User talk:Mactographer/Archive-1

1420:"Ugly" isn't just my POV. I maintain a couple of templates, and for one moderately sized infobox I have one user complaining that it's too wide and needs to be shrunk. Here we end up with the text getting squeezed between the image and the navbox, so if anything it's worse than any infobox could be. It's for this reason that you almost never find images in the intro outside an infobox or navbox, and I very much think that if I hadn't reverted, someone else would have. I don't think it's really suitable for the kind of decorative image you have in mind, though. For one, it's relatively large as such things go; and it's insufficiently abstract to represent the subject in a general way. It's the lack of generality that speaks to the POV issue with regard to its placement: even without a caption it's clearly a Catholic altar. The intro needs to be a broad summary of the article that follows. Devoting so much space to an image of one church's version of the Eucharist is therefore out of place. 1051:(posted from my site) I'm sorry, but I disagree. If a same-sex civil union was a wedding, then legally they would be called weddings and thus form a marriage. Legal battles remain to be fought over the legality of creating an institution called gay marriage in most countries and states around the world. However, at this time, most countries and states still don’t recognize something called a gay marriage. Specifically in New Zealand, there is no institution called gay marriage. Thus the image shows the legally binding definition of a “civil union” as it is defined in that country. Even the definition for “Same-sex marriage” on the Wiki site delineates the two different designations. I merely corrected a miss-definition within the caption. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mactographer (talk • contribs) 05:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC). 1388:; it provided no information because there was no caption explaining to the reader what it was; and even if there was a caption no useful information would be conveyed because it did not actually show the Eucharistic elements "being used" as the description page claims. It furthermore does not show a typically laid-out Catholic altar since it was evidently cropped from someone's wedding photo and it's set up specifically for a nuptial mass, which I suppose explains that one very weird candle. I furthermore had no idea what you intended to convey with your edit comment: what's an "Editorial photo"? 1584:, and everyone is taking pictures. I took pictures. Millions of tourists take picture up there each year. I think that is a logical argument to say that the photo is not unique. If you disagree with that, take it up with an administrator. As to my photo, I consider it to be important because it's dedicated to the man who the monument was named after. Besides, there wasn't a picture of the monument's namesake on the page. If you come up with a better one, I'm all for it. Or, if you completely disagree, take it up with an administrator. 126:

more valuable to an image. Knowledge is striving for an encyclopedia that is both high quality and free of any restrictions (other than basic attribution). Surely you can understand why people were not impressed by the link to your website, as that is something very much discouraged and borderline considered spam. I can also understand your desire to retain some control over the image but unfortunately, that is something you have to give up when you donate images to wikipedia. I've had to do so for some of my most prized images (eg

226:. If you don't understand french, you can try Babelfish.altavista.com. Anyway, to be precise, the article does not state that this image is of the 12 shot model. Nor does it mention anything about patent dates, so I am no help to you. Perhaps you would be interested in the 8 shot image in that french article though. Oddly, french wikipedia has no article on their own dude. Maybe they should learn english so that they could learn more about their culture. Just kidding. Heh heh. 510:

than doing a side by side comparison as you suggested. Someone can look at the various areas of the image and see exactly where the changes were made with an animation. This is much more difficult and less noticeable with a side by side illustration. To completely disregard the benefits of web media for the sake of deferring to "old" media is, in my opinion, to try to grandfather the need for buggy whips when the automobile has clearly made the need for buggies obsolete.

1056:

but isn't self-classified as a wedding, etc. Gay marriage is not legal in New Zealand but civil unions are open to same-sex couples. If a gay couple wishes to have a wedding for their civil union, then so be it. Wedding does not equal marriage, and vice versa. Therefore the caption as I had it is correct: it is a same-sex wedding. The wedding is the ceremony and civil union entered into through a wedding Enzedbrit 20:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

1659: 1066: 1243: 924: 883: 386: 1164:

almost gets lost. In other words, I think it is still quite possible to take a more visually interesting photo of the same subject matter to illustrate that selective color can be used for applications other than wedding imagery. I would suggest getting a bit closer to the red sign and framing it in a manner that corresponds with this

474:

However, animations are also annoying to many people, and I think in this context having two separate pictures side-by-side would be more appropriate. The animation would be completely lost to anyone reading through quickly, having a browser with animation turned off, or for a printed version of the article.

823:

Thanks. I was just uploading it now, and wasn't quite sure I liked how it shows up small in the userbox. So I tried a cropped version ... didn't like that either. So I'm just gonna leave it for now and try to improve the 45pix version later. But I didn't even get a chance to notify you before getting

1196:

Cheers for your reply! Don't worry about your original comment, I would be miffed if the same thing happened to me. As for your remark about my image, THANKS!! :) I understand where you are coming from and I am always open to criticism with regards to my hobby. The image was not meant to be anything

509:

I also believe the very nature of animated web media lends itself to more advantages than disadvantages. We are using browsers on electronic machines, not pen an paper or books to view the web, thus the media is different. I also think seeing the dramatic differences in such an image has more impact

1555:

page? There was a problem with overcrowding photos on the page, and yours was one of the casualties. If you want to replace you picture, I suggest using a gallery. Oh, just wondering, who is the 13 year old editor you're referring to? If you mean me, your facts would be wrong on my age, contrary to

1134:

I have read your comment regarding my contribution to the article. I don't feel I made my reasons that clear for changing your image; the reason I changed it was because I feel that the article gives the impression that this very effective technique can only be applied to wedding photography, which

1055:

That's the problem. Wedding is not a legal term. Marriage is. Wedding is an event, etymologically attached to the term in old English which meant 'pledge'. People can enter into a marriage or a civil union by a wedding, by signing at a registrar's office, by a small gathering that has a celebration

1018:

option for improving articles. If you're working on any Bay Area-related stub, start, or B-class articles, simply add their names to the list, and if any of the articles improve a class within a week, you'll be recognized for your contributions. If you have any questions about how it works, post on

329:

and the language is too informal. It really should be worded more like "the technique has become less popular in recent years", or something along those lines. However, that is still POV, or at least an unreferenced assertion - if there is proof in some third-party source that spot/selective colour

1163:

limited to wedding photos. However, besides seeing one of my favorite images removed (which is neither here nor there), it seemed to me that your replacement image wasn't (if you'll pardon me) particularly well framed or composed. Also, the sign in question was such a small part of the image, it

473:

I undid your edit to the digital photography article. I don't think the edit substantially improved the article. Furthermore, the illustration was an animated GIF. GIF images are not appropriate for photographs because of quantization issues. I realize GIF was used to do get the animation to work.

204:

I came across your lunar eclipse image on the FPC- it didn't go so well, but I'm impressed by the time and effort you put into it- and I would have voted for it had you not withdrawn the nomination. I hope the FPC doesn't sour your wikipedia experience- you clearly have a lot of technical ability,

125:

Hi there. You commented "In any case, it’s been highly rated in other forums. Only this forum has seen fit to shred it.". I believe this is probably because on wikipedia, we're more concerned with the factual and encyclopaedic content of our images than other forums, where skill and creativity are

735:

The "current understanding" of fair use policy was implemented by the Wikimedia Foundation. Any comments from users aside, its highly unlikely it is going to change. I hope you understand my compliments on your images were sincere. I've done thousands of these image removals without commenting on

600:

For the record, I am not an administrator, nor one possessing authority to force a resolution over possible POV (which is why I asked if we could consider the matter closed, rather than declaring it to be so). Indeed, if you chose, you could add all that material back right now, if you chose. The

1108:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1041:

Hi there. You changed the photo caption on the Wedding page from same-sex wedding to same-sex civil union. A wedding, as discussed throughout the article in question, is an event. It was traditionally associated with marriage but now, as we have civil unions, weddings can also be the event to

1414:

I assumed the photo was cropped because the comment from when it was uploaded said, "A bride's casual portrait." I naturally figured that since no bride was visible that she had been cropped out. I suppose it was an erroneous comment to begin with though: they're automatically inserted from the

1042:

enter into a civil union. One can call it a marriage ceremony, civil union ceremony, wedding ceremony. The article is about weddings and as the event in question was a wedding for a couple getting civil-unioned, you should respect that definition and not change it to 'same-sex civil union'.

1464:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

294:

section. The author calls Selective Photography "old hat" and I think that demonstrates a personal POV rather than neutral fact. What do you think? But I am reluctant to tag it as such since it might appear I am taking issue due to my conflicting listing of Spot color photography.

557:

Hello, I just saw your pictures from your post to Dark Tea's page, they are beautiful photos man. I love the fact that however many racist Americans ther are, there are always going to be Americans who are ot so stupid, especially when you have such a god College Football season.

605:

in any sense the content of the article; I've done what I think is best for it and offered a justification that is (hopefully) persuasive to you and others, in the hope of avoiding a less-than-civil dispute over it. (The line about a "unilateral dispute resolution" on

1408:

The weird candle was the arrangement in the center, with the flowers and the big candle that had the heart shapes molded onto it. That's not something you typically see on a Catholic altar. I'm a little surprised to see something like that even for a nuptial

1314:

which is upstream of Castaic. I took pretty much the same picture in 2005 so I recognized it. Pyramid Lake doesn't have a picture so you could toss it up there, but you should probably rename the file and whatnot. You probably took the picture from around

1383:

Yes, I accidentally bumped the return key while typing my edit comment. I removed it because an image in that location with a navbar right opposite made for an ugly layout; by occupying the lead position with a large image of a Catholic altar it violated

616:

As for the dispute itself, discussion convinced me that an aside on the practice of Jefferson & Friends™ in an article that is meant to have global scope, especially in a section discussing the origins of a phrase, made for an unnecessary diversion.

190: 1425:

That's not to say the image isn't suitable for somewhere else in the article. I had run out of time just then, which is why I didn't comment on the talk page as I should have when my edit comment went awry, but I do intend to place it elsewhere.

1632:

of an actor portraying Blackbeard? A caption says that picture is from Pirates of the Caribbean. Is that from a Disney Park show, or from the ride? I don't remember that character in any of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies. Thanks.

324:

Doh! I should have checked for other similar articles, really - I should have expected a fairly well-known photographic technique would already be covered. Anyway, yes, I think you're right there - that section is definitely

253:

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

90:

43:

573:

I think delisting a photo from the past is like taking a gold medal from an athlete who won it in the 1936 Olympics because a modern athlete has performed better. Once you win an award, you should be able to keep

458:. I appreciate your kind words! I have started using the Commons more now for uploading. I didn't understand the difference between the Knowledge upload uses and the Commons upload uses until somewhat recently. 1680:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1719:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on

245:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 82:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 35:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an 1613:

Again, what's with the age deal? By the way, not "By the by", I'm not some young gun trying to ruin the website, I'm just trying to help. If you don't like me, please take it up with an administrator.

1104:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1020: 872:

Hello – Based on your significant contribution to one or more San Francisco Bay Area-related articles and/or stated interests on your homepage, I thought you might be interested in this project:

708:

artwork. If there are no issues to my creating a donkey shape and overlaying it with a flag, I might go that route. In the mean time, I hope using "DEM" will not put me in policy violation as it

484:

Thank you for your memo. Most editors don't bother to do such. And I understand the various arguments against animated gifs, but I've seen it used in many other articles here on Knowledge.

1328:

Good eye. You are exactly right. Thanks for catching my error. I've fixed the links, however, I don't think I can change the actual NAME of the photo. Do you know how, if possible? --

290:

Hello. Thanks for the edits, but you didn't go far enough. Upon further research, it appears another article covers the topic. However, I think there are some neutrality issues with the

976: 1015: 969: 962: 753:

You were very kind. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. My question was sincere about creating my own image. Will it fly, or is there another wiki rule I might be breaking? Thanks! --

943:

We are a growing community of Knowledge editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles relevant to the Bay Area. Here are some points that may be helpful:

583: 1223:

I've removed the link to your photograph from this page. It's mostly because the photo has no relevance, the subject isn't on the verified or unverified living veterans list.

1607:"Sorry, I guess you would be about 16 by now. So much older and more mature than I previously suggested. For comparison though, I have a pair of sneakers old than you, son. 1604:"My son"? What's with the put-downs because I'm 16? Age doesn't matter if a hindrance is not being created. If you have a problem with me, take it up with an administrator. 1505:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

1468:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

984: 951: 766:

So long as the original shape of the donkey is not from the Democrat Party donkey, you'll be fine. If you want me to review it after you upload it, feel free to ask. --

1090:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. 543:. Personally I don't have a strict numerical figure for promoting, but a two-thirds majority would normally be the minimum I would feel comfortable promoting at. 159:

Please expand this article. It is not clear who makes it, what kind of camera is it. Also, it might be more appropriate to merge it into a more general article. —

1168:. A clinical or informational photo need not look like a snap shot, and with a bit of attention to framing and subject matter can be improved to a great degree. 1337:

ha, I don't have a clue, I was hoping that I could just put that proposal out there and maybe by chance you'd know. Nice work on the rest of your photos btw.

1105: 933: 896: 891: 947:

Our main aim is to help improve Bay Area-related articles, so if people ask for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.

691:

be. In fact, as you know, it's currently locked at the moment due to the disagreements re: the policy. But I will work around it ... whatever the policy

1713: 1692: 1465:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

131: 1316: 601:

only thing stopping you from doing that would be the fact good editors like yourself generally keep out of edit/flame wars. I have not, therefore,

1518: 1087: 578:

That is exactly what I think of delisting! Furthermore, when we delist a picture we are, in some way, "erasing the past" like in Georger Orwell's

300: 1514: 1109: 1098: 1083: 675:

Hello, Durin. Thanks for the compliments =) and nice intro into why you felt you had to edit my userbox per "the current understanding" of the

658: 634:

Hi David! I just wanted to stop by and say I was very impressed with some of the wedding imagery you've done. In particular, I really enjoyed

334:, then dropped off again, then that's okay and a reference should be added, but otherwise that whole statement should be removed altogether. ~ 1577:"It shows the view from the top. Much more valuable and unique in "my opinion" than the one you added of some statuary my precocious teen." 127: 1726:. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our 1369:

seems to contradict what you were told, but permission is permission. :-) I figured I'd leave it for you to straighten out as you like.--

1135:

looking at your work appears to be a field you excel at :), so i changed the image to show another application of the technique/process.

1731: 1534: 1113: 607: 412: 277: 114: 67: 1643:

Thanks. Someone probably assumed that was from Pirates of the Caribbean. Amazing how much pure speculation ends up in Knowledge. --

895:, a collaborative effort focused on improving Knowledge's coverage of the Bay Area. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the 312: 437:

for your very professional photos. BTW, if you haven't already (and I'm too lazy to check ;)), I'd suggest putting these files on

680: 339: 250: 87: 40: 1499: 1495: 1436: 1398: 404: 266: 246: 223: 103: 83: 56: 36: 276:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 113:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 66:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at 1591: 1489: 143: 1677: 1201:

with my girlfriend. Hopefully when my Canon gets fixed I can get out there and get back to taking some real pictures.

676: 662: 824:

your message. Called it a flag donkey so as to avoid any logo issues via naming convention. Thanks for the notice! --

1712:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,

433:

I can't believe I was so rude as to not thank you for your photographic contributions to Knowledge, so here's a big

1658: 1355: 1307: 1262: 516: 261: 98: 51: 647: 242: 1311: 1094: 1074: 1705: 1283: 1273: 1266: 1254: 1236: 1154:

Nice reply to my my rather rude and terse message. I was up late when I penned it, and was not in a jovial mood.

1595: 1293: 1250: 1024: 661:. The use of fair use images outside of the main article namespace is not permitted per terms of our policy at 635: 79: 1362:

tag, but it's a work of a state government, which is specifically excluded in the fine print of the template.

1269:

is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

643: 1610:"By the by, does the AG church teach anything about humility, respecting others and especially your elders?" 639: 1456: 1448: 1289: 654: 32: 1686: 1668: 972:. If you'll be editing stub, start, or B-class articles, consider using Jumpaclass to track your progress. 308: 284: 17: 230: 1415:"Summary" text, and I imagine you just pasted it in from another upload and corrected it after the fact. 1226: 1460:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 613:

I offer my sincere apologies that I have, evidently, acted in a way to make you think to the contrary.

475: 539:

The rules on this are deliberately left rather vague; the FPC page only mentions that the image needs

489: 1359: 858: 791: 1581: 1552: 1028: 997: 906: 540: 501: 1738: 1673: 1522: 1483: 1472: 1433: 1395: 1370: 1079: 396: 369: 441:; you can link to them from Knowledge the same way you do photos uploaded to Knowledge itself. 1329: 1179: 825: 754: 727: 525: 459: 304: 587: 416: 164: 140: 1714:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license

1282:

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate

1258: 1207: 1142: 854: 335: 1741: 1647: 1637: 1618: 1564: 1541: 1440: 1402: 1373: 1341: 1332: 1322: 1296: 1229: 1210: 1182: 1145: 1121: 1046: 1031: 1000: 909: 862: 828: 798: 770: 757: 740: 730: 669: 624: 590: 562: 547: 528: 478: 462: 448: 423: 398: 371: 343: 316: 209: 170: 147: 1385: 1165: 1043: 544: 273: 206: 110: 63: 1065: 355: 222:

In response to your query about patent dates, I don't know. The information came from

1735: 1727: 1644: 1634: 1528: 1428: 1390: 1338: 1319: 1272:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

1197:

special, it was just a quick scene I snapped while walking through the local park in

1011: 975:

If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our

389: 378: 362: 358: 326: 495: 621: 455: 445: 420: 179: 1511:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1086:

as to why its use in Knowledge articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the

1538: 559: 160: 153: 135: 1242: 419:? (I've invited him as well, and I'm not taking a side in this.) Thank you. :) 1615: 1561: 1292:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --

1117: 795: 767: 737: 666: 189: 1461: 1629: 1366: 1265:

from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

704:

Maybe you can tell me if you would see any problems if I generated wholly

1672:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 1198: 923: 882: 1078:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 1173:

In any case, thank you for a much more gracious reply than I deserved.

385: 354:

I'm not monitoring your user page but I was monitoring recent IP edits

1580:

I have to disagree. Hear me out on this. I've been to the top of the

961:

The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as

490:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Jupiter_Great_Red_Spot_Animation.gif

1601:"The same suggestion back at you regarding YOUR photo, my son." 1587:"Your opinion, but not that of any others from what I can see." 721:

In any case, thanks for your tactful approach to my violation. =)

1479: 653:

Also, I wanted to let you know that I removed a fair use image (

1354:

I was just browsing the USGov PD category, and I realized that

502:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:AnimECHECS-Le-coup-du-Berger3.gif

413:

Talk:Separation of church and state#NPOV dispute over Jefferson

257:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

229:-If you want to get ahold of me faster, contact me on Commons: 94:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

47:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

853:

to your list; what word of it did I change? Please give diffs

1708:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 1657: 1241: 1159:

Point well taken that the selective color process is indeed

1064: 990:

Again, welcome! We hope you enjoy working on this project.

922: 1699:

without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template

1722: 1506: 955: 950:

Most important discussions take place on the project's

1574:

Responses to your comment left on my talk page today:

1502:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

679:. The reason I used "quotes" was it seems there is a 496:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Rivertree_thirds_md.gif

1730:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1533:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1112:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1061:

Fair use rationale for Image:Eve-of-destruction.jpg

968:Our system for improving lower-quality articles is 444:Anyway, thanks again for your time and support. :) 205:and a lot to contribute to the project. God bless! 1219:Your addition to the Suriving Veterans of WW1 page 1482:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 979:, to help us improve our foreign Bay Area topics. 438: 237:License tagging for Image:Bride-groom-walking.jpg 1261:, another Knowledge user, requesting that it be 620:Keep up the good work, anyway. Yours and stuff, 849:What in Heaven's name are you talking about? I 1676:, but its use in Knowledge articles fails our 1280:to the page, and put a note on its talk page. 1628:Hi. Could you provide a little more info on 1590:You probably missed it, but I did it because 642:(that expression on the girl is fantastic!), 586:but, as you can see, without much success. - 74:License tagging for Image:PL-amphitheater.jpg 8: 1310:of yours of Lake Castaic, but it's actually 330:processing gained popularity as a result of 27:License tagging for Image:Bartlett-grave.jpg 1654:Replaceable fair use Image:Rachelward-2.JPG 932:Hi, Mactographer-Archive-1, and welcome to 877: 1716:, or by taking a picture of it yourself. 1551:How does your photo add any value to the 515:Thus in this case, I default to the Wiki 1478:tag can be used to release it under the 1367:http://www.uncwil.edu/www/copyright.html 983:If you have any questions, feel free to 415:so we can resolve the NPOV dispute with 1496:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use 965:, which you are welcome to participate. 1598:under the topic "Regarding Pictures". 1517:. If the image is copyrighted under a 659:User:Mactographer/Userboxes/Demsupport 187: 7: 1570:Reply to "Washington Monument Photo" 987:, and we will be happy to help you. 954:. It is highly recommended that you 357:. Pleas log-in next time other wise 1494:or one of the other tags listed at 278:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 115:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 68:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 1560:. Thank you, and have a nice day. 1556:Knowledge's policy on facts: only 892:WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area 889:You have been invited to join the 224:Appareil_photographique_historique 24: 610:was merely meant to be amusing.) 1693:di-replaceable fair use disputed 1288:Feel free to leave a message on 881: 384: 280:. 08:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 188: 918: 582:. I have once raised the issue 469:Digital Photography edit undone 272:This is an automated notice by 109:This is an automated notice by 62:This is an automated notice by 1732:Media copyright questions page 1535:Media copyright questions page 1531:after 02:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1500:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1249:Hello, this is a message from 1114:Media copyright questions page 683:over what the policy actually 405:Separation of church and state 361:will take those as vandalism. 267:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 104:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 57:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1: 1088:boilerplate fair use template 1032:21:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 1010:This is an invitation to use 1001:02:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 910:21:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 648:Image:Bride-groom-walking.jpg 596:Regarding the NPOV dispute... 463:22:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 449:21:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 424:21:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 399:06:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 372:06:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 344:13:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 317:12:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 243:Image:Bride-groom-walking.jpg 1515:criteria for speedy deletion 1290:the bot operator's talk page 1276:, please affix the template 1110:criteria for speedy deletion 1075:Image:Eve-of-destruction.jpg 863:16:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 829:22:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 799:21:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 771:13:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 758:06:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 741:06:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 731:23:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 670:15:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 625:20:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 591:15:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 563:00:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 548:23:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 117:. 12:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 1742:19:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1648:10:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 1638:10:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1358:is mistagged. It's got the 1284:Image:GG-ftpoint-bridge.jpg 1274:Image:GG-ftpoint-bridge.jpg 1267:Image:GG-ftpoint-bridge.jpg 1255:Image:GG-ftpoint-bridge.jpg 1253:. A tag has been placed on 1237:Image:GG-ftpoint-bridge.jpg 677:Knowledge:Fair use criteria 663:Knowledge:Fair use criteria 529:03:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 479:01:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 198:The Photographer's Barnstar 70:. 07:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 1757: 1687:the image description page 1619:00:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 1565:13:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 1527:the image will be deleted 1095:the image description page 1047:00:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC) 963:article quality assessment 636:Image:Wedding-rings-02.jpg 630:Image work and one userbox 262:Knowledge:Image use policy 210:00:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 99:Knowledge:Image use policy 52:Knowledge:Image use policy 1706:the image discussion page 1547:Washington Monument Photo 1441:22:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1403:09:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 1374:15:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1312:Pyramid Lake (California) 1097:and edit it to include a 921: 644:Image:Bridemaids-girl.jpg 359:recent changes patrollers 194: 171:19:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 148:10:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 80:Image:PL-amphitheater.jpg 1678:first fair use criterion 1596:Talk:Washington Monument 1542:02:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 1356:Image:092205burns023.jpg 1342:00:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 1333:05:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 1323:02:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 1297:18:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 1230:19:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 1211:21:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 1183:22:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1146:14:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1084:explanation or rationale 1027:. Thanks for reading! — 699:be now or in the future. 640:Image:Ringbearer-boy.jpg 121:Comments on the FPC page 33:Image:Bartlett-grave.jpg 1457:Image:All-that-I-am.jpg 1449:Image:All-that-I-am.jpg 1447:Unspecified source for 1122:18:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 899:. Thanks for reading! 736:people's talk pages. -- 655:Image:Democratslogo.svg 411:Would you kindly visit 217: 1669:Image:Rachelward-2.JPG 1663: 1246: 1138:keep up the good work 1069: 936:San Francisco Bay Area 927: 285:Spot color photography 251:image description page 88:image description page 41:image description page 18:User talk:Mactographer 1666:Thanks for uploading 1661: 1454:Thanks for uploading 1245: 1072:Thanks for uploading 1068: 926: 792:Image:Flag-donkey.png 439:the Wikimedia Commons 303:comment was added by 241:Thanks for uploading 78:Thanks for uploading 31:Thanks for uploading 1662:Replaceable fair use 1490:non-free fair use in 1486:, use a tag such as 1127:RE: Selective Colour 985:ask on the talk page 952:main discussion page 535:Indian Bride picture 1689:and edit it to add 1582:Washington Monument 1553:Washington Monument 1294:Android Mouse Bot 2 1037:Civil Union Wedding 977:translation section 665:item #9. Thanks, -- 231:User talk:Makthorpe 1664: 1523:Knowledge:Fair use 1513:, as described on 1484:Knowledge:Fair use 1247: 1099:fair use rationale 1070: 928: 794:...Nicely done! -- 377:Yep, thats called 1594:brought it up on 1439: 1401: 1360:Template:PD-USGov 995: 994: 904: 903: 861: 716:be at the moment. 320: 218:Disderi's camera- 215: 214: 146: 1748: 1725: 1696: 1624:Blackbeard photo 1519:non-free license 1493: 1477: 1471: 1432: 1394: 1302:Image Correction 1279: 1263:speedily deleted 1251:an automated bot 1106:my contributions 1082:but there is no 919: 885: 878: 857: 845:Editing replies? 681:bit of a dispute 436: 417:User:Jonathunder 394: 388: 367: 332:Schindler's List 298: 192: 185: 184: 138: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1728:Fair Use policy 1721: 1690: 1656: 1626: 1572: 1549: 1492:|article name}} 1487: 1475: 1469: 1452: 1381: 1352: 1350:Ken Burns photo 1304: 1277: 1240: 1221: 1129: 1063: 1039: 1008: 940: 917: 870: 855:Septentrionalis 847: 650:. Nicely done! 632: 598: 570: 555: 537: 471: 434: 431: 409: 390: 363: 352: 342: 299:—The preceding 288: 249:applied to the 239: 220: 183: 157: 123: 86:applied to the 76: 39:applied to the 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1754: 1752: 1710: 1709: 1702: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1625: 1622: 1571: 1568: 1548: 1545: 1451: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1380: 1377: 1351: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1303: 1300: 1271: 1270: 1239: 1235:Missing image 1233: 1224: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1195: 1188: 1186: 1185: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1156: 1155: 1150: 1128: 1125: 1116:. Thank you. ( 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1038: 1035: 1029:Emiellaiendiay 1007: 1004: 998:Peter G Werner 993: 992: 981: 980: 973: 966: 959: 948: 935: 930: 916: 913: 907:Peter G Werner 902: 901: 886: 875: 869: 866: 846: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 761: 760: 746: 745: 744: 743: 723: 722: 718: 717: 701: 700: 631: 628: 597: 594: 569: 566: 554: 551: 536: 533: 532: 531: 521: 520: 512: 511: 506: 505: 504: 499: 498: 493: 492: 486: 485: 470: 467: 466: 465: 430: 427: 408: 402: 382: 381: 351: 348: 347: 346: 338: 287: 282: 270: 269: 264: 238: 235: 219: 216: 213: 212: 201: 200: 195: 193: 182: 177: 175: 156: 151: 122: 119: 107: 106: 101: 75: 72: 60: 59: 54: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1753: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1734:. Thank you. 1733: 1729: 1724: 1717: 1715: 1707: 1703: 1700: 1694: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1660: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1631: 1623: 1621: 1620: 1617: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1578: 1575: 1569: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1554: 1546: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1537:. Thank you. 1536: 1532: 1530: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1503: 1501: 1497: 1491: 1485: 1481: 1474: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1387: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1371:SarekOfVulcan 1368: 1365:In addition, 1363: 1361: 1357: 1349: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1313: 1309: 1306:I ran across 1301: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1285: 1275: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1244: 1238: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1228: 1227:87.194.97.107 1218: 1212: 1209: 1204:Thanks again, 1200: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1126: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1100: 1096: 1093:Please go to 1091: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1067: 1060: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1013: 1005: 1003: 1002: 999: 991: 988: 986: 978: 974: 971: 967: 964: 960: 957: 953: 949: 946: 945: 944: 941: 939: 937: 925: 920: 914: 912: 911: 908: 900: 898: 894: 893: 887: 884: 880: 879: 876: 873: 867: 865: 864: 860: 856: 852: 844: 830: 827: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 800: 797: 793: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 772: 769: 765: 764: 763: 762: 759: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 742: 739: 734: 733: 732: 729: 725: 724: 720: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 660: 656: 651: 649: 645: 641: 637: 629: 627: 626: 623: 622:Lewis Collard 618: 614: 611: 609: 608:the talk page 604: 595: 593: 592: 589: 585: 581: 576: 575: 567: 565: 564: 561: 552: 550: 549: 546: 542: 534: 530: 527: 523: 522: 518: 517:no firm rules 514: 513: 508: 507: 503: 500: 497: 494: 491: 488: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 477: 468: 464: 461: 457: 454:Many thanks, 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 442: 440: 428: 426: 425: 422: 418: 414: 406: 403: 401: 400: 397: 395: 393: 387: 380: 376: 375: 374: 373: 370: 368: 366: 360: 356: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 328: 323: 322: 321: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 296: 293: 286: 283: 281: 279: 275: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 258: 255: 252: 248: 244: 236: 234: 232: 227: 225: 211: 208: 203: 202: 199: 196: 191: 186: 181: 178: 176: 173: 172: 168: 167: 162: 155: 152: 150: 149: 145: 142: 137: 133: 129: 120: 118: 116: 112: 105: 102: 100: 97: 96: 95: 92: 89: 85: 81: 73: 71: 69: 65: 58: 55: 53: 50: 49: 48: 45: 42: 38: 34: 26: 19: 1718: 1711: 1698: 1667: 1665: 1627: 1616:Flap Jackson 1612: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1589: 1586: 1579: 1576: 1573: 1562:Flap Jackson 1557: 1550: 1526: 1510: 1504: 1467: 1455: 1453: 1427: 1389: 1382: 1364: 1353: 1330:Mactographer 1305: 1281: 1248: 1222: 1187: 1180:Mactographer 1160: 1149: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1103: 1092: 1073: 1071: 1050: 1040: 1009: 996: 989: 982: 956:watchlist it 942: 931: 929: 905: 890: 888: 874: 871: 850: 848: 826:Mactographer 755:Mactographer 728:Mactographer 713: 709: 705: 696: 692: 688: 684: 652: 633: 619: 615: 612: 602: 599: 579: 577: 572: 571: 556: 538: 526:Mactographer 476:Victor Engel 472: 460:Mactographer 443: 432: 410: 392:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ 391: 383: 365:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ 364: 353: 331: 305:Mactographer 297: 291: 289: 271: 256: 240: 228: 221: 197: 174: 165: 158: 124: 108: 93: 77: 61: 46: 30: 934:WikiProject 897:member list 588:Alvesgaspar 553:Your photos 429:And also... 292:Pop Culture 154:MX-2900ZOOM 1630:your photo 1437:(contribs) 1399:(contribs) 1308:this image 1278:{{hangon}} 1259:Strangerer 1208:Lukebishop 1143:Lukebishop 1016:Jumpaclass 1006:Jumpaclass 970:Jumpaclass 868:Invitation 859:PMAnderson 144:(Contribs) 1723:this link 1507:this link 1473:GFDL-self 1462:copyright 1379:Eucharist 1225:Regards, 1044:Enzedbrit 1021:talk page 851:responded 689:shouldn't 568:Delisting 545:Raven4x4x 541:consensus 435:thank you 274:OrphanBot 247:image tag 207:Borisblue 111:OrphanBot 84:image tag 64:OrphanBot 37:image tag 1736:Garion96 1674:fair use 1645:Dan East 1635:Dan East 1529:48 hours 1339:Toasterb 1320:Toasterb 1199:Hastings 1166:tutorial 1080:fair use 706:original 336:Matticus 313:contribs 301:unsigned 180:Barnstar 1525:) then 1386:WP:NPOV 1286:itself. 915:Welcome 714:may not 697:may not 657:) from 603:decreed 519:policy. 456:Collard 446:Collard 421:Collard 407:dispute 1739:(talk) 1685:Go to 1539:OsamaK 1498:. See 1434:(talk) 1396:(talk) 1023:or on 1012:WP:BAY 685:should 646:, and 379:WP:RCP 327:POVish 161:Centrx 141:(Talk) 136:Diliff 1592:Cadby 1558:facts 1521:(per 1409:mass. 1257:, by 1118:ESkog 796:Durin 768:Durin 738:Durin 667:Durin 350:Reply 233:-Mak 16:< 1480:GFDL 1317:here 1131:Hi, 1025:mine 1019:the 584:here 580:1984 560:Alun 309:talk 166:talk 132:here 130:and 128:here 1704:On 1429:TCC 1391:TCC 1194:Hi, 1161:not 1014:'s 712:or 710:may 695:or 693:may 687:or 574:it. 134:). 1697:, 1695:}} 1691:{{ 1633:-- 1509:. 1488:{{ 1476:}} 1470:{{ 1206:-- 1178:-- 1141:-- 1120:) 1101:. 726:-- 638:, 524:-- 315:) 311:• 169:• 139:| 1701:. 958:. 938:! 340:C 319:. 307:( 163:→

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index