Knowledge

User talk:Pavel Jelínek

Source 📝

484:
in the summary article -- ideas that haven't really seen much interest or investigation over the years. As far as I know, two-player cellular automata using any rules seem to have commanded only a vanishingly small percentage of Life enthusiasts' collective attention span, and there doesn't seem to be a clear winner for which set of rules gets to be "two-player Life". --
475:
Unfortunately I'm not sure that the new two-player section really belongs there -- unless you know that a significant number of people have actually played the two-player game with those rules. (?) David Eppstein spent a good bit of time several months back, mercilessly taking out sections and links
223:
I really like Knowledge, its idea, atmosfere, pages and user interface. But I think that Knowledge behaves strange in some aspects about editing history. Should I suggest this to Bugzilla, or Village pump? Village pump section technical or proposals? Or am I wrong in some aspect? Or is the benefit in
483:
The problem with Conway's Life is that a horde of people have played with it off and on for over a third of a century now. So there are an enormous number of things that _could_ be said, but it seems like a good idea to keep the article down to a reasonable size, and to avoid mentioning -- at least
270:
I do find descriptions of minor edits to be fairly useful, actually; it's kind of reassuring when you can see what the edit is about right away -- it could maybe help to reassure watchers that you're a human editor, thinking about what you're doing It can seem pretty silly when the edit summary is
346:
Hi - the articles was prodded on April 18th with the concern that it was " NN(Non Notable)board game". The proposed deletion process can be turned over at any time, even after deletion, if there is reason to do so, so please get in contact if you would like to contest the deletion. Please note
264:
On the above questions, for what it's worth -- I'm not much of a Wikipedian, either -- I do see much of the same behavior on my watchlist; I'm still getting used to looking through page histories, and haven't decided if there's a good way to improve it
97:
This section serves to me as shortucts (bookmarks). These are pages that I find difficult to click my way to them from the main page, so I see no convenient way to reach them - so I will paste them here for my convenience (is there a better way?)
476:
involving lots of Conway's-Life variants that didn't seem quite "encyclopedic" enough... Knowledge buzzword, sorry! I guess the best link I can find for it is the discussion of . And maybe -- depending on where you got those rules from --
315:, the article was proposed for deletion and after 5 days, when there were no further edits to that page, an admin reviewed it and found that it can be deleted. Of course only an admin can view the deleted page and tell what exact reason the 369:
How does one insert a text which is visible only to the one who edits the page, but not to the one who browses it? I did not find it in editing help, so I prefer if you tell me the help page where I can find it. (...)
385:
If I write a template with body {{{1|{{{2|{{{3}}}}}}}}} and I call {{mytemplate|||X}}, it does not expand into "X". Is there any better solution than {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|{{#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|{{{3}}}}}}}   ?
234:
And when they look at "diff", they see only differences by this last edit - it would be (I think) more convenient and logical if clicking Diff would show the differences of all those consecutive edits by one
388:
If I want {{mytemplate|X|}} to produce a different output than {{mytemplate|X}}, is there any better way than {{#ifeq:{{{2|NOBODY_WILL_ENTER_EXACTLY_THIS}}}|NOBODY_WILL_ENTER_EXACTLY_THIS|...  ?
378:
Thank you, Fuhghettaboutit. I have just managed to resolve the most important question by experiments. I will soon copy the following to the Village pump (after I accumulate more questions.)
231:
If I make five gigant edits and one last minor edit, they see only one edit (which is nice; I call it "Merged edit"), but they see this Merged edit marked as minor - that is not logical.
207:; they harvest lumber, mine gold and build and repair buildings, which enable creating more advanced units or researching better weapons, thus improving parameters of units. 627:
exists. I will probably move it soon. I will answer to the talk page of those articles. When the discussion will seem settled, is there any reason to wait those 7 days? --
290:
suggests that it is not possible; would not it be fair to enable all users to have a tool for browsing any deleted article including its "deletion discussion"?
162:
throw missiles that deal heavy damage to nine squares at the same time; as they cannot aim at an empty square, it is difficult for them to hit a moving unit.
228:
When I make several edits, other people see only the description of the last edit in MyWatchlist (fortunately they can conveniently see in in "hist")
501:
Imagine that I want to produce a table like this. (I use {{!}} because I intend to add #switch in the future. The following code works perfectly:
238:
When I set in my preferences that I want to be warned if I ommit the description of a change, then there could be an improvement in comfort:
244:
it is strange that it does this even if the edit is minor - if I am right, there is not much point in describing minor edits - or is there?
40: 172:
are vulnerable spellcasters that can heal damaged units, explore any segment of map, make a unit invisible, cast a rain of fire or summon
271:
longer than the change you made to the article -- but it doesn't hurt (I don't think) so I've been superstitiously doing it anyway. --
286:
If someone deletes an article that I have written, can I see the article and its talk page to see the reason of deletion? The article
301: 582:. You do not seem to have done so as yet. I was asked, as someone who deals with a lot of disambiguation pages, to have a look at 579: 241:
when I see "press save again to save anyway", it would be very convenient if an additional "save" button appeared right at the top
150:) are the basic fighting units; they attack from proximity and are used to protect weaker units from being reached by enemies. 396: 624: 587: 112: 77: 347:
that, even after the prod is overturned, the article is subject to deletion through all the usual routes. Thanks,
294: 131: 340:
PS: Am leaving the helpme template so that someone else (an admin perhaps) can give a more comprehensive answer.
391:
Are there help pages which I should read before posting these questions? I did not find the answer when I read
420: 107: 545:
collides with the #switch word. I would expect that replacing = with {{=}} should help, but it does not:
84: 628: 472:. Attempted a few clarifications while I was at it -- hope I haven't damaged your original meaning. 382:
How do I write a template which returns a substring (for example characters 6 to 8) of its parameter?
64: 578:
to a new title and then created a different page at that title, you are responsible for tidying up
352: 57: 656: 416: 255: 123: 591: 327: 37: 647:
I thought you would want to know there is a discussion about the notability of this article
392: 287: 117: 293:
If not, then perhaps the only way is to bother an admin. Then I would like to get the page
158:
can attack any unit in their range and are therefore effective in finishing damaged units.
488: 608: 348: 316: 102: 17: 477: 652: 660: 636: 617: 469: 424: 356: 334: 320: 275: 258: 126: 595: 583: 575: 468:-- I just put a note about your two-player Life variation at the bottom of the 485: 272: 648: 599: 70: 400: 304:, but I would need to know the exact day of deletion, which I do not. 404: 85:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/GodelsIncompletenessTheorems.html
598:, so I have made a "Request Move" to move the disambiguation page. 224:
convenience (of these proposals) so small that it is not worth it
83:
Continue the discussion about Goedels theorems. Add a link to page
188:, have partly different spells, they can turn destoyed units into 215:
These are questions which I asked using the {{helpme}} template.
407:(many things are not clear to me in this one) and a majority of 651:. Since you were a contributor I thought you would have input. 590:: I believe they need to be split differently, with a page at 297:
and especially its talk - either by email or by other means.
408: 525:
If I add the #switch magic word, the code stops working.
623:
Thanks for the notice. I am sorry, I did not notice that
312: 33: 30: 27: 58:
User_talk:Winhunter#How_to_look_at_deletion_discussion
142:Various units serve different purposes in combat. 134:- deleted because someone felt it was non-notable 176:(weak units useful for exploring) or a mighty 541:I believe the reason is that the = symbol in 8: 558: 514: 444: 393:Help:Magic_words#Conditional_expressions 192:, make a unit invulnerable and summon a 196:, the most powerful unit in the game. 7: 25: 574:As you were the editor who moved 302:Knowledge:Archived_delete_debates 219:Strange behaviour of Merged edits 365:Inserting a non-appearing text 259:20:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 138:Suggested addition to Warcraft 127:20:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 637:10:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 618:23:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 594:and a disambiguation page at 425:05:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 397:Knowledge:Conditional tables 311:Hi, as can be seen from the 295:Roads and Boats (board game) 132:Roads and Boats (board game) 547: 527: 503: 433: 113:Knowledge:Categorical_index 78:Talk:Dark_side_of_the_force 676: 497:Preparing the tab question 282:Browsing a deleted article 180:. Their Orc counterparts, 661:13:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC) 401:m:Help:Advanced templates 357:13:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 335:13:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 313:deletion log of that page 632: 570:Following up a page move 489:17:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 405:m:Help:Parameter_default 276:17:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 146:(or faster and stronger 470:Conway's Life talk page 458: 69:Solve the situation on 18:User talk:Pavel Jelinek 625:Šárka (disambiguation) 588:Šárka (disambiguation) 478:"no original research" 199:The working units are 459:Other users' comments 374:Question to templates 463: 65:Go ranks and ratings 76:Look at answers at 580:the incoming links 56:Look at answer at 649:on it's talk page 567: 566: 538: 537: 523: 522: 453: 452: 16:(Redirected from 667: 615: 606: 548: 528: 504: 434: 415:Thanks a lot. -- 409:m:Help:Templates 332: 325: 118:User_talk:Hkmaly 21: 675: 674: 670: 669: 668: 666: 665: 664: 645: 643:iDoc Notability 609: 600: 572: 499: 466: 461: 432: 376: 367: 328: 321: 284: 221: 213: 178:water elemental 140: 95: 54: 49: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 673: 671: 644: 641: 640: 639: 571: 568: 565: 564: 560: 559: 556: 555: 552: 540: 536: 535: 532: 521: 520: 516: 515: 512: 511: 508: 498: 495: 493: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 451: 450: 446: 445: 442: 441: 438: 431: 428: 413: 412: 389: 386: 383: 375: 372: 366: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 338: 337: 283: 280: 279: 278: 267: 266: 250: 248: 247: 246: 245: 242: 236: 232: 229: 220: 217: 212: 211:HELPME section 209: 139: 136: 103:Doolittle raid 101: 94: 91: 89: 53: 50: 48: 45: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 672: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 642: 638: 634: 630: 629:Pavel Jelínek 626: 622: 621: 620: 619: 616: 614: 613: 607: 605: 604: 597: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 569: 562: 561: 557: 553: 550: 549: 546: 544: 533: 530: 529: 526: 518: 517: 513: 509: 506: 505: 502: 496: 494: 491: 490: 487: 481: 479: 473: 471: 464:Conway's Life 456: 448: 447: 443: 439: 436: 435: 429: 427: 426: 422: 418: 417:Pavel Jelinek 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 387: 384: 381: 380: 379: 373: 371: 364: 358: 355: 354: 350: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 336: 333: 331: 326: 324: 318: 314: 310: 309: 308: 305: 303: 298: 296: 291: 289: 281: 277: 274: 269: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 256:Pavel Jelinek 252: 243: 240: 239: 237: 233: 230: 227: 226: 225: 218: 216: 210: 208: 206: 202: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 137: 135: 133: 129: 128: 125: 124:Pavel Jelinek 120: 119: 115: 114: 110: 109: 105: 104: 99: 92: 90: 87: 86: 81: 79: 74: 72: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 46: 44: 42: 39: 35: 32: 29: 19: 646: 611: 610: 602: 601: 592:Šárka (name) 573: 542: 539: 524: 500: 492: 482: 474: 467: 454: 414: 377: 368: 351: 339: 329: 322: 306: 299: 292: 285: 253: 249: 222: 214: 204: 200: 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 141: 130: 121: 116: 111: 108:Village pump 106: 100: 96: 93:My shortcuts 88: 82: 75: 68: 63:Fix tone in 62: 55: 52:My ToDo list 26: 543:colspan="2" 486:Dave Greene 273:Dave Greene 563:Last line 551:First line 531:First line 519:Last line 507:First line 449:Last line 437:First line 182:necrolytes 288:WP:DELETE 190:skeletons 174:scorpions 170:conjugers 160:Catapults 653:Padillah 319:gave. - 300:I tried 201:peasants 186:warlocks 156:spearmen 71:Warcraft 47:My lists 554:Corner 534:Corner 510:Corner 440:Corner 430:Sandbox 317:WP:PROD 307:Thanks 251:Thanks 166:Cleriks 154:or Orc 152:Archers 148:knights 144:Footmen 265:yet... 194:daemon 596:Šárka 584:Šárka 576:Šárka 480:...? 353:inp23 235:user. 205:peons 657:talk 633:talk 586:and 421:talk 349:Mart 330:Oars 203:and 184:and 603:Pam 323:Two 168:and 659:) 635:) 423:) 403:, 395:, 254:-- 122:-- 80:. 73:. 60:. 43:) 41:Io 655:( 631:( 612:D 419:( 411:. 399:, 38:0 36:( 34:K 31:Š 28:W 20:)

Index

User talk:Pavel Jelinek
W
Š
K
0
Io
User_talk:Winhunter#How_to_look_at_deletion_discussion
Go ranks and ratings
Warcraft
Talk:Dark_side_of_the_force
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/GodelsIncompletenessTheorems.html
Doolittle raid
Village pump
Knowledge:Categorical_index
User_talk:Hkmaly
Pavel Jelinek
20:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Roads and Boats (board game)
Pavel Jelinek
20:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Dave Greene
17:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:DELETE
Roads and Boats (board game)
Knowledge:Archived_delete_debates
deletion log of that page
WP:PROD
Two
Oars
13:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.