User talk:Lar/Archive 8

3471:

assertions that I've been unacceptable. If you'll notice, after I explained my position GENERALLY, without any personal attacks on the author of the article or any contributors, Trialsanderrors jumped in, accusing me of getting into "fights" and making "flying accusations of xenophobia." Surely, when such offensive terms as xenophobia are brought into a debate, there has to be some reason, since merely bringing up the word raises the bar of the argument. Trialsanderrors didn't seem to have a reason. When I responded to Trialsanderrors' surprisingly persistent attacks, he then accused me of not assuming good faith in others. Hypocritically, even though he lectured me on how I fell "afoul" of rules regarding the discrediting of others' opinions, he simultaneously attmempted to discredit my opinions. In any case, since the article was ultimately deleted, I was obviously ultimately correct in marking it for deletion, so I shouldn't be accused of inappropriate and unacceptable conduct. Also, considering that our disagreement was really fairly calm and proper, and I tried to make my responses as erudite and reasonable as possible, I think that your threats and declamations were inappropriate. Blintz 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

3517:

assumed bad faith from other EDITORS when they initiated conflicts by attacking me. In any case, if you'll examine the record, initially, I offered the article up for deletion. I doubt that my comments were offensive, since I was merely describing what most agreed was an absurd article to begin with. You're right: I didn't assume good faith in the hostile editors. Do you know why? Trialsanderrors brought up xenophobia and myriad other loaded terms to try to discredit me. What reasonable person would continue to assume good faith in the face of that? As far as I understand, I'm being accused not of not acting in good faith, but of not assuming good faith in others. Well, if that's true, then Trialsanderrors is equally culpable for not assuming good faith in my actions. As well, I'm bothered by your (and Trialsanderrors's) insistence on ending every missive with militaristic comments threatening that I'm being watched, and will be blocked if my behavior continues, and variations on that including "out of line", &c. From your language, I doubt that you assume good faith in my actions, and so are equally in violation of that rule if I am.

3527:

written by the article's subject, gossipy, inappropriate" is full of loaded words. Better to just say "non notable actor" and leave it at that. Your next comment includes "clear pro-Asian bias", which is clearly assuming bad faith. Pro asian bias is a pejorative term. Your next comment starts out "Because, Gong,"... well the user you were replying to is "Hong Qi Gong", not "Gong". It is incivil to use less than the full userID unless you already have a friendly relationship with the user. I am not going to go on because I can find something incivil, incollegiate or inappropriate in every single one of your posts to that AfD. Please change your ways. Also, "militaristic" is itself not assuming good faith, I am an admin. Warning people is part of what I do. Please do not continue to edit tendentiously.

3621:

a project already I guess). It is as easy to put things at the very top as it is to put them at the very bottom. What is harder is to put them in the middle. The script just leaves you in edit mode, so you could easily move it by hand if you wanted (and if you were editing the whole page... it works if you use whole page, edit section 0 or + to add a new section). I could have it ask top or bottom, I guess and then place it at the top or bottom of whatever section it is in. In any case, article regulars could still move it to wherever they wished afterwards. (note that in your specific example placing it at the bottom of section 0 is exactly the right thing to do, and it's doable because the previous users, after adding a project box,

3408:

attacks. I only generally opined that partisans of various topics tend to jealously oppose the deletion of articles under their "protection"; I intended to allow readers to make their own decisions in the face of controversy. Trialsanderrors chose to eschew the approach that Wikipedians supposedly pride themselved on - rational argument toward a common resolution - instead provocatively trying to reprimand me for my "attacks". That's like launching a military offensive while screaming "self-defense!" That's all: I don't think that I did anything wrong, and if I was perhaps a little offensive, it was only in response to Trialsanderrors's clumsy attacks.

3756:, the template is only broken in as much as unclassified articles by importance aren't appearing in the unclassified category. All other cases should work. Since that's not really the biggest of deals, I think it would be a wiser use of time to leave it for now, until we know if Mathbot will be upgraded to support our other ideas (which might require named args and an AWB run). Unless you can fix my current solution I say leave it as is for now. I'll now proceed to rank the importance of some or of the articles which have quality assessments at 3186:

spotted the other one before I remembered that thanks to you messing up the order, I had to work the other way around, still on balance I found the other one more interesting). Sonoma falls, great pic so saved for another DYK, Railsback too technical and uninteresting, Cockshoot, dictdef and not much more, Szeged public transport, taken, Alex K, I am not going to pick an article that is being fought over that way, Coldplay taken, Csect, not very interesting, Saugumas, again, an article under some controversy till Piotr and Ghirla settle down.

3902:. It went through Afd and was decided as a redirect on May 30. The original author ignored the Afd and restored the page after the closing admin redirected it. A few people including me objected (and reverted) based on the Afd and suggested that he follow procedure if he wanted the page back to the original content. After some grumbling and dramatics (and recreating the page under a slightly different title) he finally agreed and asked me what the correct procedure was. At which point I became somewhat unsure as to whether 3555:

in my explanation. How can that be offensive? There's such a thing as being TOO even-handed. And do you really think that abbreviating "Hong Qi Gong" to "Gong" is offensive to anyone? Of course I don't assume that you're acting in good faith: you called me "out of line" and "inappropriate" and made various threats about watching and blocking me, as well as generally ignoring my arguments with bland threats and questionable citations of rules. You don't like "militaristic"? Check a thesaurus!

3291:. Do you agree that it has no basis or not? I have provided justification for why I did not choose the articles I did not choose for the days in question, when I actually did not need to. I don't recall your entire pick set ever getting such scrutiny. If you don't agree that your complaint is baseless, and further, that you were out of line in your comment on the template talk page, and that you should remove it, I suggest you just drop it. 2889: 3826:

page of the destination article so that people are aware you want to "unmerge"... you may find supporters or folk that have good insights to share with you. I'd probably actually do that first, to gather input, before I carried out the recreation or raised the issue on DRV. Hope that helps and happy editing! Remember, all my view, not necessarily Offical Policy... What article is it, by the way?

4062:, along with me :) Whilst you pointed out you wanted a more experienced (I have done one coaching so far) admin on your first assignment I thought we'd make a suitable pair. Your answer to RFA Q1, despite being in the same format, was basically the opposite of mine in content. So I should be to cover the RC/vandal fighting deletionist stuff while you can be the article/general wise person type. 1672:]? ... he's now been warned. If he does not reply to that warning (or perhaps to the NEXT warning, maybe 2 warnings is where to be rather than just the one?) and continues to upload images I'd give a short block and then document on his user page and AN/I. Short enough to not be punitve but long enough given his usage pattern that it gets his attention. see where the dialog goes. We must 3427:, something lacking from the above post as well as from the AfD discussion, your denials notwithstanding. I'm not going to debate this further, because this is not a debate. Rather, if I see this pattern continue, I will ask for another opinion to validate my thinking, and then block. Knowledge does not need unfriendly, incivil or aggressive contributors. Please don't be those things. 2598:

right. I think switching back, and then back again in 6 hours, is a good approach. A note saying that's what is up near the refresh clock might be a good thing so that another admin doesn't tangle things up more by doing another refresh by accident. I'll go add a note to that effect. PS, you may want to work on your terseness in messages, it comes off as a wee bit uncivil at times.

3692:

thrown on the talk page without arguments, and the article hasn't been assessed for either quality or importance yet). If you look at the history you'll see I thought I had it, but tests suggest a missing argument is not treated the same as an empty argument in "switch". Net result: presently articles which use the template without arguments will be appearing in

3821:

once (maybe edit the text offline or in a sandbox and replace the redirect with the fully formed new article, rather than working incrementally). The history will show the old stuff too, which is fine. If on the other hand, if you think the consensus was somehow wrong, or procedurally majorly flawed (don't sweat the small stuff, we're not that

2097:

all. For all I know, and he hasn't been back to tell either of us otherwise, he doesn't mind if people know where his archives are. It isn't like he has deleted the pages, and I was only using a template that he made up for use on his other pages. Be what may though we will have to wait till he comes back to tell us otherwise.

3657:

all users will leave a nice neat section heading after a project or announcement box. Not meaning to be difficult, but a script like this needs to work without having to cut and paste things about afterwards. I suspect the solution probably lies in some clever regex manipulation, something else I know almost nothing about ...

1963:

guideline. Tag it as proposed, have a few people you know take a look, get it smithed, then announce it on VP and on WP:CORP and a few other places and see what happens. There's an page somewhere on how policy gets made that discusses this process. I think I may have it linked in my useful links on my user page.

4036:

And no matter what the episode is going to air in Augast or Spetember of 2006! Now, that's two-three months away. What do I need to see above? And this matter was already taken care of, the outcome was that I wasn't going to fiddle with the page anymore, and I'd slow down on making edits because I am

3526:

You had been warned on your talk page twice by the time I, the closing admin, turned up. Both warnings, as well as the one I added, were civil and polite, in contrast to your comments on the AfD page, starting with the very first one, the nomination, which was in pejorative terms. "Self-aggrandizing,

3488:

I am sorry, but I do not agree. Your word choices were inappropriate, you failed to be collegial and to assume good faith, and you went over the line. You've now been warned, you need to take that warning on board, and you're being watched. If your behaviour continues this way, you'll be blocked, and

3407:

I apologize if my generalizations offended anyone, but I really protest the heavy-handedness with which you and "Trialsanderrors" attempted to condemn me. As I said, Trialsanderrors brought a quiver of loaded terms with him including "accusations", "xenophobia", and others. I didn't make any personal

2737:

I really don't know where it's going. If you think you grok where it's headed, feel free to jump in. Somehow, I'd like to address the problem that we have an inscrutable "culture" here that people either "get" the way a fish gets swimming, or knock their heads against it again and again. I tend to

2597:

The refresh clock said something well over 10 hours and a quick check of the history of the template iteself missed the time of last update... I certainly didn't intend to shortchange those articles, and never would have done an update (which I had to cram into my lunch hour...) if the clock were set

54:

I recognize that this user page belongs to the Knowledge project and not to me personally. As such, I recognize that I am expected to respectfully abide by community standards as to the presentation and content of this page, and that if I do not like these guidelines, I am welcome either to engage in

4501:

Please do not assume I'm trying to accuse you of ignorance. I say this without intending to offend you, but I simply don't see anywhere in the deletion process that gives admins the latitude to take the action you have when closing a deletion. If such policy exists, I would appreciate you advising

4461:

Mike, I've read it, believe me. Go take a look at my RfA and tell me that I'm a shoot from the hip guy. Please don't try to accuse me of ignorance.... This was a tough one and I consulted with several other admins in IRC to seek opinions before deciding. The one keep was much stronger of an argument

4328:

when I first saw it (tagged speedy) it didn't make any clear assertion to be related to anything else; it read as vandalism/dangerous (naming "DAVID BLUNKETT" for instance). AIH I'd already opened the page and was reviewing it when you made your edit, so I failed to see your addition. Given there is

3825:

in general) or there is new information supporting notability, and your desire is to essentially recreate the old article, then DRV is indeed the right place to raise it. State your goal as a recreation and demerge so people know what you intend. In either case, I'd ALSO raise discussion on the talk

3691:

Hi Lar. I've attempted to upgrade the template to cover article importance too, as Mathbot now picks those categories up. I think I've nailed it, with one exception: where both parameters are missing (i.e. there's no argument 1 saying "redirect" or "category" or such like; the template has just been

3620:

You have a lot of JS though... you must know some stuff, or did you crib it all from someone else? Most of mine is cribbed! On article talk pages my thinking is that most articles will not have many, or any, other announcement boxes (how could it be a good article already?... although it COULD be in

3554:

I'm noticing a serious urge to censor coming from you and other editors around WP. Yes, I possibly could have said "non-notable" actor, but since I was deleting a ludicrous article that was practically a personals page (the other editors agreed with at least 3 out of my 4 criteria), I felt justified

1884:

I don't think its particularly necessary as PatCheng and RevolverOcelotX from the pro-CCP side are sitting on 24hrs for NPA and 3RR respectively and I've locked the pages anyway. Basically, there is a large debate on my talk page that you can read if you want but those two and TJive and YINever seem

4117:

Yeh I'm IRC sometimes as well (when my stupid internet connection doesn't keep dropping my link to it). The fact that you've replied now and Condem also lives in the UK is a good sign for us being able to meet up there. We can work out details after Condem says hi, and I've finished assigning all I

4076:

blessed assignment or ? If unofficial maybe Tito needs to be told so someone else isn't assigned? I'm afraid I've been a bit unclear how the coording of assignments was actually co-orded... BTW I am on IRC sometimes, maybe we should huddle a bit there too... Also feel free to email me, my mail link

3174:

I stand by my decisions. It's not a strict order selection. Those articles, in my judgement, were not as good choices. Let's take a look here, although I owe you no explanations, and really, you should do something about the issues I've raised, and your intemperate remarks instead of questioning my

2510:

for the category. Your suggestions are something I'd like to see discussed further, perhaps you might want to raise them at that page? As for a formal request within current process for removal of adminship I am not aware of one. It's been discussed (it seems a perennial topic) but as far as I know

2308:

It should be noted that the churn of that set of DYK's may have contributed. I updated 2 hours after Brian did (because the clock wasn't changed and I didn't think to check the history of the template itself) so that set came, went back to the old set, then came again... But if we're only outraging

2096:

I am not one to revert anothers edits without reason, however, I do think that you may have misunderstood based on your edit summaries. Aaron has 7 archives which have each been quite neatly stored away by moving the page to start each archive. I was not trying to influence his archiving choices at

1951:

Thanks for your comments Lar, I think we are close to a consensus on the subject of chapter notbility, now we need to find a consensus on many other issues. I was wondering is it appropriate to actually create a policy through the consensus of the project members. With fraternities and sororities

3820:

This is my opinion only. If the material you are thinking of creating is substantially new and you're sure the article would survive an AfD if it were brand new (it's verifiable, notable, NPOV, etc), be bold and create the article at the current redirect, probably doing as much of it as you can at

3656:

Hehe, my first thoughts? - call Lupin, kind of a ghostbusters solution. All of my stuff is cribbed with some minor personal customisations. My JS knowledge is enough for me to understand what's going on, but not to actually do much from scratch. Section 0 might be a start to cracking this, but not

3516:

All right, I don't wish to argue this point further either. However, since you continue to threaten and condemn me, I don't consider this resolved. What word choices did I make that were appropriate? Again, I never insulted or assumed bad faith in the author of the article under review, and I only

3356:

User:Blinz has been warned about his apparent repeated personal attacks in this nomination discussion. Such personal attacks and vexatious discussion are not acceptable. Although "Man Who Survived Suicide via Jesus" and "Boy Pet" are no doubt interesting roles, sufficient notability has not, in my

2707:

I've been to Kim's page and agree. He's a good person to chat with on IRC if you ever get a chance... usually goes by Kim_Register. I think that I have a few good links on my user page too, essays and suchlike, check them out (Thought Provoking Essays and Neat Links section in the last show/hide).

1835:

A bit stuck with the DYKs at the moment and will be having research proposal due soon. A bit transfixed with trying deletion/blocking but it may wear off but it is very boring - I think that gives me incentive to nominate lots of NP patrollers for RFA. Also I have stumbled into a mess for blocking

1659:

This user is 10 years old and all they do is edit their user page and upload unsourced images - just check out the talk page! I'm thinking they should come back in a year, but I thought I'd run it by another admin before asking on ANI. If you shoot me down as a heartless old b*stard then I'll drop

1134:

Sorry, I missed this one, there was a flurry of traffic. Yes, I agree, under the connotation that you hire/fire, that's a bad badging. Anyway, Lead is perfectly fine, and accurately describes the role. You performed it admirably for the last issue, if I may say so. I hope you choose to do so again

4127:

Titoxd blessed!!! cool! :) I'm in the US and am at work as I speak, where are you? Most of my IRC time is late at night in whatever timezone I am in at the time. I went to Condem's page and heartily concur, a subpage to keep it all straight seems a good idea. I have seen other coaches give people

3594:

which already have some sort of announcement box PLUS some discussion. As I read it, the script will place the DYK box at the end of the page, after the discussion (correct me if I'm wrong), but I think the normal practice would be to place it after the original announcement boxes, but before the

4525:

By the way, Lar, thanks for recently expressing in an AfD discussion what (I think) a lot of us have been feeling about a certain individual's habit of jumping on or having to comment on any dissenting views from his own. The lengths he's gone recently over perceived slights from other users in

3185:

June 8 - Cochneal ineligible, Drago ineligible, Vindaloo, short and not very referenced, Maraba, taken, Mrinalini Sarabhai, I already had selected an Indian article by then that I felt was more interesting (I work from the bottom up, to match the template list order, as I've explained, and had

1962:

I think a guideline for just fraternities is too narrow. BUT maybe a guideline for "ORG" might be a good thing if one does not already exist. I suggest getting consensus on your project first, then when you are ready, (after searching to see if a similar one does not already exist) create the

3470:

Lar, you're being very heavy-handed here. I'll admit that I made the comment (about partisans of subjects jealously preventing articles under their "protection" from being deleted) sarcastically and that some could choose to take offense, but I haven't done anything to deserve your constant

4285:

I had that func. loaded as per main() but it was written in SRC from warning tabs, which was odd, so I moved it to my main javascript. Since yours was a copy of mine (unlike the other people, so they didn't notice), it also had that func. in main(), yet the SRC it write from no longer had

1910:

I'm currently in a heated discussion over at the Fraternities wikiproject that is actually very constructive and I think will lead to a consensus on the inclusion (or not) of articles on individual fraternity/sorority chapters. I don't need your help in resolving this because I think an

3417:

I'm sorry, I did not see it that way. I had no horse in this race prior to closing the AfD but when I read it I was struck by your incivility, apparent assumption of bad faith and incollegiality, which is present in your message above as well. Further, in reviewing the contributions of

3723:

I know how to code named arguments. Let me try to take a look at the template (probably tonite) first though as that would be a spot of bother to change round even with AWB... I'll have to read up on switch... I'll check to see if you've sussed it first though before I start.

3751:

It probably wouldn't be too hard with AWB, as only articles which currently have arguments would need to be changed. I could certainly code a solution, but it would be ugly repetitive code, as I don't see any "and" statements and the like. I think named args might be better.

4136:

is a great resource) and ask WHY are they written the way they are and what does it mean to how one should conduct one's self... to me it's not so much about the tools as about how to approach doing things, and the wikiway of how process gets created and consensus reached.

2199:

regarding an image of an eyeball !!! If and when the time comes to update and it's a candidate image, it'll go on the page if it's the best one, then we can have some more squeamish outrage. Did you get my mail BTW, it's a new WP only account which I haven't used much yet.

4405:

Hi Mike, and thanks for letting me know. I think that the one keep was quite convincing because... we don't count noses. I don't think any of the deletes were made in bad faith... But I look forward to input from my peers which will make me a better admin.

2249:

Yes, thanks so MUCH for those images, mate. Based on your input I ended up selecting the image for the main page... I squeezed that update in on my lunch hour, almost didn't make it, hope I didn't miss a step somewhere, as I was late for a concall/meeting.

3270:

I complained about your selecting articles that were only a day old. These are unrelated. I still see selecting entries so completely out of order as cutting in line, but feel free to continue, it's only my opinion. And I still never called you a dick. —

3218:

I did not call you a dick. I couldn't tell if you were trying to be one, so I just said you should feel free to be one, if you wish. I don't really care why you decided to use my exact opposition against my own nomination, but I did find it amusing. —

4128:"homework problems" to make them think about situations... but I wonder if just talking through things is a good way to go. Assign some essays that are good (I am partial to the ones linked from my user page, especially Mindspillage's... also 3712:

appears to be working, but it's a bit easier as I don't replace "article" with an optional argument 1 like "category" or "template" there; I just use an argument 1 with value "x" to say "this is not an article, don't process the logic".

2485:? I think that it would be interesting to see how many admins would be willing to make it easier for the community to review their actions. That said, is there any formal place where one can requests admin to be stripped of their rank?-- 3035:

They're sort of neat but I probably will go back to square ones... A tweak I'd like to do is to remove some of the whitespace to right and left of the words or chars in the tabs, so I can squeeze more tabs in without scrolling though.

2505:

now) and it met with considerable resistance... some good objections were raised. But I still think the idea has merit, although the objections DO need to be addressed somehow. There is additional discussion at the category talk page

1952:

notability is a bit weird. It's academia, but I ended quoting a of WP:CORP guidelines to support my views. Would creating a new set of guidelines work? If so, what is the process to all this? Can we really create a "WP:FRAT?"

2028:

Don't worry about WP:ORG. I'm still looking around at how other people have done notability guideline proposals. I should have something in a day or two. Our consensus is sound I just need to put it down with better words.

3422:

in the discussion I saw no such incivility or assumption of bad faith. If you want to be an effective and successful wikipedian you would be wise to temper your words, and temper them a lot. In addition, you really need to

4249:, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. 4194:

Awesome, I have watchlisted it. Further I am considering making some reading suggestions if that would be useful, although it probably would pay to wait to see what you think your own strengths and weaknesses are.

2784:

That is a good link. I think I'll get in touch with Kim. Thanks for not announcing the page; there's really nothing there yet, and I want to shape it a little more before setting it free. Hence the name: /Temp.

3590:. I haven't tested it yet, but it looks like it will be very useful. From a quick read, the only possible issue I can see is on article talk pages which already have content. I often encounter talk pages such as 3906:

was the right place to go or not, so I asked a few admins (you, Stifle and Zoe) for their opinions. (In hindsight I probably shouldn't have gotten involved in this to begin with, but that's a separate issue) --

4181:

to coordinate the coaching, so if you put it on your watchlist, that would be great. I'll put something up there tomorrow about what i'm hoping to get out of the process, and where I need help. Thanks again!

2952:

It's 146k plus images, mate. If I knew what the "please archive" template was called I would have added it by now too! Some of the threads at the top date back to mid May and seem to be finished, zap em! :P

3379:

Corrected the user name (I couldn't sleep so decided to close a few... maybe not a perfect idea), and have warned the user referencing your previous warning. Thanks for your correction and happy editing!

3063:

Scrolling? My problem is that extra tabs get cut off to soon (IE does not have this). The element of the div, p-cactions, is being treated as if it is longer than it really is, so extra tabs get cut off.

1708:

Well it's a copyright image, it has to be removed, it's as simple as that. I wouldn't block at this stage (assuming s/he is an otherwise useful editor). Maybe just rm the image and see what happens? --

3182:

June 7 - Cornish Holocaust, not eligible, Perihan Magden, you point out issues with it, Now that I've found you, you point out issues with it. Assize, I found uninteresting. It's your article though.

1840:

for NPA - it has lead to a few of his mates and enemies (who POV edit-war without discussion on Falungong and Chinese Communist Party stuff) arguing on my talk page trying to get me to ban the other!

2309:

one editor maybe we're slipping. Note that Samir is standing for Admin and I commented on his pics there. And as for the image qualms, I think I need to figure out how to use the lead image from

1911:

understanding is just around the corner, but I would like your help in trying to set a deletion/inclusion policy in stone. You're an admin and a wonk at that, some help would very appreciated.

1164:

I will happily do it again, but I would like to keep the position open in case anyone else fancies having a go. Should it be that time again in the month without a lead I will take up the reins.

3972:

I tend to agree with that opinion, but processwise, if the editor does not agree, I think DRV is the place to bring it, preceded by discussion on the "list of" page (the merge target). Agree?

1996:... we created standards for our project that are more restrictive. We can't enforce them except by asking for concurrence but our articles are all moving in the more standardised direction. 2920:

I archive every couple weeks and try to keep 2 weeks of discussion still on the page... it's not quite time yet theoretically. Thanks for the WP birthday wish and the reminder though!

3853:

Can you tell us what article you're talking about? I would have to know the history of the AfD discussion and see what sort of content you plan on re-adding to remove the redirect.

3190:

I also note that you have called me a dick. That's not very civil of you and I feel you need to strike that and apologise for that remark. Really, you need to work on your civility.

1992:

PS, you can just create a guideline that applies to your project. It may not carry as much weight, and it cannot contravene existing policy, but it can be an elaboration of it. See

2751:

which I think has a great deal of bearing on your temp essay. You should invite him to take a look and share his thoughts. I'm loathe to anonunce your essay where I saw the link

123: 2738:

think some of our customs could be better explained, and we could be a bit smarter about where misunderstandings are likely to occur, and deal with them before they turn ugly. -

2708:

I'm a student of comunity so that last notion is not foreign to me by any means... That temp essay is a good start, did you want others in on it yet or work alone for a while?

1325:

I can try, but I am at a client this week during the day so may not see stuff... maybe ask others to keep an eye out too??? what are the pages? those user pages or any others?

4329:

so little content, and what is there could be misconstrued, I'd suggest that this information would be better served as a para in the article on the micronation concerned. --

3806:

If an article went on Afd and consensus was to redirect to another article, what's the best place to go for a user afterwards to get the page reinstated? For deleted pages

3489:

at that point I'll put the block up for review and other admins will get the chance to decide who is out of line and who isn't. I'm not going to argue this point further.

1295:

Hey, Larry, got a favor to ask... I'm headed out of town tomorrow for a week and won't be around to monitor a few pages I've semi-protected due to repeated sock vandalism:

3769:

Right, that's what I am saying, I will see if I can fix it without introducing named args unless you yourself have in the meantime fixed it, and if not, leave it for now.

76:. Please do not comment here, use my current talk page for that, thanks. It is part of a series of archives, see the box at right for the list and to navigate to others. 4377: 4108:

to do assigning :) I'm working on assigned all the coaches available (there was more than I thought!). I'll then update the lists, so there shouldn't be any duplication.

2511:

the only way now existing is to raise an ArbComm case. That seems such an unpleasant and heavyweight process... its part of the motivation for wanting to try this out.

4438: 4389: 2502: 3239:

basically it is accusing the person of being one, read the talk including the history. Now, do you admit that your complaint here about what I selected has no basis?

4133: 3625:

a section heading there for section 0 to end neatly... if you have the edit top enhancement, editing section 0 is dead easy.) So... some ideas there. Thoughts?

4441:. With respect, I believe your decision was made in error, and urge you to respect the consensus — not even rough — displayed by the voters in the article. — 2811: 2697:

has a very good user page, with links that are worth following. I think we'll need to become Wiki-sociologists or something to fly this rig with any finesse. -

1855:

No worries, mate, do you need some help somewhere? Want me to pop in on some articles? I fly to Minneapolis tomorrow nite but can look in if you want me to...

1921:

I put my oar in, LMK if there was more you wanted me to do specifically... I do think you guys are quite close to the right answer already, as I said there.

3128:

Mostly I picked older ones. I did not feel the entries of 7 and 8 June were suitable. I picked Antares for balance reasons, it was the last entry picked.

4246: 4227: 4037:

fed up with Knowledge at the present time. If you notice my edit count today has been less than others though I have logged in once in a while to edit.

4392:. I do not believe that, as an admin, you have the right to completely toss out seven of the nine votes cast, none of which were made in bad faith. — 2866:

Hello friend, Larry Pieniazek. I wish you a very happy wiki-birthday, this day one year before you did your first edit. BTW, I learnt of the same from

1670:

You're a heartless old bastard all right... But I wouldn't drop it, you're on the right track. (I'm a heartless old bastard too, you know). See this:

1056: 3865:

I'm curious about that too, but I think my comments about the process are correct regardless of what the article itself is. What do you think, Zoe?

3350: 1549: 2470: 2640:

Congratulations on a year of editing Knowledge, and may your next year here be as enjoyable and productive as this one has been! Your WikiTwin,

1676:

but this is not myspace and we are not a babysitting service. those are my thoughts. What do you think? PS, what do you think of THIS exchange:

1623: 1490: 3015:

One note but dropdowns and CSS is that corner rounding gets sr*wed up. My own CSS fixes that if you like (and I very much do) rounded corners.

3086: 2498: 2546:

Do you realize you refreshed the DYK only 2 hours after I did? Those editors' articles need to get more face-time before getting ditched. —

3693: 2902: 2392:

LEGO sculpture tends to be quite expensive... also flesh toned bricks are fairly rare in large quantities. I've been involved in sculpture

1358:

Just the four user pages above. You won't have to do anything other than remove the tags in a few days... no need to monitor them. Thanks.

109: 3155:

It doesn't seem fair to the older articles, which might get tossed out if they're not used in the next day. It's like cutting in line. —

2474: 1311:. The tags only need to be up around three to five days; would you mind unprotecting them at that time? Gracias primo, I appreciate it. 3899: 3697: 1586: 1449:

Lar, hi. I'd like to ask your opinion on a post I'm hesitating over. Do you mind if I email you with a request for your thoughts? -

3959:

As long as it hasn't aired, it shouldn't be recreated. Afterwards, I guess it can have an article like all of the other episodes.

2634: 1280: 1679:(go back a few diffs to see the start, he changed what he said a bit...) on IRC the thinking varied among block and warn some more 4264: 2507: 2478: 3092:

An RfC has been opened concerning Dr1819s behavior surrounding men's fashion articles. Since you had reported the behavior to

2752: 2482: 1617: 116: 2469:

This page seems like a good candidate for something that should be more known. Perhaps this should be formulated as a part of

2051:

good deal. After you've had a few more people put their oar in, you may want to announce at VP (and maybe at the talks for

4072:

Works for me, I think you're spot on with how our skills/interests dovetail, and I look forward to it! Is this an official

4268: 2192: 1255: 80: 4325: 3810:

would be the right place, but since the page wasn't actually deleted I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. --

4388:

keep very clearly shows a consensus — not even a "rough" one — that the article should be deleted. I refer you to

4178: 2832: 2455:

I think it is a worthy notion, and I have added it to my page, too. I would like to suggest the following changes:

1507: 4481: 4425: 4357: 4214: 4156: 4096: 4028: 3991: 3951: 3884: 3845: 3788: 3743: 3644: 3546: 3508: 3446: 3399: 3310: 3258: 3209: 3147: 3055: 2983: 2941: 2776: 2729: 2689:...and I'm still thinking about all of these things. I wanted to drop you a link to an essay I'm roughing up at 2619: 2532: 2417: 2334: 2271: 2140: 2090: 2080: 2017: 1984: 1942: 1876: 1823: 1794: 1738: 1700: 1530: 1480: 1429: 1400: 1346: 1211: 1156: 84: 2221: 3591: 3587: 1022: 1012: 1002: 992: 982: 963: 953: 943: 933: 923: 904: 894: 884: 874: 864: 854: 844: 834: 824: 814: 804: 794: 775: 765: 755: 745: 735: 725: 715: 705: 695: 685: 675: 665: 646: 636: 626: 616: 606: 596: 586: 576: 566: 556: 546: 536: 517: 507: 497: 487: 477: 467: 457: 447: 437: 427: 417: 407: 397: 387: 377: 367: 348: 338: 328: 318: 308: 298: 288: 278: 268: 258: 248: 238: 4009:). You need to gain consensus there to overturn the previous outcome. See above for process. Hope that helps. 1231:

Congrats to you! I know you'll use your admin powers well. Glad to hear of someone who knows some Turcottes.

1032: 2962:

Maybe... and maybe your puny girlyman computer just isn't powerful enough to handle this awesome page, dude.

2449: 1647: 1308: 1275: 1265: 228: 208: 198: 188: 178: 168: 158: 148: 40: 28: 1459:

No, I would be happy, heck, flattered even, to give you advice! My mail link is all set up, fire away ...

4288: 2810: 1629: 1566: 1270: 1300: 1093:

that "Hires and Fires") as unworthy - considering what was happening. I, too, subscribe to the policy of

4469: 4464: 4413: 4408: 4345: 4340: 4202: 4197: 4144: 4139: 4084: 4079: 4016: 4011: 3979: 3974: 3939: 3934: 3872: 3867: 3833: 3828: 3776: 3771: 3731: 3726: 3632: 3627: 3534: 3529: 3496: 3491: 3434: 3429: 3387: 3382: 3298: 3293: 3246: 3241: 3197: 3192: 3135: 3130: 3043: 3038: 2969: 2964: 2927: 2922: 2817: 2762: 2757: 2748: 2715: 2710: 2676: 2656: 2605: 2600: 2518: 2513: 2403: 2398: 2320: 2315: 2257: 2252: 2126: 2121: 2103: 2066: 2061: 2003: 1998: 1970: 1965: 1928: 1923: 1892: 1862: 1857: 1847: 1809: 1804: 1780: 1775: 1724: 1719: 1686: 1681: 1635: 1516: 1511: 1466: 1461: 1415: 1410: 1386: 1381: 1332: 1327: 1197: 1192: 1142: 1137: 2356:, can you do me a LEGO version of that, something to stick above my fireplace to outrage visitors with 3370:

Maybe someone other than me should issue the warning since I'm fairly sure Blintz will ignore mine. ~

2888: 2673: 2665: 1496:

Exactly how is that article "too political" or slanted to be pro-Patriot Act? Genuinely interested. -

4260: 3671: 3609: 3419: 3371: 2851: 2831:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on 2370: 2294: 2238: 2210: 1497: 4507: 4442: 4393: 3822: 1296: 3325: 3278: 3226: 3162: 3118: 2867: 2690: 2668: 2651: 2641: 2586: 2570: 2553: 2460: 2188: 2172: 1887: 1842: 1763: 1611: 1165: 1126: 1116: 1051: 3932:

for DRV may be a good place to seek additional input or summarise what gets talked through here.

3929: 3685: 1360: 1313: 1304: 3700:. Can you fix it? Or, should we move to named arguments and if so do you know how to code them? 3367: 4526:

remarkable, and I'm glad someone called him on it. Kudos! (and a Snickers, while I'm at it...)

3287:

Bias? What are you referring to? Who said antying about bias? I say your complaint here has no

4527: 3065: 3017: 2489: 2441: 1993: 1717:

It's been sorted, apparently Durin cleaned them all out. I had meant to but he beat me to it!

1379:

I read that way too fast, my bad. Sure I can unprotect them then, no worries... Happy trails.

1260: 1232: 1125:

I've unwatched this page - so if you do wish to respond please do so on my talk page. Cheers.

4237: 3111:

was only created yesterday, and you skipped over nearly all the entries from June 7 and 8. —

2393: 4129: 4051: 3596: 2823: 2694: 2350: 2108: 4314:

people who are allowed to call me a bitch and get away with it, but not generally on WP! --

1802:

PS it was really well referenced! the best referenced article I saw of the ones I checked.

4255: 4224: 3662: 3600: 2842: 2361: 2285: 2229: 2201: 2119:

He and I have been in communication offline all along and I have asked for clarification.

2042: 2030: 1953: 1912: 1190:

shall be doing it!"... anyway, yes, support keeping it open til the last sec this time...

55:

reasonable discussion about it, to publish my material elsewhere, or to leave the project.

2158: 1583:

please send your prefer login-name, your realname and the public part of your ssh-key to

3999:

Lar, where do I ask about the page being recreated? I am ForestH2 not logged in though.

4119: 4063: 3706: 3320: 3273: 3236: 3221: 3157: 3113: 3093: 2786: 2739: 2698: 2581: 2565: 2548: 2281: 2196: 2052: 1758: 1450: 2755:

as that may be way way premature plus it's your gig not mine. Hope that's of some use

4503: 4477: 4421: 4381: 4370: 4353: 4210: 4152: 4092: 4038: 4024: 4006: 4000: 3987: 3964: 3947: 3903: 3880: 3858: 3841: 3807: 3784: 3761: 3757: 3739: 3714: 3640: 3542: 3504: 3442: 3424: 3395: 3306: 3254: 3205: 3143: 3051: 3002: 2979: 2954: 2937: 2772: 2725: 2615: 2528: 2413: 2330: 2267: 2136: 2076: 2038: 2013: 1980: 1938: 1872: 1837: 1819: 1790: 1734: 1709: 1696: 1673: 1661: 1526: 1476: 1425: 1396: 1342: 1207: 1178: 1152: 1109:, being fully aware of the extent of my ego, and prefer to simply consider myself as 65: 17: 2224:

are much better cheeks (IMHO), but wouldn't cause quite so much outrage I think ...

4330: 4315: 3916:(Note: my reply got lost due to edit conflict the first time, sorry about that) -- 2912: 2871: 2486: 2438: 2396:

before but not quite like that one. So, maybe. How much were you looking to spend?

1563: 1250: 4272: 2563:

I've switched it back to the originals, and will switch it to yours in 6 hours. —

4183: 4171: 4073: 4059: 3917: 3908: 3811: 3556: 3518: 3479: 3409: 3363: 2169: 2098: 2056: 1111: 4462:

to me than the several deletes as I said in DRV. Let's continue this there ok?

3179:

June 5 - two totally uninteresting articles, you yourself question one of them

2155: 1249:

Congratulations on becoming an administrator! I really think you deserve it.

4530: 4513: 4484: 4448: 4428: 4399: 4360: 4333: 4318: 4300: 4217: 4188: 4159: 4122: 4099: 4066: 4031: 3994: 3966: 3954: 3920: 3911: 3887: 3860: 3848: 3814: 3791: 3764: 3746: 3717: 3676: 3647: 3614: 3559: 3549: 3521: 3511: 3482: 3449: 3412: 3402: 3374: 3313: 3261: 3212: 3150: 3097: 3077: 3058: 3029: 3005: 2986: 2957: 2944: 2915: 2874: 2856: 2828: 2789: 2779: 2742: 2732: 2701: 2679: 2659: 2644: 2622: 2535: 2491: 2443: 2420: 2375: 2337: 2299: 2274: 2243: 2215: 2177: 2143: 2113: 2083: 2045: 2033: 2020: 1987: 1956: 1945: 1915: 1895: 1879: 1850: 1826: 1797: 1741: 1712: 1703: 1664: 1593: 1590: 1571: 1533: 1500: 1483: 1453: 1432: 1403: 1366: 1349: 1319: 1285: 1239: 1214: 1181: 1168: 1159: 1129: 1119: 1094: 1885:

to be strolling around WP reverting everything they can get their hands on.

1585: 4473: 4417: 4349: 4206: 4148: 4088: 4020: 3983: 3960: 3943: 3876: 3854: 3837: 3780: 3735: 3636: 3538: 3500: 3438: 3391: 3302: 3250: 3201: 3139: 3047: 2975: 2933: 2827:, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the 2768: 2721: 2611: 2524: 2409: 2326: 2263: 2132: 2072: 2009: 1976: 1934: 1868: 1815: 1786: 1730: 1692: 1522: 1472: 1421: 1392: 1338: 1203: 1148: 2633: 3108: 1756:

Ugh, I can't believe you picked that Fiona Apple item... so dull. :) —

1090: 973: 914: 785: 656: 527: 358: 139: 3096:, you may wish to review or comment on the issue. Thank you. Shell 2310: 1089:

Goodness Gracious! I was referring to the title "Editor in Chief" (A

2579:

I guess I'm partly to blame for not updating the refresh clock :) —

3475: 1173:

Absolutely! If there's any hiring or firing to be done round here,

1069:

All dates approximate, conversations organised by thread start date

79:

An index to all my talk page archives, automatically maintained by

2649:

Congratulations on a happy year Lar. All the best and keep it up.

2168:

I see no problem doing so. Feel free to do it any time you wish.

1135:(although if you want to take a break for 003 that makes sense!) 4439:

Knowledge:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough consensus

4390:

Knowledge:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough consensus

1605: 4310:

Thanks for your action on my userpage and such ... there are a

3318:

Ha! Too many hours on the computer, I'm falling asleep here. —

2693:, an optimistic title, I suppose. I also just discovered that 4177:

Hi there, thanks for agreeing to admin coach me. i've created

3357:

view, been established. --++Lar: t/c 07:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

3266:

Bias? I didn't notice your comment about my nomination until

2041:, it's up, take a look and let me know what you think of it. 2632: 4338:

Yep. Let's let that one lie and see what the editor does.

3001:

Lar, your recent strange comment replied on my userpage.

3595:

start of discussion. I'm no javascript guru, more of an

2753:

Knowledge:Village_pump_(policy)#Three_Levels_of_Audience

4437:

You don't count noses, but please read the material at

4105: 3622: 2497:

Hi! The category and ideas behind it were mentioned at

1677: 1653: 1641: 4384:. Six deletes, one merge/delete, one transwiki, and 4502:me of same. But, as you said, continuing this in 4378:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lost: The Journey 4245:Hello Lar, and thank you for your support at my 1559:Your support means loads, Lar! Thanks so much. 3698:Category:Unassessed-importance Beatles articles 3362:Not sure if it matters, but the user name is 2459:replace the WP:RFC link with a more specific 2437:For the info, it looks mostly ok to me now.-- 1589:. I will create your account soon then :). -- 117: 8: 2461:WP:RFC/ADMIN#Use_of_administrator_privileges 1097:, and do not like promoting myself as being 1042: 3107:Why did you pick very new entries for DYK? 2508:Category_talk:Administrators_open_to_recall 2465:ArbCom is usually spelled with a single 'm' 283:1 September 2006 through 15 September 2006 4005:Before the episode airs? Deletion Review ( 2883: 2821:has been updated. A fact from the article 2805: 124: 110: 4236: 1037:1 January 2023 through 1 January 2025 ?? 392:1 February 2007 through 15 February 2007 343:1 December 2006 through 15 December 2006 333:15 November 2006 through 1 December 2006 323:1 November 2006 through 15 November 2006 293:15 September 2006 through 1 October 2006 3476:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Blintz 3351:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong 1007:1 December 2016 through 1 December 2018 997:1 December 2013 through 1 December 2016 987:1 December 2012 through 1 December 2013 899:1 November 2010 through 1 December 2010 879:1 September 2010 through 1 October 2010 770:1 November 2009 through 1 December 2009 750:1 September 2009 through 1 October 2009 641:1 November 2008 through 1 December 2008 621:1 September 2008 through 1 October 2008 512:1 November 2007 through 1 December 2007 492:1 September 2007 through 1 October 2007 382:15 January 2007 through 1 February 2007 353:15 December 2006 through 1 January 2007 313:15 October 2006 through 1 November 2006 273:15 August 2006 through 1 September 2006 2664:Happy WikiBirthday, congratulations. -- 2471:Knowledge:Administrator Code of Conduct 1017:1 December 2018 through 1 January 2021 928:1 January 2011 through 1 February 2011 909:1 December 2010 through 1 January 2011 889:1 October 2010 through 1 November 2010 869:1 August 2010 through 1 September 2010 799:1 January 2010 through 1 February 2010 780:1 December 2009 through 1 January 2010 760:1 October 2009 through 1 November 2009 740:1 August 2009 through 1 September 2009 670:1 January 2009 through 1 February 2009 651:1 December 2008 through 1 January 2009 631:1 October 2008 through 1 November 2008 611:1 August 2008 through 1 September 2008 541:1 January 2008 through 1 February 2008 522:1 December 2007 through 1 January 2008 502:1 October 2007 through 1 November 2007 482:1 August 2007 through 1 September 2007 372:1 January 2007 through 15 January 2007 303:1 October 2006 through 15 October 2006 2893: 2870:. All the best for the coming year! -- 1491:USA PATRIOT Act, Title III, Subtitle B 1105:, f'chrissake!) I am not the type for 1027:1 January 2021 through 1 January 2023 402:15 February 2007 through 1 March 2007 50: 3087:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/Dr1819 2747:Kim came up with another great link: 2499:Knowledge talk:Requests for adminship 2487:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2439:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 938:1 February 2011 through 1 March 2011 809:1 February 2010 through 1 March 2010 680:1 February 2009 through 1 March 2009 551:1 February 2008 through 1 March 2008 263:1 August 2006 through 15 August 2006 7: 3694:Category:Unassessed Beatles articles 4380:was in error, and have appealed to 2475:Knowledge:Discussions for adminship 968:1 May 2011 through 1 December 2012 432:15 March 2007 through 1 April 2007 412:1 March 2007 through 15 March 2007 253:15 July 2006 through 1 August 2006 3900:Treehouse (Drake and Josh episode) 948:1 March 2011 through 1 April 2011 859:1 July 2010 through 1 August 2010 819:1 March 2010 through 1 April 2010 730:1 July 2009 through 1 August 2009 690:1 March 2009 through 1 April 2009 601:1 July 2008 through 1 August 2008 561:1 March 2008 through 1 April 2008 472:1 July 2007 through 1 August 2007 24: 3599:, so no idea how to sort that. -- 2749:WikiWikiWeb:ThreeLevelsOfAudience 243:1 July 2006 through 15 July 2006 233:15 June 2006 through 1 July 2006 223:1 June 2006 through 15 June 2006 4376:I believe that your handling of 4232: 2887: 2809: 2479:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 2284:. Still, that's a good thing. -- 1584: 958:1 April 2011 through 1 May 2011 849:1 June 2010 through 1 July 2010 829:1 April 2010 through 1 May 2010 720:1 June 2009 through 1 July 2009 700:1 April 2009 through 1 May 2009 591:1 June 2008 through 1 July 2008 571:1 April 2008 through 1 May 2008 462:1 June 2007 through 1 July 2007 442:1 April 2007 through 1 May 2007 213:15 May 2006 through 1 June 2006 153:start through about 22 Jan 2006 4326:Lovely Election Candidates 2006 2483:Knowledge:Village pump (policy) 1101:than my peers (two of whom are 839:1 May 2010 through 1 June 2010 710:1 May 2009 through 1 June 2009 581:1 May 2008 through 1 June 2008 452:1 May 2007 through 1 June 2007 203:1 May 2006 through 15 May 2006 193:15 Apr 2006 through 1 May 2006 183:1 Apr 2006 through 15 Apr 2006 163:22 Jan 2006 through 1 Mar 2006 1059:(27 Dec 2005) through present 422:Trentino — South Tyrol topics 173:1 Mar 2006 through 1 Apr 2006 1: 2833:the "Did you know?" talk page 1599:What do you think about this? 2886: 4058:I've assigned you to coach 3898:The article in question is 2897:This talk page is becoming 2197:this ludicrous "discussion" 2187:Hehe, it was really just a 977:My post 2012 archived talk 918:My 2011/2012 archived talk 90: 81:User:HBC Archive Indexerbot 4546: 4179:User:Condem/Admin coaching 3235:No, whenever anyone cites 2149: 1508:Template talk:Did you know 4531:04:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 4514:03:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 4485:03:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 4449:03:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 4429:03:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 4400:03:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 4361:22:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 4334:22:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 4319:21:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 4301:01:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 4273:05:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 4218:01:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 4189:00:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 4160:20:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 4123:20:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 4100:19:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 4067:19:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 4032:22:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3995:16:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3967:16:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3955:16:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3921:15:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3912:15:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3888:15:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3861:15:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3849:15:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3815:15:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3792:13:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3765:13:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3747:13:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3718:12:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3677:15:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3648:14:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3615:09:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3560:23:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 3550:01:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 3522:23:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 3512:11:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 3483:05:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 3450:11:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3413:05:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 3403:07:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3375:07:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3314:03:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3262:03:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3213:02:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3151:02:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 3098:01:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 2091:User talk:Aaron Brenneman 1773:I liked it. Tastes vary. 1045: 976: 917: 788: 659: 530: 361: 142: 98: 85:User:Lar/TalkArchiveIndex 4382:WP:DRV#Lost: The Journey 3588:User:Lar/DYK/monobook.js 3078:21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 3059:20:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 3030:20:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 3006:17:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 2987:17:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2958:17:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2945:13:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2916:13:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2875:13:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2857:11:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2790:15:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 2780:15:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 2743:20:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2733:12:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2702:05:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2680:08:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2660:05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2645:00:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2623:20:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2536:19:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2492:18:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2444:18:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2421:18:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2376:17:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2338:17:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2313:in a DYKable article... 2300:16:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 2275:19:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2244:11:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2216:11:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2178:22:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 2159:15:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 2144:10:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 2114:09:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 2084:20:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2046:20:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2034:05:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 2021:12:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 1988:12:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 1957:07:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 1946:12:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1916:07:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1896:06:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1880:04:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1851:04:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1827:00:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1798:00:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 1742:18:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 1713:16:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1704:15:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1665:15:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1594:15:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1572:04:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1534:12:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1501:11:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1484:04:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1454:04:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1433:14:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1404:21:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1367:20:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1350:19:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1320:17:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1286:16:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1240:16:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 1215:18:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1182:16:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1169:16:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1160:15:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1130:15:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC) 1120:15:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 2450:User:Lar/Accountability 1545:Thanks for your support 1309:User talk:Tijuana Brass 1186:Er, I think you meant " 4077:is set up correctly. 3582:DYK template insertion 3103:DYK for 10 Jun evening 2637: 789:My 2010 archived talk 660:My 2009 archived talk 531:My 2008 archived talk 362:My 2007 archived talk 143:My 2006 archived talk 64:This is an archive of 4247:request for adminship 3586:Hi Lar, nice work on 2636: 1177:shall be doing it! -- 4239:File:Motherussia.jpg 3420:User:Trialsanderrors 1555:Wise I'll try to be. 4251:For Mother Russia!! 4223: 4170:Admin Coaching for 3928:Note also that the 3802:Article Un-redirect 2868:Knowledge:Esperanza 2862:Happy wiki-Birthday 2691:User:GTBacchus/Temp 2629:Happy WikiBirthday! 2282:one outraged editor 2154:You've got mail. -- 1301:User talk:Kevin1243 3686:Template:WPBeatles 3330:• 2006-06-11 03:46 3283:• 2006-06-11 03:11 3231:• 2006-06-11 02:50 3167:• 2006-06-11 02:17 3123:• 2006-06-11 02:11 2901:. Please consider 2638: 2591:• 2006-06-07 20:23 2575:• 2006-06-07 20:20 2558:• 2006-06-07 20:19 2473:, or mentioned at 2311:this article(NSFW) 2280:Pretty poor, only 1768:• 2006-06-04 23:45 1305:User:Tijuana Brass 101:Talk Page Archives 4278: 4277: 4271: 3474:(Retrieved from " 3425:assume good faith 3331: 3284: 3232: 3168: 3124: 2909: 2908: 2880:In case, you wish 2839: 2838: 2592: 2576: 2559: 1769: 1540:A haiku of thanks 1078: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1063: 1062: 1041: 1040: 972: 971: 913: 912: 784: 783: 655: 654: 526: 525: 357: 356: 134: 133: 4537: 4467: 4411: 4343: 4297: 4294: 4291: 4259: 4242: 4240: 4233: 4200: 4186: 4142: 4130:User:NoSeptember 4082: 4014: 3977: 3937: 3870: 3831: 3774: 3729: 3711: 3705: 3674: 3669: 3630: 3612: 3607: 3532: 3494: 3432: 3385: 3328: 3319: 3296: 3281: 3272: 3244: 3229: 3220: 3195: 3165: 3156: 3133: 3121: 3112: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3041: 3026: 3023: 3020: 2972: 2967: 2930: 2925: 2891: 2884: 2854: 2849: 2813: 2806: 2765: 2760: 2718: 2713: 2695:User:Kim Bruning 2671: 2657:Have your say!!! 2608: 2603: 2589: 2580: 2573: 2564: 2556: 2547: 2521: 2516: 2406: 2401: 2373: 2368: 2323: 2318: 2297: 2292: 2260: 2255: 2241: 2236: 2213: 2208: 2175: 2150:You've got mail. 2129: 2124: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2069: 2064: 2006: 2001: 1973: 1968: 1931: 1926: 1906:Some help please 1893:Have your say!!! 1865: 1860: 1848:Have your say!!! 1812: 1807: 1783: 1778: 1766: 1757: 1727: 1722: 1689: 1684: 1658: 1657: 1624:deleted contribs 1608: 1588: 1569: 1519: 1514: 1469: 1464: 1418: 1413: 1389: 1384: 1363: 1335: 1330: 1316: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1258: 1253: 1245:Congratulations! 1237: 1200: 1195: 1145: 1140: 1043: 974: 915: 786: 657: 528: 359: 140: 126: 119: 112: 96: 95: 92: 91: 83:can be found at 48: 47: 4545: 4544: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4465: 4409: 4374: 4341: 4308: 4295: 4292: 4289: 4283: 4281:changemovetab() 4238: 4231: 4198: 4184: 4175: 4140: 4080: 4056: 4012: 3975: 3935: 3930:discussion page 3868: 3829: 3804: 3772: 3727: 3709: 3703: 3689: 3672: 3663: 3628: 3610: 3601: 3584: 3530: 3492: 3430: 3383: 3372:trialsanderrors 3346: 3326: 3294: 3279: 3242: 3227: 3193: 3163: 3131: 3119: 3105: 3090: 3072: 3069: 3066: 3039: 3024: 3021: 3018: 3013: 2999: 2970: 2965: 2928: 2923: 2882: 2864: 2852: 2843: 2804: 2763: 2758: 2716: 2711: 2687: 2669: 2631: 2606: 2601: 2587: 2571: 2554: 2544: 2519: 2514: 2453: 2435: 2404: 2399: 2371: 2362: 2321: 2316: 2295: 2286: 2258: 2253: 2239: 2230: 2211: 2202: 2185: 2173: 2166: 2152: 2127: 2122: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2094: 2067: 2062: 2004: 1999: 1971: 1966: 1929: 1924: 1908: 1863: 1858: 1810: 1805: 1781: 1776: 1764: 1754: 1725: 1720: 1687: 1682: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1601: 1579: 1567: 1552:, which passed! 1542: 1517: 1512: 1498:Ta bu shi da yu 1494: 1467: 1462: 1447: 1416: 1411: 1387: 1382: 1361: 1333: 1328: 1314: 1293: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1233: 1229: 1198: 1193: 1143: 1138: 1087: 1046:RfA Thank Yous 130: 103: 58: 45: 44: 37: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4543: 4541: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4432: 4431: 4373: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4307: 4304: 4282: 4279: 4276: 4275: 4243: 4230: 4225:CrazyRussian's 4222: 4221: 4220: 4174: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4106:Titoxd blessed 4055: 4052:Admin coaching 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3914: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3851: 3803: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3688: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3651: 3650: 3583: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3472: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3345: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3188: 3187: 3183: 3180: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3104: 3101: 3089: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3012: 3009: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2907: 2906: 2892: 2881: 2878: 2863: 2860: 2837: 2836: 2814: 2803: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2686: 2685:Got your email 2683: 2642:Kirill Lokshin 2630: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2594: 2593: 2577: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2467: 2466: 2463: 2452: 2447: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2303: 2302: 2247: 2246: 2195:comment about 2184: 2181: 2165: 2164:Admin Coaching 2162: 2151: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2093: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 1949: 1948: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1600: 1597: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1557: 1556: 1553: 1546: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1493: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1353: 1352: 1297:User:Kevin1243 1292: 1289: 1246: 1243: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1179:Dick Dastardly 1171: 1166:LessHeard vanU 1127:LessHeard vanU 1117:LessHeard vanU 1086: 1083: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1029: 1028: 1025: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1009: 1008: 1005: 999: 998: 995: 989: 988: 985: 979: 978: 970: 969: 966: 960: 959: 956: 950: 949: 946: 940: 939: 936: 930: 929: 926: 920: 919: 911: 910: 907: 901: 900: 897: 891: 890: 887: 881: 880: 877: 871: 870: 867: 861: 860: 857: 851: 850: 847: 841: 840: 837: 831: 830: 827: 821: 820: 817: 811: 810: 807: 801: 800: 797: 791: 790: 782: 781: 778: 772: 771: 768: 762: 761: 758: 752: 751: 748: 742: 741: 738: 732: 731: 728: 722: 721: 718: 712: 711: 708: 702: 701: 698: 692: 691: 688: 682: 681: 678: 672: 671: 668: 662: 661: 653: 652: 649: 643: 642: 639: 633: 632: 629: 623: 622: 619: 613: 612: 609: 603: 602: 599: 593: 592: 589: 583: 582: 579: 573: 572: 569: 563: 562: 559: 553: 552: 549: 543: 542: 539: 533: 532: 524: 523: 520: 514: 513: 510: 504: 503: 500: 494: 493: 490: 484: 483: 480: 474: 473: 470: 464: 463: 460: 454: 453: 450: 444: 443: 440: 434: 433: 430: 424: 423: 420: 414: 413: 410: 404: 403: 400: 394: 393: 390: 384: 383: 380: 374: 373: 370: 364: 363: 355: 354: 351: 345: 344: 341: 335: 334: 331: 325: 324: 321: 315: 314: 311: 305: 304: 301: 295: 294: 291: 285: 284: 281: 275: 274: 271: 265: 264: 261: 255: 254: 251: 245: 244: 241: 235: 234: 231: 225: 224: 221: 215: 214: 211: 205: 204: 201: 195: 194: 191: 185: 184: 181: 175: 174: 171: 165: 164: 161: 155: 154: 151: 145: 144: 136: 135: 132: 131: 129: 128: 121: 114: 106: 104: 99: 89: 72:through about 62: 60: 51: 46: 38: 33: 26: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4542: 4533: 4532: 4529: 4515: 4511: 4510: 4505: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4486: 4483: 4479: 4475: 4472: 4471: 4468: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4440: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4430: 4427: 4423: 4419: 4416: 4415: 4412: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4397: 4396: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4372: 4368: 4362: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4348: 4347: 4344: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4332: 4327: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4317: 4313: 4305: 4303: 4302: 4299: 4298: 4280: 4274: 4270: 4266: 4262: 4258: 4257: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4235: 4234: 4229: 4226: 4219: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4205: 4204: 4201: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4187: 4180: 4173: 4169: 4161: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4147: 4146: 4143: 4135: 4134:Admin Project 4131: 4126: 4125: 4124: 4121: 4118:can! Cheers, 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4107: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4087: 4086: 4083: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4065: 4061: 4053: 4050: 4040: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4019: 4018: 4015: 4008: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3965: 3962: 3957: 3956: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3942: 3941: 3938: 3931: 3922: 3919: 3915: 3913: 3910: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3889: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3859: 3856: 3852: 3850: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3836: 3835: 3832: 3824: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3813: 3809: 3801: 3793: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3779: 3778: 3775: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3734: 3733: 3730: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3716: 3708: 3701: 3699: 3695: 3687: 3684: 3678: 3675: 3670: 3667: 3660: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3649: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3635: 3634: 3631: 3624: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3613: 3608: 3605: 3598: 3593: 3589: 3581: 3561: 3558: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3487: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3433: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3411: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3386: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3353: 3352: 3343: 3329: 3324: 3323: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3301: 3300: 3297: 3290: 3286: 3285: 3282: 3277: 3276: 3269: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3245: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3230: 3225: 3224: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3200: 3199: 3196: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3166: 3161: 3160: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3122: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3102: 3100: 3099: 3095: 3088: 3085: 3079: 3076: 3075: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3046: 3045: 3042: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3010: 3008: 3007: 3004: 2996: 2988: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2956: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2932: 2931: 2926: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2890: 2885: 2879: 2877: 2876: 2873: 2869: 2861: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2847: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2825: 2824:Heraldo Muñoz 2820: 2819: 2818:Did you know? 2815: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2801: 2791: 2788: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2767: 2766: 2761: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2714: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2678: 2675: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2635: 2628: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2604: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2585: 2584: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2568: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2517: 2509: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2490: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2464: 2462: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2432: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2408: 2407: 2402: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2377: 2374: 2369: 2366: 2359: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2339: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2319: 2312: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2301: 2298: 2293: 2290: 2283: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2256: 2245: 2242: 2237: 2234: 2227: 2223: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2214: 2209: 2206: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2182: 2180: 2179: 2176: 2171: 2163: 2161: 2160: 2157: 2145: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2125: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2092: 2089: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2071: 2070: 2065: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2022: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2002: 1995: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1969: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1955: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1914: 1905: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1839: 1838:User:PatCheng 1834: 1833: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1808: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1762: 1761: 1751: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1723: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1630:nuke contribs 1628: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1607: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1587: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1565: 1560: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1515: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1499: 1492: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1465: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1444: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1414: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1385: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1362:Tijuana Brass 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1331: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1315:Tijuana Brass 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1226: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1196: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1141: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1108: 1107:false modesty 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1084: 1082: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1044: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1004: 1001: 1000: 996: 994: 991: 990: 986: 984: 981: 980: 975: 967: 965: 962: 961: 957: 955: 952: 951: 947: 945: 942: 941: 937: 935: 932: 931: 927: 925: 922: 921: 916: 908: 906: 903: 902: 898: 896: 893: 892: 888: 886: 883: 882: 878: 876: 873: 872: 868: 866: 863: 862: 858: 856: 853: 852: 848: 846: 843: 842: 838: 836: 833: 832: 828: 826: 823: 822: 818: 816: 813: 812: 808: 806: 803: 802: 798: 796: 793: 792: 787: 779: 777: 774: 773: 769: 767: 764: 763: 759: 757: 754: 753: 749: 747: 744: 743: 739: 737: 734: 733: 729: 727: 724: 723: 719: 717: 714: 713: 709: 707: 704: 703: 699: 697: 694: 693: 689: 687: 684: 683: 679: 677: 674: 673: 669: 667: 664: 663: 658: 650: 648: 645: 644: 640: 638: 635: 634: 630: 628: 625: 624: 620: 618: 615: 614: 610: 608: 605: 604: 600: 598: 595: 594: 590: 588: 585: 584: 580: 578: 575: 574: 570: 568: 565: 564: 560: 558: 555: 554: 550: 548: 545: 544: 540: 538: 535: 534: 529: 521: 519: 516: 515: 511: 509: 506: 505: 501: 499: 496: 495: 491: 489: 486: 485: 481: 479: 476: 475: 471: 469: 466: 465: 461: 459: 456: 455: 451: 449: 446: 445: 441: 439: 436: 435: 431: 429: 426: 425: 421: 419: 416: 415: 411: 409: 406: 405: 401: 399: 396: 395: 391: 389: 386: 385: 381: 379: 376: 375: 371: 369: 366: 365: 360: 352: 350: 347: 346: 342: 340: 337: 336: 332: 330: 327: 326: 322: 320: 317: 316: 312: 310: 307: 306: 302: 300: 297: 296: 292: 290: 287: 286: 282: 280: 277: 276: 272: 270: 267: 266: 262: 260: 257: 256: 252: 250: 247: 246: 242: 240: 237: 236: 232: 230: 227: 226: 222: 220: 217: 216: 212: 210: 207: 206: 202: 200: 197: 196: 192: 190: 187: 186: 182: 180: 177: 176: 172: 170: 167: 166: 162: 160: 157: 156: 152: 150: 147: 146: 141: 138: 137: 127: 122: 120: 115: 113: 108: 107: 105: 102: 97: 94: 93: 88: 86: 82: 77: 75: 71: 67: 66:User talk:Lar 61: 57: 56: 49: 42: 36: 30: 19: 18:User talk:Lar 4528:MikeWazowski 4524: 4508: 4463: 4443: 4407: 4394: 4385: 4375: 4339: 4311: 4309: 4287: 4284: 4256:CrazyRussian 4254: 4250: 4196: 4176: 4138: 4078: 4057: 4010: 3973: 3958: 3933: 3927: 3866: 3827: 3805: 3770: 3753: 3725: 3702: 3690: 3665: 3658: 3626: 3603: 3585: 3528: 3490: 3428: 3381: 3355: 3348: 3347: 3344:Blinz/Blintz 3321: 3292: 3288: 3274: 3267: 3240: 3222: 3191: 3189: 3173: 3158: 3129: 3114: 3106: 3091: 3064: 3037: 3016: 3014: 3000: 2963: 2921: 2919: 2910: 2898: 2894: 2865: 2845: 2840: 2822: 2816: 2756: 2709: 2688: 2663: 2650: 2648: 2639: 2599: 2582: 2566: 2549: 2545: 2512: 2501:(in archive 2468: 2454: 2436: 2397: 2364: 2357: 2351: 2314: 2288: 2251: 2248: 2232: 2225: 2204: 2186: 2167: 2153: 2120: 2095: 2060: 2037: 2027: 1997: 1964: 1950: 1922: 1909: 1886: 1856: 1841: 1803: 1774: 1759: 1755: 1718: 1680: 1650: 1644: 1638: 1632: 1626: 1620: 1614: 1602: 1580: 1561: 1558: 1510: 1506:Answered at 1495: 1460: 1448: 1409: 1380: 1359: 1326: 1312: 1294: 1291:Favor to ask 1248: 1235:Mr. Turcotte 1234: 1230: 1191: 1187: 1174: 1136: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1088: 1080: 1068: 218: 100: 78: 74:15 June 2006 73: 69: 63: 59: 53: 52: 34: 4506:is fine. — 4324:Oh, and re 4172:User:Condem 4074:User:Titoxd 4060:User:Condem 3597:untouchable 3364:User:Blintz 1581:Hello Lar, 1112:complicated 1052:RFA Archive 70:1 June 2006 68:from about 4369:Listed on 3368:User:Blinz 2895:Important: 2043:Dspserpico 2031:Dspserpico 1994:WP:Beatles 1954:Dspserpico 1913:Dspserpico 1648:block user 1642:filter log 1577:Toolserver 1115:...*grin* 1033:Archive 84 1023:Archive 83 1013:Archive 82 1003:Archive 81 993:Archive 80 983:Archive 79 964:Archive 78 954:Archive 77 944:Archive 76 934:Archive 75 924:Archive 74 905:Archive 73 895:Archive 72 885:Archive 71 875:Archive 70 865:Archive 69 855:Archive 68 845:Archive 67 835:Archive 66 825:Archive 65 815:Archive 64 805:Archive 63 795:Archive 62 776:Archive 61 766:Archive 60 756:Archive 59 746:Archive 58 736:Archive 57 726:Archive 56 716:Archive 55 706:Archive 54 696:Archive 53 686:Archive 52 676:Archive 51 666:Archive 50 647:Archive 49 637:Archive 48 627:Archive 47 617:Archive 46 607:Archive 45 597:Archive 44 587:Archive 43 577:Archive 42 567:Archive 41 557:Archive 40 547:Archive 39 537:Archive 38 518:Archive 37 508:Archive 36 498:Archive 35 488:Archive 34 478:Archive 33 468:Archive 32 458:Archive 31 448:Archive 30 438:Archive 29 428:Archive 28 418:Archive 27 408:Archive 26 398:Archive 25 388:Archive 24 378:Archive 23 368:Archive 22 349:Archive 21 339:Archive 20 329:Archive 19 319:Archive 18 309:Archive 17 299:Archive 16 289:Archive 15 279:Archive 14 269:Archive 13 259:Archive 12 249:Archive 11 239:Archive 10 4120:Petros471 4064:Petros471 3754:That said 2903:archiving 2899:very long 2829:Main Page 2787:GTBacchus 2740:GTBacchus 2699:GTBacchus 2200:Cheers.-- 2183:DYK image 1752:Fiona DYK 1660:it! :) -- 1654:block log 1606:Mannyjr95 1451:GTBacchus 1227:Congrats! 1095:concensus 1085:Un/worthy 229:Archive 9 219:Archive 8 209:Archive 7 199:Archive 6 189:Archive 5 179:Archive 4 169:Archive 3 159:Archive 2 149:Archive 1 41:Archive 9 35:Archive 8 29:Archive 7 4265:contribs 4039:ForestH2 4001:ForestH2 3961:User:Zoe 3855:User:Zoe 3762:kingboyk 3715:kingboyk 3696:but not 3175:picks. 3003:Ukrained 2955:kingboyk 2652:Blnguyen 2394:projects 1888:Blnguyen 1843:Blnguyen 1710:kingboyk 1662:kingboyk 1618:contribs 1057:Howcheng 4331:AlisonW 4316:AlisonW 3237:WP:DICK 3109:ANTARES 3094:WP:PAIN 2997:comment 2913:Bhadani 2872:Bhadani 2360:-o ? -- 2055:and at 2053:WP:CORP 1091:Fat Cat 4504:WP:DRV 4371:WP:DRV 4185:ConDem 4054:Condem 4007:WP:DRV 3918:Hirudo 3909:Hirudo 3904:WP:DRV 3812:Hirudo 3808:WP:DRV 3758:WP:TBA 3664:Cactus 3602:Cactus 3557:Blintz 3519:Blintz 3480:Blintz 3410:Blintz 3366:, not 3349:From: 2844:Cactus 2363:Cactus 2287:Cactus 2231:Cactus 2203:Cactus 2189:tounge 2039:WP:ORG 1674:WP:AGF 1564:Nataly 1548:In my 1408:Done. 1103:Admins 1099:better 4290:Voice 4269:email 3823:wonky 3707:WPKLF 3661:-( -- 3322:BRIAN 3289:basis 3275:BRIAN 3268:after 3223:BRIAN 3159:BRIAN 3115:BRIAN 3067:Voice 3019:Voice 2677:e Ong 2583:BRIAN 2567:BRIAN 2550:BRIAN 2352:mamma 2228:-) -- 2222:These 2193:cheek 2156:Durin 1760:BRIAN 1445:Email 16:< 4509:Mike 4444:Mike 4395:Mike 4293:-of- 4261:talk 4104:I'm 3760:. -- 3623:left 3592:this 3327:0918 3280:0918 3228:0918 3164:0918 3120:0918 3070:-of- 3022:-of- 2588:0918 2572:0918 2555:0918 2170:Tito 2057:WP:N 1765:0918 1636:logs 1612:talk 1591:DaB. 1307:and 4474:Lar 4418:Lar 4386:one 4350:Lar 4312:few 4306:Ta! 4296:All 4286:it. 4228:RfA 4207:Lar 4149:Lar 4132:'s 4089:Lar 4021:Lar 3984:Lar 3944:Lar 3877:Lar 3838:Lar 3781:Lar 3736:Lar 3668:man 3637:Lar 3606:man 3539:Lar 3501:Lar 3439:Lar 3392:Lar 3303:Lar 3251:Lar 3202:Lar 3140:Lar 3073:All 3048:Lar 3025:All 3011:CSS 2976:Lar 2934:Lar 2848:man 2802:DYK 2769:Lar 2722:Lar 2666:Ter 2612:Lar 2542:DYK 2525:Lar 2433:Tnx 2410:Lar 2367:man 2354:mia 2327:Lar 2291:man 2264:Lar 2235:man 2207:man 2191:in 2133:Lar 2100:Ans 2073:Lar 2059:?) 2010:Lar 1977:Lar 1935:Lar 1869:Lar 1816:Lar 1787:Lar 1731:Lar 1693:Lar 1562:-- 1550:RfA 1523:Lar 1473:Lar 1422:Lar 1393:Lar 1339:Lar 1204:Lar 1188:Lar 1149:Lar 87:. 4512:• 4476:: 4447:• 4420:: 4398:• 4352:: 4253:- 4209:: 4151:: 4091:: 4023:: 3986:: 3946:: 3879:: 3840:: 3783:: 3738:: 3713:-- 3710:}} 3704:{{ 3639:: 3541:: 3503:: 3485:) 3478:" 3441:: 3394:: 3354:: 3305:: 3253:: 3204:: 3142:: 3050:: 2978:: 2953:-- 2936:: 2911:-- 2905:. 2841:-- 2835:. 2771:: 2724:: 2674:nc 2655:| 2614:: 2527:: 2503:58 2412:: 2329:: 2266:: 2174:xd 2135:: 2110:ll 2075:: 2012:: 1979:: 1937:: 1891:| 1871:: 1846:| 1818:: 1789:: 1733:: 1695:: 1525:: 1475:: 1424:: 1395:: 1341:: 1303:, 1299:, 1206:: 1151:: 39:| 27:← 4482:c 4480:/ 4478:t 4470:+ 4466:+ 4426:c 4424:/ 4422:t 4414:+ 4410:+ 4358:c 4356:/ 4354:t 4346:+ 4342:+ 4267:/ 4263:/ 4215:c 4213:/ 4211:t 4203:+ 4199:+ 4157:c 4155:/ 4153:t 4145:+ 4141:+ 4097:c 4095:/ 4093:t 4085:+ 4081:+ 4029:c 4027:/ 4025:t 4017:+ 4013:+ 3992:c 3990:/ 3988:t 3980:+ 3976:+ 3963:| 3952:c 3950:/ 3948:t 3940:+ 3936:+ 3885:c 3883:/ 3881:t 3873:+ 3869:+ 3857:| 3846:c 3844:/ 3842:t 3834:+ 3830:+ 3789:c 3787:/ 3785:t 3777:+ 3773:+ 3744:c 3742:/ 3740:t 3732:+ 3728:+ 3673:✍ 3666:. 3659:: 3645:c 3643:/ 3641:t 3633:+ 3629:+ 3611:✍ 3604:. 3547:c 3545:/ 3543:t 3535:+ 3531:+ 3509:c 3507:/ 3505:t 3497:+ 3493:+ 3447:c 3445:/ 3443:t 3435:+ 3431:+ 3400:c 3398:/ 3396:t 3388:+ 3384:+ 3311:c 3309:/ 3307:t 3299:+ 3295:+ 3259:c 3257:/ 3255:t 3247:+ 3243:+ 3210:c 3208:/ 3206:t 3198:+ 3194:+ 3148:c 3146:/ 3144:t 3136:+ 3132:+ 3056:c 3054:/ 3052:t 3044:+ 3040:+ 2984:c 2982:/ 2980:t 2971:+ 2966:+ 2942:c 2940:/ 2938:t 2929:+ 2924:+ 2853:✍ 2846:. 2785:- 2777:c 2775:/ 2773:t 2764:+ 2759:+ 2730:c 2728:/ 2726:t 2717:+ 2712:+ 2670:e 2620:c 2618:/ 2616:t 2607:+ 2602:+ 2533:c 2531:/ 2529:t 2520:+ 2515:+ 2481:/ 2477:/ 2418:c 2416:/ 2414:t 2405:+ 2400:+ 2372:✍ 2365:. 2358:: 2335:c 2333:/ 2331:t 2322:+ 2317:+ 2296:✍ 2289:. 2272:c 2270:/ 2268:t 2259:+ 2254:+ 2240:✍ 2233:. 2226:: 2212:✍ 2205:. 2141:c 2139:/ 2137:t 2128:+ 2123:+ 2105:e 2081:c 2079:/ 2077:t 2068:+ 2063:+ 2018:c 2016:/ 2014:t 2005:+ 2000:+ 1985:c 1983:/ 1981:t 1972:+ 1967:+ 1943:c 1941:/ 1939:t 1930:+ 1925:+ 1877:c 1875:/ 1873:t 1864:+ 1859:+ 1824:c 1822:/ 1820:t 1811:+ 1806:+ 1795:c 1793:/ 1791:t 1782:+ 1777:+ 1739:c 1737:/ 1735:t 1726:+ 1721:+ 1701:c 1699:/ 1697:t 1688:+ 1683:+ 1656:) 1651:· 1645:· 1639:· 1633:· 1627:· 1621:· 1615:· 1610:( 1568:a 1531:c 1529:/ 1527:t 1518:+ 1513:+ 1481:c 1479:/ 1477:t 1468:+ 1463:+ 1430:c 1428:/ 1426:t 1417:+ 1412:+ 1401:c 1399:/ 1397:t 1388:+ 1383:+ 1347:c 1345:/ 1343:t 1334:+ 1329:+ 1282:2 1277:o 1272:e 1267:v 1262:e 1257:t 1252:S 1212:c 1210:/ 1208:t 1199:+ 1194:+ 1175:I 1157:c 1155:/ 1153:t 1144:+ 1139:+ 125:e 118:t 111:v 43:→ 31:|

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.