1073:, I received an email query about copyright violation but am not sure how to send my reply so I am putting it here. It appears to me the yuge problem about Dr Berzin's article jumped on by certain other editors is that a person unskilled in Knowledge editing (not me!) simply copied and pasted here the good Dr's potted bio from one of his websites without permission. Some pedantic watchdog accused this poor naive person of copyright violation and plagiarism. Someone wrote to the Dr to get his permission to use the potted bio which was willingly provided, but a mistake was made in that the permission was related to a different version of the potted bio. Again the warriors of righteousness leapt onto this horrible bungled effort to appease them and all sorts of nasty notices and deletions of text followed. What I suggest is that someone cobbles together a new potted bio roughly based on different potted bios that have been published about the good Dr o his websites old and new and on conferences he might have attended as a contributor or speaker. But it should be re-worded in a general manner to avoid the accusations of copyright violation and plagiarism by those who have it in for Dr Berzn and the people trying to write something about him here. Who, sadly, remind me of Trump's childish, nay, infantile rants and attacks on anyone he does not like. I started learning to be an WP editor on subjects I know a little about and am astonished at the unsympathetic attitudes taken by certain people who I would have thought ought to know better. But WP is like that, there are many good editors working here in friendly and enjoyable cooperation as well. We just have to take the rough with the smmooth. Please let me know how I can email back to you in case the dreaded WP ogres will now jump on me for breaking all the rules of civility and so forth here.
1781:
898:
1566:
1111:
607:
1293:
1480:
1049:
can simply restore it all, citing it to the webpage. At best it's a self-published, primary source. What we could use it to verify is extremely limited. I could write up an RfC around some imagined attempt to restore all the information from the biography, but I don't think there's any chance it would help. I don't see how we could do anything but repeat
457:
538:. Knowledge is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. Please comment on content, not on contributors when you contribute to article talk pages. If you want to discuss the behaviour of a fellow editor you can do this on his personal talk page or at
919:
Moonsell, I understand that you are unhappy with the discussion but additional personal attacks against Ronz may lead to complaints about your behaviour. You wrote "The first attack, in late July 2016 began with trolling contributors here with tags ." Accusations ("trolling") without evidence (diffs)
1048:
I'm not clear on how a proper RfC can be made around this dispute. Obviously, there is objection over the removal of the copyright-violating content. I've not paid too much attention, but I believe there were some efforts to put the biography that was copied into public domain. That doesn't mean we
993:
Talk of trolling has upset you both especially. You've found it hurtful. I've been reticent all along to call it that. From my side, it's taken me a year to spit it out. Thank you for your measured responses but once again, please, please, reread the talk carefully from the beginning. Even at this
1712:
In the first paragraph of our article I count at least 21 assertions. Not one of them is sourced. Is this bad? No, because "all" and "everything" in this rule can't be taken literally. Wouldn't WP trivialize itself if it insisted on citations for things that aren't controversial, let alone things
999:
What comes across clearly to me as edit warring is not the same thing as being outraged about it and I once heard something that's hard to forget: "The standard you walk past is the standard you accept." Ronz has had ample scope to reassure us he wasn't trolling as well as all the rest: above all
981:
b) the problem of what to expect from you in future. There are other more important articles which I worry are not safe from this treatment. Some touch on the content (that once was) of the Berzin article. They are quality things that have developed over years and that quality is what's at
1757:
think the fact is obvious, another editor didn't. That would seem glaringly obvious to me. I was not the editor who added the citation request, as you imply. Any editor has the right to do so, and no editor has the right to remove the request without supplying the citation. Don't be lazy,
1123:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1578:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
987:
I've seen editing like this on a smaller scale before and in consequence I find I've taken a back seat on WP more and more, as I have till lately on the Berzin article. Ronz's most recent post in the talk vividly revives the question in my mind of what we can expect from you in
1818:
Someone put the tag on three years ago. No one knows why. We could root around trying to find a source, but the claim in the article has never been disputed. I don't understand what way we can call that a challenge. And where would one even go about looking for a
723:
2. I started the discussion respectfully, helpfully, assuming good faith on your talk page. You weren't interested but specifically didn't want the talk there. You yourself four months ago started the new discussion where it is. Now is not the time to chop and
759:
My concern with your question is that it has nothing to do with improving this encyclopedia in any way, nor do I see how it improves our working together. Maybe you could explain why you asked the question and what you want to achieve by discussing the topic?
