User talk:Qutezuce

2002: 2141: 1781: 3480: 3632: 3346: 3290: 3234: 2993: 2862: 2759: 1656: 1596: 1536: 3577: 2354: 3114: 3051: 2928: 21: 3406: 2698: 2639: 2591: 2233: 1027: 679:. There have been articles with "(football player)", "(Football Player)", "(American football player)", "(football)", etc. Surely some sort of standardization is a good thing? What I've done can also be adapted for the soccer players as well; "Brazilian football", "Australian football", etc. They're not consistent, either; that's a project for someone else that wants it. 2449: 3649:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3365:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3309:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3253:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3012:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 422:

I hope is a more formal tone. I do agree that the history may have been useful to keep, but then again when I read the first article I felt it was so poorly written that it was probably a first revision that some guy thought it would be cool to start, e.g. nothing really worth keeping (not as if it's "gone" now, anyways).

1002:

doesn't have his own talk page unfortunately. He's now done a further re-edit which is better than his previous revert but in my opinion repetitive (and I think perhaps a little POV). I'm going to leave it for now to give other editors a chance to look at it. It would be nice to establish some style

621:

I've semiprotected it. I agree that it's warranted in this case — since the anon's edits haven't all been from the same IP number, it's unlikely that simply posting a personal talk page note to ask for discussion would reach them. So I also inserted a hidden comment in the article asking the anon to

421:

Hi, thanks for the suggestion - a friend let me know about this feature as soon as I created the new page. I only think that this might be a special case since the only content from the original page that ended up on the new one was - partially - the first line; everything else was rewritten in what

241:

I've been honestly conflicted about including both "Canadian Football League players" & "(CFL team name) players" for each player bio. I'd normally be inclined to leave it at " players" category, and that's it ... but when you look @ the "Category:Canadian Football League players" section, it's

175:

Haha, well didn't you know that lake is actually in the middle of the ocean?? We are just taught to BELIEVE that it's actually on land somewhere. ;) ... thanks for picking that up. I will have to verify my links more carefully. With your googl map suggestion, it should make that job MUCH easier.

698:

I understand your misgivings about players who frequently move back and forth between the countries; however, how many of them are likely to actually need any sort of designation after their name? It's only being done in cases where there's a need to distinguish an athlete from a politician, actor,

586:

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The article as it's currently written doesn't violate any copyright issues that I know of; it's been significantly rewritten from the prior version. I'm not entirely convinced that she's actually notable enough for an article, though, so I'll keep an eye on

3439:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

960:

i'm moving the information to the main page. I don't have time to walk you through edits i made months ago. the episode lists are for that exact reason "episodes". The information is important but I moved it to the main page were it's more relevant. Look at major television shows episode lists and

1330:

I've watched this unfold over the last couple minutes on my watchlist, and I'd like to offer a suggestion. Instead of reverting each other, stop editing the trivia tags and talk it out. Removing the non-binding tag, no matter how valid, is perfectly acceptable. This is a wiki, it happens. The

667:

What the U.S. and Canada call "Football" is different than what the rest of the world means by "football", i.e., "soccer". The naming convention makes the distinction clear. The links are red because as I was changing some links in an article I changed all the ones that had "(football player)"; I

367:

article. However, we should ask him not to make any changes to other articles unless those types of information is saved and if possible he can add them to the brackets. However, the seasons where the playoffs are complicated (60's - 70's) are off-limits, because I don't see how you can make a

984:

Thanks for your helpful edits on the old Grey Cup games I'm trying to make pages for. I've also been going through more recent games trying to improve the tone of some of the articles, which look like they have been copied from newspaper reports, and tighten them up. I ran into a snag with the

141:

You must be looking at an old page? I deleted that part last month. It was before I knew about copyrights and stuff when I was first starting on Wiki. There is notheing there now and I changed all the other gardens as well. If it should be merged as well I agree, there is a note on the page.

993:

reverted the changes. Since I had explained my changes in depth on the talk page and he said nothing at all I have reverted his but I don't want to get into a revert war. Would you be so kind as to have a look at the page and my comments on the talk page and give your opinion? Thanks again.

1349:

To quote from your message to me: "but we don't remove them or tag them with cleanup in order to try to "fix" this problem.". The whole idea of cleanup tags is to point out that a section or article needs cleaning up. Ideally, there shouldn't be trivia sections at all. As for your argument

843:

Lastly, let me apologize again for the confusion this has caused and reiterate that I am bowing out of the discussion. I feel that a convention does need to be created, but I'm not all that big a sports fan to start with, so I'll leave it to folks more familiar with the nuances.

256:

Oh, I've had the same concerns. I can't say I feel particularly strongly about AFDing them, though, which is why I've been doing cleanup work on them, but I wouldn't necessarily object if somebody else wanted to nominate them for the trash can. Not that I'm hinting or anything.

1331:

same is true for adding it, someone felt that the article had too much trivia. Both of y'all have valid opinions on the issue, the edit history of the articles in question shows that you're not going to convince each other via revert-pong, so talk it out instead please. -

1972:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1863:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1687:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1627:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1567:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2248: 3145:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 3082:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2959:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2729:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2670:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 3603:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1358:

that level of detail, as it is indiscriminate information, and a lot of it is best suited to fansites. As I said before trivia should be either integrated where appropriate, or removed altogther. Some of these articles have several screenfuls of mindless

1748:

Hi there, I got your message regarding some Winnipeg article, but I suppose the IP of whoever was using it has switched to me. I'm afraid whoever you intended to send your message to ended up on my IP's talk page! I'm a registered user of Knowledge,

1734:. However, I'm unable to identify exactly where the image came from, since I need to put that in the source column... you wouldn't happen to know where you found it, would you? Thanks -- I'd appreciate if you'd get back to me on my talk page. -- 1422:

guidelines to alert and remind editors to place the trivia section items within the text as they can. I respect your right to disagree with the placement of the tags, but would rather you discuss them first on the aircraft talk pages or the

671:

The convention I'm using is that the "American" or "Canadian" is determined by which country the player is currently playing for. The articles generally give the current position of the player first and then add that they played elsewhere.

2533: 124:

article the edit summary you put was "Copyright article by Wayne Ray 1991 WayneRay 22:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)WayneRay". As it says below every edit box on Knowledge, any text you submit to Knowledge you must agree to license it under the

605:, and could use your assistance on By Bailey. Can you check any sources you may know of in Canada and let me know when Bailey died? You would think the Lions' website would be informative, but sadly, it isn't (at least on this issue). 839:

states: "In other words, readers of Knowledge would have to use a redirect link about 10,000 times before it would be worthwhile to replace that link with a direct link." Arguably, most of these links will be used 10,000 times or more.

827:

I've now finished updating all the article links so that they bypass the redirect pages that were created when I moved the original pages. I've also been informed that this was incorrect as well, and there's a whole section on it at

1914: 2420:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our 2413:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

3607:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

762:

Thanks for noticing. It was indeed a mistake. I mistook that '''Bold text''' for another thing. I should have paid more attention, and I will record this mistake. Once again, thanks for alerting me. Best regards.

3192:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2374:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

491:

article, and could use some help. Please take a look at it when you get a chance, and help me clean it up. I think the All-time CFL passing leader's article could (and should) be better than it currently

160:

I just wanted to quickly reply to your post on my talk page. Thanks very much for the fantastic info ... I will definitely see about incorporating your ideas! Also, I am JUST in the process of creating

1140:

pages. Secondly, I don't know how long they'll last up there, but thanks for restoring those MySpace blog citations. I understand why Knowledge wouldn't accept them as proper citation anymore, but they

1968:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1859:

1683:

1623:

1563:

3141:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3078:

2955:

2725:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2666:

652:

Ah, thanks for that. I've seen this occur quite a few times, and generally catch it before I approve the edits the bot is about to make. I guess this time it just slipped through the net. Cheers,

2527: 1289:

Why are you removing this tag from articles? Many of these articles have hideously large trivia sections with information that can be either integrated into the prose or removed altogether.--

449:

about the IP user. Any further comments you have there would be appreciated. (The IP was blocked for 3 months on July 13, but I have no idea if that had anything to do with the RFI.) Thanks,

1455: 2209: 836: 3600: 2327: 2900:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2173:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1813:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3692: 2120: 3687: 2169:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1809:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

126: 2896:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2300: 2295: 1078:

article. It needs a clean-up and proper citations for some of the material that is there. I'm not sure how to go about getting a peer review of it. Could you assist at all?

880:

I am just wondering if you have the svg program to allow pictures to appear on wikipedia? Because currently I don't have a program, is it possible that you can go from the

62:

Thank you for adding that transition at the start of the paragraph on scrimmage kicks in the US. I thought I had put one in, but apparently it slipped out during editing. —

2304: 2026:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

1925:

during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

961:

you won't see any season information. you gotta meet in the middle. The information was moved to the main page. I don't know why this is bothering you months later. love,

2251:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- 2605: 2287: 465:

Could you lock the Panorama Tools (Software) page from being changes by a bitter PanoTools NG member? Brion knows me and has helped the PanoTools group in the past.

2608:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1241:

But if you were in charge of editing the subject content, what would you add? I feel that everything you need to know about TLP is already written in the article...

824:

I won't go into a long, drawn-out explanation of how I got started on this; suffice it to say that there is a gay porn star with the same name as a football player.

363:

I think it is cool that there is a playoff bracket, but there is no signals or signs that states the dates or the home team. Luckily, that information is in the

2093: 2088: 899:, whatever information that you want to add about the failures and little success about the franchises and the market it would be located on those team pages. 2097: 2889:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2786:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2162:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1802:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2885:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2782:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2158:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1798:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1419: 1311: 2080: 847:

I'm posting this at several user talk pages in response to comments made on my talk page about this; if you have further comments, please make them on my

3135: 3072: 2949: 2719: 2660: 1962: 1853: 1677: 1617: 1557: 2214:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –

3589: 2548: 2407: 2386: 165:, if you are feeling adventurous, please consider joining the project and adding your suggestions to the main article! Cheers from Edmonton, Alberta 2515: 2240: 1922: 1902: 1894: 1888: 2461: 2205: 1451: 1261: 1198: 1106: 334:

Thanks. I created a redirect for the film article to the more film and TV complete article and the HSC one should probably be deleted no problem.

3661: 3541: 3425: 3395: 3377: 3321: 3265: 3146: 3083: 3024: 2960: 2905: 2730: 2671: 2178: 1973: 1864: 1818: 1688: 1628: 1568: 546: 271:

I'm only vaguely familiar with Checkuser, so I'm not sure if that is considered acceptable, but I'll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion. —

206:, the location of birth or death should be separated from the date! You could decide for yourself and make the appropriate changes if needed. 1447: 829: 407:

Done. (Actually, we admin types have special secret powers that make merging new edits into an old history a lot easier than you'd think...)

317: 3217: 1760: 2509: 3154: 3091: 2968: 2734: 2675: 2496: 2425: 2421: 2371: 1977: 1868: 1692: 1632: 1572: 1424: 1376:

The changes to Quake III are only initial. With additional info on the development, those sections could become something much better.--

35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2264: 542: 535: 3444:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3150: 3087: 2964: 2505: 1145:

be acceptable in certain cases (ie. performer's behind-the-scenes info on the set of a television series). :) Anyway, thanks again.

805: 1672: