User talk:Nanite - Knowledge

345:

photoelectric cell. And yes, the diode would be performing work in our non-infinite impedance voltmeters (unless you have it at absolute zero) - (think Peltier, photovoltaic effects, etc.) The cooler and smaller the junction, the higher the voltmeter impedance needed to sense the built-in potential. Again, the potentials at the metal-semiconductor and semiconductor-metal junctions around our diodes were cancelled out due to the symmetry of the contact electrode materials used, and fairly the same constant temperature of the junctions. The statement: "if a voltmeter is attached to the junction, one simply measures zero" in the article is incorrect. The measurements are very close to the calculated voltages. So please eliminate that false statement or correct it accordingly. Thank you.

285:). However, that statement is wrong, and one simply DOES NOT measure zero there. I haven't had access to that reference but, with a p-n junction, there is an internal potential which is caused by the workfunction difference between the n-type and p-type semiconductors. This potential equals the built-in potential (which is typically about 0.7 volts for silicon at room temp). The built-in potential is explained in Knowledge's article on "p–n junction" and I use that as a reference. Also, please see 214:(critically, equation 7.30 and 7.33 assume very large reservoir). Nothing is assumed for the subsystem. That's why the final result is the exact probability distribution for the state of the subsystem, whether the subsystem is very large or finite. Note that the canonical ensemble can only be derived using a very similar approximation for a large heat reservoir (the critical approximation is made in Huang's equation 7.3, regarding reservoir entropy). Again, it too applies for finite subsystems. 2245:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 8608: 3293: 2143: 3149: 3097: 2433: 8518: 3203: 3011: 2885: 2562: 2487: 2256: 1264: 131:, the canonical ensemble is guaranteed to yield the same distribution as the result above, in the limit of a large number of particles. Indeed, as shown in the below derivations, once one makes the approximation of a large particle number they arrive at the Fermi-Dirac distribution. For small particle number, however, the Fermi-Dirac statistics are not exactly derivable from the canonical ensemble." -- 1809: 289:. Also, I just measured the voltage of several p–n junctions myself using an actual modern digital voltmeter, and none is zero (thermocouple effects are cancelled due to the symmetry of the contact electrode materials used and constant temperature) and they are very close to the calculated voltages. So please eliminate that false statement or correct it accordingly. Thank you. 1501: 614: 3166:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3114:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2450:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 112:, what is your source for the statement, "The reason for the inaccuracy is that the total number of fermions is conserved in the canonical ensemble, which contradicts the implication in Fermi–Dirac statistics that each energy level is filled independently from the others (which would require the number of particles to be flexible)"? Regards, -- 2345: 191:, any claim that the derivation using the grand canonical distribution is exact, and any implication resulting from that claim, such as that the derivation using the grand canonical distribution is more exact than the derivation using the canonical distribution, will be removed or rewritten because it is unsourced. -- 2326:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering

878:

I have a couple minor patches I would like to submit to your thermocouples_reference python module. Since I couldn't find a better way of getting in touch with you, they are pasted below. The first one allows the module to work under python 2.6. The second fixes an error in inverse_CmV when Tstart

855:

You can do original research on Wikiversity. It is a very quiet and obscure place where you can tinker around with ideas for articles. Your thoughts on Gibbs paradox are in a somewhat obscure place in Wikversity (obscure!) Someday, Knowledge will have a good (or at least mediocre) article on every

851:

I thought I would go off the subject of our discussion of Gibbs paradox. I am an ex plasma physicist who left Solid State physics in my first year of graduate school because the theory seemed incomprehensible. For example, where was the proof that electrons accelerated according to their 'effective

80:

I admit I didn't look it up and just derived it myself, as I thought it was a pretty straightforward derivation. I mainly wanted to clean up some of the mess on the page with the previously posted derivations. I looked around and I found some other instances of the grand canonical approach (e.g., the

1864:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

2219:

The AfC tool does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this tool, you may ask any administrator to remove your account from the list at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator.

1742:

regardless of what I answer, you wouldn't believe me. By the way, the courteous way to handle this would have been "Hey, I am slightly worried that you're editing logged out. If so, please see policy X and Y. If I'm mistaken, I apologise for the suspicion!" instead of trying to find out a user's IP

924:

The article "Open statistical ensemble" is very important although this issue has not been discussed in the literature. The fact that the grand canonical ensemble has a significant drawback - a fictitious surface at the boundary of the volume inherited from the canonical ensemble. Look a little new

160:

Sort of yes and sort of no. It's true that to have continuous parameters of temperature and chemical potential we need a big reservoir to supply energy and particles, respectively. In that sense, both the canonical ensemble and grand canonical ensemble are thermodynamic-limit approximations because

2330:

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and

1221:

Definitely it makes sense a working journalist doesn't deserve WP article, they're not really a public person anymore than a scientist. They just do their job and their name appears as author. However in Lauren's case I don't think she could be called a working journalist. At a rough glance she is

377:

If you read up on Seebeck effect you'll find that it only occurs where there are temperature differences (regardless of whether one of the temperatures is zero). That is a non-equilibrium situation, as is the case of the photovoltaic effect. If you are measuring a nonzero voltage with a voltmeter,

2088:

Hmmmm. Could've sworn I've seen domains (or, I guess, just urls) hijacked before, with some market or carding forum or something. It may be that it was hosted by a third party and someone got into the account with that third party or something, I guess? I've also seen a lot of "that one has been

306:

Was your voltmeter in volts mode (applying zero current), or was it in diode mode (applying nonzero current)? I tried this test as well just now and I measure less than 1 mV (0 within error) on a silicon PN junction diode, using a modern digital multimeter in DC volts mode (the multimeter has an

344:

My voltmeter was in volts mode (applying zero current). Your problem with your test is that you used a voltmeter with an input impedance of only around 10 Mohm (a so called low cost multimeter). Either use a high impedance voltmeter or a larger size p-n junction, such as a large photodiode or a

172:

If I wanted to compute the statistics of a noninteracting fermion system with, say, only four available single-particle states, I'll still get exactly Fermi-Dirac statistics if I use GCE; alternatively I can use CE with a large particle reservoir attached, however that would essentially involve

692:. Writing an article about a technical topic for a general audience is, needless to say, but one thing that helps is to include a section on practical applications. Is thermal transpiration an important part of any consumer products or manufacturing? I feel this would greatly help the article. 145:

Note that the derivation using the grand canonical distribution, involves essentially the same approximation as the derivation using the canonical distribution, because that is how the grand canonical distribution was derived. See Eqs. 4.4 and 4.21 in Srivastava & Ashok, which use Taylor

217:

Given that the grand canonical ensemble gives the exact probability distribution for any system (small or large) which is in equilibrium for exchange of particles and energy with an ideal reservoir (reservoir with fixed chemical potential and temperature), the two-line quickie derivation of

2268:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

325:

is zero (zero applied voltage, i.e., neither forward or reverse bias), the situation is that in Fig. 4.2.3: a junction in thermal equilibrium with zero current. If you insist to think about things in terms of Galvani potentials, remember that there are also built-in potentials at the

2499:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

378:

then the part is out of equilibrium for some reason (input bias current of voltmeter, temperature differences, light shining on, etc.). Let me know which model of voltmeter you're using, and which kind of diode you're measuring, under what conditions, and we can figure this out.

2184:

reviewers which gives you access to the Helper Script. Reviewing of submitted drafts is a function for helping new users to understand how to comply with article guidelines and/or notability and approving or declining new articles. Please be sure to read the tutorial at

2019:

Only a little bit familiar with the site. Not ideal, but probably good enough. That said, wouldn't a defunct site's url be at least somewhat likely to be hosting some other (potentially problematic) content now? I'm not sure what encyclopedic purpose it would serve? —

210:, but that might be illegal to obtain if you don't own a physical copy.). Anyhow, the grand canonical ensemble for sure does get derived with a large number approximation (for a total system composed of large reservoir plus subsystem), but that approximation is taken 1222:

splitting her time between editorializing on Rebel Media and social media activism. (Actually I was not aware of the former aspect, previously I only knew of her through her activism role.) Also she had a hand in politics as a candidate for the Libertarian party.

1276:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

205:

Well, google books isn't letting me look at that chapter of the Srivastava book, so I'll have to refer you to another one, Kershon Huang's "Statistical mechanics" (2nd edition, 1987). (One could possibly find an online copy of it by searching for

86: 1406:

My apologies, I didn't expect there could possibly be a huge discussion on this word "false" and so I didn't check the talk page. I agree it's false but I think it's silly to include that word. On this point I will leave a comment on the

1383:

Please see the extensive discussions on the article talk page, BLP noticeboard and elsewhere; there is both widespread consensus and policy support for clearly and directly stating the falsity of the claims involved in that matter.

787:

Ah, my bad. I didn't realize nonrectifying junction linked to there as well, and it's a good point to emphasize that the article is mainly about semiconductors. The lead should be better now, let me know what you think.

417:

Voltmeters have large but finite internal resistances. You can't measure the built-in potential of a diode with one. If you could, that would violate energy conservation since a diode would be performing work.

960:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 8563: 3248: 3054: 2928: 2605: 2527: 2296: 2186: 1304: 277:

You provided a reference to the statement: "if a voltmeter is attached to the junction, one simply measures zero" (Page 404 of Sah, Chih-Tang (1991). Fundamentals of Solid-State Electronics. World Scientific.

1217:

Ah OK, I can't see the deleted article so I could only guess what was there beforehand. Thanks for the long explanation! I think I understand the situation and the speedy deletion makes sense, no complaints

21:

Hello, Nanite, and welcome to Knowledge! I would give you the usual welcome spiel but it looks like you've got just about everything figured out. The diagrams in particular look very nice; I usually use

1073:, from a reader's perspective, like the journalist should be considered notable — however, notability for our purposes is not determined by the simple fact of being able to verify that the topic exists. 381:

By the way, the semiconductor-metal junctions in a pn diode are usually very unsymmetrical (but it doesn't matter for equilibrium: the Fermi level is constant throughout). I think it's worth pointing out

1970:

Thanks for digging up some onion urls, but given there's no authority for them and they're highly subject to hijacking, phishing, etc. we really do need a very solid source to include them anywhere. IMO

1466:

I suspect our friend is less of a troll and more of an alienated Russian academic who doesn't understand that WP isn't for self promotion...but either way I couldn't resist a joke about underpants. ;-)

1096:

source is her own "our staff" profile on the website of her own employer — but a staff profile was the only sourcing that existed in Southern's article, and the article in fact was just a thinly-veiled

8547:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3232:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3038:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2912:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2589:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2511:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2280:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1288:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 852:

mass' when subjected to an electric field? (I now understand that the proof almost certainly exists somewhere, but an introductory book (e.g. Kittel) had no space to fill in every little detail).

1884:

I'm going to keep this on my talk page because it's part of a funny story. Have you ever had an edit war that was so notorious it got reported in the media? In two different places? Well, I have!

161:

they invoke a reservoir. On the other hand, I can still use the canonical ensemble to describe the probability distribution for a tiny finite system with only two energy states (e.g., a spin-1/2

65:, i.e. the part beginning with "Due to the non-interacting quality...", and ending with "...and thus gives the exact Fermi-Dirac distribution for the entire state of the system"? Regards, -- 41:

Yes, Ipe is my favourite. I have to admit it's a bit awkward to work with at times due to partial gui support, but if you like LaTeX then you can get along with its idiosyncrasies. :) --

2800:

I have found this optical transmittance value in Kuzmenko et al 2007 paper. But Nair et al 2008 paper indicates that graphene absorption (as a ratio of absorbed to incident energy) is

1885: 8532: 3217: 3024: 2898: 2575: 533: 2242: 2235: 489:

Although you've got Maxwell–Jüttner and Maxwell–Boltzmann with an en-dash, later you have Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein with a hyphen rather than an en-dash. I corrected this.

590:

Thanks for correcting the errors (I just copied the text from the MB distribution page and didn't pay much attention to the exact typesetting from the previous writers). --

566: 1520: 1152:

itself. And they're two of the most famous journalists in all of Canada. Conversely, we just AFDed an article about Elizabeth Renzetti, a colleague of Ibbitson's at the

390:

for the pn diode at equilibrium including metal leads and see whether you can make a different voltage - in any sense - between the metal leads. I've included my own. --

2190: 1924:. I'm just letting you know that this has been published, but if there is anything I can do to help, e.g. if you view the article as harassment, please let me know. 2037:, Hmm -- that's an interesting point that I hadn't considered. AFAIK it's difficult to replicate onion names in full as they're like crypto hashes. But they are 1786:

If you think there is a possibility of sockpuppetry, start a sockpuppet investigation. Otherwise it is counterproductive to have any discussion here about it.--

386:: "If, in discussing a semiconductor problem, you cannot draw an Energy Band Diagram, this shows that you don't know what you are talking about." Try to draw a 999:

Hi, thank you for starting the Spatial dispersion page. I will try to add some relevant points, citations and cross-link t with the metamaterial articles etc.

1909: 1887: 1236: 1772:

Haven't you heard the story of the two brothers - one always tells the truth and the other always tells lies. What question must you ask to get the truth?

1363:. I am by no means certain on this, but I think the idea is that it's better to err on the side of omission when BLP criminal allegations are concerned. -- 165:). In the same way I'd want to use grand canonical ensemble for a tiny system where states of different particle number are accessible, like electrons in a 127:

Well, good point, perhaps it's not stated quite precisely enough. A better way to state it might be something like "By the equivalence of ensembles in the

1334:

I understand their just allegations and may not be true but I'm pretty sure it's still relevant to have it there. If not can you explain why it's not?

173:

rederiving GCE along the way. What wouldn't work is to use the CE for the finite system alone (fixing the number of particles in the finite system). --

3352:. I also made a bit of minor improvements to create folders if none appears, and used matplotlib agg backend to prevent memory leak when run in a GUI. 2672: 2402: 2071: 1065:

Notability, for Knowledge's purposes, can be especially tricky when it comes to broadcast or print journalists. The fact that a viewer or reader can

365: 1528: 26:

but its formula support is pretty bad -- I guess I should check out lpe. Keep up the good work and let me know if you have any questions. Cheers,

1823:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 1172:, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and from www.elizabethrenzetti.com." line), and on a database search I landed a lot of hits where she was the bylined 638: 3178: 3126: 2462: 2668: 2398: 2212:

You will be asked by users to explain why their page is being rejected - be formal and polite in your approach to them, even if they are not.

1832: 8586: 3271: 3077: 2950: 2627: 2541: 2341:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

2310: 1318: 985: 368:

Sketch of band diagram for a pn diode at equilibrium including metal-semiconductor junction, pn junction, and semiconductor-metal junction.

348: 292: 452: 2063: 2715: 307:

input impedance of around 10 Mohm, for what it is worth). Actually you can see even in the link you provided, that the applied voltage

3579:# Very important number, smaller means more classical (finer-spaced discrete levels, larger means more quantum (fewer discrete levels) 1187:

The deletion also does not mean that nobody is ever allowed to recreate an article about her again — if somebody in the future can do

1232:

There is now some biographical information that can be gleaned in news articles, like the pee-on-head ones that came out recently: (

432:

Yep, what Nanite said. The diode test mode flows a current -- you couldn't do this with a galvanometer-type voltmeter for example.

3348:

I tried using your code for Wigner functions today. It seems some of the latest Python things broke parts of it. Specifically, the

1229:

and before long she'll definitely be past the threshold. I am a bit inclined to recreate the article but of course there's no rush.

769: 713: 2703: 672: 651: 8582: 3267: 3073: 2969: 2946: 2623: 2537: 2306: 2058:

In case you are as nerdy as me: I got curious and yes, they're thought to be un-replicatable. Apparently when facebook started

1555:

is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note.

1314: 981: 634: 3158: 3106: 1824: 282: 2834:

On a side note: shouldn't such defined values (along with reflectance) add to 100%? The reflectance would be then given by

772:

if it only applies to those. I'm not a physicist, and physics was not my best subject in school, so I defer to you. Thanks,

629:. Please help by adding sources to the article you created and by making it clear how the sources support the material. See 492:

Don't write \mathrm{exp}. Instead, write \exp. (And similarly with \log, \sin, \arctan, \max, \det, etc.) Contrast these:

2658: 2116: 1701:

To be clear if you are logging out to edit war, that is a violation of SOCK. This the courteous way to handle the concern.

1389: 2327:

information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

8556: 3241: 3047: 2921: 2751:

note on graphene specifying that the absorption value for normal-incident light on graphene in vacuum would be given by

2598: 2520: 2388: 2289: 1840: 1297: 2711: 2089:

hacked, the new one is here" comments around these articles. I wouldn't claim to have any technical insight, though. —

972:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

8568: 3253: 3162:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3110:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3059: 2933: 2610: 2532: 2446:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2301: 1844: 1309: 977: 856:

possible subject. Talented writers with offbeat ideas will have nowhere else to write than places like Wikiversity.--

1225:

At this time her notability is arguably borderline, yet I have a strong feeling she is on the rise as an icon of the

1975:

makes most any onion link problematic, but I think there's still consensus to include when we have good sourcing. —

1921: 891:

Hi David, thanks for the contribution! I incorporated your changes more or less and I'll put out a new version soon.

3167: 3163: 3115: 3111: 2451: 1777: 828:

Hello Nanite, I see you have done some work on the Criticality Accident article. Could you please have a look at

166: 1852: 829: 1233: 1913: 1401: 1385: 861: 697: 455:, some concerns about adherence to standard Knowledge conventions and standard conventions of TeX usage arise: 352: 296: 1069:

their name and face by watching or reading the very same media outlets we might be using as sources certainly

1045:

thanks for the invitation but I'll have to pass. I too am not an expert in quantum information. Best of luck.

2335: 1637:

Because if you are editing logged-out it's a kind of socking, and you need sanctioning. No answer yet I see.

8501: 3310: 2748: 2442: 2362: 2062:, a bunch of people were shocked that they got a full "vanity" address without garbage characters at the end 1341: 737: 580: 1164:

exist to the same degree, so her article was much more purely dependent on primary sourcing (the article's

760:

since I believe you mean that the terms are not equivalent. I take it that there is a difference between a

2654: 2059: 1857: 1836: 1835:

for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant

1820: 1552: 1116:

possible sources out there, so an article about them can't actually stand until they accomplish something

765: 721: 707: 255: 8544: 3229: 3035: 2909: 2586: 2508: 2384: 2277: 1773: 1656: 1515:, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several 1354: 1337: 1285: 689: 618: 606: 1623:

And why are you guys ripping out valid primary and secondary sources? This is extremely frustrating. --

502: 7835:# If it does, go to `wigframes` and check the last frame generated. Change this to that frame's index. 2201:

Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.

474:. One italicizes variables, but not digits and not parentheses or the like. This is consistent with 3331: 2662: 2646: 2645:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2392: 2375:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1952: 1933: 1536: 1527:

walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found

1092:

than her own employer, to qualify for a Knowledge article, and does not get to keep an article whose

668: 647: 196: 151: 117: 70: 286: 2189:

again, and if you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at

2157: 2091: 2034: 2022: 1992: 1977: 1828: 1787: 1191:

than the first version, and can bring stronger, more independent sourcing to support it, then they

973: 895: 857: 803: 693: 460: 128: 8625: 8497: 3325: 3306: 2359: 1791: 1532: 1169: 1148: 1004: 576: 412: 2215:

Remember that quality is quintessential to good reviewing. Take your time to review an article.

364: 8526: 3211: 3018: 2992: 2892: 2730: 2688: 2569: 2495: 2418: 2264: 2225: 1763: 1678: 1642: 1582: 1272: 1254: 1200: 949: 940: 811: 777: 540: 483: 279: 219: 8620:

Great diagrams on your Contributions page, both from technical quality and scientific depth!

1620:

Why the heck do you think you guys are entitled to know whether I'm editing while logged out?

463:, but the article doesn't say so, and doesn't say who Jüttner is. Those should be mentioned. 8575: 8540: 3260: 3225: 3066: 3031: 2940: 2905: 2866: 2617: 2582: 2504: 2273: 2067:. They claimed they were just lucky to get one where the garbage characters were not too bad 1874: 1706: 1597: 1560: 1548: 1524: 1360: 1281: 1135: 1027: 1019: 969: 953: 930: 837: 725: 437: 423: 263: 31: 8555:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3240:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3046:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2920:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2597:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2519:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2288:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2068: 1296:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 968:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 572:

The second form automatically provides proper spacing; the first does not. I changed this.

8607: 3822:# For the kinetic energy operator (-hbar^2/(2*m) * d^2/dx^2), the usual central difference 3186: 3134: 2470: 1947: 1928: 1508: 1126: 663: 642: 192: 147: 113: 66: 3292: 2665:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2395:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2142: 2074:

say it would take billions of dollars (and years of time) to duplicate an onion site. --

894:

I'm glad to hear someone is using the module. In case you find any more bugs, I created

633:

for how to do inline referencing. Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at

8552: 3237: 3043: 2917: 2707: 2594: 2516: 2376: 2285: 2206: 1861: 1652: 1512: 1444: 1408: 1293: 965: 957: 729: 630: 3780:# As an optimization we will throw away all high-energy eigenstates. They are going to 2831:

I would appreciate if you could explain how you derived this latter absorption value.

254:

do not correspond to either textbook definitions or the IUPAC definition (see thread:

8621: 8548: 3233: 3039: 2913: 2679:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2590: 2512: 2409:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2281: 2124: 1289: 1131: 1121: 1000: 961: 749: 741: 733: 1758:

Why wouldn't anyone believe you? What's the answer? - I will take it in good faith!

4788:# It's also straightforward to calculate rho_x (the position-basis density matrix). 2988: 2984: 2726: 2722: 2684: 2680: 2447: 2414: 2410: 2221: 1972: 1759: 1730: 1674: 1638: 1615: 1578: 1482: 1481:

Well, if you like it, go ahead. (I admit "troll" was probably a bit over the top.)

1461: 1448: 1212: 1196: 1081: 807: 773: 626: 387: 251: 162: 8517: 8486:# cmd='ffmpeg -framerate 24 -f image2pipe -i - -crf 20 -b:v 0 -an -c:v libvpx-vp9' 4722:# rho(t) = U(t) rho(0) U(t)^h so this is elementwise multiply by a phase shift. 3202: 3010: 2884: 2561: 2486: 2255: 1263: 1130:

in 2010 even though she'd already been a reporter for many years before that, and

2358:

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams,

2209:- they are often not aware of doing anything wrong, even if they used the Wizard. 1910:

Knowledge’s Left-Wing Editors Attempt to Minimize Evidence Supporting Google Memo

1869:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 5062:# could be included but that requires extra computation due to how they straddle 4149:# Use gaussian wavepacket pure states, then create a mixture with an uncertainty 3335: 2862: 2075: 2045: 2006: 1917: 1890: 1870: 1831:

among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See

1816: 1744: 1737: 1702: 1688: 1660: 1624: 1608: 1593: 1556: 1468: 1412: 1364: 1239: 1046: 1040: 1023: 926: 902: 833: 789: 622: 591: 433: 419: 391: 327: 259: 223: 188: 174: 132: 89: 42: 27: 2065: 1808: 1551:

about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The

1112:

For far more journalists than you might think, staff profiles are actually the

7286:# plot the significant (99.9%) Schmidt-decomposed pure states at times 0,0.5,1 3783:# be trash due to high spatial frequency (so finite-difference momentum is not 3387:- Create a density matrix by statistically superimposing various gaussian wave 3330:

Yes I like the Wigner one a lot, it is somehow mesmerizing. I just uploaded a

3182: 3130: 2466: 1651:

This is ridiculous. Stop harrassing me and threatening me with sanctions. See

1134:

didn't have a keepable article until we started being able to source him over

717: 5378:# Since input rho_x was hermitian, the wigner transform has no imaginary part 3381:- Just use full eigen-decomposition of the hamiltonian, don't bother with any 3375:

enough that pixelization doesn't become an issue (i.e., at least a few points

1124:, for example, didn't have a keepable article until she became the anchor of 4059:# This is basically the true hamiltonian we are going to model, with cutoff. 3393:- Calculate density matrix in energy basis at any time in future, easy since 1226: 3405:- then using a fourier transform trick (wigner distribution is just fourier 2336:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

1997:

No worries, I get ya. Just want to say one thing: my plan was to only add

326:

metal-semiconductor and semiconductor-metal junctions around the diode. --

2650: 2120: 23: 8559:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3244:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3050:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2924:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2601:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2523:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2292:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1500: 1300:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

8536:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3372:- Use a spatial finite-difference scheme with not too many pixels. Just 3221:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3028:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2902:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2579:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2002: 1687:

I have no obligation to answer that question. Please leave me alone. --

479: 1160:

be sourced to the same degree as Ibbitson can — RS coverage about her

5059:# The dropped 'x' elements contain mostly redundant information. They 4092:### Prepare a density matrix (in energy eigenvector space) for time=0 3825:# approximation will be used. These go on diagonal and off-diagonals. 621:. However, one of Knowledge's core policies is that material must be 314:

is defined as the difference between Fermi levels, divided by charge

6338:# draw marginal x- and p- probability distributions on edges of plot 3305:

Your videos are beautiful (especially the one on Wigner functions).

2155:

Thanks for diving in to improve Knowledge's Tor-related articles! —

1168:

cited source, in fact, was a generic "Biographical information from

8629: 8590: 8505: 4716:# unitarily evolve the rho_E -- easy since it's the energy basis so 3378:

per wavelength), but not so much that it becomes ridiculously slow.

3343: 3314: 3275: 3190: 3138: 3081: 2996: 2954: 2870: 2734: 2692: 2631: 2545: 2474: 2422: 2365: 2314: 2229: 2164: 2128: 2098: 2083: 2053: 2029: 2014: 1984: 1959: 1940: 1898: 1878: 1795: 1781: 1767: 1752: 1710: 1696: 1682: 1668: 1646: 1632: 1601: 1586: 1564: 1487: 1476: 1453: 1420: 1393: 1372: 1345: 1322: 1247: 1204: 1054: 1031: 1008: 989: 934: 910: 865: 841: 815: 797: 781: 701: 677: 656: 599: 584: 427: 399: 356: 335: 300: 267: 231: 200: 182: 155: 140: 121: 97: 74: 50: 35: 2977: 2973: 363: 2041:

hashes, so maybe it's possible. Interestingly, I found one phish

956:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

287:

http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter4/ch4_2.htm#4_2_3

187:

Seems like you didn't understand my last message. No matter. Per

8572:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 5034:# To do so we'll 'rotate the matrix' anticlockwise by 45 degrees 3257:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3144:

Orphaned non-free image File:Childs Play censored screenshot.jpg

3092:

Orphaned non-free image File:Childs Play censored screenshot.jpg

3063:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2968:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2937:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2702:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2614:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1946:

Whoops! I see from ANI that you've already been pinged on this.

1544: 1540: 1507:

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use

1447:. Arguing with a troll is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. 8562:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

8530:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

3247:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3215:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

3053:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2927:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2604:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2526:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2295:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1860:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 1303:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

5028:""" compute wigner transform of space-basis density matrix """ 3022:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2896:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

2380: 475: 8492:# cat wigframes/*.png | $ cmd -pass 2 -y out-full-20-vp9.webm 3366:

Quantum mixed state evolver, and wigner distribution plotter.

1673:

So were you editing logged-out? It's a very simple question?

3147: 3095: 2431: 1807: 1499: 383: 8489:# cat wigframes/*.png | $ cmd -pass 1 -f webm -y /dev/null 1330:

Why remove the section about Toby Turner rape allegations?

3798:### Calculate the Hamiltonian H = U + hbar^2 (d/dx)^2/2m 2573:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

2001:

links based on unreliable sources. What do you think of

218:

Fermi-Dirac statistics inherits that exactness. Anyway,

8543: