User talk:Mishae - Knowledge (XXG)

1660:: Nobody told me that I will be reblocked just because somebody would be annoyed by my unblock requests. I did nothing (at least I don't see it) to deserve a reblock, and I do nothing now to get a 3rd block! And when I was about to ask Kudpung about what point I failed to get, I was already blocked. If Kudpung would have allowed me to have an excess to this talkpage, maybe I would have gotten the point, but he wanted me blocked. Maybe we just didn't understood each other? It's possible. But there was no reason for a second block, just a clarification and that's it. When people talk in riddles (in this case Kudpung) of course anybody would fail to get the point. Saying stuff like "Another admin might well have pulled the plug already. Now please take the hint.", meant to me as a "ha-ha-ha, we wont unblock you, therefore scram!" What was "the hint"? And I was blocked after I posted completely innocent comment: "So what you are saying that the more I ping you, the more chances I wont be unblocked because it is disruptive? Another question Kudpung, should I wait until the discussion is done, or should I put another unblock request, or I just continue discussion here?" I don't see any violation here, do you? Or are you implying that it wasn't Kudpung who removed my talkpage access and it was his dog??? Like really, I am being serious. So instead of getting this: "This is a community-placed block and will require a communty discussion to unblock you. That will not happen any time soon." - which I did, I also got blocked for no reason. He could have posted this comment without blocking me, and explaining something like "Yes, constant pinging is disruptive and therefore, please stop." And I would have, I was civil and still am. And if it makes you and Kudpung feel better I apologize if I did accused someone. I promise that if I will get clarification about the above I will look on the matter differently.-- 1526:

prejudices, so that should convince a community that I learned a thing or two about that. Also I am aware of the consequences if I will return to my old behavior and therefore I am willing to comply with any policy to a grave. As I stated before, I need an unblock for editing articles and patrolling. Like, Knowledge (XXG) is my home too. And I have a lot to contribute to this project, the articles need to be archived, expanded, and written upon, and by keeping me blocked you wont get a more complete and accurate encyclopedia. If I want to return, and I clearly mentioned numerous of times that there is no threat from me if I will get unblocked, shouldn't community listen?--

1033:" I meant my first block, after which I waited 6 months and then was blocked for WP:IDHT. After that, I evaded it, because I seen no other option, because I already wasn't editing for 6 months! Block, decline block, no difference, you still did it at your own will, because if you would have seen my edits you would probably ignored the evasion, which in this case, you should. My evasion wasn't an act of vandalism, quite the contrary. If only Knowledge (XXG) would have allowed writing articles without an account there will be no reason for it, but because I want to write articles, I demand my account to be unblocked.-- 1812:

Probably, the standard offer still stands from the last blocking admin, but he will need to be consulted, possibly along with all the others. No need to ask me again though because at the moment I'm tied up with other stuff and I'll concur with any decisions made by any of the other admins involved here. I will say his though: I can't see the diatribe above being very conducive to anyone voting to unblock you any time soon, and it might even be time to take away your talk page access again for a while.

1236:, so you can see that I am improving. I also know that I shouldn't bother you with constant unblock requests, so that way a community can come to a consensus. I also would like to mention that while being blocked I have managed to edit many articles by archiving them. During that time of anonymous editing I did no harm to the project. That includes, I never edited a single article talkpage. I need an unblock for writing articles and not for edit count.-- 471:, so you can see that I am improving. I also know that I shouldn't bother you with constant unblock requests, so that way a community can come to a consensus. I also would like to mention that while being blocked I have managed to edit many articles by archiving them. During that time of anonymous editing I did no harm to the project. That includes, I never edited a single article talkpage. I need an unblock for writing articles and not for edit count.-- 24: 2226: 2350: 1244:) 01:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC) In order to differ from my previous try, I will add that I heartily acknowledge block evasion, and am promising not to do that again either. If the community still decides not to unblock my account and rather force me to wait 6 months, I will follow that without evading (although I already did so after the 1st block, which user Koavf said was enough to prove my competence).-- 1146: 381: 1960: 1944: 270: 861:

today I woke up at 7:00 am, so that I can continue on convincing you guys, before my talkpage access will be revoked again. If the admins will be kind enough, after the unblock, will it be possible to restore my autopatroller rights? I was using it only for user talk pages when the new warning or welcome is posted. Right now I realized that one of the

853: 1927: 1550:. I evaded it due to competence prove, though. As for "I am persuaded that giving you the option of requesting an unblock request after you have refrained from editing for six months was as generous an offer as you could reasonably expect." - I refrained from editing for 6 months before Kudpung blocked me for 1063:. Mishae was subsequently unblocked by Writ Keeper, somewhat out of process as it was an unblock without community consent but that's by the by. However, that does bring up the question whether (1) the community imposed block is still in effect and (2) any unblock request should be considered on WP:AN. 1503:

that the potential benefits of your return makes it worth their investing that kind of time researching your contribution and interaction history. (And no, you don't get to pick and choose which parts of your history the reviewing admin examines.) Regarding "if I get denied an unblock request does it

1396:

Likewise; you've pinged me, but I'm not entirely sure why. To assess an unblock request is a time-consuming task at the best of times; if someone does want to assess your contributions and decide you're worthy of yet another second chance I won't stop them, but I can only speak for myself and my time

1836:

even though I tried to convince other admins to unblock me. The sole purpose for talkpage access is to convince other admins to unblock a specific editor and to discuss their conduct. I think I have a right to question your actions if I don't understand something. It never meant to be an accusation,

1364:

As for my block evasion, while I see that people can't trust me because of that (as I can see by above decline), I thought that constructive edits will value more in my case then block evasion (alas, I was wrong). I do however urge the community to reconsider their decision about keeping me blocked.

1231:

I thoroughly analyzed that my behavior was despicable toward the whole community. I'm planning on writing and edit articles (not their talkpages). I know that I also lied to many of you and it was a stupid decision by me to trick all of you. I will not repeat those mistakes (please see a list bellow

1094:

Two points: the community discussion in question led to a one-month block, not an indef one, thus the "community sanction" has long since expired. That WK unblocked before the month was up may have been procedurally questionable but that's irrelevant now. However, that being said, I personally think

466:

1756:

To be absolutely honest, I don't see why my name even keeps cropping up here. Looking over the block log I seem to have been just one of many blocking for the same reasons. We can't all have been wrong. Probably, the standard offer still stands from the last blocking admin, but

1651:

and explain to me why I was blocked after 6 months of not editing a thing! I'm not talking nonsense. Being confused and asking for clarification that's what I do now. The only thing I needed to do was to convince admins into my unblock. My main feeling was, that as long as I will explain my unblock

1600:

I knew Kudpung since the day I started editing here (i.e. roughly 2014). Maybe I don't know him as much as you do, and that's fair. I wasn't disruptive when I was trying to get the point, or as of now it is consider disruptive to ping other editors and ask for clarifications? And no, I don't accuse

1572:

that you think he goes round looking for "excuses" for not unblocking disruptive editors, then you really don't know much about him. You may also like to consider whether such unsubstantiated accusations against other editors have contributed to your unblock requests being declined in the past, and

1318:

I was not myself when I started to be disruptive after unblock (I was in process of breaking up with my girlfriend, and I got stressed). I should have took another month off but it came so sudden (adding to it college and all). Due to this suddenness I was so angry that I started to racially insult

547:

493:

is not allowed. What you showed us is that you have not been able to respect Knowledge (XXG) policies even after you were blocked. That gives me no reason to unblock you. How can I trust you that you will be respecting the policies when unblocked, if you can't respect them while blocked. I'm giving

1266:

Having spent a considerable time reading the comments on this page and looking at other history, including your extensive block log, I am persuaded that giving you the option of requesting an unblock request after you have refrained from editing for six months was as generous an offer as you could

828:

suggests that you were not trying to be deceptive, and I don't see any problems with the edits themselves, so I'd say those count as mitigation to some extent. Whoever reviews your request will hopefully consider all sides. (By the way, I'd urge you not to take the line that previous admin actions

1486:

Somebody on the Russian Knowledge (XXG) have said that Knowledge (XXG) is hijacked by kikes, and you know what, while I at first was reluctant to agree with that blocked user here I came to realization that he is probably right. A black person or a Jew is treated as a Saint here, while a disabled

927:

said that he will wait on hard blocking me for evasion until the discussion will end. Is it still in process? If it is, then you just blocked me out of your will without consensus agreement. In other words, I wasn't notified of a discussion, therefore your block for evasion should be dismissed by

860:

And yes, I admit I was difficult, but when I tried to convince other editors to unblock me when user Blackmane gave me a three step guide on how to appeal it, I was about to do it next day, but when I woke up, I realized my talkpage access was revoked per IDHT. Like, apparently I can't sleep, and

1811:

To be absolutely honest, I don't see why my name even keeps cropping up here. Looking over the sago of your block log it appears to have started years before I got involved and I seem to have been just one of many blocking you for the same reasons. We can't all have been wrong.

1349:

and I kept my word. After this block will expire, I will only do constructive edits because after a year of a block I understood that such behavior was wrong, and if it will happen again, the ArbCom will be the next step. As for racial remarks, I will keep my mouth shut and will remain civil no

578:

1417:

People overreact, and yes, my comment was quite extreme, but I am surprised that people don't believe that editor's behavior can change, considering that it was a year since. All I want is to write more articles and not to insult or argue with you all. And if I promise I wont overreact, I wont

1525:

Thanks for explanations. As I said before, all the racism thing was out of frustration and had nothing to do with you in person or user Kingofaces43, or anyone. I should have took a break back then, and will do it if I will have another frustrating day. Either way, my talk page is clean from

740:. As for extensive block history, how did you managed to convince them to unblock you? Like, I need to assume that non of your blocks were probably as bad as mine, but still... Also, maybe its not polite of me to ask, but since we are such good friends here maybe I can have your Skype?-- 1619:

You claim that someone has falsely claimed to have taken action for a stated reason when in fact that is just an excuse, and you don't think you have accused him of anything? The more I read of the endless nonsense you post the less of a case I think there is for unblocking you.

1827:

To be honest Kudpung I don't see the reason why would anyone remove talkpage access simply because a person tries to convince other admins to unblock them (that's the reason why your name continues cropping here). As far as I remember I was blocked for personal attacks and

2374:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1772:

And now the mind-boggling personal attacks, false accusations, and trumped-up false reasoning, excuses, and lies have already started up. It simply seems that this user is incapable of interacting on Knowledge (XXG) without resorting to this behavior.

1757:

he will need to be consulted, possibly along with all the others. No need to ask me again though because at the moment I'm tied up with other stuff and I'll concur with any decisions made by any of the other admins involved here.

823:

suggests waiting at least six months and then requesting unblock, but there's no automatic expiry of block evasion after that time - you still need to actually make the request and not edit until it is accepted. I will say that the edit summary at

940:. If I can't show you my good editing while being unblocked then the only way for me to show it, is to do it while being blocked. If you would have been blocked for 6 months, waited patiently, and didn't got unblocked, what would you have done?-- 1232:

of what I will do differently). I'm asking for a second time this wonderful community to let me join. I promise that I wont talk back to the admins and I will head the warnings. In fact, before I was blocked I learned when and when not to use

467:

1439:

So, how long is this "time consuming process"? Also, if I get denied an unblock request does it means that the process will be halted or I would need to appeal again and then it will resume? And please, do not miss quote me as you did here:

2377:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has

1267:

reasonably expect. Since you were evading your block at least as recently as 18 July 2016, that means that you can request an unblock any time from 18 January 2017, if there has been no other block evasion that I don't know about.

1319:

other editors without thinking about the rules (which is not very common with me). As for my sockpuppet accusations, I admit my wrong here too and it was not nice of me to do it because it too was in violation of our policies.

548:

2050: 801:, but lets compromise, shall we? Did I ever did a single harm to the project while doing it? No. And plus, how else will I prove that my behavior have changed? By waiting another 6 months after being blocked for 761:

No, I wasn't evading a block, in fact as my contributions go, I started doing it only after 6 months of being blocked and then I got bored because I want to write the articles too, and I can only do it with my

2069: 2064: 1470:

And I probably shouldn't have pinged any of you, but keeping me blocked wont prevent anything except for stirring a kind of abuse of blocking privileges (if such policy exists). Many thanks in advance.--

1499:

The "time consuming process" would probably be around three or four hours given the history which needs to be examined; you need to write something which will convince whichever admin is patrolling

1350:

matter what will happen. So, if admins will be generous to give me another chance, I will take 2 more steps, in that I will be civil, competent and not disruptive (actually that will be 3 steps).--

2055: 579:

matter what will happen. So, if admins will be generous to give me another chance, I will take 2 more steps, in that I will be civil, competent and not disruptive (actually that will be 3 steps).-

919:

said that 6 months is enough and I proved it. Yes, block evasion is not allowed, and I completely agree on it, but despite the evasion, I showed good faith, which I didn't got in return. :( Plus

1787:

The personal attacks are coming from you Softlavender. I'm capable of interacting on this project. At least I don't go and accuse people of lying like you did. I'm personally offended by this.--

2189: 2171: 1448:

and I literally translated what he said. Am I not allowed to translate someone's comments? But perhaps you probably wont be able to comment on the second sentence, so I probably should ping

2370: 1955: 1947: 2185: 2167: 2156: 1951: 2180: 2138: 1418:

overreact. I think that a second chance after a long block worth a try. People should look not at what I did or said in the past, but what I did in the past couple months.--

736:

Thanks, but simple Knowledge (XXG) is too simple. Like, there is more stubs then full blown articles, and its almost impossible to make them as good as here because its

2147: 911:

because of this? Whoa, hold on, so what I said above didn't really matter? I wasn't editing talkpages while being blocked and showed many constructive edits. Even user

2152: 2201: 2176: 2134: 2318: 1365:

I spent more then a year being blocked, and while I did came and edit some articles a month prior to an unblock request, I did it out of my competence prove.--

1307:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1095:

that the extent of the block log would amply justify a community discussion, even if procedurally it doesn't strictly require it. Make of that what you will.

536:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2359: 2143: 1899:

due to my inability of reading "between the lines". If anyone of you would have explained it the same way as Guy did, I wont even started that debacle. :)--

902:"What you showed us is that you have not been able to respect Knowledge (XXG) policies even after you were blocked. That gives me no reason to unblock you." 281: 240: 182: 2301: 2104: 214: 1484:

If you're going to accuse me of selective misquotation, you probably shouldn't try to rebut it with a selective misquotation. Your exact words were

970:, as you were already blocked. I just declined your unblock request. You are free to make new request and wait for some other admin to review it. 1381:

I see that I've been pinged, but I don't have much to say. I went out on a limb the last time I unblocked you, and I'm not going to do it again.

675:...while being blocked I have managed to edit many articles by archiving them. During that time of anonymous editing I did no harm to the project 1508:

it means your appeal is still live—if a request is explicitly declined, you'll be removed from the category and need to file a fresh request. ‑

829:

here have been unreasonable - you were a very difficult editor to deal with, and you repeatedly refused to listen to what you were being told.)

1292: 521: 2113: 1504:

means that the process will be halted or I would need to appeal again and then it will resume?", as long as you still see yourself listed at

1877:

Guy explained me the reason, will keep this page clean and block request free until next year. Thank you for not removing my TPA again. :)--

805:, even though I tried everything to convince people to unblock my account??? I don't want to wait another 6 months if my behavior is good.-- 2100: 244: 1186: 703: 421: 313: 1674:

You ask me to explain the reason for a block, but I see no point in explaining once again what has already been explained to you. You

2305: 243:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

1388: 1851:

Constant unblock requests is actually one of the most reasons why TPA is revoked, because it smacks of "asking the other parent".

2109: 252: 1325: 554: 204: 176: 140: 1324:

All of the actions that I did above were wrong because they all were in gross violation of our rules and guidelines, such as

553:

All of the actions that I did above were wrong because they all were in gross violation of our rules and guidelines, such as

2293: 2237: 2215: 161: 1060: 1505: 1500: 834: 781: 720: 690: 2297: 152: 1181: 416: 308: 200:

on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

144: 2363: 2001: 1159: 394: 277: 652: 124: 91: 1153: 820: 495: 388: 1158:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

393:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

248: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 57: 50: 45: 40: 490: 1077:

Extra note. The above is not a comment on the substance of the unblock request itself but a procedural question.

1337:

As for what I will do differently, I already moved one step. Back when I was first blocked in April, I promised

566:

As for what I will do differently, I already moved one step. Back when I was first blocked in April, I promised

219: 103: 845: 830: 792: 777: 756: 716: 699: 686: 2023: 236: 2355: 2340: 155:

for page creation, and may soon be deleted. thank you mishae for your contributions!:) THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!

2122: 656: 2280: 2246: 1678:, and I see no reason to think you are likely to understand if the same explanation is given to you again. 776:

Editing logged out while your account is blocked *is* evading your block - it's the very definition of it!

1778: 1689: 1631: 1584: 1278: 147:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like 2309: 1706:

if you will give this explanation in step-by-step I will get it. So far I am getting some points straight

2385: 1385: 977: 505: 229: 2233: 2219: 2329: 1976: 1605:

accusation had to do with my second block? Am I not allowed to convince editors into unblocking me?--

1200: 435: 327: 1125: 1109: 1082: 1068: 1013:

I have been to that road before... I tried multiple requests last time, and then I was blocked for

2250: 1891:

I also would like to apologize for any personal attacks, accusations, and excuses, to Kudpung and

936:, I have tried to wait out 6 months without editing, but user Kudpung blocked me off the whim for 2118: 1806: 109: 2017: 2011: 1995: 1989: 602:

to intervene in this discussion since I know him for a long time, because he understands me?..--

2276: 1894: 1817: 1774: 1762: 1701: 1685: 1642: 1627: 1595: 1580: 1545: 1274: 962:". You were editing as soon as last month. Six months without editing means, well, six months 370: 2391: 1833: 1739: 1675: 1653: 1602: 1551: 1014: 937: 802: 2381: 1451: 1382: 1340: 1301: 1008: 972: 931: 897: 569: 530: 500: 304: 192: 105: 23: 2263: 2254: 1829: 1346: 1329: 1233: 1059:

Procedural question to admins. Mishae was blocked for a month per the community discussion

575: 558: 468: 209: 2325: 1520: 1509: 1434: 1412: 1402: 1397:

is better served in places other than considering whether someone who makes comments like

1101: 922: 862: 707: 648: 634:

for a little while and then get a fresh perspective before coming back tot his edition? —

1121: 1078: 1064: 186:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 2317:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

2262:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

1859: 1853: 1738:

1. I shouldn't ask why I was blocked by Kudpung because that will be in violation of

224: 1872: 1813: 1758: 1601:

anyone just voicing my opinion and stating a fact. Because really folks, what does

1569: 366: 1742:. 2. I should not comment on my talkpage till the above mentioned date from you.-- 966:

editing. Also, I don't understand what consensus you are talking about. I did not

160:

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the

1900: 1878: 1838: 1788: 1743: 1661: 1606: 1555: 1527: 1471: 1457: 1419: 1366: 1351: 1245: 1237: 1164: 1034: 993: 941: 866: 806: 763: 741: 670: 621: 603: 580: 472: 399: 287: 148: 1959: 1024: 914: 731: 635: 597: 1832:

then after 6 months of waiting I appealed and got blocked again from you per

1943: 353: 685:", are you saying you have been editing logged out and evading your block? 2286:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

269: 706:. I'll hold off on hardblocking it while this discussion is ongoing. ‑ 107: 1869:

Thanks Guy, that explains. Will wait quietly till next year. :) Sorry

1554:

which in my opinion was just another excuse on not unblocking me. :(--

2200:

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter,

1652:

in a civil manner I will get unblocked. Instead, I was reblocked per

358:

was submitted on Jul 18, 2016 22:52:08. This review is now closed.

2396: 2333: 1926: 1908: 1886: 1864: 1846: 1821: 1796: 1782: 1766: 1751: 1693: 1669: 1635: 1614: 1588: 1573:

whether making more such accusations is likely to help your cause.

1563: 1535: 1512: 1479: 1465: 1427: 1405: 1391: 1374: 1359: 1282: 1253: 1129: 1115: 1086: 1072: 1042: 1001: 983: 949: 874: 838: 814: 785: 771: 749: 724: 710: 694: 661: 611: 588: 511: 374: 256: 174:

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

631: 479:) 3:57 am, 19 July 2016, Tuesday (1 month, 10 days ago) (UTC+2) 110: 17: 2371:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Vladimir Ivanov (model)

180:. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the 2224: 2065:

Feature: High-Level Article trends in the past decade or two

2044: 1982: 1144: 797:

Didn't knew that after 6 months it will still be considered

379: 268: 1314:

Since somebody told me, I should write it in detail, here:

543:

Since somebody told me, I should write it in detail, here:

2358:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

1289:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

518:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1309:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

538:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2354:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2304:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1657: 1648: 1490: 1485: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1195: 1191: 1177: 1173: 1169: 825: 627: 449: 445: 439: 430: 426: 412: 408: 404: 341: 337: 331: 322: 318: 300: 296: 292: 2269:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

626:

I have a suggestion (and take it from someone with an

1152:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

387:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1676:

didn't understand what was being said to you before

1495:whether beetles are covered by WikiProject Insects 1656:which in my opinion came out of nowhere. Here is 1487:individual is being treated like a piece of shit. 1031:I have tried to wait out 6 months without editing 960:I have tried to wait out 6 months without editing 1446:As another user said on Russian Knowledge (XXG) 865:refs is dead, and I am in urge to archive it.-- 158: 151:, may not conform to some of Knowledge (XXG)'s 1401:is someone we want back on Knowledge (XXG). ‑ 280:is asking that their block be reviewed on the 118:This page has archives. Sections older than 8: 1120:That's more or less what I figured. Cheers. 594:If its OK with the community, may I ask for 247:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 1919:WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020 235:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 2360:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2275:notice, but please explain why in your 2090: 245:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 1934:The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter 1445: 1441: 1398: 1030: 1018: 967: 959: 955: 128:when more than 5 sections are present. 1837:please don't take it the wrong way.-- 954:I don't understand what you mean by " 7: 2321:of each individual page for details. 2051:Changes to Featured and Good content 1938:Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020 1442:Knowledge (XXG) is hijacked by kikes 1399:Knowledge (XXG) is hijacked by kikes 704:Special:Contributions/184.97.251.58 220:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2264:deleted for any of several reasons 2240:because of the following concern: 1647:Fine, I will shut up, but do read 630:): maybe you could try writing on 143:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 2368:The article will be discussed at 1681:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1623:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1576:The editor who uses the pseudonym 1270:The editor who uses the pseudonym 122:may be automatically archived by 2348: 2204:to update the distribution list. 1958: 1942: 1925: 851: 22: 1909:15:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1887:14:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1865:14:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1847:13:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1822:10:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1797:13:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1783:08:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1767:06:56, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1752:14:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1694:10:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1670:00:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 1636:20:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 1615:20:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 1589:16:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 1564:14:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 1536:04:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 1513:09:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC) 1480:01:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC) 1466:02:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC) 1283:12:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 677:" means. What do you mean by " 257:01:52, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 1506:Category:Requests for unblock 282:Unblock Ticket Request System 210:Biographies of living persons 2056:News items and announcements 1568:If you know so little about 673:, I'm really not sure what " 215:How to write a great article 2308:allows discussion to reach 2289:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2272:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 1491:Removed BS by a fascist Jew 1428:19:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC) 1406:17:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1392:16:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1375:15:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1360:15:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1254:01:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1156:, who declined the request. 1043:22:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1002:19:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 984:18:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 950:18:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC) 907:Really? You can't trust me 512:23:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 391:, who declined the request. 183:New contributors' help page 2412: 2397:22:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 2390:If you reply here, please 2334:10:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2300:exist. In particular, the 1489:, immediately followed by 992:O.K. I'll wait, civilly.-- 2294:proposed deletion process 1444:. My initial comment was 1293:guide to appealing blocks 1130:04:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC) 1116:04:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC) 1087:03:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC) 1073:03:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC) 875:12:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 839:12:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 815:12:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 786:12:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 772:12:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 750:12:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 725:09:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 711:09:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 695:08:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 662:04:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 612:02:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 589:02:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 522:guide to appealing blocks 375:22:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC) 2362:or whether it should be 1904: 1882: 1842: 1792: 1747: 1665: 1610: 1559: 1531: 1475: 1461: 1423: 1370: 1355: 1249: 1241: 1038: 997: 968:block you out of my will 945: 870: 810: 767: 745: 607: 584: 476: 2356:Vladimir Ivanov (model) 2341:Vladimir Ivanov (model) 2281:the article's talk page 628:extensive block history 2260: 2229: 2129:VG Project Departments 1493:(in an argument about 1149: 1021:", I was quoting user 384: 273: 166: 125:Lowercase sigmabot III 2306:articles for deletion 2242: 2238:proposed for deletion 2228: 2095:VG Project Main pages 1326:WP:Disruptive editing 1201:change block settings 1148: 555:WP:Disruptive editing 436:change block settings 383: 328:change block settings 272: 249:ConcernedVancouverite 928:consensus. You know 715:Aha, I see, thanks. 1979:, the project has: 1971:Project At a Glance 1055:Procedural question 846:Boing! said Zebedee 831:Boing! said Zebedee 793:Boing! said Zebedee 778:Boing! said Zebedee 757:Boing! said Zebedee 717:Boing! said Zebedee 700:Boing! said Zebedee 687:Boing! said Zebedee 139:Hello, Mishae, and 2298:deletion processes 2230: 2086:Project Navigation 2070:Interview: Zxcvbnm 1150: 1019:6 months is enough 956:6 months is enough 385: 354:UTRS appeal #16170 274: 205:Your first article 177:Your first article 145:your contributions 2216:Proposed deletion 2209: 2208:(Delivered ~~~~~) 2186:Video game images 2168:Reference library 2079: 2078: 2033: 2032: 2012:Featured Pictures 1990:Featured Articles 1863: 1810: 1683: 1625: 1578: 1272: 1140:Unblock request 2 821:WP:Standard Offer 683:anonymous editing 496:WP:standard offer 132: 131: 97: 96: 2403: 2395: 2352: 2351: 2322: 2291: 2290: 2274: 2273: 2234:Robert F. Fudali 2227: 2220:Robert F. Fudali 2207: 2110:Project category 2045: 1983: 1963: 1962: 1946: 1939: 1935: 1929: 1898: 1876: 1857: 1804: 1705: 1679: 1646: 1621: 1599: 1574: 1549: 1524: 1455: 1438: 1416: 1344: 1306: 1300: 1268: 1220: 1218: 1207: 1189: 1187:deleted contribs 1147: 1114: 1112: 1106: 1105: 1028: 1012: 980: 975: 935: 926: 918: 901: 859: 855: 854: 849: 796: 760: 735: 660: 643: 625: 601: 573: 535: 529: 508: 503: 491:WP:Block evasion 455: 453: 442: 424: 422:deleted contribs 382: 357: 356: 347: 345: 334: 319:abuse filter log 316: 314:deleted contribs 198: 197: 191: 170: 127: 111: 37: 36: 26: 18: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2389: 2379: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2316: 2302:speedy deletion 2288: 2287: 2271: 2270: 2225: 2223: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2197: 2194: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2080: 2041: 2034: 2002:Featured Topics 1973: 1966: 1965: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1921: 1892: 1870: 1814:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1759:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1699: 1640: 1593: 1543: 1518: 1449: 1432: 1410: 1338: 1312: 1304: 1298: 1297:, then use the 1286: 1257: 1208: 1198: 1184: 1167: 1160:blocking policy 1145: 1142: 1110: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1057: 1022: 1006: 978: 973: 929: 920: 912: 895: 863:Vladimir Ponkin 852: 850: 843: 790: 754: 729: 646: 637: 619: 595: 567: 541: 533: 527: 526:, then use the 515: 506: 501: 481: 443: 433: 419: 402: 395:blocking policy 380: 363: 352: 351: 335: 325: 311: 290: 264: 262:Unblock request 195: 189: 188: 172: 168: 123: 112: 106: 31: 12: 11: 5: 2409: 2407: 2347: 2346: 2344: 2339:Nomination of 2337: 2312:for deletion. 2292:will stop the 2222: 2213: 2206: 2198: 2196: 2195: 2193: 2192: 2183: 2174: 2164: 2163: 2160: 2159: 2150: 2141: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2116: 2107: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2067: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2053: 2043: 2037: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2026: 2020: 2014: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1998: 1996:Featured Lists 1992: 1981: 1974: 1969: 1967: 1948:Previous issue 1940: 1936: 1931: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1889: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1542:Good to know, 1379: 1378: 1377: 1334: 1333: 1321: 1320: 1287: 1264: 1260:Decline reason 1229: 1225:Request reason 1222: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1097: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 987: 986: 904: 903: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 752: 679:archiving them 667: 666: 665: 664: 592: 591: 563: 562: 550: 549: 516: 488: 484:Decline reason 464: 460:Request reason 457: 378: 361: 349: 267: 263: 260: 241:sign your name 233: 232: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 162:Article Wizard 157: 130: 129: 117: 114: 113: 108: 104: 102: 99: 98: 95: 94: 88: 87: 82: 77: 71: 70: 65: 60: 54: 53: 48: 43: 33: 32: 27: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2408: 2399: 2398: 2393: 2387: 2383: 2376: 2373: 2372: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2342: 2338: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2313: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2284: 2282: 2278: 2267: 2265: 2259: 2258: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2241: 2239: 2235: 2221: 2217: 2214: 2205: 2203: 2191: 2187: 2184: 2182: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2102: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2091: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2054: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2040: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2019: 2018:Good Articles 2015: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1980: 1978: 1972: 1964: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1928: 1918: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1896: 1890: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1874: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1855: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1835: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1808: 1807:edit conflict 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1703: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1650: 1644: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1624: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1597: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1577: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1547: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1522: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1453: 1447: 1443: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1414: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1342: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1303: 1296: 1294: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1263: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1228: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1212: 1206: 1202: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1178:global blocks 1175: 1174:active blocks 1171: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1155: 1154:administrator 1139: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1107: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1054: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1026: 1020: 1016: 1010: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 985: 982: 981: 976: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 952: 951: 947: 943: 939: 933: 924: 916: 910: 906: 905: 899: 894: 893: 876: 872: 868: 864: 858: 847: 842: 841: 840: 836: 832: 827: 822: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 794: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 775: 774: 773: 769: 765: 758: 753: 751: 747: 743: 739: 733: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 709: 705: 701: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 669: 668: 663: 658: 654: 650: 645: 641: 633: 629: 623: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 609: 605: 599: 590: 586: 582: 577: 571: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 546: 545: 544: 540: 539: 532: 525: 523: 514: 513: 510: 509: 504: 497: 492: 487: 485: 480: 478: 474: 470: 463: 461: 456: 451: 447: 441: 437: 432: 428: 423: 418: 414: 413:global blocks 410: 409:active blocks 406: 401: 396: 392: 390: 389:administrator 377: 376: 372: 368: 362: 359: 355: 348: 343: 339: 333: 329: 324: 320: 315: 310: 306: 302: 301:global blocks 298: 297:active blocks 294: 289: 284: 283: 279: 271: 266: 261: 259: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 202: 201: 199: 194: 185: 184: 179: 178: 171: 165: 163: 156: 154: 150: 146: 142: 137: 136: 126: 121: 116: 115: 101: 100: 93: 90: 89: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 61: 59: 56: 55: 52: 49: 47: 44: 42: 39: 38: 35: 34: 30: 25: 20: 19: 16: 2380: 2369: 2367: 2343:for deletion 2315: 2314: 2296:, but other 2285: 2277:edit summary 2268: 2261: 2244: 2243: 2232:The article 2231: 2199: 2101:Main project 2074: 2038: 2036: 2028: 1970: 1968: 1932: 1895:Softlavender 1852: 1803: 1775:Softlavender 1755: 1737: 1702:JamesBWatson 1686:JamesBWatson 1680: 1658:that comment 1649:this comment 1643:JamesBWatson 1628:JamesBWatson 1622: 1596:JamesBWatson 1581:JamesBWatson 1575: 1546:JamesBWatson 1498: 1494: 1456:if its OK?-- 1313: 1308: 1290: 1288: 1275:JamesBWatson 1269: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1230: 1224: 1223: 1196:creation log 1163: 1151: 1076: 1058: 971: 963: 908: 856: 798: 737: 682: 678: 674: 639: 593: 542: 537: 519: 517: 499: 489: 483: 482: 465: 459: 458: 431:creation log 398: 386: 364: 360: 350: 323:creation log 286: 278:blocked user 275: 265: 234: 187: 181: 175: 173: 167: 159: 138: 134: 133: 119: 28: 15: 2382:Classicwiki 2153:Peer review 2024:Good Topics 1452:Vanjagenije 1383:Writ Keeper 1345:not to use 1341:Writ Keeper 1009:Vanjagenije 974:Vanjagenije 932:Vanjagenije 898:Vanjagenije 681:"? And by " 574:not to use 570:Writ Keeper 502:Vanjagenije 149:4X4: Hummer 2326:FastilyBot 2202:click here 2177:Newsletter 2135:Assessment 1956:Next issue 1521:Iridescent 1510:Iridescent 1435:Iridescent 1413:Iridescent 1403:Iridescent 1192:filter log 1104:Salvidrim! 923:Iridescent 762:account.-- 708:Iridescent 427:filter log 305:autoblocks 237:Wikipedian 225:Help pages 169:Thank you. 153:guidelines 92:Archive 10 2378:finished. 2310:consensus 2247:SCIENTIST 2236:has been 1975:As of Q1 1698:Well OK, 1501:this page 1291:read the 1211:checkuser 1170:block log 1122:Blackmane 1079:Blackmane 1065:Blackmane 826:this edit 520:read the 446:checkuser 405:block log 338:checkuser 293:block log 239:! Please 85:Archive 9 80:Archive 8 75:Archive 7 68:Archive 6 63:Archive 5 58:Archive 4 51:Archive 3 46:Archive 2 41:Archive 1 2324:Thanks, 1497:, ffs). 1182:contribs 1029:and by " 636:Justin ( 417:contribs 309:contribs 230:Tutorial 135:Welcome! 29:Archives 2392:ping me 2364:deleted 2319:history 2144:Cleanup 2039:Content 1873:Kudpung 1834:WP:IDHT 1740:WP:IDHT 1654:WP:IDHT 1603:WP:IDHT 1570:Kudpung 1552:WP:IDHT 1302:unblock 1205:unblock 1015:WP:IDHT 964:without 958:" and " 938:WP:IDHT 803:WP:IDHT 799:evasion 632:simple: 531:unblock 440:unblock 367:UTRSBot 332:unblock 193:help me 141:welcome 120:31 days 2279:or on 2251:SIGCOV 2245:Fails 2119:Portal 2016:1,522 1901:Mishae 1879:Mishae 1839:Mishae 1830:WP:CIR 1789:Mishae 1744:Mishae 1662:Mishae 1607:Mishae 1556:Mishae 1528:Mishae 1472:Mishae 1458:Mishae 1420:Mishae 1367:Mishae 1352:Mishae 1347:WP:IAR 1330:WP:NPA 1246:Mishae 1238:Mishae 1234:WP:IAR 1165:Mishae 1035:Mishae 1017:. By " 994:Mishae 979:(talk) 942:Mishae 867:Mishae 807:Mishae 764:Mishae 742:Mishae 738:simple 702:, see 671:Mishae 622:Mishae 604:Mishae 581:Mishae 576:WP:IAR 559:WP:NPA 507:(talk) 494:you a 473:Mishae 469:WP:IAR 400:Mishae 288:Mishae 1952:Index 1860:Help! 1295:first 1025:Koavf 915:Koavf 732:Koavf 598:Koavf 524:first 276:This 2386:talk 2330:talk 2190:talk 2181:talk 2172:talk 2157:talk 2148:talk 2139:talk 2123:talk 2114:talk 2105:talk 1988:233 1977:2020 1905:talk 1883:talk 1843:talk 1818:talk 1793:talk 1779:talk 1763:talk 1748:talk 1690:talk 1666:talk 1632:talk 1611:talk 1585:talk 1560:talk 1532:talk 1476:talk 1462:talk 1424:talk 1371:talk 1356:talk 1328:and 1279:talk 1250:talk 1242:talk 1126:talk 1083:talk 1069:talk 1061:here 1039:talk 998:talk 946:talk 909:only 871:talk 857:Done 835:talk 819:The 811:talk 782:talk 768:talk 746:talk 721:talk 691:talk 608:talk 585:talk 557:and 477:talk 371:talk 253:talk 2255:GNG 2218:of 2022:28 2010:33 2000:10 1994:84 1854:Guy 1688:" ( 1630:" ( 1583:" ( 1277:" ( 1215:log 1162:). 450:log 397:). 342:log 2366:. 2332:) 2283:. 2266:. 2253:, 2249:, 2188:– 2179:– 2170:– 2155:– 2146:– 2137:– 2121:– 2112:– 2103:– 1954:| 1950:| 1907:) 1885:) 1845:) 1820:) 1795:) 1781:) 1765:) 1750:) 1692:) 1668:) 1634:) 1613:) 1587:) 1562:) 1534:) 1478:) 1464:) 1426:) 1373:) 1358:) 1305:}} 1299:{{ 1281:) 1262:: 1252:) 1227:: 1209:• 1203:• 1199:• 1194:• 1190:• 1185:• 1180:• 1176:• 1172:• 1128:) 1108:· 1100:· 1085:) 1071:) 1041:) 1000:) 948:) 873:) 837:) 813:) 784:) 770:) 748:) 723:) 693:) 642:vf 638:ko 610:) 587:) 534:}} 528:{{ 498:. 486:: 462:: 444:• 438:• 434:• 429:• 425:• 420:• 415:• 411:• 407:• 373:) 365:-- 346:) 336:• 330:• 326:• 321:• 317:• 312:• 307:• 303:• 299:• 295:• 285:: 255:) 196:}} 190:{{ 164:. 2394:. 2388:) 2384:( 2328:( 2257:. 1903:( 1897:: 1893:@ 1881:( 1875:: 1871:@ 1862:) 1858:( 1841:( 1816:( 1809:) 1805:( 1791:( 1777:( 1761:( 1746:( 1704:: 1700:@ 1684:" 1664:( 1645:: 1641:@ 1626:" 1609:( 1598:: 1594:@ 1579:" 1558:( 1548:: 1544:@ 1530:( 1523:: 1519:@ 1474:( 1460:( 1454:: 1450:@ 1437:: 1433:@ 1422:( 1415:: 1411:@ 1389:♔ 1386:⚇ 1369:( 1354:( 1343:: 1339:@ 1332:. 1273:" 1248:( 1240:( 1219:) 1217:) 1213:( 1168:( 1124:( 1111:✉ 1098:☺ 1081:( 1067:( 1037:( 1027:: 1023:@ 1011:: 1007:@ 996:( 944:( 934:: 930:@ 925:: 921:@ 917:: 913:@ 900:: 896:@ 869:( 848:: 844:@ 833:( 809:( 795:: 791:@ 780:( 766:( 759:: 755:@ 744:( 734:: 730:@ 719:( 689:( 659:☯ 657:M 655:☺ 653:C 651:☮ 649:T 647:❤ 644:) 640:a 624:: 620:@ 606:( 600:: 596:@ 583:( 572:: 568:@ 561:. 475:( 454:) 452:) 448:( 403:( 369:( 344:) 340:( 291:( 251:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.