Knowledge

User talk:MFH/phil

Source 📝

205:
About the "sequence" thing. I think you should have rather written a short paragraph before the "See also" section, rather trying to fit it all in a bullet point in "See also". But this is again debateable, and actually is a matter of style.
26:
Hi, this is the subpage of my user talk for general thoughts, philosophical, epistemological and similar discussions (from about usage of punctuation marks to the meaning of life and the universe).
53:
In some sense, my double quotes correspond to the double braces you put around "welcome"...(I didn't know that it is "current" to create an other user's Talk page by putting this template on top.)
210:
Yes. Is there some "official" advice about this? I find it not so bad if the links in the "see also" section contain a very brief hint (that should not exceed a line even on a
221:
There is no official advice as far as I am aware of. This is why on Knowledge on has to be always willing to talk, and if necessary compromise or accept different opinions.
59:(Sorry, can't help putting quotes around words whose meaning should be thought about twice... Can a "welcome" be "real"? I will look up the definitions of these words...) 239:
No problem. I start to notice that one (me, at least) is never careful enough when making the first steps on a new kind of "communication media"...
121:: For me, that's not the same, and I didn't want to express what you say it looks like. I'm sorry if you got it wrong. I thought adding 42:
Thanks for your welcoming message... In fact, it came so quickly after my "post" that I first thought it was done by a robot.
231:
So let me back off and say that I exaggerated with my remarks. Good we got to the root of it though. Cheers,
56:
But I used also "welcoming message" without quotes, and this second occurrence refers to your "real" welcome.
99:
About quotation marks, the same remark as above. Putting quotation marks changes the meaning of a word.
232: 222: 135: 77: 76:
I think I exaggerated a bit. Quotes are of course very appropriate in many circumstances.
17: 134:
Same for "sequence", if it is a true sequence, it must not have quotation marks.
110:
When you say that I "welcome" you, it looks as if you think I did not mean it.
240: 163: 126: 103: 60: 211: 34:(continued from "Welcome" section of the main user talk page.) 162:
something like "so to say", or "what could be called ...".
159:
quotation (citation), or "the word (or phrase) ...", and
178:
OK, you have a very good point. I would still prefer
46:
By the way, it was a real welcome, not a "welcome". :)
156:
In fact, for me, the double quotes have 2 meanings:
8: 146:not' a true sequence! That's why the quotes. 214:display), if they're not self-explaining. 7: 125:(w/o quotes!) would make this clear. 123:thank you for the welcoming message 24: 94:about quotation marks...(cont'd) 1: 196:Thank you for your "welcome" 115:thank you for "welcoming" me 119:thank you for the "Welcome" 258: 184:Thank you for your welcome 38:Thanks for your "Welcome" 243:01:59, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC) 235:22:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) 225:02:14, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC) 138:18:42, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) 80:21:27, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) 63:20:55, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) 202:but that's debatable. 249: 93: 257: 256: 252: 251: 250: 248: 247: 246: 233:Oleg Alexandrov 223:Oleg Alexandrov 176: 136:Oleg Alexandrov 96: 78:Oleg Alexandrov 40: 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 255: 253: 245: 244: 229: 228: 227: 226: 216: 215: 200: 199: 198: 197: 188: 187: 186: 185: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 160: 151: 150: 149: 148: 132: 131: 130: 129: 108: 107: 106: 95: 92: 90: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 83: 82: 81: 67: 66: 65: 64: 57: 54: 48: 47: 39: 36: 31: 28: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 254: 242: 238: 237: 236: 234: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 208: 207: 203: 195: 194: 193: 192: 191: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 173: 165: 161: 158: 157: 155: 154: 153: 152: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 139: 137: 128: 124: 120: 116: 113:I didn't say 112: 111: 109: 105: 101: 100: 98: 97: 91: 79: 75: 74: 73: 72: 71: 70: 69: 68: 62: 58: 55: 52: 51: 50: 49: 45: 44: 43: 37: 35: 29: 27: 19: 18:User talk:MFH 230: 204: 201: 189: 177: 174:More replies 145: 133: 122: 118: 114: 89: 41: 33: 25: 144:Well, it's 102:I know. 212:palmtop 30:Welcome 117:, but 16:< 241:MFH 190:to 164:MFH 127:MFH 104:MFH 61:MFH

Index

User talk:MFH
MFH
Oleg Alexandrov
MFH
MFH
Oleg Alexandrov
MFH
palmtop
Oleg Alexandrov
Oleg Alexandrov
MFH

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.