1181:
youre anywhere with anyone else on the understanding of things as they are found - I dont think you'll get many answers - there is a peculiar smell to the range of articles and the confusions that arise between content and context - anyone's guess imho.
872:
I see no purpose to your further comments at this point. Could you please stop them? We're getting no where with the discussions here and on the article talk page. There are other steps you can take to resolve whatever dispute you still see, outlined in
619:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1696:
Thanks for the comment on your revert of the tag, Skyerise. I'm not going to insist on my edit since it doesn't matter. You base your insistance on WP:V, though. This does matter as it could create misunderstanding for us in
1191:
I have found earlier comments you have made - not sure I can either help or offer any counsel on the issues you raise - the nature of the beast is best to walk away for a while, and come back in a manner of speaking.
1005:
There's something missing here and it's a worry. Actions speak louder than words, so to look at the Berzin article now… Don't trivialise this. Above all, we need you to reassure us about what we can expect from you in
733:
3. From the start I tried to give you a heads-up about sensitivities with the editing you were hinting at. Now it doesn't concern just you and me and the question has become a crucial one, particularly in that
1606:
1151:
647:
1725:
In the 3 years that this tag's been in place, you're the first person who's found this controversial. But what would anyone want to object to? WP:V is poorly written and our only course of action is common
1716:
2) The second bit narrows it down: "material challenged or likely to be challenged". This is what I meant by "relevant objection". WP looks just silly if it sources things that no one would object to.
1590:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1135:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1050:
631:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1703:"all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations."
1753:. The act of adding a citation needed tag is, by definition, a "relevant objection". The editor who added it wants to know where to verify the stated fact. It doesn't matter whether
1416:
41:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
966:
Behaviour is another matter. I promise you, I don't criticise capriciously and not for its own sake. There has to be something important at stake to drag me out of my shell.
683:
To answer your question on how I came across the article: I looks like I was investigating the spamming and promotion of studybuddhism.com against a conflict of interest by
571:
Thank you for the advice, Jim. Not only are the things you urge timely, but the way you write is a model for how I need to get a grip on my words that is even more powerful.
832:
I've asked some simple questions to clarify if you are even reading my responses and to determine what purpose these discussions serve. You are choosing not to answer? --
1414:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
914:
1532:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
1332:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
159:
994:
stage, don't just scan. Ask yourself if you're really seeing the other side and give some sign that you are. Please take the time to see what the talk is saying.
1404:
961:
Jim and Ronz, we're all volunteers here. If we met we might well be friends. I have no problem with either of you personally. If you think I have, show me how.
63:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving
Knowledge you might want to consider being "
1762:
There's an official warning for that, which I didn't use because I was trying to be kind, but since you like to
Wikilawyer, I will post it after this reply.
1505:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
1253:
203:
72:
1706:
There are two things here: "all material" and "material challenged or likely to be challenged". They're not the same. Let's take them one by one.
1450:"wrong source." Definitely not appreciated. Please respect Wiki-policies, and discuss this at the talkpage. And let me remind you that you were
946:, and instead focus on finding a solution to this dispute. Any problems if I reverted it, and started an RfC to review the content changes? --
920:
is regarded as a personal attack and I do not expect that you can provide evidence which might convince administrators that Ronz is guilty of
1346:
If you now believe the draft cannot meet
Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
1249:
1620:
1165:
661:
1023:
Ask yourself if you're really seeing the other side and give some sign that you are. Please take the time to see what the talk is saying.
680:
has nothing to do with improving the article in any way, could you please remove it? It should have been placed on my talk page instead.
1822:
The tagged assertion is a commonplace and as I said, it doesn't matter. I saw my edit as just a bit of work by a volunteer, cleaning up.
971:
As you know, I have never contributed to the Berzin article, and we all know it's not an important one. However, there are two problems:
348:
1025:
If you've ever tried to do this, I must have missed it. Apparently, you've missed mine. Are you interested in addressing this yourself?
432:
370:
357:
1501:
In accordance with our policy that
Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
1547:
60:
1616:
1328:
1299:
1280:
1161:
941:
906:
813:
657:
531:
524:
384:
199:
177:
694:
254:
194:
38:
1651:
Thanks for taking the time to post here, Hipal. I have no idea what you mean, though. Did you revert something? Best wishes.
1383:
902:
352:
304:
1599:
1426:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
1321:
1144:
640:
322:
308:
127:
1495:
1473:
1347:
1340:
1284:
1611:
1542:
1239:
1156:
652:
424:
291:
215:
976:
a) the ethics of the editing practices I feel you've made a show of there. It's all in the talk and not just by me.
924:. Please make better use of your time and improve the article with reliable, independent secondary sources. Thanks
380:
282:
232:
228:
181:
131:
16:
1722:"Atiśa's chief disciple, Dromtön founded the Kadampa school of Tibetan Buddhism, one of the first Sarma schools.."
1461:
250:
211:
1785:
756:
I have no idea what you want at this point. It's not clear to me that you have read and understand my response.
406:
402:
237:
190:
1636:
Hi
Moonsell. I'm not sure what to say here that can help the situation. I hope this won't escalate further. --
1792:, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
1302:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by
Heliosxeros was:
481:
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
330:
219:
186:
495:
it implies a discontinuity between Indian and
Tibetan Buddhism, the term has been discredited.<ref: -->
326:
317:
286:
121:
88:
64:
34:
1749:. Once it has been challenged, the citation needed tag may not be removed without providing a citation,
1587:
1132:
1078:
628:
366:
361:
68:
1235:
1533:
1455:
1243:
1226:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
543:
514:
258:
224:
54:
1502:
684:
415:
313:
299:
245:
154:
1536:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
1805:
1767:
1686:
1422:
1305:
930:
688:
559:
535:
295:
117:
1793:
1574:
1420:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
1269:
1119:
615:
597:
376:
84:
78:
1360:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
1051:
Knowledge:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive245#Alexander_Berzin_.28scholar.29
1789:
1681:
to be cited. There doesn't have to be a "relevant objection" to support a citation request.
1583:
1491:
1427:
1389:
1354:
1227:
1128:
1074:
624:
470:
1598:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1446:
You've removed valuable information twice now; the second time without any discussion, but
1143:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
639:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1641:
1193:
1183:
846:
I'll assume then you choose not to answer. Could you please withdraw the question then? --
510:
506:
461:
428:
1246:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1797:
1595:
1317:
1309:
1140:
1058:
1036:
951:
882:
851:
837:
793:
779:
765:
702:
636:
547:
419:
410:
241:
50:
71:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1825:
1801:
1763:
1732:
1682:
1654:
1591:
1487:
1260:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1205:
1136:
1089:
1070:
1009:
926:
913:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
818:
743:
632:
580:
555:
539:
149:
1313:
1265:
1261:
874:
551:
1780:
1565:
1403:
1110:
1029:
Above all, we need you to reassure us about what we can expect from you in future.
897:
606:
1674:
1329:
Knowledge:What Knowledge is not#Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought
1292:
505:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
1637:
1815:
Thanks for the elaboration, Skyerise. Please can we keep this non-aggressive.
940:
I think it might be best for you to revert your most recent contributions to
1054:
1032:
947:
878:
847:
833:
789:
775:
761:
698:
1796:. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
1751:
even if that requires duplicating the citation at the end of the paragraph
1673:
Please never just remove a citation request unless you supply a citation;
1308:
than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in
1088:
I see. It's obviously gotten quite convoluted. Maybe it's just too hard.
921:
75:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to
1602:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1147:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
643:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1486:
Hello, Moonsell. It has been over six months since you last edited the
59:
1833:
1809:
1771:
1740:
1690:
1662:
1645:
1624:
1553:
1466:
1432:
1394:
1273:
1213:
1196:
1186:
1169:
1097:
1082:
1062:
1040:
1017:
955:
934:
886:
855:
841:
826:
797:
783:
769:
751:
706:
665:
588:
563:
518:
92:
474:
1000:
that he gets it with other people's values and won't bulldoze them.
812:
Ronz, this is playing games. You know the discussion is already at
1231:
1605:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1339:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
1150:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
646:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1506:
1539:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.
269:
104:
24:
1478:
1291:
877:. Could you choose some alternative, or simply move on? --
816:. It has been ongoing for four months and is not finished.
1350:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "
1745:
Once someone has added a citation request, the material
1384:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
1363:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
1586:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1507:
1451:
1447:
1373:
1365:
1230:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1131:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
944:
678:
627:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
482:
478:
466:
1343:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
530:
Hello, I noticed that you made a comment on the page
477:
by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
673:Your question at Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
490:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
53:and ask your question there. Please remember to
8:
67:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
1709:1) "WP:V requires everything to be cited."
1222:Disambiguation link notification for May 5
1713:that are common knowledge among scholars?
1045:I've gone ahead and removed the comment.
1788:from pages on Knowledge, as you did to
1204:Thanks for those thoughts, JarrahTree.
155:Where to ask questions or make comments
1454:for edit-warring at Tibetan Buddhism.
1316:. Please write about the topic from a
1028:
1022:
917:and keep this in mind while editing.
714:1. Once again that's not informative.
464:. I have automatically detected that
7:
1700:WP:V is actually confusing. It says:
1575:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1120:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
616:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1326:The comment the reviewer left was:
1304:This submission reads more like an
546:are not really helpful. Please see
1719:The tag comes here in the article:
1559:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1298:Your recent article submission to
1104:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
1474:Draft:Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
1348:Draft:Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
1341:Draft:Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
1779:
1632:Regarding your most recent edits
1564:
1402:
1109:
896:
605:
455:
58:
20:
1609:and submit your choices on the
1572:Hello, Moonsell. Voting in the
1417:Articles for creation help desk
1367:Articles for creation help desk
1154:and submit your choices on the
1117:Hello, Moonsell. Voting in the
942:Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
907:Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
814:Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
613:Hello, Moonsell. Voting in the
532:Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
525:Talk:Alexander Berzin (scholar)
160:Request administrator attention
1098:02:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
1083:17:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
1063:00:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
905:other editors, as you did at
589:23:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
564:22:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
1834:04:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
1625:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1588:Knowledge arbitration process
1554:05:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
1133:Knowledge arbitration process
887:17:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
784:18:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
770:17:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
752:04:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
707:19:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
666:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
629:Knowledge arbitration process
204:Biographies of living persons
122:The five pillars of Knowledge
100:
1467:13:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
1334:when they have been resolved
1312:and not contain opinions or
1170:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
856:01:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
842:00:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
827:22:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
798:16:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
37:to Knowledge! Thank you for
1810:19:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1772:19:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1741:04:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1691:09:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
1663:03:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
1496:Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
1310:secondary, reliable sources
1285:Schools of Tibetan Buddhism
1041:20:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
1018:04:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
956:15:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
935:00:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
650:and submit your choices on
229:Policy for non-free content
1850:
1646:16:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
1617:MediaWiki message delivery
1214:01:42, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
1197:12:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
1187:12:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
1162:MediaWiki message delivery
658:MediaWiki message delivery
648:the candidates' statements
554:for more info. Thank you
507:these opt-out instructions
150:Frequently Asked Questions
93:17:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
57:on talk pages by clicking
868:Could you please move on?
1829:
1736:
1658:
1209:
1093:
1013:
822:
747:
584:
519:01:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
501:Conze, 1993</ref: -->
1433:09:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
1395:09:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
1274:09:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
483:my operator's talk page
358:Pages needing attention
353:Help develop an article
169:Policies and Guidelines
1483:
1296:
677:Because your question
534:that didn't seem very
1786:maintenance templates
1784:Please do not remove
1584:Arbitration Committee
1488:Articles for Creation
1482:
1318:neutral point of view
1300:Articles for Creation
1295:
1281:Articles for creation
1129:Arbitration Committee
788:Still no response? --
697:). Why do you ask? --
625:Arbitration Committee
598:ArbCom Elections 2016
200:What Knowledge is not
178:Neutral point of view
1472:Your draft article,
1375:reviewer's talk page
1262:opt-out instructions
473:may have broken the
371:Translating articles
287:Adopt-a-user program
255:Conflict of interest
195:No original research
1747:has been challenged
1508:edit the submission
1494:page you started, "
1322:encyclopedic manner
1279:Your submission at
1240:fix with Dab solver
305:No personal attacks
77:always fill in the
1600:arbitration policy
1484:
1297:
1252:• Join us at the
1242:). Such links are
1145:arbitration policy
641:arbitration policy
600:: Voting now open!
367:Join a WikiProject
349:Be bold in editing
309:Resolving disputes
118:Knowledge Tutorial
39:your contributions
1669:Citation requests
1439:
1438:
1382:You can also use
1314:original research
1257:
1244:usually incorrect
448:
447:
444:
443:
440:
439:
292:Assume good faith
266:
265:
216:Three-revert rule
99:
98:
83:. Happy editing!
1841:
1790:Tibetan Buddhism
1783:
1568:
1550:
1545:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1521:
1516:
1515:
1510:
1481:
1464:
1458:
1442:Tibetan Buddhism
1406:
1399:
1398:
1378:
1370:
1359:
1353:
1247:
1236:check to confirm
1228:Tibetan Buddhism
1113:
900:
609:
500:
486:
471:Tibetan Buddhism
459:
458:
425:Useful templates
283:Community Portal
270:
233:Image use policy
182:Reliable sources
105:
101:
62:
47:
46:
25:
21:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1671:
1634:
1629:
1628:
1569:
1561:
1548:
1543:
1525:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:and remove the
1479:
1477:
1462:
1457:Joshua Jonathan
1456:
1452:blocked in 2014
1444:
1435:
1397:
1372:
1364:
1357:
1351:
1331:
1325:
1289:
1254:DPL WikiProject
1224:
1179:
1174:
1173:
1114:
1106:
1031:Who is "us"? --
894:
870:
774:No response? --
675:
670:
669:
653:the voting page
610:
602:
528:
496:
465:
456:
453:
395:
341:
314:Build consensus
275:
251:Deletion policy
212:Manual of Style
170:
142:
132:upload an image
110:
109:Getting Started
95:
44:
43:
12:
11:
5:
1847:
1845:
1837:
1836:
1823:
1820:
1816:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1652:
1633:
1630:
1607:the candidates
1570:
1563:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1490:submission or
1476:
1470:
1448:simply stating
1443:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1409:
1407:
1388:
1387:
1380:
1361:
1344:
1327:
1303:
1290:
1288:
1277:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1178:
1175:
1152:the candidates
1115:
1108:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1046:
1043:
1026:
1007:
1002:
1001:
996:
995:
990:
989:
984:
983:
978:
977:
973:
972:
968:
967:
963:
962:
939:
901:Please do not
893:
890:
869:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
786:
757:
738:
737:
736:
735:
728:
727:
726:
725:
718:
717:
716:
715:
674:
671:
611:
604:
603:
601:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
575:
574:
573:
572:
527:
522:
503:
502:
492:
491:
452:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
438:
437:
436:
435:
422:
413:
397:
396:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
373:
364:
355:
343:
342:
339:
336:
335:
334:
333:
320:
311:
302:
289:
277:
276:
273:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
248:
238:External links
235:
222:
208:
207:
206:
197:
191:Citing sources
184:
172:
171:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
157:
152:
144:
143:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
124:
112:
111:
108:
97:
96:
55:sign your name
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1846:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1817:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1800:. Thank you.
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1782:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1731:
1728:
1724:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1711:
1708:
1705:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1631:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1567:
1558:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1546:
1537:
1535:
1530:
1509:
1504:
1499:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1475:
1471:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1459:
1453:
1449:
1441:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1425:
1424:
1419:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1369:
1368:
1362:
1356:
1349:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1330:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1301:
1294:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1221:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1176:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1112:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1003:
998:
997:
992:
991:
986:
985:
980:
979:
975:
974:
970:
969:
965:
964:
960:
959:
958:
957:
953:
949:
945:
943:
937:
936:
932:
928:
925:
923:
916:
912:
909:. Comment on
908:
904:
899:
891:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
867:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
815:
811:
810:
809:
808:
799:
795:
791:
787:
785:
781:
777:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
758:
755:
754:
753:
749:
745:
742:
741:
740:
739:
732:
731:
730:
729:
722:
721:
720:
719:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
693:
690:
686:
681:
679:
672:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
649:
644:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
621:
618:
617:
608:
599:
596:
590:
586:
582:
579:
578:
577:
576:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:Walls of text
541:
537:
533:
526:
523:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
499:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
484:
480:
479:edit the page
476:
472:
468:
463:
450:
434:
430:
426:
423:
421:
417:
414:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:Miscellaneous
392:
391:
386:
382:
378:
375:Cleaning up:
374:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
356:
354:
350:
347:
346:
345:
344:
338:
337:
332:
331:Mailing lists
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
303:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:The Community
272:
271:
268:
260:
256:
252:
249:
247:
243:
239:
236:
234:
230:
226:
223:
221:
220:Sock puppetry
217:
213:
210:
209:
205:
201:
198:
196:
192:
188:
187:Verifiability
185:
183:
179:
176:
175:
174:
173:
167:
166:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
139:
138:
133:
129:
125:
123:
119:
116:
115:
114:
113:
107:
106:
103:
102:
94:
90:
86:
82:
80:
74:
70:
66:
61:
56:
52:
48:
40:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
19:
18:
1794:edit summary
1778:
1759:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1729:Best wishes.
1678:
1672:
1635:
1610:
1604:
1581:
1573:
1571:
1540:
1538:
1531:
1520:{{db-draft}}
1500:
1485:
1445:
1428:
1421:
1415:
1411:
1390:
1374:
1366:
1333:
1259:
1225:
1190:
1180:
1155:
1149:
1126:
1118:
1116:
1069:
938:
918:
910:
895:
871:
817:
691:
682:
676:
651:
645:
622:
614:
612:
529:
504:
497:
454:
433:User scripts
407:Disambiguity
340:Things to do
327:IRC channels
318:Village pump
141:Getting Help
85:Gimme danger
79:edit summary
76:
42:
30:
15:
1612:voting page
1544:Abelmoschus
1463:Let's talk!
1157:voting page
1075:MacPraughan
892:August 2017
734:discussion.
460:Hello, I'm
362:Peer review
128:edit a page
69:WikiProject
1679:everything
1596:topic bans
1549:Esculentus
1526:{{db-g13}}
1514:{{db-afc}}
1371:or on the
1264:. Thanks,
1248:(Read the
1194:JarrahTree
1184:JarrahTree
1141:topic bans
637:topic bans
511:BracketBot
509:. Thanks,
462:BracketBot
420:Talk pages
416:User pages
403:Categories
259:Notability
225:Copyrights
45:{{helpme}}
1677:requires
1592:site bans
1534:this link
1503:mainspace
1137:site bans
915:stay cool
633:site bans
467:your edit
385:Vandalism
300:Etiquette
246:Vandalism
51:talk page
1826:Moonsell
1802:Skyerise
1798:reverted
1764:Skyerise
1760:cite it!
1733:Moonsell
1683:Skyerise
1655:Moonsell
1423:Teahouse
1412:Moonsell
1206:Moonsell
1090:Moonsell
1071:Moonsell
1010:Moonsell
927:JimRenge
922:Trolling
819:Moonsell
744:Moonsell
695:contribs
685:Buziatov
581:Moonsell
556:JimRenge
451:May 2016
323:Signpost
296:Civility
126:How to:
49:on your
31:Moonsell
17:/Sandbox
1819:source?
1697:future.
1529:code.
1410:Hello,
1355:db-self
1287:(May 6)
1266:DPL bot
1006:future.
988:future.
911:content
724:change.
548:WP:TALK
377:General
65:adopted
35:Welcome
29:Hello,
1726:sense.
1320:in an
982:stake.
903:attack
540:WP:ANI
475:syntax
1638:Hipal
1523:, or
1492:Draft
1306:essay
1177:tibet
875:WP:DR
552:WP:DR
536:civil
429:Tools
411:Stubs
81:field
1830:talk
1806:talk
1768:talk
1737:talk
1687:talk
1675:WP:V
1659:talk
1642:talk
1621:talk
1582:The
1498:".
1429:EROS
1391:EROS
1270:talk
1232:Chan
1210:talk
1166:talk
1127:The
1094:talk
1079:talk
1059:talk
1055:Ronz
1053:. --
1037:talk
1033:Ronz
1014:talk
952:talk
948:Ronz
931:talk
883:talk
879:Ronz
852:talk
848:Ronz
838:talk
834:Ronz
823:talk
794:talk
790:Ronz
780:talk
776:Ronz
766:talk
762:Ronz
748:talk
703:talk
699:Ronz
689:talk
662:talk
623:The
585:talk
560:talk
550:and
515:talk
381:Spam
242:Spam
89:talk
73:here
1755:you
1250:FAQ
469:to
1832:)
1808:)
1770:)
1739:)
1689:)
1661:)
1644:)
1623:)
1615:.
1594:,
1517:,
1358:}}
1352:{{
1336:.
1283::
1272:)
1256:.)
1238:|
1212:)
1168:)
1160:.
1139:,
1096:)
1081:)
1061:)
1039:)
1016:)
954:)
933:)
885:)
854:)
840:)
825:)
796:)
782:)
768:)
760:--
750:)
705:)
664:)
656:.
635:,
587:)
562:)
542:.
517:)
431:•
427:•
418:•
409:•
405:•
383:•
379:•
369:•
360:•
351:•
329:•
325:•
316:•
307:•
298:•
294:•
285:•
257:•
253:•
244:•
240:•
231:•
227:•
218:•
214:•
202:•
193:•
189:•
180:•
130:•
120:•
91:)
33:!
1828:(
1804:(
1766:(
1735:(
1685:(
1657:(
1640:(
1619:(
1541:―
1460:-
1386:.
1379:.
1324:.
1268:(
1234:(
1208:(
1164:(
1092:(
1077:(
1057:(
1035:(
1012:(
950:(
929:(
881:(
850:(
836:(
821:(
792:(
778:(
764:(
746:(
701:(
692:·
687:(
660:(
583:(
558:(
513:(
498:(
485:.
87:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
