Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Lr0^^k

Source 📝

164:) has been active since 2009 and while that doesn't mean that someone isn't a sock, it does make it less likely. You also need to take this into consideration: what if they aren't socks and aren't people getting their friends to revert your edits. What if it was just that you wrote something that might have been wrong? This is when you need to go discuss things on the talk page, not just start edit warring. I think that you should take this time to look over general editing guidelines. 39: 226:
I would prefer that you not try to hide this. If you are not coming back to Knowledge (XXG) then why should it matter if this is on your userpage? To be honest, take this into consideration: the block is not permanent, it is temporary. Saying that you are going to retire just because you weren't
138:. Discussion of 'contested' additions (initiated by sock) currently undergoing on talk page. I would like to appeal block, and in the worst case a simple 'topic ban', as all edits on this site constructive. Thank you 267:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 160:
Accusing others of sockpuppetry isn't really an excuse. If you believe that someone is a sock, discuss it on the talk page or bring it up at SPI. Offhand I notice that one of the accounts (
132:, subsequent reverts by friends/people called upon by sock included reverts of constructive edits. Once the reverting of constructive material stopped, no reverts done. Please see page 129: 200:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
185: 79: 292: 288: 74: 279:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
52: 284: 46: 227:
unblocked to immediately edit does not reflect well on you, nor does trying to hide the fact that you were blocked.
51:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
17: 93: 280: 231: 214: 168: 161: 256: 247: 210:
You can blank most other things on your userpage but you cannot blank out any block/unblock posts.
276: 260: 125: 272: 264: 228: 211: 194: 165: 275:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 268: 139: 57: 296: 238: 221: 175: 147: 263:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
34:
This user is no longer active on Knowledge (XXG) as of 21 August 2015.
37: 182:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
130:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim
202:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
134: 107: 103: 97: 88: 84: 70: 66: 62: 45:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
255:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 18:User talk:LimitationsAndRestrictions495656778774 8: 124:I was aware of policy, reverts fall under 7: 25: 281:review the candidates' statements 287:. For the Election committee, 257:Arbitration Committee election 248:ArbCom elections are now open! 128:, as suspected socks involved 1: 297:17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 283:and submit your choices on 239:10:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC) 222:10:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC) 176:10:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC) 148:22:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC) 49:, who declined the request. 312: 289:MediaWiki message delivery 186:guide to appealing blocks 143: 42: 261:Arbitration Committee 94:change block settings 41: 265:arbitration process 277:arbitration policy 162:User:Mikrobølgeovn 43: 16:(Redirected from 303: 235: 218: 199: 193: 172: 137: 113: 111: 100: 82: 80:deleted contribs 40: 31: 30: 21: 311: 310: 306: 305: 304: 302: 301: 300: 285:the voting page 251: 233: 216: 205: 197: 191: 190:, then use the 179: 170: 151: 133: 101: 91: 77: 60: 53:blocking policy 38: 35: 32: 28: 27: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 309: 307: 254: 250: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 224: 180: 158: 154:Decline reason 122: 118:Request reason 115: 36: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 308: 299: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 249: 246: 240: 237: 236: 230: 225: 223: 220: 219: 213: 209: 208: 207: 206: 204: 203: 196: 189: 187: 178: 177: 174: 173: 167: 163: 157: 155: 150: 149: 145: 141: 140:495656778774 136: 131: 127: 121: 119: 114: 109: 105: 99: 95: 90: 86: 81: 76: 72: 71:global blocks 68: 67:active blocks 64: 59: 54: 50: 48: 47:administrator 19: 252: 232: 215: 201: 183: 181: 169: 159: 153: 152: 123: 117: 116: 89:creation log 56: 44: 229:Tokyogirl79 212:Tokyogirl79 166:Tokyogirl79 273:topic bans 85:filter log 269:site bans 184:read the 126:WP:NOT3RR 104:checkuser 63:block log 75:contribs 234:(。◕‿◕。) 217:(。◕‿◕。) 195:unblock 171:(。◕‿◕。) 135:History 98:unblock 29:Retired 259:. The 58:Lr0^^k 188:first 293:talk 144:talk 253:Hi, 108:log 55:). 295:) 271:, 198:}} 192:{{ 156:: 146:) 120:: 102:• 96:• 92:• 87:• 83:• 78:• 73:• 69:• 65:• 291:( 142:( 112:) 110:) 106:( 61:( 20:)

Index

User talk:LimitationsAndRestrictions495656778774
administrator
blocking policy
Lr0^^k
block log
active blocks
global blocks
contribs
deleted contribs
filter log
creation log
change block settings
unblock
checkuser
log
WP:NOT3RR
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim
History
495656778774
talk
22:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
User:Mikrobølgeovn
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
10:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
guide to appealing blocks
unblock
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
10:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.