User talk:Norstrem

1988:

where the river empties into Northern Light Lake, also a distance of 17 miles. This range contains Brule and Eagle Mountains, Point 2266, the Brule Mountain firetower peak, and a host of other close-to or qualifying peaks. This range isn't as well defined as the main ridgeline of the hills, but is highly prominent over the plains to the south, the basin to the east, and the river valley and Brule Lake on the north. This map ought to give you an idea what I'm referring to:

312: 344: 380: 392: 1791: 1668: 1573: 1474: 1216: 1134: 404: 368: 452: 356: 464: 502: 1403: 517: 428: 416: 532: 487: 1984:

in the range. As you noted in the article, too, Grant and Winchell's note that the three peaks around 2266 were properly part of the range despite being south of the Brule River Valley is also confusing. Eagle Mountain seems colloquially refereed to as part of the hills by some individuals, but not by others.

194: 1983:

From my research, there doesn't seem to be any commonly accepted definition for which peaks are a part of the Misquah Hills. There's the Upham definition, but that's over a 100 years old and seems somewhat reliant on the erroneous Grant and Winchell determination that Point 2230 was the tallest peak

1823:

I tried logging in on another computer and none of the passwords I would ever have used for this site work. I can only get on now because I have a cookie saved on this computer, and when it expires I do not know how I will be able to maintain control of my account. Moreover, my e-mail for fixing this

1753:

Hey Norstrem, thanks for your concise and well-balanced contributions, especially concerning high points and waterways in and around the Superior National Forest. I think you're absolutely right that this area's internet coverage is way too tourist-focused; it has needed some help on Knowledge for a

2016:

Upham is old, but he's also the last major work to touch on the geology of the subject that I can find. I suspect some department of the U of M must have put something together at some point in history after him, but I can't find any such documents as of yet. I expect that, had Upham understood what

1994:

So, the point. To me this ridgeline would seem part of the Misquah Hills by proximity and similar elevation, common cultural association and geologic consistency. Have you found other sources that would refute this definition? What are your thoughts on it? Have you found other sources that could

1987:

Undoubtedly the main ridgeline runs 17-18 miles from Cherokee Lake to Lima Mountain and contains the peaks defined by Upham and identified as the hills by Grant's party. But it would seem that there is a parallel range, running south of the main ridgeline from roughly Tomash or Pine Lake east to

1305:

on page 523. Thus far this is the only source I can find to actually name a lake as the river's source, and I'd very much like to be able to put a real name down instead of the coordinates, but I can't very well do that presently, as I have no idea what they

2053:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1824:

is to an account that I lost control of in January of 11 when I had a security breach in several of my online accounts. I was surprised I hadn't fixed that here yet, but as you can see, I use this infrequently.

1053: 2017:

the true heights of the various hills were, he would have included those hills in the Misquah, but I have yet to really find any sources about the geography of the region dating to after the resurvey.

1615: 1446: 1375:

from the Minnesota DNR, you will see that Lake Gust is located in Township 62N R 3W, Secs 10, 11, 14, and 15, which is consistent with your source. And the topo map of the area around the lake found

1520: 1416: 1081: 1706: 873: 1376: 918: 770: 878: 294: 30: 25: 1058: 444: 439: 184: 783: 1077: 693: 738: 1947: 1937: 1297:

I would very much appreciate it if anyone who has experience reading old surveys could tell me what arcane system for demarcating geographic regions

1933: 963: 1333: 680: 1943: 2078: 1382: 1008: 1363: 1070: 26: 31: 1810: 1770: 1298: 968: 910: 833: 1980:

Thanks for all your great work on Minnesota geography. I have a question/point(s) of clarification for the Misquah Hills article.

563: 2074: 521: 516: 468: 463: 266: 238: 213: 208: 1940:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1239:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1157:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 1998:

Just some questions. Would love your ideas or feedback for the improvement of the article and general geographic knowledge.

1725: