318:. This is going to be crucial for you if you are going to get any of these articles promoted. Most of the sources you are using look like they do not meet these standards - they are web pges produced by individuals or groups of fans and are not peer-reviewed; or they are official fan sites. These won't in general qualify as reliable sources. There are sites you have used that 102: 3962:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3910:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3765:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3713:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3606:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3550:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3494:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3438:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2433:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2377:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2321:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2265:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2809:

Good news, a proposed deletion may be removed if an editor has any legitimate reason for declining it. the reason for the PROD was no refs. you have provided refs. You may now safely remove the PROD notice at the top of the page, and include in your edit summary the reason: "i added refs, and believe

339:

and I would normally 'quickfail' them because of serious referencing problems. I will leave it for a few days while you work out what you want to do. You might like to withdraw them for now and work on them, then re-nominate; or you might like to leave them and quickly try to improve them, maybe with

297:

Hi there, I have tagged the Cher articles you have put up at GAN for review. I intended to 'quickfail' most of them, but I thought I should drop by here first, because I was not sure how familiar you are with the processes etc at Good Article Nomination. I saw the previous post from Hekerui, and s/he

249:

can't be used as a source, but you can list it as an external link. Try and replace all IMDB links with new sources. If your goal is FL, then have editors who also work on Cher articles check them over for accuracy, look to other similar FLs, and start a peer review. Hopefully this is helpful, and if

244:

Hello, and thanks for contacting me. I wasn't sure exactly how you wanted me to review the article, so I'll point out some issues I noticed here. I reworded the lead for the concert tour list as its common practice now to not begin lists with "This is a list...". If your ultimate goal is to get these

147:

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Knowledge. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright

1988:

I see you started an investigation. I just weighed in with my two cents there. However, I see that IamTorgo hasn't been notified of the investigation. I think it's only fair to let him (and the other accounts alleged to be his socks) know it's going on so he/they has/have a chance to defend himself.

361:

about your Cher articles, in hope that one or more editors might come to your aid. It doesn't look like they have unfortunately. I must give you credit for achieving a lot in your second language and with limited materials. You've done well. However, I don't think any of the articles will pass at GA

310:

2) "it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". I have only reviewed one article in detail

325:

4)"it addresses the main aspects of the topic". First off, I want to say thank you for all these new articles - they have added a lot of information about a major popular artist of the late 20th century; information that simply wasn't here before you got to work, so that is great. To be promoted to

306:

1) "the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct" These Cher album articles tend to have prose problems. I encourage you to approach some other editors you find working on Cher-related topics, and invite them to help you with the prose - get them to copyedit the album articles you've

334:

Of the four poiints above, the first three are crucial - the fourth is a judgement call, and other editors may take a different view to me. I have tagged all the Cher album articles at GAN saying I will review them. I have reviewed the first - Foxy Lady - and put it on hold. See my comments there

1913:

I'll try to weigh in some time in the next few days. I just bought a house and don't have Internet there yet, so I only have it at work and can very seldom edit Knowledge this week. What is the situation with The Scarlet Letter right now? How many say it should stay, how many stay it should go? —

581:

Hi. What I meant by that last sentence is: what is it you are asking me to do? I am actually trying to reduce the time I spend online, but if there is some way I can be of assistance when other, more urgent matters are not present, then I'd be happy to check in, review your work, discuss things

273:

Hi, thank you for contributing to topics relating to Cher. I saw you nominated several Cher album articles for good article status, but I wanted to tell you that I'm concerned with the sources cherscholar.com and homepages.ihug.com.au because I'm not sure how they fulfil

1675:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1616:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1557:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 3865:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2075:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

2023:

We do not normally delete user talk pages, though you are welcome to blank it if you like (the history is needed for the record). Nor do we delete accounts: if you want to abandon this account, you can simply stop using it. Regards,

2467:

Hey, you should take a look on Cher's article at the Knowledge in portuguese. It's well ilustrated, very well written, complete and have a big number of references. It's also a featured article. You may translate it to english.

2079:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3869:

3656:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 223:

Hey I've made some final comments and requests regarding this GA review. Please take a look when you get a chance and let me know what you think. I'd like to wrap this up as much as you would I'm sure.

1671:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1612:

1553:

1450:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 1763:

states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the

2072: 3812: 3389:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3328:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2782:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2681:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2620:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2559:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 326:

GA, they are going to need more detail in general, on tracks, on production, and on critical reception, and I encourage you to create sections on each major topic. That said, a

1959:

accounts that we don't know about. I've never filed a sockpuppet investigation, so I'm not really sure how it all works, but I'd strongly encourage you to take a look at it. —

497: 490: 3385:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3324:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2778:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2677:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2616:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2555:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

426:

Ok,I think that the album is a compilation because it contains songs previous recorded for others olds albums, with two remix and one unreleased song. According with Lear

3160: 3208: 3184: 1461:

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

156:). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the 3156: 2814:

the article, where a discussion will occur before action is taken. I think this is notable, but you have done enough to avoid a PRODDED deletion, at least. good work.

3204: 3180: 109:. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the 2162: