User talk:KhabarNegar - Knowledge (XXG)

1664:

I here ask to provide me with one time which a direct specific clear ask in any Talk page from me with I don’t answer and act in a good appreciated way… Any edit here from me is from good faith, if anyone feels it’s disruptive (the reason this block happened) it’s may be because of his/her own prejudgments about me, so he/she sees anything I do not good. I am neutral, 100% but if anyone things I’m not, 1- I want to tell him/her he had been wrong, 2- I will not again do any contribution about such articles again, because I learn that as much as you act according facts and logic accepted by all again there are something people really don’t like, so don’t bother them, so you are right I am not going to put something which majority of en.wikipedia see as not acceptable & not good, OK. But really I just thought Knowledge (XXG) as a good place to talk about facts about realities which are important, but Okay, I don’t care from now on. I also want to ask Users to keep calm, and do not judge too soon… what they may see as not good if they think twice they may feel that is actually right… Never mind… I request to 1- If someone have the time read this

213: 1667:, OR 2- If you do not have time just unblock this account to see my further contribution to get to the point which I am not really a disruptive editor as mentioned in Block reason. I will not do any contribution in articles which have Users that don’t agree with me, even though I may think I am doing a positive thing. I think I should be unblocked because I never ever rejected any request for discussion in Talk pages of the articles… Please provide differential edits that shows I have not accepted a reliable specific advice in any Talk page. So I will be able to answer. Here 1871:(That, and it was an insanely long and convoluted set of diffs that were provided there). As I said, any admin can take any action they choose without any hard feelings from me, and without my permission. My recommendation is that Khabar discuss here, discover what the problems are, simply indicate a willingness to work on them, and help us provide a path forward. The type of disruption here is very broad, it isn't a singular thing. I didn't have the authority at ANI to impose a topic ban, although an unblocking admin 1671:

probably it were not received by others, I do believe probably it’s because hurry stereotyping prejudgments, But anyway I should just quit editing in certain articles, and I will do that, because I understand that as a normal ordinary user it is not actually that much important what I think specially when there a group of Users that feel they don’t like your edits, so why to bother… OK I will just quit editing in those pages… As I actually have done this already if you see & check that… I think you all may ask

3274: 2900: 2654: 2562:. Someone else had changed the terms. I am an editor in fa.Knowledge (XXG), and let me be honest with you guys, the behavior I see here, is not friendly at all. but I don't care I will remain positive & will not get involve in any conflict, I will do anything according Knowledge (XXG) policy. AND till now I Have done nothing against any rules of Knowledge (XXG), & just look how I got treated here. Anyway please DO read here for more info 1522:. Not a single link to the reason for this block... For a block two things are needed: One which is most important is link of dif which is the problem, two the any talks which had happened about that difs and shows I acted against a rule of Knowledge (XXG) and have repeated that too. Not a single links about these issues are provided , so the decision which made by User:Dennis Brown is wrong according Knowledge (XXG) methods & standards. 2925: 1313: 5725: 5677: 5629: 5581: 5519: 5471: 5423: 5375: 5327: 5279: 5231: 5183: 5135: 5087: 5039: 4991: 4943: 4895: 4847: 4798: 3950: 2857: 2139:, I know you don't believe me but I do not hate you,(as you have said above). This is the problem, you guys are making all these USA vs. Iran or you hate me so I hate you back & these kinds of logic. No one hates anyone, logic, facts; mathematics & reality do not need hate at all. Try to see the world and understand it by Logic & Mathematics (Facts), so I’m not interested in wasting my time anymore. 4770: 4717: 4664: 1583: 4555: 4315: 4209: 3845: 1434: 1056: 1097: 1341: 1852:

in other articles which do not trigger the problematic behavior and frankly in which he will not be likely to encounter a cabal of impatient and hostile editors. I didn't see any good faith effort to mentor him in the history of his difficulties, just accusations, namecalling, policy citations and challenges. Please consider changing this to a topic-related block.

2864: 1814:

is only ticking off "incremental block" boxes until he gets an indef that no one will unblock, ever. Their best chance at coming back in a productive way is to indef and engage here. I clearly gave any admin permission to unblock without even asking my opinion first above. I just didn't know if a week or a month was going to be long enough to

1022: 912: 423: 2197:: TippyGoomba, the only thing that I wanted to tell above is, I think there is a little mistake in your judgment about me, I do not hate anyone, anything, any... . No one hates you, please think this way, maybe you find interesting things. Anyway, Never mind..., & I don't think if I have any more interest in that subject anymore, Regards, 2907: 1766:

piled on this relative newbie and there was plenty of borderline personal animosity in their complaints. Really gratuitous to this uninvolved observer. I think that the block should be modified as proposed to a six-month topic block which would allow the editor to branch out and contribute in less contentious areas.

2607:(which we all know now, that have wrong description), cause I'm Not convinced why it should be removed?! Its simply not fair, and there no reason behind it! Even in the first place as everyone can see above these bans where not acceptable, Simply its asked to stop being illogical, Thanks. Any one disagree? 3043:

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to

1870:

I don't want you to think I was ignoring you, but I did spend a great deal of time pouring over probably 100 diffs and trying to determine the least aggressive way to deal with the problem. Looking at the issue at a glance, it is easy to dismiss, which is probably why so few participated at the ANI.

1851:

If a user is entirely blocked, there's not going to be any constructive mentoring, just abstract discussion, to which neither party is likely to devote much time or attention. A much better way to engage mentors and to allow the user to hone his skills would be a topic block so that he can re-engage

1405:

An indef block doesn't mean forever, but you need some mentoring, some remedial work on copyright, reliable sources and collaboration. At this point, your participation is disruptive and causing unnecessary stress for a number of people. Hopefully, this is something you can address then come back in

346:

Hi Sir, How are you? Nice to see you here in EN.wiki. Sir I do appreciate your good Patriotism & thank you for this. But common! Persian and Persia is a traditional name, nowadays we talk Farsi and we live in Iran. You know, I mean if we want to be called Persia again so we have to do it from our

2079:

I'd considered that and thus suggested that he leave suggestions on *my* talk page, rather than the article page. I'm more interested in his sources, he's been good at finding them, less so at introducing them. Conveniently, I love reading them, but hate looking for them. It's a good relationship. I

1875:

do that as a pre-condition of an unblock if Khabar agrees to it. Admin can't just unilaterally impose a "ban" on someone, that is against policy. I will be happy to help, but Doc James has already indicated he will consider the unblock. Now it is up to Khabar to start the dialog in a calm manner,

1813:

The block was strong, I know because I did it, with the understanding that someone would work with him to understand what he is doing wrong. There is no fixed period of time that would solve the problem. When someone is clueless as to the issue, giving them a 24 hour or 1 week block is useless and

1663:

In all time which I was in Knowledge (XXG) till now I always use & answer & talk in Talk pages of the articles, There is not a single time which a direct transparent request from me, which I did not answer. I always listen to any specific thing which is told in any Talk page of the articles.

3969:

for more information on uploading your material to Knowledge (XXG). For legal reasons, Knowledge (XXG) cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted.

2276:

I actually didn't want my log history became like this even with one block, in this case I was not in acceptance of what happened in AN/I, but not a big deal really. I wish you all success, I want to ask you be more fair next time, Thank-you, I will not do edit in such articles again, because right

1818:

the problem. I have no problem with others want to work with him, figure out a topic ban or other solution, and have any admin unblock based on those determinations. As a matter of fact, I encourage it strongly. His behavior at the ANI and clear indication he wouldn't discuss there but just give

747:

I just wanted to apologize for implying on that DNS/attack stuff the other day. I am doing preliminary sockpuppet research, and I needed to know who was watching me, (and it was successful in doing so). The Iran talk page just happened to be a convenient cover, so for that I am sorry - but you did

3016:

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find

1792:

I feel that I am the primary advocate for action against KhabarNegar's disruption. The ban certainly solves my issues. However, if someone wants to take responsibility for his edits, I would be comfortable with no block nor topic ban and heavy mentoring. The pact would be something like, if he is

1765:

the block was excessive. A topic ban would have accomplished the same palliative result at the articles under dispute and would have given KhabarNegar plenty of room to gain experience and recognition for his positive contributions here. Moreover, regardless of their concerns, the editors really

2134:

If I tried to edit that article in first place the reason was because, I really had tried to give some information I thought maybe you guys don’t know, I’m not that much interested any politic the reason I start to make Sanctions against Iran more neutral because actually something happened as a

1670:

you see all that is said. Anything else? I think I do understand the things mattered to the admin. As I have had good faith, so I think I just should quit editing in the specific articles… And that is Understand… & learn. I in fact have good faith when I do edited here, but I can understand

347:

side, if not it actually makes others confused. If that country name is Iran so where is Persia! If that language is Persian so what’s the different between Persian and Farsi? Anyway, thank you so much for spending time and make the world aware of our honorable history and culture. Best Regards,

4221:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4327:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

5789:- if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so: 4010:

It for sure was changed, but anyway, as the edit is hidden right now, Please make it back here, and then I will be able to rewrite and put it back in the article then. Or at least make a subsection on the talk page of the article so I rewrite the texts once more and make more

5834:

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

5782:

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

5838:

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

3857:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1905:

Doc James has shown an interest, I will happily leave to him. I do think that the disruption needs to be addressed by the editor themselves and they need to at least understand and be able to articulate the concerns, but I will leave that to him.

751:

When I am done with this, I look forward to helping you work on this article, inshāllā. I have been near Khorramshahr, (and got stuck in the swampy sand a few times). Someday I would like to visit the place my Tree of Life silk rug comes from ;)

2135:

result of this sanctions and I saw there is no mention of these effects of sanctions in the article (just right now as they are removed by you :)) I really don’t care that much about Knowledge (XXG) articles being neutral and complete…, AND

2891: 1729:

and has never been blocked before. Looks like the issues primarily relate to middle east politics. A topic ban of 6 month to a year widely construed would likely have been sufficient. But than again maybe I am overly optimistic.

2527:

I concur with Ed and Bbb3. KhabarNegar it's simply never a good idea to try to clerk or administer areas related to your own restrictions. Just please do not do it. Let the admins (or others) do that. Please just leave your

173: 5382: 4598: 4355: 4249: 3885: 3367:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3003: 2052:

Tippy, Khabar is unable to contribute to this article due to the topic ban he is under. Maybe in 6 month or a year he can apply to have this lifted. I consider the topic ban to also apply to the talk pages.

701:

I see your name listed on our project page as the Persian lead integrator - nice to meet you. :) I was wondering if you had some time to look into the integration of the completed Persian translations of

3081: 4582:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4339:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4233:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3869:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 148: 1990:

If he wishes to edit medical content in English I will be happy to help with guidance. Requirements include paraphrasing (copy and pasting not allowed), and high quality sources must be used per

193: 3582:. The article cites multiple reliable sources that say he became a Sunni Muslim. There is no policy or guideline that requires a citation quoting Malcolm X himself saying he was a Sunni Muslim. 703: 2150:

If you review the record, I hope you will find that none of my assertions were any sort of USA vs Iran thing. I object mostly on technical reasons. Sources convince me, not reasoned arguments.

2430:

I didn't do anything wrong, Please do a double check, & tell me if you got what I mean. someone else changed that, I did revert the change. I will put changes here, in a minutes. Regards,

2220:

I have unblocked this user per the discussion above and with the restrictions mentioned. I will keep this talk page watched and if further issues occur please leave me a note on my talk page.

178: 1173:

See comments on why it is edit warring and why you don't understand point that this is a descriptive term, not the accepted one by pro-property libertarians. Discuss there, not here. Thanks.

3035:! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed! 1406:

a productive way, but I feel I have no choice but to block here. Any admin is free to modify this block as they see fit without my prior permission, although a note afterwards is requested.

183: 4568: 1260:

I also gave you an alert on your talk page, for deleting sourced parts of the article and placing your own view which have no source. Read the alert and always remember that to yourself.

1198:

I am going to take you for an admin decision on this. so you may keep more calm next time, and learn how to not bite anyone. This is the history as anyone can see no Edit war happened(1-

2856: 2352: 212: 5238: 163: 2536:. If your request is reasonable it'll be done, no problem, and there will be no concerns that an editor is trying to modify text regarding their own restrictions. Thanks... 143: 630: 2441:

You should not be editing your own entry at all, even if you think it is a mistake. You can easily request an admin or an uninvolved editor to fix any problems that you see.

2501:

I reverted your last change before I read this discussion. My reaction was the same as Ed's. You shouldn't be touching this. However, I have looked back at the history, and

1317: 591:

Some more articles have been translated and are ready for upload to the Persian wiki. I tried to upload it myself but my Persian wikicode skills are horrible. 4 are waiting

3546: 3535: 188: 158: 4760:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

4707:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

4654:

You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by

632:

I have added a recently translated article to the talk page. Wondering if you can integrate it into the main article and drop me a note when you are done. Many thanks

3090: 1961:

This is the ideal solution. James, thank you for offering. Dennis, thank you for working on this, it's a tough situation with nothing but tough decisions to make.

3659: 3648: 5190: 153: 3715: 3704: 97: 1574:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

168: 3962: 3966: 3605:

I really don't care what you like to put in that article, I did not do any disruptive editing, & now I just put links here so other people can judge.

2277:

now & from now on, I am sure, or lets say I am not sure if there is everything goes fair, I wish That you all keep up with positive energy, Regards,

1876:

address the concerns and agree to whatever terms Doc James puts on him, if any. I won't interfere with that process, although I am willing to help it.

5684: 2944:

from Rubric who's joined us here at Knowledge (XXG). We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

2513:, probably for clerical reasons). Frankly, I don't think it matters whether the language is there or not, but I'd rather let Zad68 make the decision.-- 1210:

That is all and nothing else, no other revert or something by anyone actually you deleted sourced parts of article). Plus Talk Page used before my edit

3978:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 138: 5588: 5533: 5286: 4998: 4950: 4854: 4525: 4514: 4459: 4448: 4426: 4415: 2262: 1921: 1891: 1841: 1421: 1394: 1618: 1474: 62: 103: 3414: 3403: 237: 4144:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

2667: 2038:

would benefit from your input. If you have suggestions or sources, please take them to my talk page. I would love to rebuild our relationship.

1793:

objectively disruptive and ignores the mentor, we revisit the ban. Any volunteers? I'd love to (and tried to) but I'm sure he hates me by now.

4039: 4028: 1559: 1376: 4521: 4488: 4455: 4422: 4389: 4283: 4177: 4101: 4068: 4035: 3919: 3810: 3777: 3744: 3711: 3655: 3542: 3509: 3476: 3443: 3410: 3322: 3240: 3214: 3176: 2834: 2829:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2794: 2789:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2754: 2749:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2714: 2709:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2326: 2321:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 956: 951:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 789: 784:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 5046: 4620: 4369: 4263: 4072: 4061: 3899: 3392: 3213:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 3175:. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at 2968: 3447: 3436: 2258: 1917: 1887: 1837: 1417: 1390: 4141:

tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you please include details of the location, especially the country, and more references.

3685: 1613: 1469: 780: 768: 3210: 3172: 2830: 2790: 2750: 2710: 2412: 2405: 2322: 1144: 952: 785: 48: 4644: 5863: 365:

I want to add the source you provided is respected by me, what I'm talking is about something which should happen, Do you agree?

3244: 3233: 2820: 2780: 2740: 2700: 2312: 2124:(I was going to send it after first sentence by TippyGoomba but it looks like 3 more edits are before me, I'm not read them yet) 1009: 942: 775: 92: 5478: 4616: 4365: 4259: 3895: 3388: 476:

Hello, I receive a message in my Talk page in Fa.Knowledge (XXG) is that you? The page he asked me to review, is complete now.

4591: 4348: 4242: 4138: 3878: 1156: 1112: 206: 3595: 2993: 2983: 2660: 2653: 1987:

He is free to revert obvious vandalism (we really need more people doing this and I see many example of him doing this well)

1360: 1160: 242: 83: 3076:

We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages!

2958: 2373: 1826:

only for as long as was needed. If people can get him to engage here and find a solution, nothing would make me happier.

611: 592: 530: 491: 5142: 2631: 2590: 2387: 2233: 2177: 2107: 2094:

Yes that would be fine. If you are happy with him leaving comments on your talk page I would not have an issue with it.

2066: 2009: 1948: 1743: 895: 676: 645: 572: 545: 505: 462: 430:, I really admire you, because you always provide the source of your sayings, I always try to do the same too. Regards, 3981: 3379:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1675:(The user which filled the AnI), to know more if I am a disruptive editor, or I always have Good faith about anything. 1447: 1348: 1166: 4603: 4360: 4254: 3890: 3384: 1590: 1441: 1108: 996:

Good article. Remember to separate the different points in your article using sections. Makes it a lot easier to read

4105: 4094: 2988: 3326: 3315: 2973: 2953: 1984:

He will not edit any articles related to politics (that includes all articles about countries and religious groups)

1446:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3954: 1632: 1488: 1228: 1152: 1124: 1104: 117: 4697: 2635: 2594: 2391: 2237: 2181: 2111: 2070: 2013: 1952: 1747: 1520: 899: 729: 680: 649: 576: 549: 509: 466: 4579: 4336: 4230: 3866: 3209:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 3171:. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see 2355:. I see some articles there with completed status, what can I do to finalize them for Persian Knowledge (XXG)? 1819:

the one long tirade of diffs (many of which didn't prove his points) pretty much demanded this. Again, it was

721:. Regrettably, I cannot (yet) read in your beautiful language to check if integration has been completed... ;) 710:, so that I can send you the target files for integration, in case you don't have access to the TwB Workspace. 2247:

Thanks Doc, that seems to have worked out for the best, hopefully it will. I appreciate the time invested.

1062: 982: 3958: 2940:

has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and

1195: 4902: 4750: 3146: 2978: 2825: 2813: 2254: 2035: 1913: 1883: 1833: 1413: 1386: 1180: 3380: 2963: 1148: 1116: 73: 5094: 4131: 3693: 2941: 2194: 2155: 2085: 2043: 1966: 1798: 1325: 757: 5843: 4149: 3748: 3737: 3273: 3032: 2529: 88: 4181: 4170: 3164: 3157: 2705: 2693: 2446: 2420: 2360: 2317: 2305: 1089: 4562: 4323: 4217: 3853: 3835: 3356: 3347: 3923: 3912: 2933: 2916: 1860: 1774: 725: 219: 5745: