Knowledge

User talk:Prash1998

Source 📝

124: 211: 71: 23: 290: 135:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 199: 178: 112: 98: 38:
without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate
169:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
331: 259: 101:
to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.
78:
several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
240: 42:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use 248: 174: 140: 327: 252: 275: 195: 108: 323: 298: 224: 184: 31: 219: 43: 313: 309: 305: 233: 170: 128: 79: 191: 104: 94: 55: 47: 244: 147:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 144: 136: 90: 39: 46:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 229: 132: 75: 35: 166: 86: 51: 27: 271: 326:. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 74:
Hi Prash1998! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
308:
that was created to violate Knowledge policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
258:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Knowledge's
267: 210: 155:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
70: 22: 289: 279: 204: 117: 59: 85:
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article
262:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 284: 165:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
209: 82:
disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
247:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 322:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban 251:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 160:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 8: 239:During a dispute, you should first try to 177:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 131:according to the reverts you have made on 127:You currently appear to be engaged in an 264:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} 7: 181:. If you engage in an edit war, you 14: 336:{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} 179:request temporary page protection 288: 122: 93:. If you are unable to agree at 69: 21: 139:with others, to avoid editing 30:. I noticed that you recently 1: 280:14:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 241:discuss controversial changes 205:16:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 118:16:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 228:from editing certain pages ( 60:11:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 355: 324:may be reverted or deleted 99:dispute resolution options 332:guide to appealing blocks 260:guide to appealing blocks 145:try to reach a consensus 97:, please use one of the 334:, then adding the text 171:appropriate noticeboard 297:This account has been 214: 330:by first reading the 312:, but using them for 213: 95:Talk:DAMAC Properties 80:edit warring policy 249:dispute resolution 215: 175:dispute resolution 342: 341: 328:appeal this block 346: 337: 292: 285: 265: 230:DAMAC Properties 192:JohnFromPinckney 150:Points to note: 133:DAMAC Properties 126: 125: 105:JohnFromPinckney 89:to try to reach 76:DAMAC Properties 73: 36:DAMAC Properties 25: 354: 353: 349: 348: 347: 345: 344: 343: 335: 283: 282: 263: 256: 253:page protection 237: 123: 67: 32:removed content 19: 12: 11: 5: 352: 350: 340: 339: 293: 257: 238: 217:You have been 216: 208: 163: 162: 157: 66: 65:September 2024 63: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 351: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 316: 311: 307: 303: 302: 300: 294: 291: 287: 286: 281: 277: 273: 269: 261: 254: 250: 246: 242: 235: 231: 227: 226: 222: 221: 212: 207: 206: 203: 201: 197: 193: 188: 187:from editing. 186: 180: 176: 172: 168: 161: 158: 156: 153: 152: 151: 148: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 120: 119: 116: 114: 110: 106: 100: 96: 92: 88: 83: 81: 77: 72: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 319: 315:illegitimate 314: 301:indefinitely 296: 295: 234:edit warring 225:indefinitely 223: 218: 189: 182: 164: 159: 154: 149: 141:disruptively 121: 102: 84: 68: 48:my talk page 44:your sandbox 40:edit summary 20: 137:collaborate 26:Hello, I'm 17:August 2024 306:sockpuppet 87:talk pages 52:Gaismagorm 50:. Thanks. 28:Gaismagorm 245:consensus 243:and seek 167:talk page 143:, and to 91:consensus 318:reasons 276:contribs 173:or seek 129:edit war 310:allowed 299:blocked 232:) for 220:blocked 185:blocked 183:may be 338:below. 320:is not 304:as a 200:edits 113:edits 34:from 272:talk 268:Elli 236:. 196:talk 109:talk 56:talk 266:. 278:) 274:| 198:/ 190:— 111:/ 103:— 58:) 270:( 255:. 202:) 194:( 115:) 107:( 54:(

Index

Information icon
Gaismagorm
removed content
DAMAC Properties
edit summary
your sandbox
my talk page
Gaismagorm
talk
11:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Information icon
DAMAC Properties
edit warring policy
talk pages
consensus
Talk:DAMAC Properties
dispute resolution options
JohnFromPinckney
talk
edits
16:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
edit war
DAMAC Properties
collaborate
disruptively
try to reach a consensus
talk page
appropriate noticeboard
dispute resolution
request temporary page protection

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.