1632:, and I’m seeking opinions/consensus on their origins. re There are a number of anomalies, such as the difference between a ‘blue’ and ‘white’ label, in reference to whether there is a difference between ‘Heir apparent &/or presumptive’ –and- ‘Prince of Wales.’ These anomalies stem from the label argent given to Thomas of Brotherton &c, as heir apparent to King Edward I. Was this the origin of a white label? Were Thomas and his descendants Princes of Wales (Mowbray was descended from the earls of Chester &c) ? Also, can you clarify the relationship between the arms of
1727:
31:
1444:
158:
Lord
Advocate, the Solicitor General for Scotland, the Attorney and Solicitors General for Ireland, the Vice-Chamberlain, Treasurer and Comptroller of the Household, Captain of the Gentlemen Pensioners, Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard, and Master of the Buckhounds. At some point I'll try to look these up in Hayden's book of dignities, but if you had those, that'd be useful.
1566:
1516:
830:
I've personally never noticed it before, and I'm just looking at your complaint on the admin noticeboard for incidents now. I don't think you can really ask people to fight your battles for you; the more people who remain objective in issues like this the better. If your argument is justified it will
1101:
Sorry, saw this on Choess's page; I can't find anything here, so i'm assuming he didnt reply. "Sir" with GBE, KBE, so on refers to a knighthood; the postnomials aren't included because they aren't part of a title per se. "Sir X Bt." is a
Baronetage, a different title where the full format is "Sir X,
430:
do say pages on minor fictional characters should be merged, but s/he is taking it way too far. I personally think the style "List of... " is rather unencyclopaedic anyway. I suppose I could just expand all the individual characters' articles until the merged pages become indisputable candidates for
268:
Opera hat, the practice of using style X, nth Earl of Y has been rejected in practice by wikipedians for medieval
Scottish comital lordships. This system is English in origin, and can only be used in that country because of the Norman conquest. Earldoms such as Orkney or Angus were not new creations
157:
Thanks for the explanation. I've been trying to compile a list similar to the one you made for the Duke of
Wellington's 1828-1830 administration (in a word document currently), and was uncertain what to do about lords of the admiralty. Currently, my list is missing the Judge Advocate General, the
699:. Your input is requested there. This is a neutrally worded notification sent to a small number of editors informed by a previous discussion of a similar nature about the article "Flag of Europe" and is intended to improve rather than to influence the discussion. This notification falls under the "
862:
Dear Donald, I thought that you read the entire discussion on the above mentioned topic. There you would be able to find many different oppinions regarding the name of that article. I would support your actions but not toward the Aimone, Duke of
Spoleto. He was best known in the historiography as
168:
Well, I guess my situation with Hayden's is considerably better than yours - I have access to it at my university library. Sadly, and rather absurdly, given the limited interest in it, it is a reference book that can't be taken out - this is particularly absurd given that one can take out things
1333:
Well I'm sorry you think I had a tone with you but maybe I should have. I remember the part you are talking about but if you watch the film again there is a scene in
Winston's house and he has guests over and young lady is talking to a man who is referred to as the Duke of Marlborough. So if you
959:
Thank you for responding so quickly! Yes, you're right about Calais, but who could explain that to her when she can't understand the difference between regent and regnant? Opera, she will undo my edit regardless of what reason I give for removal of those titles. Could you please support me and
647:
Marshal, but the Duke of
Suffolk was granted the role for the purposes of the list in question (Mowbray could hardly fulfil the role himself when he was also a combatant). Suffolk also took over the role permanently when Mowbray was exiled. Also, I was wrong to conclude that Shakespeare's Lord
882:
Hiya. I notice that some of the series 4 characters on the
Blackadder template have (presumably posthumous) VCs MCs etc (and Melchett a string of honours) — but I can't find citation for any of them! Where do they all come from? Do you know? Or perhaps know someone else I can ask? Cheers
1329:
who lived from 1897 to 1972 with the 1st Duke of
Marlborough who died in 1722. There is no way a man who died in 1722 is contemporary with the cast of this movie that takes place in the 1930's. Research the person a little more before you make a edit. Thank you. Have a nice day.
1334:
think your right and I'm wrong you need to re edit the page so that people will know that it is an ancestor not contemporary. I will watch the film again tonight and if I am wrong I'll admit it but you need to add that it is an ancestor. Thank you Have a great day.
1580:, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
113:
Something" you naturally use the article, while if you're "Viscount
Something" you don't. But then for the Earls and Marquesses without "of" in their title I just did the Earl and marquess standard. Which do you think would be the better way to standardize?
1019:
Oh, too bad. Do you happen to know someone who knows something about non-free images and things like that? As for Catherine, I am really glad you joined the discussion. It was simply impossible to revert her edits ten times a day and keep a cool
445:
and will more than likely be changed back to the individual articles. I don't suggest expanding the pages too much. They'd reach a point of being full of absolutely trivial info like what color their dress was in certain scenes or whatever.
169:
like the Complete Peerage and so forth from my university library. At any rate, thanks for the help - I'll try to figure it out on my own - most of the lists in the book should ultimately find their way into Knowledge (XXG), I think.
1587:, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that
310:
I have an article somewhere which covers this, I'll check it out. I'd imagine the native kindreds just got on with things, but I know Shetland was brought under the Norwegian crown for sometime at some point. Lemme get back to you.
592:
I noted your change to the title of the category "Succession to the British Crown"; it does indeed seem unnecessarily long-winded. Wouldn't "Succession to the Crowns of the Commonwealth Realms" be more succinct but as accurate?
1366:
I noted your wikilink from George Bowes to his father William...which actually redirects to Bill Bowes, the cricketer. Just checking if this was a slip up or if you're going to add an article about William Bowes, MP? Cheers.
1117:
Ah right, I get where you're coming from; I assumed you meant you were confused as to the nature of "Bt." I've done quite a bit of work on articles with baronets involved and personally I always try and keep Bt.'s out of it.
1031:? Peeresses usually have their marital title as part of the article title, while queens consort don't. She is better known as Duchess of Suffolk anyway, especially when referring to her granddaughter's right of succession.
1226:
Wow! For a seemingly straight-forward and simple question, you seem to have opened a proberbial "can of worms". Well, I'm "hooked", and am interested to know the answer! What do you think the next step should be? Cheers,
405:
has been doing with the Bond girls. They basically posted to the talk page what they thought should happen, didn't get a response, and then went ahead with some pretty widespread changes anyway. Their interpretation of
753:
I like the list you've started, but do you mind it being moved to 'List of Chancellors of the University of Dublin'? Strictly speaking, the Provosts are the academic heads of Trinity, the Chancellors of the University.
188:
to bring together all of the good steady work that's been done on those pages. I've also put up succession boxes on the pages, which I hope have also made the history easier to navigate. Thanks for putting this info
269:
of any period; granting out a title after years of abeyance also does not equate to "new creation". For the middle ages at least, the earliest mormaers are not known, so assigning to them a number is ridiculous.
1004:, since it depicts the only woman who used the title of Queen Mother at the point of her life when she used the title, but many users would rather have a free-image of a woman who was never styled Queen Mother.
136:
Oh yes, that too. By the way, on the government pages, is there any reason why all of the non-naval lords of the admiralty haven't been listed? Weren't they politicians who came and went with the government?
1636:
as Thomas’s heir, with the arms of Richard II? Thanks for your time, knowledge and considerations. Can you please reply on the articles talk page. (NB: I've also asked John K & GoodDay) Regards Steve.
611:, and I see it links to someone who (unless I'm misunderstanding something, which is perfectly possible) is ALSO a character in the play. Is that right, please? Can you clarify what your source is? Best,
1469:
to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
242:
a dash in the AG for I, and in Solicitor-General for Ireland, also a dash for the Free State's Attorney-General, but no dash for the post 1937 Irish Attorney General. The complexities of dashes, eh!
238:
I was checking whether their should be a dash included in the AG for I's title. Rather than rely on secondary sources I examined primarily documents (ie, legislation). It would appear that the their
94:
I notice that you seem to have accidentally skipped the Secretary and Under-Secretary for War and the Colonies in this one. I can put in the Secretary myself, but I don't know the Under-Secretary.
226:
gack! ANOTHER love among the ruins! thanks for adding to the disambig page. also, noticed you are interested in the peerage -- have you ever read A Distant Mirror, about Enguerrand de Coucy?
960:
remove those titles yourself? Perhaps she will understand that she is wrong if someone else tells her that. Besides, I've already broken the three-reverts-rule and I am running out of patience.
1543:
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
940:
keeps inserting misleading and unnecessary lines which also make the article look horrible. It's impossible to convince her to stop. Please take a look at the article. I've also urged
1057:). It shouldn't matter how she was styled 400 years ago - it is important how she is referred to today. It's not such a big issue, actually. I just wanted some consistency.
905:
Thankyou for leaving a note on my talkpage, I have replied over there. I only want consistency across the template. May I also offer my sincere thanks for bringing this to
147:
So you think just remove the articles? In terms of the civil lords of the admiralty, the current situation seems to list only one in each government. How does that work?
1326:
1288:
769:
1537:
777:
1177:
1000:
Hi, Opera! I hope you can answer my question: is it allowed to use non-free image in the lead? I believe that Image:QEQM 100th birthday.jpg would be perfect for
1529:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
621:
Ah, thank you. I've just looked up the Lord Marshall in my copy of the play, and I've got a pencil note there which means that I decided NOT to include him in
1702:
776:
in 2006, which is almost identical to yours, which it seems hasn't been linked from anywhere. But I prefer your formatting, shall I merge the two and make
1656:
Even if Miesianiacal is throwing in the towel here (which I doubt), that still leaves dozens of other articles that are distorted by his strange agenda.
562:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
500:. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
673:...has been nominated for speedy deletion as an orphan! I've taken a wikibreak for Lent, so would you mind helping to sort it out please? Many thanks
567:
505:
888:
1629:
1181:
547:
485:
1132:
Yeah, I'm afraid I let that slide. I think I'm slowly coming around to your position, OH, but I'll have to think about it a bit further.
1573:
1559:
625:, which in turn usually only happened when I concluded that the character was just a ghost. Is the best answer to leave this as it was?
543:
481:
1526:
571:
509:
1001:
1080:
649:
622:
1350:
1429:
1028:
205:
1481:
539:
477:
1775:
1767:
1762:
351:
79:
71:
66:
1302:, but it would hardly be correct to place that as identification for the Earl. What would be the best identification?
906:
333:
201:
1530:
1485:
1459:
1246:
Hi. You're quite right on both counts. Lord knows where I was looking. Do you want to change them or shall I? Regards,
551:
489:
1024:
185:
1588:
1584:
1102:
1st (second, third) Baronet"; as such, the Bt. is included (or the full title if you're not a fan of abbreviations).
379:
I moved the article for the simple reason you stated: An English name. I will amend the article to provide a link to
497:
1734:
712:
667:
559:
125:
As a note, the definite article isn't used when it's a courtesey title (at least, we've been playing it that way).
38:
1466:
820:
If so many people want me to stay, perhaps they should do something about getting G2bambino to stop his bullying.
1425:
289:
88:
634:
Don't apologise: your edit was factually correct. You get quirks like that in the histories from time to time.
473:
535:
1712:
1414:
1338:
831:
presumably result in... actually, what would happen? Would User:G2Bambino be blocked from Knowledge (XXG)?
695:
A question has arisen concerning the name of the article "Anthem of Europe". A discussion has opened up in
1548:
795:
1455:
575:
513:
806:
708:
696:
347:
318:
299:
276:
212:
173:
162:
151:
141:
118:
98:
910:
1642:
1496:
1491:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
1342:
704:
700:
1743:
1387:
1346:
1307:
1251:
1197:
1189:
1123:
1107:
1088:
1062:
1036:
1009:
983:
965:
949:
933:
846:
836:
821:
785:
759:
739:
579:
517:
402:
370:
313:
294:
271:
129:
109:
Yes, I was thinking about that as I was doing it. My basic thought was that when you're the "Duke
47:
17:
1458:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a
558:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
496:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
1709:
1401:
1372:
1211:
Hiya.. I'm going through and fixing those. I know it's correct, but sources are proving elusive.
384:
1614:
1544:
1266:
542:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
480:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
1473:
678:
563:
501:
427:
407:
1692:
1661:
1576:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under the
1274:
1232:
1137:
937:
868:
802:
453:
417:
209:
170:
159:
148:
138:
115:
95:
1577:
1477:
1638:
1597:
1492:
1443:
1299:
1295:
918:
442:
398:
1158:
1084:
1606:
1383:
1303:
1247:
1193:
1119:
1103:
1058:
1054:
1032:
1005:
979:
961:
945:
863:
Tomislav II of Croatia, books have been written under that title and not as Aimone. --
832:
781:
755:
735:
727:
653:
635:
626:
612:
594:
432:
126:
208:. Any help in filling out the ones I didn't identify would of course be appreciated.
1397:
1368:
974:
Yes, he is trying to convince her too, but we've been unsuccessful so far; check the
891:
681:
531:
469:
227:
1717:
1696:
1665:
1646:
1618:
1552:
1500:
1433:
1405:
1391:
1376:
1354:
1311:
1278:
1255:
1236:
1216:
1201:
1166:
1157:
Sorry I didn't respond. I'm not very good with complex images... perhaps someone at
1141:
1127:
1111:
1091:
1066:
1040:
1013:
987:
969:
953:
922:
895:
872:
849:
840:
824:
810:
789:
763:
743:
716:
685:
656:
638:
629:
615:
597:
582:
520:
455:
435:
419:
387:
364:
324:
305:
282:
1610:
1540:
until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1522:
1507:
1192:). As someone wish past interactions with this user, you are invited to comment. --
944:, but I am not sure how fast he can react. I'm already on the edge of my nerves...
340:
1609:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
1298:, but without brackets on British peer. British peer as a link is redirected to
431:
splitting based on their size alone, but that would take rather a lot of effort!
1742:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1688:
1657:
1270:
1228:
1133:
864:
773:
448:
426:
Yes, I had noticed the other pages. Is there some way one can stop this person?
412:
361:
243:
190:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1565:
1515:
1480:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see
914:
383:
and will make clarification as to the difference between a Fürst and a Prinz.
354:
1185:
941:
885:
675:
380:
339:
Could you double-check your source for "R. Green", supposedly appointed
1633:
909:
and not into an edit war. Perhaps you want to leave a cross post at
801:
I answered your question on the talk page. (Great user name, BTW.)--
346:? The date is out of sequence, and I suspect there's confusion with
1591:
wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template
1472:
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
292:. This is what I believe is normally done in such circumstances.
1023:
I have another question for you: what do you think about moving
516:
to delete is reached. This article was prodded by an ip editor.
357:
343:
768:
Thanks for your answer. Actually, I've found there's already a
1721:
643:
I've been looking into this some more. Apparently Mowbray was
25:
578:
to delete is reached. Again, it was prodded by an ip editor.
1564:
1442:
566:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
504:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
1525:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
1484:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found
1424:
as the current source does not support the full names. --
1325:
I'm sorry I had to revert your edit. You see you replaced
554:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
492:). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the
234:
Attorney-General for Ireland/Attorney General for Ireland
1421:
975:
608:
1605:
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's
1465:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
726:
It wasn't an intentional redirect, it was a move as
1538:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Basil Murray
1284:British peer as disambiguation page identification
1222:Shoulder boards for Naval officers below flag rank
546:, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
484:, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "
441:It looks like it's being discussed, as I said, at
1679:is all capitals and takes a colon - for instance
1521:A discussion has begun about whether the article
648:Marshal was a ghost, and I should add him to the
538:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
476:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
1327:John Spencer-Churchill, 10th Duke of Marlborough
1289:Charles Gordon-Lennox, Earl of March and Kinrara
845:I'll comment further when the ANI is resolved.
770:List of Chancellors of the University of Dublin
778:List of Chancellors of Trinity College, Dublin
749:List of Chancellors of Trinity College, Dublin
184:Hi, I thought you should know I've created a
8:
1703:Alexander Leslie-Melville, 7th Earl of Leven
1462:at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
1087:that you may or may not wish to comment on.
1708:this redirects to 9th Earl which is wrong.
534:}}" template has been added to the article
472:}}" template has been added to the article
1583:If you can fix the redirect to point to a
1450:Hello. Your account has been granted the "
932:Hello, Oper hat! We need your help around
1628:Hi Opera hat, I’m creating a new article
198:Twentieth Century British Political Facts
1630:User:Stephen2nd/Royal Labels of England
976:Revision history of Catherine of Aragon
410:I suppose but I don't agree with it.
1740:Do not edit the contents of this page.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
222:Love Among the Ruins and other things
7:
1574:Keeper of the Privy Seal of Ireland
1560:Keeper of the Privy Seal of Ireland
1420:Please could you add citations for
913:asking for opinions? Best Regards.
24:
1536:The article will be discussed at
1482:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing process
1291:(b. 8 January 1955) British peer
552:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
490:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
371:Princes of (Fürsten zu) Leiningen
1725:
1514:
1178:Request for comment/User conduct
1049:and Katherine Parr was known as
978:. Thank you anyway, Opera. Bye!
650:list of Shakespearean characters
623:List of Shakespearean characters
588:Succession to the Crown category
29:
1685:{{defaultsort|Firbank, Thomas}}
1681:{{DEFAULTSORT:Firbank, Thomas}}
1619:06:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
1553:01:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
1045:Yes, Mary was indeed known as
1029:Mary Tudor, Duchess of Suffolk
923:11:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
896:10:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
873:22:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
730:was incorrectly prefixed with
657:19:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
639:17:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
630:17:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
616:17:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
206:Coalition Government 1915-1916
1:
1647:13:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
1454:" userright, allowing you to
1279:15:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
1207:arms of her madge in right of
850:21:35, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
841:21:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
825:21:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
811:15:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
790:13:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
764:13:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
686:00:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
574:, where it may be deleted if
512:, where it may be deleted if
352:Solicitor-General for Ireland
1578:criteria for speedy deletion
1434:08:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
1355:23:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
1256:19:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
1237:11:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1217:17:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
1202:17:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
1167:18:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
1142:00:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
1128:12:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
1112:09:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
334:Attorney General for Ireland
202:Liberal Government 1905-1915
1666:05:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
1406:20:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
1392:00:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
1377:19:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
1092:07:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
1067:16:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
1041:13:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
1025:Mary Tudor, Queen of France
1014:12:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
996:Non-free image in the lead?
988:14:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
970:13:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
954:13:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
548:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
486:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
365:23:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
325:16:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
306:15:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
283:15:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
186:List of British Governments
1794:
1697:06:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
1150:Arms of William & Mary
744:17:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
668:Template:British viscounts
456:13:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
436:11:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
428:Knowledge (XXG) guidelines
420:16:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
388:03:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
1572:A tag has been placed on
1501:23:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
1456:review other users' edits
1312:17:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
1267:Doyle's Official Baronage
598:17:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
583:18:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
564:proposed deletion process
521:18:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
502:proposed deletion process
474:High Steward of Newcastle
464:High Steward of Newcastle
290:Magnus II, Earl of Orkney
257:22:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
230:20:34, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
215:02:31, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
193:01:35, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
176:02:36, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
165:02:23, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
154:23:44, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
144:00:36, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
101:04:46, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
89:Whig Government 1846-1852
1294:is an entry on the page
717:02:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
568:speedy deletion criteria
536:High Steward of Stafford
526:High Steward of Stafford
506:speedy deletion criteria
121:23:10, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1718:09:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
1415:Minor campaigns of 1815
1396:I'm glad I asked then!
132:23:19, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1569:
1447:
1439:You are now a Reviewer
858:Tomislav II of Croatia
796:Jim and Mary McCartney
544:criteria for inclusion
482:criteria for inclusion
196:BTW, I've copied from
105:Whoops, sorry. Sorted.
1738:of past discussions.
1568:
1446:
722:Re: Lord Neil Cambell
697:Talk:Anthem of Europe
691:Request for consensus
603:Richard II characters
572:Articles for Deletion
570:or it can be sent to
510:Articles for Deletion
508:or it can be sent to
348:Richard Wilson Greene
42:of past discussions.
1097:RE: Postnominal "Bt"
1624:Royal label origins
1558:Speedy deletion of
1321:Duke of Marlborough
1190:User:PrinceOfCanada
934:Catherine of Aragon
928:Catherine of Aragon
878:Blackadder 4 medals
403:User:SpecialWindler
180:British Governments
18:User talk:Opera hat
1570:
1448:
1180:has been initated
607:I've just noticed
288:OK, I fixed it at
1781:
1780:
1750:
1749:
1744:current talk page
1358:
1341:comment added by
780:into a redirect?
540:proposed deletion
478:proposed deletion
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1785:
1759:
1752:
1751:
1729:
1728:
1722:
1715:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1675:A reminder that
1652:British monarchy
1603:
1602:
1596:
1518:
1453:
1357:
1335:
1215:
1165:
1089:Prince of Canada
1055:see this section
1047:The French Queen
938:User:Chloe2kaii7
847:Prince of Canada
822:Prince of Canada
709:Anameofmyveryown
557:
495:
451:
415:
255:
248:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1755:
1726:
1713:
1706:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1673:
1654:
1626:
1600:
1594:
1593:
1563:
1531:deletion policy
1519:
1512:
1460:two-month trial
1451:
1441:
1418:
1364:
1336:
1323:
1300:British peerage
1296:March (surname)
1286:
1263:
1261:Dukes of Bolton
1244:
1224:
1212:
1209:
1174:
1162:
1152:
1099:
1077:
1051:Queen Katherine
998:
930:
903:
880:
860:
818:
799:
751:
724:
701:friendly notice
693:
671:
605:
590:
555:
528:
493:
466:
447:
443:Talk:James Bond
411:
399:Talk:James Bond
395:
374:
337:
266:
249:
244:
236:
224:
182:
92:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1791:
1789:
1779:
1778:
1773:
1770:
1765:
1760:
1748:
1747:
1730:
1710:Kittybrewster
1705:
1700:
1672:
1669:
1653:
1650:
1625:
1622:
1589:administrators
1585:mainspace page
1562:
1556:
1513:
1511:
1506:Nomination of
1504:
1478:BLP violations
1440:
1437:
1417:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1363:
1360:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1285:
1282:
1262:
1259:
1243:
1240:
1223:
1220:
1208:
1205:
1173:
1170:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1098:
1095:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1021:
997:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
929:
926:
902:
899:
879:
876:
859:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
817:
814:
798:
793:
750:
747:
728:Neill Campbell
723:
720:
692:
689:
670:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
604:
601:
589:
586:
580:LessHeard vanU
556:{{dated prod}}
527:
524:
518:LessHeard vanU
494:{{dated prod}}
465:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
394:
391:
373:
368:
336:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
265:
262:
260:
235:
232:
223:
220:
218:
181:
178:
134:
133:
107:
106:
91:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1790:
1777:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1754:
1753:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1731:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1716:
1711:
1704:
1701:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1690:
1670:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1651:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1631:
1623:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1599:
1590:
1586:
1581:
1579:
1575:
1567:
1561:
1557:
1555:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1541:
1539:
1534:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1517:
1509:
1505:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1489:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1470:
1468:
1467:autoconfirmed
1463:
1461:
1457:
1445:
1438:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1416:
1413:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1362:William Bowes
1361:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1331:
1328:
1320:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1292:
1290:
1283:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1260:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1241:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1206:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1172:RfC/U request
1171:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1149:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1096:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1074:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
995:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
958:
957:
956:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
927:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
900:
898:
897:
894:
893:
890:
887:
877:
875:
874:
870:
866:
857:
851:
848:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
829:
828:
827:
826:
823:
815:
813:
812:
808:
804:
797:
794:
792:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
772:, started by
771:
766:
765:
761:
757:
748:
746:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
721:
719:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
690:
688:
687:
684:
683:
680:
677:
669:
666:
658:
655:
651:
646:
642:
641:
640:
637:
633:
632:
631:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
614:
610:
602:
600:
599:
596:
587:
585:
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
560:its talk page
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
525:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:its talk page
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
463:
457:
454:
450:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
429:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
409:
404:
400:
392:
390:
389:
386:
382:
377:
372:
369:
367:
366:
363:
359:
356:
353:
349:
345:
342:
335:
332:
326:
323:
321:
320:
315:
309:
308:
307:
304:
302:
301:
296:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
279:
278:
273:
263:
261:
258:
256:
254:
253:
247:
241:
233:
231:
229:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
194:
192:
187:
179:
177:
175:
172:
166:
164:
161:
155:
153:
150:
145:
143:
140:
131:
128:
124:
123:
122:
120:
117:
112:
104:
103:
102:
100:
97:
90:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1756:
1739:
1733:
1707:
1674:
1655:
1627:
1592:
1582:
1571:
1545:Clarityfiend
1542:
1535:
1523:Basil Murray
1520:
1510:for deletion
1508:Basil Murray
1490:
1471:
1464:
1449:
1419:
1382:The latter.
1365:
1332:
1324:
1316:
1293:
1287:
1264:
1245:
1225:
1213:
1210:
1175:
1163:
1161:could help?
1156:
1153:
1100:
1078:
1050:
1046:
1002:this article
999:
931:
907:the talkpage
904:
901:Template:FSL
884:
881:
861:
819:
800:
767:
752:
731:
725:
703:" clause of
694:
674:
672:
644:
606:
591:
529:
467:
425:
396:
378:
375:
341:September 21
338:
317:
312:
298:
293:
275:
270:
267:
259:
251:
250:
245:
239:
237:
225:
217:
197:
195:
183:
167:
156:
146:
135:
110:
108:
93:
60:
43:
37:
1732:This is an
1677:DEFAULTSORT
1671:DEFAULTSORT
1337:—Preceding
1079:There is a
911:WP:MARITIME
803:andreasegde
707:. Regards,
36:This is an
1639:Stephen2nd
1493:Courcelles
1314:Dthomsen8
1242:Re: titles
1188:(formerly
1184:regarding
705:WP:CANVASS
393:Bond girls
360:. Thanks.
355:November 1
200:and added
1776:Archive 5
1768:Archive 3
1763:Archive 2
1757:Archive 1
1607:talk page
1474:vandalism
1422:this edit
1384:Opera hat
1343:King Cobb
1304:Dthomsen8
1194:G2bambino
1186:User:Roux
1120:Ironholds
1104:Ironholds
1059:Surtsicna
1033:Surtsicna
1006:Surtsicna
980:Surtsicna
962:Surtsicna
946:Surtsicna
833:Opera hat
816:G2Bambino
782:Strawless
756:Strawless
654:AndyJones
636:AndyJones
627:AndyJones
613:AndyJones
609:this edit
595:G2bambino
576:consensus
514:consensus
433:Opera hat
401:for what
264:1st Earls
127:Mackensen
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
1452:reviewer
1398:Bluewave
1369:Bluewave
1351:contribs
1339:unsigned
942:User:DBD
319:ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ
314:Calgacus
300:ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ
295:Calgacus
277:ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ
272:Calgacus
228:Katefan0
1735:archive
1634:Mowbray
1611:DASHBot
1527:deleted
408:WP:BOLD
385:Charles
376:Hello;
252:ÉIREANN
39:archive
1689:Paul A
1683:, not
1658:john k
1598:hangon
1271:Choess
1248:Craigy
1229:Pdfpdf
1134:Choess
865:Imbris
774:Djegan
736:Craigy
550:" and
488:" and
449:Dismas
413:Dismas
362:Choess
191:Pharos
130:(talk)
1159:WP:GL
1085:WP:AN
1075:Input
1020:head.
915:Woody
530:A "{{
468:A "{{
381:Fürst
189:up.--
16:<
1693:talk
1662:talk
1643:talk
1615:talk
1549:talk
1497:talk
1486:here
1430:talk
1402:talk
1388:talk
1373:talk
1347:talk
1308:talk
1275:talk
1265:Try
1252:talk
1233:talk
1198:talk
1182:here
1154:Hi-
1138:talk
1124:talk
1108:talk
1081:post
1063:talk
1037:talk
1010:talk
984:talk
966:talk
950:talk
919:talk
869:talk
837:talk
807:talk
786:talk
760:talk
740:talk
732:Lord
713:talk
645:Earl
532:prod
470:prod
397:See
358:1842
344:1842
246:Fear
210:john
204:and
171:john
160:john
149:john
139:john
116:john
96:john
1476:or
1426:PBS
1083:on
1027:to
1772:→
1695:)
1664:)
1645:)
1617:)
1601:}}
1595:{{
1551:)
1533:.
1499:)
1488:.
1432:)
1404:)
1390:)
1375:)
1353:)
1349:•
1310:)
1277:)
1269:.
1254:)
1235:)
1200:)
1176:A
1140:)
1126:)
1110:)
1065:)
1039:)
1012:)
986:)
968:)
952:)
936:.
921:)
871:)
839:)
809:)
788:)
762:)
742:)
734:.
715:)
652:.
593:--
350:,
240:is
111:of
76:→
1746:.
1714:☎
1691:(
1687:—
1660:(
1641:(
1613:(
1547:(
1495:(
1428:(
1400:(
1386:(
1371:(
1345:(
1306:(
1273:(
1250:(
1231:(
1196:(
1136:(
1122:(
1106:(
1061:(
1053:(
1035:(
1008:(
982:(
964:(
948:(
917:(
892:D
889:B
886:D
867:(
835:(
805:(
784:(
758:(
738:(
711:(
682:D
679:B
676:D
452:|
416:|
322:)
316:(
303:)
297:(
280:)
274:(
213:k
174:k
163:k
152:k
142:k
119:k
99:k
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.