291:. As long as we keep the article at a manageable length (<500-600 words), keep it well formatted, and well referenced, I see no reason why it couldn't possibly be over the limit. I understand the importance of having rules, but we're here to improve an encyclopedia, not limit it because of a rule. Furthermore, articles with trivia sections are encourage to integrate these sections into the articles. By not using a word cap, we could improve the article by integrating the trivia section into it.Cheers!
349:. We're looking for people who have good knowledge of the show, and can help improve the articles relating to it. If you're interested at all, you can either list your name under the "Membership Reconfirmation" heading (we're under going a reconfirmation period, but are still interested in new members), or reply to me either here or at my talk page, whichever you choose. But if you choose not to join, I would just like to tell you that you do great work on
275:
further explanation, there isn't any reason to delete it. Furthermore, the runtime of that episode was closer to 22 minutes, therefore, the article would allow for 220 words. Thank you for your help in that nature, but a revert on that wasn't neccessary. Instead of completely reverting, next time try to trim what I have written. Remember that information poorly presented is better than not being presented at all. Cheers!
381:
217:
Ahh. Makes sense. Although, if you leave it just under the limit, people are going to keep adding things. And if you want to keep it under the limit, you're going to keep having to retrim it. If you really want to keep it under the limit, I suggest you trim it until it's significantly below the
238:
You removed what I wrote about there being smoke coming off of
Phyllis' thumb when she pantomimes shooting herself during the conference scene of this episode. I can understand you amending the post because I speculated in it, but if you actually watch the scene, you will see that there is smoke
274:
You reverted what I wrote about an article on the Office for the fact of the 10 words/minute rule. While I see your reasoning on that, please remember that it is a "rough" rule. All articles of that nature aren't technically limited to a 200 word limit. When the nature of the episode merits
164:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
193:
FYI, you shouldn't expect the typical user to delete something when they add something to a plot synopsis that is near the word limit. The typical user isn't sophisticated enough to know that and/or they don't care about the word limit as much as you do. -
450:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
316:
200 words has always been more than sufficient to cover the essential points of an episode. Indeed, if pressed, I bet it can be done in 50 words. The overages are caused by people adding nonessential detail. --
169:
120:
Ok. No problem. Seems like a weird thing to do on accident. But that hair title had just been added. Maybe you were working from a version of the page that hadn't yet recognized that update. -
239:
there. It is a quick puff, right above her thumb. I'm watching it on a regular definition television set and I can see it. Please review the DVD and you will see the smoke there.
65:
that is unethical and idiotic how could one propose to move all quotes to
Wikiqoute when the quote is relevent to the actual show and or page. think twice and use your brain. --
242:
In the meantime, I am reversing the change you made, but I am also removing the speculation in question. If you'd like to contact me, you can reach me at john@muscofilms.com
204:
I realize that. The remark is there so that when the user says "Why did they delete my contribution?" they know what they need to do to make it acceptable. --
161:
346:
475:
252:
165:
157:
417:
361:
144:
Thanks for finding a happy medium about the character Karen leaving the office. Hopefully this will stop the constant reverts!
471:
181:
287:
Well, I see what you mean by that, but I don't see how we can limit the word count when it prevents improving the article (
462:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
467:
153:
407:
status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and
25:
to the
Wikiproject proposal page hid all of the projects after your project. Please be more careful with your edits.
288:
160:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
138:
41:
256:
81:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Michael_Scott_%28The_Office%29&diff=prev&oldid=159211292
400:
53:
305:
actually says there's a preferable limit, but don't limit yourself to it if the summary becomes useless.
248:
102:
Oops. I got that. I meant, what was the point of removing the section title "Hair" in that edit? -
318:
205:
112:
94:
463:
93:
That even the producers of the show don't consider
Michael Scott's license plate to be notable. --
408:
66:
439:
430:
302:
49:
459:
443:
458:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
412:
354:
292:
276:
219:
218:
limit, so that you won't have to trim it again every time people add a little bit more. -
195:
185:
121:
103:
84:
455:
447:
57:
45:
451:
31:
Sorry i sent this to the wrong person. Maybe i should be more careful with my edits!
404:
390:
307:
32:
26:
145:
380:
341:
Hey
Raymond, I see you do a ton of great work with episodes relating to
479:
421:
366:
326:
311:
297:
281:
260:
222:
208:
198:
188:
148:
124:
115:
106:
97:
87:
69:
60:
35:
184:? It seems like the sort of thing that'd be right up your alley. -
446:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
52:
for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the
80:
23:
56:
to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
182:
Talk:Money_(The_Office_episode)#Plot_synopsis_length
438:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
44:on Knowledge. Your test worked, and it has been
8:
231:The Office: "Performance Review" smoking gun
353:articles, and keep it up! Happy editing,
40:Thank you for experimenting with the page
378:
180:Do you have any comment on my comment at
399:Thanks Raymondc0 for helping to promote
111:Accident. Didn't even notice, sorry. --
347:Knowledge:WikiProject The Office (US)
345:, and I just wanted to inform you of
7:
14:
464:review the candidates' statements
79:What was the point of this edit?
379:
470:. For the Election committee,
440:Arbitration Committee election
431:ArbCom elections are now open!
409:give someone a pat on the back
125:19:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
116:18:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
107:16:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
98:04:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
88:03:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
480:16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
298:13:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
282:21:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
36:20:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
29:20:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
422:05:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
261:20:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
223:02:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
209:00:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
199:22:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
189:04:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
70:19:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
466:and submit your choices on
154:The Office (U.S. TV series)
149:18:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
495:
472:MediaWiki message delivery
168:. Reviewers' concerns are
61:15:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
385:
367:22:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
327:00:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
312:00:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
156:has been nominated for a
42:The Office (US TV series)
322:
158:featured article review
48:or removed. Please use
401:Cocktails (The Office)
337:The Office Wikiproject
444:Arbitration Committee
245:Thanks, John Musco
448:arbitration process
372:A barnstar for you!
460:arbitration policy
75:Michael Scott edit
427:
426:
263:
251:comment added by
486:
383:
376:
375:
357:
295:
289:Ignore All Rules
279:
246:
162:featured quality
17:Wikiproject Page
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
468:the voting page
434:
420:
374:
364:
355:
339:
293:
277:
271:Hello Raymond,
269:
233:
178:
142:
77:
22:Hi, Your edits
19:
12:
11:
5:
492:
490:
437:
433:
428:
425:
424:
416:
396:
395:
386:
384:
373:
370:
360:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
268:
267:10/Minute Rule
265:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
212:
211:
177:
174:
141:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
76:
73:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
482:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
432:
429:
423:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
394:
392:
387:
382:
377:
371:
369:
368:
363:
358:
352:
348:
344:
336:
328:
324:
320:
315:
314:
313:
310:
309:
304:
301:
300:
299:
296:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
272:
266:
264:
262:
258:
254:
253:68.197.75.179
250:
243:
240:
236:
230:
224:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
207:
203:
202:
201:
200:
197:
191:
190:
187:
183:
175:
173:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
147:
140:
136:
126:
123:
119:
118:
117:
114:
110:
109:
108:
105:
101:
100:
99:
96:
92:
91:
90:
89:
86:
82:
74:
72:
71:
68:
67:Jkskater4ever
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
38:
37:
34:
30:
28:
24:
16:
435:
418:ontributions
405:Good Article
391:Good Article
388:
350:
342:
340:
306:
294:-Mastrchf91-
278:-Mastrchf91-
273:
270:
244:
241:
237:
235:Hi Raymond,
234:
192:
179:
152:
143:
78:
64:
54:welcome page
39:
21:
20:
247:—Preceding
50:the sandbox
456:topic bans
413:Sp33dyphil
356:Mastrchf91
343:The Office
303:WP:EPISODE
220:Shaheenjim
196:Shaheenjim
186:Shaheenjim
139:The Office
137:Regarding
122:Shaheenjim
104:Shaheenjim
85:Shaheenjim
452:site bans
411:today. --
319:Raymondc0
206:Raymondc0
113:Raymondc0
95:Raymondc0
58:BlackBear
393:Barnstar
249:unsigned
46:reverted
442:. The
351:Office
33:Yaanch
27:Yaanch
176:Money
146:Yavoh
476:talk
389:The
323:talk
308:Will
257:talk
170:here
166:here
436:Hi,
403:to
478:)
454:,
365:)
359:(/
325:)
259:)
172:.
83:-
474:(
415:©
362:c
321:(
255:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.